HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Cognition
This article is part of the Research TopicPersonality Traits and the Dual Nature of Creativity: Bright and Dark Sides ExploredView all 6 articles
Generating, evaluating, endorsing, and implementing malevolent creativity: A malevolent idea journey
Provisionally accepted
- 1University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- 2Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- 3Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Over the last years, malevolent creativity research has delved into creative ideas that intend to harm both on the smaller and larger scale (from creative bullying or deception to terrorism and warfare) in different settings (personal revenge, organizational level, crime). Here, studies have almost exclusively focused on generating/having malevolently creative ideas, either by having people self-report frequency of such ideas, or by measuring their performance on malevolent creativity tests. However, according to stage-based creativity models, (malevolent) idea generation is only one, arguably less consequential aspect of the creative process. Indeed, having harmful creative ideas does not equate assigning them a high value, endorsing them in others, nor implementing them in real-life, which is what ultimately causes societal damage. In this paper, we first summarize the previous research insights on malevolent idea generation, including links to divergent thinking, personality, emotion, and environmental factors. We then offer novel perspectives and avenues for the future of malevolent creativity research by discussing stages beyond idea generation like idea evaluation and forecasting, as well as the endorsement, selection and implementation of harmful creative ideas. Supporting our theoretical arguments, we also include hitherto unpublished research findings from our labs as a basis for discussion. Overall, this paper is intended as a springboard to discuss ways for approximating the malevolent idea journey towards actual idea implementation in malevolent creativity research, i.e., how people transition from generating malevolent creative ideas to executing malevolent creativity actions in real-life (malevolent innovation). Keywords: malevolent creativity; malevolent innovation; idea evaluation; forecasting; idea selection
Keywords: Malevolent creativity, malevolent innovation, Idea evaluation, Forecasting, Idea selection
Received: 29 Aug 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Perchtold-Stefan, Rietzschel and Baas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan, corinna.perchtold@uni-graz.at
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.