Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1647910

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews in Educational PsychologyView all 20 articles

Editorial: Reviews in Educational Psychology

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Universidad de Leon, León, Spain
  • 2University of León, León, Spain
  • 3Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 4Boston University, Boston, United States
  • 5School of Clinical Medicine, Medical University of America-Nevis, Denves, MA, United States
  • 6National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, Taiwan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The present article introduces the Research Topic "Reviews in Educational Psychology," part of the "Reviews in" series launched by Frontiers in Psychology. This initiative highlights the growing importance of synthesis studies in consolidating knowledge and advancing the maturity of the discipline (Campos et al., 2024; Jaramillo-Mediavilla et al., 2024).Educational Psychology, as an applied field, has reached a stage where synthesizing accumulated evidence is not only valuable but necessary. This collection showcases the diversity of review formats-systematic, theoretical, scoping, meta-analytical-and includes a comprehensive systematic review of reviews, reflecting a shift toward second-order syntheses that integrate large bodies of prior research.Although the focus is on reviews, a small number of original studies are also featured. These contributions, some based on expert consensus or large-scale data analysis, complement the review findings by offering empirical insights into key constructs and emerging research trends.The distribution of articles by typology and year illustrates both the scope of contributions and the growing methodological variety in the field. Together, these works demonstrate how diverse approaches-qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-contribute to a cumulative, theory-informed understanding of psychological processes in education (DeCuir-Gunby & Schutz, 2024; Kumar & DeCuir-Gunby, 2023), as summarized in Figure 1. The geographical distribution of the selected articles reveals a notable balance between Western and Eastern regions, highlighting the global scope and interdisciplinary appeal of current research in educational psychology (Figure 2). This near parity underscores the increasing internationalization of review-based research and the relevance of educational challenges across diverse cultural and regional contexts. Collectively, these contributions reflect the evolving and multifaceted landscape of educational psychology research, highlighting critical issues such as creativity, emotional regulation, literacy, teacher values, and mental health in education. Each study enriches our understanding and provides practical implications, ultimately guiding educators, researchers, and policymakers toward more informed and effective practices. This compilation underscores the necessity for ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration, robust research methodologies, and continuous innovation to address educational challenges in an ever-changing global context.

Keywords: Reviews in Educational Psychology, Systematic review of reviews, Systematic reviews, Scoping review, Meta-analysis

Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 10 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Díaz-Burgos, García, Álvarez-Fernández, de la Fuente, Kauffman and Hsu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jesús N García, University of León, León, Spain

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.