Corrigendum: Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis

Peña-Sarrionandia, Ainize; Mikolajczak, Moïra; Gross, James J.

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02610

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 27 November 2019

Sec. Educational Psychology

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02610

Corrigendum: Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis

Ainize Peña-Sarrionandia ¹

Moïra Mikolajczak ²^*

James J. Gross ³

1. Faculty of Psychology, Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, University of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
2. Department of Psychology, Research Unit for Emotion Cognition and Health, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
3. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Article metrics

View details

Citations

4,2k

Views

1,6k

Downloads

This article is a correction to:

Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis
1. Read original article

A Corrigendum on Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis by Peña-Sarrionandia, A., Mikolajczak, M., and Gross, J. J. (2015). Front. Psychol. 6:160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00160

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. In Goldenberg's study, measuring the relationship between ability EI and social support, r appears as 0.42, CI (lower bound) as 0.31, CI (upper bound) as 0.52, and d as 0.92. However, r should be 0.04, CI (lower bound) −0.09, CI (upper bound) 0.17, and d 0.08. The corrected Table 1 appears below.

Table 1

Authors	N	ER Family	Specific variable	T/A	Measure used	Facet	r	CI r (lower bound)	CI r (upper bound)	d
Schutte et al., 2009	73	SS	Situation selection	T	AES		0.30	0.08	0.49	0.63
Ciarrochi et al., 2002	302	SS	Daily hassles	T	EIS		−0.01	−0.12	0.10	−0.02
Day et al., 2005	133	SS	Daily hassles	T	EQ-I	AGS	−0.43	−0.51	−0.27	−0.94
Kim and Agrusa, 2011	385	SS	Avoidant coping	T	WLEIS		0.15	0.05	0.25	0.30
Shah and Thingujam, 2008	197	SS	Avoidant coping	T	EIS	AGS	−0.08	−0.22	0.06	−0.16
Rogers et al., 2006	253	SS	Avoidant coping	T	SREIT		−0.04	−0.16	0.08	−0.08
Velasco et al., 2006	593	SS	Avoidant coping	T	TMMS-alex F1		−0.16	−0.24	−0.08	−0.32
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1)	166	SS	Avoidant coping	T	modified EQ-i		−0.34	−0.47	−0.20	−0.72
Petrides et al., 2007a (study2 sample1)	200	SS	Avoidant coping	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.39	−0.50	−0.27	−0.84
Petrides et al., 2007b	274	SS	Avoidant coping	T	TEIQue-LF		0.01	−0.11	0.13	0.02
MacCann et al., 2011	159	SS	Avoidant coping	A	MSCEIT	AGS	−0.21	−0.35	−0.06	−0.43
Gerits et al., 2004	380	SS	Avoidant coping	T	EQ-i		−0.23	−0.32	−0.13	−0.47
Monaci et al., 2013	198	SS	Avoidant coping	T	SEIS		0.01	−0.13	0.15	0.02
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a	490	SS	Avoidant coping	T	TEIQue-ASF		−0.26	−0.34	−0.18	−0.54
Petrides et al., 2006a	37	SS	Perseverance	T	TEIQue-LF		0.53	0.25	0.74	1.25
Dunn et al., 2007	84	SS	Forecast accuracy	A	MSCEIT		−0.19	0.06	0.62	−0.38
Dunn et al., 2007	84	SS	Forecast accuracy	T	SREIS		−0.09	−0.39	0.02	−0.18
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1)	81	SS	Forecast accuracy	T	SEI/SREIS/TEIQue		0.22	−0.30	0.13	0.45
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1)	81	SS	Forecast accuracy	A	JET+IJI		0.36	−0.01	0.41	0.77
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2)	81	SS	Forecast accuracy	T	TEIQue-SF		0.27	0.16	0.54	0.56
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2)	81	SS	Forecast accuracy	A	JET+IJI+STEU		0.39	0.07	0.47	0.84
Schutte et al., 2001b	38	SS	Persistence	T	SEIS		0.37	0.19	0.56	0.79
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SS	Behavioral disengagement	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	−0.24	−0.35	−0.12	−0.49
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SS	Behavioral disengagement	A	MSCEIT		−0.16	−0.28	−0.04	−0.32
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005	365	SS	Time to relax	T	TEIQ		0.43	0.35	0.51	0.95
Schutte et al., 2009	73	SM	Modifying situations	T	EIS		0.20	−0.03	0.42	0.41
Moradi et al., 2011	200	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TMMS	R+C	0.27	0.14	0.40	0.56
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1)	166	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	modified EQ-i		0.57	0.46	0.67	1.38
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 2. sample 1)	200	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TEIQue-LF		0.67	0.59	0.75	1.80
Petrides et al., 2007b	274	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TEIQue-LF		0.64	0.57	0.71	1.66
MacCann et al., 2011	159	SM	Problem-focused coping	A	MSCEIT	AGS	0.14	−0.02	0.29	0.28
Shah and Thingujam, 2008	197	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	EIS	AGS	0.21	0.07	0.34	0.43
Goldenberg et al., 2006	223	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	SREIS		0.55	0.46	0.64	1.31
Goldenberg et al., 2006	223	SM	Problem-focused coping	A	MSCEIT		0.17	0.04	0.30	0.34
Kluemper, 2008	180	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	WLEIS		0.61	0.51	0.70	1.54
Rogers et al., 2006	253	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	SREIT		0.30	0.19	0.41	0.63
Mikolajczak et al., 2008	203	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TEIQue-LF		0.40	0.29	0.51	0.87
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3)	48	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TMMS	R+C	0.34	0.06	0.57	0.71
Saklofske et al., 2007	362	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	EIS		0.38	0.29	0.46	0.82
Almran and Punamaki, 2008	312	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	EQ-I:YV-S		0.25	0.14	0.36	0.51
Velasco et al., 2006	593	SM	Problem-focused coping	T	TMMS-alex F1		0.20	0.12	0.28	0.41
Rahim and Minors, 2003	222	SM	Problem solving	T	EQ-Index	AGS	0.44	0.33	0.54	0.98
Monaci et al., 2013	198	SM	Direct confrontation	T	SEIS		0.43	0.31	0.54	0.95
Montes-Berges and Augusto, 2007	119	SM	Active coping	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.05	−0.13	0.23	0.11
Gerits et al., 2004	380	SM	Active coping	T	EQ-I		0.38	0.29	0.46	0.82
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013	252	SM	Active coping	T	SREIS		0.45	0.34	0.54	1.01
Zomer, 2012	300	SM	Active coping	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.15	0.04	0.26	0.30
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Active coping + planning	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	0.40	0.28	0.51	0.87
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Active coping + planning	A	MSCEIT		0.05	−0.08	0.18	0.10
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Problem Solving Inventory	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	−0.43	−0.53	−0.32	−0.94
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Problem Solving Inventory	A	MSCEIT		−0.04	−0.17	0.09	−0.08
Austin et al., 2010	475	SM	Task-oriented coping	T	EQ:i-S	AGS	0.38	0.30	0.45	0.82
Saklofske et al., 2012	238	SM	Task-oriented coping	T	EQ:i S	AGS	0.48	0.38	0.57	1.09
Kim and Agrusa, 2011	385	SM	Task coping	T	WLEIS		0.54	0.46	0.61	1.28
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a	490	SM	Rational coping	T	TEIQue-ASF		0.46	0.39	0.53	1.03
Monaci et al., 2013	198	SM	Social support	T	SEIS		0.36	0.24	0.48	0.77
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Instrumental social support	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	0.24	0.11	0.35	0.49
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Instrumental social support	A	MSCEIT		0.06	−0.07	0.19	0.12
Zomer, 2012	300	SM	Support from others	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.11	0.00	0.22	0.21
Gerits et al., 2004	380	SM	Social support seeking	T	EQ-i		0.21	0.11	0.31	0.43
Shah and Thingujam, 2008	197	SM	Social support seeking	T	EIS	AGS	0.07	−0.08	0.21	0.13
Ciarrochi and Deane, 2001	300	SM	Social support seeking	T	EIS	AGS	0.15	0.05	0.25	0.26
Velasco et al., 2006	593	SM	Social support seeking	T	TMMS-alex F1		0.13	0.05	0.21	0.26
Goldenberg et al., 2006	223	SM	Social support seeking	T	SREIS		0.32	0.20	0.43	0.67
Goldenberg et al., 2006	223	SM	Social support seeking	A	MSCEIT		0.04	−0.09	0.17	0.08
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013	200	SM	Conflict res. (constructive)	A	MSCEIT		0.24	0.11	0.37	0.49
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013	200	SM	Conflict res. (avoidance)	A	MSCEIT		−0.39	−0.50	−0.26	−0.84
Jordan and Troth, 2004	350	SM	Conflict res. (integrate)	T	WEIP6		0.35	0.25	0.44	0.74
Jordan and Troth, 2004	350	SM	Conflict res. (avoid)	T	WEIP6		−0.12	−0.23	−0.01	−0.24
Jordan and Troth, 2004	350	SM	Conflict res. (dominate)	T	WEIP6		0.19	0.09	0.29	0.38
Jordan and Troth, 2002	139	SM	Conflict res. (collaborate)	T	WEIP6		0.53	0.40	0.64	1.25
Jordan and Troth, 2002	139	SM	Conflict res. (avoidance)	T	WEIP6		−0.12	−0.28	0.04	−0.24
Jordan and Troth, 2002	139	SM	Conflict resolution (force)	T	WEIP6		0.02	−0.15	0.19	0.04
Jordan and Troth, 2002	139	SM	Conflict res. (accommodate)	T	WEIP6		−0.08	−0.24	0.08	−0.01
Jordan and Troth, 2002	139	SM	Conflict res. (compromise)	T	WEIP6		0.09	−0.08	0.25	0.02
Salami, 2010b	320	SM	Conflict res. (confronting)	T	WLEIS		0.20	0.10	0.30	0.41
Salami, 2010b	320	SM	Conflict res. (withdrawal)	T	WLEIS		0.12	0.01	0.23	0.24
Salami, 2010b	320	SM	Conflict resolution (forcing)	T	WLEIS		0.12	0.01	0.23	0.24
Salami, 2010b	320	SM	Conflict res. (smoothe)	T	WLEIS		0.19	0.08	0.29	0.38
Salami, 2010b	320	SM	Conflict res. (compromise)	T	WLEIS		0.21	0.10	0.31	0.43
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Restraint	T	TMMS+AES		0.08	−0.05	0.21	0.16
Bastian et al., 2005	246	SM	Restraint	A	MSCEIT		−0.04	−0.17	0.09	−0.08
Schutte et al., 2009	73	AD	Attention deployment	T	EIS		0.38	0.17	0.56	0.82
Bastian et al., 2005	246	AD	Mental disengagement	T	TMMS+AES		−0.05	−0.18	0.08	−0.10
Bastian et al., 2005	246	AD	Mental disengagement	A	MSCEIT		−0.05	−0.18	0.08	−0.10
Mikolajczak et al., 2008	203	AD	Trait distraction	T	TEIQue-LF		0.41	0.29	0.52	0.89
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3)	48	AD	State distraction	T	TMMS	R+C	0.36	0.08	0.59	0.77
Saklofske et al., 2012	238	AD	Distraction	T	EQ-i: S		−0.11	−0.23	0.02	−0.21
Austin et al., 2010	475	AD	Distraction	T	EQ-i: S		0.18	0.09	0.27	0.37
Lanciano et al., 2012	157	AD	Dysfunctional rumination	A	MSCEIT	AGS	−0.44	−0.56	−0.30	−0.98
Petrides et al., 2007b	274	AD	Trait rumination	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.47	−0.56	−0.38	−1.06
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1)	166	AD	Trait rumination	T	modified EQ-i		−0.53	−0.64	−0.42	−1.25
Mikolajczak et al., 2008	203	AD	Trait Rumination	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.10	−0.24	0.04	−0.20
Ramos et al., 2007	144	AD	State rumination	T	TMMS	R+C	−0.11	−0.27	0.05	−0.21
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3)	48	AD	State rumination	T	TMMS	R+C	−0.27	−0.51	0.02	−0.55
Salguero et al., 2013	1154	AD	Rumination	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.11	−0.17	−0.05	−0.22
Brown and Ryan, 2003	645	AD	Mindful attention	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.40	0.33	0.46	0.87
Wang and Kong, 2014	321	AD	Mindful attention	T	WLEIS		0.33	0.23	0.42	0.70
Schutte and Malouff, 2011	125	AD	Mindful attention	T	AES		0.65	0.53	0.74	1.71
Kokinda, 2010	108	AD	Mindful attention	T	AES		0.47	0.31	0.63	1.06
Charoensukmongkol, 2014	317	AD	Mindful attention	T	WLEIS		0.32	0.22	0.42	0.68
Baer et al., 2004 (study 4)	130	AD	Mindful attention	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.24	0.07	0.40	0.49
Totterdell and Holman, 2003	18	AD	Focus on positive	T	EIS		0.46	−0.01	0.79	1.03
Schutte et al., 2009	73	CC	Cognitive change	T	AES		0.26	0.03	0.46	0.54
Charoensukmongkol, 2014	317	CC	Self-efficacy	T	WLEIS		0.68	0.61	0.74	1.86
Brown et al., 2003	288	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EII-R		0.25	0.14	0.36	0.50
Chan, 2004	158	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EIS		0.32	0.17	0.45	0.66
Martin et al., 2004	140	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EJI		0.54	0.41	0.65	1.27
Durán et al., 2006	373	CC	Self-efficacy	T	TMMS	R+C	0.34	0.24	0.42	0.72
Kaur et al., 2006	117	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EIS		0.42	0.26	0.56	0.92
Villanueva and Sanchez, 2007	70	CC	Self-efficacy	T	SSRI		0.36	0.13	0.54	0.77
Di Fabio and Palazzeschi, 2008	169	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EQ-i		0.34	0.20	0.47	0.72
Adeyemo, 2007	300	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EQ-i		0.17	0.06	0.28	0.34
Mikolajczak et al., 2006	95	CC	Self-efficacy	T	TEIQue-LF		0.66	0.53	0.76	1.75
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study1)	27	CC	Self-efficacy	T	TEIQue-LF		0.50	0.15	0.75	1.15
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2)	15	CC	Self-efficacy	T	TEIQue-SF		0.29	−0.27	0.70	0.60
Kirk et al., 2008	207	CC	Self-efficaccy	T	AES		0.73	0.66	0.79	2.13
Kirk et al., 2008	207	CC	Self-efficaccy	A	MSCEIT		0.34	0.22	0.46	0.72
Animasahun, 2008	300	CC	Self-efficacy	T	EIS		0.43	0.33	0.52	0.95
Salami, 2010a	242	CC	Self-efficacy	T	WLEIS		0.08	−0.05	0.21	0.16
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013	252	CC	Self-efficacy	T	SREIS		0.57	0.48	0.65	1.38
Mouton et al., 2013	119	CC	Self-efficacy	T	TEIQue		0.28	0.11	0.44	0.58
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b	164	CC	Core self-evaluation^a	T	TEIQue/EQ-i		0.56	0.45	0.65	1.35
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b	164	CC	Core self-evaluation	A	MSCEIT		0.02	−0.13	0.17	0.04
Kluemper, 2008	180	CC	Core self-evaluation	T	WLEIS		0.73	0.65	0.79	2.14
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a	194	CC	Self-Efficacy	A	MSCEIT		0.23	0.09	0.35	0.47
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a	194	CC	Self-Efficacy	T	EQ-i		0.67	0.58	0.74	1.80
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2)	15	CC	Ratio challenge/threat	T	TEIQue-SF		0.72	0.33	0.9	2.07
Mikolajczak et al., 2006	70	CC	Challenge appraisal	T	TEIQue-LF		0.02	−0.22	0.26	0.04
Mikolajczak et al., 2006	70	CC	Threat appraisal	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.41	−0.60	−0.20	−0.89
Schutte et al., 2009	73	CC	Reappraisal	T	AES		0.46	0.26	0.62	1.03
Shah and Thingujam, 2008	197	CC	Positive reappraisal	T	EIS	AGS	0.21	0.07	0.34	0.43
Mikolajczak et al., 2008	203	CC	Reappraisal	T	TEIQue-LF		0.46	0.34	0.56	1.03
Velasco et al., 2006	593	CC	Positive reappraisal	T	TMMS-alex F1		0.23	0.15	0.31	0.47
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007	475	CC	Reappraisal	T	EQ-I		0.04	−0.08	0.16	0.08
Cabello et al., 2013	866	CC	Reappraisal	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.34	0.28	0.40	0.72
Coumans, 2005	31	CC	Reappraisal	T	TEIQue-LF		0.02	−0.34	0.38	0.04
Totterdell and Holman, 2003	18	CC	Perspective taking	T	EIS		0.21	−0.29	0.62	0.43
Moradi et al., 2011	200	CC	Reappraisal	T	TMMS	R+C	0.45	0.34	0.56	1.01
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Positive interpretation	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	0.50	0.40	0.59	1.15
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Positive interpretation	A	MSCEIT		0.11	−0.02	0.24	0.21
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Adaptive Humour	T	TMMS+AES	R+C	0.14	0.01	0.26	0.28
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Adaptive Humour	A	MSCEIT		0.04	−0.09	0.17	0.08
Zomer, 2012	300	CC	Adaptive Humour	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.01	−0.10	0.12	0.02
Greven et al., 2008	1038	CC	Adaptive Humour	T	TEIQue-LF		0.45	0.40	0.50	0.99
Greven et al., 2008	1038	CC	Maladaptive Humour	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.27	−0.33	−0.21	−0.55
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013	252	CC	Denial	T	SREIS		−0.09	−0.21	0.03	−0.18
Zomer, 2012	300	CC	Denial	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.16	−0.27	−0.05	−0.32
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Denial	T	TMMS+AES		−0.15	−0.27	−0.02	−0.30
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Denial	A	MSCEIT		−0.20	−0.32	−0.08	−0.41
Zomer, 2012	300	CC	Acceptance	T	TMMS-24	R+C	0.09	−0.02	0.20	0.17
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Acceptance	T	TMMS+AES		0.38	0.26	0.48	0.82
Bastian et al., 2005	246	CC	Acceptance	A	MSCEIT		0.10	−0.03	0.23	0.21
Mikolajczak et al., 2008	203	CC	Acceptance	T	TEIQue-LF		−0.06	−0.20	0.08	−0.12
Bastian et al., 2005	246	RM	Venting	T	TMMS+AES		0.05	−0.08	0.18	0.10
Bastian et al., 2005	246	RM	Venting	A	MSCEIT		0.02	−0.11	0.15	0.03
Zomer, 2012	300	RM	Venting	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.27	−0.37	−0.16	−0.56
Schutte et al., 2009	73	RM	suppression (ERQ)	T	EIS		−0.50	−0.66	−0.31	−1.15
Johnson and Spector, 2007	176	RM	Suppression	T	WLEIS		−0.08	−0.23	0.07	−0.16
Austin et al., 2008	247	RM	Suppression	T	TEIQue-SF		−0.45	−0.55	−0.35	−1.01
Mikolajczak et al., 2007b	124	RM	Suppression	T	TEIQue-SF		−0.31	−0.46	−0.14	−0.65
Totterdell and Holman, 2003	18	RM	Suppression	T	EIS		−0.18	−0.60	0.31	−0.36
Velasco et al., 2006	593	RM	Suppression	T	TMMS-alex F1		−0.28	−0.35	−0.21	−0.58
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007	475	RM	Suppression (ERQ)	T	EQ-I		−0.08	−0.20	0.04	−0.16
Cabello et al., 2013	866	RM	Suppression	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.13	−0.20	−0.06	−0.26
Lee and Ok, 2012	309	RM	Emotional dissonance	T	WLEIS		−0.22	−0.33	−0.11	−0.45
Rivers et al., 2013	243	RM	Aggressive behavior	A	MSCEIT		−0.25	−0.36	−0.13	−0.51
Brackett et al., 2004	330	RM	Deviant behavior	A	MSCEIT		−0.27	−0.37	−0.17	−0.56
Brackett and Mayer, 2003	207	RM	Social deviance	T	EQ-i/SREIT		−0.14	−0.27	0.00	−0.28
Shahzad et al., 2013	140	RM	Aggression	T	TEIQue-ASF		−0.31	−0.45	−0.15	−0.64
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a	490	RM	Self-harm	T	TEIQue-ASF		−0.31	−0.39	−0.23	−0.65
Karim and Shah, 2014	192	RM	Suicidal ideation	A	MSCEIT	AGS	−0.30	−0.42	−0.16	−0.63
Aradilla-Herrero et al., 2014	93	RM	Suicide risk	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.21	−0.40	−0.01	−0.43
Gardner et al., 2014	235	RM	Bulimic symptoms	T	MEIA		−0.22	−0.34	−0.10	−0.45
Gardner et al., 2014	235	RM	Bulimic symptoms	A	MSCEIT		−0.07	−0.20	0.06	−0.14
Gardner et al., 2014	235	RM	Binge eating	T	MEIA		−0.21	−0.33	−0.08	−0.43
Gardner et al., 2014	235	RM	Binge eating	A	MSCEIT		−0.03	−0.16	0.10	−0.06
Pettit et al., 2010	402	RM	Bulimia/Food preocupation	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.13	−0.23	−0.03	−0.26
Markey and Vander Wal, 2007	154	RM	Bulimic symptoms	T	EQ- i:S		−0.31	−0.45	−0.16	−0.65
Brackett et al., 2004	330	RM	Illegal drug use	A	MSCEIT		−0.11	−0.22	0.00	−0.22
Brackett et al., 2004	330	RM	Alcohol use	A	MSCEIT		−0.13	−0.24	−0.02	−0.26
Rossen and Kranzler, 2009	150	RM	Alcohol use	A	MSCEIT		−0.21	−0.35	−0.07	−0.43
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005	365	RM	Alcohol units	T	TEIQ		−0.07	−0.17	0.03	−0.14
Austin et al., 2005	115	RM	Acohol consumption	T	REIS		−0.19	−0.37	−0.01	−0.38
Ghee and Johnson, 2008	214	RM	Alcohol consumption	T	EIS		−0.02	−0.15	0.11	−0.04
Riley and Schutte, 2003	141	RM	Acohol consumption	T	EIS		−0.34	−0.48	−0.2	−0.72
Brackett and Mayer, 2003	207	RM	Alcohol consumption	T	EQ-i/SREIT		−0.13	−0.26	0.01	−0.26
Trinidad and Johnson, 2002	205	RM	Alcohol consumption	A	MEIS		−0.12	−0.26	0.01	−0.25
Saklofske et al., 2007	362	RM	Alcohol consumption	T	EIS		−0.05	−0.15	0.05	−0.10
Brackett and Mayer, 2003	207	RM	Illegal drug user scale	T	EQ-i/SREIT		−0.14	−0.27	−0.003	−0.28
Riley and Schutte, 2003	141	RM	Drug abuse	T	EIS		−0.42	−0.55	−0.29	−0.92
Limonero et al., 2006	133	RM	Canabis smoking	T	TMMS	R+C	−0.01	−0.19	0.16	−0.02
Bastian et al., 2005	246	RM	Substance use	T	TMMS+AES		−0.05	−0.18	0.08	−0.10
Bastian et al., 2005	246	RM	Substance use	A	MSCEIT		−0.02	−0.14	0.11	−0.03
Rivers et al., 2013	243	RM	Substance abuse	A	MSCEIT		−0.18	−0.31	−0.06	−0.36
Schutte et al., 2011	100	RM	Alcohol problems	A	MSCEIT		−0.30	−0.46	−0.11	−0.63
Schutte et al., 2011	100	RM	Alcohol problems	T	AES		−0.27	−0.45	−0.08	−0.56
Zomer, 2012	300	RM	Drugs	T	TMMS-24	R+C	−0.11	−0.22	0.00	0.21
Monaci et al., 2013	198	RM	Alcohol use	T	SEIS		−0.05	−0.19	0.09	−0.10
Solanki and Lane, 2010	315	RM	Exercise mood regulating	T	EIS		0.45	0.35	0.53	1.01

Linking emotional intelligence to the use of emotion regulation strategies.

SS, Situation Selection; SM, Situation Modification; AD, Attentional Deployment; CC, Cognitive Change; RM, Response Modulation; T/A, Trait or Ability EI measure: T, trait EI measure, A, ability EI measure; AGS, Aggregated Global Score; R+C, Repair + Clarity; AES, Assessing Emotions Scale; EIS, Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-i/YV/S, Emotional Quotient Inventory/Young Version/Short; WLEIS, The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIT, Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test; TMMS-24, Trait Meta Mood Scale; TEIQ, The Traits Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire; TEIQue/SF/LF/ASF, Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire/ Short-Form/Long-Form/Adolescent Short-Form; MSCEIT, The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test; SEIS, Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIS, Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-Index, Emotional Quotient Index; WEIP6, Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile-Version 6; EII-R, Emotional Intelligence Inventory Revised; MEIS, Multifactoral Emotional Intelligence Scale; EJI, Emotional Judgment Inventory; SSRI, Schutte Self-Report Inventory; MEIA, Multidimensional Emotional Intelligence Assessment; REIS, Revised Emotional Intelligence Scale; SEI, Survey of Emotional Intelligence. JET, Judgment of Emotions Test; IJI, Interpersonal Judgment Inventory; STEU, Situational Test of Emotional Understanding.

^*The forecast accuracy indices were calculated such that higher numbers indicate poorer accuracy.

The core self-evaluation construct is a fundamental part of self-evaluated values, efficacy and abilities. It includes self-esteem, self-efficacy, internal locus of control and absence of pessimism.

As a consequence of the first mistake (r in Goldenberg's study was not 0.42, but 0.04), in the original article there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. The d related to Social support seeking was 0.50 in the original article. However, d should be 0.10 and CI around d should be 0.01 and 0.19. The corrected Table 3 appears below.

Table 3

ER family	ER strategy	Number of studies	Total N	Dir. of effect	Effect-size (d)	95% Confidence Interval around d
Situation selection	Forecast accuracy^*	1	84	–	−0.45	[−0.67; −0.23]
	Forecast accuracy	2	162	+	0.81	[0.65; 0.97]
	Avoidant coping	1	159	–	−0.43	[−0.59; −0.27]
	Behavioral disengagement	1	246	–	−0.32	[−0.44; −0.19]
Situation modification	Problem solving	3	628	+	0.23	[0.15; 0.31]
	Problem solving (negative)	1	246	–	−0.08	[−0.21; 0.05]
	Social support seeking	2	469	+	0.10	[0.01; 0.19]
	Conflict resolution	1	200	+	0.49	[0.35; 0.63]
	Conflict resolution (avoid)	1	200	–	−0.85	[−0.99; −0.71]
	Restraint	1	246	+	0.15	[0.02; 0.28]
Attentional deployment	Rumination	1	157	–	−0.98	[−1.14; −0.82]
	Mental disengagement	1	246	–	−0.10	[−0.23; 0.03]
Cognitive change	Self-efficacy	3	564	+	0.47	[0.33; 0.61]
	Positive interpretation	1	246	+	0.21	[0.08; 0.34]
	Humour	1	246	+	0.08	[−0.05; 0.21]
	Denial	1	246	–	−0.41	[−0.54; −0.28]
	Acceptance	1	246	+	0.21	[0.08; 0.34]
Response modulation	Venting	1	246	+	0.27	[0.14; 0.40]
	Aggressive behavior	2	573	–	−0.54	[−0.62; −0.46]
	Self-harm	1	192	–	−0.63	[−0.77; −0.49]
	Substance use	7	1604	–	−0.27	[−0.32; −0.22]
	Bulimia/Food preocupation	2	470	–	−0.10	[−0.19; −0.01]

Linking emotional intelligence (ability) to the use of emotion regulation strategies.

The forecast accuracy indices were calculated such that higher numbers indicate poorer accuracy.

Furthermore, in the original article, there was an error. Interpretations were made considering the wrong r (in Goldenberg's study).

A correction has been made to Results section, subsection EI and Situation Modification, paragraph five:

“Regarding ability EI, the results obtained are consistent with those that use trait measures. Higher ability EI is associated with greater use of problem-focused coping (Goldenberg et al., 2006; MacCann et al., 2011; but see Bastian et al., 2005 ¹² for non-significant results), although there is no significant relationship between an individual's ability to restrain him or herself (wait for the appropriate moment to act and avoid acting prematurely) and EI (Bastian et al., 2005)¹³. Ability EI also relates to more social support seeking, although effect sizes are nearly null (see Bastian et al., 2005 ¹⁴; Goldenberg et al., 2006)”.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Footnotes

12.^The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Active Coping” and “Planning Coping” subscales of the COPE.

13.^The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Restraint Coping” subscale of the COPE.

14.^The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Instrumental Social Support” subscale of the COPE.

References

1
AdeyemoD. A. (2007). Moderating influence of emotional intelligence on the link between academic self-efficacy and achievement of university students. Psychol. Dev. Soc. 19, 199–213. 10.1177/097133360701900204
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
2
AlmranJ. I.PunamakiR. (2008). Relationship between gender, age, academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and coping styles in Bahraini adolescents. Individ. Diff. Res. 6, 104–119.
- Google Scholar
3
AnimasahunR. A. (2008). Predictive estimates of emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, self-efficacy and creativity skills on conflict resolution behaviour among the NURTW in the south-western Nigeria. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci. 6, 68–74.
- Google Scholar
4
Aradilla-HerreroA.Tomás-SábadoJ.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2014). Associations between emotional intelligence, depression and suicide risk in nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today34, 520–525. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.001
5
AustinE. J.DoreT. C. P.O'DonovanK. M. (2008). Associations of personality and emotional intelligence with display rule perceptions and emotional labour. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 679–688. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.001
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
6
AustinE. J.SaklofskeD. H.EganV. (2005). Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 38, 547–558. 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.009
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
7
AustinE. J.SaklofskeD. H.MastorasS. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence, coping and exam-related stress in Canadian undergraduate students. Aust. J. Psychol. 62, 42–50. 10.1080/00049530903312899
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
8
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.AllenK. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment11, 191–206. 10.1177/1073191104268029
9
BastianV. A.BurnsN. R.NettelbeckT. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Pers. Individ. Diff. 39, 1135–1145. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.006
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
10
BrackettM. A.MayerJ. D. (2003). Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 1147–1158. 10.1177/0146167203254596
11
BrackettM. A.MayerJ. D.WarnerR. M. (2004). Emotional intelligence and its relation to everyday behaviour. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36, 1387–1402. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00236-8
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
12
BrownC.George-CurranR.SmithM. L. (2003). The role of emotional intelligence in the career commitment and decision-making process. J. Career Assess. 11, 379–392. 10.1177/1069072703255834
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
13
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 822–848. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
14
CabelloR.SalgueroJ. M.Fernández-BerrocalP.GrossJ. J. (2013). A Spanish adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 29, 234–240. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000150
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
15
ChanD. W. (2004). Perceived emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36, 1781–1795. 10.1016/j.paid.2003.07.007
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
16
CharoensukmongkolP. (2014). Benefits of mindfulness meditation on emotional intelligence, general self-efficacy, and perceived stress: evidence from Thailand. J. Spirit. Ment. Health16, 171–192. 10.1080/19349637.2014.925364
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
17
CiarrochiJ.DeaneF. P.AndersonS. (2002). Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between stress and mental health. Pers. Individ. Diff. 32, 197–209. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00012-5
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
18
CiarrochiJ. V.DeaneF. P. (2001). Emotional competence and willingness to seek help from professional and nonprofessional sources. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 29, 233–246. 10.1080/03069880124843
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
19
CoumansN. (2005). L'Influence de l'Intelligence Émotionnelle sur les Processus Mnésiques Impliqués dans la Régulation Émotionnelle: Analyse du Décours Temporel [Impact of Emotional Intelligence on the Memory Processes Involved in Emotion Regulation: A Temporal Analysis]., Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain.
- Google Scholar
20
DayA. L.TherrienD. L.CarrollS. A. (2005). Predicting psychological health: assessing the incremental validity of emotional intelligence beyond personality, type A behaviour, and daily hassles. Eur. J. Pers. 19, 519–536. 10.1002/per.552
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
21
Di FabioA.PalazzeschiL. (2008). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in a sample of Italian high school teachers. Soc. Behav. Pers. 36, 315–326. 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.3.315
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
22
Di FabioA.SaklofskeD. H. (2014a). Comparing ability and self-report trait emotional intelligence, fluid intelligence, and personality traits in career decision. Pers. Individ. Diff. 64, 174–178. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.024
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
23
Di FabioA.SaklofskeD. H. (2014b). Promoting individual resources: the challenge of trait emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 65, 19–23. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.026
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
24
DunnE. W.BrackettM. A.Ashton-JamesC.SchneidermanE.SaloveyP. (2007). On emotionally intelligent time travel: individual differences in affective forecasting ability. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 85–93. 10.1177/0146167206294201
25
DuránA.ExtremeraN.ReyL.Fernandez-BerrocalP.MontalbanF. (2006). Predicting academic burnout and in educational settings: assessing the incremental validity of perceived emotional intelligence beyond perceived stress and general self-efficacy. Psicotherma18, 158–164.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
26
GardnerK. J.QuintonS.QualterP. (2014). The role of trait and ability emotional intelligence in bulimic symptoms. Eat. Behav. 15, 237–240. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.02.002
27
GeritsL.DerksenJ. J. L.VerbruggenA. B. (2004). Emotional intelligence and adaptive success of nurses caring for people with mental retardation and severe behavior problems. Ment. Retard. Law42, 106–121. 10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<106:EIAASO>2.0.CO;2
28
GheeA. C.JohnsonC. S. (2008). Emotional intelligence: a moderator of perceived alcohol peer norms and alcohol use. J. Drug Educ. 38, 71–83. 10.2190/DE.38.1.f
29
GoldenbergI.MathesonK.MantlerJ. (2006). The assessment of emotional intelligence: a comparison of performance-based and self-report methodologies. J. Pers. Assess. 86, 33–45. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_05
30
GrevenC.Chamorro-PremuzicT.ArtecheA.FurnhamA. (2008). A hierarchical integration of dispositional determinants of general health in students: the Big Five, trait emotional intelligence, and humor styles. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1562–1573. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.012
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
31
HoergerM.ChapmanB. P.EpsteinR. M.DubersteinP. R. (2012). Emotional intelligence: a theoretical framework for individual differences in affective forecasting. Emotion12, 716–725. 10.1037/a0026724
32
JohnsonH. A. M.SpectorP. E. (2007). Service with a smile: do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labour process?J. Occup. Health Psychol. 12, 319–333. 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.319
33
JordanP. J.TrothA. C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution: implications for human resource development. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 4, 62–79. 10.1177/1523422302004001005
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
34
JordanP. J.TrothA. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Hum. Perform. 17, 195–218. 10.1207/s15327043hup1702_4
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
35
KafetsiosK.LoumakouM. (2007). A comparative evaluation of the effects of trait emotional intelligence and emotion regulation on affect at work and job satisfaction. Int. J. Work Org. Emot. 2, 71–87. 10.1504/IJWOE.2007.013616
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
36
KarimJ.ShahS. H. (2014). Ability emotional intelligence predicts quality of life beyond personality, affectivity, and cognitive intelligence. Appl. Res. Qual. Life9, 733–747. 10.1007/s11482-013-9267-1
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
37
KaurI.SchutteN. S.ThorsteinssonE. B. (2006). Gambling control self-efficacy as a mediator of the effects of low emotional intelligence on problem gambling. J. Gambl. Stud. 22, 405–411. 10.1007/s10899-006-9029-1
38
KimH. J.AgrusaJ. (2011). Hospitality service employees' coping styles: the role of emotional intelligence, two basic personality traits, and socio-demographic factors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 30, 588–598. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.11.003
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
39
KirkB. A.SchutteN. S.HineD. W. (2008). Development and preliminary validation of an emotional self-efficacy scale. Pers. Individ. Diff. 45, 432–436. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.010
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
40
KluemperD. H. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence. The impact of core-self evaluations and social desirability. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1402–1412. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.008
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
41
KokindaL. (2010). The Effects of Meditation on Openness, Awareness, and Acceptance: A Correlational Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Los Angeles.
- Google Scholar
42
LancianoT.CurciA.KafetsiosK.EliaL.ZammunerV. L. (2012). Attachment and dysfunctional rumination: the mediating role of emotional intelligence abilities. Pers. Individ. Diff. 53, 753–758. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.027
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
43
LeeJ. H.OkC. (2012). Reducing burnout and enhancing job satisfaction: critical role of hotel employees emotional intelligence and emotional labour. Int. J. Hosp. Manag.31, 1101–1112. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.01.007
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
44
LimoneroJ. T.Tomás-SábadoJ.Fernández-CastroJ. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence and its relation to tobacco and cannabis use among university students. Psicothema18, 95–100.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
45
MacCannC.FogartyG. J.ZeidnerM.RobertsR. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36, 60–70. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.002
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
46
MarkeyM. A.Vander WalJ. S. (2007). The role of emotional intelligence and negative affect in bulimic symptomatology. Compr. Psychiatry48, 458–464. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.006
47
MartinW. E.EastonC.WilsonS.TakemotoM.SullivanS. (2004). Salience of emotional intelligence as core characteristics of being a counselor. Couns. Educ. Superv. 44, 17–30. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2004.tb01857.x
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
48
MikolajczakM.LuminetO. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: an exploratory study. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1445–1453. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.012
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
49
MikolajczakM.LuminetO.MenilC. (2006). Predicting resistance to stress: incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence over alexithymia and optimism. Psicothema18, 79–88.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
50
MikolajczakM.MenilC.LuminetO. (2007b). Explaining the protective effect of trait emotional intelligence regarding occupational stress: exploration of emotional labor processes. J. Res. Pers. 41, 1107–1117. 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.003
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
51
MikolajczakM.NelisD.QuoidbachJ.HansenneM. (2008). If you can regulate sadness, you can probably regulate shame: impact of emotional intelligence on emotion regulation and coping efficiency across discrete emotions. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1356–1368. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.004
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
52
MikolajczakM.PetridesK. V.HurryJ. (2009a). Adolescents choosing self-harm as an emotion regulation strategy: the protective role of trait emotional intelligence. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 48, 181–193. 10.1348/014466508X386027
53
MonaciM. C.ScacchiL.PosaM.TrentinR. (2013). Peer pressure and alcohol consumption among university students: the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Boll. Psicol. Appl. 267, 17–31.
- Google Scholar
54
Montes-BergesB.AugustoJ. M. (2007). Exploring the relationship between perceived emotional intelligence, coping, social support and mental health in nursing students. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 14, 163–171. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01059.x
55
MoradiA.PishvaN.EhsanH. B.HadadiP.PouladiF. (2011). The relationship between coping strategies and emotional intelligence. Soc. Behav. Sci. 30, 748–751. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.146
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
56
MoutonA.HansenneM.DelcourR.CloesM. (2013). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among physical education teachers. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 32, 342–354.
- Google Scholar
57
PetridesK. V.NivenL.MouskountiT. (2006a). The trait emotional intelligence of ballet dancers and musicians. Psicothema18, 101–107.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
58
PetridesK. V.Pérez-GonzálezJ. C.FurnhamA. (2007a). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cogn. Emot. 21, 26–55. 10.1080/02699930601038912
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
59
PetridesK. V.PitaR.KokkinakiF. (2007b). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. Br. J. Psychol. 98, 273–289. 10.1348/000712606X120618
60
PettitM. L.JacobsS. C.PageK. S.PorrasC. V. (2010). An assessment of perceived emotional intelligence and eating attitudes among college students. Am. J. Health Educ. 41, 46–52. 10.1080/19325037.2010.10599126
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
61
RahimM. A.MinorsP. (2003). Effects of emotional intelligence on concern for quality and problem solving. Manag. Audit. J. 18, 150–155. 10.1108/02686900310455146
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
62
RamosN.Fernández-BerrocalP.ExtremeraN. (2007). Perceived emotional intelligence facilitates cognitive-emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor. Cogn. Emot. 21, 758–772. 10.1080/02699930600845846
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
63
RileyH.SchutteN. S. (2003). Low emotional intelligence as a predictor of substance-use problems. J. Drug Educ. 33, 391–398. 10.2190/6DH9-YT0M-FT99-2X05
64
RiversS. E.BrackettM. A.OmoriM.SicklerC. (2013). Emotion skills as a protective factor for risky behaviors among college students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 54, 172–183. 10.1353/csd.2013.0012
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
65
RogersP.QualterP.PhelpsG.GardnerK. (2006). Belief in the paranormal, coping and emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 41, 1089–1105. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.014
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
66
RossenE.KranzlerJ. H. (2009). Incremental validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) after controlling for personality and intelligence. J. Res. Pers. 43, 60–65. 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.002
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
67
SaklofskeD. H.AustinE. J.GallowayJ.DavidsonK. (2007). Individual difference correlates of health-related behaviours: preliminary evidence for links between emotional intelligence and coping. Pers. Individ. Diff. 42, 491–502. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.006
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
68
SaklofskeD. H.AustinE. J.MastorasS. M.BeatonL.OsborneS. E. (2012). Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: different patterns of association for stress and success. Learn. Individ. Diff. 22, 251–257. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.010
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
69
SalamiS. O. (2010a). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and students' attitudes: implications for quality education. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2, 247–257.
- Google Scholar
70
SalamiS. O. (2010b). Conflict resolution strategies and organizational citizenship behavior: the moderating role of trait emotional intelligence. Soc. Behav. Pers. 38, 75–86. 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.1.75
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
71
SalgueroJ. M.ExtremeraN.Fernandez-BerrocalP. (2013). A meta-mood model of rumination and depression: preliminary test in a non-clinical population. Scand. J. Psychol. 54, 166–172. 10.1111/sjop.12026
72
SaloveyP.StroudL. R.WooleryA.EpelE. (2002). Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: further explorations using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychol. Health17, 611–627. 10.1080/08870440290025812
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
73
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M. (2011). Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between mindfulness and subjective well-being. Pers. Individ. Diff. 50, 1116–1119. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.037
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
74
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M.HineD. W. (2011). The association of ability and trait emotional intelligence with alcohol problems. Addict. Res. Theory19, 260–265. 10.3109/16066359.2010.512108
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
75
SchutteN. S.ManesR. R.MalouffJ. M. (2009). Antecedent-focused emotion regulation, response modulation and well-being. Curr. Psychol. 28, 21–31. 10.1007/s12144-009-9044-3
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
76
SchutteN. S.SchuettpelzE.MalouffJ. M. (2001b). Emotional intelligence and task performance. Imagin. Cogn. Pers. 20, 347–354. 10.2190/J0X6-BHTG-KPV6-2UXX
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
77
ShahM.ThingujamN. S. (2008). Perceived emotional intelligence and ways of coping among students. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 34, 83–91.
- Google Scholar
78
ShahzadS.BegumN.KhanA. (2013). Understanding emotions in adolescents: linkage of trait emotional intelligence with aggression. Asian J. Soc. Sci. Hum. 2, 386–394.
- Google Scholar
79
SolankiD.LaneA. M. (2010). Relationships between exercise as a mood regulation strategy and trait emotional intelligence. Asian J. Sports Med. 1, 195–200.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
80
TotterdellP.HolmanD. (2003). Emotion regulation in customer service roles: testing a model of emotional labor. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 8, 55–73. 10.1037/1076-8998.8.1.55
81
TrinidadD. R.JohnsonC. A. (2002). The association between emotional intelligence and early adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. Pers. Individ. Diff. 32, 95–105. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00008-3
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
82
TsaousisI.NikolaouI. (2005). Exploring the relationship of emotional intelligence with physical and psychological health functioning. Stress Health21, 77–86. 10.1002/smi.1042
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
83
TsarenkoY.StrizhakovaY. (2013). Coping with service failures. Eur. J. Market. 47, 71–92. 10.1108/03090561311285466
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
84
VelascoC.FernándezI.PáezD.CamposM. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence, alexithymia, coping and emotional regulation. Psicothema18, 89–94.
- Pubmed Abstract
- Google Scholar
85
VillanuevaJ. J.SanchezJ. C. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence and leadership self-efficacy: their relationship with collective efficacy. Span. J. Psychol. 10, 349–357. 10.1017/S1138741600006612
86
WangY.KongF. (2014). The role of emotional intelligence in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and mental distress. Soc. Indic. Res. 116, 843–852. 10.1007/s11205-013-0327-6
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
87
ZeidnerM.KlodaI. (2013). Emotional intelligence (EI), conflict resolution patterns, and relationship satisfaction: actor and partner effects revisited. Pers. Individ. Diff. 54, 278–283. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.013
- CrossRef
- Google Scholar
88
ZomerL. M. A. (2012). The Relationships among Emotional Intelligence, Gender, Coping Strategies, and Well-Being in the Management of Stress in Close Interpersonal Relationships and the Workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
- Google Scholar

Summary

Keywords

emotional intelligence, emotional competence, emotion regulation, coping, review, meta-analysis

Citation

Peña-Sarrionandia A, Mikolajczak M and Gross JJ (2019) Corrigendum: Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 10:2610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02610

Received

09 October 2019

Accepted

05 November 2019

Published

27 November 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited and reviewed by

Pablo Fernández-Berrocal, University of Málaga, Spain

Updates

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Moïra Mikolajczak moira.mikolajczak@uclouvain.be

This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Educational Psychology

CORRECTION article

Corrigendum: Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis

Statements

Footnotes

References

Summary

Outline

Cite article

Article metrics

CORRECTION article

Corrigendum: Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis

Statements

Footnotes

References

Summary

Outline

Cite article

Share article

Article metrics