Systematic Review ARTICLE
Video Games for Well-Being: A Systematic Review on the Application of Computer Games for Cognitive and Emotional Training in the Adult Population
- Riccardo Massa Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Background: Although several excellent reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the effect of video game trainings as tools to enhance well-being, most of them specifically focused on the effects of digital games on brain plasticity or cognitive decline in children and seniors. On the contrary, only one meta-analysis results to be focused on the adult population, and it is restricted to examining the effects of training with a particular genre of games (action video games) on cognitive skills of healthy adults.
Objectives: This systematic review was aimed to identify research evidences about the impact on cognitive [i.e., processing and reaction times (RTs), memory, task-switching/multitasking, and mental spatial rotation] and emotional skills of video games training in the healthy adult population.
Methods: A multi-component analysis of variables related to the study, the video games, and the outcomes of the training was made on the basis of important previous works. Databases used in the search were PsycINFO, Web of Science (Web of Knowledge), PubMed, and Scopus. The search string was: [(“Video Games” OR “Computer Games” OR “Interactive Gaming”)] AND [(“Cognition”) OR (“Cognitive”) OR (“Emotion”) OR (“Emotion Regulation”)] AND [“Training”].
Results: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and were further classified into the different analysis' variables. The majority of the retrieved studies used commercial video games, and action games in particular, which resulted to be the most commonly used, closely followed by puzzle games. Effect sizes for training with video games on cognitive skills in general ranged from 0.06 to 3.43: from 0.141 to 3.43 for processing and RTs, 0.06 to 1.82 for memory, 0.54 to 1.91 for task switching/multitasking, and 0.3 to 3.2 for mental spatial rotation; regarding video games for the training of emotional skills, effect sizes ranged from 0.201 to 3.01.
Conclusion: Overall, findings give evidences of benefits of video games training on cognitive and emotional skills in relation to the healthy adult population, especially on young adults. Efficacy has been demonstrated not only for non-commercial video games or commercial brain-training programs, but for commercial video games as well.
Over the last 40 years, video games have increasingly had a transformational impact on how people play and enjoy themselves, as well as on many more aspects of their lives (Yeh et al., 2001; Zyda, 2005; Boyle et al., 2012). Contrary to popular belief, which sees male children or teenagers as main targets of the gaming industry, the average player is instead 30 years old, and the entire gaming population is roughly equally divided into male and female players, therefore representing a daily activity for a consistent percentage of the adult population (Entertainment Software Assotiation, 2015). Thanks to the wide availability on the market, the affordable cost and the massive popularity, video games already represent crucial tools as a source of entertainment, and are soon expected to become critical also in another fields, including the mental health panorama (Granic et al., 2014; Jones et al., 2014).
While much of the early research on computer games focused on the negative impacts of playing digital games, particularly on the impact of playing violent entertainment games on aggression (e.g., Ferguson, 2007), and addiction (e.g., Gentile, 2009), gradually, scientific studies have also recognized the potential positive impact of video games on people's health (e.g., Anderson et al., 2010; Jones et al., 2014).
In recent decades, the field of computer gaming has increasingly developed toward serious purposes, and both commercial and non-commercial video games (i.e., developed ad hoc by researchers for the training of specific individuals' skills) have been tested by several studies. As early as in 1987, it was for the first time observed that famous commercial video games (i.e., Donkey Kong e Pac-Man) can have a positive effect on cognitive skills, improving the RTs of older adults (Clark et al., 1987). A few years later, in 1989, Space Fortress, the first non-commercial computer game designed by cognitive psychologists as a training and research tool (Donchin, 1989) was considered so successful that it was added to the training program of the Israeli Air Force. From that moment on, numerous video games have been developed with the specific purpose of changing patterns of behavior, and are often defined in literature as “serious games” (Zyda, 2005) as they use gaming features as the primary medium for serious purposes (Fleming et al., 2016).
Since these pioneering studies, numerous researches have investigated the potentiality of various video games, both commercial and non-commercial, mainly in relation with cognitive skills of seniors. For instance, it has been observed that the use of complex strategy video games can enhance cognitive flexibility, particularly in older adults (Stern et al., 2011). Furthermore, playing a commercial computer cognitive training program results in significant improvement in visuospatial working memory, visuospatial learning, and focused attention in healthy older adults (Peretz et al., 2011).
Besides being useful tools for the training of cognitive processes, various studies have demonstrated that video games offer a variety of positive emotion-triggering situations (e.g., Ryan et al., 2006; Russoniello et al., 2009; McGonigal, 2011), that may be of benefit during training of emotional skills, including self-regulation habits (Gabbiadini and Greitemeyer, 2017). For instance, puzzle video games such as Tetris, characterized by low cognitive loads and generally short time demands, are capable of positive effects on the players' mood, generating positive emotions and relaxation (Russoniello et al., 2009). Furthermore, by continuously providing new challenges, either it is switching from one level to another (e.g., Portal 2) or between different avatars (e.g., World of Warcraft), video games demand players to “unlearn” their previous strategies and flexibly adapt to new systems without experiencing frustration and anxiety (Granic et al., 2014).
Although several excellent reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the effect of video games training as tools for enhancing individuals well-being, in particular regarding cognitive and emotive enhancement (e.g., Boyle et al., 2016; Lumsden et al., 2016), most of them specifically focused on the effects of digital games on brain plasticity or cognitive decline in children and seniors (e.g., Lu et al., 2012; Lampit et al., 2014). Consonant findings regarding the positive relationship between video game training and benefits on various cognitive skills have been demonstrated by both behavioral studies (e.g., Baniqued et al., 2014) and meta-analytic studies (Toril et al., 2014) regarding both the aforementioned populations. On the contrary, only one meta-analysis focused on the adult population and it is restricted to examining the effects of training with a particular genre of games (action video games) on cognitive skills on healthy adults (Wang et al., 2016).
Despite this scarcity of focus on the adult population, the latter represents an extremely interesting and unique group, with very peculiar characteristics from a neurological and psychological point of view if compared to children and elders. As stated by Finch, the adult age, including both young adults (18–35 years old) and middle age adults (35–55 years old), plays an important role in the life-span development, and therefore very well deserves to be studied thoroughly (Finch, 2009). On the one hand, the effects of the so-called inverted U curve of neuroplasticity and cognitive performance starts to be evident during the adult age, especially the middle-age (Cao et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2015). On the other, it is well known that the level of psychological stress perceived by adults is rather high, and it can result in important mental and health disorders (Kudielkaa et al., 2004).
Moreover, as the literature states, baseline individual differences regarding age can determine variations in training effectiveness (Jaeggi et al., 2011; Valkanova et al., 2014), and if it is safe to say that video games can have beneficial effects when included in a training (e.g., Baniqued et al., 2014; Toril et al., 2014), such effects might indeed vary based on age-specific aspects which therefore cannot be overlooked (Wang, 2017).
Consequently, in the current review, we will describe experimental studies that have been conducted between 2012 and 2017, with the aim to identify research evidences about the impact on cognitive and emotional skills of video games training in the adult population. Specifically, a multi-component analysis of variables related to the study, video games, and outcomes of training was made on the basis on important previous works (Connolly et al., 2012; Kueider et al., 2012; Boyle et al., 2016), which provide a useful framework for organizing the research along key variables.
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009).
With the objective of providing an overview of the experimental studies that have been conducted to test the benefits of different categories of video games used as training tools of cognitive or emotional domains for the adult population, a computer-based search for relevant publications was performed in several databases. Databases used in the search were PsycINFO, Web of Science (Web of Knowledge), PubMed, and Scopus. The search string was: [(“Video Games” OR “Computer Games” OR “Interactive Gaming”)] AND [(“Cognition”) OR (“Cognitive”) OR (“Emotion”) OR (“Emotion Regulation”)] AND [”Training"].
Selection of Articles for Inclusion in the Review
To avoid the risk of bias, PRISMA recommendations for systematic literature analysis have been strictly followed (Moher et al., 2009). Two authors (Federica Pallavicini, Ambra Ferrari) independently selected paper abstracts and titles, analyzed the full papers that met the inclusion criteria, and resolved any disagreements through consensus. Selected papers have to: (a) include empirical evidences on the impact and outcomes of video game based training; (b) have been published during the last 5 years (namely from January 2012 to August 2017), in analogy with several other relevant previous works (i.e., Connolly et al., 2012; Boyle et al., 2016); (c) include participants within an age range of 18–59 years old; (d) only include samples of healthy participants, i.e., not suffering from any neurological disorder (e.g., traumatic brain injury), or psychiatric disorders according to DSM-5 Axis I (American Psychiatric Association, 2013); (e) be published on peer-reviewed journals.
Coding of Selected Studies, Video Games, and Training Outcomes
The papers selected on the basis of the inclusion criteria were coded from the data extraction pro-forma that was developed by Connolly (Connolly et al., 2012), and subsequently modified by Boyle et al. (2016), adapting it to the specificity of this review and its area of interest. In particular, in this systematic review papers were coded with respect to:
• Video Game Variables: The game category (whether the game was commercial or non-commercial); the game genre (action games; driving-racing games; puzzle games; strategy games; simulation games; exergames; horror games; commercial brain training programs; arcade games; adventure games); the platform for the game (console, PC/laptop, or mobile gaming). First of all, the category of the game has been included to explore the effectiveness of several commercial titles, used “as-is” (without modifications), which in previous studies resulted to be effective for the cognitive training (e.g., Green and Bavelier, 2006; Dye et al., 2009). Furthermore, the categorization was included in order to analyze the efficacy of ad hoc developed games, about which an ongoing debate about their effectiveness still persists (e.g., Owen et al., 2010). Secondly, the classification of video game genres was considered because of the fact that, under many points of view, not all video games are equal and their effects strongly depend on specific characteristics of the game itself (Achtman et al., 2008; van Muijden et al., 2012). In addition, it has been reported that combinations between the neurological stage of the participants and the precise features of each video game produce unique results in a matter of benefits on mental skills (Ball et al., 2002; van Muijden et al., 2012). There is no standard accepted taxonomy of genre, although one of the most adopted is the Herz's system (Herz, 1997), while others studies seem to simply divide action games from any other kind, often defined as casual games as a whole (e.g., Baniqued et al., 2013, 2014). Here, we propose the above categorization, which resembles the present commercial classification as much as possible, defining ten different genres of commercial video games. Thirdly, new technologies such as mobile devices and online games have recently expanded the ways in which games have traditionally been played, their medium of delivery and the different platforms available. Platforms of delivery represent important information about video game training, primarily because they are the way in which the training itself can be accessed (Aker et al., 2016).
• Variables Related to the Study: The sample included in the study (sample size, mean age, or age range); the research design used (categorized as a Randomized Controlled Trial or Quasi Experimental); the measures used for the assessment of outcomes (self-report questionnaires, cognitive tests, fMRI, physiological data, etc.); the duration of training (duration, intensity, and the total amount of sessions); the effects size of each training outcome, reporting partial-eta squared (η2), with values closer to 1.0 indicating a stronger effect size, and Cohen's d; the calculation of range and mean value of effect sizes for each training outcome has been expressed as Cohen's d, applying the conversion formula when reported by the study in terms of partial-eta squared (η2) (Cohen, 1998); where not reported in the study, standardized Cohen's d effect sizes were derived following a computation formula: the one described in Dunlap et al. (1996) in order to calculate d from dependent t-tests; the computation formula by Thalheimer and Cook (2002) for ANOVAs with two distinct groups (df = 1); the calculation formula by Rosenthal and DiMatteo (2001) from χ2 (with one degree of freedom); otherwise, in cases where effect sizes could not be calculated because not reported in the study or because the necessary data to derive them through formulas were not present, p-value was reported instead ( e.g., Oei and Patterson, 2013; Wang et al., 2014; Chandra et al., 2016). The sample, study design, and measures of training outcomes have been included as relevant variables in analogy to what has been done in previous reviews (Boyle et al., 2012; Connolly et al., 2012), to facilitate the access to easily classified and comparable studies among the literature. An indication of mean age or age range has been provided in order to identify studies conducted on young vs. middle-aged adults. Training-related factors have also been considered, including the duration, intensity, and total amount of training sessions, as well as the effect sizes of the training outcomes, since they represent useful information about the characteristics and feasibility of the training itself (Hempel et al., 2004).
• Video Game-Based Training Outcome Variables: The selected papers have been divided into two macro-categories: cognition and emotion. Regarding cognition, authors identified five domain-specific subcategories, following the classification proposed by Kueider et al. (2012), partially adapted to the specificity of the results that emerged from the review, specifically: (1) multiple domain, namely trainings focused on more than one cognitive skill, such as trainings including reasoning, episodic memory, and perceptual speed as target skills at the same time; (2) processing speed and reaction times (RTs), i.e., respectively, the ability to quickly process information (Shanahan et al., 2006), and the amount of time needed to process and respond to a stimulus and is critical for handling information (Garrett, 2009); (3) memory, defined as the ability to retain, store, and recall information (Baddeley and Hitch, 1974), including many different types of memory, such as episodic, short-term, visual and spatial working memory; (4) task-switching/multitasking, defined as a whole as attributes of control processes while switching from one task to another (Dove et al., 2000); (5) mental spatial rotation, that is the ability to mentally rotate an object (Shepard and Metzler, 1971). Such categorization has been chosen among many others proposed by literature (e.g., Sala and Gobet, 2016; Stanmore et al., 2017; Bediou et al., 2018), because of its particular adaptability to the search results at hand, and because of its effectiveness in defining precise sub-categories of cognitive skills.
Papers Identified by Search Terms
A large number of papers (1,423) published in the time period between January 2012 and August 2017 was identified. As discussed in section Papers Selected Using our Inclusion Criteria, this set of papers was further screened, obtaining a set of 35 relevant papers (see Figure 1).
Papers Selected Using Our Inclusion Criteria
Applying the four inclusion criteria to these papers, 35 papers were identified (see Table 1). The largest number of papers was found in Scopus, followed by PsycINFO, Pubmed, and Web of Science (Web of Knowledge).
Analysis of Game Variables
Video Games Category
Considering the entirety of the studies, 42 commercial video games and 7 non-commercial video games have been tested as training tools for cognitive or emotional skills. As for video games used for cognitive enhancement specifically, a total of 38 commercial video games and 6 non-commercial video games have been adopted; concerning emotional enhancement, instead, 4 commercial games and 1 non-commercial game have been used as training tools in the studies included in this review.
Video Games Genres
Among the studies included in this systematic review, the genre of commercial games was very varied, with action games (15) being the most used, followed by puzzle games (8), brain training games (5), exergames, and driving-racing games (3 for each category), simulation, driving racing games and exergames (3 games each), adventure games (2 games for each genre), and, finally, strategy games, arcade games, and horror games (1 game for each genre). Regarding training of cognitive skills specifically, among commercial games, the genre was very varied, with action games (14) and puzzle games (7) being the most used, followed by brain training games (5), simulation and driving-racing games (3 games), exergames and adventure games (2 games each), and, finally, strategy games and arcade games (1 game for each genre). As for emotional training, only 1 study adopted a non-commercial video games, while a variety of commercial video games were used (1 horror game, 1 action game, 1 puzzle game, and 1 exergame).
Considering the retrieved studies, games delivered via PC or laptop were the most popular in all categories (20 studies), followed by mobile (8 studies) and console (7 studies). Regarding cognitive training, 18 video games delivered via PC were used, 6 via console, 6 via mobile. As for emotional training, 2 video games were delivered via PC, 2 via console, and 1 via mobile.
Analysis of Variables Related to the Study
The mean number of participants included in the emerged studies was 54.4 (cognition: M = 56.1; emotion: M = 42.8), ranging between 5 (Chandra et al., 2016) and 209 (Baniqued et al., 2013). The samples' mean age, instead, was 24.2 (cognition: M = 23.8; emotion: M = 27.7).
In general, 28 studies included in the review have use a randomized control trial (RCT), while 7 studies have used a quasi-experimental design. The RCT was the design of choice of 24 studies related to cognitive training (e.g., Hutchinson et al., 2016; Looi et al., 2016). A quasi-experimental design was instead adopted in six studies directed at the evaluation of cognitive trainings based on video games (Mathewson et al., 2012; Montani et al., 2014). As for emotional training, four studies followed a RCT design (e.g., Bouchard et al., 2012), while 1 a quasi-experimental design (Naugle et al., 2014).
Duration of the Training
The length of the trainings proposed by studies included in this systematic review resulted to be rather heterogeneous, both in the number of sessions and in the number of weeks. In particular, the mean number of sessions was 10.1, ranging from 1 to 60 sessions, while the mean number of hours played was 13.5, ranging between 10 min and 50 h. As for cognitive training, a minimum of one session (e.g., Colzato et al., 2013; Cherney et al., 2014), and a maximum of 60 sessions (Kühn et al., 2014). The number of hours spent playing the different video games differed from study to study as well: from several minutes (Stroud and Whitbourne, 2015) to up to 50 h (Green et al., 2012; Chandra et al., 2016). As for emotional training, the minimum number of sessions was 1 as well, while the maximum was 10 (Bailey and West, 2013); the minimum time spent playing was of 25 min (Dennis and O'Toole, 2014; Dennis-Tiwary et al., 2016), and the maximum was 10 h (Bailey and West, 2013).
Measures Used for the Assessment of Outcomes
The measures of the training outcome adopted in the studies included in this systematic review predictably have largely been constituted by cognitive tests, for a total of 33 studies, 30 related to cognitive training (e.g., Baniqued et al., 2014), and 3 to emotional training (e.g., Bailey and West, 2013). Nonetheless, numerous studies (19) have included self-administered psychological questionnaires: 14 aimed at cognitive training (e.g., Chandra et al., 2016), and 5 to emotional training (e.g., Dennis and O'Toole, 2014), while physiological measures were used in a total of 2 studies, both emotional trainings (e.g., Bouchard et al., 2012). fMRI-based assessments were instead used to measure the outcomes of cognitive trainings in two studies (e.g., Nikolaidis et al., 2014) and EEG assessments were used in a total of three studies (1) related to cognitive training (i.e., Mathewson et al., 2012), and (2) to emotional training (e.g., Bailey and West, 2013).
Analysis of Video Game Training Outcomes
Thirty studies used cognitive domain-specific training programs including memory, task-switching/multitasking and mental spatial rotation. Across all cognitive trainings, the effect sizes' (Cohen's d) range was 0.141–3.43 for processing and RTs (M = 1.18), 0.06–1.82 for memory (M = 0.667), 0.54–1.91 for task-switching/multitasking (M = 1.11), and 0.3–3.2 for mental spatial rotation (M = 1.5).
• Multiple domains (13 studies): Because of the wide literature consensus about the little to non-transferability of cognitive training effects to untrained skills (Rebok et al., 2007), a rather high number of retrieved studies aimed at the enhancement of multiple cognitive domains with a single training, with the objective of deepening our knowledge about generalizability across domains. Training with action video games has been reported to enhance processing speed and RTs (Oei and Patterson, 2013, 2015; Schubert et al., 2015; Chandra et al., 2016), but no effect on spatial (Oei and Patterson, 2015) nor visual (Schubert et al., 2015; Chandra et al., 2016) working memory has been reported. Concerning other categories of commercial video games, training with puzzle games was shown to improve task switching skills and inhibitory control, but not visual and spatial working memory, episodic memory or perceptual speed (Baniqued et al., 2014). Spatial working memory, as well as RTs, improved after training with a simulation game (Rolle et al., 2017). Better RTs have also been reported after training with FPS games (i.e., first person shooter games, in which the player shoots at targets while witnessing the scene as through the eyes of the character they are controlling), which also seemed to have positive effects on processing speed, but not on mental spatial rotation skills (Choi and Lane, 2013). Moreover, it was reported that video game training with an adventure game can augment gray matter in brain areas crucial for spatial navigation and visual working memory, along with evidence for behavioral changes of navigation strategy (Kühn et al., 2014). As far as brain training games are concerned, studies confirmed that this genre of video games can improve task-switching, short-term memory, RTs and processing speed more heavily compared to a puzzle game (Nouchi et al., 2013). Nonetheless, two different studies did not highlight any advantage of puzzle games over other video game genres in enhancing cognitive skills such as mental spatial rotation (Shute et al., 2015), nor for cognitive performance on other domains (e.g., task-switching, visual, and spatial working memory) (Kable et al., 2017). Lastly, a non-commercial game, Space Fortress, was proven to be effective as a training for visual working memory (Lee et al., 2012), and alpha and delta EEG oscillations during game play of this particular video game were shown to predict learning and improvements in such cognitive skill, while no similar effects were found on task-switching/multitasking skills (Mathewson et al., 2012).
• Processing speed and reaction times (8 studies): Studies reported that action games (Green et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014), FPS games (Colzato et al., 2013; Hutchinson et al., 2016), adventure (Li et al., 2016), and puzzle games (Stroud and Whitbourne, 2015) can be considered effective training tools for processing speed and RTs. Moreover, in a study comparing the effectiveness of various genres of commercial video games, action and driving-racing games were proven to decrease RTs and processing speed more effectively than a puzzle game (Wu and Spence, 2013). Only one study did not report any benefit of commercial video games over these particular skills (van Ravenzwaaij et al., 2014).
• Memory (4 studies): Effective trainings of visual working memory have been carried out with an action game (Blacker et al., 2014) as well as with an adventure game (Clemenson and Stark, 2015). Concerning non-commercial video games, a mathematics video game training was shown to be effective on short-term and visual working memory (Looi et al., 2016). Furthermore, individual differences in the post-minus-pre changes in activation of regions implicated in visual working memory during gameplay of an ad hoc developed game (Space Fortress) have been reported to predict performance changes in an untrained working memory task (Nikolaidis et al., 2014).
• Task-switching/multitasking (3 studies): The cost of dual tasking, as well as the cost of task switching, decreased after training with a custom-made video game (Montani et al., 2014). Moreover, a training based on an ad hoc developed game lead to significantly better performance on cognitive shifting tests after playing for 2 h over four sessions (i.e., reaching a high level in the game) (Parong et al., 2017). The same results, in fact, were not obtained if participants were asked to play for only 1 h over two sessions (Parong et al., 2017). Furthermore, playing commercial puzzle games improved task-switching ability (Oei and Patterson, 2014).
• Mental spatial rotation (2 studies): Enhancement of mental spatial rotation abilities was reported after training with commercial exergames and driving-racing games, with a greater advance for women (Cherney et al., 2014). In contrast, no improvement was observed after training with other commercial games (one exergame and several action games), probably because of the limited number of participants (Dominiak and Wiemeyer, 2016).
Five studies tested video games as tools for training emotional skills (Table 2). Across all these training programs, the effect sizes' range (Cohen's d) was 0.201–3.01 (M = 0.897). First of all, playing a commercial action game resulted in brain changes related to the emotion processing of facial expressions, with a reduction in the allocation of attention to happy faces, suggesting that caution should be exercised when using action video games to modify visual processing (Bailey and West, 2013). Moreover, playing exergames at a self-selected intensity has been reported to positively influence emotional responses (enjoyment, changes in positive and negative affects) (Naugle et al., 2014). Interestingly, commercial video games have also been tested as a tool to provide interactive Stress Management Training (SMT) programs, mainly used for decreasing levels of perceived stress and negative effects. In particular, training with a commercial horror video game combined with arousal reduction strategies (e.g., exposure to stressful scenarios, traditional biofeedback techniques) has shown efficacy in increasing resilience to stress in soldiers, as observed through analyses of salivary cortisol level conducted along the training (Bouchard et al., 2012). Regarding non-commercial video games, training with an ad hoc non-commercial video game has been shown to help trait-anxious adult people handle emotional and physiological responses to stressors (Dennis and O'Toole, 2014), as well as improve behavioral performance in an anxiety-related stress task among female participants (Dennis-Tiwary et al., 2016).
In the present systematic review, we examine experimental studies that have been conducted with the aim to identify research evidences about the impact on cognitive and emotional skills of video games training in the healthy adult population. The large number of papers (1,423) identified using our search terms confirmed that there has been a surge of interest in the use of games for the aforementioned specific population, following the tendency already registered about elders (e.g., Lampit et al., 2014), and young people (e.g., Gomes et al., 2015). After the application of the inclusion criteria, 35 papers were finally included and described on the basis of important previous works, which provide a useful framework for organizing the research along key variables (Connolly et al., 2012; Kueider et al., 2012; Boyle et al., 2016).
With respect to video game variables, starting from the games' category, efficacy was demonstrated not only for non-commercial video games or commercial brain-training programs, but for commercial off-the-shelf video games as well. Interesting cases regard Tetris, which resulted to be more effective than a commercial brain training program (i.e., Brain Age) in improving cognitive skills such as short-term memory and processing speed (Nouchi et al., 2013), and Portal 2, that has proven to be effective in improving skills such as problem solving even more effectively than a brain training program specifically developed for this purpose (i.e., Lumosity) (Shute et al., 2015). The fact that not only ad hoc non-commercial games, but also commercial video games can be useful for training cognitive and emotional capacities, if confirmed, appears to be very interesting, as it opens the possibility to use commercial titles for the training of cognitive and emotional abilities in the adult population. This could mean increasing adherence to training, keeping the trainee engaged with an effective feedback system (Cowley et al., 2008), and enhancing the accessibility of training programs in terms of costs and ease of access to treatment, since it would be sufficient to simply have a console or another gaming device.
As for the distribution of game genre, considering only commercial games, in the emotional training sector no genre prevalence is recorded, while in cognitive training action games are the most commonly used, followed by puzzle games, and by brain training games. Such result should not be considered surprising, as previous literature indicates action games as the class of video games which has been scientifically assessed for the longest time (e.g., Adachi and Willoughby, 2011), similarly to puzzle games (e.g., Carvalho et al., 2012), and brain training games (e.g., Owen et al., 2010).
Results showed that the delivery platform of choice for more than half of the included studies was the PC, distantly followed by games delivered via consoles or via mobile. This distribution is valid for both commercial and non-commercial games, which seems to be a rather interesting fact and various reasons behind this consistency of distribution can be hypothesized. Future studies should better investigate especially mobile training, which, because of its potential ubiquity, its low costs, and its potentially real-time use, could offer unique advantages over traditional tools such as PCs.
Regarding the variables related to the studies, namely the sample characteristics, the results of this systematic review showed that the majority of studies have been conducted on young adults (18–35 years) rather than middle-aged adults (35–55 years). A possible explanation of this tendency could be linked to the fact that many studies have enlisted college students as participants, for a matter of simplicity of recruitment. However, it is important to note that the differentiation between young and middle-aged adults can be particularly relevant. As it is reported by scientific literature, in fact, the effects of the so-called inverted U curve of neuroplasticity and cognitive performance and of the perceived stress starts to be evident during the middle-age (Cao et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2015). Moreover, strong differences in terms of knowledge and use of video games characterize these two age ranges. For these reasons, future studies should better investigate differences and analogies between young and middle-aged adults, for instance to identify in which life-span moment a game-based cognitive or emotional treatment would potentially be more effective.
Secondly, regarding the experimental design adopted in the studies, results show that in the majority of cases studies were conducted using a RCT design. This seems to be linked to the need for evidences of well-controlled studies, differently from previous studies in which less strong methods (e.g., survey, correlational design) were used. It will be important for future studies to continue using this type of experimental design, which is considered as the most reliable empirical design in order to prove a treatment's effectiveness, minimizing the impact of confounding variables (Levin, 2007).
The measures of outcome of the training adopted in the studies included in this systematic review predictably have largely been constituted by cognitive tests (e.g., Blacker et al., 2014). Nonetheless, numerous studies have included self-administered psychological questionnaires (e.g., Nouchi et al., 2013), physiological measures (e.g., Naugle et al., 2014), EEG-based assessment measures (e.g., Dennis-Tiwary et al., 2016), and fMRI-based assessments measures (e.g., Kable et al., 2017), which seem to be more reliable in assessing change over time, therefore an openness to such ways of assessment is desirable in a perspective of empirical evidence.
The length of the training programs proposed by studies included in this systematic review resulted to be rather heterogeneous, both in the number of sessions and in the number of weeks: from a minimum of one session (e.g., Colzato et al., 2013; Cherney et al., 2014) to a maximum of 60 sessions (Kühn et al., 2014), and with gameplay time ranging from 10 min to 50 h (Green et al., 2012; Chandra et al., 2016). Since the duration and intensity of training has been reported to be a relevant variable, as it has a rather important impact on the accessibility and feasibility of the training itself (Hempel et al., 2004), future studies should address in detail such aspects of the training, for instance comparing the effectiveness of shorter trainings to longer ones in order to identify the minimum number of sessions to obtain an effective program.
Finally, regarding the training outcome, based on this review, video games appear to hold promise for improving both cognitive and emotional skills in the healthy adult population. Empirical evidences were identified for all the training outcomes (i.e., cognition: multiple domain, processing speed and RTs, memory, task-switching/multitasking, mental spatial rotation; emotion).
Effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cognitive training, in general, ranged from 0.06 to 3.43: in particular from 0.141 to 3.43 for processing and RTs, 0.06 to 1.82 for memory, 0.54 to 1.91 for task-switching/multitasking, and 0.3 to 3.2 for mental spatial rotation (Table S1). Effect sizes reported in this systematic review are comparable to those reported for video game interventions aimed at enhancing cognitive skills of senior populations (Kueider et al., 2012; Lampit et al., 2014). For instance, a systematic review of a computerized cognitive training with older adults reported a range standardized pre-post training gain from 0.09 to 1.70 after the video game intervention, which appears to be similar to the values emerged from the traditional (0.06–6.32) or computerized (0.19–7.14) trainings (Kueider et al., 2012).
Based on the studies reviewed, the largest impact of video game trainings for cognitive skills was found on processing speed and RTs, as these cognitive domains presented the larger effect sizes. In particular, it has been observed that training with action games (Green et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014), FPS games (Colzato et al., 2013; Hutchinson et al., 2016), adventure (Li et al., 2016), and puzzle games (Stroud and Whitbourne, 2015) can enhance these skills in healthy adults. In only one case no benefits have been reported over these particular skills after training with commercial video games (van Ravenzwaaij et al., 2014). The possibility to train processing speed and RTs with video games, especially with action video games, represents one of the largest interests of video game and cognitive training literature in spite of mixed results about its effectiveness (e.g., Dye et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2016), therefore further investigation is surely needed. For instance, action video game novices assigned to action video game training show faster visual information processing according to one study (Castel et al., 2005), while no improvement has been reported for seniors involved in a brief training (Seçer and Satyen, 2014).
Results were generally positive across studies on training of memory as well. In particular, improvements in visual and spatial working memory have been observed after training with an action game (e.g., Blacker et al., 2014), an adventure game (Clemenson and Stark, 2015), and a non-commercial game (Looi et al., 2016). Concerning other forms of memory, a positive effect of an adventure game-based training on mnemonic discrimination was reported in one study (Clemenson and Stark, 2015), while improvements in short term memory skills have been noticed after a brain training program (Nouchi et al., 2013). On the contrary, no positive effects on episodic memory nor on visual and spatial working memory have been reported after training with puzzle games (Baniqued et al., 2014). What emerged from the studies included in this review appears to be in line with previous evidences concerning the possibility to effectively use video games to enhance the memory skills of young and older populations, in particular regarding visual and spatial working memory (e.g., Wilms et al., 2013; Toril et al., 2014). It is nonetheless important to highlight the fact that, in this systematic review and in previous literature, the efficacy (or the ineffectiveness) of each training seems to differ on the basis of the specific game genre, as well as of the sample characteristics (e.g., Baniqued et al., 2013; Oei and Patterson, 2015; Chandra et al., 2016). Future studies are therefore necessary in order to better investigate the role of video games in such sense.
Regarding mental spatial rotation, even though the effect sizes are averagely high, only two studies have been included in this review, therefore results should be considered in the context of such numerical limitation. From what emerged from this systematic review, an enhancement of mental spatial rotation abilities was reported after training with commercial exergames and driving-racing games, with a greater advance for women (Cherney et al., 2014), while no improvement was observed after training with other commercial games (one exergame and several action games) (Dominiak and Wiemeyer, 2016). Since early findings in this research field have reported evidences supporting an enhanced performance in spatial relations after video game training in elders (e.g., Maillot et al., 2012) and children (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 1994), future studies should deeply verify the possible usefulness of video games as training of such cognitive skill in adults specifically.
As for task-switching/multitasking, in spite of high effect sizes suggesting the effectiveness of video game trainings in such sense, it is once again important to underline the limited number of considered studies (three). According to the included studies, the cost of dual tasking and the cost of task-switching decreased after training with a commercial puzzle game (Oei and Patterson, 2014), as well as with a custom-made video game (Montani et al., 2014; Parong et al., 2017). The use of video games for such purpose, because of their own nature of requiring complex planning and strategizing, appears to be rather significant, as it could potentially allow training or rehabilitation of these cognitive skills (e.g., Boot et al., 2008). Literature, nonetheless, still presents mixed results, not always positive (e.g., Green et al., 2012), and for this reason future studies providing an in-depth analysis are still necessary.
Finally, regarding video games for the training of emotional skills, effect sizes ranged from 0.201 to 3.01. Despite the generally high values, it is currently impossible to compare them with results emerged from other systematic reviews or meta-analyses concerning the same topic, as the few works around the subject do not provide any information about effect sizes (e.g., Villani et al., 2018). The studies included in this review provide evidences suggesting that non-commercial video games (Dennis and O'Toole, 2014; Dennis-Tiwary et al., 2016) and commercial video games (exergames and horror games) can be effective in inducing positive emotions and in reducing individual levels of stress in healthy adults (Bouchard et al., 2012; Naugle et al., 2014). From this review, it appears that the number of studies conducted about this kind of training is smaller than the amount of studies related to cognitive training. This fact is rather curious, because the video games' intrinsic characteristics of being motivating, engaging, and easily accessible (Granic et al., 2014), make computer games potentially useful tools in order to better the individuals' emotion regulation. Future studies will be fundamental in order to explore the potentiality of video games as emotional training tools, and to identify the most effective game genres for this purpose, examining potentially interesting genres that have not been investigated yet (e.g., affective gaming, virtual reality-based gaming).
As with all literature reviews, the current review does not claim to be comprehensive, but summarizes the current research on video games for the cognitive and the emotional training in the adult population based on specific key words used in the search string, the database included and the time period of the review. Moreover, in this review we based our choice of categories on a specific model (Connolly et al., 2012; Kueider et al., 2012; Boyle et al., 2016), however the level of specificity and distinctiveness of different categories is an ongoing discussion in the scientific world, both in relation with the outcomes of cognitive and emotive trainings, and with analyzing video games. Finally, the follow-up effect of video games training was not specifically addressed in this review, since a very limited number of studies provided follow-up tests.
The present systematic review provides several directions for future studies in this research field. First of all, further studies are needed to better examine the video games effects on cognitive and emotional skills, especially in middle age adults, population which has been investigated in a limited number of studies. Secondly, one of the biggest unresolved issues appears to be the generalizability of improvements: up to now, only short-term effects and specific improvements have been recorded in most studies (e.g., Hardy et al., 2015; Tárrega et al., 2015). In addition, video game characteristics (e.g., genre, platform) in relation with trained skills should be further investigated in the future, in order to create specific and effective training programs.
To summarize, the present systematic review gives evidences of benefits of video game trainings on cognitive and emotional skills in relation to the healthy adult population, especially on young adults. Efficacy has been demonstrated not only for non-commercial video games or commercial brain-training programs, but for commercial video games as well. As for the distribution of game genre, action games are the most commonly used, followed by puzzle games. Finally, in this review, empirical evidences were identified for all the training outcomes, showing the potential effectiveness of video games for the training of both cognitive (i.e., multiple domain, processing speed and RTs, memory, task-switching/multitasking, mental spatial rotation), and emotional skills.
FP, AF, and FM conceived the idea of this systematic review. FP and AF examined and write the description of the studies included. FM supervised the scientific asset. FP and AF write the first draft of the paper. All the authors read and approve the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02127/full#supplementary-material
Aker, Ç., Rizvanoglu, K., Inal, Y., and Yilmaz, A. S. (2016). “Analyzing playability in multi-platform games: a case study of the Fruit Ninja Game,” in Design, User Experience, and Usability: Novel User Experiences. DUXU 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, Vol. 9747, ed A. Marcus (Cham: Springer), 229–239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40355-7_22
Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 136, 151–173. doi: 10.1037/a0018251
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., and Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288, 2271–2281. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271
Baniqued, P. L., Kranz, M. B., Voss, M. W., Lee, H., Cosman, J. D., Severson, J., et al. (2014). Cognitive training with casual video games: points to consider. Front. Psychol. 4:1010. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01010
Baniqued, P. L., Lee, H., Voss, M. W., Basak, C., Cosman, J. D., DeSouza, S., et al. (2013). Selling points: what cognitive abilities are tapped by casual video games? Acta Psychol. (Amst). 142, 74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.009
Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., Green, C. S., and Bavelier, D. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychol. Bull. 144, 77–110. doi: 10.1037/bul0000130
Blacker, K. J., Curby, K. M., Klobusicky, E., and Chein, J. M. (2014). Effects of action video game training on visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 1992–2004. doi: 10.1037/a0037556
Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., and Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 129, 387–398. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
Bouchard, S., Bernier, F., Boivin, E., Morin, B., and Robillard, G. (2012). Using biofeedback while immersed in a stressful videogame increases the effectiveness of stress management skills in soldiers. PLoS ONE 7:e36169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036169
Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., et al. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 94, 178–192. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003
Cao, M., Wang, J. H., Dai, Z. J., Cao, X. Y., Jiang, L. L., Fan, F. M., et al. (2014). Topological organization of the human brain functional connectome across the lifespan. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 7, 76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.11.004
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., and Drummond, E. (2005). The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 119, 217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.02.004
Choi, H., and Lane, S. A. (2013). Impact of visuospatial characteristics of video games on improvements in cognitive abilities. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 57, 1735–1739. doi: 10.1177/1541931213571387
Clemenson, G. D., and Stark, C. E. (2015). Virtual environmental enrichment through video games improves hippocampal-associated memory. J. Neurosci. 35, 16116–16125. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2580-15.2015
Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., and Hommel, B. (2013). Cognitive control and the COMT Val158Met polymorphism: genetic modulation of videogame training and transfer to task-switching efficiency. Psychol. Res. 78, 670–678. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0514-8
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., and Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59, 661–686. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
Dennis-Tiwary, T. A., Egan, L. J., Babkirk, S., and Denefrio, S. (2016). For whom the bell tolls: neurocognitive individual differences in the acute stress-reduction effects of an attention bias modification game for anxiety. Behav. Res. Ther. 77, 105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.008
Dominiak, A., and Wiemeyer, J. (2016). “Training of spatial competencies by means of gesture-controlled sports games,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Computer Science in Sports (ISCSS). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 392, eds P. Chung, A. Soltoggio, C. Dawson, Q. Meng, and M. Pain (Cham: Springer), 243–249. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24560-7_31
Dove, A., Pollmann, S., Schubert, T., Wiggins, C. J., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 9, 103–109. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00029-4
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., and Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol. Methods 1, 170–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
Entertainment Software Assotiation (2015). 2015 Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 4, 1–20. Available online at: http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ESA-Essential-Facts-2015.pdf
Fleming, T. M., Bavin, L., Stasiak, K., Hermansson-Webb, E., Merry, S. N., Cheek, C., et al. (2016). Serious games and gamification for mental health: current status and promising directions. Front. Psychiatry 7:215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00215
Gabbiadini, A., and Greitemeyer, T. (2017). Uncovering the association between strategy video games and self-regulation: a correlational study. Pers. Individ. Dif. 104, 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.041
Gomes, E. L., Carvalho, C. R., Peixoto-Souza, F. S., Teixeira-Carvalho, E. F., Mendonca, J. F., Stirbulov, R., et al. (2015). Active video game exercise training improves the clinical control of asthma in children: randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10:e0135433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135433
Green, C. S., and Bavelier, D. (2006). Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 1465–1478. doi: 10.1037/0096-15184.108.40.2065
Green, C. S., Sugarman, M. A., Medford, K., Klobusicky, E., and Bavelier, D. (2012). The effect of action video game experience on task-switching. Comput. Human Behav. 28, 984–994. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.020
Hardy, J. L., Nelson, R. A., Thomason, M. E., Sternberg, D. A., Katovich, K., Farzin, F., et al. (2015). Enhancing cognitive abilities with comprehensive training: a large, online, randomized, active-controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10:e0134467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134467
Hempel, A., Giesel, F. L., Garcia Caraballo, N. M., Amann, M., Meyer, H., Wüstenberg, T., et al. (2004). Plasticity of cortical activation related to working memory during training. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 745–747. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.745
Jones, C. M., Scholes, L., Johnson, D., Katsikitis, M., and Carras, M. C. (2014). Gaming well: links between videogames and flourishing mental health. Front. Psychol. 5:260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00260
Kable, J. W., Caulfield, M. K., Falcone, M., McConnell, M., Bernardo, L., Parthasarathi, T., et al. (2017). No effect of commercial cognitive training on brain activity, choice behavior, or cognitive performance. J. Neurosci. 37, 7390–7402. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2832-16.2017
Kudielkaa, B. M., Buske-Kirschbaumb, A., and Kirschbaum, C. (2004). HPA axis responses to laboratory psychosocial stress in healthy elderly adults, younger adults, and children: impact of age and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29, 83–98. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(02)00146-4
Kühn, S., Gleich, T., Lorenz, R. C., Lindenberger, U., and Gallinat, J. (2014). Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 265–271. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.120
Lampit, A., Hallock, H., and Valenzuela, M. (2014). Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 11:e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756
Lee, H., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., Boot, W. R., Vo, L. T., Basak, C., et al. (2012). Videogame training strategy-induced change in brain function during a complex visuomotor task. Behav. Brain Res. 232, 348–357. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.043
Looi, C. Y., Duta, M., Brem, A.-K., Huber, S., Nuerk, H.-C., and Cohen Kadosh, R. (2016). Combining brain stimulation and video game to promote long-term transfer of learning and cognitive enhancement. Sci. Rep. 6:22003. doi: 10.1038/srep22003
Lumsden, J., Edwards, E. A., Lawrence, N. S., Coyle, D., and Munaf,ò, M. R. (2016). Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: a systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games, 4:e11. doi: 10.2196/games.5888
Maillot, P., Perrot, A., and Hartley, A. (2012). Effects of interactive physical-activity video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults. Psychol. Aging 27, 589–600. doi: 10.1037/a0026268
Mathewson, K. E., Basak, C., Maclin, E. L., Low, K. A., Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., et al. (2012). Different slopes for different folks: alpha and delta EEG power predict subsequent video game learning rate and improvements in cognitive control tasks. Psychophysiology 49, 1558–1570. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01474.x
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Montani, V., De Filippo De Grazia, M., and Zorzi, M. (2014). A new adaptive videogame for training attention and executive functions: design principles and initial validation. Front. Psychol. 5:409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00409
Nikolaidis, A., Voss, M. W., Lee, H., Vo, L. T. K., and Kramer, A. F. (2014). Parietal plasticity after training with a complex video game is associated with individual differences in improvements in an untrained working memory task. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:169. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00169
Nouchi, R., Taki, Y., Takeuchi, H., Hashizume, H., Nozawa, T., Kambara, T., et al. (2013). Brain training game boosts executive functions, working memory and processing speed in the young adults: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 8:e55518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055518
Oei, A. C., and Patterson, M. D. (2015). Enhancing perceptual and attentional skills requires common demands between the action video games and transfer tasks. Front. Psychol. 6:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00113
Parong, J., Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., MacNamara, A., Homer, B. D., and Plass, J. L. (2017). Learning executive function skills by playing focused video games. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 51, 141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.07.002
Peretz, C., Korczyn, A. D., Shatil, E., Aharonson, V., Birnboim, S., and Giladi, N. (2011). Computer-based, personalized cognitive training versus classical computer games: a randomized double-blind prospective trial of cognitive stimulation. Neuroepidemiology 36, 91–99. doi: 10.1159/000323950
Rebok, G. W., Carlson, M. C., and Langbaum, J. B. S. (2007). Training and maintaining memory abilities in healthy older adults: traditional and novel approaches. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 62 Spec No 1, 53–61. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.53
Rolle, C. E., Anguera, J. A., Skinner, S. N., Voytek, B., and Gazzaley, A. (2017). Enhancing spatial attention and working memory in younger and older adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 1483–1497. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01159
Schubert, T., Finke, K., Redel, P., Kluckow, S., Müller, H., and Strobach, T. (2015). Video game experience and its influence on visual attention parameters: an investigation using the framework of the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA). Acta Psychol. 157, 200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.03.005
Shanahan, M. A., Pennington, B. F., Yerys, B. E., Scott, A., Boada, R., Willcutt, E. G., et al. (2006). Processing speed deficits in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 34, 584–601. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9037-8
Stanmore, E., Stubbs, B., Vancampfort, D., de Bruin, E. D., and Firth, J. (2017). The effect of active video games on cognitive functioning in clinical and non-clinical populations: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 78, 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.011
Stern, Y., Blumen, H. M., Rich, L. W., Richards, A., Herzberg, G., and Gopher, D. (2011). Space Fortress game training and executive control in older adults: a pilot intervention. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 18, 653–677. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.613450
Stroud, M. J., and Whitbourne, S. K. (2015). Casual video games as training tools for attentional processes in everyday life. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 18, 654–660. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0316
Tárrega, S., Castro-Carreras, L., Fernández-Aranda, F., Granero, R., Giner-Bartolomé, C., Aymamí, N., et al. (2015). A serious videogame as an additional therapy tool for training emotional regulation and impulsivity control in severe gambling disorder. Front. Psychol. 6:1721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01721
Thalheimer, W., and Cook, S. (2002). How to Calculate Effect Sizes from Published Research Articles: A Simplified Methodology. Available online at: http://www.work-learning.com/
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., and Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 1794–1805. doi: 10.1037/a0036923
Wang, D. D., Dan, R., and Schard, J. (2014). “Training with action-video games and attentional resources: effect of video game playing on a flanker task,” in International Conference on Humanity and Social Science (Guangzhou: ICHSS 2014), 170–174.
Wang, P., Liu, H.-H., Zhu, X.-T., Meng, T., Li, H.-J., and Zuo, X.-N. (2016). Action video game training for healthy adults: a meta-analytic study. Front. Psychol. 7:907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00907
Wilms, I. L., Petersen, A., and Vangkilde, S. (2013). Intensive video gaming improves encoding speed to visual short-term memory in young male adults. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 142, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.003
Yeh, M., Wickens, C. D., Merlo, M. A. J., and Brandenburg, D. L. (2001). “Head-up vs. head-down: effects of precision on cue effectiveness and display signaling,” in 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (St. Paul, MN), 1–6.
Zhao, T., Cao, M., Niu, H., Zuo, X. N., Evans, A., He, Y., et al. (2015). Age-related changes in the topological organization of the white matter structural connectome across the human lifespan. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 3777–3792 doi: 10.1002/hbm.22877
Keywords: video games, computer games, cognitive training, emotional training, well-being
Citation: Pallavicini F, Ferrari A and Mantovani F (2018) Video Games for Well-Being: A Systematic Review on the Application of Computer Games for Cognitive and Emotional Training in the Adult Population. Front. Psychol. 9:2127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02127
Received: 13 June 2018; Accepted: 15 October 2018;
Published: 07 November 2018.
Edited by:M.-Carmen Juan, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
Reviewed by:Stephen Fairclough, Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Karmele López-de-Ipiña, Universidad del País Vasco, Spain
Magdalena Mendez-Lopez, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain
Copyright © 2018 Pallavicini, Ferrari and Mantovani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Federica Pallavicini, firstname.lastname@example.org