Correction: The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom-a critical review of the literature

Xiao Ping Lin¹Bin Bin Li²Zhen Ning Yao³Yang Zhi^4,5*Ming Shu Zhang^6,7*

• ¹Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
• ²Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
• ³Graduate Department, Xi’an Physical Education University,, Xi’an, China
• ⁴The University of Melbourne Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Melbourne, Australia
• ⁵Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
• ⁶College of Commerce and Tourism, Hunan Vocational College for nationalities, Hunan Province, China
• ⁷Graduate Department, Sehan University, Yeongam County, Republic of Korea

Correction on: Lin, X. P., Li, B. B., Yao, Z. N., Yang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom-a critical review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360574 The original statement is [The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the General Topics of China's Hunan Province Social Science Achievement Evaluation Committee Fund [Grant no. The project type was not specified in the published article. In the latest revision, we clarified that it is a "Self-Funded General Project." The corrected funding statement is as follows:[This study was supported by the Social Science Achievement Evaluation Committee of Hunan Province, China (Self-Funded General Project, Grant No. XSP2023JYC123). The corresponding author, Dr. Mingshu Zhang, is the principal investigator of this project. Funding for self-funded general projects typically comes either from the investigator personally or from their affiliated institution.]The authors state that this correction does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Adding/removing text We incorporate hedging language to maintain a cautious and neutral stance while enhancing the rigor of the argument.A correction has been made to the section [Introduction, page 2, paragraph 2, lines 5-11."Some literature shows that higher education institutions are increasingly adopting VR, with adoption rates as high as 46% at US universities and 96% at United Kingdom universities (United Kingdom Authority, 2019;Agbo et al., 2021). In addition, the establishment of dedicated VR laboratories at leading universities such as Harvard University and Colorado State University underscores the commitment to using VR for educational innovation and advancement (Reid, 1987;Leidner and Jarvenpaa, 1995)."]:The revised version below incorporates hedging language： "[Recent literature indicates a growing adoption of virtual reality in higher education, with adoption rates in UK universities potentially reaching as high as 96% and several institutions in the United States being at the forefront of its implementation (United Kingdom Authority, 2019;Agbo et al., 2021). Harvard University has established dedicated VR laboratories, demonstrating its commitment to educational innovation and advancement through VR (Reid, 1987;Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995).]"The authors state that this correction does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. The reference list was missing one entry, which has now been added. The reference list is as follows: "[Farmer, L. S. & Farmer, C. J. (2023). Visual Cultural Arts as a Gateway to Digital Literacy. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher . IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6339-0.ch002]"