Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Cognitive Science

Eye-Tracking Metrics for Estimating Workload and Characterizing Errors in Conflict Detection and Resolution during Simulated En Route Air-Traffic Control

Provisionally accepted
José  A. NaviaJosé A. Navia1,2Jorge  Ibáñez-GijónJorge Ibáñez-Gijón1*David  TraviesoDavid Travieso1Aitor  MontesAitor Montes1Patricia  López De FrutosPatricia López De Frutos3
  • 1Departamento de Psicología Básica, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 2Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Alcala Facultad de Educacion, Guadalajara, Spain
  • 3CRIDA A.I.E. ATM R&D + Innovation Reference Centre, Madrid, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Growing traffic density and airspace complexity demand adaptive decision-support tools that anticipate when controllers are approaching overload or conflicts are mishandled. Ocular behavior offers a single, unobtrusive stream that simultaneously reflects global mental workload (MWL) and moment-to-moment attentional allocation. The present study examined whether eye-tracking metrics can estimate MWL and expose the mechanisms underlying errors in conflict detection and resolution during simulated en route control. Twenty-four novice participants worked six 16-minute radar scenarios that varied traffic load and sector complexity. A remote eye-tracker recorded pupil diameter, blink dynamics, and fixations on static and aircraft-centered areas of interest, while subjective MWL was sampled with the Instantaneous Self-Assessment and NASA-TLX scales. Higher traffic density increased self-reported MWL, enlarged pupils, reduced blinks and blink durations, and concentrated fixations inside the active sector, whereas higher traffic complexity increased MWL, reduced blinks, and concentrated fixations inside the active sector. Blink rate and pupil size accounted for most of the variance in MWL (up to 94%). In addition, two scripted conflict events were exam-ined in greater detail. In the simpler conflict, errors primarily stemmed from failures in detection. Successful resolutions were characterized by sustained gaze on both converging aircraft and a higher frequency of altitude-change clearances, while failures showed reduced fixation times and a lack of interventions. In contrast, errors in the more complex conflict resulted from planning break-downs despite initial detection. Successful resolutions in this case typically involved at least two interventions, whereas failures were associated with prolonged fixation times but insufficient corrective action. Thus, global ocular indices provide precise estimates of MWL, and gaze-action cou-plings can help anticipate errors in conflict detection and resolution. Embedding both levels of inference in adaptive ATC support systems could enable real-time MWL management, and proactive mitigation of separation-loss events.

Keywords: Air-traffic control, eye tracking, Mental Workload, Conflict detection, Conflict Resolution, human factors

Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Navia, Ibáñez-Gijón, Travieso, Montes and López De Frutos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jorge Ibáñez-Gijón, jorge.ibannez@uam.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.