Incel, Redpill and Blackpill: Addressing the Psychological and Behavioral Complexity of Misogynistic Online Communities

  • 2,235

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Summary Submission Deadline 30 March 2026 | Manuscript Submission Deadline 27 July 2026

  2. This Research Topic is currently accepting articles.

Background

The field of clinical psychology is encountering an intricate challenge with the rise of “incel” (involuntary celibate) communities. These groups may be identified by traits such as social isolation, maladaptive belief systems, and a potential risk for online or real-world aggression, against women, feminist groups. Recent studies indicate a high prevalence of depression, anxiety, social paranoia, victimhood and insecure attachment patterns among individuals who identify with incel ideology. These psychological characteristics may increase the likelihood of self-harm and interpersonal violence, both online and offline prompting an urgent need for informed clinical responses and tailored therapeutic interventions. Moreover, incel communities have spread all over the world, also evolving in “redpill” and “blackpill” subculture, characterized by misogynistic views and anti-feminist movement.

This Research Topic aims to expand the understanding and clinical dialogue surrounding the incel-redpill phenomenon by addressing essential questions. What are the consistent psychological markers among those identified as incel or those who identify with the ideology? How effective are clinical approaches such as cognitive-behavioral therapies, trauma-informed care, psychoeducation and group interventions at reducing violence risk and promoting psychological well-being? Additionally, how can existing interventions be adapted to effectively address the unique social and digital environments in which these communities exist?

To gather further insights into this complex issue, the Research Topic seeks submissions that explore:
• Assessment and diagnosis of psychological comorbidities in incel-affiliated individuals.
• Case studies of successful (or unsuccessful) clinical interventions within this demographic.
• Development of risk assessment tools and early identification strategies for mental health professionals.
• Interdisciplinary approaches, particularly collaborations with digital platforms or community organizations.
• Examination of the social, cultural, and political factors influencing incel identity formation, with implications for prevention and public policy.

In exploring the psychological dynamics that underpin the incel-redpill phenomenon, this Research Topic aims to identify effective clinical responses and address significant gaps in current practices. The ultimate goal is to empower clinicians as well as educators with practical knowledge that can help reduce harm and support at-risk individuals within clinical settings and further afield.

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Clinical Trial
  • Community Case Study
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • FAIR² Data

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: incel, incel psychology, involuntary celibate, clinical psychology, clinical intervention, risk, prevention, social isolation, online communities

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Topic coordinators

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 2,235Topic views
View impact