Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1649744

Reconceptualizing Learning Engagement: Evidence for a Context-Sensitive Structure in STEM Education

Provisionally accepted
Eric  Trevor McChesneyEric Trevor McChesney1*Christian  Dieter SchunnChristian Dieter Schunn1Gerard  Dorve-LewisGerard Dorve-Lewis1Allison  GodwinAllison Godwin2Linda  DeAngeloLinda DeAngelo1
  • 1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
  • 2Cornell University, Ithaca, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Understanding student engagement as a psychological construct remains a persistent challenge in educational psychology, particularly in higher education STEM contexts. Traditional models distinguish engagement into behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions, yet often overlook how the structure of engagement may be shaped by contextualized learning activities. This study introduces and tests a novel, activity space-based model of engagement, hypothesizing that behavioral and cognitive engagement are organized by the specific academic environments in which they occur (e.g., lectures, exams, projects, recitations). Applying new engagement survey instruments that were iteratively developed to be contextually meaningful, we first present an exploratory factor analysis applied to 1,176 students from two different courses and institutions. Then we present a confirmatory factor analysis applied to 772 students in a third course. We find that a model organized by activity contexts—rather than by behavioral and cognitive distinctions—better fits the data and generalizes across STEM disciplines. The findings challenge conventional engagement theory and support a reconceptualization of engagement as a partially context-sensitive construct. This theoretical shift has implications for psychological models of learning and for the design of more precise, equitable interventions that address varied patterns of engagement within and across STEM domains.

Keywords: engagement, Learning, STEM - Science Technology Engineering Mathematics, ABC model, higher education, Factor Structure, Measurement, Disengagement

Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 McChesney, Schunn, Dorve-Lewis, Godwin and DeAngelo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Eric Trevor McChesney, erm216@pitt.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.