Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1636707

This article is part of the Research TopicDeterminants of Achievement in Top SportView all 23 articles

Team vs Individual Sports in Adolescence: Gendered Mechanisms Linking Emotion Regulation, Social Support, and Self-Efficacy to Psychological Resilience

Provisionally accepted
Dongyue  WeiDongyue Wei1Zhe  RenZhe Ren2Jiajie  XueJiajie Xue1Yongzhao  FanYongzhao Fan3*
  • 1Yantai Nanshan University, Longkou, China
  • 2Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
  • 3Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study advances current understanding by systematically investigating how team versus individual sports differentially influence adolescent psychological resilience through emotion regulation, social support, and self-efficacy pathways, with particular attention to gender moderation effects. Methods: Drawing on multi-wave data from 698 Chinese adolescents (aged 12-18 years), we implemented a mediation model featuring two distinct pathways to elucidate mechanisms unique to each sport type. Hierarchical regression and bootstrapped analyses were utilized to evaluate: (1) the unique mediating contributions of emotion regulation (ER), social support (SS), and self-efficacy (SE) across sport categories, and (2) the moderating influence of gender on these pathways. Results: (1) Team sports significantly enhance adolescents' levels of social support while individual sports notably improve self-efficacy; both types of exercise positively predict psychological resilience. (2) Emotional regulation, social support, and selfefficacy play significant mediating roles between physical activity and psychological resilience. Specifically, team sports primarily influence psychological resilience by enhancing social support and subsequently boosting self-efficacy; conversely, individual sports mainly strengthen psychological resilience through increased selfefficacy. (3) Gender has a significant moderating effect within team sports; specifically, Female exhibit a stronger impact of emotional regulation on psychological resilience compared to male who demonstrate more pronounced benefits from enhanced selfefficacy regarding their psychological resilience. In contrast to team sports, gender significantly moderated the social support-resilience relationship in individual sports, with stronger associations observed for female.Our findings demonstrate that sport types function as gendered ecological niches for resilience cultivation. Specifically, team settings leverage interpersonal dynamics to enhance male self-efficacy and Female emotional competencies, while individual activities offer equitable platforms for social support development. These insights contest uniform exercise recommendations and furnish a blueprint for tailored, gender-sensitive interventions grounded in sport participation.

Keywords: team sport, Individual sport, psychological resilience, self-efficacy, Ecological niche theory, emotional regulation, social support

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Ren, Xue and Fan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yongzhao Fan, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.