Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652882

This article is part of the Research TopicTowards a Psychophysiological Approach in Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sports-Volume VView all 17 articles

Effects of mind-body exercise intervention on anxiety among women: a meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Pendidikan, Bangi, Malaysia
  • 2Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China
  • 3Dazhou Vocational College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dazhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective:This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mind-body exercise (MBE) interventions in reducing anxiety among women and to explore potential intervention characteristics associated with greater efficacy. Methods: Seventeen studies involving 1,044 female participants were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention type, weekly frequency, session duration, total intervention period, geographical region, and participant age. A random-effects model was applied to estimate pooled effect sizes and assess heterogeneity. The analysis adhered to Cochrane guidelines and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. Results: Mind-body exercise (MBE) interventions were associated with a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms among women, yielding a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of –1.14 (95% CI: [–1.56, –0.72], p < 0.00001). However, substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed (I² = 89%, Tau² = 0.68), indicating considerable variability in effect sizes across studies. Among intervention types, Pilates showed the largest effect (SMD = –1.47, 95% CI: [–2.52, –0.41]), though this finding was based on only four studies and was accompanied by high heterogeneity (I² = 93%), warranting cautious interpretation. Similarly, greater effects were observed for interventions involving 90-minute sessions conducted three times per week over a period of 8–12 weeks (e.g., SMD = –1.46, 95% CI: [–2.18, –0.74]). Nonetheless, these subgroup analyses also exhibited high heterogeneity (I² values > 90%), suggesting that these parameters may not be universally optimal. Further subgroup analyses indicated stronger intervention effects in studies conducted outside China (SMD = –1.36, I² = 93%) and among women aged 56 years and older (SMD = –1.30, I² = 74%). Conclusion:Mind-body exercise interventions appear to have a substantial anxiolytic effect in women. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the consistently high heterogeneity observed across analyses, as indicated by I² values exceeding 85% in most subgroups and the presence of wide prediction intervals. Although certain formats, such as Pilates and intermediate-duration programs, show potential, further high-quality and culturally diverse trials are necessary to validate and refine intervention protocols.

Keywords: mind-body exercise, Anxiety, Women, female, Mental Health, effect size

Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Shakila Mazalan, Koh, Gu, Du and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Peng Chen, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Pendidikan, Bangi, Malaysia
Nur Shakila Mazalan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Pendidikan, Bangi, Malaysia
Denise Koh, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Pendidikan, Bangi, Malaysia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.