SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Human Developmental Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1680267
Anxiety and autistic traits in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Autistic traits are distributed along a continuum, and some individuals exhibit subclinical characteristics without meeting diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This population, referred to as the broader autism phenotype (BAP), has been associated with increased prevalence of anxiety symptoms. Given that these individuals often do not access clinical services or receive interventions, understanding how anxiety manifests within this group is essential for improving psychological well-being and quality of life. Although research on autism and psychopathology has expanded in recent years, few studies have explored this relationship in adults with BAP from a dimensional and transdiagnostic perspective. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize recent empirical evidence on the relationship between autistic traits and anxiety symptoms in adults, and to assess whether this association is statistically significant. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Dialnet) for peer-reviewed articles published between 2013 and 2023. Studies were included if they used validated instruments to assess autistic traits (e.g., AQ, ADOS-2) and anxiety (e.g., HADS, STAI, GAD-7, BAI). A total of 18 independent samples from 13 studies were included. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated and synthesized using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also examined. Results: Findings were mixed: 55% of the included studies reported positive effect sizes and 45% negative. However, the overall effect size was not statistically significant (g = 0.0234, SE = 0.235, 95% CI: −0.438 to 0.483, p = 0.921), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I² = 99.83%). Larger studies tended to report positive associations, while smaller studies yielded negative or inconsistent effects. Inconsistencies in measurement tools, particularly across AQ versions, contributed to this variability. Conclusion: Although a significant association was not confirmed, the high heterogeneity highlights the need for more standardized approaches to evaluating autistic traits in non-clinical adult populations. These findings underscore the complexity of subclinical autism and support the relevance of transdiagnostic research frameworks to better understand its relationship with anxiety.
Keywords: autism, autistic traits, Anxiety, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 01 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Torices Callejo, Pérez Nieto and Herrero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lucía Torices Callejo, lucia.torices@ucjc.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.