Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

This article is part of the Research TopicStress in sports: Advances in Psychological InterventionView all 5 articles

Psychological Intervention Strategies in College Physical Education and Their Impact on Students' Athletic Performance

Provisionally accepted
Wenkui  ZhangWenkui ZhangDan  WangDan Wang*Mingjun  WangMingjun WangJiang  WuJiang WuTianqi  JiaTianqi JiaXifeng  WangXifeng Wang
  • School of Big Data, Weifang Institute of Technology, Weifang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Psychological issues continue to pose a critical influence on athletic performance as well as the well-being of collegiate-level athletes, as data suggests that one-third of male varsity-level athletes and half of those at the female varsity level experience anxiety and depression. A lack of assessment of the long-term effects of psychological intervention in a collegiate athletic setting, despite the recent realization of its importance, continues to pose a significant issue. Methods: This randomized comparative effectiveness study, consisting of a sample of 324 student-athletes from a total of 12 higher education institutions, measured the differences between four psychological intervention groups that focused on attention training, cognitive restructuring, goal setting, as well as the regulation of emotions. Results: Results of MANOVA analysis indicated that attention training (AT)had a greater enhancement in performance (d=0.73) than cognitive restructuring (CR) (d=0.56) and goal setting (GS) (d=0.48). A large gender difference was observed, showing that female participants had greater improvement in emotional regulation (ER) (42.7% vs.31.4%) and psychological resilience (PR), and males had greater improvement in accuracy (36.2% vs.24.8%). Also, results of ANOVA analysis indicated a small regression in AT after twelve months ((3.2% in self-efficacy(SE), 4.3% in PR)), which was again affirmed by twelve-month results ((Resilience:92% maintenance, anxiety reduction (AR):68%)). Moreover, AT results had a large positive transfer to academic performance (AP) (r=0.43, p<0.001), where self-regulation (SR) had the highest values as a mediator (β =0.47). Discussion: Psychological integration in college-level PE lead to a large enhancement in athletic as well as academic performance. These results had a long-term positive persistence, which supports inclusion of systematic psychological skills training in athletic programs as a standard feature rather than a one-shot experience. Psychological intervention selection can be suggested according to target performance goals.

Keywords: psychological interventions, Collegiate athletes, Athletic Performance, Self-regulation, attention training, transfer effects

Received: 18 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wang, Wang, Wu, Jia and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dan Wang, ubwe2567@outlook.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.