ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psycho-Oncology
This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Psychological Care in Palliative Settings: Addressing Challenges and Enriching Patient SupportView all articles
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the MOS Social Support Survey among caregivers of patients with advanced illness receiving palliative care
Provisionally accepted
- 1Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
- 2University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
- 3Universidad de Antioquia Facultad de Enfermeria, Medellín, Colombia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Family-reported outcome measures are essential to assess the impact of illness and care on family caregivers in palliative care (PC). The Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey - MOS-SSS is widely used to measure perceived social support. However, the number of validated versions for Spanish-speaking caregivers in PC contexts remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MOS-SSS in a Colombian sample of family caregivers of patients with advanced illness receiving palliative care. Methods: A psychometric cross-sectional study was conducted with caregivers of patients with cancer and heart failure receiving PC in two hospitals in Medellín-Colombia. The instrument was administered through structured interviews conducted by trained researchers. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Internal consistency, stability, convergent and known-groups validity, and sensitivity to change were evaluated. The analyses followed COSMIN guidelines. Results: A total of 434 family caregivers (mean age = 45.7 ± 14.6 years; 86 % female) of patients receiving PC were included. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor model with acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.043), although a high covariance was observed between the domains of positive social interaction and affectionate support (r = 0.899). An EFA revealed a three-factor model with acceptable fit and theoretical coherence (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.920, RMSEA = 0.073, and SRMR = 0.044). Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.94, and McDonald's Omega was 0.96. Stability was good to excellent (0.85–0.89). Convergent validity was confirmed using the Quality of Life in Life Threatening Illness-Family Carer Version scale (rho = 0.426, p < 0.001), and known-groups validity showed lower scores among sole caregivers. The scale was not sensitive to changes following a brief educational intervention. Discussion: The Spanish version of the MOS-SSS demonstrated strong psychometric properties for assessing perceived social support in family caregivers within PC. The findings support its use in clinical and research settings in Latin American contexts. Future research should explore the responsiveness of interventions explicitly designed to modify the social support networks of caregivers.
Keywords: Caregivers, social support, Psychometrics, Palliative Care, Health Care Surveys
Received: 30 Sep 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Carreño-Moreno, Arias-Rojas and Rojas-Reyes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mauricio Arias-Rojas, emauricio.arias@udea.edu.co
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.