ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Cognition
Sociodemographic correlates of cognitive performance in healthy children and adolescents
Provisionally accepted- 1LIFE – Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- 2German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), partner site Leipzig/Dresden, Leipzig, Germany
- 3Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- 4Department of Women and Children's Health, Hospital for Children and Adolescents and Center for Pediatric Research (CPL), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The maturation of cognitive abilities, a key aspect of childhood development, is associated with numerous outcomes later in life. Socioeconomic variables have been shown to influence this developmental trajectory. Given the growing global socioeconomic inequality, it is essential to account for socioeconomic factors when conducting research on cognitive development. While previous studies often focused on single cognitive domains and small cohorts or age groups, this study aimed to assess the association between sex, maternal education, and cognitive performance using three standard cognitive tests in a large cohort of healthy children and adolescents and to explore Tetris as a game-based cognitive test. Methods: Cognitive performance was examined in 9- to 19-year-olds using four tests (Trail Making Test, Mental Rotation Test, Continuous Performance Test, Tetris). Data were collected between October 2019 and December 2023 as part of the LIFE Child study, conducted in Leipzig (Germany), involving 770 participants for Tetris, Trail Making, and Mental Rotation, and 888 participants for the Continuous Performance Test. Multiple regression models, adjusted for age, considered sex and maternal education as independent variables. Results: Younger boys showed lower attention and inhibition control than girls, but improved during puberty, ultimately outperforming girls in the Continuous Performance Test. In Tetris, boys cleared more lines but made more rotation and movement faults than same-aged girls. No sex differences were observed in the Trail Making and Mental Rotation Test. Children of mothers with higher education made fewer errors in the Mental Rotation Test and were more attentive and less impulsive in the Continuous Performance Test than children of mothers with lower education. Tetris performance was significantly associated with the Mental Rotation and Trail Making Test. Conclusion: Cognitive performance patterns varied by sex and maternal education, highlighting the importance of distinguishing typical developmental variation from cognitive delay to guide individual support. Lower maternal education emerged as a potential risk factor for poorer cognitive performance, relevant for targeted interventions. We recommend further investigating Tetris as a game-based cognitive test.
Keywords: adolescents, Children, Cognitive tests, Continuous performance test, healthy cohort, Mental rotation test, Tetris, Trail Making Test
Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mai, Meigen, Schmidt, Ludwig, Poulain and Kiess. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Elisabeth  Mai, em94gyko@studserv.uni-leipzig.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
