ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641212
This article is part of the Research TopicDemystifying Academic Writing in Higher Education: A Process View on Academic Textual ProductionView all 10 articles
Optimizing Academic Engagement and Mental Health through AI: An Experimental Study on LLM Integration in Higher Education
Provisionally accepted- Xi'an International University, Xi'an, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: In alignment with UNESCO's Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4), which advocates for inclusive and equitable quality education, the integration of Artificial Intelligence tools—particularly Large Language Models (LLMs)—presents promising opportunities for transforming higher education. Despite this potential, empirical research remains scarce regarding the effects of LLM use on students' academic performance, mental well-being, and engagement, especially across different modes of implementation. Objective: This experimental study investigated whether a guided, pedagogically grounded use of LLMs enhances students' academic writing quality, perceived mental health, and academic engagement more effectively than either unguided use or no exposure to LLMs. The study contributes to UNESCO's "Futures of Education" vision by exploring how structured AI use may foster more inclusive and empowering learning environments. Method: A total of 246 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: guided LLM use, unguided LLM use, or a control group with no LLM access. Participants completed a critical writing task and standardized instruments measuring academic engagement and mental well-being. Prior academic achievement was controlled for, and writing quality was assessed using Grammarly for Education. Results: Students in the guided LLM condition achieved significantly higher scores in writing quality and academic engagement compared to the control group, with large and moderate effect sizes, respectively. Modest improvements in mental health indicators were also observed. By contrast, unguided use yielded moderate gains in writing quality but did not produce significant effects on engagement or well-being. Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical role of intentional instructional design in the educational integration of AI tools. Structured guidance not only optimizes academic outcomes but also supports students' well-being and inclusion. This study offers empirical evidence to inform ongoing debates on how digital innovation can contribute to reducing educational disparities and advancing equitable learning in the post-pandemic era.
Keywords: Large language models, Academic writing, Mental Health, student engagement, higher education, guided instruction, Educational Technology, AI-assisted learning
Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Min Zhang, Xi'an International University, Xi'an, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.