Membrane-free Electrocatalysis of CO2 to C2 on CuO/CeO2 Nanocomposites

Highlight

• Nano CeO2 cube was applied as supports for highly dispersed CuO nanoparticles.

• The CuO(002) crystal faces were preferentially grown on CeO2(200).

• The Faradaic efficiency of CO₂ to C₂ exceeds 62% in a membrane-free cell.

Introduction

Carbon dioxide electroreduction reaction (CO₂RR) has attracted worldwide attention because of its promising application in suppressing carbon dioxide emission (Gong et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2020; Li H et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022). However, it still needs high performance catalysts to accelerate the conversion of carbon dioxide and control the selectivity of products for the industrial application.

On different catalysts, various products may be obtained, such as carbon monoxide, formic acid, methanol, methane, ethylene, ethanol, oxalic acid, and acetic acid. Among them, the C₂+ products were desired because of their much higher added value and more important theoretical significance of understanding C-C bond formation (Ma et al., 2020; Li Z et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). Among all the elements, copper is considered as the only candidate as a high selective catalyst for C₂+ products. In order to achieve better catalytic performance of copper-based catalysts, tremendous works have been carried out from the aspect of crystal faces (Suen et al., 2019), size (Wang et al., 2019), morphology (De Luna et al., 2018), defects (Gu et al., 2021), valence state (Mistry et al., 2016), and surface modification (Li F et al., 2020). Unfortunately, nearly all the pioneer works are executed in a two-chamber cell system, which need a cation or anion exchange membrane to separate the anode and cathode chambers. From a practical and industrial point of view, membranes make the CO₂RR reactor more complex, increase cost, and limits large-scale application. Therefore, the design of a membrane-free electroreduction process is of great significance. Though with more concise and compact structure, the membrane-free cell still faces several critical challenges, such as the separation of products and the coupling with anodic reaction. For instance, the water oxidation reaction is inevitably on the anode when using aqueous electrolyte. In this condition, the oxygen produced and dissolved in the electrolyte may oxidize the active sites and lead to the decomposition of products in the liquid phase. In order to improve the oxygen tolerance of catalysts for CO₂RR, several interesting works have been reported (Lu et al., 2019; He et al., 2020). For example, Sun et al. (Li P et al., 2020) developed a CO₂-selective layer by introducing aniline into the pores of a microporosity polymer to permeate CO₂ from O₂ mixture. It was found that the acid–base interaction between CO₂ and aniline enhances CO₂ separation from O₂. Even if the polymer coating is a feasible strategy to protect the active sites from interacting with oxygen, it is not conducive to the effective exposure of active sites. Therefore, new strategies need to be developed to achieve oxygen tolerance and full exposure of active sites simultaneously.

In addition to oxidation, the reduction of active sites in the CO₂RR process also needs to be considered, whether there is a membrane or not. Especially for the oxide-derived copper (OD-Cu) catalysts, the Cu⁺ has been proposed as the most important active site in the formation of C-C bond, while its stability has always been a great challenge due to its easy reduction under negative applied potentials in the CO₂RR procedure (Yuan et al., 2018). The strong metal–support interactions have been proved a promising way to improve catalytic activity of metal active sites, which is also applied to upgrade the catalytic performance of copper-based catalysts for the CO₂RR (Geioushy et al., 2017). For example, Lee et al. (2019) sintered the CuO nanocrystals onto CeO₂ and found that the ceria is proposed to weaken the hydrogen binding energy of adjacent Cu sites to stabilize the *OCCO intermediate via an additional chemical interaction with an oxygen atom in the *OCCO. Zheng et al. (Wang et al., 2018) designed single-atomic Cu–substituted mesoporous CeO₂ nanorods with multiple oxygen vacancy bond. They found each Cu atom substituted in the CeO₂(110) surface can be stabilized by coordinating with three oxygen vacancies, yielding a highly effective catalytic center for CO₂ adsorption and activation to methane. On the contrary, Qiao et al. (Wu et al., 2018) proved the isolated cuprous ions doped in ceria nanorods exhibit strong capability to capture CO₂ and CO molecules and decrease the energy barrier for producing C₂ products, leading to a high Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 47.6% toward ethylene. On the other hand, the stabilization effects of ceria substrate toward cuprous ions are responsible for the long-term durability. Sun et al. (Chu et al., 2020a) found that the selectivity and activity of the CO₂RR on Cu/CeO₂ composites are depended strongly on the exposed crystal facets of CeO₂. By tuning the CuO/CeO₂ interfacial interaction, they further improved the selectivity of ethylene by stabilizing Cu⁺ at the CuO–CeO₂ interface (Chu et al., 2020b). Han et al. (Yan et al., 2021) modified copper oxide with cerium oxide to enhanced water activation and accelerate the formation rate of *CHO, thus enhance the selectivity and activity of C₂₊ products by promoting the hydrogenation of *CHO. Though the existing works have proved that CeO₂ is a promising candidate as the supports of copper in the traditional H-cell (with a membrane to separate two champers) for the CO₂RR process, few works have been reported achieving a high selectivity toward C₂ products in a membrane-free cell.

Herein, we synthesized a series of novel CuO/CeO₂ composites by dispersing CuO nanoparticles (NPs) on CeO₂ nonocubes (NCs), which is then used as catalysts for the CO₂RR in a single chamber cell without membrane. Surprisingly, the Faradaic efficiency of C₂ was found exceeding 62% for the first time. This new finding may set off a new research climax in a simple membrane-free cell for industrial perspective of CO₂ electrocatalysis.

Results and Discussion

The fabrication of CuO/CeO₂ is illustrated in Figure 1. The CeO₂ NCs were synthesis by a modified hydrothermal method (Zhu et al., 2020). Through an impregnation–precipitation process, copper (II) ions were introduced into ceria lattice. After annealing at 773 K for 3 h, the CuO/CeO₂ samples were obtained. The detailed composition of CuO/CeO₂ composites is listed in Supplementary Table S1.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Illustration of the synthesis of CeO₂ and CuO/CeO₂.

The crystal structure of samples as made was firstly investigated by XRD. As depicted in Figure 2A, the characteristic peaks of 28.6°, 33.1°, 47.5°, and 56.4° were ascribed to the (111), (200), (220) and (311) planes of CeO₂, which is accurately corresponds to the standard spectrum of CeO₂ (JCPDS No.03-065-0459, space group: Fd-3m Ia3̅, a = 10.774 Å). As a control experiment, we also synthesized CuO following the same procedure but in the absence of CeO₂. The peaks at 38.8° was corresponded to the (111) planes of CuO (JCPDS No.80-1916). Interestingly, no characteristic peaks of CuO or Cu₂O were found in the CuO/CeO₂ composites, which need further characterization.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. (A) XRD spectra of CuO, CuO/CeO₂ and CeO₂; (B) XPS survey spectra of CuO/CeO₂; (C) XPS of Ce 3d spectra of CuO/CeO₂ and CeO2; (D) XPS of Cu 2p spectra of CuO and CuO/CeO₂.

The detailed element composition of CuO/CeO₂ was analyzed by XPS spectrum. In Figure 2B, the characteristic peaks of Cu, Ce, and O elements were observed clearly, indicating that the CuO/CeO₂ composites were successful prepared. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ce elopement is shown in Figure 2C. The Ce 3d curve was fitted to 10 peaks corresponding to Ce 3d_5/2 (μ₁, 880.5 eV; ν_o, 882.2 eV; μ₀, 884.1 eV; ν₁,888.7 eV; and ν₂, 897.8 eV) and Ce 3d_3/2 state (μ₁′, 898.4 eV; ν₀′, 900.7 eV; μ₀′, 902.5 eV; ν₁′, 907.5 eV; and ν₂′, 916.6 eV). The peaks of μ₀, μ₁, μ₀′, and μ₁′ are attributed to Ce³⁺ species, and the remaining peaks are attributed to the Ce⁴⁺ species (Wang et al., 2018). According to the peak area ratio of the Ce 3d region of CuO/CeO₂, the relative Ce³⁺ percentage in CeO₂ is 17.6%, which is much less than that in the pure CeO₂ (20.8% of Ce³⁺). This phenomenon is derived from the substitution of Ce ions by Cu ions during the synthesis procedure (Wu et al., 2018). The Cu 2p spectra of CuO/CeO₂ and CuO show distinct copper oxide features in Figure 2D. In addition to the satellite peaks of Cu²⁺, the binding energies (BEs) of 934.2 eV in the Cu 2p_3/2 region can be attributed to the Cu²⁺ and the peak at 932.7 eV is attributed to the Cu⁺ (Lei et al., 2020) According to the peak area ratio of copper oxidation states in the Cu 2p_3/2 region, the relative Cu⁺ percentage of CuO dispersed on CeO₂ is determined to be 38.4%, while the relative Cu⁺ percentage of pure copper oxide is 28.3%. The increased content of Cu⁺ was derived from the transfer of electrons from Ce³⁺ to Cu²⁺ (Chu et al., 2020b).

The morphology of CuO/CeO₂ was verified by the SEM and TEM images. As shown in Figure 3A, the CeO₂ NPs obtained in this work have an obviously cubic morphology with smooth surface, which size is ca. 23 nm. The morphology of CeO₂ was confirmed by TEM (Figure 3B) to be classical cubes with clear boundaries. In the HRTEM image, the CeO₂(200) crystal planes were mainly exposed (Figure 3C), which is confirmed by the SAED pattern (Figure 3D). After compositing with CuO, the cubic morphology and size of CeO₂ was maintained but the smooth surface was mostly covered by the irregular CuO NPs with the diameter from 20 to 30 nm (Figures 3E,F).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. (A) SEM images of CeO₂; (B) TEM images of CeO₂; (C) HRTEM images of CeO₂; (D) SAED pattern of CeO₂; (E) SEM images of CuO/CeO₂; (F) TEM images of CuO/CeO₂; (G) HRTEM images of CuO/CeO₂; (H) SAED pattern of CuO/CeO₂; (I–L) EDS mapping of CuO/CeO₂.

It is worth noting that there is a clear boundary between CuO(002) and CeO₂(200), as shown in Figure 3G. Furthermore, the SAED pattern of CuO/CeO₂ (Figure 3H) confirmed that the CeO₂(200) and CuO(002) planes exist simultaneously and the EDS mapping (Figures 3I–L) indicates the CuO NPs were uniformly dispersed on CeO₂.

To verify the catalytic performance of the catalysts as made, the LSV curves of all the samples in 0.1 M KHCO₃ with Ar- and CO₂-saturated were recorded, as shown in Figure 4A. For the CuO/CeO₂, larger current density was obtained in CO₂-saturated 0.1 M KHCO₃ than in the Ar-saturated conditions, indicating the CuO/CeO₂ composites have obviously catalytic activity toward CO₂RR (Chu et al., 2020b). As a control example, the LSV curves of CeO₂ almost coincide in the Ar- and CO₂-saturated conditions, indicating the ceria has no activity toward CO₂RR.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. (A) LSV curves of CeO₂ and CuO/CeO₂ under Ar- and CO₂-saturated 0.1 M KHCO₃ in a single cell; (B) Faradaic efficiency and C₂ products current density of CuO/CeO₂; (C) Faradaic efficiency and C₂ products current density of CuO; (D) Faradaic efficiency of CeO₂; (E) Comparison of Faraday efficiency of CuO/CeO₂ and CuO at different voltages; (F) stability curve and Faradaic efficiency of C₂ during 9 h.

Furthermore, the comprehensive catalytic performance of CO₂RR on CuO/CeO₂ under different applied potentials was investigated in a home-made single chamber electrolytic cell without membrane (Supplementary Figure S1). The Faradaic efficiencies of all the products were recorded in Figures 4B–D. Only a small amount of CO and methane were detected in the gas products, which means the CeO₂ as catalyst has low activity toward CO₂ electroreduction. While for the CuO/CeO₂ samples, various products were detected by chromatography, including CO, CH₄, C₂H₄, C₂H₅OH, and HCOOH. Take C₂ (C₂H₄ + C₂H₅OH) as the target product, as shown in Figures 4C,F, the maximum Faraday efficiency of C₂ always appears at −1.4 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and the FE of C₂ arrived at the highest value of 62.2%. As control experiments, the maximum FE of C₂ on pristine CuO under −1.4 V vs. RHE is only 40%, indicating the CeO₂ as supports can increase the selectivity of CuO toward CO₂ electroreduction to C₂. For comparison, the FEs of products on the mixture of CuO and CeO₂ (with the same ratio of Cu/Ce as CuO/CeO₂) were also recorded and depicted in Supplementary Figure S3. The FE of C₂ is 51.1% at −1.4 V vs. RHE, which is lower than that of CuO/CeO₂ but higher than that of CuO, proving that the presence of CeO₂ is conducive to the selectivity of C₂ while the composited state of CuO and CeO₂ has better performance in producing C₂ products than the mixed state. Next, the partial current density was applied to evaluate the formation rate of target products. Specially at −1.4 V vs. RHE, the partial current density of C₂ is 4.5 mA cm⁻² on CuO/CeO₂, which is higher than that on CuO (3.9 mA cm⁻²). While in the H-type cell, with the optimum CuO/CeO₂ catalyst, the FE of C₂ is 58.4% with a partial current density of 4.3 mA cm⁻², as shown in Supplementary Figure S4. The higher selectivity and activity further prove the superiority of our catalyst in a single cell than the H-type cell.

We also tested the long-time durability of different catalysts in the membrane-free condition (Figure 4F and Supplementary Figure S5). After 9 h’ electrocatalysis at −1.4 V vs. RHE, the catalytic performance of CuO/CeO₂ is stable with no significant change and the Faradaic efficiency for C₂ remains around 60%. On the contrary, when the pristine CuO was used as catalyst, the current density had a noticeable increasing over time and the FE of C₂ decreased from 40 to 21%, which mean the Cu⁺ in CuO cannot be stabilized and the selectivity of C₂ was synchronously reduced.

In order to unveil the reason of different performance between CuO/CeO₂ and pristine CuO, the composition and morphology of catalyst after electrocatalysis were characterized. As proved by SEM and TEM image in Figures 5A,B, the morphology of CuO/CeO₂ was well maintained after reaction. In addition, the XPS results further revealed that the ratio of Cu⁺/(Cu⁺ + Cu²⁺) has no significant change compared to the fresh catalyst, indicates Cu⁺ can be well stabilized by CeO₂ during the CO₂RR process. The stability of the morphology and valence state of the CuO/CeO₂ composite further proves that the stabilization effects of ceria toward Cu⁺, which provides favorable catalysts for the high-efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide in a membrane-free electrolyzer.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. (A) SEM images of CuO/CeO₂; (B) TEM images of CuO/CeO₂; (C) XPS of Ce 3d spectra of CuO/CeO₂; (D) Cu 2p spectra of CuO/CeO₂ after CO₂RR.

Conclusion

In this work, the CeO₂ NCs with average size of 230 nm were facilely synthesized by a hydrothermal method. Further through an impregnation–calcination process, the CuO NPs with diameters from 20 to 30 nm was highly dispersed on the surface of CeO₂ to fabricate novel composites of CuO/CeO₂, in which the mainly exposed crystal faces was CuO(002) and CeO₂(200). Due to the strong metal–metal oxide interaction between copper and ceria, the content of Cu⁺ was increased in the CuO/CeO₂ composite and stabilized in the CO₂RR process, which makes the CuO/CeO₂ an excellent catalyst for CO₂RR toward C₂ products with high selectivity and stability in a single cell without membrane. This study opens up a new way to realize the high-efficiency electroreduction of CO₂ by using a simple membrane-free system.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

YT: experiments and writing. XF and DFT: calculation. HN: experimental guidance. WW: experimental assistant. XT: experimental assistant. XW: experimental assistant. ZM: experimental assistant. ZG: experimental assistant. MW: article review.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52072409), Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2020CXGC010403), and Taishan Scholar Project (No. ts201712020).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.915759/full#supplementary-material

References

Chu, S., Li, X., W. Robertson, A., and Sun, Z. (2020a). Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to Ethylene over CeO₂-Supported Cu Nanoparticles: Effect of Exposed Facets of CeO₂. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 37, 2009023–2009020. doi:10.3866/pku.whxb202009023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, S., Yan, X., Choi, C., Hong, S., Robertson, A. W., Masa, J., et al. (2020b). Stabilization of Cu⁺ by Tuning a CuO-CeO₂ Interface for Selective Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Ethylene. Green Chem. 22, 6540–6546. doi:10.1039/d0gc02279a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Luna, P., Quintero-Bermudez, R., Dinh, C.-T., Ross, M. B., Bushuyev, O. S., Todorović, P., et al. (2018). Catalyst Electro-Redeposition Controls Morphology and Oxidation State for Selective Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Nat. Catal. 1, 103–110. doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0018-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, Q., Hou, P., Choi, C., Wu, T. S., Hong, S., Li, F., et al. (2020). Activation of Ni Particles into Single Ni-N Atoms for Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂. Adv. Energy Mat. 10, 1903068. doi:10.1002/aenm.201903068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geioushy, R. A., Khaled, M. M., Alhooshani, K., Hakeem, A. S., and Rinaldi, A. (2017). Graphene/ZnO/Cu₂O Electrocatalyst for Selective Conversion of CO₂ into N-Propanol. Electrochimica Acta 245, 456–462. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.185

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gong, Q., Ding, P., Xu, M., Zhu, X., Wang, M., Deng, J., et al. (2019). Structural Defects on Converted Bismuth Oxide Nanotubes Enable Highly Active Electrocatalysis of Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Nat. Commun. 10, 2807. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10819-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, Z., Shen, H., Chen, Z., Yang, Y., Yang, C., Ji, Y., et al. (2021). Efficient Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to C₂₊ Alcohols at Defect-Site-Rich Cu Surface. Joule 5, 429–440. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.12.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M., Li, C., Zhang, H., Chang, X., Chen, J. G., Goddard, W. A., et al. (2020). Oxygen Induced Promotion of Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ via Co-electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 3844. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17690-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, C. W., Shin, S.-J., Jung, H., Nguyen, D. L. T., Lee, S. Y., Lee, W. H., et al. (2019). Metal-Oxide Interfaces for Selective Electrochemical C-C Coupling Reactions. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2241–2248. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01721

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lei, Q., Zhu, H., Song, K., Wei, N., Liu, L., Zhang, D., et al. (2020). Investigating the Origin of Enhanced C₂₊ Selectivity in Oxide-/Hydroxide-Derived Copper Electrodes during CO₂ Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4213–4222. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b11790

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, F., Thevenon, A., Rosas-Hernández, A., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Gabardo, C. M., Ozden, A., Dinh, C. T., Li, J., Wang, Y., Edwards, J. P., Xu, Y., McCallum, C., Tao, L., Liang, Z.-Q., Luo, M., Wang, X., Li, H., O’Brien, C. P., Tan, C.-S., Nam, D.-H., Quintero-Bermudez, R., Zhuang, T.-T., Li, Y. C., Han, Z., Britt, R. D., Sinton, D., Agapie, T., Peters, J. C., and Sargent, E. H. (2020). Molecular Tuning of CO₂-to-ethylene Conversion. Nature 577, 509–513. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1782-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Liu, T., Wei, P., Lin, L., Gao, D., Wang, G., et al. (2021). High‐Rate CO₂ Electroreduction to C₂₊ Products over a Copper‐Copper Iodide Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 14329–14333. doi:10.1002/anie.202102657

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, P., Lu, X., Wu, Z., Wu, Y., Malpass‐Evans, R., McKeown, N. B., et al. (2020). Acid-Base Interaction Enhancing Oxygen Tolerance in Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 10918–10923. doi:10.1002/anie.202003093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhang, K., Yu, Y., Zhan, X., Gui, J., Xue, J., et al. (2022). Pd Homojunctions Enable Remarkable CO₂ Electroreduction. Chem. Commun. 58, 387–390. doi:10.1039/d1cc04780a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Yang, Y., Yin, Z., Wei, X., Peng, H., Lyu, K., et al. (2021). Interface-Enhanced Catalytic Selectivity on the C₂ Products of CO₂ Electroreduction. ACS Catal. 11, 2473–2482. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03846

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X., Jiang, Z., Yuan, X., Wu, Y., Malpass-Evans, R., Zhong, Y., et al. (2019). A Bio-Inspired O₂-Tolerant Catalytic CO₂ Reduction Electrode. Sci. Bull. 64, 1890–1895. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, W., Xie, S., Liu, T., Fan, Q., Ye, J., Sun, F., et al. (2020). Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ to Ethylene and Ethanol through Hydrogen-Assisted C-C Coupling over Fluorine-Modified Copper. Nat. Catal. 3, 478–487. doi:10.1038/s41929-020-0450-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mistry, H., Varela, A. S., Bonifacio, C. S., Zegkinoglou, I., Sinev, I., Choi, Y.-W., et al. (2016). Highly Selective Plasma-Activated Copper Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction to Ethylene. Nat. Commun. 7, 12123. doi:10.1038/ncomms12123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suen, N.-T., Kong, Z.-R., Hsu, C.-S., Chen, H.-C., Tung, C.-W., Lu, Y.-R., et al. (2019). Morphology Manipulation of Copper Nanocrystals and Product Selectivity in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. ACS Catal. 9, 5217–5222. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b00790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Q., Ren, W., Zhao, Y., and Zhao, C. (2021). Gram-scale Synthesis of Single-Atom Metal-N-CNT Catalysts for Highly Efficient CO₂ Electroreduction. Chem. Commun. 57, 1514–1517. doi:10.1039/d0cc07263j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Ning, H., Yang, Z., Feng, Z., Wang, J., Wang, X., et al. (2019). Interface-induced Controllable Synthesis of Cu₂O Nanocubes for Electroreduction CO₂ to C₂H₄. Electrochimica Acta 306, 360–365. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Han, P., Du, Y., Gu, Z., Xu, X., et al. (2018). Single-Atomic Cu with Multiple Oxygen Vacancies on Ceria for Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to CH₄. ACS Catal. 8, 7113–7119. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b01014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, D., Dong, C., Wu, D., Fu, J., Liu, H., Hu, S., et al. (2018). Cuprous Ions Embedded in Ceria Lattice for Selective and Stable Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene. J. Mat. Chem. A 6, 9373–9377. doi:10.1039/c8ta01677a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, X., Chen, C., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Chen, Y., Feng, R., et al. (2021). Efficient Electroreduction of CO₂ to C₂₊ Products on CeO₂ Modified CuO. Chem. Sci. 12, 6638–6645. doi:10.1039/d1sc01117k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, J., Zhang, J.-J., Yang, M.-P., Meng, W.-J., Wang, H., and Lu, J.-X. (2018). CuO Nanoparticles Supported on TiO₂ with High Efficiency for CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction to Ethanol. Catalysts 8, 171. doi:10.3390/catal8040171

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Li, Z., Xia, S., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Reconstructing Two-Dimensional Defects in CuO Nanowires for Efficient CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethylene. Chem. Commun. 57, 8276–8279. doi:10.1039/d1cc03171f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Z.-H., Zheng, K., Huang, N.-Y., Zhu, H.-L., Huang, J.-R., Liao, P.-Q., et al. (2021). A Cu(111)@metal-Organic Framework as a Tandem Catalyst for Highly Selective CO₂ Electroreduction to C₂H₄. Chem. Commun. 57, 12764–12767. doi:10.1039/d1cc05376k

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, C., Wei, X., Li, W., Pu, Y., Sun, J., Tang, K., et al. (2020). Crystal-plane Effects of CeO₂{110} and CeO₂{100} on Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction: Synergistic Interactions of Oxygen Defects and Hydroxyl Groups. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 14397–14406. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar