In the original article, there was an error. The life-time prevalence of IPV in heterosexual women was incorrectly provided.
A correction has been made to the Introduction, paragraph three:
“Life-time prevalence of IPV in LGB couples appeared to be similar to or higher than in heterosexual ones: 61.1% of bisexual women, 43.8% of lesbian women, 37.3% of bisexual men, and 26.0% of homosexual men experienced IPV during their life, while 35.0% of heterosexual women and 29.0% of heterosexual men experienced IPV. When episodes of severe violence were considered, prevalence was similar or higher for LGB adults (bisexual women: 49.3%; lesbian women: 29.4%; homosexual men: 16.4%) compared to heterosexual adults (heterosexual women: 23.6%; heterosexual men: 13.9%) (Breiding et al., 2013).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
1
BreidingM. J.ChenJ.WaltersM. L. (2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Findings of Victimization by Sexual Orientation. Atlanta, GA: National center for injury prevention and control.
Summary
Keywords
same sex intimate partner violence, same-sex couple, LGB, domestic violence, IPV, treatment
Citation
Rollè L, Giardina G, Caldarera AM, Gerino E and Brustia P (2019) Corrigendum: When Intimate Partner Violence Meets Same Sex Couples: A Review of Same Sex Intimate Partner Violence. Front. Psychol. 10:1706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01706
Received
25 June 2019
Accepted
08 July 2019
Published
19 July 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited and reviewed by
Pedro Alexandre Costa, University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences, Portugal
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Rollè, Giardina, Caldarera, Gerino and Brustia.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giulia Giardina giulia.giardina@edu.unito.it
This article was submitted to Gender, Sex and Sexuality Studies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.