Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

The rise of promotional rhetoric in Interdisciplinary field Discussion sections: a diachronic perspective

Provisionally accepted
Yumei  ZhuYumei Zhu*Xuemei  LiXuemei Li
  • Sichuan University of Arts and Science, Dazhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In recent decades, the growing competition to publish internationally has made the Discussion section increasingly promotional, as authors interpret and evaluate their findings to highlight research significance. However, this section also risks exaggerating a study’s contribution with promotional discourse. The current study examines the diachronic changes of promotional strategies in Communication research articles (RAs) Discussion sections by analyzing two corpora from 1980–1981 and 2020–2021. Drawing on Moreno’s (2021) framework of promotional steps and Hyland’s (2005) stance model, findings revealed a marked increase in the frequency of promotional steps and stance markers. The observed changes indicated a shift toward more implicit, subtle and strategical forms of persuasion. This study contributes to the study of promotional discourse in academic writing and calls for greater recognition of rhetorically modest and transparent writing practices as markers of scholarly credibility, encouraging editorial and review policies that reward integrity alongside visibility.

Keywords: promotional step, hyping stance marker, diachronic change, Interdisciplinary field, research evaluation

Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 12 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yumei Zhu, zhuyumei22@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.