PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1687884
This article is part of the Research TopicBridging Language and Consciousness: Insights from Brains, Minds, and MachinesView all articles
Information Thinking: the Transformation of Complexity and Scientific Thinking
Provisionally accepted- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Diverse interpretations of the fundamental nature of the world and its evolutionary patterns have shaped multiple paradigms of scientific and philosophical thinking. At the micro level, ontological understandings have evolved from the ancient Greek atomic theory to modern conceptions based on dynamic energy fields. At the macro level, the comprehension of evolutionary mechanisms has shifted from a teleological model of cosmic evolution to one characterized by bifurcation and chaos in complex systems. The epistemological framework that holds the world to be composed of immutable, indivisible particles with static mass is referred to as "substance thinking", whereas the view that the world consists of variable, massless energy fields is termed "energy thinking". While teleological thinking emphasizes stability and simplicity in macro-level evolutionary outcomes, bifurcation and chaos thinking highlights the variability and complexity inherent in such processes. Across both foundational constituents and evolutionary models, scientific cognition has demonstrated a clear transition from simplicity to complexity, thereby driving a paradigm shift in scientific thinking from simplicity-oriented to complexity-oriented approaches. However, the intrinsic multidimensionality and nonlinearity of complexity render it incommensurable with any single or limited set of dimensional metrics. The dialectical integration of micro-level randomness, variability, and interaction with macro-level emergence and constructive dynamics may represent the core feature of complexity. On this basis, informational thinking—grounded in the theoretical framework of information philosophy—emerges as a cognitive paradigm that interprets the essence of phenomena through structural, relational, and processual dimensions.
Keywords: The philosophy of information, informational thinking, complexity thinking, energythinking, bifurcation and chaos thinking, teleological thinking, substance thinking
Received: 18 Aug 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Zhang and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kun Wu, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.