Impact Factor 4.106 | CiteScore 4.47
More on impact ›

in Plant Science

Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Crop and Product Physiology

Functional Plant Ecology

Marine and Freshwater Plants

Plant Abiotic Stress

Plant Biophysics and Modeling

Plant Biotechnology

Plant Breeding

Plant Cell Biology

Plant Development and EvoDevo

Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

Plant Microbe Interactions

Plant Nutrition

Plant Physiology

Plant Proteomics

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology

Plant Traffic and Transport

Technical Advances in Plant Science

Virology

Scope

Plant Physiology welcomes contributions that extend studies of molecules, cells, tissues, and organs to the whole-plant level — providing insight into plants’ functions, and their interactions with the environment.

World-class research. Ultimate impact.

Congratulations to our authors, reviewers and editors for accelerating new knowledge and solutions – and helping everyone to live great lives on a healthy planet.

Editorial Board

Scope

Physiology studies the organism as a whole, with the aim of determining how each constituent (e.g. the independent tissues) contributes to its functions and interactions with the environment. Section Plant Physiology welcomes contributions that extend studies of molecules, cells, tissues, and organs to the whole-plant level.
The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers an outstanding alternative to traditional publication formats. Plant Physiology has assembled a team of internationally renowned scientists, from across a wide spectrum of expertise, who will strive to make this one of the best publishing venues in the field of plant sciences. Frontiers articles are published fast; they will be online within ~12 weeks after the submission date. The peer-review process has been completely revised and adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance.

Please consider the requirements for experimental studies as listed below

Quantitative analysis need to be performed on a minimum number of 3 biological replicates in order to enable an assessment of significance. This includes quantitative omics studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) as well as phenotypic measurements, quantitative assays, and qPCR expression analysis. Studies that do not comply with these replication requirements will not be considered for review.

Studies falling into the categories below will not be considered for review, unless they are expanded and provide insight into the biological system or process being studied:

i) Descriptive collection of transcripts, proteins or metabolites, including comparative sets as a result of different conditions or treatments;
ii) Descriptive studies that define gene families using basic phylogenetics and the assignment of cursory functional attributions (e.g. expression profiles, hormone or metabolites levels, promoter analysis, informatic parameters).

Studies using transgenic or mutant lines (plants and algae) should be based on data from multiple independent alleles (at least 2) displaying a common and stable phenotype. Examples include, T-DNA, transposon, RNAi, CRISPR/Cas9, chemically induced, overexpressors, reporter fusions (GUS, FPs, LUC) etc. Qualitative data can be presented from a single allele but should be indicative of observations from multiple alleles which should be explicitly stated in the text. Quantitative data should be derived from multiple alleles (at least 2) and should be displayed separately for each allele (with at least 3 independent replications for each allele). Studies reporting single alleles may be considered acceptable when:

i) Complementation via transformation is used for confirmation;
ii) The allele has been previously characterized and published and is representative of multiple independent lines;
iii) Systems where genetic transformation is difficult or not yet possible, alternative evidence should be presented supporting the reported allele.

Facts

Indexed in: PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, DOAJ, CrossRef, AGRICOLA

PMCID: all published articles receive a PMCID

Submission

Plant Physiology welcomes submissions of the following article types: Correction, Editorial, Hypothesis and Theory, Methods, Mini Review, Opinion, Original Research, Perspective, Review and Systematic Review.

All manuscripts must be submitted directly to the section Plant Physiology, where they are peer-reviewed by the Associate and Review Editors of the specialty section.

Articles published in the section Plant Physiology will benefit from the Frontiers impact and tiering system after online publication. Authors of published original research with the highest impact, as judged democratically by the readers, will be invited by the Chief Editor to write a Frontiers Focused Review - a tier-climbing article. This is referred to as "democratic tiering". The author selection is based on article impact analytics of original research published in all Frontiers specialty journals and sections. Focused Reviews are centered on the original discovery, place it into a broader context, and aim to address the wider community across all of Plant Science.

Frontiers Support
Tel +41(0)21 510 17 10
Fax +41 (0)21 510 17 01
support@frontiersin.org

in Plant Science

Articles

Scope

World-class research. Ultimate impact.

Editorial Board

This section has no chief editors.

Research Topics

Scope

Facts

Submission

Open Access Statement

Copyright Statement

Quality

Contact

There are no results to display.

This section has no articles.

There are no articles to display. Please try changing the filters.

Contact Editorial Office

Login using

You can login by using one of your existing accounts.

Scope

World-class research. Ultimate impact.

This section has no chief editors.

There are no results to display.

This section has no articles.

There are no articles to display. Please try changing the filters.

Contact Editorial Office