ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Media Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1676899
The effects of social media addiction on college students' psychological anxiety: the mediating role of self-efficacy and coping styles
Provisionally accepted- 1Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China
- 2Zhejiang Leisure Association, Hangzhou, China
- 3hangzhou international urbanology research center & zhejiang urban governance studies center, Hangzhou, China
- 4Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Social media addiction (SMA) has emerged as a significant mental health concern among Chinese college students, particularly within the context of intense academic competition and collectivist cultural pressures. While the direct relationship between SMA and psychological anxiety is well-documented, the underlying psychological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Objective: This study investigated the complex pathways through which social media addiction influences psychological anxiety among Chinese college students, with particular focus on the mediating roles of self-efficacy and coping styles within China's unique cultural and educational context. Methods: Using stratified random sampling, 615 valid responses were collected from Chinese college students across different university types and geographic regions (response rate: 92.86%). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the relationships between SMA, self-efficacy, coping styles (positive and negative), and psychological anxiety. The quantitative analysis was supplemented with semi-structured interviews of 25 participants to provide contextual insights into the identified mechanisms. Results: The study found that social media anxiety (SMA) directly increases anxiety (β = 0.78, p < 0.001) and has indirect effects through reducing self-efficacy (β = -0.73, p < 0.001), which accounts for 23% of the total effect, and promoting negative coping strategies while undermining positive ones, contributing 20.32%. A chain mediation pathway where SMA reduces self-efficacy, affecting coping strategies, amplifies anxiety by 17%. Qualitatively, 72% reported social comparison-induced self-worth erosion, and 68% engaged in "doomscrolling," creating anxiety cycles. Conclusions: This study provides robust evidence for a multi-pathway model linking social media addiction to psychological anxiety among Chinese college students. SMA's effects go beyond direct impacts, disrupting key psychological defenses like self-efficacy and adaptive coping. The chain mediation effect exposes a concerning sequential psychological erosion, especially given the sample's high baseline anxiety (mean SAS = 63.08). These findings emphasize the need for holistic interventions targeting addiction, boosting self-efficacy, and fostering adaptive coping. They also highlight the importance of university mental health services and digital wellness programs in tackling the escalating mental health challenges faced by digitally immersed students.
Keywords: Social media addiction, Psychological anxiety, self-efficacy, Coping styles, Mediating role
Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Yu, Yu, Ni and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ruiyang Ni, 2254161730@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.