There was a mistake in Table 4 as published. The regression analysis contains incomplete data, numerous blank cells, and confidence intervals that are shown as single values instead of proper ranges. In addition, several numeric values have been misaligned (e.g., lower-row values appearing in upper rows), and the adjusted R-squared value is negative after model adjustment.
 |
The corrected Table 4 appears below
Table 4
| Characteristic | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE | 95% CI | Beta | SE | 95% CI | Beta | SE | 95% CI | Beta | SE | 95% CI | |
| Q | 0.22 | 0.165 | −0.11 0.54 | 0.08 | 0.158 | −0.23 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.120 | −0.17, 0.30 | |||
| L | 0.10 | 0.106 | −0.11, 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.101 | −0.15, 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.077 | −0.14, 0.16 | |||
| F | −0.21** | 0.100 | −0.41, −0.02 | −0.19** | 0.095 | −0.38, 0.00 | −0.04 | 0.072 | −0.18, 0.10 | |||
| K | 0.11 | 0.127 | −0.14, 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.121 | −0.15, 0.32 | 0.13 | −0.23 | −0.05, 0.31 | |||
| Hs | 0.04 | 0.137 | −0.23, 0.31 | 0.01 | 0.131 | −0.24, 0.27 | 0.02 | −0.17 | −0.17, 0.22 | |||
| D | 0.11 | 0.111 | −0.11, 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.106 | −0.04, 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.08 | −0.11,0.21 | |||
| Hy | −0.03 | 0.131 | −0.29, 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.125 | −0.24, 0.26 | −0.02 | 0.095 | −0.21, 0.16 | |||
| Pd | 0.19* | 0.099 | 0.01, 0.38 | 0.12 | 0.095 | −0.06, 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.072 | −0.07, 0.21 | |||
| Mf | 0.06 | 0.068 | −0.07, 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.065 | −0.05, 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.050 | −0.08, 0.11 | |||
| Pa | −0.12 | 0.107 | −0.33, 0.09 | −0.12 | 0.102 | −0.32, 0.08 | −0.03 | 0.077 | −0.18, 0.12 | |||
| Pt | 0.27 | 0.169 | −0.06, 0.60 | 0.23 | 0.161 | −0.08, 0.55 | 0.21* | −0.123 | 0.03, 0.45 | |||
| Sc | 0.13 | 0.175 | −0.21, 0.48 | 0.06 | 0.167 | −0.27, 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.127 | −0.25, 0.25 | |||
| Ma | 0.18 | 0.118 | −0.05, 0.41 | 0.18 | 0.113 | −0.04, 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.086 | −0.13, 0.20 | |||
| Si | 0.16* | 0.089 | 0.01, 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.085 | −0.09, 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.065 | −0.11, 0.15 | |||
| Pc | 9.2*** | 1.09 | 7.0, 11 | 4.9*** | 0.836 | 3.3, 3.6 | 5.2*** | 0.829 | 3.6, 6.9 | |||
| Nc | −16*** | 1.07 | −19.−14 | −7.4*** | 0.846 | −9.0, −5.7 | −7.8*** | 0.838 | −9.4, −6.2 | |||
| CFQ-F | 1.0*** | 0.078 | 0.86, 1.2 | 1.0*** | 0.078 | 0.89, 1.2 | ||||||
| AAQ-II | 1.6*** | 0.115 | 1.4, 1.9 | 1.6*** | 0.114 | 1.4, 1.9 | ||||||
| R2 | 0.033 | 0.119 | 0.495 | 0.489 | ||||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.027 | 0.114 | 0.491 | 0.489 | ||||||||
| p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Number of observations | 2.528 | 2.528 | 2.528 | 2.528 | ||||||||
Regression model between healthy personality, psychological flexibility, coping mechanisms and mental health among participant.
*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01. SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
personality health, psychological flexibility, coping mechanisms, mental health, university students
Citation
Yang X, Ilias K, Anuar Md Isa K, Li Q, Wang H and Li H (2026) Correction: The role of healthy personality, psychological flexibility, and coping mechanisms in university students' mental health in China. Front. Psychol. 16:1680440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1680440
Received
06 August 2025
Accepted
18 September 2025
Published
29 January 2026
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Murat Yildirim, Agri Ibrahim Çeçen University, Türkiye
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Yang, Ilias, Anuar Md Isa, Li, Wang and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kartini Ilias, zm3cpm@163.com; kartini_ilias@uitm.edu.my
ORCID: Xiao Yang orcid.org/0009-0003-2371-3193; Kartini Ilias orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-1299; Khairil Anuar Md Isa orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-6476; Hai-bin Wang orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-7487
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.