Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Measurement Validity in Clinical and Dynamic PsychologyView all 10 articles

Is the MMSE enough for MCI? A Narrative Review of the usefulness of the MMSE

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Studies G. d'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • 2Universita degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a clinical condition characterized by a decline in cognitive functions greater than expected for an individual's age and educational level, yet not severe enough to significantly interfere with daily activities. Early identification of MCI is crucial for targeted interventions, monitoring symptom progression, and implementing appropriate therapeutic or support strategies. In clinical practice, screening tools are often used that show clear limitations in sensitivity and in their ability to detect mild cognitive alterations. Methods Although the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is among the most widely used tools for initial assessment in non-specialist settings, it presents significant psychometric limitations in identifying MCI. A critical analysis of its effectiveness is therefore essential to guide an informed choice of assessment instruments Results: A narrative review of the literature suggests that the MMSE shows reduced sensitivity in detecting MCI, with a tendency to underestimate mild cognitive deficits. Specific cognitive domains are insufficiently captured by the MMSE compared to more sensitive tools. Conclusions: In light of these limitations, this review highlights the need to adopt alternative cognitive tests for the early detection of cognitive impairment.

Keywords: mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Early detection, cognitive impairment, Diagnostic accuracy

Received: 18 Oct 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 D'Ignazio, Carlucci, SERGI, Palumbo, Dattilo, Terrei and Balsamo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Giorgia D'Ignazio, giorgia.dignazio@phd.unich.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.