Abstract
Purpose:
Elderly patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) have a higher mortality during hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU). Elderly patients often suffer from malnutrition. On the basis of the MIMIC-III database, this study analyzed the effect of the baseline nutritional status on the death of elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization.
Materials and Methods:
Elderly patients with MODS were screened out from MIMIC-III 1.4 database. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was calculated and used to group patients into: normal nutrition (GNRI > 98) and malnutrition (GNRI ≤ 98) groups. The malnutrition group was divided into mild (92–98), moderate (82–91), and severe (≤81) groups. The differences in the baseline data and the incidence of adverse events between groups were compared. The GAM model was used to determine whether a curve relationship was present between the hospital death of elderly patients with MODS and GNRI and analyze the threshold saturation effect. The multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital deaths in different GNRI groups. The interaction test was performed to find subgroups with differences.
Results:
A total of 2456 elderly patients with MODS were enrolled. A total of 1,273 (51.8%) and 1183 (48.2%) patients were in the normal nutrition and malnutrition groups, respectively. The mortality rate of patients in the normal nutrition group during hospitalization was lower than that in the malnutrition group (206/1273 vs. 292/1183, X2 = 27.410, P < 0.001; OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48–0.72). The GAM model fitting analysis showed a threshold saturation effect at GNRI = 92. Adjusted OR values with GNRI ≥ 92 began to change to 1, and GNRI and death had no association. At GNRI < 92, high GNRI related to low risk of death. Subgroup analysis of patients with GNRI < 92 showed that the risk of death in elderly male patients was lower than that of female patients.
Conclusion:
GNRI is related to the severity of illness in elderly patients with MODS. At GNRI < 92, moderate to severe malnutrition increases the risk of death in elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization.
Introduction
With the extension of human life span, the number of elderly patients is increasing, and the number of elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) also increases (1). The mortality rate of patients in the ICU during hospitalization is significantly higher than that in the general ward (2). Elderly critically ill patients often have multiple diseases due to a variety of reasons, and their important organ functions have suffered age-related decline. Therefore, most elderly patients admitted to the ICU have multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). In many countries, the willingness of elderly patients and their families to treat is relatively weaker than that of non-elderly patients, which further causes the mortality rate of elderly critically ill patients to be significantly higher than that of non-elderly critically ill patients (3). The increase in the number of elderly critically ill patients and high mortality rate have increased the burden on the ICU and triggered discussion on the benefits of treatment of elderly patients in the ICU (1). After some elderly patients with MODS are admitted to the ICU, their conditions improve or are cured after treatment. However, many elderly patients with MODS are in their final stage of life, and significant results especially in those who suffer from malnutrition due to disease are difficult to achieve with active treatment (4).
Malnutrition has an adverse effect on the long-term prognosis of patients and has a high incidence in the elderly due to various comorbidities, strict dietary control and decreased appetite. Malnutrition is common in patients with chronic heart failure, renal failure, respiratory failure, and long-term consumption of malignant tumors (5). However, studies on the relationship between the nutritional status of elderly patients with MODS and the condition and treatment effect during hospitalization are few. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is specifically used to evaluate the nutritional status of elderly patients (6, 7). A number of studies showed that this index can predict the short- and long-term prognoses of elderly patients. Moreover, the calculation of this index only requires height, weight, and serum albumin (ALB) level, which is simple to calculate, easy to obtain, and does not increase the additional medical expenditures of patients especially critically ill patients (8).
The MIMIC database provides a large number of real-world clinical data of critically ill patients. In recent years, this database has been deeply excavated and has produced many results with clinical application value (9). The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the baseline nutritional status of elderly patients with MODS and their condition when admitted to the ICU and adverse events during hospitalization based on the MIMIC-III database.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
The subjects of this study are elderly patients with MODS admitted to the ICU recorded in the MIMIC-III database. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) age ≥ 65 years; (2) first admission to ICU (for elderly patients admitted to the ICU multiple times, only the first data are collected); (3) retention time in ICU ≥ 24 h; (4) sequential organ failure (SOFA) score ≥ 2 points and involvement of at least two organs; and (5) HR, RR, MAP, GCS, T, and SPO2 are measured at least once. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) loss of key data, such as the first SOFA and the first simplified acute physiology score I and (2) loss to follow-up. All patient-related information in the MIMIC-III database is anonymous, and no informed consent is required.
Data Source
The data of this study come from the MIMIC-III database, an open critical medicine database jointly released by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computational Physiology Laboratory, Beth Israel Dikon Medical Center, and Philips Medical under the funding of the National Institutes of Health. The latest version is the MIMIC-III v1.4. This database collects the hospitalization information of more than 50,000 patients admitted to the ICU of Beth Israel Dikang Medical Center in the United States from 2002 to 2012. Data include vital signs, medications, laboratory measurements, observations, records drawn by nursing staff, fluid balance, surgical codes, diagnostic codes, imaging reports, hospital stay, and survival data. This database has passed ethical review and obtained right for use.
Data Extraction
The PostgreSQL 10.7 software and SQL language are used to extract the following data from the MIMIC-III database: age, gender, weight, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, blood glucose, blood electrolytes (i.e., K+, Na+, and Ca2+), blood HCO3−, SOFA score, ICU hospital stay, death in the ICU, and other data. Complications (e.g., hypertension, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease); use of mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy during ICU hospitalization. All laboratory test parameters are extracted from the data generated within the first 24 h after the patient enters the ICU (i.e., baseline value) and extreme values during the ICU hospitalization period (i.e., maximum and minimum values).
Group
Groups are based on the GNRI. GNRI is calculated on the basis of height (m), weight (kg), and ALB level (g/L). The formula is: GNRI = 1.489 × ALB + 41.7 × [weight/(22 × height2)]. GNRI > 98 indicates normal nutritional status, and GNRI ≤ 98 means malnutrition (GNRI = 92–98, mild malnutrition; GNRI = 82–91, moderate malnutrition, and GNRI ≤ 81, severe malnutrition).
Outcome
The endpoint observed in this study is the mortality rate within 28 days after the patient is admitted to the ICU.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are represented by the median [quartile, median (Q1–Q3)]. The Wilcoxon rank–sum test is used to compare the two groups, and the Kruskal–Wallis test is used for comparison between groups. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages (%), and comparisons between groups are performed using the χ2-test. The generalized additive model (GAM) is used to fit the curve relationship between in-hospital death of elderly patients with MODS and GNRI, and the threshold saturation effect is analyzed. The multivariate logistic regression equation is used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital deaths among different groups. P < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant. The statistical analysis of all data is done using the EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com, version 3.4.3 R software package) software.
Results
Baseline Characteristics
After screening, 2,456 elderly critically ill patients were included (Figure 1). Patients' age ranged from 65 to 91 years old with a median age of 77 years (71, 83). A total of 1135 (46.2%) and 1321 (53.8%) patients were males and females, respectively. The GNRI of all patients was 53–170, and the median GNRI was 99 (89, 109). In accordance with GNRI, patients were preliminarily divided into normal nutrition (GNRI > 98, 1273 cases, 51.8%) and malnutrition (GNRI ≤ 98, 1183 cases, 48.2%) groups. The malnutrition group was further divided into mild (GNRI = 92–98, 444 cases), moderate (GNRI = 82–91, 480 cases), and severe (GNRI ≤ 81, 259 cases) malnutrition groups. The baseline data comparison of each group is shown in Tables 1, 2.
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient selection.
Table 1
| Characteristics | Total | GNRI > 98 | GNRI ≤98 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2,456 | 1,273 | 1,183 | |
| Age (years) | 77 (71, 83) | 76 (70, 81) | 79 (73, 84) | <0.001 |
| Male, n (%) | 1135 (46.2%) | 697 (54.8) | 624 (52.7) | 0.319 |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | 0.018 | |||
| Asian | 53 (2.16%) | 13 (1.0) | 40 (3.4) | |
| Black | 155 (6.31%) | 85 (6.7) | 70 (5.9) | |
| Hispanic | 35 (1.43%) | 17 (1.4) | 18 (1.5) | |
| White | 1790 (72.88%) | 950 (74.6) | 840 (71.0) | |
| Other | 423 (17.22%) | 208 (16.3) | 215 (18.2) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.3 (23.8, 31.5) | 30.8 (27.2, 35.2) | 24.1 (21.6, 27.0) | <0.001 |
| Hospital days | 10 (6, 17) | 9 (6, 15) | 11 (6, 19) | <0.001 |
| ICU days | 4 (2, 8) | 4 (2, 8) | 4 (2, 9) | 0.175 |
| SPO2 (%) | 98 (96, 100) | 98 (95,100) | 98 (96,100) | 0.12 |
| Heart rate (/min) | 85 (73, 100) | 87 (75, 103) | 83 (71, 97) | <0.001 |
| Respiratory rate (/min) | 18 (15, 23) | 18 (15, 23) | 19 (15, 23) | 0.017 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 78 (67, 91) | 80 (69, 93) | 75.0 (65, 89) | <0.001 |
| Temperature (°C) | 36.6 (36.0-37.1) | 36.6 (36.0, 37.1) | 36.5 (35.9, 37.1) | 0.176 |
| First Care Unit, n (%) | <0.001 | |||
| CCU | 678 (27.61%) | 402 (31.58%) | 276 (23.3%) | |
| CSRU | 349 (14.21%) | 207 (16.26%) | 142 (12%) | |
| MICU | 919 (37.42%) | 410 (32.21%) | 509 (43%) | |
| SICU | 318 (12.95%) | 163 (12.80%) | 155 (13.1%) | |
| TSICU | 192 (7.82%) | 91 (7.15%) | 101 (8.5%) | |
| Comorbidities, n(%) | ||||
| CLF | 115 (4.68%) | 63 (4.95%) | 52 (4.4%) | 0.58 |
| ALF | 105 (4.28%) | 50 (3.93%) | 55 (4.6%) | 0.433 |
| COPD | 587 (23.90%) | 295 (23.17%) | 292 (24.7%) | 0.407 |
| ARDS | 697 (28.38%) | 329 (25.84%) | 368 (31.1%) | 0.004 |
| CAD | 1195 (48.66%) | 663 (52.08%) | 532 (45%) | <0.001 |
| AKI | 949 (38.64%) | 476 (37.39%) | 473 (40%) | 0.202 |
| AHF | 323 (13.15%) | 204 (16.03%) | 119 (10.1%) | <0.001 |
| Stroke | 155 (6.31%) | 86 (6.76%) | 69 (5.8%) | 0.391 |
| CHF | 1106 (45.03%) | 565 (44.38%) | 541 (45.7%) | 0.529 |
| CRF | 384 (15.64%) | 217 (17.05%) | 167 (14.1%) | 0.052 |
| Malignancy | 201 (8.18%) | 86 (6.76%) | 115 (9.7%) | 0.009 |
| Scoring systems | ||||
| GCS | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 0.057 |
| Shock index | 0.72 (0.57, 0.89) | 0.68 (0.54, 0.84) | 0.76 (0.60, 0.93) | <0.001 |
| SOFA first day | 5 (3, 8) | 5 (3, 7) | 5 (3, 8) | <0.001 |
| APSIII first day | 49 (37, 63) | 46 (35, 60) | 52 (41, 67) | <0.001 |
Characteristics of patients in the normal nutrition and malnutrition groups.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; CCU, cardiac care unit; CSRU, cardiac surgical care unit; MICU, medical intensive care unit; SICU, surgical intensive care unit; TSICU, trauma surgical intensive care unit; CLF, chronic liver failure; ALF, acute liver failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; AKI, acute kidney injury; AHF, acute heart failure; CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; GCS, Glasgow score; SOFA, Sequential organ failure assessment; APSu, acute physiology score III.
Table 2
| Characteristics | GNRI | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤81 (n = 259) | 82–91 (n = 480) | 92–98 (n = 444) | >98 (n = 1,273) | ||
| Age (years) | 78 (73, 84) | 70 (72, 85) | 79(73, 84) | 76 (70, 81) | <0.001 |
| Male | 124 (47.9) | 256 (53.3) | 244 (55.0) | 697 (54.8) | 0.221 |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | 0.018 | ||||
| Asian | 12 (4.63%) | 12 (2.50%) | 16 (3.60%) | 13 (1.02%) | |
| Black | 16 (6.18%) | 27 (5.62%) | 27 (6.08%) | 85 (6.68%) | |
| Hispanic | 3 (1.16%) | 9 (1.88%) | 6 (1.35%) | 17 (1.34%) | |
| White | 177 (68.34%) | 344 (71.67%) | 319 (71.85%) | 950 (74.63%) | |
| Other | 51 (19.69%) | 88 (18.33%) | 76 (17.12%) | 208 (16.34%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.4 (19.3, 24.1) | 24.2 (21.7, 26.9) | 25.7 (23.0, 28.5) | 30.8 (27.2, 35.2) | <0.001 |
| First care unit | <0.001 | ||||
| CCU | 43 (16.60%) | 106 (22.08%) | 127 (28.60%) | 402 (31.58%) | |
| CSRU | 23 (8.88%) | 61 (12.71%) | 58 (13.06%) | 207 (16.26%) | |
| MICU | 127 (49.03%) | 207 (43.12%) | 175 (39.41%) | 410 (32.21%) | |
| SICU | 42 (16.22%) | 58 (12.08%) | 55 (12.39%) | 163 (12.80%) | |
| TSICU | 24 (9.27%) | 48 (10.00%) | 29 (6.53%) | 91 (7.15%) | |
| SPO2 (%) | 99 (96, 100) | 98.0 (96, 100) | 98.0 (96, 100) | 98.0 (95, 100) | 0.025 |
| Heart rate (/min) | 90.0 (79, 109) | 86.0 (75, 100) | 85.0 (72, 103) | 83.0 (71, 97) | <0.001 |
| Respiratory rate (/min) | 19.0 (15, 25) | 19 (14, 22) | 19.0 (15, 23) | 18.0 (15, 23) | 0.066 |
| Temperature (°C) | 36.4 (35.7, 37.1) | 36.5 (35.9, 37.1) | 36.6 (36.0, 37.1) | 36.6 (36.0, 37.1) | 0.118 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 110 (97, 131) | 116 (99, 134) | 119 (101, 138) | 123 (105, 141) | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 56 (47, 67) | 56 (47, 66) | 60 (50, 72) | 61 (51, 72) | <0.001 |
| MBP (mmHg) | 74 (63, 87) | 75 (64, 88) | 77 (66, 92) | 80 (69, 93) | <0.001 |
| Laboratory parameters | |||||
| ALB (g/dL) | 2.3 (1.9, 2.6) | 2.7 (2.4, 3.1) | 3.1 (2.8, 3.4) | 3.5 (3.1, 3.8) | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 27 (16.0, 42.0) | 27 (19.0, 51.8) | 27 (17.0, 49.0) | 27 (18.0, 45.0) | 0.098 |
| AST (U/L) | 39 (24.50, 63.5) | 39 (28.0, 75.0) | 39 (28.75, 77.3) | 39 (25.00, 69.0) | 0.4 |
| ALP (U/L) | 79 (68.0, 139.5) | 79 (59.0, 117.3) | 79 (63.0, 105.3) | 79 (61.0, 100.0) | <0.001 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.6 (0.40, 1.20) | 0.6 (0.40, 1.00) | 0.6 (0.50, 0.92) | 0.6 (0.50, 1.00) | 0.564 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 27 (17.0, 46.5) | 29 (19.0, 44.3) | 30 (19.0, 44.0) | 26 (18.0, 43.0) | 0.898 |
| CR (mg/dL) | 1.1 (0.70, 1.70) | 1.2 (0.90, 2.00) | 1.3 (0.90, 2.00) | 1.2 (0.90, 1.90) | 0.188 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.1 (3.70, 4.75) | 4.2 (3.70, 4.70) | 4.2 (3.80, 4.70) | 4.2 (3.80, 4.70) | 0.777 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 138 (134, 141) | 138 (135, 141) | 138 (135, 141) | 138 (135, 141) | 0.713 |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | 105 (101, 109) | 105 (100, 109) | 104 (100, 108) | 103 (99, 106) | <0.001 |
| Magnesium (mmol/L) | 1.9 (1.60, 2.20) | 1.9 (1.60, 2.20) | 1.9 (1.70, 2.20) | 2 (1.80, 2.20) | 0.149 |
| Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | 22.0 (19.0, 26.0) | 22.0 (19.0, 26.0) | 22.0 (20.0, 26.0) | 23.0 (20.0, 27.0) | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 128 (101, 157) | 132 (107, 169) | 135 (111, 182) | 142 (114, 192) | <0.001 |
| HCT (%) | 31.9 (28.0, 36.5) | 32 (28.6, 36.3) | 33.35 (29.7, 37.0) | 34.6 (30.4, 38.5) | <0.001 |
| HGB (g/dL) | 10.3 (9.2, 12.1) | 10.7 (9.5, 12.0) | 11.2 (9.8, 12.5) | 11.6 (10.2, 13.0) | <0.001 |
| Platelet (1,000/mm3) | 225 (138, 317) | 215 (144, 304) | 210 (156, 281) | 216 (160, 282) | 0.111 |
| PT (second) | 14.7 (13.6, 16.9) | 14.3 (13.3, 16.5) | 14.3 (13.3, 16.8) | 14.3 (13.1, 16.7) | 0.8 |
| APTT (second) | 33.9 (29.4, 43.1) | 32.3 (27.4, 42.1) | 32.3 (28.0, 41.8) | 32 (26.6, 43.1) | 0.92 |
| INR | 1.3 (1.20, 1.70) | 1.3 (1.20, 1.60) | 1.3 (1.20, 1.60) | 1.3 (1.10, 1.60) | 0.712 |
| WBC (109/L) | 12.9 (8.6, 17.9) | 11.9 (8.2, 16.4) | 12 (8.4, 15.7) | 10.9 (7.8, 15.6) | 0.558 |
| Comorbidities, n(%) | |||||
| CLF | 14 (5.41%) | 23 (4.79%) | 15 (3.38%) | 63 (4.95%) | 0.53 |
| ALF | 14 (5.41%) | 25 (5.21%) | 16 (3.60%) | 50 (3.93%) | 0.441 |
| COPD | 71 (27.41%) | 117 (24.38%) | 104 (23.42%) | 295 (23.17%) | 0.524 |
| ARDS | 97 (37.45%) | 149 (31.04%) | 122 (27.48%) | 329 (25.84%) | <0.001 |
| CAD | 96 (37.07%) | 216 (45.00%) | 220 (49.55%) | 663 (52.08%) | <0.001 |
| AKI | 99 (38.22%) | 190 (39.58%) | 184 (41.44%) | 476 (37.39%) | 0.474 |
| AHF | 19 (7.34%) | 45 (9.38%) | 55 (12.39%) | 204 (16.03%) | <0.001 |
| Stroke | 9 (3.47%) | 27 (5.62%) | 33 (7.43%) | 86 (6.76%) | 0.153 |
| CHF | 105 (40.54%) | 218 (45.42%) | 218 (49.10%) | 565 (44.38%) | 0.15 |
| CRF | 21 (8.11%) | 77 (16.04%) | 69 (15.54%) | 217 (17.05%) | 0.004 |
| Malignancy | 31 (11.97%) | 51 (10.62%) | 33 (7.43%) | 86 (6.76%) | 0.006 |
| Scoring systems | |||||
| GCS | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 15(15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 0.123 |
| Shock index | 0.8 (0.7, 1.0) | 0.8 (0.6, 0.9) | 0.8 (0.6–0.9) | 0.7 (0.5, 0.8) | <0.001 |
| SOFA first day | 6 (4, 8) | 5 (3, 8) | 5 (3, 7) | 5 (3, 7) | <0.001 |
| APSIII first day | 60 (48, 74) | 53 (41, 66) | 48 (38, 61) | 46 (35, 60) | <0.001 |
Characteristics of patients in subgroups with different GNRIs.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; CCU, cardiac care unit; CSRU, cardiac surgical care unit; MICU, medical intensive care unit; SICU, surgical intensive care unit; TSICU, trauma surgical intensive care unit; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, a lkaline phosphatase; CR, creatine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; WBC, white blood cell; INR, international normalized ratio; CLF, chronic liver failure; ALF, acute liver failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; AKI, acute kidney injury; AHF, acute heart failure; CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; GCS, Glasgow score; SOFA, Sequential organ failure assessment; APSu, acute physiology score III.
Relationship Between Baseline Nutritional Status and Illness Severity
Among all patients, 1,875 had acute kidney injury, and all patients had sepsis. A total of 2042 (83.1%) patients had a GCS score of 15, a shock index of 0.26–2.94 with a median of 0.72 (0.57, 0.89), and SOFA score of 2–21 with a median of 5 (3, 8). A total of 1496 patients received mechanical ventilation, and 127 patients received CRRT. The comparison between each group is shown in Tables 3, 4.
Table 3
| Indicators | GNRI > 98 (n = 1,273) | GNRI ≤98 (n = 1,183) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKI | 999 (78.5) | 876 (74.0) | 0.010 |
| SEPSIS | 1273 (100.0) | 1183 (100.0) | 1.000 |
| GCS | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | <0.001 |
| SI | 0.68 (0.54, 0.84) | 0.76 (0.60, 0.93) | <0.001 |
| SOFA | 5 (3, 7) | 5 (3, 8) | <0.001 |
| CRRT | 70 (5.5) | 56 (4.7) | 0.391 |
| Ventilation | 789 (62.0) | 706 (59.7) | 0.243 |
Comparison of the conditions of patients in the normal and malnutrition groups.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; AKI, acute kidney injury; GCS, Glasgow score; SI, shock index; SOFA, Sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.
Table 4
| Characteristics | GNRI | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >98 (n = 1,273) | 92–98 (n = 444) | 82–91 (n = 480) | ≤81 (n = 259) | ||
| AKI | 999 (78.5) | 332 (74.8) | 354 (73.8) | 190 (73.4) | 0.076 |
| SEPSIS | 1273 (100.0) | 444 (100.0) | 480 (100.0) | 259 (100.0) | 1.000 |
| GCS | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 15 (15, 15) | 0.582 |
| SI | 0.68 (0.54, 0.84) | 0.75 (0.58, 0.91) | 0.75 (0.61, 0.92) | 0.81 (0.66, 0.99) | <0.001 |
| SOFA | 5 (3, 7) | 5 (3, 7) | 5 (3, 8) | 6 (4, 8) | <0.001 |
| CRRT | 70 (5.5) | 21 (4.7) | 22 (4.6) | 13 (5.0) | 0.849 |
| Ventilation | 789 (62.0) | 248 (55.9) | 288 (60.0) | 170 (65.6) | 0.047 |
Comparison of important indicators among the four subgroups.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; AKI, acute kidney injury; GCS, Glasgow score; SI, shock index; SOFA, Sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.
Hospital Outcome
Among all patients, 498 died during hospitalization. The median length of hospitalization was 10 (6, 17) days, and the median length of ICU hospitalization was 4 (2, 8) days. The mortality, length of stay in hospital, and ICU stay in the normal nutrition group were lower than those in the malnutrition group (Table 5). Subgroup analysis showed differences in mortality during hospitalization and ICU stay time between groups, but no statistical difference in hospitalization time was observed (Table 6).
Table 5
| Indicators | GNRI > 98 (n = 1,273) | GNRI ≤98 (n = 1,183) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital death | 206 (16.2) | 292 (24.7) | <0.001 |
| Hospital duration | 9 (6, 15) | 11 (6, 19) | <0.001 |
| ICU duration | 4 (2, 8) | 4 (2, 9) | <0.001 |
Comparison of hospitalization outcomes and prognosis of patients in malnutrition and normal nutrition groups.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; ICU, intensive care unit.
Table 6
| Characteristics | GNRI | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >98 (n = 1,273) | 92–98 (n = 444) | 82–91 (n = 480) | ≤81 (n = 259) | ||
| Hospital death | 206 (16.2) | 89 (20.1) | 115 (24.0) | 88 (34.0) | <0.001 |
| Hospital duration | 9 (6, 16) | 10 (6, 17) | 10.0 (6.4–17.8) | 12.9 (7.6–22.5) | <0.001 |
| ICU duration | 4 (2, 8) | 4 (2, 8) | 4(2, 8) | 5 (2, 11) | 0.354 |
Comparison of hospitalization outcomes and prognosis of patients with different nutritional status.
GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; ICU, intensive care unit.
Relationship Between GNRI and Death During Hospitalization of Elderly Critically Ill Patients
A total of 206 (16.2%) and 292 (24.7%) patients died during hospitalization in the normal nutrition and malnutrition groups, respectively. Malnutrition significantly increased the mortality risk of elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.39–2.07). After adjusting for confounding factors, a curve fitting equation was made for death during hospitalization and GNRI by using the GAM model. A non-linear relationship between death during hospitalization and GNRI was observed, and the slope changed significantly, which might have a threshold saturation effect (Figure 2). The threshold effect analysis was applied to find the inflection point, and changes in OR between the two groups before and after the inflection point were compared. Further analysis showed a threshold saturation effect when GNRI = 92, that is, as the GNRI increased to 92, a group of adjusted OR values with GNRI ≥ 92 began to change to 1. No correlation was observed between death during hospitalization and GNRI.
Figure 2
Relationship between GNRI and death during hospitalization. The curve fitting equations of death (Y) and GNRI (X) during hospitalization are used. A non-linear relationship is observed between Y and X, and the slope changes evidently, which may have a threshold saturation effect.
Compared with patients with GNRI ≥ 92, moderate to severe malnutrition (GNRI < 92) further increased the mortality of elderly severely ill patients during hospitalization (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49–2.24, P < 0.001; Table 7). According to the tangent point value of 92, the curve fitting equation was performed again, and the slopes of the two equations before and after the tangent point were evidently different (Figure 3). A total of 739 patients with GNRI < 92 were extracted, and the multiple regression equation was applied. The adjusted OR and interval were 0.94 (0.92, 0.97), indicating that GNRI was a protective factor for severe patients with GNRI < 92. Moreover, the moderate-risk group (82–91) had a lower rate of death than the high-risk group (<82). Thus, a large GNRI resulted in low risk of death (Table 8). A further subgroup analysis was performed on 739 elderly patients with GNRI < 92 to verify the consistency of the relationship between death during hospitalization and GNRI. Except gender, all other variables had no interaction (P for interaction > 0.05). In the results of gender stratification, the risk of death for older men was lower than that for older women (Figure 4).
Table 7
| Non-adjusted | Adjust model-I | Adjust model-II | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | P | OR | P | OR | P | |
| Total | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | <0.0001 | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | 0.0002 | 0.98 (0.97, 1.00) | 0.0092 |
| GNRI < 92 | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | <0.0001 | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | <0.0001 | 0.94 (0.92, 0.97) | <0.0001 |
| GNRI ≥ 92 | 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) | 0.0131 | 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) | 0.085 | 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.5532 |
Threshold effect analysis of GNRI on in-hospital mortality.
Adjust model-I: age and gender.
Adjust model-II: age, gender, ethnicity, SPO2, HR, RR, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, BUN, bicarbonate, glucose, potassium, creatinine, CLF, COPD, ARDS, AKI, STROKE, and malignancy.
Figure 3
Relationship between GNRI and death during hospitalization. In accordance with the GNRI cutoff of 92, the curve fitting equation is performed again. Evident differences can be observed in the slopes of the two equations before and after the cutoff value.
Table 8
| GNRI | N | Non-adjusted OR | P | Adjust-I OR | P | Adjust-II OR | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 739 | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | <0.0001 | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | <0.0001 | 0.94 (0.92, 0.97) | <0.0001 |
| ≤81 | 259 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | |||
| 82–91 | 480 | 0.61 (0.44, 0.85) | 0.0037 | 0.60 (0.43, 0.84) | 0.0027 | 0.62 (0.42, 0.91) | 0.0146 |
Association between in-hospital mortality and GNRI (<92) observed using the multivariate logistic regression model.
Adjust model-I: age and gender.
Adjust model-II: age, gender, ethnicity, SPO2, heart rate, SYSBP, DIASBP, resp rate, ALT, AST, BUN, bicarbonate, sodium, chloride, potassium, creatinine, COPD, ARDS, AKI, STROKE, and CLF.
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis of patients with GNRI < 92. A further subgroup analysis of 739 elderly patients with GNRI < 92 is performed to verify the consistency of the relationship between Y and X. Except gender, all other variables have no interaction (P for interaction > 0.05). In the results of gender stratification, the risk of death for older men is lower than that for older women.
Discussion
This study found through multiple analyses that GNRI, which reflects the nutritional status of elderly patients, is closely related to the outcome of elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization. The univariate analysis showed that malnutrition (GNRI ≤ 98) significantly increases the risk of death during hospitalization in elderly patients with MODS (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.39–2.07, P < 0.001). Further univariate analysis showed that moderate to severe malnutrition further increases the risk of death in elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49–2.24, P < 0.001). For patients with MODS with GNRI < 92, GNRI is the protective factor, that is, a high GNRI results in low risk of death. Further subgroup analysis of 739 elderly patients with GNRI < 92 shows that the risk of death in elderly men is lower than that in elderly women. The results of this study suggest that mild malnutrition has no significant effect on the mortality risk of elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization, but elderly patients with MODS and moderate to severe malnutrition have high risk of death during hospitalization, and it is reasonable for patients to be evaluated upon admission to the ICU. The nutritional status of the baseline level is helpful in judging the treatment effect during hospitalization and suggests the necessity of nutritional support for elderly patients with MODS. The goal of nutritional support may be GNRI > 99, but accurate conclusions need further confirmation by prospective interventional studies.
At present, many countries enter an aging society, and the definition of old age has been raised from 60 to 65 years old. The number of elderly people (≥80 years old) increases significantly, leading to a continuous increase in the number of elderly patients admitted to ICUs (10). Elderly patients with MODS often have a variety of underlying diseases, and declining organ function with age, relatively weak physique, and weakened ability to compensate for severe diseases (11). When critically ill, the patient should be admitted to the ICU for monitoring and treatment. A considerable number of patients are at the end of their lives. Active invasive treatment (such as mechanical ventilation and various catheterization) cannot change the short-term outcome (12) and increases the suffering of patients and the financial burden of the family. At the same time, medical resources are becoming scarce. Thus, some critically ill patients with high therapeutic needs cannot get timely intensive care treatment (13). Therefore, the current medical field is gradually paying attention to research on the hospitalization outcome of elderly critically ill patients (14). Guidet et al. tried to reduce the 6-month mortality rate of elderly critically ill patients by promoting the admission of elderly critically ill patients to the ICU. Results found that increasing the admission of elderly patients to the ICU does not reduce the 6-month mortality rate, suggesting that increased intensive care treatment cannot improve the overall short-term prognosis of elderly critically ill patients (15). In terms of medical expenses, the study found that elderly and critically ill patients need medical resources, and the corresponding expenditures are significantly higher than those of other patients in other age groups. The mortality rate during hospitalization is highest in very elderly patients with severe illness followed by middle elderly patients (65–80 years) and lowest in patients under 65 years of age (16). Therefore, effective evaluation methods are needed to predict the death risk of elderly critically ill patients during hospitalization to provide relevant information to patients, family members, and doctors for deciding whether to admit patients into the ICU. Demiselle et al. analyzed the clinical data of 501 elderly critically ill patients and found that 108 (21.6%) patients died during hospitalization. Factors related to death during hospitalization include high acute illness scores, ICU admission diagnosis (including cardiac resuscitation, anxiety, and worry about the deterioration of the quality of life in patients' agents), and staying in the chronic disease management institution before entering the ICU (17). For very elderly patients (≥90 years), mechanical ventilation is a predictor of death during ICU hospitalization but not age (18). These studies are aimed at the entire group of elderly patients with severe illness, and few similar studies are aimed at elderly patients with MODS.
Nutrition plays an important role in the normal physiological functions of the human body and treatment of diseases especially in elderly patients (19, 20). Currently, a variety of nutritional status evaluation tools, including Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill, GNRI, are available (21–23). Among these tools, GNRI is a scoring tool specific for elderly patients. Clinical studies found that GNRI can predict the short-term prognosis of critically ill patients, such as those with heart failure, respiratory failure, and sepsis (6, 24, 25), and the long-term prognosis of patients with cancer (8). These studies showed that GNRI has a certain relationship with the prognosis of severely ill elderly patients, but most studies have small samples. Given the diversity of critically ill patients, prospective controlled studies are difficult to carry out. The MIMIC database provides a large amount of real-world data on elderly critically ill patients (26). After screening, the data of 2,456 elderly patients with MODS are included, and the sample size of our study has increased significantly compared with those in other studies. The analysis results further prove that GNRI can effectively predict the death risk of elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization. Nutritional status often reflects the actual situation of the body's intake of nutrients for a period. The intake and absorption of nutrients are related to many factors, including the patient's basic diseases, living habits, and treatment (27). Malnutrition often indicates that the patient is in an unoptimistic situation. When the disease progresses to a critical illness with MODS, the risk of death is significantly increased (28, 29). Therefore, based on previous research and our results, we believe that for elderly patients with MODS, the baseline GNRI can be calculated before admission to the ICU, and the short-term prognosis of the patients can be comprehensively evaluated on the basis of GNRI, thereby providing valuable information for further decision-making.
This study has certain limitations. The main reason is that the data of this study come from the MIMIC database. Even with its large inventory sample size, this study remains a retrospective analysis. As a result, some cases may be eliminated due to incomplete data. At the same time, some useful indicators are not tested or entered, which may affect the results of the analysis. Another limitation is that multivariate logistic regression equation was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital deaths among different groups, but the real-world data may not be linear. For a reliable evidence, further multicenter registration studies, especially prospective cohort studies, are still needed.
Conclusion
GNRI is related to the severity of illness in elderly patients with MODS. When GNRI < 92, moderate to severe malnutrition increases the risk of death in elderly patients with MODS during hospitalization. In clinical practice, whether elderly patients with MODS have malnutrition should be determined. For patients with malnutrition, reasonable supplementary nutrition should be given to avoid poor prognosis due to malnutrition.
Funding
This study was supported by Medical Innovation Research (18CXZ026) and Medical Comprehensive Program (20BJZ27). The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was not obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
FZ contributed to the study initial design. ZM and TW performed the statistical analysis. XL, JC, PH, CL, HL, HK, and ZZ contributed to the data collection and data cleansing. ZM made the charts and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
AngusDC. Admitting elderly patients to the intensive care Unit-Is it the right decision?JAMA. (2017) 318:1443–4. 10.1001/jama.2017.14535
2.
AwadABader-El-DenMMcNicholasJBriggsJ. Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach. Int J Med Inform. (2017) 108:185–95. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002
3.
ReyesJCAlonsoJVFonsecaJSantosMLJimenezMLBraniffJ. Characteristics and mortality of elderly patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a district hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med. (2016) 20:391–7. 10.4103/0972-5229.186219
4.
ShpataVOhriINurkaTPrendushiX. The prevalence and consequences of malnutrition risk in elderly Albanian intensive care unit patients. Clin Interv Aging. (2015) 10:481–6. 10.2147/CIA.S77042
5.
CorishCABardonLA. Malnutrition in older adults: Screening and determinants. Proc Nutr Soc. (2019) 78:372–9. 10.1017/S0029665118002628
6.
LiHCenKSunWFengB. Prognostic value of geriatric nutritional risk index in elderly patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2021) 33:1477–86. 10.1007/s40520-020-01656-3
7.
WeiLXieHLiJLiRChenWHuangLet al. The prognostic value of geriatric nutritional risk index in elderly patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study. Medicine. (2020) 99:e22217. 10.1097/MD.0000000000022217
8.
LidorikiISchizasDFrountzasMMachairasNProdromidouAKapelouzouAet al. GNRI as a prognostic factor for outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Nutr Cancer. (2021) 73:391–403. 10.1080/01635581.2020.1756350
9.
ChenHZhuZZhaoCGuoYChenDWeiYet al. Central venous pressure measurement is associated with improved outcomes in septic patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Crit Care. (2020) 24:433. 10.1186/s13054-020-03109-9
10.
Chin-YeeND'EgidioGThavornKHeylandDKyeremantengK. Cost analysis of the very elderly admitted to intensive care units. Crit Care. (2017) 21:109. 10.1186/s13054-017-1689-y
11.
BagshawSMWebbSADelaneyAGeorgeCPilcherDHartGKet al. Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre cohort analysis. Crit Care. (2009) 13:R45. 10.1186/cc7768
12.
NguyenYLAngusDCBoumendilAGuidetB. The challenge of admitting the very elderly to intensive care. Ann Intensive Care. (2011) 1:29. 10.1186/2110-5820-1-29
13.
FlaattenHde LangeDWArtigasABinDMorenoRChristensenSet al. The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43:1319–28. 10.1007/s00134-017-4718-z
14.
LeblancGBoumendilAGuidetB. Ten things to know about critically ill elderly patients. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43:217–9. 10.1007/s00134-016-4477-2
15.
GuidetBLeblancGSimonTWoimantMQuenotJPGanansiaOet al. Effect of systematic intensive care unit triage on long-term mortality among critically ill elderly patients in france: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2017) 318:1450–9. 10.1001/jama.2017.13889
16.
HaasLvan BeusekomIvan DijkDHamakerMEBakhshi-RaiezFde LangeDWet al. Healthcare-related costs in very elderly intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. (2018) 44:1896–903. 10.1007/s00134-018-5381-8
17.
DemiselleJDuvalGHamelJFRenaultABodet-ContentinLMartin-LefevreLet al. Determinants of hospital and one-year mortality among older patients admitted to intensive care units: Results from the multicentric SENIOREA cohort. Ann Intensive Care. (2021) 11:35. 10.1186/s13613-021-00804-w
18.
Le BorgnePMaestraggiQCouraudSLefebvreFHerbrechtJEBoivinAet al. Critically ill elderly patients (>/= 90 years): Clinical characteristics, outcome and financial implications. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e198360. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198360
19.
MastronuzziTGrattaglianoI. Nutrition as a health determinant in elderly patients. Curr Med Chem. (2019) 26:3652–61. 10.2174/0929867324666170523125806
20.
BarkoukisH. Nutrition recommendations in elderly and aging. Med Clin North Am. (2016) 100:1237–50. 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.006
21.
CorujaMKCobalchiniYWentzelCFinkJ. Nutrition risk screening in intensive care units: agreement between NUTRIC and NRS 2002 tools. Nutr Clin Pract. (2020) 35:567–71. 10.1002/ncp.10419
22.
KondrupJ. Nutrition risk screening in the ICU. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. (2019) 22:159–61. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000551
23.
LeeJSJeongKYKoSH. Usefulness of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to predict the severity of cholecystitis among older patients in the emergency department. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2020) 20:455–60. 10.1111/ggi.13900
24.
YenibertizDCirikMO. The comparison of GNRI and other nutritional indexes on short-term survival in geriatric patients treated for respiratory failure. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2021) 33:611–7. 10.1007/s40520-020-01740-8
25.
LeeJSChoiHSKoYGYunDH. Performance of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in predicting 28-day hospital mortality in older adult patients with sepsis. Clin Nutr. (2013) 32:843–8. 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.01.007
26.
ZhangYZhengQDaiXXuXMaL. Overweight is associated with better one-year survival in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database. J Thorac Dis. (2021) 13:562–74. 10.21037/jtd-20-2824
27.
WellsJCSawayaALWibaekRMwangomeMPoullasMSYajnikCSet al. The double burden of malnutrition: Aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet. (2020) 395:75–88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32472-9
28.
SchneiderSMCorreiaM. Epidemiology of weight loss, malnutrition and sarcopenia: A transatlantic view. Nutrition. (2020) 69:110581. 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110581
29.
LeivaBEBadiaTMVirgiliCNElguezabalSGFazMCHerreroMIet al. Hospital malnutrition screening at admission: Malnutrition increases mortality and length of stay. Nutr Hosp. (2017) 34:907–13. 10.20960/nh.657
Summary
Keywords
elderly, geriatric nutritional risk index, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, intensive care unit, MIMIC-III
Citation
Mao Z, Wen T, Liu X, Chen J, Hu P, Liu C, Liu H, Kang H, Zhang Z and Zhou F (2022) Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is Associated with Hospital Death in Elderly Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Retrospective Study Based on the MIMIC-III Database. Front. Nutr. 9:834256. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.834256
Received
13 December 2021
Accepted
21 March 2022
Published
03 June 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Nada Rotovnik Kozjek, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
Reviewed by
Zhongheng Zhang, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, China; Jun Lyu, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Mao, Wen, Liu, Chen, Hu, Liu, Liu, Kang, Zhang and Zhou.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Feihu Zhou feihuzhou301@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Clinical Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.