Impact Factor 2.323

The 1st most cited journal in Multidisciplinary Psychology

This article is part of the Research Topic

The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories

General Commentary ARTICLE

Front. Psychol., 12 April 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00218

Erratum: Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation

  • Frontiers, Lausanne, Switzerland

A correction on
Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation

by Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., and Marriott, M. (2013). Front. Psychol. 4:73. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.0007

A correction implemented in the PDF file of the article was missed out in the HTML. Hence the PDF and full text HTML versions do not correspond. Under the heading Survey responses “scammed” (1) the following sentence: The notion of “scamming” took center-stage in the blogosphere's response to LOG12, although not all comments went so far as to suggest “… there are no ‘Human Subjects4.’ ” should read “The notion of ‘scamming’ took center-stage in the blogosphere's response to LOG12.” and footnote 4 should have been removed.

Citation: Frontiers in Psychology Editorial Office (2013) Erratum: Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Front. Psychol. 4:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00218

Received: 08 April 2013; Accepted: 08 April 2013;
Published online: 12 April 2013.

Edited by:

Viren Swami, University of Westminster, UK

Copyright © 2013 Frontiers in Psychology Editorial Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

*Correspondence: psychology.editorial.office@frontiersin.org