Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Performance Science

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1658946

This article is part of the Research TopicNew Research in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the ArtsView all articles

Looking at People Looking at Art: Observations of Art Interactions in an Everyday Urban Environment

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2Leibniz-Institut fur Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany
  • 3Eberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Tübingen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Placing art in urban spaces can make urban public environments more attractive and colourful by offering beautiful and restorative environments; This may invite people to spend time in the area and create opportunities for social engagement, and community development. In this observational study we collaborated with "Keine Galerie" (translating to "not a gallery"), a small window gallery in the city of Vienna (Austria) to address the following questions: Does the presence of publicly available art influence people’s behaviour (in terms of type, frequency, and duration) in an urban space? Does it enhance peoples’ social interactions, such as the amount of conversations in a group? To capture the impact of presence of art, we collected data during two exhibitions by two different artists at Keine Galerie (i.e. art conditions) as well as between exhibitions when no art was visible (i.e. control condition).We used observational methods to unobtrusively assess how pedestrians who were passing through the study area interact with their environment either with or without art. Our results showed that art being present invites passers-by to interact with the space more than when no art is present (no art vs. art conditions) but also that the type of art may matter (Ex.1 vs. Ex. 2), which influenced not just the amount of interactions but also which interactions took place. We discuss these quantitative and qualitative differences, also with regard to potential confounding factors (e.g. weather), and propose avenues for further research into the impact of art in public space.

Keywords: aesthetics, Art, passers-by, urban environment, Observational study, art interactions, social engagement, Everyday Life

Received: 03 Jul 2025; Accepted: 22 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Knoll, Mikuni and Specker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anna Lena Knoll, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.