ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 09 November 2020

Sec. Food Chemistry

Volume 7 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.569172

Widely Targeted UHPLC-MS/MS Metabolomic Analysis on the Chemical Variation in Blueberry-Filled Pastries During Processing

  • 1. Department of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

  • 2. College of Life Science, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, China

  • 3. Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, China

  • 4. School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

The majority of components in fruits are sensitive to heat-processing. Nevertheless, fruits are becoming popular ingredients in processed foods, like bakery foods. Therefore, the fate of the components in the fruit-involved food during thermal processing is important for the assessment of their nutritional values and sensory properties. Unfortunately, comprehensive knowledge of the compositional alteration in real food products during processing is limited. In the current study, a popular bakery food, blueberry-filled pastry, was taken as the object, and a widely targeted metabolomic approach was applied to investigate the holistic compositional variation of blueberry filling during pastry preparation. Amongst the total of 630 chemicals identified, 288 chemicals were screened as differential compounds between samples collected at different processing stages. The most variation of the chemicals was observed during the process of stir-frying. A total of 197 chemicals varied significantly in concentrations during stir-frying, while only 75 chemicals altered significantly in contents during baking. Amongst 288 differential compounds, 117 belonged to the group of phenolic compounds, with the others found to be sugars and organic acids, amino acids, lipids, nucleotides, etc. The possible mechanisms of the chemical alterations during thermal processing were also discussed in the current study. The data provide comprehensive information on the compositional changes in berry-containing fillings during thermal processing, and hints and emphasis for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms.

Introduction

Blueberries contain various phytochemicals with potential health effects, including anthocyanins, flavonols, vitamins, lutein, sugars, and organic acid (1–3). The consumption of polyphenol-rich blueberries and their polyphenol extracts is associated with the protection and management of non-communicable diseases such as cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, and neurodegenerative diseases (1). However, the perishable nature and seasonal availability of berries limit the all-year-round supply and consumption. Food processing allows the all-year-round provision and provides various types of blueberry products to compensate for the different requirements and appreciations by the customers. One large group of products are bakery food products filled with blueberries or blueberry containing materials, such as pies, pastries, muffins, cakes, and cookies. Such food products are becoming increasingly popular and are consumed daily in many areas of the world. Processing can prolong the shelf life of blueberry products and increase the diversity of products for customers' choice; however, nutritional compounds, such as polyphenols, may be destroyed to some extent during processing, especially during thermal processing, which in turn affects the health-promoting properties of the products (4–6).

However, knowledge of the effect of thermal processing on the phytochemical profile of the products is limited to a few compounds due to the conventional analytical methods focusing only on a certain group of chemicals (3, 7, 8), although the biological importance is determined by the whole phytochemical profile. Thus, a technique should be developed to fully elucidate the components in a food product for evaluating the nutritional changes during thermal processing. Metabolomic analysis is used to provide a comprehensive chemical profile of as many small molecules as possible in a system (plant, cell, or food material), which allows for a more thorough and encompassing analysis of molecular composition than traditional methods. The application of metabolomic study on the tracking of dynamic compositional changes during food processing could provide a holistic view on the chemical changes and correlated reactions under various treatments of food. Thus, in recent years, metabolomic analysis has been applied in food products, such as in the investigation of nectar beverage of black raspberries (9), roasted coffee beans (10), wines (11), and extra-virgin olive oil (12).

In our previous study (8), the variation in individual flavonoids, including flavonol glycosides and anthocyanins, was investigated in two thermal processing procedures of blueberry-filled pastries. The results showed that stir-frying largely decreased the contents of flavonoids, especially anthocyanins, in blueberry filling, and baking caused less variation in flavonoid profiles. However, the changes in other phenolic compounds, which may be related to the degradation of flavonoids, and the components aside from polyphenols in the fillings remain largely undiscovered. The chemical changes and the underlying mechanisms during food production should be further studied. Food matrix is such a complex mixture that phenolic compounds, with their chemical reactivity, may undergo reactions with various compounds other than their own degradation. Therefore, a holistic view on the variation of phytochemicals in blueberries during processing is important to provide insights into the changes in bioactive compounds, and encourage and give hints for scientists to further evaluate the underlying chemical reaction mechanisms of key varying compounds. Such information on the effect of thermal processing on the phytochemical profiles in real food systems, such as blueberry pastry as in this case, remains largely limited.

The current study aims to provide useful information on the chemical changes in blueberry-containing products during thermal processing by using a widely targeted metabolomic approach. The results will present clues on the degradation of thermal-sensitive components and the interaction between bioactive compounds of the products during processing. The work also provides further insights into the utilization of widely targeted metabolomic techniques in the screening of key chemical changes and the revelation of underlying chemical mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Chemicals

Fresh blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) were imported from Chile, and all the other ingredients of blueberry-filled pastries were purchased from the local market. Methanol, acetonitrile, and acetic acid were of HPLC grade and purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany). Double deionized ultrapure water was prepared using an ultrapure-water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Chemical standards were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and BioBioPha (Kunming, Yunnan, China).

Sample Preparation for Metabolomics Analysis

Samples from the same batch of blueberry pastry filling samples prepared according to our previous study (8) were subjected to metabolomic analysis for the understanding of phytochemical changes under different processing procedures, including the raw filling, stir-fried, and baked samples (170°C, 23 min). All samples were lyophilized and crushed using a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) with a zirconia bead for 90 s at 30 Hz. Exactly 100 mg sample was then weighed accurately, extracted with 1 mL of 70% aqueous methanol overnight at 4°C by vigorously vortexing for three times. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min, the extracts were filtered (0.22 μm) into a vial for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. The quality control (QC) samples were prepared in triplicate by evenly mixing all the sample extracts tested and injected every six sample injections to monitor the measure repeatability.

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis

Exactly 2 μL of sample were injected and analyzed using a Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) interfaced to an Applied Biosystems 6500 QTRAP mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Foster, CA, USA). The sample was separated on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.8 μm) (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) by using water (0.04% acetic acid) as solvent A and acetonitrile (0.04% acetic acid) as solvent B. The eluting gradient programme was as follows: 0.0–11.0 min, 5%−95% B; 11.0–12.0 min, 95% B; 12.0–12.1 min, 95%−5% B; and 12.1–15.0 min, 5% B. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The temperature of column oven was kept at 40°C during the analysis. The effluent was connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QQQ-LIT) mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface operating in both positive and negative ion modes and controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software. The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: source temperature 500°C; ion spray voltage (IS), 5500 V; and ion source gas I (GSI)/gas II (GSII)/curtain gas (CUR), 55/60/25 psi. Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 μmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes, respectively. QQQ scans were acquired as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) experiments with collision gas set to 5 psi. Declustering potential (DP) and collision energy (CE) for individual MRM transitions were obtained with further DP and CE optimisation. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the chemicals eluted within this period.

Qualification and Quantification of Chemicals

For qualification of the chemicals, the primary and secondary mass spectrometry data were analyzed using MVDB V2.0 Database (Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) and the public database of metabolite information. The mass error comparing with the database was limited within ±0.4 Da, and the error for retention time was allowed within ±0.1 min. The interference from isotope signals, duplicate signals of K+, Na+, and ions, and duplicate signals of fragment ions derived from other larger molecules were excluded. Structural analysis of chemicals was conducted in reference to the existing mass spectrometry databases, such as MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp), KNAPSAcK (http://kanaya.naist.jp/KNApSAcK), HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca), and METLIN (http://metlin.scripps.edu/index.php). The chemicals were quantified in the MRM mode using QQQ mass spectrometry. After chemical data from different samples were obtained, the peak areas of the mass spectra of all substances were integrated, and the mass spectrum peaks of the same chemical in different samples were subjected to integration correction.

Statistical Analysis

All samples were analyzed in triplicate. To investigate the effect of different thermal processing procedures on the composition of chemicals, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and univariate analysis (UVA) on different samples were conducted with the MetaboAnalyst 4.0 platform. The thresholds for screening differential chemicals were set as follows: fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 and VIP ≥ 1.

Results and Discussion

Our previous study (8) showed that the flavonoid content varied considerably during the thermal processing of blueberry-filled pastries, and the procedures of stir-frying and baking contributed to the different levels of the loss of anthocyanins and flavonol glycosides. However, the degradation products of these flavonoids and the variation of the other phytochemicals were left undetected. Pastry filling is a complex food mixture that contains many components other than flavonoids, and various reactions may occur in addition to the simple degradation of flavonoids. A holistic view on the phytochemical changes during the production of blueberry-filled pastries will help us evaluate the nutritional changes during thermal processing. The metabolomic approach has been largely applied to investigate the metabolite changes during plant development, such as fruit ripening and seed germination (13–15).

This work applied metabolomic analysis to investigate the phytochemical changes of blueberry-filled pastry products during different thermal processing stages. All the samples were lyophilized and analyzed on the basis of dry weight mass to eliminate the water deviation between the samples in different thermal processing procedures.

Full List of Chemical Components in Raw and Thermal-Treated Samples

A total ion current chromatogram of QC sample (an even mixture of all the samples involved in this study) and a multi-peak detection plot of chemicals in the MRM mode of the same sample are illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1. The chemicals in the samples were qualified and quantified by mass spectrometry by using the MVDB V2.0 database. The appearance and abundance of different substances in various samples were evaluated by MRM analysis. As shown in Supplementary Figures 1C,D, each peak displaying a distinct color represents one compound in the sample analyzed.

A total of 630 compounds were identified in the current study in the blueberry fillings of pastries collected at different processed stages, including 148 flavonoids, 21 carbohydrates, 69 organic acids, 24 quinates and their derivatives, 19 benzoic acid derivatives, 17 coumarins, 29 hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives, 5 proanthocyanidins, 2 flavonolignans, 28 amino acids and 56 of their derivatives, 18 fatty acids, 16 glycerolipids, 35 glycerophospholipids, 4 nicotinic acid derivatives, 57 nucleotides and their derivatives, 16 phenolamides, 7 indole derivatives, 3 pyridine derivatives, 4 cholines, 7 alcohols and polyols, 7 alkaloids, 7 tryptamine derivatives, 3 terpenoids, and 28 other chemicals. Amongst them, the largest group was flavonoid, which consisted of 13 anthocyanins, 10 catechin derivatives, 17 flavanones, 37 flavones, 26 flavone C-glycosides, 38 flavonols, and 7 isoflavones. The name and molecular formula of compounds, their precursor and product ions for qualification and quantification with MRM, and the peak integration values of the compounds are all listed in Supplementary Table 1. To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to utilize the targeted UHPLC-MS/MS-based metabolomic approach in analyzing the chemical variations in fruit fillings of bakery products under different thermal treatments. Such a large amount of the compositional information provides a comprehensive understanding of the chemical changes in berries commonly enriched with bioactive polyphenols when subjected to thermal processing.

Difference in the Composition Amongst Raw, Stir-Fried, and Baked Blueberry Fillings

PCA and HCA were applied to analyze the data obtained for a full view of the differences between the blueberry filling samples obtained at different processing stages. The PCA score scatter plot (Figure 1) showed that samples obtained at different processing stages could be well-distinguished. The QC samples, as a mixture of all the three samples investigated, were located in the middle of the plot. The PC1 explained 56.11% of the variances of chemical data of all the samples investigated and predominantly distinguished the raw filling samples from the thermally treated samples, such as stir-fried and baked samples. PC2 explained only 13.51% of the variances of chemical data and distinguished mainly the stir-fried filling samples from the baked filling samples. This finding indicated that stir-frying and baking dramatically changed the composition of blueberry fillings. This finding was further confirmed by the heatmap of the hierarchical clustering analysis of differential chemicals amongst samples of raw, fried, and baked fillings (Figure 2). A total of 288 differential chemicals were screened by UVA. The HCA of the 288 differential chemicals in the three samples showed clear grouping patterns. The color sequence from red to green indicates a decrease in chemical contents. The abscissa of the thermogram indicates the different sample groups, and the ordinate indicates the differential chemicals identified between groups. According to the Venn diagram shown in Figure 3, 197 and 238 chemicals significantly differed (fold change ≤ 0.5 or ≥ 2, and VIP ≥ 1) between raw and fried fillings and between raw and baked fillings, respectively. However, the number of differential chemicals in fried filling vs. baked filling was only 75, which confirmed our previous finding that stir-frying was the major step contributing to the most variation in chemicals during blueberry pastry preparation (8). Consistently, the heatmap of HCA showed larger differences in abundance between raw and fried fillings than those between baked and fried fillings (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Amongst 288 differential compounds, 117 belonged to the group of phenolic compounds (Table 1), including 18 flavones (out of 37 flavones detected), 13 anthocyanins (13), 21 flavonols (38), 12 flavone C-glycosides (26), 8 flavanones (17), 14 benzoic acid derivatives (19), 14 hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives (29), 4 catechin derivatives (10), 5 coumarins (17), 6 quinates and their derivatives (24), 1 isoflavone (7), and 1 proanthocyanidin (5). The other compounds (Table 2) included 34 nucleotides and their derivatives (57), 29 glycerophospholipids (35), 21 organic acids (69), 5 amino acids (28), 22 amino acid derivatives (56), 13 glycerolipids (16), 8 carbohydrates (21), 8 phenolamides (16), 6 fatty acids (18), 3 tryptamine derivatives (7), 3 indole derivatives (7), 2 alkaloids (7), 2 terpenoids (3), 2 nicotinic acid derivatives (4), 2 alcohols and polyols (7), 1 pyridine derivative (3), and 1 choline (4). However, the flavonolignans detected in the fillings did not vary during the processing of pastries.

Table 1

ChemicalClassFried filling vs. raw fillingBaked filling vs. fried fillingBaked filling vs. raw filling
Variation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/down regulatedVariation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/down regulatedVariation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/down regulated
Peonidin O-hexosideAnthocyanins−69.84%1.200.30Down-−83.68%1.240.16Down
Cyanidin 3-O-malonylhexosideAnthocyanins-−66.66%1.110.00Down−100.00%1.240.00Down
Rosinidin O-hexosideAnthocyanins−73.88%1.150.26Down-−80.74%1.220.19Down
Cyanidin 3-O-galactosideAnthocyanins−76.09%1.200.24Down−54.24%1.420.46Down−89.01%1.220.11Down
PeonidinAnthocyanins−52.49%1.130.47Down-−57.59%1.220.42Down
Cyanidin O-syringic acidAnthocyanins−80.69%1.200.19Down-−88.68%1.230.11Down
DelphinidinAnthocyanins−68.14%1.180.32Down--
Malvidin 3-O-galactosideAnthocyanins−69.24%1.200.31Down−51.86%1.420.49Down−85.07%1.220.15Down
Malvidin 3-O-glucosideAnthocyanins−71.62%1.210.28Down-−84.92%1.220.15Down
Delphinidin 3-O-galactosideAnthocyanins−81.20%1.200.19Down−53.80%1.400.46Down−91.23%1.220.09Down
Cyanidin 3,5-O-diglucosideAnthocyanins−100.00%1.210.00Down-−100.00%1.240.00Down
Petunidin 3-O-galactosideAnthocyanins−70.94%1.200.29Down−55.12%1.430.45Down−86.81%1.220.13Down
Pelargonidin 3-O-beta-D-glucosideAnthocyanins−71.03%1.200.29Down-−81.46%1.240.18Down
p-AminobenzoateBenzoic acid derivatives--110.35%1.152.10Up
8-Methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-2H-chromen-7-yl 4-(hexyloxy)benzoateBenzoic acid derivatives−66.26%1.160.34Down-−68.53%1.200.30Down
Methyl gallateBenzoic acid derivatives240.94%1.183.39Up-244.30%1.223.38Up
VanillinBenzoic acid derivatives154.28%1.132.43Up-189.27%1.152.66Up
Gallic acidBenzoic acid derivatives504.62%1.206.05Up-614.96%1.247.11Up
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acidBenzoic acid derivatives383.65%1.194.78Up-528.36%1.236.08Up
4-HydroxybenzaldehydeBenzoic acid derivatives157.09%1.192.57Up-274.27%1.233.70Up
2,3-Dihydroxybenzoic acidBenzoic acid derivatives438.59%1.205.39Up584.63%1.246.77Up
4-Hydroxybenzoic acidBenzoic acid derivatives-123.11%1.202.18Up
2-(Formylamino)benzoic acidBenzoic acid derivatives143.61%1.162.39Up207.25%1.202.95Up
Anthranilic acidBenzoic acid derivatives167.46%1.182.65Up-166.59%1.202.63Up
SyringaldehydeBenzoic acid derivatives202.84%1.203.03Up-245.88%1.243.46Up
Vanillic acidBenzoic acid derivatives172.84%1.172.69Up-225.36%1.213.13Up
Syringic acidBenzoic acid derivatives854.07%1.209.52Up-1072.42%1.2411.58Up
Gallocatechin-gallocatechinCatechin derivatives-−100.00%1.620.00Down−100.00%1.240.00Down
EpigallocatechinCatechin derivatives590.56%1.206.85Up-511.38%1.246.09Up
Protocatechuic acidCatechin derivatives429.20%1.205.29Up-575.14%1.246.70Up
Protocatechuic aldehydeCatechin derivatives378.86%1.204.72Up-439.77%1.235.25Up
O-Feruloyl 4-hydroxylcoumarinCoumarins−58.15%1.180.41Down-−60.44%1.140.39Down
6,7-dihydroxycoumarin 7-O-quinic acidCoumarins−48.02%1.080.50Down--
7-Hydroxy-5-methoxycoumarinCoumarins--205.85%1.222.98Up
6-Methoxy-7,8-dihydroxycoumarinCoumarins1319.84%1.1310.17Up126.94%1.592.21Up3402.35%1.2022.46Up
ScoparoneCoumarins-−66.62%1.180.00Down−99.96%1.240.00Down
Naringenin O-malonylhexosideFlavanone−68.07%1.140.32Down-−72.48%1.180.27Down
4′-Hydroxy-5,7-dimethoxyflavanoneFlavanone114.58%1.122.12Up--
NaringeninFlavanone236.74%1.173.29Up-369.93%1.224.57Up
PhloretinFlavanone--113.43%1.202.14Up
EriodictyolFlavanone--150.83%1.232.50Up
Naringenin chalconeFlavanone235.51%1.163.30Up-373.97%1.224.63Up
sakuranetinFlavanone+1.0228.50Up-+1.0434.41Up
3,5,7,4′-TetrahydroxyflavanFlavanone--−62.12%1.170.38Down
Selgin O-malonylhexosideFlavone−65.72%1.190.34Down-−70.87%1.210.29Down
Chrysin O-malonylhexosideFlavone−68.60%1.170.32Down--
SpinacetinFlavone−53.97%1.180.46Down--
Chrysoeriol 7-O-rutinosideFlavone−55.04%1.190.45Down-−49.31%1.150.49Down
Chrysoeriol O-hexosyl-O-hexosideFlavone−54.84%1.170.45Down-−63.23%1.220.37Down
Apigenin 7-O-glucosideFlavone--−59.36%1.010.31Down
Tricin 5-O-hexosyl-O-hexosideFlavone+1.2179789.26Up-+1.24156066.67Up
Tricin O-rhamnosideFlavone−99.96%1.200.00Down--
Tricin 5-O-rutinosideFlavone−85.13%1.180.15Down-−91.00%1.230.09Down
Tricin O-hexosyl-O-syringin alcoholFlavone+1.211511.37Up-+1.241384.53Up
TricinFlavone--119.60%1.182.18Up
Acacetin O-acetyl hexosideFlavone-124.85%1.452.10Up-
Chrysoeriol O-acetylhexosideFlavone−49.75%1.100.47Down--
Apigenin 7-O-neohesperidosideFlavone--135.33%1.182.29Up
ChrysoeriolFlavone--174.73%1.202.75Up
NobiletinFlavone-−37.89%1.100.49Down−76.47%1.210.23Down
TangeretinFlavone−51.21%1.010.50Down-−67.96%1.190.30Down
ButinFlavone240.50%1.163.31Up-369.59%1.214.53Up
C-hexosyl-chrysoeriol O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides−63.15%1.200.37Down-−69.53%1.240.30Down
Chrysoeriol 6-C-hexoside 8-C-hexoside-O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides--−48.82%1.070.47Down
6-C-hexosyl-hesperetin O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides−63.02%1.190.36Down-−63.59%1.140.37Down
di-C,C-hexosyl-apigeninFlavone C-glycosides−57.05%1.190.43Down-−73.00%1.240.27Down
C-hexosyl-luteolin O-p-coumaroylhexosideFlavone C-glycosides--−53.56%1.070.46Down
Chrysoeriol C-hexosyl-O-rhamnosideFlavone C-glycosides−75.75%1.200.24Down-−86.98%1.240.13Down
8-C-hexosyl-luteolin O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides−65.15%1.150.35Down-−69.36%1.200.30Down
Luteolin 8-C-hexosyl-O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides−52.23%1.160.48Down-−59.09%1.220.41Down
C-hexosyl-apigenin C-pentosideFlavone C-glycosides−55.05%1.160.44Down--
8-C-hexosyl chrysoeriol O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides+1.217587.37Up-+1.2411791.56Up
Hesperetin C-hexoside O-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides12525.71%1.20122.18Up-22757.50%1.24225.37Up
Luteolin C-hexosideFlavone C-glycosides--100.60%1.072.03Up
methylQuercetin O-hexosideFlavonol−65.77%1.120.35Down-−75.25%1.200.24Down
Quercetin-3,4′-O-diglucosideFlavonol−74.25%1.190.25Down-−74.92%1.230.25Down
Isorhamnetin O-hexosideFlavonol−53.44%1.200.47Down-−54.86%1.240.45Down
Isorhamnetin 5-O-hexosideFlavonol−53.71%1.190.46Down-−54.57%1.220.45Down
Quercetin 7-O-malonylhexosyl-hexosideFlavonol−50.51%1.140.49Down-−60.68%1.160.38Down
KaempferolFlavonol--260.46%1.233.59Up
QuercetinFlavonol250.40%1.203.50Up-457.89%1.245.58Up
Quercetin-3-arabinosideFlavonol−58.34%1.200.42Down-−62.80%1.240.37Down
Kaempferol 3-O-rutinosideFlavonol--−55.41%1.220.44Down
MyricetinFlavonol--132.31%1.232.30Up
DihydroquercetinFlavonol141.38%1.052.32Up-177.36%1.142.56Up
IsorhamnetinFlavonol379.09%1.184.83Up-809.31%1.249.08Up
Kaempferol 3-O-robinobiosideFlavonol--−52.56%1.230.47Down
Kaempferol 3,7-dirhamnosideFlavonol--−55.36%1.130.43Down
Kaempferol 3-O-galactosideFlavonol−60.27%1.190.40Down-−63.19%1.240.37Down
7-O-methxyl quercetinFlavonol+1.0740.97Up-+1.1377.36Up
SyringetinFlavonol865.90%1.199.65Up-1433.02%1.2414.75Up
LaricitrinFlavonol291.91%1.193.93Up-524.32%1.236.16Up
Quercetin 7-O-β-D-GlucuronideFlavonol−69.41%1.120.31Down-−72.95%1.210.27Down
Kaempferol-3-O-robinoside-7-O-rhamnosideFlavonol−62.14%1.180.38Down-−62.38%1.160.37Down
MorinFlavonol255.78%1.183.58Up-461.44%1.245.59Up
6-HydroxymethylherniarinHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives--−50.96%1.230.49Down
Hydroxy-methoxycinnamateHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives--−52.88%1.240.47Down
4-Methoxycinnamic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives−71.75%1.150.28Down-−71.58%1.190.28Down
Cinnamic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives132.86%1.112.32Up-239.69%1.193.28Up
Ferulic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives138.88%1.182.38Up-207.47%1.233.05Up
Homovanillic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives−49.78%1.130.49Down--
3-Hydroxy-4-methoxycinnamic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives148.04%1.172.48Up-211.79%1.233.08Up
p-Coumaric acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives136.18%1.152.34Up-201.03%1.212.91Up
Sinapic acidHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives1014.76%1.2011.11Up-1407.51%1.2415.04Up
Sinapyl alcoholHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives128.98%1.092.18Up--
p-Coumaryl alcoholHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives−99.95%1.200.00Down+1.08129.93Up-
SinapinaldehydeHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives186.15%1.112.74Up-259.93%1.153.47Up
p-CoumaraldehydeHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives−53.49%1.160.45Down-−55.49%1.200.43Down
Caffeyl alcoholHydroxycinnamoyl derivatives−54.80%1.100.44Down--
GlycitinIsoflavone−49.66%1.160.50Down-−49.56%1.090.49Down
Procyanidin A3Proanthocyanidins256.20%1.193.51Up-335.10%1.234.24Up
1-O-Feruloyl quinic acidQuinate and its derivatives−56.96%1.190.43Down-−59.22%1.230.40Down
O-Feruloyl quinic acidQuinate and its derivatives136.07%1.202.36Up-153.40%1.232.53Up
5-O-p-Coumaroyl shikimic acidQuinate and its derivatives−64.98%1.180.34Down-−70.22%1.190.30Down
Eudesmoyl quinic acidQuinate and its derivatives359.65%1.093.80Up-388.12%1.103.71Up
5-O-p-coumaroyl shikimic acid O-hexosideQuinate and its derivatives−75.15%1.200.25Down-−86.58%1.230.13Down
Chlorogenic acid methyl esterQuinate and its derivatives−51.93%1.130.47Down-−57.72%1.140.39Down

List of differential chemicals belonging to phenolic compounds and their variations under different thermal processing procedures.

+, Newly occurred after the corresponding thermal treatment.

Table 2

ChemicalClassFried filling vs. raw fillingBaked filling vs. fried fillingBaked filling vs. raw filling
Variation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/Down regulatedVariation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/Down regulatedVariation percentage (%)VIPFold changeUp/Down regulated
D(-)-ThreoseCarbohydrates−88.98%1.200.11Down-−86.79%1.230.13Down
Ribulose-5-phosphateCarbohydrates122.78%1.022.01Up--
GlucosamineCarbohydrates--+1.0155.75Up
D(+)-Melezitose O-rhamnosideCarbohydrates−48.78%1.150.50Down−58.26%1.580.41Down−79.40%1.220.21Down
Trehalose 6-phosphateCarbohydrates--235.19%1.163.37Up
D(+)-MelezitoseCarbohydrates--236.92%1.032.56Up
D-(+)-Glucono-1,5-lactoneCarbohydrates122.72%1.202.22Up-149.99%1.222.50Up
L-FucoseCarbohydrates543.66%1.196.45Up-392.67%1.204.91Up
L-HistidineAmino acids--−59.43%1.200.40Down
L-(+)-ArginineAmino acids--−59.68%1.230.40Down
L-MethionineAmino acids−65.76%1.190.34Down-−64.68%1.240.35Down
L-GlutamineAmino acids−64.62%1.200.35Down−56.97%1.580.42Down−85.10%1.240.15Down
L(+)-OrnithineAmino acids−52.14%1.170.48Down--
Lysine butyrateAmino acid derivatives-+1.3460.90Up+1.13213.85Up
N-AcetylmethionineAmino acid derivatives−74.42%1.200.26Down-−78.16%1.230.22Down
Acetyl tryptophanAmino acid derivatives--158.90%1.032.53Up
L-Glutamine O-hexsideAmino acid derivatives329.84%1.194.28Up−51.52%1.560.48Down104.88%1.232.04Up
L-Glutamic acid O-glucosideAmino acid derivatives277.32%1.173.65Up-156.72%1.212.50Up
3-(2-Naphthyl)-D-alanineAmino acid derivatives-−53.37%1.430.44Down−53.56%1.010.42Down
Glutathione oxidizedAmino acid derivatives--−57.12%1.230.43Down
N-Acetyl-L-glutamic acidAmino acid derivatives139.85%1.192.38Up-143.20%1.222.41Up
(-)-3-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-2-methylalanineAmino acid derivatives201.64%1.172.89Up-183.83%1.182.67Up
Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acidAmino acid derivatives666.89%1.207.55Up-879.38%1.239.62Up
Phenylacetyl-L-glutamineAmino acid derivatives--197.73%1.102.71Up
N-(3-Indolylacetyl)-L-alanineAmino acid derivatives--−48.02%1.110.50Down
Glutathione reduced formAmino acid derivatives−66.52%1.120.30Down-−81.85%1.210.17Down
N′-FormylkynurenineAmino acid derivatives--106.42%1.222.07Up
L-Pipecolic acidAmino acid derivatives148.41%1.202.47Up-191.76%1.242.90Up
3-N-Methyl-L-histidineAmino acid derivatives−68.42%1.180.31Down-−53.13%1.150.45Down
Phe-PheAmino acid derivatives--−49.19%1.130.49Down
S-(5′-Adenosyl)-L-methionineAmino acid derivatives−99.31%1.040.01Down−66.43%1.180.01Down−100.00%1.240.00Down
N-PhenylacetylglycineAmino acid derivatives-436.94%1.595.48Up257.74%1.183.65Up
Hexanoyl glycineAmino acid derivatives--208.35%1.022.59Up
CYS-GLYAmino acid derivatives-+1.112.37Up−61.97%1.130.36Down
H-HomoArg-OHAmino acid derivatives--−52.09%1.180.47Down
1,4-dihydro-1-Methyl-4-oxo-3-pyridinecarboxamidePyridine derivatives−56.87%1.190.43Down--
PantothenolAlcohols and polyols−85.25%1.200.15Down-−88.42%1.240.12Down
1,5-Anhydro-D-glucitolAlcohols and polyols1059.15%1.2011.23Up-956.15%1.239.96Up
sn-Glycero-3-phosphocholineCholines--223.75%1.213.17Up
N′, N″-disinapoylspermidinePhenolamides--−59.34%1.170.40Down
N-Feruloyl spermidinePhenolamides−65.26%1.170.34Down−47.97%1.340.49Down−82.69%1.180.17Down
SpermidinePhenolamides1080.60%1.1911.07Up-616.06%1.216.89Up
AgmatinePhenolamides390.76%1.194.72Up-315.40%1.083.80Up
N-(4′-O-glycosyl)-p-coumaroyl agmatinePhenolamides−59.81%1.190.40Down-−75.60%1.240.24Down
N′-Feruloyl putrescinePhenolamides--−99.99%1.240.00Down
N-Feruloyl putrescinePhenolamides−65.83%1.090.34Down-−80.08%1.210.20Down
N-AcetylputrescinePhenolamides633.73%1.197.16Up-589.41%1.206.84Up
N2-methylguanosineNucleotide and its derivatives--−56.92%1.210.43Down
Adenosine 3′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivatives354.12%1.194.54Up-384.82%1.234.79Up
Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotideNucleotide and its derivatives−79.78%1.200.20Down−58.38%1.510.42Down−91.49%1.230.08Down
Inosine 5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivatives307.27%1.184.01Up-302.25%1.203.86Up
iP7GNucleotide and its derivatives454.83%1.195.41Up-959.51%1.2310.60Up
Adenosine 5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivatives260.29%1.193.59Up-280.91%1.223.77Up
Guanosine 5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivatives--150.43%1.152.51Up
Uridine 5′-diphospho-D-glucoseNucleotide and its derivatives−63.26%1.170.36Down−50.79%1.540.49Down−82.24%1.240.18Down
2′-Deoxyinosine-5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivatives−65.70%1.200.34Down-−80.44%1.220.19Down
Adenosine O-riboseNucleotide and its derivatives−58.63%1.200.41Down-−52.89%1.160.47Down
UridineNucleotide and its derivatives−58.53%1.190.41Down--
CytosineNucleotide and its derivatives-140.29%1.572.36Up-
AdenineNucleotide and its derivatives−50.73%1.190.49Down--
β-Nicotinamide mononucleotideNucleotide and its derivatives−84.25%1.200.16Down−58.14%1.580.40Down−93.66%1.240.06Down
1-MethylxanthineNucleotide and its derivatives+1.215315.81Up-+1.244970.37Up
AdenosineNucleotide and its derivatives107.54%1.202.07Up-158.06%1.102.60Up
5-MethyluridineNucleotide and its derivatives+1.2118098.52Up-+1.2420249.26Up
GuanineNucleotide and its derivatives--102.46%1.222.01Up
InosineNucleotide and its derivatives-108.31%1.542.03Up-
GuanosineNucleotide and its derivates−55.49%1.200.45Down--
DeoxyguanosineNucleotide and its derivates−77.80%1.190.22Down677.30%1.577.20Up-
2′-Deoxycytidine-5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivates+1.2140852.96Up--
1-MethyladenosineNucleotide and its derivates854.79%1.209.43Up-1488.22%1.2415.92Up
5′-Deoxy-5′-(methylthio)adenosineNucleotide and its derivates276.54%1.203.77Up-242.45%1.233.43Up
Guanosine monophosphateNucleotide and its derivates317.07%1.194.07Up-419.44%1.235.07Up
1,7-DimethylxanthineNucleotide and its derivates−96.78%1.200.03Down163.97%1.412.37Up−92.39%1.230.08Down
Cytidine 5′-monophosphateNucleotide and its derivates123.40%1.182.22Up-230.48%1.213.27Up
Cyclic AMPNucleotide and its derivates−99.98%1.210.00Down+1.6338850.37Up503.61%1.146.28Up
8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosineNucleotide and its derivates-188.52%1.242.96Up-
CytidineNucleotide and its derivates-155.64%1.552.58Up103.59%1.132.02Up
Guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphateNucleotide and its derivates2206.16%1.2022.35Up-3051.38%1.2429.88Up
DeoxyadenosineNucleotide and its derivates-309.47%1.484.07Up598.04%1.167.21Up
2-(dimethylamino)guanosineNucleotide and its derivates-98.90%1.312.02Up-
Hypoxanthine-9-β-D-arabinofuranosideNucleotide and its derivates-108.11%1.502.08Up-
N-hexosyl-p-coumaroyl serotoninTryptamine derivatives−64.78%1.190.35Down-−76.01%1.210.24Down
N-Feruloyl serotoninTryptamine derivatives−54.01%1.050.41Down--
N-Feruloyl tryptamineTryptamine derivatives−65.74%1.200.34Down-−61.59%1.230.38Down
CamptothecinAlkaloids115.81%1.142.09Up-150.83%1.152.37Up
BetaineAlkaloids211.70%1.203.09Up602.30%1.617.03Up2121.08%1.2421.72Up
Phytocassane DTerpenoids−71.27%1.180.28Down-−65.36%1.090.36Down
LimoninTerpenoids+1.211666.70Up-+1.242001.59Up
Nicotinate ribonucleosideNicotinic acid derivatives--−56.92%1.230.43Down
Nicotinic acidNicotinic acid derivatives117.40%1.202.17Up-170.28%1.232.70Up
5-methoxyindole-3-carbaldehydeIndole derivatives−71.95%1.130.27Down--
Indole-5-carboxylic acidIndole derivatives--163.20%1.162.52Up
5-Hydroxyindole-3-acetic acidIndole derivatives--−56.11%1.230.44Down
Methylglutaric acidOrganic acids−65.52%1.190.34Down−51.92%1.510.47Down−83.88%1.230.16Down
2-Aminoethanesulfinic acidOrganic acids470.39%1.144.89Up-695.50%1.186.59Up
2–Furoic acidOrganic acids+1.21841940.74Up-+1.241084903.70Up
Glutaric acidOrganic acids133.63%1.202.33Up-166.27%1.242.66Up
4-OxopentanoateOrganic acids214.66%1.032.79Up-168.42%1.112.41Up
Terephthalic acidOrganic acids--136.19%1.192.33Up
2-Picolinic acidOrganic acids208.13%1.203.08Up-309.17%1.244.09Up
Homogentisic acidOrganic acids1160.72%1.2012.56Up-1485.63%1.2415.76Up
D-Pantothenic acidOrganic acids−65.31%1.180.34Down--
3-Hydroxy-3-methyl butyric acidOrganic acids130.04%1.162.24Up-137.70%1.202.33Up
D-ErythronolactoneOrganic acids185.54%1.172.78Up106.46%1.522.06Up475.33%1.225.74Up
CreatineOrganic acids-1146.83%1.6112.45Up678.39%1.217.80Up
2-Aminoethanesulfonic acidOrganic acids578.57%1.206.73Up-1188.64%1.2312.97Up
Suberic acidOrganic acids197.14%1.142.85Up-177.00%1.182.65Up
Citraconic acidOrganic acids+1.21231022.22Up-+1.24256744.44Up
Mandelic acidOrganic acids--117.32%1.062.20Up
A-Ketoglutaric acidOrganic acids114.87%1.202.15Up-126.45%1.222.26Up
3,4-Dihydroxybenzeneacetic acidOrganic acids943.16%1.199.73Up-1275.36%1.2312.81Up
ethylmalonateOrganic acids106.55%1.142.00Up-144.32%1.192.42Up
(Rs)-Mevalonic acidOrganic acids1509.63%1.1814.18Up-2493.85%1.2322.74Up
trans,trans-Muconic acidOrganic acids261.50%1.183.50Up-473.77%1.235.59Up
LysoPC 16:1Lipids_Glycerophospholipids160.83%1.132.45Up-206.03%1.202.94Up
LysoPC 18:2Lipids_Glycerophospholipids202.86%1.142.93Up122.13%1.422.13Up538.39%1.226.24Up
LysoPC 18:3Lipids_Glycerophospholipids236.76%1.043.03Up123.49%1.192.11Up578.88%1.186.40Up
LysoPC 16:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids196.70%1.112.86Up-406.37%1.205.03Up
LysoPC 18:1 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-192.53%1.522.85Up192.96%1.202.90Up
LysoPC 18:3 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids--122.54%1.162.13Up
LysoPC 14:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-341.02%1.574.35Up201.51%1.162.92Up
LysoPE 18:2 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids--253.95%1.183.46Up
LysoPE 18:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids226.78%1.032.84Up220.96%1.432.96Up765.64%1.198.42Up
LysoPE 18:2Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−52.50%1.160.47Down165.92%1.452.64Up-
LysoPC 18:1Lipids_Glycerophospholipids--280.22%1.153.58Up
LysoPE 18:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−91.76%1.160.07Down1511.34%1.5915.50Up-
LysoPC 10:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−55.99%1.050.40Down332.05%1.503.97Up-
LysoPC 19:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids187.22%1.112.79Up597.01%1.596.54Up1900.05%1.2318.22Up
LysoPC 15:1Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-222.20%1.523.09Up232.09%1.183.23Up
LysoPC 15:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-275.37%1.563.77Up217.58%1.163.14Up
PC 19:2/16:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-431.85%1.253.50Up59007.31%1.0758.69Up
LysoPC 18:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-197.08%1.472.98Up181.91%1.122.71Up
LysoPC 17:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-165.57%1.382.72Up-
LysoPE 18:1Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−80.13%1.170.20Down134.47%1.522.23Up−54.06%1.160.45Down
LysoPE 18:1 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−62.34%1.170.37Down291.54%1.613.80Up-
LysoPC 20:4Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-232.49%1.503.27Up238.49%1.173.24Up
LysoPC 14:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids−53.71%1.120.46Down269.23%1.563.48Up-
LysoPC 16:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids295.77%1.153.82Up127.99%1.382.18Up745.08%1.228.32Up
LysoPC 18:0Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-401.07%1.565.04Up521.49%1.185.80Up
LysoPC 20:1 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-128.93%1.532.30Up-
LysoPC 20:1Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-129.41%1.532.31Up-
LysoPE 14:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids-139.83%1.552.26Up-
LysoPE 16:0 (2n isomer)Lipids_Glycerophospholipids185.01%1.102.77Up-419.60%1.225.19Up
DGMG (18:2) isomer1Lipids_Glycerolipids-192.32%1.123.02Up-
DGMG (18:2) isomer3Lipids_Glycerolipids-420.39%1.485.14Up683.96%1.187.44Up
MAG (18:2) isomer1Lipids_Glycerolipids-440.62%1.475.60Up597.46%1.156.26Up
MAG (18:4) isomer2Lipids_Glycerolipids-157.95%1.462.48Up-
MAG (18:1) isomer2Lipids_Glycerolipids-191.58%1.182.97Up-
MAG (18:2)Lipids_Glycerolipids−56.04%1.080.40Down--
MAG (18:3) isomer3Lipids_Glycerolipids-201.68%1.132.87Up320.09%1.034.11Up
MGMG (18:2) isomer1Lipids_Glycerolipids-994.36%1.6011.05Up1361.25%1.2314.08Up
MAG (18:3) isomer4Lipids_Glycerolipids−50.80%1.040.44Down--
MAG (18:3) isomer2Lipids_Glycerolipids-−77.99%1.200.23Down-
MAG (18:1) isomer1Lipids_Glycerolipids−70.79%1.170.28Down--
MGMG (18:2) isomer2Lipids_Glycerolipids-219.11%1.292.64Up207.38%1.112.91Up
MAG (18:3) isomer1Lipids_Glycerolipids-121.22%1.122.23Up-
14,15-Dehydrocrepenynic acidLipids_Fatty acids−93.89%1.200.06Down-−92.86%1.240.07Down
delta-TridecalactoneLipids_Fatty acids+1.215796.89Up-+1.246310.04Up
Punicic acidLipids_Fatty acids−76.28%1.160.23Down-−67.90%1.180.32Down
9,10-EODELipids_Fatty acids−71.04%1.090.30Down-−56.12%1.180.43Down
9-HOTrELipids_Fatty acids−78.29%1.150.22Down-−75.34%1.220.24Down
12,13-EODELipids_Fatty acids-145.94%1.432.15Up-
DIMBOA glucosideOthers-524.36%1.586.18Up567.10%1.196.33Up
2-AminoethylphosphonateOthers--−57.49%1.210.42Down
AminopurineOthers105.95%1.202.06Up-196.03%1.222.97Up
4-Methyl-5-thiazoleethanolOthers458.52%1.205.54Up-557.25%1.246.52Up
D-erythro-DihydrosphingosineOthers-214.58%1.402.73Up-
Phellodensin FOthers−69.62%1.170.31Down−55.57%1.510.44Down−86.65%1.230.13Down
Cocamidopropyl betaineOthers−51.36%1.120.48Down--
L-CarnitineOthers-589.72%1.596.94Up-
NADPOthers−84.28%1.190.16Down-−92.34%1.220.08Down

List of differential chemicals other than phenolic compounds and their variations under different thermal processing procedures.

+, Newly occurred after the corresponding thermal treatment(s).

Variation in the Phenolic Composition of Blueberry Fillings During Thermal Processing

All the anthocyanins showed decreasing trends during the preparation of blueberry-filled pastries, and the most variation occurred at the stir-frying stage. This result was in accordance with our previous finding (8) in which anthocyanins were the most sensitive toward stir-frying and less sensitive to baking, which should be most likely attributed to the higher temperature and longer period of heating occurred during stir-firing than baking. Moreover, the low concentration of oxygen in the sealed fillings might decrease the reduction in flavonoids under baking conditions (16), while abundant air perfused into the fillings and accelerated the degradation of flavonoids during stir-frying.

Except for cyanidin 3-O-malonylhexoside, the contents of all the anthocyanins decreased by 52–100% during stir-frying in the current study. However, during baking, cyanidin 3-O-malonylhexoside along with four other anthocyanins, namely cyanidin 3-O-galactoside, malvidin 3-O-galactoside, delphinidin 3-O-galactoside, and petunidin 3-O-galactoside, decreased by 52–67%. Cyanidin 3,5-O-diglucoside was neither detected in the fried filling nor in the baked filling. Therefore, it was totally degraded after thermal treatment. Cyanidin 3,5-O-diglucoside was identified by Hou et al. (17) in the anthocyanin-rich extract from black rice and was found to be comparable to the other anthocyanins detected in terms of thermal sensitivity because of the low values of activation energies (Ea). Cevallos-Casals and Cisneros-Zevallos (18) suggested that sugars and their degradation products might accelerate the degradation of anthocyanins because of the association of the degradation rate of anthocyanin with the degradation rate of sugars to furfural-type compounds derived from the Maillard reaction. 2-Furoic acid, which is an oxidation product of furfural that originated from the decomposition of sugars, and ascorbic acid (19, 20) was found to be produced in the fillings after thermal processing (Table 1). Moreover, Louarme and Billaud (21) demonstrated that the production of 2-furoic acid depended on the oxidative degradation reactions of ascorbic acid rather than the thermal degradations, which might explain the remarkable occurrence of the compound during stir-frying (high oxygen exposure and long heating period) but mild changes under baking (low oxygen exposure in the sealed fillings and short period of heating).

Some flavonol aglycones detected in the current study increased considerably after thermal treatment by stir-frying, accompanying the decreases in the contents of their glycosides (Table 1). For example, the abundance of quercetin increased by 2.5 times, whereas some of its glycosides, such as quercetin-3,4′-O-diglucoside, quercetin 7-O-malonylhexosyl-hexoside, and quercetin 3-arabinoside, decreased remarkably after stir-frying. Kaempferol glycosides, such as kaempferol 3-O-galactoside, kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside, kaempferol 3-O-robinobioside, kaempferol 3,7-dirhamnoside, and kaempferol-3-O-robinoside-7-O-rhamnoside, decreased after thermal processing, whereas the aglycone kaempferol increased. The decreasing trends of the flavonol glycosides could be attributed to the deglycosylation that occurred during thermal processing as discussed in our previous study (8).

Changes in other phenolic compounds in blueberry filling during pastry preparation can be also determined by the widely targeted metabolomic analysis with UHPLC-MS/MS. For example, protocatechuic acid in the blueberry filling increased by four times after stir-frying. Protocatechuic acid was reported to be thermally degraded from cyanidin by the liberation of the catecholic B-ring or from flavonoids such as quercetin (9). It shared the same ortho-dihydroxyphenyl chemical moiety with cyanidin, which was reported to be critical for the biological properties of anthocyanins (22, 23). Thus, the degradation of cyanidin to protocatechuic acid might not result in the reduction of bioactivity. Protocatechuic acid was demonstrated to possess chemopreventive activity against several different types of cancers in animal and cell studies (24, 25). Coumarins are another group of phenolic compounds that possess various biological and therapeutic properties such as anti-oxidant, anti-microbial, anti-viral, anti-diabetic, anti-coagulant, estrogenic, vasodilator, anti-convulsant, anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensive, and anti-cancer activities (26). In blueberry fillings, the amount of 6-methoxy-7,8-dihydroxycoumarin increased remarkably by 13 times after stir-frying, and by 34 times by the end of thermal processing. The degradation of anthocyanins might contribute to the increase (27). Moreover, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid was also reported to be the thermal degradation product of anthocyanin pelargonidin-3-glucoside (28). Although its content did not increase significantly in the filling after stir-frying, the abundance of pelargonidin-3-glucoside decreased remarkably. However, the final abundance of the compound increased significantly in the baked product compared with the raw filling. Other benzoic acid derivatives, such as gallic acid, vanillin, syringaldehyde, methyl gallate, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, anthranilic acid, and 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid, showed elevations in the filling after stir-frying. The increases in the amounts of vanillin, syringaldehyde, phenol, and phenol derivatives during heat treatment might be attributed to the thermal degradation of lignin (29). The thermal decomposition of the lignin polymer commonly started with the cleavage of the α-ether and β-ether bonds. As a result, a mixture of phenol-, guaiacyl-, and syringyl-type derivatives with their substituents in the aromatic ring was released (30); the attack of oxygen might lead to the formation of aromatic aldehydes and ketones (31). Amongst the hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives detected, 12 varied under the stir-frying treatment. Ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, and sinapic acid showed increasing trends similar to that of benzoic acid derivatives. Moreover, the catechin derivatives, protocatechuic acid, protocatechuic aldehyde, and epigallocatechin showed increasing trends during stir-frying. The increases in these phenolic acids might be explained by the thermal degradation of flavonoids and the release of bound phenolic compounds from the insoluble polymers in the fruits under heat treatments (32, 33).

Amongst the flavanones, the abundance of naringenin and its chalcone increased after stir-frying, whereas that of naringenin O-malonylhexoside decreased. Lou et al. (34) observed increases in the amounts of naringenin, tangeretin, and gallic acid in the immature calamondin after heat treatment at 150°C for 1.5 h and attributed these increases to the liberation of the compound from the immature calamondin peel during heating. Heat treatment could cause the degradation of cell wall structure to release the bound phenolic acids. Accordingly, the contents of tangeretin and gallic acid in the blueberry filling also increased after stir-frying (Table 1). However, none of the flavanones displayed notable changes in fillings during baking. Interestingly, sakuranetin, which is a methylation product of naringenin and has not been detected in the raw fillings, was produced in fried and baked fillings. Although the biosynthesis of sakuranetin from naringenin in plants (35) and the reversable O-demethylation of sakuranetin to naringenin in living tissues under the presence of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases have been well-studied (36), the formation of these components and their interactions and correlations are difficult to speculate without further investigations.

Flavone C-glycosides displayed no variation during baking; during stir-frying, seven flavone C-glycosides showed significant decreases in abundance (Table 1). By contrast, two flavone C-glycosides, namely, 8-C-hexosyl chrysoeriol O-hexoside and hesperetin C-hexoside O-hexoside, increased significantly in the fillings during stir-frying. Moreover, 8-C-hexosyl chrysoeriol O-hexoside was only observed after stir-frying. Therefore, it is a novel degradation product that mostly originated from flavonoids. Amongst the flavones, tricin 5-O-hexosyl-O-hexoside and tricin O-hexosyl-O-syringin alcohol were novel degradation products that appeared after stir-frying. The other flavones either decreased or remained constant during stir-frying.

Variation in Other Chemicals in Blueberry Fillings During Thermal Processing

Other than flavonoids, the other chemicals in the blueberry fillings were also fully investigated by the widely targeted metabolomic analysis with UHPLC-MS/MS to obtain a comprehensive view on the variation in whole chemical compounds in blueberry filling during pastry preparation and gain further insight into the underlying mechanisms.

During thermal processing, the abundance of sucrose decreased by 32% at the stage of stir-frying, while the amount of glucose remained unchanged after stir-frying. The contents of the oxidized products of glucose, gluconic acid and glucono-1,5-lactone, increased by 52 and 123%, respectively (Table 2). However, only the variation in glucono-1,5-lactone was statistically significant. The increases in the amount of gluconic acid and glucono-1,5-lactone might be attributed to the oxidation of glucose induced by H2O2 in presence of ferrous ion (37), in which H2O2 can be produced from ascorbic acid catalyzed by Cu(II) (38).

Amongst all the 28 amino acids detected, only l-methionine, l-glutamine, and l-(+)-ornithine decreased significantly in the blueberry filling after stir-frying. Baking only affected the amount of l-glutamine. In comparison with the raw filling, baked filling showed higher levels of l-histidine, l-(+)-arginine, l-methionine, and l-glutamine. Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, which is a product of the Maillard browning reaction between xylose and amino acid/peptides, increased sharply by 667% after stir-frying (39, 40).

Fang et al. (41) found that triphosphates and diphosphates of nucleotides could be degraded into monophosphate analogs or even nucleosides during heating. This finding might explain the considerable increases in the amounts of nucleosides and their monophosphates in blueberry fillings after heating. The abundance of adenosine, adenosine 3′-monophosphate, inosine 5′-monophosphate, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, guanosine monophosphate, cytidine 5′-monophosphate, and guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate increased by 108, 354, 307, 260, 317, 123, and 2206%, respectively, after stir-frying. 2′-Deoxycytidine-5′-monophosphate appeared as a new product in the filling after stir-frying. Surprisingly, the degradation products of methylated nucleosides extensively increased; for instance, 1-methyladenosine increased by 855%, and 5-methyluridine and 1-methylxanthine were produced only after the thermal treatment of stir-frying. The results demonstrated that nucleosides and even free nucleotides would be degraded during heat treatment (41). Moreover, the thermal processing, especially at acidic conditions, might even elicit DNA degradation. Bitskinashvili et al. (42) reported that the combined thermal-acid treatment at 100°C and pH 2–4 could cause considerable degradations of maize and wheat DNA.

Amongst the seven alkaloids, only two showed significant variation after thermal processing, and both displayed increasing trends. However, three tryptamine derivatives were detected to be significantly different and showed reducing trends under the thermal treatment of stir-frying. The other components, such as organic acids, lipids, and amino acid derivatives, showed individually different variation behaviors under thermal processing (Table 2). Amongst the organic acids, only methylglutaric and d-pantothenic acids decreased in terms of abundance upon thermal treatments. Citraconic acid and 2-furoic acid occurred as new products after the thermal treatment of stir-frying. Glutaric acid, which is a degradation product that originated from sugar and lignin under heat treatment, increased by 1.3 times in the filling after stir-frying. d-Erythronolactone, which is a lactone formed by the reaction of d-xylose and calcium hydroxide (43), increased by 186 and 106%, respectively, after stir-frying and baking. Butter was incorporated into the pastry fillings and exposed to high temperature during stir-frying. Heating of butter increased its lactone content (43). As a result, the tridecalactone, which is a component in butter, was observed after stir-frying.

Conclusions

In this study, we applied a widely targeted metabolomic approach to investigate the global chemical changes during different thermal processing procedures, namely, stir-frying and baking, which were involved in the preparation of traditional blueberry filled pastry. A total of 630 chemicals were detected in blueberry fillings, and 288 were screened to be differential chemicals as samples underwent different thermal treatments. In comparison with baking, stir-frying contributed the most to the deviation of the abundance of components in blueberry fillings. Anthocyanin was the most sensitive toward thermal treatments. The other classes of phytochemicals, such as glycerophospholipids, nucleotides and their derivatives, benzoic acid derivatives, flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavone C-glycosides, hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives, and phenolamides, were also comparably sensitive toward thermal processing. The variation in the chemicals and the novel compounds that appeared after thermal processing detected by this widely targeted metabolomic analysis could provide important insights into the degradation mechanism of phytochemicals and interactions between food ingredients. However, metabolomic analysis for the total understanding of the variation in chemical features and underlying mechanisms during food preparation and corresponding reactions remains a major challenge. The currently developed metabolomic databases are mostly specific to food products, such as FooDB, which is a subset of the Human Metabolite Database (44). This database contains information about thousands of phytochemicals but lacks information on the corresponding chemical degradation products or interaction products. Additional efforts should be applied on the development of metabolomic approaches and their application in investigating food processing.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

JZ, WH, SO, and PL contributed conception and design of the study. JZ, ZW, NY, and KZ performed the experiments. JZ, ZW, and PL organized the database and performed the statistical analysis. JZ and SO wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PL and ZW revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos. 31701607 and 31972180]; the Pearl River Talent Program (No. 20170096) and the Science and Technology Planning Project (Grant No. 2018B050502008) by Guangdong Science and Technology Department, Guangdong, China; and the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization (Dalian Minzu University), Ministry of Education (No. KF2018003), China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2020.569172/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    GraceMHXiongJEspositoDEhlenfeldtMLilaMA. Simultaneous LC-MS quantification of anthocyanins and non-anthocyanin phenolics from blueberries with widely divergent profiles and biological activities. Food Chem. (2019) 227:336–46. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.101

  • 2.

    NadulskiRMaslowskiAMazurekASobczakPSzmigielskiMZukiewicz-SobczakWet al. Vitamin C and lutein content of northern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) juice processed using freezing and thawing. J Food Meas Charact. (2019) 13:2521–8. 10.1007/s11694-019-00172-x

  • 3.

    NemzerBVargasLXiaXYSintaraMFengH. Phytochemical and physical properties of blueberries, tart cherries, strawberries, and cranberries as affected by different drying methods. Food Chem. (2018) 262:242–50. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.047

  • 4.

    CesaSCarradoriSBellagambaGLocatelliMCasadeiMAMasciAet al. Evaluation of processing effects on anthocyanin content and colour modifications of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) extracts: comparison between HPLC-DAD and CIELAB analyses. Food Chem. (2017) 232:114–23. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.153

  • 5.

    KlopschRBaldermannSVossARohnSSchreinerMNeugartS. Bread enriched with legume microgreens and leaves-ontogenetic and baking-driven changes in the profile of secondary plant metabolites. Front Chem. (2018) 6:322. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00322

  • 6.

    ZhaoYWuXLYuLLChenP. Retention of polyphenols in blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) after different cooking methods, using UHPLC–DAD–MS based metabolomics. J Food Compos Anal. (2017) 56:55–66. 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.12.003

  • 7.

    HagerAHowardLRPriorRLBrownmillerC. Processing and storage effects on monomeric anthocyanins, percent polymeric color, and antioxidant capacity of processed black raspberry products. J Food Sci. (2008) 73:H134–H140. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00855.x

  • 8.

    YangNQiuRXYangSZhouKNWangCTOuSYet al. Influences of stir-frying and baking on flavonoid profile, antioxidant property, and hydroxymethylfurfural formation during preparation of blueberry-filled pastries. Food Chem. (2019) 287:167–75. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.053

  • 9.

    TeegardenMDSchwartzSJCooperstoneJL. Profiling the impact of thermal processing on black raspberry phytochemicals using untargeted metabolomics. Food Chem. (2019) 274:782–8. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.053

  • 10.

    Pérez-MíguezRSánchez-LópezEPlazaMCastro-PuyanaMMarinaML. A non-targeted metabolomic approach based on reversed-phase liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to evaluate coffee roasting process. Anal Bioanal Chem. (2018) 410:7859–70. 10.1007/s00216-018-1405-z

  • 11.

    NikolantonakiMJulienPCoelhoCRoullier-GallCBallesterJSchmitt-KopplinPet al. Impact of glutathione on wines oxidative stability: a combined sensory and metabolomic study. Front Chem. (2018) 6:182. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00182

  • 12.

    BlasiFRocchettiGMontesanoDLuciniLChiodelliGGhisoniSet al. Changes in extra-virgin olive oil added with Lycium barbarum L. carotenoids during frying: chemical analyses and metabolomic approach. Food Res Int. (2018) 105:507–16. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.061

  • 13.

    GuEJKimDWJangGJSongSHLeeJILeeSBet al. Mass-based metabolomic analysis of soybean sprouts during germination. Food Chem. (2017) 217:311–9. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.113

  • 14.

    SantosMCBLimaLRDNascimentoFRdo NascimentoTPCameronLCFerreiraMSL. Metabolomic approach for characterization of phenolic compounds in different wheat genotypes during grain development. Food Res Int. (2019) 124:118–28. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.034

  • 15.

    YuanYFZhaoYPYangJLJiangYMLuFJiaYXet al. Metabolomic analyses of banana during postharvest senescence by 1H-high resolution-NMR. Food Chem. (2017) 218:406–12. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.080

  • 16.

    BuchnerNKrumbeinARohnSKrohLW. Effect of thermal processing on the flavonols rutin and quercetin. Rapid Commun Mass Sp. (2006) 20:3229–35. 10.1002/rcm.2720

  • 17.

    HouZHQinPYZhangYCuiSHRenGX. Identification of anthocyanins isolated from black rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their degradation kinetics. Food Res Int. (2013) 50:691–7. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.037

  • 18.

    Cevallos-CasalsBACisneros-ZevallosL. Stability of anthocyanin-based aqueous extracts of Andean purple corn and red-fleshed sweet potato compared to synthetic and natural colorants. Food Chem. (2004) 86:69–77. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.08.011

  • 19.

    OrtuECaboniP. Levels of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, 2-furoic acid in sapa syrup, Marsala wine and bakery products. Int J Food Prop. (2017) 20:S2543–51. 10.1080/10942912.2017.1373668

  • 20.

    ZhangYYSongYHuXSLiaoXJNiYYLiQH. Effects of sugars in batter formula and baking conditions on 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural formation in sponge cake models. Food Res Int. (2012) 49:439–45. 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.012

  • 21.

    LouarmeLBillaudC. Evaluation of ascorbic acid and sugar degradation products during fruit dessert processing under conventional or ohmic heating treatment. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. (2012) 49:184–7. 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.12.035

  • 22.

    HouDXKaiKLiJJLinSGTeraharaNWakamatsuMet al. Anthocyanidins inhibit activator protein 1 activity and cell transformation: structure-activity relationship and molecular mechanisms. Carcinogenesis. (2003) 25:29–36. 10.1093/carcin/bgg184

  • 23.

    HouDXYanagitaTUtoTMasuzakiSFujiiM. Anthocyanidins inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 expression in LPS-evoked macrophages: structure-activity relationship and molecular mechanisms involved. Biochem Pharmacol. (2005) 70:417–25. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.05.003

  • 24.

    TanakaTTanakaTTanakaM. Potential cancer chemopreventive activity of protocatechuic acid. Int J Clin Exp Med. (2011) 3:27–33. 10.1016/j.jecm.2010.12.005

  • 25.

    TeegardenMDKnoblochTJWeghorstCMCooperstoneJLPetersonDG. Storage conditions modulate the metabolomic profile of a black raspberry nectar with minimal impact on bioactivity. Food Funct. (2018) 9:4593–601. 10.1039/C8FO00639C

  • 26.

    HussainMISyedQAKhattakMNKHafezBReigosaMJEl-KeblawyA. Natural product coumarins: biological and pharmacological perspectives. Biologia. (2019) 74:863–88. 10.2478/s11756-019-00242-x

  • 27.

    ZhaoMYLuoYHLiYLiuXWuJHLiaoXJet al. The identification of degradation products and degradation pathway of malvidin-3-glucoside and malvidin-3,5-diglucoside under microwave treatment. Food Chem. (2013) 141:3260–7. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.147

  • 28.

    SadilovaEStintzingFCCarleR. Thermal degradation of acylated and non-acylated anthocyanins. J Food Sci. (2006) 71:C504–12. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00148.x

  • 29.

    Mancilla-MargalliNALópezMG. Generation of maillard compounds from inulin during the thermal processing of Agave tequilana Weber var. Azul J Agric Food Chem. (2002) 50:806–12. 10.1021/jf0110295

  • 30.

    LourençoAGominhoJPereiraH. Chemical characterization of lignocellulosic materials by analytical pyrolysis. In: KuschP editor. Analytical Pyrolysis. London, UK: IntechOpen Limited. (2018). p. 1–22. 10.5772/intechopen.80556

  • 31.

    WongZChenKFLiJ. Formation of vanillin and syringaldehyde in an oxygen delignification process. Bioresources. (2010) 5:1509–16.

  • 32.

    ChoiMYChaiCParkJHLimJLeeJKwonSW. Effects of storage period and heat treatment on phenolic compound composition in dried Citrus peels (Chenpi) and discrimination of Chenpi with different storage periods through targeted metabolomic study using HPLC-DAD analysis. J Pharmaceut Biomed. (2011) 54:638–45. 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.09.036

  • 33.

    JeongSMKimSYKimDRJoSCNamKCet al. Effect of heat treatment on the antioxidant activity of extracts from citrus peels. J Agric Food Chem. (2004) 52:3389–93. 10.1021/jf049899k

  • 34.

    LouSNLinYSHsuYSChiuEMHoCT. Soluble and insoluble phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of immature calamondin affected by solvents and heat treatment. Food Chem. (2014) 161:246–53. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.009

  • 35.

    RakwalRAgrawalGKYonekuraMKodamaO. Naringenin 7-O-methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of the flavanone phytoalexin sakuranetin from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. (2000) 155:213–21. 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00223-5

  • 36.

    KatsumataSHamanaKHorieKToshimaHHasegawaM. Identification of sternbin and naringenin as detoxified metabolites from the rice flavanone phytoalexin sakuranetin by Pyricularia oryzae. Chem Biodivers. (2017) 14:e1600240. 10.1002/cbdv.201600240

  • 37.

    RinsantDChatelGJérômeF. Efficient and selective oxidation of D-glucose into gluconic acid under low-frequency ultrasonic irradiation. Chemcatchem. (2014) 6:3355–9. 10.1002/cctc.201402604

  • 38.

    ZhouPZhangJZhangYLiuYLiangJLiuBet al. Generation of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical resulting from oxygen-dependent oxidation of L-ascorbic acid via copper redox-catalyzed reactions. RSC Adv. (2016) 6:38541–7. 10.1039/C6RA02843H

  • 39.

    YenGCLeeTC. Mutagen formation in the reaction of maillard browning products, 2-acetylpyrrole and its analogues, with nitrite. Food Chem Toxicol. (1986) 24:1303–8. 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90062-1

  • 40.

    ZouTTKangLYangCSongHLLiuY. Flavour precursor peptide from an enzymatic beef hydrolysate Maillard reaction-II: mechanism of the synthesis of flavour compounds from a sulphur-containing peptide through a Maillard reaction. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. (2019) 110:8–18. 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.04.022

  • 41.

    FangMLIvanisevicJBentonHPJohnsonCHPattiGJHoangLTet al. Thermal degradation of small molecules: a global metabolomic investigation. Anal Chem. (2015) 87:10935–41. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03003

  • 42.

    BitskinashviliKGabriadzeIKutateladzeTVishnepolskyBMikeladzeDDatukishviliN. Effects of thermal-acid treatment on degradation and amplification of wheat and maize DNA. J Food Nutr Res. (2018) 57:242–51.

  • 43.

    MagaJA. Lactones in foods. Crit Rev Food Sci. (1976) 8:1–56. 10.1080/10408397609527216

  • 44.

    WishartDSJewisonTGuoACWilsonMKnoxCLiuYFet al. HMDB 3.0-the human metabolome database in 2013. Nucl Acids Res. (2013) 41:801–7. 10.1093/nar/gks1065

Summary

Keywords

baking, stir-frying, metabolomic analysis, chemical variation, degradation

Citation

Zheng J, Wu Z, Yang N, Zhou K, Hu W, Ou S and Liu P (2020) Widely Targeted UHPLC-MS/MS Metabolomic Analysis on the Chemical Variation in Blueberry-Filled Pastries During Processing. Front. Nutr. 7:569172. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.569172

Received

10 June 2020

Accepted

26 August 2020

Published

09 November 2020

Volume

7 - 2020

Edited by

Dejian Huang, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Reviewed by

Sui Kiat Chang, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Marcin Szymanski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Shiyi Ou ; orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-0858Pengzhan Liu ; orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-1993

This article was submitted to Food Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics