ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Health Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1673904
This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Health Psychology in Practice: Enhancing Well-being and Improving Health Outcomes Across Diverse ContextsView all 28 articles
Enhancing Benefit Finding and Psychological Well-being in Depression Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Group Psychoeducation in Chinese Adults
Provisionally accepted- The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province(Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability globally and is often accompanied by emotional and cognitive impairments that limit individuals' ability to perceive positive aspects of life. Within the framework of health psychology and the biopsychosocial model, meaning-based interventions such as group psychoeducation may help enhance protective psychological resources like benefit finding and overall well-being. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured psychoeducational group intervention in improving benefit finding, psychological well-being, and depressive symptoms among Chinese adults with MDD in a real-world clinical context. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design with a control group was used. A total of 114 adults diagnosed with MDD were allocated to either an intervention groups (n=57) or a control groups (n=57). The intervention group participated in 8 weekly sessions, each lasting 90 minutes. Outcome measures included the Benefit Finding Questionnaire (BFQ), the Reiff Psychological Well-being Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-test along with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: The intervention group showed significant increase in benefit finding, with mean scores rising from 57.12 ± 9.48 at pre-test to 83.33 ± 9.19 at post-test (t = 16.41, p < 0.001). No significant change was observed in the control group (pre-test: 56.39 ± 10.11; post-test: 56.17 ± 9.59 post-test; t = 0.15, p = 0.413). ANCOVA controlling for pre-test scores confirmed that post-test benefit finding scores were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (F = 28.12, p < 0.001) with a medium effect size (η² = 0.31). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in psychological well-being or depression severity between groups (p > 0.05). This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Conclusion: This study supports the integration of health psychology principles into mental health care by demonstrating that group psychoeducational interventions can effectively enhance benefit finding in individuals with depression, especially in collectivistic cultural contexts. However, longer or more intensive interventions may be required to observe broader improvements in psychological well-being and symptom reduction.
Keywords: intervention1, benefit finding2, depression3, Well-Being4, mental health5
Received: 26 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lu and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yu Xiao, yang15084976952@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.