Abstract
Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts derived from biomass have become one of the research focuses in hetero-catalysis due to their low cost, high performance, and reproducibility properties. Related researches are of great significance for the development of next-generation fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Herein, the preparation methods of various biomass-derived catalysts and their performance in alkaline, neutral, and acidic media are summarized. This review clarifies the research progress of biomass carbon-based electrocatalysts for ORR in acidic, alkaline and neutral media, and discusses the future development trends. This minireview can give us an important enlightenment to practical application in the future.
Introduction
The development of green energy has been urgent due to the increasingly international attention toward energy shortages and environmental pollutions. Among these energy storage devices, fuel cells have been considered as a promising alternative with clean, stable, and sustainable properties in order to meet the growing global energy demands (Dai et al., 2015). Therefore, rational design of low-cost oxygen reduction electrocatalysts is critical for the storage and electrochemical performance of renewable energy sources (Liu et al., 2015). As an ideal component of primary energy equipment, fuel cells using hydrogen or hydrocarbon fuels can directly convert chemical fuel into electricity through electrochemical processes and operate at ambient temperature (Winter and Brodd, 2004). Even though the amount of Pt is capable of achieving the desired catalytic effect by using Pt alloys (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2009) or making core-shell nanostructures with supporting materials (Li et al., 2018), the high cost, insufficient durability, and unrefined technology still restrict the practical large-scale commercialization (Guo et al., 2013; Kaur et al., 2019).
Accordingly, to address these above issues, numerous non-Pt materials have been studied as cathode catalysts alternative to Pt-based catalysts for ORR (Banham et al., 2015; Shao et al., 2016). Cuurently, biomass-derived materials, such as active carbon (Deng et al., 2010), enzyme (Qiao et al., 2010), microorganism (Majidi et al., 2019; Papiya et al., 2019), transition metal porphyrins (Zheng et al., 2016), NiIn2S4/CNFs (Fu et al., 2019), and phthalocyanines (Kaare et al., 2016; Bhowmick et al., 2019) have potential capability to replace Pt. Therefore, the method of producing ORR catalyst from biomass has attracted extensive attention of researchers in many aspects (Liu et al., 2016; Sawant et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017). In this minireview, the catalytic mechanism for oxygen reduction reaction in different media is given, including a four-electron pathway and a two-electron pathway. Thereafter, various biomass-derived carbons and composites for ORR in alkline, neutral, and acidic media are summarized (Figure 1). The aforementioned biomass-derived carbons and composites exhibit outstanding electrochemical performance, which make them promising candidates for alternating Pt-based electrocatalysts. Moreover, we discuss the furture research direction and challenges of biomass-derived carbon electrocatalyst for ORR in different media.
Figure 1
Catalytic Mechanism for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Generally, the oxygen reduction reaction in an aqueous electrolyte can proceed via two types: a four-electron pathway and a two-electron pathway. The former method could directly reduce oxygen to water, which is preferable than the two-electron route using hydrogen peroxide as a reaction intermediate. The choice of overall pathway depends on the type of catalyst. So far, many literatures have reported the use of biomass and its derivatives as ORR catalysts in neutral or alkaline medium, the reaction mechanism can be described as follows:
Four-electron pathway:
Two-electron pathway:
The accumulation of OH− at the catalytic sites can lead to a considerable decline in the kinetic performance (Popat et al., 2012).
In an acidic medium, the mechanism can be described as follows:
Four-electron pathway:
Two-electron pathway:
In Alkaline Medium
Catalysts with excellent ORR performance in an alkaline medium will play an important role in metal-air batteries. Currently, biomass-derived carbon electrocatalysts for ORR have been reported to be the most effective in alkaline medium. As illustrated in Figure S1A, natural cattail fibers are used to prepare porous nitrogen-doped carbon through direct chemical activation and heteroatom doping (Liu et al., 2019). The obtained graphene-like sheets from biomass pyrolysis are assembled into three-dimensional carbon frameworks, which exhibit a significant synergistic effect on the improvement of catalytic properties. Fu et al. successfully prepared NiIn2S4 nanosheets supported on carbon nanofibers (Figure S1B). It was found that the performance of prepared catalyst is better than that of single metal Ni or In sulfides (Fu et al., 2019). Corn stover was also reported as a biomass precursor for the preparation of nitrogen, cobalt co-doped electrocatalyst (NCAC-Co) for ORR and aluminum-air batteries (Liu et al., 2018). The resulting porous biocarbon electrocatalyst not only exhibits the 4-electron oxygen reduction mechanism, but also displays excellent durability and stability. The author clearly demonstrated that the NCAC-Co has good prospects and is expected to become an economical and large-scale catalyst substitute for metal-air batteries. As illustrated in Figure S1C, the NCAC-Co electrocatalyst was prepared by two major steps of KOH activation and heteroatom doping. In addition to the examples metioned above, other promising biomass precursors are dandelion seeds (Tang et al., 2019), shaddock peel (Lu et al., 2019), chitosan (Zhao et al., 2017), mulberry leaves (He et al., 2019), gelatin (Yang et al., 2019), and chitin (Wang et al., 2019) etc.
In Neutral Medium
As the research on microbial fuel cells becomes more and more in-depth, the development of new high-performance biomass carbon materials has become increasingly crucial. Compared with the alkaline medium, biomass catalysts have fewer applications in neutral media because the ORR performances were slightly negative. However, biomass-derived electrocatalysts have a higher stability in a neutral medium. For instance, the sewage sludge-derived biochar was successfully prepared and employed as an excellent ORR electrocatalyst. As shown in Figure S2A, the structural change of as-obtained carbonized materials was clearly observed, which was detected by Raman spectroscopy (Yuan et al., 2013). In addition, Lu et al. developed a low-cost method to prepare egg-based heteroatom-doped carbon catalysts. The ORR catalytic activity of prepared electrocatalyst in a neutral medium is comparable to that of a commercially available Pt/C catalyst (Figure S2B, Lu et al., 2017). In the neutral medium, not only the above-mentioned biomass precursors are successfully used, the corn cob-derived catalysts synthesized by a simple pyrolysis method (Li et al., 2018) and mesoporous Fe-NC electrocatalysts prepared by activation of bacteria growing on Fe minerals (Ma et al., 2017) also delivered superior electrochemical performance.
In Acidic Medium
Owing to its low cost and abundant sources, biomass carbon materials can be used as excellent cathode catalysts to replace noble-metal electrocatalysts. One typical material is nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbon flakes extracted from low-cost bagasse (Yuan et al., 2016). Moreover, the enoki mushroom derived carbon electrocatalyst also possesses outstanding ORR activity and durability. The significant difference in ORR activity of the two carbon materials is shown in Figure S3A. Extraction of N-doped carbon nanomaterial from Nenoki mushroom biomass in a certain temperature is shown in Figure S3B (Guo et al., 2015). In addition to the above examples in an acid medium, sludge-based multi-doped electrocatalysts (Yuan and Dai, 2016) and corn starch derived nitrogen-doped carbon electrocatalysts (Wang et al., 2012) are also utilized for ORR in acidic medium.
As we discussed above, the biomass-derived materials not only have outstanding contributions in terms of catalytic performance, but also promote environmental improvement. Therefore, we establish a link between the electrolytes, biomass precursors, optimal preparation temperature, specific surface area, and onset potential of various ORR electrocatalysts, which are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Electrolyte | Biomass precursor | Optimal preparation temperature | Specific surface area | Onset Potential of Catalyst/Pt/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 M KOH | Chitosan (Zhao et al., 2017) | 800°C | 543 m2 g−1 | −0.08/−0.055 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Corn Stovers (Liu et al., 2018) | 900°C | 1877.3 m2 g−1 | / |
| 0.1 M KOH | Dandelion Seed (Tang et al., 2019) | 900°C | 1324.1 m2 g−1 | 0.83/0.85 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Chrysanthemum Flowers (Xu et al., 2017) | 800°C | 810 m2 g−1 | 1.0/1.0 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Malachium Aquaticum (Huang et al., 2016) | 900°C | 851.41 m2 g−1 | −0.053/−0.043 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Microalgae (Wu et al., 2019) | 1,000°C | / | 1.0/1.0 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Lotus Root (Rajendiran et al., 2019) | 700°C | 884 m2 g−1 | 0.84/0.92 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Shaddock Peel (Lu et al., 2019) | 900°C | 548 m2 g−1 | / |
| 0.1 M KOH | Coconut Shells (Borghei et al., 2017) | 1,000°C | 1260 m2 g−1 | −0.02/0.05 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
| 0.1 M KOH | NiIn2S4/CNFs (Fu et al., 2019) | / | 196.3 m2 g−1 | 1.46/1.50 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Cattail Fibers (Liu et al., 2019) | 900°C | 1773 m2 g−1 | 0.92/0.45 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Mulberry Leaves (He et al., 2019) | 800°C | 1689 m2 g−1 | 0.86/0.88 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.5 M KOH | Waste Leather (Alonso-Lemus et al., 2016) | / | 2100 m2 g−1 | 0.905/1.050 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | NCAC-Co (Liu et al., 2018) | 800°C | 1877.3 m2 g−1 | 0.795/0.760 V (vs. RHE) |
| Phosphate Buffer | Corncob (Li et al., 2018) | 650°C | 655.89 m2 g−1 | −0.13/−0.05 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
| Phosphate Buffer | Sewage Sludge (Yuan et al., 2013) | 900°C | 44 m2 g−1 | 0.11/0.09 V (vs. RHE) |
| Phosphate Buffer | Egg (Lu et al., 2017) | 900°C | 703.47 m2 g−1 | 0.257/0.157 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
| Phosphate Buffer | Bacteria (Ma et al., 2017) | 800°C | 1926.7 m2 g−1 | 1.01/1.01 V (vs. RHE) |
| 0.1 M KOH | Bagasse (Yuan et al., 2016) | 1,000°C | 1284 m2 g−1 | 1285/0.06 V (vs. Hg/HgO) |
| 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.43/0.65 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) | |||
| 0.1 M KOH | Enoki Mushroom (Guo et al., 2015) | 900°C | 305.3 m2 g−1 | 0.94/0.98 V |
| 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.81/0.93 V (vs. RHE) | |||
| 0.1 M KOH | Sewage Sludge (Yuan and Dai, 2016) | 800°C | 265.05 m2 g−1 | 0.05/−0.08 V |
| 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.57/0.65 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) | |||
| 0.1 M KOH | Corn Starch (Wang et al., 2012) | 500°C | 1568.85 m2 g−1 | −0.03/0.02 V |
| 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.62/0.66 V (vs. RHE) | |||
| 0.1 M KOH | Starch (Yao et al., 2016) | 180°C | 976.6 m2 g−1 | 0.955/0.932 V |
| 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.840/0.930 V (vs. RHE) |
Typical examples of electrocatalysts derived from biomass.
Conclusions and Outlook
In recent years, there have been great progresses to develop biomass-derived carbon ORR electrocatalysts for meeting the requirements of high performance. Some materials, especially materials derived from biomass materials, have comparable or superior ORR properties and better stability than commercial Pt/C. Thus, biomass-derived carbons have attracted particular interest as a potential substitute for commercial Pt/C due to their good activity, low-cost, and reproducibility (Gasteiger and Markovic, 2009). In addition to the biomass electrocatalysts mentioned in this minireview, there will be numerous high-performance biomass-derived electrocatalysts for practical application in the future.
Although biomass-derived carbon materials have the widest sources and the lowest price, the controllability toward distribution of active sites is very general, which depends on the composition and structure of the biomass itself. How to achieve large-scale production is also an urgent problem preventing industrialization. Up to now, most biomass-derived carbon materials are only suitable for catalyzing oxygen reduction reactions under alkaline conditions, and their performance is unsatisfying in neutral and acidic media, which seriously affects the large-scale application of fuel cells.
Statements
Author contributions
MW, SW, and WK wrote the manuscript. HY and ZL modified the manuscript. SY and GL supervised the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51605188, 51605187, 51975245), Department of Education of Jilin Province (JJKH20180093KJ, JJKH20181163KJ), and Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department (Grant No. 20180201004GX).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.00116/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alonso-LemusI. L.Rodriguez-VarelaF. J.Figueroa-TorresM. Z.Sanchez-CastroM. E.Hernandez-RamirezA.Lardizabal-GutierrezD.et al. (2016). Novel self-nitrogen-doped porous carbon from waste leather as highly active metal-free electrocatalyst for the ORR. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy41, 23409–23416. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.033
2
BanhamD.YeS. Y.KnightsS.StewartS. M.WilsonM.GarzonF. (2015). UV-visible spectroscopy method for screening the chemical stability of potential antioxidants for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources281, 238–242. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.002
3
BhowmickG. D.Kibena-PoldseppE.MatisenL.MerisaluM.KookM.KaarikM.et al. (2019). Multi-walled carbon nanotube and carbide-derived carbon supported metal phthalocyanines as cathode catalysts for microbial fuel cell applications. Sustain. Energy Fuels3, 3525–3537. 10.1039/C9SE00574A
4
BorgheiM.LaocharoenN.Kibena-PõldseppE.JohanssonL. S.CampbellJ.KauppinenE.et al. (2017). Porous N, P-doped carbon from coconut shells with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction: alternative to Pt-C for alkaline fuel cells. Appl. Catal. B204, 394–402. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.029
5
DaiL.XueY.QuL.ChoiH. J.BaekJ. B. (2015). Metal-Free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev.115, 4823–4892. 10.1021/cr5003563
6
DengQ.LiX.ZuoJ.LingA.LoganB. E. (2010). Power generation using an activated carbon fiber felt cathode in an upflow microbial fuel cell. J. Power Sources195, 1130–1135. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.092
7
FuG.WangY.TangY.ZhouK.GoodenoughJ. B.LeeJ.-M. (2019). Superior oxygen electrocatalysis on nickel indium thiospinels for rechargeable Zn–air batteries. ACS Mater. Lett.1, 123–131. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00093
8
GasteigerH. A.MarkovicN. M. (2009). Just a dream-or future reality?Science324, 48–49. 10.1126/science.1172083
9
GuoC.LiaoW.LiZ.SunL.ChenC. (2015). Easy conversion of protein-rich enoki mushroom biomass to a nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterial as a promising metal-free catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale7, 15990–15998. 10.1039/C5NR03828F
10
GuoS. J.ZhangS.SuD.SunS. H. (2013). Seed-mediated synthesis of core/shell FePtM/FePt (M = Pd, Au) nanowires and their electrocatalysis for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 13879–13884. 10.1021/ja406091p
11
HeD.ZhaoW.LiP.SunS.TanQ.HanK.et al. (2019). Bifunctional biomass-derived N, S dual-doped ladder-like porous carbon for supercapacitor and oxygen reduction reaction. J. Alloys Compd.773, 11–20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.141
12
HuangH.WeiX.GaoS. (2016). Nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from malachium aquaticum biomass as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta220, 427–435. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.108
13
JiangS.MaY.JianG.TaoH.WangX.FanY.et al. (2009). Facile construction of Pt-Co/CNx nanotube electrocatalysts and their application to the oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Mater.21, 4953–4956. 10.1002/adma.200900677
14
KaareK.KruusenbergI.MerisaluM.MatisenL.SammelselgV.TammeveskiK. (2016). Electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on multi-walled carbon nanotube supported copper and manganese phthalocyanines in alkaline media. J. Solid State Electr.20, 921–929. 10.1007/s10008-015-2990-9
15
KaurP.VermaG.SekhonS. S. (2019). Biomass derived hierarchical porous carbon materials as oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts in fuel cells. Prog. Mater. Sci.102, 1–71. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.12.002
16
LiM.ZhangH.XiaoT.WangS.ZhangB.ChenD.et al. (2018). Low-cost biochar derived from corncob as oxygen reduction catalyst in air cathode microbial fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta283, 780–788. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.010
17
LiuL.YangX. F.MaN.LiuH. T.XiaY. Z.ChenC. M.et al. (2016). Scalable and cost-effective synthesis of highly efficient Fe2N-based oxygen reduction catalyst derived from seaweed biomass. Small12, 1295–1301. 10.1002/smll.201503305
18
LiuW.ChengS.SunD.HuangH.ChenJ.CenK. (2015). Inhibition of microbial growth on air cathodes of single chamber microbial fuel cells by incorporating enrofloxacin into the catalyst layer. Biosens. Bioelectron.72, 44–50. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.04.082
19
LiuY.HuM.XuW.WuX.JiangJ. (2019). Catalytically active carbon from cattail fibers for electrochemical reduction reaction. Front. Chem.7:786. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00786
20
LiuZ.LiZ.MaJ.DongX.KuW.WangM.et al. (2018). Nitrogen and cobalt-doped porous biocarbon materials derived from corn stover as efficient electrocatalysts for aluminum-air batteries. Energy162, 453–459. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.175
21
LuL.YuJ.WuZ.FanJ.LeiW.OuyangY.et al. (2019). Shaddock peel derived nitrogen and phosphorus dual-doped hierarchical porous carbons as high-performance catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Hydrogen Energy44, 26982–26991. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.133
22
LuY.ZhuN.YinF.YangT.WuP.DangZ.et al. (2017). Biomass-derived heteroatoms-doped mesoporous carbon for efficient oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron.98, 350–356. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.006
23
MaX.LeiZ.FengW.YeY.FengC. (2017). Living Fe mineral@bacteria encrustation-derived and self-templated preparation of a mesoporous Fe-N-C electrocatalyst with high activity for oxygen reduction. Carbon123, 481–491. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.091
24
MajidiM. R.FarahaniF. S.HosseiniM.AhadzadehI. (2019). Low-cost nanowired alpha-MnO2/C as an ORR catalyst in air-cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioelectrochemistry125, 38–45. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.09.004
25
PapiyaF.DasS.PattanayakP.KunduP. P. (2019). The fabrication of silane modified graphene oxide supported Ni-Co bimetallic electrocatalysts: a catalytic system for superior oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy44, 25874–25893. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.020
26
PopatS. C.KiD.RittmannB. E.TorresC. I. (2012). Importance of OH(-) transport from cathodes in microbial fuel cells. ChemSusChem5, 1071–1079. 10.1002/cssc.201100777
27
QiaoY.BaoS. J.LiC. M. (2010). Electrocatalysis in microbial fuel cells-from electrode material to direct electrochemistry. Energy Environ. Sci.3, 544–553. 10.1039/b923503e
28
RajendiranR.NallalM.ParkK. H.LiO. L.KimH.-J.PrabakarK. (2019). Mechanochemical assisted synthesis of heteroatoms inherited highly porous carbon from biomass for electrochemical capacitor and oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis. Electrochim. Acta317, 1–9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.139
29
SawantS. Y.HanT. H.ChoM. H. (2016). Metal-free carbon-based materials: promising electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18, 712–749. 10.3390/ijms18010025
30
ShaoM. H.ChangQ. W.DodeletJ. P.ChenitzR. (2016). Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev.116, 3594–3657. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462
31
StamenkovicV. R.MunB. S.ArenzM.MayrhoferK. J. J.LucasC. A.WangG.et al. (2007). Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nat. Mater.6, 241–247. 10.1038/nmat1840
32
TangJ.WangY.ZhaoW.ZengR. J.LiuT.ZhouS. (2019). Biomass-derived hierarchical honeycomb-like porous carbon tube catalyst for the metal-free oxygen reduction reaction. J. Electroanal. Chem.847:113230. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113230
33
WangD.XinH. L.WangH.YuY.RusE.MullerD. A.et al. (2012). Facile synthesis of carbon-supported pd-co core-shell nanoparticles as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts and their enhanced activity and stability with monolayer Pt decoration. Chem. Mater.24, 2274–2281. 10.1021/cm203863d
34
WangM.MaJ.YangH.LuG.YangS.ChangZ. (2019). Nitrogen and cobalt co-coped carbon materials derived from biomass chitin as high-performance electrocatalyst for aluminum-air batteries. Catalysts9:954. 10.3390/catal9110954
35
WinterM.BroddR. J. (2004). What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors?Chem. Rev.104, 4245–4269. 10.1021/cr020730k
36
WuX.ChenK.LinZ.ZhangY.MengH. (2019). Nitrogen doped graphitic carbon from biomass as non noble metal catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Mater. Today Energy13, 100–108. 10.1016/j.mtener.2019.05.004
37
XuL.FanH.HuangL.XiaJ.LiS.LiM.et al. (2017). Chrysanthemum-derived N and S co-doped porous carbon for efficient oxygen reduction reaction and aluminum-air battery. Electrochim. Acta239, 1–9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.002
38
YangH.KouS.LiZ.ChangZ.WangM.LiuZ.et al. (2019). 3D interconnected nitrogen-self-doped carbon aerogels as efficient oxygen reduction electrocatalysts derived from biomass gelatin. RSC Adv.9, 40301–40308. 10.1039/C9RA07926B
39
YaoW.-T.YuL.YaoP.-F.WeiK.HanS.-L.ChenP.et al. (2016). Bulk production of nonprecious metal catalysts from cheap starch as precursor and their excellent electrochemical activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.4, 3235–3244. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00269
40
YuanS.-J.DaiX.-H. (2016). Efficient sewage sludge-derived bi-functional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reaction. Green Chem.18, 4004–4011. 10.1039/C5GC02729B
41
YuanW.XieA.LiS.HuangF.ZhangP.ShenY. (2016). High-activity oxygen reduction catalyst based on low-cost bagasse, nitrogen and large specific surface area. Energy115, 397–403. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.026
42
YuanY.YuanT.WangD. M.TangJ. H.ZhouS. G. (2013). Sewage sludge biochar as an efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in an microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol.144, 115–120. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.075
43
ZhaoJ.LiuY.QuanX.ChenS.YuH.ZhaoH. (2017). Nitrogen-doped carbon with a high degree of graphitization derived from biomass as high-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci.396, 986–993. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.073
44
ZhengY.YangD.-S.KweunJ. M.LiC.TanK.KongF.et al. (2016). Rational design of common transition metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. Nano Energy30, 443–449. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.037
Summary
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, biomass-derived, electrocatalyst, fuel cells, hetero-catalysis
Citation
Wang M, Wang S, Yang H, Ku W, Yang S, Liu Z and Lu G (2020) Carbon-Based Electrocatalysts Derived From Biomass for Oxygen Reduction Reaction: A Minireview. Front. Chem. 8:116. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00116
Received
08 December 2019
Accepted
07 February 2020
Published
28 February 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Gengtao Fu, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Reviewed by
Ao Wang, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China; Juan Bai, Shaanxi Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Wang, Wang, Yang, Ku, Yang, Liu and Lu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shuchen Yang ysc2017@mail.cncnc.edu.cnGuolong Lu guolonglu@jlu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Catalysis and Photocatalysis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.