Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Media Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1636906

This article is part of the Research TopicReimagining roles and identity in the era of human - AI collaborationView all 6 articles

Why Unequal AI Access Enhances Team Productivity: The Mediating Role of Interaction Processes and Cognitive Diversity

Provisionally accepted
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is widely viewed as valuable for improving the performance of human-agent teams (HATs). However, in reality, not all members have equal access to AI tools, making uneven AI integration an important factor impacting team composition and, thus, team effectiveness. While unequal access might seem detrimental, potentially hindering technology utilization, it could also foster deeper interactions and diverse expertise. To clarify these mechanisms, this study extends the classic Input-Mediator-Output model to an Input-Process-State-Output (IPSO) framework. A lab experiment with 60 two-person teams reveals that unequal AI access yields the highest productivity, improving both task quality and completion time compared to no or full AI access. This effect is driven by two key mechanisms. First, negative socio-emotional interactions and increased cognitive diversity serve as a positive serial mediation pathway linking unequal AI access to enhanced task quality. Second, unequal AI access leads to more concentrated and imbalanced questioning behaviors, which accelerates task completion. This study provides an in-depth theoretical explanation of how AI integration structures operate in HATs and offers a foundation for strategically optimizing GenAI access in human-agent teaming.

Keywords: AI access, Cognitive Diversity, team interaction processes, team productivity, Human-agent teams, human -AI collaboration

Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Han and Ren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ruqin Ren, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.