Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Clinical Application of Abdominal Breathing Training and Evaluation of Physical and Mental Benefits in Anxiety Patients

Provisionally accepted
Jiajin  ChaiJiajin Chai1Shikun  LiShikun Li1Li  HeLi He1Jiayuan  YangJiayuan Yang1Ting  WuTing Wu1Kunyan  OuKunyan Ou1Xichen  ChenXichen Chen2Kaicheng  MaKaicheng Ma1*Shouping  ZhaoShouping Zhao3*
  • 1Kunming Medical University Affiliated Mental Health Center, Kunming, China
  • 2First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
  • 3Department of Geriatrics, Kunming Medical University Affiliated Mental Health Center, Kunming, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Background: Anxiety disorders represent highly prevalent mental health conditions globally (lifetime prevalence: ~7-14%). Current pharmacological treatments carry risks of dependence and metabolic side effects, while psychological therapies face accessibility limitations. There is an urgent need to develop safe, accessible non-pharmacological interventions. This single-blind randomized controlled trial systematically evaluated the efficacy and sustainability of an 8-week standardized abdominal breathing training program in alleviating anxiety symptoms and modulating autonomic nervous function in patients with anxiety disorders. Methods: A total of 120 outpatient participants (aged 18-65 years) meeting ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (abdominal breathing training, n=60) or a control group (treatment-as-usual, n=60). The intervention group received professionally supervised training consisting of 3-4 daily sessions of 10-15 minutes each (inhale:exhale ratio = 1:2; inhalation 3-5 sec/exhalation 5-7 sec). Adherence was monitored via respiratory sensors (mean adherence rate: 92.4%). Assessments using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and physiological measurements—including heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate variability (HRV-LF/HF ratio)—were conducted at baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks), and at 4-week follow-up (intervention group only). Key Results: Anxiety Symptom Improvement: Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant group×time interaction effect on SAS scores (P<0.05). Post-intervention, the intervention group exhibited a significant reduction in SAS scores compared to baseline (67.57±8.88 vs. 71.80±3.99, P<0.001), reflecting a 5.9% decrease, and scores were significantly lower than the control group (70.43±4.33, P=0.027). At 4-week follow-up, despite a slight rebound, SAS scores in the intervention group remained significantly below baseline (68.57±8.11, P<0.05). Physiological Optimization: For physiological indicators, significant group × time interaction effects were observed (all P<0.05). Post-intervention, the intervention group showed significant reductions in heart rate (77.08±10.30 vs. 83.37±9.67 bpm), respiratory rate (17.37±1.78 vs. 18.60±1.83 breaths/min), systolic blood pressure (114.12±11.97 vs. 122.63±12.18 mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (74.40±6.75 vs. 80.28±7.58 mmHg) (all P<0.05). Concurrently, the HRV-LF/HF ratio increased significantly (P=0.008). Conclusion: Standardized abdominal breathing training significantly alleviates anxiety symptoms (effect size Cohen’s d = 0.61) and induces sustained physiological improvements in autonomic regulation (effects maintained 4 weeks post-intervention).

Keywords: Anxiety, Breathing training, rct, physiological, Abdominal breathing

Received: 01 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chai, Li, He, Yang, Wu, Ou, Chen, Ma and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kaicheng Ma, mkcheng127@qq.com
Shouping Zhao, 13108873547@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.