ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Health Psychology
This article is part of the Research TopicHealth and Psychological Adaptations to Life Challenges and Stressful Conditions - Volume IIView all 14 articles
Dynamic Resilience and Adaptation among Chinese Military Veterans: Risk and Protective Factors during Transitional Periods
Provisionally accepted
- Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aim: This study aimed to construct a dynamic, stage-based model of resilience development among Chinese military veterans and to analyze the evolving mechanisms of risk and protective factors across phases of post-service reintegration. Methods: Thirty-seven veterans participated in the study. Using grounded theory, qualitative data from 25 in-depth interviews with Chinese veterans were coded and analyzed via NVivo 12.0 to construct stage-based resilience models. Theoretical saturation was tested with 12 additional cases, ensuring the validity of emergent categories and dynamic patterns of risk and protection. Results: The study revealed a five-phase dynamic mechanism of veterans' resilience, encompassing Risk Activation, Resource Empowerment, Self-Adjustment, Capability Leap, and Societal Reintegration. Each phase is marked by distinct risk trajectories, ranging from identity rupture and social detachment to cultural dissonance, role ambiguity, and fluctuations in belonging during reintegration. Protective factors evolve across these phases, shifting from relational anchors such as family and comrades to structural supports provided by institutional guidance and peer mentorship, and ultimately to an internalized sense of agency expressed through goal setting and civic responsibility. This phased structure underscores resilience as a temporally layered, identity-centered, and interaction-driven process rather than a fixed trait. The mechanism highlights transitional challenges, including unstable group belonging, emotional instability, limited access to policy resources, and difficulties in achieving social recognition during reintegration. These findings indicate that resilience development relies on cumulative interactions between risk and protection, identity fluidity, and adaptive growth, while also exposing gaps in sustained resource integration and societal validation that can compromise the stability of long-term reintegration. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that veterans' resilience is a multi-phase, structurally evolving process shaped by shifting psychosocial risks and layered protective forces. By integrating grounded data into a stage-based model, the research provides conceptual clarity and practical guidance for targeted interventions. The findings reveal the necessity of stage-specific policy design, multi-level support integration, and sustained post-transition monitoring. This work contributes to advancing resilience theory in post-service contexts and offers a culturally relevant framework to enhance long-term social reintegration of veterans.
Keywords: Veterans, resilience, Transition, adaptation, Risk factors, Protective factors
Received: 23 Jul 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Bao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lina Zhao, zhaolina@just.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.