Original Research ARTICLE
Predictors of mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security in at-risk families
- Università degli Studi di Trento, Rovereto, Italy
Child healthy development is largely influenced by parent–child interaction and a secure parent–child attachment is predictively associated with positive outcomes in numerous domains of child development. However, the parent–child relationship can be affected by several psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors that undermine its quality and in turn play a negative role in short and long term child psychological health. Prevention and intervention programs that support parenting skills in at-risk families can efficiently reduce the impact of risk factors on mother and child psychological health. This study examines predictors of mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security in a sample of first-time mothers with psychosocial and/or socio-demographic risk factors. Forty primiparous women satisfying specific risk criteria participated in a longitudinal study with their children from pregnancy until 18 month of child age. A multiple psychological and socioeconomic assessment was performed. The Emotional Availability Scales were used to measure the quality of emotional exchanges between mother and child at 12 months and the Attachment Q-Sort served as a measure of child attachment security at 18 months. Results highlight both the effect of specific single factors, considered at a continuous level, and the cumulative risk effect of different co-occurring factors, considered at binary level, on mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security. Implication for the selection of inclusion criteria of intervention programs that support parenting skills in at-risk families are discussed.
Child physical and psychological development is largely influenced by parent–child relationship (Bornstein, 2002). Through their caregiving, parents supply their children with the experiences and support they need for achieving their developmental milestones (Brinker et al., 1994). An extensive body of research on human parenting has provided evidence that quality of caregiving is essential in determining the level of children’s social emotional as well as cognitive development (Bornstein and Tamis-LeMonda, 1989; Landry et al., 2006; Dexter et al., 2013). Specifically, sensitive and responsive parenting promotes a secure attachment relationship (De Wolff and van IJzendoorn, 1997; Nievar and Becker, 2008), which in turn is predictively associated with positive outcomes in numerous domains of child development (Bar-Haim et al., 2000; Vondra et al., 2001; Belsky and Pasco Fearon, 2002; Bernier and Meins, 2008; Dexter et al., 2013). However, the parent–child relationship can be affected by several psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors that undermine its quality and in turn play a negative role in short and long term child psychological wellbeing (Sameroff, 1998, 2000; Choe et al., 2013). Classical research on the psychological development of children living in at risk families supports additive models according to which psychological problems are not the result of one specific risk factor but may be instead predicted by the combined presence of different factors (Greenberg et al., 1993; Lyons-Ruth et al., 1993; Hubbs-Tait et al., 1996). Also, established models of parenting (Belsky, 1984) postulate that the quality of the parent–child relationship is the integrated result of three sets of factors: parent characteristics, infant characteristics, and context which can influence parenting in a supportive or stressful way. Accordingly, many studies have investigated to which extent attachment security can be explained by theoretically relevant risk factors, such as low family socio-economic status (SES), maternal depression and other psychological symptoms, young maternal age, single parenting. However, most studies concentrated on one specific risk factor at the time, or several co-occurring factors that could not be disentangled. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence on dyadic emotional availability (EA; Biringen and Robinson, 1991; Biringen, 2000), as an index of mother–child interaction quality, and on child attachment security of different psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors in at-risk families living in Northern Italy. Results in this direction may guide the selection of inclusion criteria for effective intervention programs that promote sensitive and responsive parenting in at-risk families.
Attachment Security and Emotional Availability
Secure attachment has been shown to positively influence child social emotional as well as cognitive adaptation beyond infancy (Bar-Haim et al., 2000; Vondra et al., 2001; Dexter et al., 2013). Secure mother–child attachment is the result of adequate maternal sensitivity, as postulated by Ainsworth et al. (1978) and demonstrated by a strong body of literature (NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1997, 2006). However, especially in high risk populations, the strength of this association may be modest and sensitivity may just partially explain child attachment security (Ward and Carlson, 1995; Seifer et al., 1996). Indeed, different risk factors can affect maternal sensitivity and child attachment security in many ways, complicating their associations. When studying the impact of risk factors on mother–child relationship, it may be appropriate to focus on more complex constructs within the theoretical attachment framework that expands that of maternal sensitivity. In this perspective, EA is a crucial construct (Biringen and Robinson, 1991; Aviezer et al., 1999; Bretherton, 2000; EA; Biringen and Robinson, 1991; Biringen, 2000) is a relationship construct based on attachment theory (Ainsworth et al., 1978) integrated with Emde’s (1980) emotions perspective. It refers to the quality of emotional exchanges between parents and their children, focusing on the two partners’ accessibility to each other and their ability to read and respond appropriately to one another’s communications (Biringen and Robinson, 1991). Studies of EA suggest that the construct not only plays a role in the prediction of attachment (Easterbrooks and Biringen, 2000, 2005) but also show significant and meaningful associations with many discrete affective indices of parent–child interaction (Robinson et al., 1993; Zimmerman and McDonald, 1995; Kogan and Carter, 1996), and can be considered a global index of the overall quality of the parent–child affective relationship (Biringen, 2000).
Psychosocial Risk Factors for Parent–Child Relationship
Among the most investigated factors thought to have a detrimental effect on parent–child relationship and child healthy development are low SES of the family and maternal psychopathology. SES influences physical and psychological health as well as the chances of social and cultural achievements during the all life span (Ensminger and Fothergill, 2003). Children born and raised in low SES families have higher chances of perinatal negative outcomes and fewer chances of receiving the appropriate physical cares and cognitive stimulation they need for their healthy development (Yoshikawa et al., 2012). Low parental SES has been predictively associated with lower children IQ and school achievements (Bradley and Corwyn, 2002; Gottfried et al., 2003; Clearfield and Niman, 2012). The effect of low SES on child development is partially mediated by reduced parenting quality (McLoyd and Wilson, 1991; Fish, 2001). Parenting quality is thought to be affected by the increased instability and stresses connected to low income and poor education conditions (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Aber et al., 2000; Bradley and Corwyn, 2002; Lemelin et al., 2006; Seow, 2012). Low SES mothers are reported to show lower levels of synchronic and responsive behavior when interacting with their children (Tamis-LeMonda et al., 2001; Ammaniti et al., 2002; Steele et al., 2002; van Bakel and Riksen-Walraven, 2002; Aviezer et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2005; Tarabulsy et al., 2005; Shin et al., 2006) as well as more inconsistent, punitive, and coercive parenting (McLoyd and Wilson, 1991). Lower levels of attachment security and a higher rate of disorganized attachment have been clearly documented in studies on low SES and low income families (Lyons-Ruth et al., 1991; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1997; van IJzendoorn et al., 1999). However, some level of inconsistency exists in this body of research and meta-analytic studies demonstrated comparable levels of attachment security between low SES and middle class children when isolated cases of neglect and maltreatment where excluded (Spieker and Booth, 1988).
A plethora of research has documented negative associations between maternal psychopathology and child psychological wellbeing (Downey and Coyne, 1990; Cummings and Davies, 1994; Seifer and Dickstein, 2000; Burstein et al., 2012). This field of research has been dominated by studies on maternal depression showing its detrimental effect on mother–child relationship and child healthy development (Downey and Coyne, 1990; Campbell et al., 1992, 1995; Beck, 1995; Murray et al., 1999; Edhborg et al., 2001; Nagata et al., 2004; Toth et al., 2009; McCabe, 2014). Maternal depression has been empirically linked to lower levels of attachment security (Lyons-Ruth et al., 1990; Lyons-Ruth et al., 1990; Murray, 1992; Teti et al., 1995; Goodman and Gotlib, 1999, 2002; Lyons- Martins and Gaffan, 2000) and diminished maternal sensitivity connected to the nature of depressive symptoms has been accounted to mediate this association (Ammaniti et al., 2007). However, the strength of this association has been found to be modest and maternal depression alone may not result in inadequate parenting quality or attachment insecurity for some children (van IJzendoorn et al., 1999; Atkinson et al., 2000; Toth et al., 2009).
Socio-Demographic Risk Factors for Parent–Child Relationship
Other conditions that have been investigated as potential risk factors in the parenting literature are two socio-demographic factors, namely young maternal age, and, to a lower extent, single parenting. However, both factors are thought to affect parent–child relationship mainly when occurring together with psychosocial risk conditions, as those described above, which indeed are especially frequent among young and single mothers (Rosenkrantz Aronson and Huston, 2004; Letourneau et al., 2004; Svoboda et al., 2012).
Adverse health and psychological outcomes have been associated with adolescent pregnancy and parenting (Long, 2009) including gestational hypertension, preterm labor and delivery (Sieger and Renk, 2007), and children’s cognitive and language delayed development (Keown et al., 2001; Rafferty et al., 2011). Being themselves in a process of “separation-individuation” and in a period of emotional and social changes during the transition to adulthood, adolescent mothers may find it difficult to face the challenges of parenthood. There is a strong body of research showing that compared to older mothers, adolescent mothers display less desirable childrearing attitudes, lower sensitivity and diminished (EA; Pomerleau et al., 2003; Easterbrooks et al., 2005; Bornstein and Putnick, 2007). Accordingly, researchers found that children of adolescent mothers are less likely to develop a secure attachment and more likely to develop behavioral problems (Madigan et al., 2006; Moran et al., 2008).
Raising a child without the help of a partner exposes the mothers to more challenges, stress and fatigue, leading to higher chances of psychological problems (Broussard et al., 2012). Children raised only by the mother show poorer outcomes in several areas of development. Research in this domain has demonstrated lower levels of social emotional adaptation, social competence, cognitive scores, school achievements as well as higher rates of anxiety disorders and deviant behaviors in children raised in single-mother compared to two-parents families (Carlson and Corcoran, 2001; Weinraub et al., 2002; Tremblay and Japel, 2003; Fergusson et al., 2007; Scharte and Bolte, 2011; Shaw et al., 2012). Studies on attachment relationship between single mothers and their children showed inconsistent results ranging from increased (Golombok et al., 1997) to slightly decreased children’s attachment security (Rosenkrantz Aronson and Huston, 2004).
All the mentioned risk factors may negatively affect mother–child relationship quality and children’s attachment security eventually affecting child healthy development. However, the predictive value of each risk factor appears to be moderated by the co-occurrence of other risk factors in a complex additive model. Nevertheless most of the studies within this body of literature took into account one risk factor at the time. Moreover, some inconsistency in the results might be related to the tendency to operationalize risk factors only in a dichotomic way by comparing families with and without a specific risk condition, disregarding factors’ intensity that can be instead accounted by considering risk factors at a continuous level (McCabe, 2014). Starting from the above considerations, the present study aimed to assess the influence of psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors on mother–child EA and on children’s attachment security in a sample of at-risk families living in Northern Italy. In an attempt to identify the specific effect on mother–child relationship of each risk factor as well as the cumulative effect of their co-occurrence, low family SES, maternal psychopathology, maternal young age, and single parenting, were analyzed both as dichotomic and as continuous variables in a longitudinal design. We specifically hypothesized to find modest negative associations between continuous measures of risk factors and the EA and attachment measures. Also, we didn’t expect differences in EA and attachment security measures between groups of dyads with or without single risk factors. Finally, we expected that EA and attachment security measures would be higher in dyads presenting socio-demographic factors alone compared to dyads presenting psychosocial risk factors alone or a combination of both. Results of this explorative study would be crucial for the identification of the families at higher risk for low relationship quality and attachment security who might profit of prevention intervention that promote emotionally available mother–child relationship and in turn reduce the risk of poor developmental outcomes.
Materials and Methods
This study involved 40 first-time mothers with specific psychosocial and/or socio-demographic risk factors and their healthy full term children living in three different areas (A, B, and C) of Northern Italy. At the time of recruitment mothers had a mean age of 27.32 years (SD = 6.56) and they were in the third trimester of pregnancy. Measures for the present study were collected when children were aged 3, 6, 12, and 18 months (with a 2-weeks flexibility interval). Participants were part of a broader intervention study on at-risk families in either the intervention or the control group (group assignment was controlled as appropriate in the analyses for the purposes of the present study, see “Materials and Methods” section). Participation in the project was proposed by midwifes, OB/GYN doctors and psychologists of the local public health centers who received specific information about the project and the inclusion criteria. After consensus was obtained, mothers were visited by a trained psychologist to verify through clinical interview and psychological assessment that at least one of the following inclusion criteria was satisfied: (1) age under 22 years; (2) single mother; (3) low family SES [family income under 13.125,90 euros (poverty threshold according to ISTAT for 2011); less than 10 years of education]; (3) high indexes of psychopathological symptoms assessed through standardized questionnaires [Global Severity Index, GSI >1 at the Symptoms-Checklist 90-R, (SCL 90-R; Derogatis, 1994 ) and/or Edimburg Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al., 1987) score >9] or being actually followed by the local public mental health services. Twenty-three mothers (57,5%) satisfied criteria for only one of the risk factors: 15 for psychopathological symptoms (37,5%), 3 for single parenting (7,5%), 3 for low family SES 3 (7,5%), and 2 for young age (5,0%). In the remaining sample, 14 mothers (35,0%) satisfied criteria for two risk factors, and 3 (7,5%) for 3 risk factors. Eighty-seven percent of the contacted mothers accepted to participate in the study and drop out was 12%. Participants gave written informed consent for their participation in the study. The study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee.
The protocol of the broader longitudinal study in which the participants were involved included several home visits of a trained psychologist for test administration, mother–child interaction observation and video recording. Measures of maternal risk factors used for the present study were collected during home visits at pregnancy and at child age three and six Measures of mother–child relationship quality and child attachment security were taken during home visits at ages 12 and 18 months, respectively.
Measures of psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors
Maternal risk factors were considered both at a dychotomic and at a continuous level. (A) Dychotomic classifications of the mothers for low family SES, maternal psychopathology, young age and single parenting are described in the Participants section where the inclusion criteria are defined. (B) As continuous measures of psychosocial risk factors the following questionnaire scores were considered: the Four-Factor Index of Social Status (Hollingshead, unpublished manuscript) as a measure of family SES; the GSI of the SCL 90-R (Derogatis, 1994) and the EPDS (Cox et al., 1987) score as measures of maternal psychopathological symptoms.
Emotional availability measure
Emotional availability in a subsample of 25 mother–child dyads was evaluated from 15-min of free-play at home interaction videorecorded continuously by a female filmmaker. A standard set of age-appropriate toys was used and mothers were instructed to play with their children in their usual way, disregarding the observer presence. Observations were coded using the emotional availability scales (EAS): Infancy to Early Childhood Version (EAS 4th Edn; Biringen, 2008). These Scales consist of six dimensions concerned with emotional regulation in the parent–child dyad. Four dimensions address the EA of the parent in relation to the child (sensitivity, structuring, non-intrusiveness, and non-hostility), and two address the EA of the child in relation to the parent (responsiveness and involving). All scales range from 1 (highly emotional unavailable) to 7 (highly emotional available) points and scores are given based on seven subcategories. The Sensitivity scale assesses the parent’s appropriate affectivity, acceptance, flexibility, clarity of perceptions, affect regulation, and variety and creativity in play displayed toward the child. Structuring assesses the degree to which the parent provides rules, regulations, and a supportive framework for interaction while appropriately scaffolding child play, exploration, or routine. Non-intrusiveness refers to the ability to be available for the child without being over-directive, over-stimulating, or overprotective. Non-hostility assesses the degree of hostility both in covert and overt forms. Responsiveness focuses on the child’s interest in exploring on his or her own and in responding to the mother’s bids (i.e., the balance between connection and autonomy) as well as on the extent of the child’s enjoyment of the interaction. Involving of mother assesses the child’s ability and willingness to engage the mother in interaction. The flexible nature of the Scales, which can be used with children from infancy to early childhood, and the choice of an ecological context of free-play with a standard toy set for pre-school children allowed us to use the same observational situation for all participants. Coding was carried out by two independent coders who were first trained on the EAS to obtain satisfactory interrater reliability with the codings the author of the EAS 4th edition and then between themselves. Interrater reliability [Biringen, 2005 was assessed using average absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC); McGraw and Wong, 1996] on 15% of the interactions coded, and ICCs ranged from 0.81 to 0.93.
Attachment security measure
Child attachment security was measured using the Italian version of the Attachment Q-Sort (AQS; Weters, 1987; Cassibba and D’Odorico, 2009) applied at 18 months of child age by a trained observer after 2–4 home visits lasting ca 1,5 h each. AQS is a Q-Sort method to evaluate child security in relation to the quality of child secure-base behavior (Vaughn and Waters, 1990). The Italian version includes 90 items describing child behavior that the observer has to sort into nine piles according to similarity with the infant’s behavior (Vaughn and Waters, 1990; Cassibba et al., 2000). By comparing this sorting with a composite description of the “hypothetically most secure infant” provided by experts in the field of attachment theory, a score for attachment security is obtained (Cassibba et al., 2000) that is thought to reflect the degree of similarity of the target child to the prototypical securely attached child (Teti and Ablard, 1989; Bretherton et al., 1989; Howes and Hamilton, 1992).
Preliminary Analysis and Analytic Plan
Distributions of the dependent variables were examined for normalcy which was confirmed for all EAS and for AQS scores. As the EAS and the AQS are measures of theoretically associated constructs, bivariate correlation analysis was performed between AQS score and EAS scores in order to verify that these measures were in fact empirically associated in this study. Results, highlighting positive association between the AQS and two scales of the EAS: mother non-intrusiveness [r(36) = 0.38, p < 0.05], and child responsiveness [r(36) = 0.40, p < 0.05], constitute relevant confirmation of the validity of the instruments used to measure the dependent variables.
Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to check associations of AQS and EAS scores with the risk factors measured as continuous variables. Then, risk factors were considered in binary fashion and for each of them (young maternal age, single parenting, maternal psychopathology, family SES), separate ANCOVAs were performed with AQS and EAS scores as dependent variables, and each risk factor (present or absent) as between factor. Finally, the risk factors were aggregated into a three-level between factor (socio-demographic only, psychosocial only, both) which served as independent variable in further separate ANCOVAs with AQS and EAS scores as dependent variables. Participants were part of a broader intervention study either in the target or control group; as a precaution, group assignment was included as covariate in all the analyses of variance described above.
Table 1 show the means and standard deviations of AQS and EAS scores for dyads with and without each risk factor and in the whole sample. Table 2 shows descriptive statistics of AQS and EAS scores for dyads with socio-demographic risk factors alone, psychosocial risk factors alone, and with both kind of risk factors.
TABLE 2. Descriptive and inferential statistics for Attachment Q-Sort and Emotional Availability Scales scores for type of risk factors.
Results showed a positive correlation of mother’s sensitivity [r(36) = 0.47, p < 0.01], structuring [r(36) = 0.55, p < 0.001], and non-hostility [r(36) = 0.38, p < 0.05) with family SES. Correlation between family SES and AQS scores was within the moderate range but did not reach significance [r(40) = 0.33, p = 0.09]. AQS and EAS scores were not significantly associated with measures of maternal psychopathology, i.e., SCL 90-R GSI and EPDS scores (Table 3).
TABLE 3. Bivariate correlations of AQS and Emotional Availability Scales scores with family SES, maternal age, SCL 90-R (GSI), EPDS.
No significant differences were found in AQS and EAS scores of dyads differentiated according to the presence/absence of each of the risk factors as defined for the inclusion criteria. However, dyads presenting a low family SES had lower scores of maternal structuring and non-intrusiveness scores [F(1,34) = 3.13, p < 0.062 and F(1,34) = 2.98, p < 0.07, respectively], compared to dyads who did not meet the criteria for this risk factor, but the results did not reach statistical significance.
A significant difference was found between dyads with different type of risk factors (socio-demographic only, psychosocial only, both), F(2,37) = 3.26, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.31. Post hoc test showed that attachment security was higher in dyads with demographic risk factor only compared to dyads with both demographic and socio-psychological fragilities, whereas attachment security of children in dyads presenting only psychosocial risk factor did not differ significantly from the other two groups. (p < 0.02, Bonferroni Correction for multiple comparisons; Table 2).
Among several influential variables, parents can be considered the “final common pathway” for children development, growth and adaptation (Bornstein, 2002). Specifically, the quality of mother–child interaction and attachment are key determinants of child social emotional adaptation and cognitive development (Bowlby, 1969; Ainsworth et al., 1978; Belsky and Pasco Fearon, 2002; Bernier and Meins, 2008). Different risk factors can affect mother–child relationship resulting in negative children outcomes as demonstrated by a strong body of research (Sameroff, 1998; Choe et al., 2013). Psychosocial risk factors, such as low family SES and maternal psycopathology, and socio-demographic risk factors, such as very young maternal age and single parenting, are among the most theoretically relevant and empirically investigated risk conditions. Although results of this line of research are substantially coherent in identifying the detrimental effect of each factor, they also point out to a complex cumulative model of risk according to which a single factor may not be influential itself whereas its predictive value might be moderated by the association with other risk conditions or by its degree of intensity (Belsky, 1984; Greenberg et al., 1993; Lyons-Ruth et al., 1993; Hubbs-Tait et al., 1996). Several intervention programs have been developed for at-risk families and some have shown positive effect on mother–child relationship quality (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2003) reducing the impact of risk factors on mother and child psychological health (Kohlhoff and Barnett, 2013). Starting from the above considerations, this study aimed at investigating the effect of psychosocial and socio-demographic risk factors on mother-child EA, measured with the EAS at 12 months of child age and child attachment security, measured with the AQS at 18 months of child age, in at risk dyads living in Northern Italy. Specifically, we focused on low family SES, maternal psycopathology, young maternal age and single parenting considered both at a continuous (where appropriate) and at a dichotomic level in order to investigate the contribution of each factor as well as the potential additive effect of more factors on mother–child relationship measures. We had a set of specific hypotheses: we expected 1) that intensity of each risk condition would show modest negative association with mother–child EA and child attachment security. Also, we hypothesized 2) to find no differences in our dependent variables between dyads differentiated according to the presence/absence of each of the risk factor, but we expected 3) socio-demographic risk factors to show a smaller effect on EA and child attachment security then psychosocial risk factors or the combination of the two type of fragility. Preliminary analyses of the selected measures validity verified positive association between some maternal and child EA scales and AQS score.
With respect to our first hypothesis, we found that in our sample the level of family SES was significantly positively associated with different dimensions of maternal EA, namely sensitivity, structuring and non-hostility. Mothers with a higher socioeconomic level recognize and respond more appropriately to child signals, structure the interaction in a way that better foster child play and exploration and are more able to limit their display of negative emotions during interaction. The positive association between SES and the quality of mother interactive behavior measured in similar and different ways has been observed in previous studies (Rosen et al., 2003; Aviezer et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2005; Tarabulsy et al., 2005) and attributed to higher cognitive, emotional, material, and social resources that characterize high compared to low SES families. The association between family SES and child attachment security at 18 months did not reach significance but the coefficient was in the moderate range and the small n of our sample may have reduced the power of our analyses. Such association has been reported in previous studies (Lyons-Ruth et al., 1991; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1997; van IJzendoorn et al., 1999) with some notable exceptions (Spieker and Booth, 1988). We also found maternal age to be positively associated with mother EA and specifically to mother structuring and non-hostility, in line with previous studies demonstrating that compared to older mothers, younger mothers show more limited knowledge about childrearing and child development, lower confidence in their parenting skills (Bornstein and Putnick, 2007) and a less emotionally available interactive style (Pomerleau et al., 2003; Gazzotti et al., 2010). Instead, no association was found between maternal age and child attachment security. Surprisingly, our measures of maternal psychopathology, i.e., SCL-90-R and EPDS (at 3 and 6 months of age respectively), showed no associations with either mother–child EA and child attachment security. Yet, psychopathological symptoms of the mother, and depression in particular, have been repeatedly reported to predict negative outcomes terms of maternal sensitivity and child attachment security though highlighting only moderate association (van IJzendoorn et al., 1999; Atkinson et al., 2000). Our findings might been explained by the small inter-subject variability in questionnaire scores of a sample including only mothers at risk for socio-demographic and/or psychosocial risk factors.
As expected, according to our second hypotheses, in our sample of at-risk mother-child dyads we did not find any effect of the single risk factors considered in a binary fashion, i.e., in terms of presence or absence, on either EA and attachment security, with the exception of the tendency of mothers with low SES to display lower structuring and non-intrusiveness which, however, did not reach significance. With respect to our third hypothesis, when we explored the effect of the type of risk factors by aggregating them into a three level variable, i.e., comparing dyads with socio-demographic risk factors only (young maternal age and/or single parenting), those with psychosocial risk factors only (low family SES and/or maternal psychopathology) and those who had both type of risk factors, results highlighted higher attachment security in children of mothers with socio-demographic risk factors only compared to those with both kinds of risk conditions, with attachment security level of children with psychosocial risk factors only somehow in the middle. Although, AQS does not allow to classify secure vs. non-secure children, when looking at previous studies, it becomes evident that mean scores of children in dyads with socio-demographic risk only are surprisingly similar to those of the no-risk typical sample used in a study of AQS reliability and validity in the Italian population (Cassibba et al., 2000). Altogether these findings speak in favor of classical approaches to psychological development of children living in at-risk families according to which the predictive value of each factor is moderated by its intensity and by the co-occurrence of other specific risk conditions (Belsky, 1984; Greenberg et al., 1993; Lyons-Ruth et al., 1993). Also, these findings are consistent with theoretical models (Belsky, 1984) and psychometrics evidences (Markon et al., 2011) according to which considering risk variables in a binary, instead of continuous, fashion might lower the possibility to describe the risk conditions in a valid and complete way (McCabe, 2014).
A crucial limitation of the present study concerns the sample size and the small ns of the subgroups of dyads satisfying each selected risk criterion or a specific association of criteria; a wider sample would allow more sophisticated and informative analyses to identify the contributing role of each single risk factors as well as their reciprocal additive effects. Moreover, the inclusion of other theoretically relevant variables, such as child temperament and maternal attachment security would enrich the study in terms of deepening our understanding of the effects of the selected risk factors on mother–child relationship and attachment. Nevertheless, the results of this study may have some important implications for the selection of inclusion criteria for prevention programs that promote emotionally available caregiving and secure attachment in at-risk families, at least within the target geographical area. In our sample, dyads with co-occurring socio-demographic and psychosocial risk factors show the lowest level of attachment security suggesting that they might be the most urgent targets for prevention intervention programs, whereas dyads with socio-demographic risk factors alone appear to be less in need of such intervention. Moreover, looking at risk factor intensity, we found that family SES and maternal age were positively associated with maternal EA, suggesting that mother child-dyads displaying low family SES or very young maternal age might deserve special attention for the risk of emotionally unavailable and undesirable interactive style.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This study was granted by the Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Scommettiamo sui Giovani project. We thank the Dipartimento di Salute Mentale dell’Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari di Trento for the valuable collaboration on the project.
Aber, J. L., Jones, S., and Cohen, J. (2000). “The impact of poverty on the mental health and development of very young children” in Handbook of Infant Mental Health, ed. C. H. Zeanah (New York: Guilford Press), 113–128.
Atkinson, L., Paglia, A., Coolbear, J., Niccols, A., Parker, K. C., and Guger, S. (2000). Attachment security: a meta-analysis of maternal mental health correlates. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 20, 1019–1040. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00023-9
Aviezer, O., Sagi, A., Joels, T., and Ziv, Y. (1999). Emotional availability and attachment representations in kibbutz infants and their mothers. Dev. Psychol. 35, 811–821. doi: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1991
Aviezer, O., Sagi-Schwartz, A., and Koren-Karie, N. (2003). Ecological constraints on the formation of infant-mother attachment relations: when maternal sensitivity becomes ineffective. Infant Behav. Dev. 26, 285–299. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(03)00032-8
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., and Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychol. Bull. 129, 195–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195
Bar-Haim, Y., Sutton, D. B., Fox, N. A., and Marvin, R. S. (2000). Stability and change of attachment at 14, 24, and 58 months of age: behavior, representation, and life events. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 41, 381–388. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00622
Belsky, J., and Pasco Fearon, R. M. (2002). Infant-mother attachment security, contextual risk, and early development: a moderational analysis. Dev. Psychopathol. 14, 293–310. doi: 10.1017/S0954579402002067
Bornstein, M. H., and Putnick, D. L. (2007). Chronological age, cognitions, and practices in European American mothers: a multivariate study of parenting. Dev. Psychol. 43, 850–864. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.520
Bornstein, M., and Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1989). “Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children” in Maternal Responsiveness: Characteristics and Consequences, ed. M. H. Bornstein (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass), 49–61. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219894306
Bretherton, I., Biringen, Z., Ridgeway, D., Maslin, C., and Sherman, M. (1989). Attachment: the parental perspective. Infant Ment. Health J. 10, 203–221. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(198923)10:3<203::AID-IMHJ2280100307>3.0.CO;2-8
Brinker, R. P., Seifer, R., and Sameroff, A. J. (1994). Relations among maternal stress, cognitive development, and early intervention in middle- and low-SES infants with developmental disabilities. Am. J. Mental Retard. 98, 463–480.
Burstein, M., Stanger, C., and Dumenci, L. (2012). Relations between parent psychopathology, family functioning, and adolescent problems in substance-abusing families: disaggregating the effects of parent gender. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 44, 631–647. doi: 10.1007/s10578-012-0288-z
Campbell, S. B., Cohn, J. F., Flanagan, C., Popper, S., and Meyers, T. (1992). Course and correlates of postpartum depression during the transition to parenthood. Dev. Psychopathol. 4, 29–47. doi: 10.1017/S095457940000554X
Cassibba, R., van IJzendoorn, M. H., and D’Odorico, L. (2000). Attachment and play in child care centers: reliability and validity of the attachment Q-sort for mothers and professional caregivers in Italy. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 24, 241–255. doi: 10.1080/016502500383377
Choe, D. E., Olson, S. L., and Sameroff, A. J. (2013). Effects of early maternal distress and parenting on the development of children’s self-regulation and externalizing behaviour. Dev. Psychopathol. 25, 2, 437–453. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412001162
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., and Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 150, 782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
De Wolff, M. S., and van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: a meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Dev. 68, 571–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04218.x
Dexter, C. A., Wong, K., Stacks, A. M., Beeghly, M., and Barnett, D. (2013). Parenting and attachment among low-income African American and Caucasian preschoolers. J. Fam. Psychol. 27, 629–38. doi: 10.1037/a0033341
Easterbrooks, M. A., and Biringen, Z. (2000). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: mapping the terrain of emotional availability and attachment. Attach. Hum. Dev. 2, 123–129. doi: 10.1080/14616730050085518
Easterbrooks, M. A., and Biringen, Z. (2005). The emotional availability scales: methodological refinements of the construct and clinical implications related to gender and at-risk interactions. Infant Ment. Health J. 26, 291–294. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20053
Easterbrooks, M. A., Chaudhuri, J. H., and Cestsdottir, S. (2005). Patterns of emotional availability among young mothers and their infants: a dyadic, contextual analysis. Infant Ment. Health J. 26, 309–326. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20057
Edhborg, M., Lundh, W., Seimyr, L., and Widstrom, A. M. (2001). The long-term impact of postnatal depressed mood on mother–child interaction: a preliminary study. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 19, 61–71. doi: 10.1080/02646830123255
Emde, R. N. (1980). “Emotional availability: a reciprocal reward system for infants and parents with implications for prevention of psychosocial disorders,” in Parent-Infant Relationships, ed. P. M. Taylor (Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton)
Ensminger, M. E., and Fothergill, K. E. (2003). “A decade of measuring SES: what it tells us and where to go from here,” in Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development, ed. M. H. Bornstein and R. H. Bradley (Mahvah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 13–27.
Evans, G. W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Gentile, L., and Salpekar, N. (2005). The role of chaos in poverty and children’s socioemotional adjustment. Psychol. Sci. 16, 560–565. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01575.x
Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., and Horwood, L. J. (2007). Exposure to single parenthood in childhood and later mental health, educational, economic, and criminal behavior outcomes. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 1089–1095. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.9.1089
Gazzotti, S., Spinelli, M., Albizzati, A., and Riva Crugnola, C. (2010). Maternità in età adolescenziale: attaccamento materno, stili di interazione, stati affettivi, coordinazione affettiva madre-bambino. Età Evol. 96, 64–74.
Golombok, S., Tasker, F., and Murray, C. (1997). Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: family relationships and the socioemotional development of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 38, 783–792. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01596.x
Goodman, S. H., and Gotlib, I. H. (1999). Risk for psychopathology in the children of depressed mothers: a developmental model for understanding mechanisms of transmission. Psychol. Rev. 106, 458–490. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.458
Hubbs-Tait, L., Huges, K. P., Culp, A. M., Osofsky, J. D., Hann, D. M., Eberarhart-Wright, A.,et al. (1996). Children of adolescent mothers: attachment representation, maternal depression, and later problems. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 66, 416–426. doi: 10.1037/h0080192
Kogan, N., and Carter, A. S. (1996). Mother-infant reengagement following the still-face: the role of maternal emotional availability in infant affect regulation. Infant Beh. Dev. 19, 359–370. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90034-X
Kohlhoff, J., and Barnett, B. (2013). Parenting self-efficacy: links with maternal depression, infant behaviour and adult attachment. Early. Hum. Dev. 89, 249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.01.008
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., and Swank, P. R. (2006). Responsive parenting: Establishing early foundations for social communication and problem solving. Dev. Psychol. 42, 627–642. doi: 10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2067
Lemelin, J. P., Tarabulsy, G. M., and Provost, M. A. (2006). Preschool cognitive development from infant temperament, maternal sensitivity and psychosocial risk. Merrill Palmer Q. 52 , 779–806. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0038
Letourneau, N. L., Stewart, M. J., and Barnfather, A. K. (2004). Adolescent mothers: support needs, resources, and support-education interventions. J. Adolesc. Health 35, 509–525. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.01.007
Lyons-Ruth, K., Alpern, L., and Repacholi, B. (1993). Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Dev. 64, 572–585. doi: 10.2307/1131270
Lyons-Ruth, K., Connell, D., Grunebaum, H., and Botein, S. (1990). Infants at social risk: maternal depression and family support services as mediators of infant development and security of attachment. Child Dev. 61, 85–98. doi: 10.2307/1131049
Lyons-Ruth, K., Repacholi, B., McLeod, S., and Silva, E. (1991). Disorganized attachment behavior in infancy: short-term stability, maternal and infant correlates, and risk-related subtypes. Dev. Psychopathol. 3, 377–396. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400007586
Madigan, S., Morgan, G., and Pederson, D. R. (2006). Unresolved state of mind, disorganized attachment relationships, and disrupted interactions of adolescents mothers and their infants. Dev. Psychol. 42, 293–304. doi: 10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.113
Markon, K. E., Chmielewski, M., and Miller, C. J. (2011). The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: a quantitative review. Psychol. Bull. 137, 856–879. doi: 10.1037/a0023678
Martins, C., and Gaffan, E. A. (2000). Effects of early maternal depression on patterns of infant-mother attachment: a meta-analytic investigation. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 41, 737–746. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00661
McCabe, J. E. (2014). Maternal personality and psychopathology as determinants of parenting behavior: a quantitative integration of two parenting literatures. Psychol. Bull. 140, 722–750. doi: 10.1037/a0034835
McLoyd, V. C., and Wilson, L. (1991). “The strain of living poor: parenting, social support, and child mental health,” in Children in Poverty: Child Development and Public Policy, ed. A. C. Huston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 105–135.
Moran, G., Forbes, L., Evans, E., Tarabulsy, G. M., and Madigan, S. (2008). Both maternal sensitivity and atypical maternal behavior independently predict attachment security and disorganization in adolescent mother-infant relationships. Infant Behav. Dev. 31, 321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.12.012
Murray, L., Sinclair, D., Cooper, P., Ducoumau, P., and Turner, P. (1999). The socioemotional development of 5-year-old children of postnatally depressed mothers. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 40, 1259–1271.
Nagata, M., Nagai, Y., Sobajima, H., Ando, T., and Honjo, S. (2004). Depression in the early postpartum period and attachment to children – in mothers of NICU infants. Infant Child Dev. 13, 93–110. doi: 10.1002/icd.339
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1997). The effects of infant child care on infant–mother attachment security: results of the NICHD study of early child care. Child Dev. 68, 860–879. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01967.x
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2006). Infant–mother attachment classification: risk and protection in relation to changing maternal caregiving quality. Dev. Psychol. 42, 38–58. doi: 10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.168
Nievar, M. A., and Becker, B. J. (2008). Sensitivity as a privileged predictor of attachment: a second perspective on De Wolff and van IJzendoorn’s meta-analysis. Soc. Dev. 17, 102–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00417.x
Pomerleau, A., Scuccimarri, C., and Malcuit, G. (2003). Mother-infant behavioral interactions in teenage and adult mothers during the first six months postpartum: relations with infant development. Infant Men. Health J. 24, 495–509. doi: 10.1002/imhj.10073
Rafferty, Y., Griffin, K. W., and Lodise, M. (2011). Adolescent motherhood and developmental outcomes of children in early head start: the influence of maternal parenting behaviors, well-being, and risk factors within the family setting. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 81, 228–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01092.x
Rosen, D., Spencer, M. S., Tolman, R. M., Williams, D. R., and Jackson, J. S. (2003). Psychiatric disorders and substance dependence among unmarried low-income mothers. Health Soc. Work 28, 157–165. doi: 10.1093/hsw/28.2.157
Rosenkrantz Aronson, S., and Huston, A. (2004). The mother-infant relationship in single, cohabiting, and married families: a case for marriage? J. Fam. Psychol. 18, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0893-322.214.171.124
Sameroff, A. J. (2000). “Ecological perspectives on developmental risk,” in WAIMH Handbook of Infant Mental Health: Vol. 5, Infant Mental Health in Groups at High Risk acura di, eds J. D. Osofsky and H. E. Fitzgerald (New York: Wiley), 1–33.
Seifer, R., Schiller, M., Sameroff, A. J., Resnick, S., and Riordan, K. (1996). Attachment, maternal sensitivity, and infant temperament during the first year of life. Dev. Psychol. 32, 12–25. doi: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.199
Seow, W. K. (2012). Environmental, maternal, and child factors which contribute to early childhood caries: a unifying conceptual model. Int. J. Paediatr. Den. 22, 157–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01186.x
Sieger, K., and Renk, K. (2007). Pregnant and parenting adolescents: a study of ethnic identity, emotional and behavioral functioning, child characeristics, and social support. J. Youth Adolesc. 36, 567–581. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9182-6
Svoboda, D. V., Shaw, T. V., Barth, R. P., and Bright, C. L. (2012). Pregnancy and parenting among youth in foster care: a review. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 34, 867–875. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.023
Tarabulsy, G. M., Bernier, A., Provost, M. A., Maranda, J., Larose, S., Moss, E.,et al. (2005). Another look inside the gap: ecological contributions to the transmission of attachment in a sample of adolescent mother-infant dyads. Dev. Psychol. 41, 212–224. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52
Teti, D. M., Gelfand, D., Messinger, D., and Isabella, R. (1995). Maternal depression and the quality of early attachment: an examination of infants, preschoolers, and their mothers. Dev. Psychol. 31, 364–376. doi: 10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2064
Toth, S. L., Rogosch, F. A., Sturge-Apple, M., and Cicchetti, D. (2009). Maternal depression, children’s attachment security, and representational development: an organizational perspective. Child Dev. 80, 192–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01254.x
Tremblay, R. E., and Japel, C. (2003). “Prevention during pregnancy, infancy and preschool years,” in Early Prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviour, eds D. P. Farrington and J. W. Coid (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
van Bakel, H. J. A., and Riksen-Walraven, J. M. (2002). Parenting and development of one-year-olds: links with parental, contextual and child characteristics. Child Dev. 73, 256–273. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00404
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., and Bakersman-Kranenburg, M. J. (1999). Disorganized attachment in early childhood: meta-analyses of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Dev. Psychopathol. 11, 225–249. doi: 10.1017/S0954579499002035
Vaughn, B. E., and Waters, E. (1990). Attachment behavior at home and in laboratory: q-sort observations and Strange Situation classi cation of one-year-olds. Child Dev. 61, 1965–1973. doi: 10.2307/1130850
Vondra, J. I., Shaw, D. S., Swearingen, L., Cohen, M., and Owens, E. B. (2001). Attachment stability and emotional and behavioral regulation from infancy to preschool age. Dev. Psychopathol. 13, 13–33. doi: 10.1017/S095457940100102X
Ward, M. J., and Carlson, E. A. (1995). Associations among adult attachment representations, maternal sensitivity, and infant-mother attachment in a sample of adolescent mothers. Child Dev. 66, 69–79. doi: 10.2307/1131191
Weinraub, M., Horvath, D. L., and Gringlas, M. B. (2002). “Single parenthood,” in Handbook of Parenting: Being and Becoming a Parent, Vol. 3, ed. M. H. Bornstein (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 109–140.
Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., and Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth implications for prevention. Am. Psychol. 67, 272–284. doi: 10.1037/a0028015
Keywords: attachment, emotional availability, psychosocial risk, parenting, psychosocial prevention
Citation: De Falco S, Emer A, Martini L, Rigo P, Pruner S and Venuti P (2014) Predictors of mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security in at-risk families. Front. Psychol. 5:898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00898
Received: 05 June 2014; Accepted: 29 July 2014;
Published online: 20 August 2014.
Edited by:Silvia Salcuni, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Reviewed by:Alessandra Simonelli, University of Padova, Italy
Vincenzo Paolo Senese, Second University of Naples, Italy
Copyright © 2014 De Falco, Emer, Martini, Rigo, Pruner and Venuti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Simona De Falco, Università degli Studi di Trento, Rovereto, Italy e-mail: email@example.com
†Simona De Falco and Alessandra Emer have contributed equally to this work.