ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Language
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1689676
This article is part of the Research TopicRethinking the Embodiment of Language: Challenges and Future HorizonsView all 6 articles
Sign Language Encodes Event Structure Through Neuromotor Dynamics: Motion, Muscle, and Meaning
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- 2University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
- 3Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study provides neuromotor evidence for the embodied kinematic encoding of grammatical event structure in sign language, using time-locked motion capture and surface electromyography (EMG) recordings from fluent Deaf ÖGS signers. Drawing on the Event Visibility Hypothesis, we examine how Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS) systematically distinguishes telic and atelic verbs through both visible kinematic parameters, as well as underlying muscle activation patterns. We show that telic signs (those denoting bounded, goal-directed events) have shorter duration, later deceleration, lower movement variability, and distinct spectral activation in forearm and upper-arm muscles, as compared to atelic verb signs. Telic signs showed greater EMG co-contraction but lower cross-correlation than atelic verb signs, reflecting temporally precise antagonistic muscle coordination, and suggesting that grammatical contrasts in sign language are produced based on finely tuned motor control schemas. These results directly address current challenges in embodiment research by demonstrating replicable, interpretable neuromotor correlates of linguistic structure in a visual-manual modality. By capturing how grammatical distinctions are produced by manual articulators, we contribute high-resolution empirical data and analysis methods toward understanding embodied language and linguistic motor control. In addition, our results support the linguistic interpretation that telic verb signs are morphologically marked in a way that atelic verb signs are not.
Keywords: Austrian Sign Language, verbs, telicity, event visibility, kinematics, Muscle activation, motion capture, Electromyography
Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Krebs, Harbour, Malaia, Wilbur, Martetschläger, Schwameder and Roehm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Julia Krebs, julia.krebs@plus.ac.at
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.