BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1676916
An Exploratory Pilot Study of Mathematics Performance Patterns: Visual Art Students versus Non-Art Students
Provisionally accepted
- Shandong Management University, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This is an exploratory pilot study designed to identify preliminary patterns in mathematics performance. A longitudinal comparative design was adopted, analyzing mathematics scores of 37 art students and 40 non-art students from a Chinese university across four consecutive semesters. Descriptive statistics characterized overall performance, independent samples t-tests (with Bonferroni correction) assessed between-group differences per semester, Pearson correlation coefficients examined intra-individual score consistency, ANCOVA (with gender as a covariate) and subgroup analyses explored gender effects, and trend analysis tracked longitudinal changes. Post-hoc power analysis confirmed sufficient power (0.809–0.899) to detect moderate effects. Non-art students demonstrated consistently higher numerical mathematics scores than art students across all semesters (75.6–78.9 vs. 70.2–73.5). After Bonferroni correction (α=0.0125), t-tests confirmed statistically significant differences only in Semester 3 (t=-2.43, p=0.017). Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to validate t-test results for Semester 2 (mixed normality) and Semester 3 (non-normal data), confirming the Semester 3 significance (U=393.5, p=0.000) and consistency of non-significant findings in Semester 2. Gender subgroup analyses revealed the gap was driven exclusively by female students (non-art: M=81.12 vs. art: M=74.56, p=0.006), while males showed no differences (p=0.963). Correlation analysis revealed stronger score stability among non-art students (r = 0.62–0.78) compared to art students (r = 0.51–0.65). Both groups showed a gradual upward trend (art: +3.3 points; non-art: +3.3 points), but the numerical performance gap remained stable (5.2–5.4 points). Preliminary patterns of persistent mathematics performance differences highlight the need for targeted support to balance artistic and academic development for art majors.
Keywords: mathematics performance, Art students, disciplinary comparison, educational psychology, longitudinal analysis, Academic trajectory
Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yu Cao, Shandong Management University, Jinan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.