Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol., 18 November 2025

Sec. Psycho-Oncology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1687754

Medical ozone treatment for pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients: a scoping review

Lei Lei&#x;Lei LeiXiaojing Xue&#x;Xiaojing XueGang Feng
Gang Feng*Xiaoyan Wang
Xiaoyan Wang*Yuan JiangYuan Jiang
  • Department of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Electronic Science and Technology University, Mianyang, China

Aim: The aim of this study is to conduct a scoping review on the application of medical ozone treatment in managing symptoms (including Pain, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Depression) among cancer patients, aiming to provide clinical medical staff with a reference for implementing a novel approach to symptom management.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on the methodology presented by Arksey and O’Malley and The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was employed to conduct scoped reviews of Pubmed, Web of science, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA and CNKI in order to address the research question: “What is the impact of medical ozone treatment on pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients?" Two independent reviewers select samples by screening and reviewing articles and extract data using a data chart form. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF.)

Results: A total of 16 articles were included to analyze and integrate the use of medical ozone, medical ozone dose, symptom assessment tools, and symptom management.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of medical ozone treatment in managing key symptoms (including Pain, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Depression) among cancer patients has been preliminarily verified. Future studies need to cover a wider range of areas and larger sample sizes, as well as conduct long-term follow-up studies and multi-dimensional evaluation to enhance the universality and reliability of the results.

1 Background

The diagnosis and treatment of cancer continue to advance, leading to improved survival rates for patients. However, with the increase in survival rates, there has also been a rise in the incidence of adverse effects experienced by cancer survivors due to cancer treatment. Among these adverse effects, anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue are commonly reported symptoms in cancer survivors (Koo et al., 2020). The study revealed that 17 and 9% of cancer survivors reported moderate to severe levels of anxiety and depression, respectively (Götze et al., 2020). Additionally, over half of the cancer survivors experienced moderate to severe pain throughout the 5-year survival period (Bennett et al., 2017). These adverse symptoms contribute to a decline in quality of life and an increase in distress among cancer survivors.

Ozone (O3), an allotrope of oxygen that consists of three oxygen atoms, is an unstable, light-blue gas with high oxidizing potential. Since it was formally defined in 1840, it has a history of nearly 200 years of research, application, and development in various fields. In medicine, it is recognized as a potent oxidizing and antimicrobial agent (Bocci et al., 2009). Medical Ozone Treatment has consequently been utilized as a complementary or adjunctive therapy for a range of conditions, including infectious, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal diseases, as well as osteoarthritis. Its clinical applications include the prevention and management of dental caries by controlling oral pathogens (Sen and Sen, 2020), and the alleviation of lumbar spine pain in adults. Research suggests that medical ozone treatment can be an effective option for relieving lumbar spine pain (Andrade et al., 2019). Furthermore, its potential role as an adjunctive therapy in anti-tumor treatment is currently under investigation. Studies have explored its potential to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy in esophageal cancer (Guo et al., 2024) and its use as ozonated water to manage chemotherapy-induced stomatitis (Hayashi et al., 2019). Most relevant to this review, several studies highlight the potential of medical ozone treatment in managing cancer-related symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, depression, and pain. However, as this review synthesizes, a significant gap remains in the establishment of standardized, guideline-driven protocols for its application in managing this specific cluster of symptoms (Elvis and Ekta, 2011).

An initial search of PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI, and MEDLINE was conducted up to October 1, 2025. This search confirmed that no prior scoping reviews on this topic exist. This gap in the literature justifies the present scoping review, which aims to map the evidence regarding the effect of medical ozone treatment on symptom management in cancer patients. The findings of this review are intended to inform future research and guide clinical practice.

2 Ethics and dissemination

This review does not require ethical approval as it is a secondary analysis of pre-existing, published data.

3 Methods

This study is a scoping review, which follows JBI method (Peters et al., 2020) and Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines (Tricco et al., 2018). The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework.1

3.1 Research question

To formulate the guiding question, the acronym PCC was used, in which “P” represents the population (Cancer patients); “C” the concept (Medical Ozone Treatment); and “C” the context (Broad, without restriction). Thus, the guiding question of this study was: What is the impact of medical ozone treatment on pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients?

3.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion:

• Study Types: Studies published in full, with no restrictions on methodological design, languages or time limits.

• Participants: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of cancer, regardless of cancer type or stage.

• Intervention: Studies investigating Medical Ozone Treatment as a primary or adjuvant intervention, regardless of administration route or dosage.

Exclusion:

• Studies not published in full text.

• Studies where the full text is unavailable despite exhaustive search efforts.

3.3 Search strategy

After defining the PCC acronym elements, two medical librarians made the search strategy in DeCS, MeSH and Emtree vocabularies. Searches in databases were created on October 5, 2025 with the help of a librarian, according to the sets of terms in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Search strategy.

4 Results

4.1 Literature screening results

The search across all databases initially identified 1,561 records. Following the removal of 749 duplicates, 812 unique records were screened based on their titles and abstracts. After this initial screening, the full text of the remaining articles was assessed for eligibility according to the pre-defined criteria. This process resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies. Figure 1 presents the PRISMA flow diagram, illustrating the complete study selection process and the reasons for exclusion at each stage.

Figure 1
Flowchart showing the identification and screening process for studies via databases and registers. Initially, 1561 records were identified, reduced to 812 after removing duplicates. Screening of 435 records led to the exclusion of 377 by title and 372 by abstract. Sixty-three reports were assessed for eligibility, with 47 excluded due to lack of full-text articles or irrelevance to medical ozone treatment. Sixteen studies were included in the review.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart for the scoping review process.

The characteristics of the 16 included studies are summarized in Table 2. Regarding chronological distribution, the majority of studies were published in 2018 (n = 3) (Li and Yao, 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Tirelli et al., 2018) and 2023 (n = 3; Tirelli et al., 2023; Clavo et al., 2023b; Clavo et al., 2023a). Other studies were published in 2011 (Lu et al., 2011), 2017 (Kang et al., 2017), 2020 (n = 2; Clavo et al., 2021b; Li, 2020), 2021 (Clavo et al., 2021a), 2022 (Clavo et al., 2022), 2024 (Su et al., 2024; Li and Pu, 2024; n = 2), and 2025 (n = 2; Clavo et al., 2025b; Clavo et al., 2025a). Geographically, nearly half of the studies (n = 7, 43.8%) originated from China, while seven (43.8%) were from Spain, and two (12.5%) were from Italy. In terms of methodological design, the majority were case series (n = 8, 50.0%), followed by randomized clinical trials (n = 6, 37.5%), and reviews (n = 2, 12.5%). It is noteworthy that seven of the included studies were authored by or co-authored by Bernardino Clavo from Spain.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. General characteristics of included literature (n = 16).

4.2 Description of systematic reviews of medical ozone treatment for cancer patients

From each included study, we systematically extracted data into predefined fields, including: tumor site, specific symptoms managed, medical ozone treatment parameters (route of administration and dosage), and assessment tools. All extracted data are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Description of systematic reviews of medical ozone treatment for cancer patients (n = 16).

4.2.1 Tumor site

The application of medical ozone treatment was assessed across a diverse spectrum of malignancies. The evidence base was predominantly derived from studies on breast cancer (n = 4 studies), with substantial contributions also from research involving pelvic region malignancies (n = 2), and colorectal/gynecological cancers (n = 2). Additional evidence was available for head and neck, lung, and lymphoid malignancies, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma. Notably, a significant portion of the included studies (n = 6) did not specify the primary tumor site, focusing instead on symptoms like chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy or cancer-related pain that were not site-specific.

4.2.2 Sample of medical ozone treatment in cancer

Our review identified that the current evidence on medical ozone treatment for cancer symptoms is primarily derived from studies with small to moderate sample sizes. As detailed in Table 3, the included studies enrolled a median of 30 participants (range: 6 to 100). While a few trials, such as those by Su et al. (2024; n = 86) and Li (2020; n = 100), reached a larger scale, the majority (10/16 studies) included 30 or fewer participants. This limitation, compounded by the predominance of case-series designs (9/16 studies) and the significant contribution of evidence from a single research group, fundamentally constrains the generalizability of the findings. Consequently, these factors collectively underscore the critical necessity for future multi-center, large-scale randomized controlled trials to robustly verify the therapeutic efficacy of medical ozone treatment.

4.2.3 Usage of medical ozone treatment

Ozone can be administered through various routes, such as major auto-hemotherapy (MAH), intramuscular, rectal insufflation, or topical application. Among the included references, Oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy was used in most studies, followed by rectal perfusion. There are few studies provide evidence to suggest that any specific method would enhance the therapeutic efficacy of ozone, but it is necessary that an appropriate route of administration should be chosen based on the patient’s condition and medical history.

4.2.4 Dose of medical ozone treatment

According to guidelines from the World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT), medical ozone treatment within the concentration range of 15–50 μg/mL is generally considered safe when administered by trained professionals. The specific dose should be customized based on the patient’s condition and the treated pathology (Li, 2020). The specific dosage within this therapeutic window must be tailored to the individual patient’s condition and the treated pathology. When administered correctly via systemic routes (e.g., autohemotherapy, rectal insufflation), side effects are typically mild and transient, and may include headache, nausea, or local discomfort at the injection site. It is crucial to emphasize that respiratory irritation is exclusively associated with the direct inhalation of ozone gas, a practice that is strictly avoided in standard medical ozone treatment protocols. This route of administration was strictly avoided in all studies included in this review, which utilized systemic methods such as autohemotherapy and rectal insufflation. Consequently, no respiratory adverse effects were reported in the evidence synthesized here.

4.2.5 Symptom management

Analysis of the included literature indicated that medical ozone treatment was primarily used to alleviate a cluster of adverse symptoms in cancer survivors, notably pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Among these symptoms, pain reduction was the most frequently reported improvement following intervention. However, the underlying mechanisms by which medical ozone treatment ameliorates these symptoms remain incompletely elucidated, underscoring the need for further investigation through multi-center, large-scale clinical trials.

5 Discussion

The advancement of cancer treatment has prolonged the survival of cancer patients; however, treatment-related adverse effects continue to pose significant challenges (Dawczak-Dębicka et al., 2022). This scoping review, based on 16 included studies, provides a broad overview of the available evidence regarding the use of medical ozone treatment as a complementary therapy for alleviating pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients. It highlights the scope of existing research and identifies areas where interventions have demonstrated potential benefits. The application of medical ozone introduces a novel approach to adjuvant cancer therapy (Re et al., 2008). It exhibits potent bactericidal properties, enhances red blood cell metabolism, activates the immune and antioxidant enzyme systems, and effectively eliminates inflammatory factors, metabolic waste, and toxic substances. Furthermore, it improves microcirculation, reduces local edema, and enhances tissue oxygen supply (Scassellati et al., 2020). This modality is increasingly recognized in clinical practice. Due to the instability of ozone gas, various administration forms are utilized in oncology, such as ozonated water or oils, major or minor autohemotherapy, and subcutaneous applications (Rowen et al., 2023). The safe dosage of medical ozone generally falls within the range of 15–50 μg/mL, as recommended by international guidelines, and is tailored based on the disease type, location, and patient condition (World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT), 2015). While medical ozone treatment shows promise in cancer care, its potential adverse effects should not be overlooked. Known side effects may include transient symptoms such as headache, nausea, or vomiting; however, respiratory irritation typically occurs only upon inhalation of ozone, which is not a typical route of administration in therapeutic settings. Regulating ozone concentration within a safe and effective range is essential to minimizing risks (İlhan and Doğan, 2021). Currently, literature on the application of medical ozone for symptom management in cancer patients remains limited, with most studies focusing on mechanistic research, safety assessments, and animal experiments. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of medical ozone as an adjunct therapy in oncology warrant attention (Lu et al., 2024). Pain is a major concern for cancer patients and often worsens with disease progression. Medical ozone may help alleviate pain by stimulating the release of enkephalins and scavenging oxygen free radicals in peripheral nerves and the spinal cord (Re, 2024). Cancer-related fatigue is another common and persistent symptom, which can endure for years post-treatment. Medical ozone, rich in oxygen, can improve blood oxygen saturation, inhibit erythrocyte sedimentation, optimize circulation, enhance erythrocyte flexibility, and thereby support physiological function, making it a viable supportive option for managing fatigue (Seledtsov and von Delwig, 2022). Affective disorders such as anxiety and depression are associated with elevated oxidative stress (Martínez-Sánchez et al., 2012). Ozone readily decomposes in the blood to form reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can act as physiological modulators and activate the body’s antioxidant system (Shen et al., 2022). These findings suggest that medical ozone treatment may represent a promising and safe adjunctive strategy in cancer management, though further large-scale clinical trials are necessary to better elucidate its role and anticancer potential.

Currently, guidelines or expert consensus on the application of medical ozone treatment for the management of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in cancer patients are still lacking. It is noteworthy that, although beyond the scope of this review, medical ozone treatment has been mentioned and assigned a recommendation grade in professional guidelines for other specific conditions, such as the management of chronic radiation proctitis (Paquette et al., 2018). This highlights the existing evidence gap between the symptom domains focused on in this review and those with preliminary guideline endorsements, underscoring the need for more high-quality studies to inform future guideline development in our areas of focus.

6 Conclusion

In conclusion, medical ozone treatment represents a promising complementary approach for managing specific cancer-related symptoms, particularly pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression, with a favorable safety profile when administered within established guidelines. Future efforts should focus on integrating it with conventional anticancer therapies to explore novel combined regimens. The current body of international literature remains limited, underscoring a significant research gap that warrants further investigation. Addressing this gap is crucial for meeting the growing need for accessible and low-cost strategies to alleviate these debilitating symptoms in cancer patients.

6.1 Study limitations

This scoping review is subject to several limitations, which primarily reflect the current state of the evidence base. First, despite our broad search, the synthesis was deliberately focused on a specific cluster of symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression). Consequently, the application of medical ozone treatment to other cancer-related symptoms falls outside the scope of this review. Second, the body of literature itself is constrained by the small number of available studies, their generally small sample sizes, and the predominance of case-series designs over robust clinical trials. Finally, the fact that a significant portion of the evidence originates from a single research group may affect the generalizability of the findings. These limitations underscore the imperative for future multi-center, large-scale trials to both broaden the symptomatic focus and strengthen the evidence base.

Author contributions

LL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XX: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GF: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Project administration. XW: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Validation. YJ: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Software.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the open Project of State Key Laboratory of Ultrasonic Medical Engineering in 2021(project no. 2021KFKT010).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

Andrade, R. R., Oliveira-Neto, O. B., Barbosa, L. T., Santos, I. O., Sousa-Rodrigues, C. F., and Barbosa, F. T. (2019). Effectiveness of ozone therapy compared to other therapies for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 69, 493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.06.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bennett, M., Paice, J. A., and Wallace, M. (2017). Pain and opioids in Cancer care: benefits, risks, and alternatives. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 37, 705–713. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_180469

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bocci, V., Borrelli, E., Travagli, V., and Zanardi, I. (2009). The ozone paradox: ozone is a strong oxidant as well as a medical drug. Med. Res. Rev. 29, 646–682. doi: 10.1002/med.20150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Cánovas-Molina, A., Díaz-Garrido, J. A., Cañas, S., Ramallo-Fariña, Y., Laffite, H., et al. (2023a). Effects of ozone therapy on anxiety and depression in patients with refractory symptoms of severe diseases: a pilot study. Front. Psychol. 14:1176204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Cánovas-Molina, A., Federico, M., Martínez-Sánchez, G., Benítez, G., Galván, S., et al. (2025a). Ozone treatment in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: a review of rationale and research directions. Cancers (Basel) 17:2278. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142278

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Cánovas-Molina, A., Ramallo-Fariña, Y., Federico, M., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Galván, S., et al. (2023b). Effects of ozone treatment on health-related quality of life and toxicity induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy in symptomatic Cancer survivors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20:1479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Navarro, M., Federico, M., Borrelli, E., Jorge, I. J., Ribeiro, I., et al. (2021a). Ozone therapy in refractory pelvic pain syndromes secondary to Cancer treatment: a new approach warranting exploration. J. Palliat. Med. 24, 97–102. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0597

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Navarro, M., Federico, M., Borrelli, E., Jorge, I. J., Ribeiro, I., et al. (2021b). Long-term results with adjuvant ozone therapy in the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain Secondary to Cancer treatment. Pain Med. 22, 2138–2141. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa459

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Galván, S., Federico, M., Martínez-Sánchez, G., Ramallo-Fariña, Y., et al. (2022). Long-term improvement by ozone treatment in chronic pain secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a preliminary report. Front. Physiol. 13:935269. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.935269

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clavo, B., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Galván-Ruiz, S., Federico, M., Cánovas-Molina, A., Ramallo-Fariña, Y., et al. (2025b). Long-term effects of ozone treatment in patients with persistent numbness and tingling secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. A retrospective study. Integr. Cancer Ther. 24:15347354241307038. doi: 10.1177/15347354241307038

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dawczak-Dębicka, A., Kufel-Grabowska, J., Bartoszkiewicz, M., Perdyan, A., and Jassem, J. (2022). Complementary and alternative therapies in oncology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:5071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Elvis, A. M., and Ekta, J. S. (2011). Ozone therapy: a clinical review. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2, 66–70. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.82319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Götze, H., Friedrich, M., Taubenheim, S., Dietz, A., Lordick, F., and Mehnert, A. (2020). Depression and anxiety in long-term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Support Care Cancer 28, 211–220. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04805-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Guo, J., Cheng, B., Gong, M., Sun, X., Zhang, H., et al. (2024). Ozone enhances the efficacy of radiation therapy in esophageal cancer. J. Radiat. Res. 65, 467–473. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayashi, K., Onda, T., Honda, H., Ozawa, N., Ohata, H., Takano, N., et al. (2019). Effects of ozone nano-bubble water on mucositis induced by cancer chemotherapy. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 20:100697. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

İlhan, B., and Doğan, H. (2021). The authors reply: ozone therapy's efficacy and complications. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 41:255. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, H. Y., Yang, J., and Dong, J. L. (2017). The effect of medical ozone autotransfusion on basic fibroblast growth factor and alpha-fetoprotein in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablationlderly liver cells after radiofrequency ablation. Mod. J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West. Med. 26, 3351–3352+3393. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2017.30.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Koo, M. M., Swann, R., McPhail, S., Abel, G. A., Elliss-Brookes, L., Rubin, G. P., et al. (2020). Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 73–79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30595-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X. X. (2020). Clinical observation of medical ozone combined with oxycodone sustained-release tablets in the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain. Cardiovasc Dis J Integr Tradit Chin West Med (Electron) 8, 40–56. doi: 10.16282/j.cnki.cn11-9336/r.2020.35.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., and Pu, R. (2024). Ozone therapy for breast Cancer: an integrative literature review. Integr. Cancer Ther. 23:15347354241226667. doi: 10.1177/15347354241226667

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H. X., and Yao, P. (2018). Medical ozone as an adjuvant therapy to oxycodone for moderate-to-severe cancer pain. China J. Mod. Med. 28, 49–53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2018.22.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y. Q., Dong, H. M., and Yang, Y. C. (2011). Nursing intervention for breast carcinoma patients with cancer——related fatigue accepting immuned ozone treatment. Chinese General Practice Nurs. 9, 97–98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2011.02.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, J., Zheng, R., Shi, Z., Gao, X., Li, Y., Fahad, A., et al. (2024). Intracellular Criegee's mechanism-based synergistic ozone therapy mediated by oleogels for cancer treatment. J. Control. Release 370, 879–890. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.05.039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez-Sánchez, G., Delgado-Roche, L., Díaz-Batista, A., Pérez-Davison, G., and Re, L. (2012). Effects of ozone therapy on haemostatic and oxidative stress index in coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 691, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.07.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paquette, I. M., Vogel, J. D., Abbas, M. A., Feingold, D. L., and Steele, S. R.Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2018). The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis. Dis. Colon Rectum 61, 1135–1140. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., and McInerney, P. (2020). “Scoping reviews” in JBI manual for evidence synthesis. ed. Joanna Briggs Institute (Adelaide: JBI).

Google Scholar

Re, L. (2024). The molecular key to understanding the medical ozone action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25:6148. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116148

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Re, L., Mawsouf, M. N., Menéndez, S., León, O. S., Sánchez, G. M., and Hernández, F. (2008). Ozone therapy: clinical and basic evidence of its therapeutic potential. Arch. Med. Res. 39, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2007.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rowen, R. J., Grabovac, S., and Su, T. B. (2023). Ozone dialysis delivers three or more times the ozone than other forms of ozone blood treatment. Med Gas Res. 13, 67–71. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.356474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Scassellati, C., Galoforo, A. C., Bonvicini, C., Esposito, C., and Ricevuti, G. (2020). Ozone: a natural bioactive molecule with antioxidant property as potential new strategy in aging and in neurodegenerative disorders. Ageing Res. Rev. 63:101138. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seledtsov, V. I., and von Delwig, A. A. (2022). Oxygen therapy in traditional and immunotherapeutic treatment protocols of cancer patients: current reality and future prospects. Expert. Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 22, 575–581. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2070153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sen, S., and Sen, S. (2020). Ozone therapy a new vista in dentistry: integrated review. Med Gas Res. 10, 189–192. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.304226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, W., Liu, N., Ji, Z., Fang, H., Liu, F., Zhang, W., et al. (2022). Combining Ozonated Autohemotherapy with pharmacological therapy for comorbid insomnia and myofascial pain syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain Res. Manag. 2022, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2022/3562191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, J. L., Yang, L., and Long, J. P. (2024). High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency combined with medical ozone water for the treatment of acute herpes zoster neuralgia in tumor patients after chemotherapy. Chin. J. Pain Med. 30, 783–787. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2024.10.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tirelli, U., Cirrito, C., Pavanello, M., del Pup, L., Lleshi, A., and Berretta, M. (2018). Oxygen-ozone therapy as support and palliative therapy in 50 cancer patients with fatigue - a short report. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 8030–8033. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201811_16432

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tirelli, U., Valdenassi, L., Franzini, M., Pandolfi, S., Fisichella, R., and Chirumbolo, S. (2023). Oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy in breast cancer patients suffering from fatigue and musculoskeletal pain upon aromatase inhibitors treatment: a case-series study. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 27, 11643–11652. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202312_34602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT) (2015) WFOT guidelines for the safe practice of ozone therapy. Available online at: https://www.wfot.org/ (accessed October 10, 2025).

Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Dong, Z. Y., Xu, Y. H., et al. (2018). Research progress on ozone immunotherapy for cancer-related fatigue. World Latest Med Inform (Electron). 18, 25–27. doi: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2018.47.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cancer, medical ozone treatment, symptoms, scoping review, ozone

Citation: Lei L, Xue X, Feng G, Wang X and Jiang Y (2025) Medical ozone treatment for pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients: a scoping review. Front. Psychol. 16:1687754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1687754

Received: 18 August 2025; Accepted: 27 October 2025;
Published: 18 November 2025.

Edited by:

Bernardino Clavo, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Spain

Reviewed by:

Lamberto Re, Medinat Sas, Italy
Gerardo Tricarico, Istituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Lei, Xue, Feng, Wang and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Gang Feng, cWlhb2Rhbjc5MzgzMjc0NEBxcS5jb20=; Xiaoyan Wang, MjczODkwMzU0QHFxLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.