You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 06 October 2025

Sec. Pediatric Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1703161

Correction: Identification of preschoolers with special educational needs: comparing the discriminative validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) and the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) across different informants in Hong Kong

  • 1. Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China

  • 2. Caritas Rehabilitation Service, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Article metrics

View details

2,6k

Views

95

Downloads

There was a mistake in Table 6 as published. The T score column was missing. The corrected Table 6 appears below.

Table 6

Age Percentile Raw score T score Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Overall acc.
3 90th percentile ≥19 64 0.32 0.87 0.35 0.85 0.77
85th percentile ≥16 59 0.47 0.85 0.41 0.88 0.78
Suggested ≥13 54 0.68 0.69 0.33 0.91 0.69
4 90th percentile ≥20 64 0.33 0.90 0.33 0.90 0.82
85th percentile ≥18 61 0.47 0.83 0.30 0.91 0.78
Suggested ≥14 55 0.80 0.73 0.32 0.96 0.74
5 90th percentile ≥17 65 0.20 0.90 0.40 0.76 0.72
85th percentile ≥13 58 0.43 0.81 0.45 0.80 0.72
Suggested ≥11 54 0.73 0.72 0.48 0.89 0.72

Cutoff scores for SDQ-T total difficulties score.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

SDQ, ASEBA, preschool, behavioral and emotional problems, mental health

Citation

Wong TT-Y, Tang JW-Y, Choi PP-K and Leung TS-C (2025) Correction: Identification of preschoolers with special educational needs: comparing the discriminative validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) and the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) across different informants in Hong Kong. Front. Psychol. 16:1703161. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1703161

Received

11 September 2025

Accepted

16 September 2025

Published

06 October 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Valentina Sclafani, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Terry Tin-Yau Wong

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics