Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1693019

Development and Feasibility Pilot Study of Positive Psychological Intervention for Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in China

Provisionally accepted
Jie  YangJie Yang1Yongqi  LiYongqi Li2Xinyue  GaoXinyue Gao1*Yong-Hui  CaoYong-Hui Cao1Jing  ChenJing Chen3Ling-ling  LiuLing-ling Liu3Yi-Ru  WangYi-Ru Wang1Yue-Qin  QianYue-Qin Qian1Jing  WuJing Wu1Jing  ChuJing Chu1
  • 1Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Ruijin hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Department of Nephrology, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Psychological problems are prevalent among maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, and development of scientific, feasible and effective psychological promotion strategies can effectively improve their mental health. A series of studies were conducted to develop a group-based positive psychological intervention for MHD patients. The feasibility and effectiveness of the protocol were verified by a study. Methods A cross-sectional survey of 246, including interviews with 13 patients, was conducted to determine the status and factors influencing mental health. A scoping review of 65 studies was performed to develop a protocol for the group-based positive psychological intervention for MHD was based on the PERMA theory and lasted for 4 weeks. Furthermore, experts, medical workers and patients who completed the intervention were interviewed to refine the program. Fifty-two patients were recruited from a hemodialysis center in Shanghai from December 2023 to January 2024. The primary outcome was benefit finding (BF). The secondary outcomes were well-being, quality of life (QoL), and the accessibility and implementation of the program, which were evaluated through interviews and researcher logs. Results A total of 84 patients were recruited, 52 of whom ultimately participated in the study, including 26 patients in the intervention group and 26 patients in the control group. Twenty-four patients (92.31%) completed all interventions, and 26 patients (100%) completed more than 7 interventions. There were statistically significant differences in the intergroup effect (F=4.603, P=0.037 < 0.05), time effect (F=5.663, P=0.006 < 0.05) and interaction effect (F=4.657, P=0.015 < 0.05) of BF between the two groups. Moreover, through the intervention, the patients' well-being and QoL in terms of the physical health dimension score improved. Conclusions This study developed a group-based positive psychological intervention for MHD patients by conducting a scoping review, a cross-sectional study, qualitative interviews and expert group meetings. This study further optimized and verified the protocol of the intervention by analyzing the barriers to and facilitators of the intervention, conducting expert group meetings and performing the experiment. The intervention had a positive effect on physical and mental health for MHD patients. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300077469

Keywords: Maintenance hemodialysis, psychological intervention, Mental Health, Benefit finding, Well-being, Quality of Life

Received: 29 Aug 2025; Accepted: 02 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Li, Gao, Cao, Chen, Liu, Wang, Qian, Wu and Chu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xinyue Gao, 1410594328@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.