REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Personality and Social Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1662206
Techno-Emotional Projection in Human–GenAI Relationships: A Psychological and Ethical Conceptual Perspective
Provisionally accepted- 1The Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center (CINPSI Neurocog), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
- 2Neurometa and IA, Research Group, Universidad Autonoma de Chile - Campus Providencia, Santiago, Chile
- 3Innovation, Technology and Frontiers of Legal Science Laboratory (DDL), Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 4Department of Law, Universita degli Studi di Perugia Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza, Perugia, Italy
- 5Facultad de Derecho, Cátedra ISAAC (Individual Rights in Scientific Research and Cooperation), Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, Madrid, Spain
- 6Instituto Nacional de Estudios superiores en Derecho Penal, Mexico City, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is being increasingly integrated in everyday applications and devices. In this new frontier of technology interface, psychologists hold a significant role in understanding and guiding human-AI interactions. This theoretical contribution proposes a framework for the psychological and ethical dimensions of human–GenAI relationships, structured across four key dimensions: (1) individual psychological characteristics and susceptibilities, such as insecure attachment styles, low self-efficacy, and emotional dysregulation or immaturity; (2) interpersonal dynamics, including emotional projection and the illusion of reciprocity; (3) processes occurring at the group level, such as the symbolic inclusion of GenAI agents within human communities or social groups and the evolution of societal norms; and (4) emerging ethical concerns, such as perceived agency, illusory consent, and the use of synthetic data that may amplify biases, alongside the utilization and acquisition of biometric and cognitive data for interaction modeling. Within the sphere of interpersonal dynamics, we propose the concept of "Techno-Emotional Projection" (TEP) to describe how emotionally vulnerable users may project relational needs onto emotionally responsive but non-conscious technologies. This projection can lead to a sort of "emotional looping" (a recursive reinforcement of expectations through repeated interaction) and, over time, to the formation of a synthetic attachment to the GenAI technology. Drawing from psychological theories and empirical studies, we argue that these relationships have subjectively real consequences and deserve careful study. Finally, we propose directions for ethical design, emotional AI literacy, and socially responsible integration of GenAI into human life. This perspective aims to foster a balanced, informed, and human-centered approach to this rapidly evolving field.
Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence, Human-AI interaction, techno-emotional projection, Psychological dynamics, AI ethics
Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Saracini, Cornejo-Plaza and Cippitani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chiara Saracini, The Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center (CINPSI Neurocog), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.