Abstract
A model solvent, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, was encapsulated using coordination assembly between metal ions and tannic acid to reveal the deposition of coordination complexes on the liquid-liquid interface. The deposition was confirmed by zeta potential, energy dispersive spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were integrated to characterize the microcapsules (MCs). According to atomic force microscopy height analysis, membrane thickness of the MCs increased linearly with sequential deposition. For MCs prepared using the Fe3+-TA system, the average membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared with 2, 4, 6, and 8 deposition cycles were determined as 31.3 ± 4.6, 92.4 ± 15.0, 175.4 ± 22.1, and 254.8 ± 24.0 nm, respectively. Dissolution test showed that the release profiles of all the four tested MCs followed Higuchi kinetics. Membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared using the Ca2+-TA system were much smaller. We can easily tune the membrane thickness of the MCs by adjusting metal ions or deposition cycles according to the application requirements. The convenient tunability of the membrane thickness can enable an extensive use of this coordination assembly strategy in a broad range of applications.
Introduction
Microencapsulation technology is a promising approach that has been widely reported to protect sensitive core materials, including but not limited to chemicals and living biomaterials (Parthasarathy and Martin, 1994; Anderson and Shive, 2012; Tong et al., 2012; Li B.-X. et al., 2017). The past few decades have seen significant advances of microencapsulation in drug delivery (Wang et al., 2006; De Koker et al., 2012; Simoes et al., 2015; Jia et al., 2017; Li H. et al., 2017), material industry (White et al., 2001; Su and Schlangen, 2012; Jamekhorshid et al., 2014), biomaterials (Parthasarathy and Martin, 1994; Zhi and Haynie, 2006; Kurayama et al., 2012; Ekanem et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017), agrochemicals (Li et al., 2016, 2018; Liu et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2017), food industry (Xu et al., 2013), and other fields. There are numerous encapsulation methods focusing on in situ polymerization (Su et al., 2013; Zuo et al., 2014), interfacial polymerization (Wagh et al., 2009), spray drying (Zhang and Zhong, 2013), solvent evaporation (Lee et al., 2012) and so on. However, these methods show some drawbacks in terms of financial cost, time cost, simplicity or environmental compatibility, as listed in Table 1. Thus, more environmentally friendly and versatile methods are urgently required.
Table 1
| Encapsulation method | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|
| In situ polymerization | Inexpensive wall materials and simple manufacturing equipment (Sukhorukov et al., 2001) | Highly complex procedure (Fan and Zhou, 2010); An important precursor, formaldehyde, has a pungent smell and high toxicity for higher animal life (Cassee et al., 1996; Zuev et al., 2013) |
| Interfacial polymerization | Simple process and lower emphasis on monomer purity (Wagh et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2018a) | Time-consuming; high cost of polymer monomer (Li et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016) |
| Spray drying | Simple procedure (Wang et al., 2016) | High energy consumption (Aghbashlo et al., 2012) Low encapsulation efficiency (Varona et al., 2013) |
| Solvent e vaporation | Simple procedure (Fan et al., 2014) | Low drug-loading efficiency (Lee et al., 2012) |
Advantages and disadvantages of various encapsulation methods.
In recent years, coordination complexes utilizing metal ions and natural products have attracted extensive interest from the scientific community due to their high environmental compatibility (Bentley and Payne, 2013; Ejima et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Rahim et al., 2016). These materials can be assembled onto planar or particulate substrates with a range of functionalities, including enhanced mechanical stability selection, permeability, and stimuli-responsiveness (Rahim et al., 2014; Ping et al., 2015; Ejima et al., 2016; Richardson et al., 2016). However, few reports had explored the deposition of such materials on a liquid-liquid interface. Since the interfacial properties of the liquid-liquid interface and the solid-liquid interface differ significantly, the deposition process of coordination complexes may be very different. Therefore, urgent exploration is required to characterize the deposition process based on the liquid-liquid interface.
Microcapsules (MCs) prepared with these polymers always release slowly in target sites because the polymers can hardly degrade in water, soil, or air (Zhang et al., 2016). However, in addition to long-term effectiveness, a rapid efficacy of core materials is also required in many situations, such as the rapid activity in emergency medicine and rapid insecticidal efficacy in agriculture. Moreover, the residual and other unforeseeable risks of core materials in the environment also increase due to the slow release of core materials after the encapsulation (Li et al., 2014). Release profiles of MCs in conventional systems have often been regulated by the membrane thickness, particle size, pore size, membrane permeability or stimuli-gated channels (Siepmann and Siepmann, 2012; Jeong et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014, 2018b; Shi et al., 2016; Cui et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2017). The fabrication of wrinkled MCs is another important strategy for increasing the surface area of the membrane, but little progress was observed in terms of the release rate (Ina et al., 2016). MCs prepared with coordination complexes were reported to degrade faster and the release of core materials was pH-responsive (Ejima et al., 2013). Thus, we would like to provide strategies for achieving the tunable membrane thickness of MCs by using coordination assembly.
As proof, we report the formation of metal-polyphenol networks on the liquid-liquid interface using 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as a model core material. The deposition was confirmed by zeta potential, EDS and XPS. SEM, TEM, and AFM were also integrated to characterize the MCs. We have thus provided convenient strategies for obtaining a tunable membrane thickness of MCs by using coordination assembly.
Materials and methods
Reagents
The solvent 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (purity of 97%), and the wall materials tannic acid (TA) (C76H52O46, AR), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, ACS), and calcium chloride anhydrous (CaCl2, ACS) were all purchased from Aladdin Reagent Co. Ltd., (Shanghai, China). Calcium lignosulfonate was purchased from Yanbian Chenming Paper Industry Co., Ltd., (Jilin, China). Sodium lignosulfonate with the molecular weight of 10,000–12,000, and sulfonation degree of 0.85 mmol g−1 was purchased from MeadWestvaco Holding Co. Ltd., (Shanghai, China). Distilled water was used throughout the study.
Preparation of solvent-loaded MCs
The standard procedure used in this work is as follows: in the first step, 30.93 g of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene was accurately weighed as the organic phase. Then 1 g of surfactant was dissolved in 40 g of water to obtain the aqueous continuous phase. After pouring the organic phase into the aqueous continuous phase, homogenization at 10,000 rmin−1 was implemented with a homogenizer (BRT-25w, Shanghai BRT Equipment Technology CO., Ltd., Shanghai, China) to fabricate a fine emulsion. Subsequently, the mixture was transferred to magnetic stirring at 1,000 r min−1. Solutions of FeCl3·6H2O (or CaCl2 for the Ca2+-TA system) and TA were then added to deposit on the oil-water interface. Finally, we obtained solvent-loaded MCs after reaction for another 5 min.
Characterization of solvent-loaded MCs
Surface zeta potentials of the samples were measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, UK). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Quanta 250 SEM instrument (FEI, USA) operated at the acceleration voltage of 20 kV. Energy dispersive spectroscopy data were obtained using an X-Max EDS system (Oxford Instruments, UK). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired using a JEM-2100 TEM (JEOL Ltd., Japan) with an operational voltage of 200 kV. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments were conducted using a Bruker Multimode 8 scanning probe microscope (Bruker Corporation, German). Tapping mode was used in AFM scans, and the system was equipped with a recommended RTESP probe. Prior to the AFM measurements, core materials encapsulated in MCs were dissolved in excessive methanol solution to yield hollow MCs. Then, hollow MCs were allowed to air-dry for 48 h on mica discs prior to height analysis (Ted Pella, Inc., California, USA). Membrane thicknesses of the air-dried MCs were analyzed using Nanoscope Analysis image processing software (v1.40, Bruker Corporation). Release profiles of the MCs were measured according to previously reported protocols (Cui et al., 2017).
Results and discussion
Preparation and characterization of MCs prepared using Fe3+ and TA
To describe the deposition of metal-polyphenol networks on the liquid-liquid interface, we used 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as a model core material because it is a common hydrophobic solvent. Successful deposition on 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene would provide a reference for various capsule suspensions used in agrochemicals and food chemistry, where hydrophobic chemicals are always encapsulated. Unlike coating on planar or particulate substrates (Ejima et al., 2013), we need a suitable emulsifier to fabricate a fine emulsion with a certain size distribution before the deposition process. Anionic surfactants, such as calcium lignosulfonate and sodium lignosulfonate, showed favorable emulsification. Moreover, the coordination complexes could deposit on the liquid-liquid interface when using calcium lignosulfonate as the surfactant.
We have previously reported that when Fe3+ was added first, the final pyraclostrobin-loaded MCs tend to be relatively smooth, whereas MCs are prone to agglutinate when TA was first added (Li B.-X. et al., 2017). Therefore, we used the addition sequence of Fe3+ + TA + Fe3+ + TA + Fe3+…in the current study. When 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and calcium lignosulfonate were used, we obtained a gray and white fine emulsions. Thereafter, the emulsion became gray after the addition of 1 ml of 0.12 mol l−1 Fe3+ solution. Meanwhile, addition of Fe3+ shifted the surface zeta potential (ζ) from −45.4 ± 3.6 mV to −35.1 ± 3.2 mV. Subsequently, the mixture turned blue and then black after the gradual addition of all of the 2 ml TA solution (0.03 mol l−1). Finally, we successfully fabricated solvent-loaded MCs after the sample was centrifuged at 2,000 r min−1 for 1 min, removed the supernatant and added distilled water to redisperse the remained MCs. The above process was defined as one cycle. Next, we had investigated whether multilayered membrane could be deposited on the liquid phase by repeating the standard process. Another addition of Fe3+ solution (1 ml, 0.12 mol l−1) made it 1.5 cycles and shifted ζ from −42.2 ± 4.1 mV to −37.3 ± 3.2 mV. Two cycles finished as soon as 2 ml of TA solution (0.03 mol l−1) was added, centrifuged and redispersed. As depicted in Figure S1, surface ζ varied greatly with deposition cycles although the values were always negative. Absolute values of zeta potential (|ζ|) increased as soon as TA was added at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 deposition cycles (compared with the former addition of Fe3+), which was attributed to the acidic nature of the galloyl groups in TA. However, overall, the gradual decreases in |ζ| could be apparently observed with the deposition cycles; |ζ| decreased to approximately 25 mV after 5 cycles, significantly lower than that of the first few cycles (approximately 36 mV). In the fundamental theory of collochemistry, lower |ζ| was demonstrated to yield worse colloidal stability (Feng et al., 2010). Therefore, we deduced that the system became relatively unstable with the increasing deposition cycles.
The presence of TA and Fe in the membrane was then confirmed by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The EDS spectra of representative 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs confirmed the existence of C, O, S, Cl, Ca and Fe (Figure S2A), and element composition is described in Table S1. The C and O mainly originated from tannic acid, whereas S and Ca originated from the calcium lignosulfonate molecules. The Cl and Fe elements were derived from the addition of the FeCl3 solution. However, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) only confirmed the presence of O, C and Cl (Figure S2B). We supposed that the signal of Fe2p was masked due to the complicated composition of the MCs and smaller penetration depth of XPS in comparison with EDS. Ejima et al. (2013) also indicated that the Fe2p signal was weak in a similar system.
The MCs deposited for different cycles also showed differences in physical stability. Figure 1 shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs prepared with different numbers of deposition cycles. As depicted in the images, all of the samples had an average size of approximately 3 μm. It is apparent that no MCs deposited for 1 cycle could preserve a relatively stable spherical shape. Additionally, apparent folds and creases could be observed for nearly all collapsed MCs. The membrane thickness and strength are prone to increase with sequential deposition, although no significant improvement was observed until deposition for 4 cycles. Fortunately, nearly all MCs can retain stable spherical shapes after we implemented 8 deposition cycles, even though aggregates composed of 2–6 MCs were prevalent in the sample. This also confirmed our aforementioned hypothesis about the instability of the system with increased deposition cycles derived from the variation in the zeta potential. Furthermore, the membrane surfaces of the MCs were covered with small protuberances or particles, indicating a disordered deposition of wall materials.
Figure 1
As was extensively reported, mechanical strength of MCs shows direct correlation with membrane thickness. In this research, membrane thickness and the morphology of MCs were determined by using TEM. SEM images showed that MCs may maintain stable shapes after deposition for 4 cycles, and we therefore selected MCs deposited for 4 and 8 cycles as a model for TEM observation. As illustrated in Figure 2, the surface of MCs deposited for 4 cycles was smooth, whereas that of the MCs deposited for 8 cycles appears rough and prone to agglutination, consistent with SEM images. In addition, many protuberances were observed in the TEM images of 8 deposition cycles. Fortunately, the membrane thickness of MCs could be roughly estimated. For twenty MCs, the membrane thicknesses of MCs deposited for 4 cycles ranged between 62 and 212 nm (128 ± 35 nm), whereas that for 8 cycles ranged between 183 and 492 nm (318 ± 87 nm). Clearly, the membrane thicknesses were much larger than that reported by Ejima et al. (2013) on polystyrene particles (membrane thickness was approximately 40 nm for MCs at 4 cycles). We suppose that the presence of calcium lignosulfonate in the current study greatly contributed in the membrane deposition process and therefore increased the membrane thickness of the MCs.
Figure 2
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was extensively reported to provide high-resolution simulated topographical images by meticulously analyzing surface height data. In the current study, methanol was used for dissolution of core materials in the MCs to yield hollow MCs before the AFM measurements. Consequently, typical collapses of the MCs were observed in all AFM images, as depicted in Figures 3a–d. Corresponding amplitude error images also indicated that the surface of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs was relatively smooth at 2 and 4 deposition cycles, while creases and rough surfaces were observed for MCs with 6 and 8 deposition cycles (Figures 3e–h). Then, relatively flat regions of the collapsed MCs in the AFM images were selected to determine the average membrane thicknesses of the MCs. Figures 3i–l illustrate the representative height analysis profiles of MCs prepared with different numbers of deposition cycles. Membrane thicknesses of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs were measured by examining 20 MCs by AFM height analysis. The average membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared with 2, 4, 6 and 8 deposition cycles were determined as 31.3 ± 4.6, 92.4 ± 15.0, 175.4 ± 22.1 and 254.8 ± 24.0 nm, respectively.
Figure 3
As depicted in Figure 4A, the membrane thickness of the MCs increased linearly with the deposition cycles, yielding a regression equation of y = 37.67x−49.91 (R2 = 0.995). We noticed that the membrane thickness values of the MCs measured by AFM were slightly inconsistent with the values obtained by TEM observation. We attributed the inconsistence to the tiny discrepancy in the sampling process. As we have seen in the SEM and TEM images, a certain amount of agglomerated MCs are present in the sample. However, we cannot measure the membrane thicknesses of agglomerated MCs due to the limitation of the AFM probe. As we had selected tapping mode for the AFM scans, the recommended AFM probe of the system was the RTESP probe. The cantilever of the probe has the thickness of 3.5–4.5 μm, length of 115–135 μm and width of 30–40 μm. The probe can hardly approach the surface of the agglomerated MCs because the height of the agglomerated MCs can easily exceed the thickness of the probe and thus leads to unsuccessful measurements. For a next-best option, we measured the thickness of MCs with relatively better dispersibility. Therefore, membrane thicknesses of the MCs measured by AFM analysis were slightly smaller than those measured by TEM observation because the well-dispersed MCs show fewer or smaller protuberances. In addition, the existence of the protuberances might also be the cause of higher standard deviations of the membrane thicknesses of MCs with larger deposition cycles (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Figure 4B displays the release profiles of the MCs in artificial release medium. Although initial burst releases were observed for all the tested MCs, sequential deposition revealed significant advantages in controlled-release of the core material. The MCs with 8 deposition cycles released 35.5 ± 0.6% of the active ingredient in initial burst stage, whereas those with 2 deposition cycles dissolved 52.9 ± 1.3% of the active ingredient. Subsequently, the dissolution data of the core material vs. time were submitted to fit with zero-order, first-order and Higuchi models. The modeling results suggested that the release profiles of all the four tested MCs followed Higuchi kinetics as they yielded the highest determination coefficients (Table S2).
Preparation and characterization of MCs prepared using Ca2+ and TA
We had also preliminarily investigated whether the type of metal ions influenced the deposition process. Thus, we used the Ca2+-TA network for the deposition on the solvent-water interface. Subsequently, we obtained a series of MCs prepared with Ca2+-TA by simply replacing Fe3+ with Ca2+ in the system. AFM height analysis images (Figures 5a–e) and amplitude error images (Figures 5f–j) indicate that 1,3,5-Ttrimethylbenzene-loaded MCs deposited with Ca2+-TA were much smoother than those prepared using the Fe3+-TA system. Corresponding representative height analysis profiles of MCs prepared with different numbers of deposition cycles are depicted in Figures 5k–o. Membrane thicknesses of the MCs were also measured by examining 20 MCs for each sample. The average membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared with 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 deposition cycles were determined as 10.0 ± 1.1, 22.0 ± 2.5, 30.5 ± 3.3, 43.0 ± 4.5 and 59.7 ± 7.3 nm, respectively. As shown in Figure S1, the membrane thickness of the MCs also increased linearly with the sequential deposition cycles, as characterized by the regression equation of y = 12.02x−3.043 (R2 = 0.986).
Figure 5
Conclusions
The common solvent 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene was used as a model solvent for encapsulation using coordination assembly between metal ions and tannic acid. Zeta potential, energy dispersive spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy demonstrated the deposition of Fe3+-TA complexes on the solvent-water interface. According to atomic force microscopy height analysis, membrane thickness of the MCs increased linearly after sequential deposition. We can easily tune the membrane thickness of the MCs by adjusting metal ions or deposition cycles according to the application requirements.
Statements
Author contributions
BL designed all the experiments, performed the preparation of the microcapsules and wrote the manuscript. XL and YL performed the SEM and TEM measurements. DZ and JL performed the AFM measurement and dissolution test. WM and FL supervised all the experiments and revised the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772203) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0200307; 2016YFD0200500).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00387/full#supplementary-material
Table S1Detailed information about the element composition of representative 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs is listed in this table.
Table S2Displays the fitness of the release profiles of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs to different models.
Figure S1Shows the zeta potential of samples prepared with different deposition cycles.
Figure S2Displays the energy dispersive spectroscopy image and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs.
Figure S3Describes the membrane thicknesses of 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs (prepared with Ca2+-TA) by measuring 20 MCs via AFMheight analysis.
References
1
AghbashloM.MobliH.RafieeS.MadadlouA. (2012). Optimization of emulsification procedure for mutual maximizing the encapsulation and exergy efficiencies of fish oil microencapsulation. Powder Technol. 225, 107–117. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.040
2
AndersonJ. M.ShiveM. S. (2012). Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.64(Suppl.), 72–82. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.004
3
BentleyW. E.PayneG. F. (2013). Nature's other self-assemblers. Science341, 136–137. 10.1126/science.1241562
4
CasseeF. R.StenhuisW. H.GrotenJ. P.FeronV. J. (1996). Toxicity of formaldehyde and acrolein mixtures: in vitro studies using nasal epithelial cells. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 48, 481–483. 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80060-1
5
CuiK.-D.LiB.-X.HuangX.-P.HeL.-M.ZhangD.-X.MuW.et al. (2017). A versatile method for evaluating the controlled-release performance of microcapsules. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects529, 80–87. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.060
6
De KokerS.HoogenboomR.De GeestB. G. (2012). Polymeric multilayer capsules for drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev.41, 2867–2884. 10.1039/c2cs15296g
7
EjimaH.RichardsonJ. J.CarusoF. (2016). Metal-phenolic networks as a versatile platform to engineer nanomaterials and biointerfaces. Nano Today12, 136–148. 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.12.012
8
EjimaH.RichardsonJ. J.LiangK.BestJ. P.van KoeverdenM. P.SuchG. K.et al. (2013). One-step assembly of coordination complexes for versatile film and particle engineering. Science341, 154–157. 10.1126/science.1237265
9
EkanemE. E.ZhangZ.VladisavljevićG. T. (2017). Facile microfluidic production of composite polymer core-shell microcapsules and crescent-shaped microparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci.498, 387–394. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.067
10
FanC.ZhouX. (2010). Influence of operating conditions on the surface morphology of microcapsules prepared by in situ polymerization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects363, 49–55. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.04.012
11
FanT.FengJ.MaC.YuC.LiJ.WuX. (2014). Preparation and characterization of porous microspheres and applications in controlled-release of abamectin in water and soil. J. Porous Mater. 21, 113–119. 10.1007/s10934-013-9754-7
12
FengJ. G.Fu-SuiL. U.ChenT. T.ZhangS. Q.HuiL. I. (2010). Effect of copolymer dispersant on the dispersion stability of flufenoxuron suspension concentrate. Chem. J. Chin Univ. 31, 1386–1390.
13
GuoJ.PingY.EjimaH.AltK.MeissnerM.RichardsonJ. J.et al. (2014). Engineering multifunctional capsules through the assembly of metal–phenolic networks. Angew. Chem.126, 5652–5657. 10.1002/ange.201311136
14
HuangX.WuS.KeX.LiX.DuX. (2017). Phosphonated pillar[5]arene-valved mesoporous silica drug delivery systems. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 19638–19645. 10.1021/acsami.7b04015
15
InaM.ZhushmaA. P.LebedevaN. V.Vatankhah-VarnoosfaderaniM.OlsonS. D.SheikoS. S. (2016). The design of wrinkled microcapsules for enhancement of release rate. J. Colloid Interface Sci.478, 296–302. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.022
16
JamekhorshidA.SadrameliS. M.FaridM. (2014). A review of microencapsulation methods of phase change materials (PCMs) as a thermal energy storage (TES) medium. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev.31, 531–542. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.033
17
JeongW.-C.KimS.-H.YangS.-M. (2014). Photothermal control of membrane permeability of microcapsules for on-demand release. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces6, 826–832. 10.1021/am4037993
18
JiaJ.WangC.ChenK.YinY. (2017). Drug release of yolk/shell microcapsule controlled by pH-responsive yolk swelling. Chem. Eng. J. 327, 953–961. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.170
19
KurayamaF.SuzukiS.BahadurN. M.FurusawaT.OtaH.SatoM.et al. (2012). Preparation of aminosilane–alginate hybrid microcapsules and their use for enzyme encapsulation. J. Mater. Chem.22, 15405–15411. 10.1039/c2jm31792c
20
LeeM. H.HribarK. C.BrugarolasT.KamatN. P.BurdickJ. A.LeeD. (2012). Harnessing interfacial phenomena to program the release properties of hollow microcapsules. Adv. Funct. Mater.22, 131–138. 10.1002/adfm.201101303
21
LiB.GuanL.WangK.ZhangD.WangW.LiuF. (2016). Formula and process optimization of controlled-release microcapsules prepared using a coordination assembly and the response surface methodology. J. Appl. Polym Sci. 133:42865. 10.1002/app.42865
22
LiB.RenY.ZhangD.-X.XuS.MuW.LiuF. (2018). Modifying the formulation of abamectin to promote its efficacy on southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) under blending-of-soil and root-irrigation conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem.66, 799–805. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04146
23
LiB.WangK.ZhangD.ZhangC.GuanL.LiuF. (2013). Factors that affecting physical stability of high content pendimethalin capsule suspension and its optimization. Chin. J. Pest. Sci.15, 692–698. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7303.2013.06.15
24
LiB.ZhangD.ZhangC.GuanL.WangK.LiuF. (2014). Research advances and application prospects of microencapsulation techniques in pesticide. Chin. J. Pest. Sci.16, 483–496. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7303.2014.05.01
25
LiB.-X.WangW.-C.ZhangX.-P.ZhangD.-X.RenY.-P.GaoY.et al. (2017). Using coordination assembly as the microencapsulation strategy to promote the efficacy and environmental safety of pyraclostrobin. Adv. Funct. Mater.27:1701841. 10.1002/adfm.201701841
26
LiH.JiaY.FengX.LiJ. (2017). Facile fabrication of robust polydopamine microcapsules for insulin delivery. J. Colloid Interface Sci.487, 12–19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.012
27
LiangY.GuoM.FanC.DongH.DingG.ZhangW.et al. (2017). Development of novel urease-responsive pendimethalin microcapsules using silica-IPTS-PEI as controlled release carrier materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.5, 4802–4810. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00208
28
LiuB.WangY.YangF.WangX.ShenH.CuiH.et al. (2016). Construction of a controlled-release delivery system for pesticides using biodegradable PLA-based microcapsules. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces144, 38–45. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.084
29
ParthasarathyR. V.MartinC. R. (1994). Synthesis of polymeric microcapsule arrays and their use for enzyme immobilization. Nature369, 298–301. 10.1038/369298a0
30
PingY.GuoJ.EjimaH.ChenX.RichardsonJ. J.SunH.et al. (2015). pH-responsive capsules engineered from metal–phenolic networks for anticancer drug delivery. Small11, 2032–2036. 10.1002/smll.201403343
31
RahimM. A.BjörnmalmM.SumaT.FariaM.JuY.KempeK.et al. (2016). Metal–phenolic supramolecular gelation. Angew. Chem.128, 14007–14011. 10.1002/ange.201608413
32
RahimM. A.EjimaH.ChoK. L.KempeK.MüllnerM.BestJ. P.et al. (2014). Coordination-driven multistep assembly of metal–polyphenol films and capsules. Chem. Mater.26, 1645–1653. 10.1021/cm403903m
33
RichardsonJ. J.CuiJ.BjörnmalmM.BraungerJ. A.EjimaH.CarusoF. (2016). Innovation in layer-by-layer assembly. Chem. Rev.116, 14828–14867. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00627
34
ShiJ.WangX.XuS.WuQ.CaoS. (2016). Reversible thermal-tunable drug delivery across nano-membranes of hollow PUA/PSS multilayer microcapsules. J. Memb. Sci.499, 307–316. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.065
35
SiepmannJ.SiepmannF. (2012). Modeling of diffusion controlled drug delivery. J. Control. Release161, 351–362. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.006
36
SimoesS. M. N.Rey-RicoA.ConcheiroA.Alvarez-LorenzoC. (2015). Supramolecular cyclodextrin-based drug nanocarriers. Chem. Commun.51, 6275–6289. 10.1039/C4CC10388B
37
SuJ.-F.SchlangenE. (2012). Synthesis and physicochemical properties of high compact microcapsules containing rejuvenator applied in asphalt. Chem. Eng. J.198–199, 289–300. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.094
38
SuJ. F.SchlangenE.QiuJ. (2013). Design and construction of microcapsules containing rejuvenator for asphalt. Powder Technol. 235, 563–571. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.11.013
39
SukhorukovG. B.AntipovA. A.VoigtA.DonathE.MöhwaldH. (2001). pH-controlled macromolecule encapsulation in and release from polyelectrolyte multilayer nanocapsules. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 22, 44–46. 10.1002/1521-3927(20010101)22:1<44::AID-MARC44>3.0.CO;2-U
40
TongW. J.SongX. X.GaoC. Y. (2012). Layer-by-layer assembly of microcapsules and their biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.41, 6103–6124. 10.1039/c2cs35088b
41
VaronaS.Rodríguez RojoS.MartínÁ.CoceroM. J.SerraA. T.CrespoT.et al. (2013). Antimicrobial activity of lavandin essential oil formulations against three pathogenic food-borne bacteria. Ind. Crops Prod.42, 243–250. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.020
42
WaghS. J.DhumalS. S.SureshA. K. (2009). An experimental study of polyurea membrane formation by interfacial polycondensation. J. Memb. Sci.328, 246–256. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.018
43
WangW.LiuX.XieY.ZhangH. A.YuW.XiongY.et al. (2006). Microencapsulation using natural polysaccharides for drug delivery and cell implantation. J. Mater. Chem.16, 3252–3267. 10.1039/b603595g
44
WangY.LiuW.ChenX. D.SelomulyaC. (2016). Micro-encapsulation and stabilization of DHA containing fish oil in protein-based emulsion through mono-disperse droplet spray dryer. J. Food Eng. 175, 74–84. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.12.007
45
WhiteS. R.SottosN. R.GeubelleP. H.MooreJ. S.KesslerM. R.SriramS. R.et al. (2001). Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature409, 794–797. 10.1038/35057232
46
XuJ.ZhaoW.NingY.BashariM.WuF.ChenH.et al. (2013). Improved stability and controlled release of ω3/ω6 polyunsaturated fatty acids by spring dextrin encapsulation. Carbohydr. Polym.92, 1633–1640. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.037
47
ZhangD.-X.LiB.-X.ZhangX.-P.ZhangZ.-Q.WangW.-C.LiuF. (2016). Phoxim microcapsules prepared with polyurea and urea–formaldehyde resins differ in photostability and insecticidal activity. J. Agric. Food Chem.64, 2841–2846. 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00231
48
ZhangW.HeS.LiuY.GengQ.DingG.GuoM.et al. (2014). Preparation and characterization of novel functionalized prochloraz microcapsules using silica–alginate–elements as controlled release carrier materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces6, 11783–11790. 10.1021/am502541g
49
ZhangX. P.LuoJ.JingT.-,f, Zhang, D.-,x, Li, B.-, x, Liu, F. (2018b). Porous epoxy phenolic novolac resin polymer microcapsules: tunable release and bioactivity controlled by epoxy value. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces165, 165–171. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.026
50
ZhangX. P.LuoJ.ZhangD. X.JingT. F.LiB. X.LiuF. (2018a). Porous microcapsules with tunable pore sizes provide easily controllable release and bioactivity. J. Colloid Interface Sci.517, 86–92. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.100
51
ZhangY.ZhongQ. (2013). Encapsulation of bixin in sodium caseinate to deliver the colorant in transparent dispersions. Food Hydrocoll.33, 1–9. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.02.009
52
ZhaoG.LiuX.ZhuK.HeX. (2017). Hydrogel encapsulation facilitates rapid-cooling cryopreservation of stem cell-laden core–shell microcapsules as cell–biomaterial constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater.6:1700988. 10.1002/adhm.201700988
53
ZhiZ.-L.HaynieD. T. (2006). High-capacity functional protein encapsulation in nanoengineered polypeptide microcapsules. Chem. Commun.147–149. 10.1039/B511353A
54
ZuevV. V.LeeJ.KostrominS. V.BronnikovS. V.BhattacharyyaD. (2013). Statistical analysis of the self-healing epoxy-loaded microcapsules across their synthesis. Mater. Lett.94, 79–82. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.026
55
ZuoM.LiuT.HanJ.TangY.YaoF.YuanY.et al. (2014). Preparation and characterization of microcapsules containing ammonium persulfate as core by in situ polymerization. Chem. Eng. J.249, 27–33. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.041
Summary
Keywords
microcapsule, polyphenol, metal ion, deposition, coordination assembly, membrane thickness
Citation
Li B, Li X, Liu Y, Zhang D, Lin J, Mu W and Liu F (2018) Easily Tunable Membrane Thickness of Microcapsules by Using a Coordination Assembly on the Liquid-Liquid Interface. Front. Chem. 6:387. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00387
Received
26 April 2018
Accepted
09 August 2018
Published
07 September 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
Clemens Kilian Weiss, Fachhochschule Bingen, Germany
Reviewed by
Walter Caseri, ETH Zürich, Switzerland; Antonis Kanellopoulos, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Li, Li, Liu, Zhang, Lin, Mu and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Feng Liu fliu@sdau.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Polymer Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.