In the original article, we referred to Canini et al., 2013. This was an error. It should be Canini et al., 2011. In the reference section the reference was incorrectly written as:
Canini, L., Benini, S., and Leonardi, R. (2013). Classifying cinematographic shot types. Multimed. Tools Appl. 62, 51–73. doi: 10.1007/s11042-011-0916-9
The correct reference should be:
Canini, L., Benini, S., and Leonardi, R. (2011). “Affective analysis on patterns of shot types in movies,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA 2011).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
The original article has been updated.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
theory of mind, shot scale, close up shot, facial expression, characters, film
Citation
Rooney B and Bálint KE (2018) Corrigendum: Watching More Closely: Shot Scale Affects Film Viewers' Theory of Mind Tendency But Not Ability. Front. Psychol. 9:261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00261
Received
04 February 2018
Accepted
16 February 2018
Published
01 March 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited and reviewed by
Justin H. G. Williams, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Rooney and Bálint.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Brendan Rooney brendan.rooney@ucd.ie
This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.