Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Health Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1675009

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in: Health PsychologyView all 12 articles

Health Psychology in a Rapidly Changing World: Interdisciplinary Insights into Human Vulnerability and Resilience

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, United States
  • 2Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Health psychology is a multidisciplinary field that explores the complex relationships between psychological factors and physical health Taylor, 2017). This editorial addresses recent advancements in health psychology, offering insights from various studies to highlight the field's diverse and impactful nature.In an era where the socio-economic foundations of societies are evolving faster than ever before, the interconnectedness of global community has reached unprecedented levels. Technological advancements, economic shifts, and cultural exchanges are continually reshaping the way we live, work, and interact. These changes bring about both opportunities and challenges for individual and collective health and well-being (Marmot, 2005). As societies become more intertwined, the ripple effects of health-related issues can quickly transcend borders, affecting global populations as documented by recent COVID-19 pandemic (Pfefferbaum, & North, 2020). Health psychology, therefore, must adapt and respond to these dynamic changes by providing robust theoretical foundations and innovative applications aimed at protecting and enhancing individual and collective health and well-being (Glanz, Rimer, & Viswanath, K. 2015;Mohr, Weingardt, Reddy, & Schueller, 2017). By advancing our understanding of how behaviors, emotions, and social factors influence health outcomes, health psychology can offer essential insights and interventions. This involves developing comprehensive models that consider the multifaceted nature of health in a globalized world and implementing evidence-based strategies that cater to diverse populations.Innovative applications in health psychology, such as digital health interventions, communitybased programs, and policy advocacy, are vital in mitigating the adverse effects of rapid societal changes. These initiatives can provide individuals with the tools and resources needed to manage stress, enhance resilience, and maintain mental and physical health amidst evolving circumstances. Moreover, health psychology must prioritize equity, ensuring that advancements benefit all segments of society, particularly vulnerable and marginalized groups who may be disproportionately affected by socio-economic shifts (Braveman, & Gottlieb, 2014).In conclusion, as societies continue to change and become more interconnected, health psychology must rise to the occasion by offering theoretical insights and practical solutions. By doing so, it can play a pivotal role in safeguarding the health and well-being of individuals and communities worldwide, ensuring that progress in one area does not come at the expense of another.Mohiyeddini's paper emphasizes the importance of fundamental freedoms, such as speech, thought, assembly, and protection from discrimination, in maintaining psychological well-being.Restrictions on these freedoms are linked to significant psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and PTSD. The study underscores the necessity of comprehensive research to understand how different aspects of freedom interact to influence mental health outcomes.Wang et al. underscore the ripple effect of life events in triggering non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among college students, mediated by sleep disturbances and psychotic-like experiences (PLEs). The strength of this study lies in its exploration of indirect psychological pathways, suggesting that interventions should go beyond surface-level stress management and directly address sleep quality and early psychotic symptoms. It reinforces a growing call for more nuanced, systemlevel mental health interventions in academic settings.Zeng et al. shift the focus to maternal mental health and its delicate balance during childbirth. Their study identifies the "Sense of Coherence" (SOC) as a critical buffer against psychological birth trauma. Notably, this protective effect is weakened or strengthened through other psychosocial elements like fear, support, and childbirth readiness. This presents an actionable insight: cultivating psychological preparedness and structured support systems could play a decisive role in preventing trauma at one of life's most transformative moments.Chen et al.'s meta-analysis turns our attention to a population often overlooked in suicide prevention: cancer patients. Their work reveals a sobering reality-marital status, mental health history, pain, and even rural residence can significantly elevate suicide risk. The breadth and consistency of these findings demand an urgent expansion of psycho-oncological services, particularly in rural or under-resourced regions.In parallel, Ionescu et al. provide a detailed snapshot of patients with lumbar disc herniation, pointing to pain catastrophizing and unmet psychological needs as major determinants of reduced quality of life. Post-surgical changes in catastrophizing but not psychological needs suggest that physical healing alone is insufficient. The findings advocate for integrative care that includes both somatic and psychological rehabilitation.Aging populations are the subject of Cammisuli et al.'s observational study, which finds that structured physical activity improves health-related quality of life in elderly women. Emotional wellbeing and fatigue levels improved significantly, especially in the context of reduced anxiety and depression. The implication is clear: exercise, often hailed for its physical benefits, also constitutes a low-cost, high-impact mental health strategy.The psychological resources of adolescents were explored by Yu et al., who revealed that hope and psychological resilience are intimately linked, and together they shape mental health outcomes. This is not just theory-it's a clarion call for educators and policymakers to embed hope-building strategies and resilience training within school curricula. Yoo et al. venture into the neuroscience of pain, blending subjective reports with physiological indicators like pupil dilation. Their work shows that past pain influences both perception and biological responses to current pain. In doing so, they challenge purely cognitive models of pain and hint at the rich interplay between memory, emotion, and body.Finally, Liu et al. investigate the impact of social support in online health communities. Their findings suggest that physician credibility and emotional resonance drive patient engagement, while excessive praise may dilute effectiveness. This has direct implications for how digital health platforms and providers should structure feedback and reputation systems. Taken together, these studies sketch a portrait of human vulnerability that is not rooted in pathology but in context: social, relational, developmental, and even digital. They also spotlight protective factors-hope, social support, coherence-that, when nurtured, can buffer against even the most adverse circumstances. The future of mental health care must be as interdisciplinary and intersectional as the lives it aims to protect. These studies offer not only evidence, but also a roadmap.

Keywords: freedom, Health Psychology, Mental Health, Psychosocial factors, behavioral health, public health interventions

Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mohiyeddini, Zou and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Changiz Mohiyeddini, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.