Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1371702
This article is part of the Research Topic Physiological Growth Responses to Light in Controlled Environment Agriculture View all 10 articles

Supplemental greenhouse lighting increased the water use efficiency, crop growth, and cutting production in Cannabis sativa

Provisionally accepted
Cristian E. Collado Cristian E. Collado 1Seung Jae Hwang Seung Jae Hwang 2Ricardo Hernandez Ricardo Hernandez 1*
  • 1 Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 2 Other, Jiju, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The expanding cannabis production sector faces economic challenges, intensified by freshwater scarcity in the main US production areas. Greenhouse cultivation harnesses sunlight to reduce production costs, yet the impact of greenhouse light levels on crucial production components, such as plant growth, branching, and water use efficiency (WUE), remains poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the effects of combined sunlight and supplemental lighting on the crop’s main production components and leaf gas exchange of Cannabis sativa ‘Suver Haze’ in the vegetative stage. Within a greenhouse, LED lighting provided at intensities of ~150, 300, 500, and 700 µmol m-2 s-1 (18-hour photoperiod), combined with solar radiation, resulted in average daily light integrals of 17.9, 29.8, 39.5, and 51.8 mol m-2 d-1. Increasing light levels linearly increased biomass, leaf area, and the number of branches per plant and square meter, with respective rates of 0.26 g, 32.5 cm2, and 0.41 branches per mole of additional light. As anticipated, crop evapotranspiration increased by 1.8-fold with the increase in light intensity yet crop WUE improved by 1.6-fold when comparing the lowest and highest light treatments. Moreover, water requirements per unit of plant biomass decreased from 0.37 to 0.24 liters per gram when lighting increased from ~18 to 52 mol m-2 d-1, marking a 35 % reduction in evapotranspiration. These results were supported by increments in leaf photosynthesis and WUE with light enhancement. Furthermore, our findings indicate that even 52 mol m-2 d-1 of supplemental lighting did not saturate any of the crop responses to light and can be economically viable for cannabis nurseries. In conclusion, light supplementation strongly enhanced photosynthesis and plant growth while increasing WUE. Additionally, a comprehensive discussion highlights the shared physiological mechanisms governing WUE in diverse plant species and their potential for water conservation under enhanced lighting conditions.

    Keywords: HEMP, stock plant, propagation, Water Management, Water reduction, crop yield, PPFD, DLI

    Received: 16 Jan 2024; Accepted: 06 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Collado, Hwang and Hernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ricardo Hernandez, Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695-7609, North Carolina, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.