HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Psychol., 18 February 2020
Sec. Cognition
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03051

The Overlooked Tradition of “Personal Music” and Its Place in the Evolution of Music

  • 1Braavo Enterprises, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • 2Independent Researcher, Boston, MA, United States
  • 3The State Institute for Art Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
  • 4Experimental Laboratory of the North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russia
  • 5International Jaw Harp Music Center, Yakutsk, Russia
  • 6Department of Art Studies, Arctic State Institute of Arts and Culture, Yakutsk, Russia

This is an attempt to describe and explain so-called timbre-based music as a special system of musicking, communication, and psychological and social usage, which along with its corresponding beliefs constitutes a viable alternative to “frequency-based” music. Unfortunately, the current scientific research into music has been skewed almost entirely in favor of the frequency-based music prevalent in the West. Subsequently, whenever samples of timbre-based music attract the attention of Western researchers, these are usually interpreted as “defective” implementations of frequency-based music. The presence of discrete pitch is often regarded as the structural criterion that distinguishes music from non-music. We would like to present evidence to the contrary—in support of the existence of indigenous music systems based on the discretization and patterning of aspects of timbre, rather than pitch. This evidence comes mainly from extensive ethnographic research systematically conducted in eastern European and Asian parts of Russia from the 1890s. It involved the efforts of thousands of specialists and was coordinated by dozens of research institutions, and it has included not just ethnomusicology but linguistics, philology, organology, archaeology, anthropology, geography, and religious, and social studies. Much of the data has not been translated into Western languages. Although some Soviet-era publications were tainted by Marxist ideology, many researchers strove to provide accurate information (despite at times having been prosecuted for their work), and post-1990 research undertook a substantial revision of ideologically compromised concepts. Timbre-based tonal organization (TO) differs from that based on frequency in its personal orientation: musicking here occurs primarily for oneself and/or for close relatives/friends. Collective music-making is rare and exceptional. The foundation of timbre-based music seems to have vocal roots and rests on “personal song”—a system of personal identification through individualized patterns of rhythm, timbre, and pitch contour, utilized like a “human voice”—whose sound enables the recognition of a particular individual. The instrumental counterpart of the personalized singing tradition is the jaw harp tradition. The jaw harp is the principal musical instrument for at least 21 ethnicities in Russia, who occupy over half the territory of the country. The evolution of its TO forms the backbone for the development of timbre-based music art. Here, we provide the acoustic, socio-cultural, geographic, and chronological overview of timbre-based music.

In the past few decades, a lively discussion on matters concerning the origin and evolution of music has finally begun to move toward a consensus among specialists (Cross and Morley, 2009): the biological importance of music is being seen in its capacity to foster and sustain social interactions within a group, to the mutual benefit of its members. Here, music stands as an important counterpart to language—another biological marker of Homo sapiens—specializing in managing the emotional aspect of human interaction. Without diminishing the importance of this perspective, we wish to cast light as well on the personal function of music—its capacity to organize and sustain the psychological identity of an individual. This function must have factored in the evolution of music since at least the Upper Paleolithic.

The need for the update grows as more scholars lean toward regarding music as an exclusively collective phenomenon. Thus, Lewis (2013) concludes: “In most parts of the world, and for most of human history, music exists only because of the social relations that enable its performance.” Levinson (2013) infers that in the evolution of music its structural complexity “may have its origins in joint action rather than in abstract representations or solitary mentation1. We will argue the contrary—that at least in the traditional lifestyle of numerous native Siberian ethnoses, music serves primarily as means of solitary mentation and abstract representation of reality. There is no reason to believe that this manner of “musicking” (Small, 1998) is a recent development, and there are valid reasons to prototype prehistoric North Eurasian music upon this type of music.

Dichotomy Between Timbre-Based and Frequency-Based Music

Almost everything that we know about the perception of music and what has served as a scientifically established foundation for modern views on the origin of music comes from a musical tradition based on frequency discrimination of musical sounds. It is this tradition that currently prevails in the world. Its prevalence probably started with the rise of Bronze Age urban civilizations, whose palace and temple music traditions relied on math-based theory (Nikolsky, 2016). Rationally defined pitches have made the corresponding music practices rely on the frequency aspect. Civilizations that cultivated frequency-based music imposed their influence on the music cultures of neighboring peoples. On a global scale, this must have resulted in a steady decline of the alternative form of TO that was based on timbre. This process is evident in the music cultures of many native Siberian peoples, e.g., the Nganasan, whose timbre-based tradition has been recently overtaken by the Russian frequency-based tradition (Bicheool, 2009). Schneider (2001) qualifies such development as “pitch reductionism”—the replacement of timbre-based tuning standards by frequency-based standards, most obvious in the indigenous gong/bell and xylophone music. Timbral vocal music is no less vulnerable to pitch reductionism.

Examples-1/22

Ex.1. Timbre-based vocal music: throat-singing song, “Seagull,” in archaic style, by Anna Ankhani, a 70-year-old Koryak woman from a remote reindeer-breeding settlement, Khailino, in Northern Kamchatka (reachable only by aerial transportation). Singing involves throat-rasping and double phonation that allows the singer to produce sounds an octave below her speaking voice range (http://chirb.it/n5JNvk).

Ex.2. Modern style Koryak “Festive song” by Maria Appolon, a 48-year-old woman from a little town, Ossora, a seaport at Bering Sea. Maria is a legislator in the local district Council and a member of the folk ensemble, “Agya,” that often performs at international festivals, special events, and for tourists. Her singing exhibits traits of “frequency-based music”: no timbral effects, clear discrete pitches that are interconnected without gliding that is so typical for traditional singing in Kamchatka, hexatonic mode, consisting of 2 motifs (a descending trichord and an ascending tetrachord) which retain amazing precision in intonation, without noticeable fluctuations, and strict formulaic structure (http://chirb.it/FK7A8A).

In the literature in English, the distinction between “pitch-centered” and “timbre-centered” musics was drawn by Levin and Suzukei (2006, p. 45–72). Fales (2002) discussed the downsides of “pitch-centrism” and “timbre-deafness” in approaching timbre-based music. In the Russian literature, the dialectics of timbre and pitch was acknowledged much earlier. The pioneer of ear-training and music psychology in Russia, Maykapar (1900), noticed that the musical ear developed from a timbre- to a frequency-reference frame, and proposed to begin musical education with timbral exercises. Since then, ear-training has become an obligatory part of music education in Russia, and has attracted many researchers (Blium, 1977). Adoption of a state-controlled, unified system of early music education by the Bolsheviks created an exceptionally diversified cross-cultural pool of subjects for the investigation of music skills acquisition (Arakelova, 2012). Based on such data, Teplov (1947)3 formulated his theory of interference between “timbral” (speech-like) and “pitch” (music-like) hearing—the latter typically replacing the former by the beginning of a child's primary education, provided there was cultural exposure to frequency-based music4.

Teplov's theory was substantiated by Leontyev (2009, p. 115–36), Vygotsky's pupil, in a series of experiments that disclosed a “timbre-centered” estimation of pitch in adults who lacked music schooling5. To demonstrate that pitch-ear is a “functional organ”6—absent at the moment of birth and forming as a consequence of cognitive development—Leontyev built a vibrator machine and successfully taught subjects to discriminate pitch exclusively by touch. Another Vygotskian, Zaporozhets, headed the research on the emergence of frequency-oriented hearing in preschool children (Endovitskaya, 1959, 1964; Lisina, 1966; Mukhina and Lisina, 1966; Repina, 1966a,b; Zaporozhets, 2003)7. His group concluded that the genesis of frequency discrimination reflected a fundamental re-organization of motoric, visual, and spatial orientations throughout childhood—embodying a form of abstraction “of a number of perceptual activities, directed at the exploration of objects and phenomena of reality, identification and fixation of their perceptual attributes and interrelations” (Zaporozhets, 1985, p. 1:18).

The frequency-based “musical ear” corresponds to the urban Western environment, where systemically organized straight parallel lines and right angles are widespread and dominant. But these do not exist in the steppe or tundra (Nikolsky, 2016, Appendix-7 in Supplementary Material). Life in the tundra promotes music systems based on indefinite (ekmelic or khasmatonal) pitch (Alekseyev, 1986) and fine timbral distinctions, corresponding to life in an open terrain that lacks landmarks. There, orientation occurs via qualitative (non-quantitative!) evaluations of wind, light, snow, distance, etc., rather than the incremental and reversible pathfinding in the urban landscape. Most likely, timbre-centrism originates from life in such natural sound-stages where “definite” rhythm and frequency are mostly bound to human activities, and are overall less important than timbre-differentiated environmental sounds (Fales, 2002). The opposition of indefinite/definite pitch systems in Russian musicology finds its match in the opposition of “smooth” and “striated” pitch in Western ethnomusicology (During and During, 2015).

Timbre-centeredness distinguishes the vocalizations of newborns: crying, screaming, rasping, grunting, whining, sobbing, whimpering, etc. (Loewy, 1995). Even prenatally, fetuses recognize parental voices (Lee and Kisilevsky, 2014), which involves at least some timbral discrimination. Newborns distinguish different musical instruments by timbre (McAdams and Bertoncini, 1997). Timbre discrimination is so crucial for a newborn's life that it appears innate (Simons, 1986, p. 43). Perhaps the ontogenetic progression from timbre to frequency (Teplov, 1947) takes the same course as cultural evolution, and “indefinite-pitch” music systems precede “definite-pitch” systems (Alekseyev, 1986, p. 14–15)—following the general paradigm suggested by Foster (1994). Unfortunately, published research on the acquisition of musical skills overwhelmingly focuses on the experience of children in Western societies8. Garfias (1990) seems to share Alekseyev's conviction that in indigenous music cultures infants start their musical development from speech-like timbral hearing. Tuvan children learn early to vocally imitate typical environmental sounds with amazing precision, adopting learned timbral distinctions for the creation of their own music (Levin and Suzukei, 2006, p. 85–7)—very much like Western children model their vocal improvisations upon commonly heard tunes (Bjørkvold, 1992). Although Tuvans also use frequency-based music, it remains secondary in importance for them.

In Western classical music, the opposite pertains: it is timbre that is secondary (Scruton, 1997, p. 77–8). Even its standard definition—the “attribute of sensation in terms of which a listener can judge that two sounds having the same loudness and pitch are dissimilar” (ASA, 1951)—is culturally skewed toward prioritizing frequency. Western “frequency-centrism” is most evident in the tendency to ascribe pitch values to clearly non-musical sounds (e.g., car brakes)—including sounds of non-Western timbral music, such as Inuit (Walker, 1997, p. 323). Unsurprisingly, Westerners' attempts to reproduce indigenous timbral music introduce distortions and are rejected by native users (Ojamaa, 2005).

The reverse bias affects the use of frequency-centered music by timbre-centered musicians. Soviet researchers of the collectivization/likbez era discovered that children (Beliayeva-Ekzempliarskaya, 1925) and adolescents (Antoshina, 1939) who lacked exposure to classical music could not detect a harmonic mismatch when a well-known melody was performed against accompaniment in a wrong key. Transference of popular tunes across different music systems usually involves systemic pitch conversion. Thus, the Russian-Ukrainian diatonic heptatonic song “Provody” becomes anhemitonic pentatonic in Buryat and whole-tone tetratonic in Yakut reproductions, severely distorting the original intervallic structure (Alekseyev, 1986, p. 148–55). Both, Buryats and Yakuts, cultivate timbral music. It might be appropriate here to speak of the intuitive substitution of “pitch classes” of the original foreign song (which was composed circa 1918 in Ukraine within the framework of Western tonality) by the “timbral classes” of traditional Buryat and Yakut music which sounded the closest to the original. The “strange” and complex sounding tonality of the foreign song, which for some reason attracted the attention of the indigenous musicians, was substituted by the TO that was habitually “normal” and easy for them.

Timbre-oriented musical cultures seem to base their musical modes on a set of pitch levels that are joined together according to some common trait(s) of timbral coloration and/or sound production technique(s). Thereby a number of such related “timbre-classes” become united into a “timbral mode.” This is in contrast to a specific intervallic distance in pitch that distinguishes one “degree” of a musical mode and/or key from another “degree” in frequency-oriented music cultures. Inevitable conversion from pitch- to timbre-based frame of reference must be responsible for the intervallic distortions, discovered by Alekseyev in a Russian-Ukranian tonal song upon its appropriation by the indigenous Buryat and Yakut musicians.

Personal Nature of Timbre-Based Music

Often overlooked is the fundamental unsuitability of timbre-centered music for collective use—in sharp contrast to frequency-centered music. Even before the crystallization of Western tonality, musicians realized that the more instruments that played the same harmony, the more euphonic it appeared (Mersenne, 1957, p. 270). However, the more speakers who collectively pronounce the same sentence, the less articulate it sounds. People sing together, but take turns speaking (Brown, 2007). Fusion of sounds dominates production and perception of music (Huron, 2001) because pitches readily conjoin in unisons, “double-notes” and chords. Timbre-centered music, however, resembles speech in its soliloquacity: for a native listener, simultaneous throat-singing by a dozen singers would make the song unintelligible.

Unlike the simple dimensionality of height for pitch, the multi-dimensionality of timbre considerably complicates its categorization (Krumhansl, 1989). Timbre-based music also misses the systemic rationality of frequency-based music systems. The interrelation of pitches cross-refers any given pitch value, facilitating the interpretation of pitch by making it “rational”—whereas timbre stands as “irrational,” lacking anything akin to intervallic ratios (Balzano, 1986). To add to the confusion, the temporal dimensions of timbre interact with its spectral dimensions (Caclin et al., 2007), disallowing multiple timbres to synchronize perfectly. Different timbres, dubbed in unison, either blend into a new timbre, intensifying one of the constituents, or repel each other (Sandell, 1995). Blending depends primarily on the onset of synchrony, similarity of attacks, and/or spectral centroids—traditionally studied within the field of orchestration (Tardieu and McAdams, 2012). Orchestration is limited to frequency-centered music, where musical instruments are perfected to produce clear pitch. Even many popular instruments exhibit registrally fixed formants, and can therefore be considered “pitch-generalized”—which greatly influences their timbral blend (Lembke and McAdams, 2015). Unsurprisingly, unison blending is greater than non-unison blending, inverse to the identifiability of constituent timbres (Kendall and Carterette, 1993). The fusion of multiple “pitch-generalized” instruments generates orchestral tutti—an undistinguishable mass of timbres that nevertheless remains “pitch-clear.”

There is no tutti in indigenous timbre-centered music9. Such music cultivates very different instruments (whip, buzzer, cane, flask), distinguished by a characteristic timbre and indefinite pitch (Mazepus and Galitskaya, 1997). In Russian musicology, these are qualified as “phono-instruments”10—sound-producing tools manufactured for some common application other than music-making (Yesipova, 2008). The most important of them is the Jaw Harp (JH)11. In the contiguous area from the Urals to the Okhotsk Sea, all indigenous ethnicities have their JH traditions (Emsheimer, 1986). A century ago, every ethnicity of Asiatic Russia possessed the JH (Jochelson, 1928, p. 217). The JH can be qualified as the archetypical instrument of Siberia (Sheikin, 1996). It and other “mouth-resonating instruments” (mirlitons, bows, “singing-pipes”) specialize in making “music for oneself” (Sheikin, 2002, p. 116–66). The JH's solitary use prevails over the Volga Plateau (Zagretdinov, 1997), Tuva/Altai (Suzukei, 1989), Afghanistan (Koskoff, 2008, p. 1062), Sakhalin (Mamcheva, 2005), Taiwan (Blench, 2004), Indochina (Sam, 2008), Indonesia (Matusky, 2008), and New Guinea (Pugh-Kitingan, 1977).

Such a wide geographic distribution indicates the inter-cultural—acoustic—reason for JH's personal application: except for the recently invented JH models12, traditional instruments are barely audible beyond a few meters. Even in social settings, JH remains private. Such are JH's romantic responsorial duets between a young man and a young woman, known, other than in Russia, in Southern China (Picken, 1957, p. 154), Tibet (Arcones, 2013, p. 216), Hainan (Hsu, 2001), Taiwan (McGovern, 1922), Laos (Simana and Preisig, 2003), Vietnam (Rault and Brenton, 2000, p. 83), Indonesia (Kartomi, 2012, p. 160), New Guinea (Pugh-Kitingan, 1977), and Western Europe (Kolltveit, 2006, p. 111).

Example-3

“Serenading” khomus (Yakut JH): a romantic duet in traditional style, performed by Erkin Alekseyev and Tokuiaana Nikolayeva. Music proceeds in a responsorial setting, but ends with simultaneous playing that reflects the union of feelings (http://chirb.it/rH6bFD).

Germane in this context is that “serenading” duets involve taking turns, like interlocution: one player reproduces the sonic material suggested by another player (Haid, 1999).

The JH is also a child's favorite plaything—another cross-cultural sphere of private use—in Yakutia (Dyakonova, 2017), Ural (Aleksandrova, 2017), Sakhalin (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 197), Uzbekistan (Beliayev, 1933), Kyrgyzstan (Vinogradov, 1958, p. 180), Afghanistan (Slobin, 1976, p. 53), Mongolia (Pegg, 2001), Japan (Ishi, 1916), southeastern China (Picken, 1957), Polynesia (McLean, 1999), Indonesia (McPhee, 1955), and Western Europe (Kolltveit, 2006, p. 109). Toying with a JH is typical during the long hours of herding (Shchurov, 1995), a task entrusted to children in nomadic Asiatic societies (Stépanoff et al., 2017). In Altai, the JH is regarded as a herding instrument (Dorina, 2004). Children start working in pastures at ages 5–6 (Yekeyeva, 2011). In Yakutia, mothers teach their children to make JHs from tree splinters (Tchakhov, 2012). Nivkh 5-year-olds learn to play and make bamboo and grass JHs, guided by parents, grandparents, or older siblings13.

Self-manufacturing is an important marker of timbral instruments; personal use accompanies personal manufacturing (Dorina, 2004)14. Even metallic JHs are often self-made, such as by flattening brass rifle cartridge cases (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 50). Forging of metallic JHs by a metalsmith is a relatively recent historic development, but instruments made that way are no less personal. Even in modern Western societies, JH gatherings promote private musicking—mostly solo playing, without electronic amplification, and submerging into a meditative state (Morgan, 2017). For Siberian vocal and instrumental traditions such musicking constitutes the norm (Zabolotskaya, 2009).

Despite the JH's tuning to a certain fundamental frequency (FF), indigenous techniques obstruct standard Western notation (frequency-based), since the production of discrete pitches constitutes only a fraction of the possibilities (Alekseyev, 1991b).

Example-4

“Mary had a little lamb,” produced on khomus by Erkin Alekseyev. This music demonstrates inauthentic, Western-style treatment of JH as a “frequency-based” musical instrument whose purpose is to accurately reproduce the pitches of “tunes” (http://chirb.it/HNcBsq).

The bulk of the JH's autochthonous repertory consists of speech-like articulations and special sound effects (Alekseev, 1988). Common among players, the verbal characteristics of JHs' sounds are all timbre-oriented (Zagretdinov, 1997). Each timbre-distinguished device usually carries a particular semantic value (Shishigin, 1995)15.

The JH tutti would mess up the clarity of articulation, preventing the parsing of meaningful musical elements such as tabygyr (staccato) (Alekseyev, 1986). Therefore, autochthonous styles are strictly soliloquy-based. A good example is the Yakut syyia tardy16 (“moderate playing”), nicknamed “talking khomus17 (Grigoryan, 1957), which is closely related to the vocal toyuk (Shishigin, 1995). Toyuk (song) is the most ancient form of dieretii yrya—a smooth-flowing, drawn out improvisational singing style, based on a limited set of melodic intonations, and timbrally individualized (Alekseyev, 2016). Syyia's closeness to toyuk enables the simultaneous singing and playing of a JH.

Example-5

Tuluktan doborum” (“Friendly bullfinch”)—spontaneously improvised simultaneous singing and playing on khomus by Agrafena Ptitsyna from Megino-Kangalasskii district of Yakutia. The performer starts in the style of degeren (rhythm-oriented, metrically regular), but after 30 s switches to another style, dieretii (smooth, metrically free style), and thereafter keeps alternating between the two. Instrumental and vocal parts interfere with each other: khomus as though obstructs attempts of the voice to carry out a coherent song (http://chirb.it/2D3pJh).

Yakuts do not consider the khomus to be frequency-based. They evaluate its sound not as “pitch,” but as “coloration.” Therefore, concurrent singing-playing constitutes “coloring” the same song. All Yakut music is predominantly solo-vocal, where “vocal” is understood as “mouth-driven”—incorporating both vocals and JHs (Alekseyev, 1991a).

The inclusion of the JH in bands is uncommon in indigenous traditions. It is bound to the South: i.e., India and Indonesia (Morgan, 2008). In northern Eurasia, JH playing is usually solitary, and an additional player can participate only if he/she is a close relative18. The JH “combo” is a recent phenomenon19, inspired by Western chamber music (Alekseyev, 1988, p. 185–7)20. Still, Siberian ensembles resemble the jazz combo by limiting tutti to only the start/finish of the music. Superimposition of JHs is understood here as a timbral mixture rather than as “frequency intervals”—unlike the counterpoint-style mentality of Austrian and German performers who group up to five or six JHs to produce “chords.”

Transmission and Participation in Performance of Timbre-Based Music

Frequency- and timbre-based musics fundamentally differ from one another with respect to transmission. It is much harder to reproduce someone's timbre than their pitch. Timbre is usually personalized. We recognize a person's voice and a musical instrument by its timbre. Consequently, timbre-based music is designed to reflect the state of a unique individual rather than that of a group. Timbre (Saitis and Weinzierl, 2019) and sonority (McAdams, 2019) have been inherently connected to the display of emotions—even within the Western classical music tradition (Maddox, 2009).

Frequency-centered music attunes the individual to the collective for their mutual benefit, enmeshing and empowering each participant through integration21;

Timbre-centered music attunes the individual to the surrounding nature, supernatural forces, a soulmate, or “oneself-in-the-past”22—all of which also integrate but do not enmesh.

The inherent individualism of timbre-centered music originates from mother-infant vocal communication. Their vocalizations imitate each other in pitch-contour and timbre to establish a personal bond (Malloch, 2000). These imitation games are deeply private, defining conventions of a “mini-culture” for each caretaker-infant pair (Trevarthen, 2008). Such a mini-culture opposes “culture” by circumnavigating social conventions for the sake of securing effective communication with any child, no matter how anomalous he/she may be.

Participation in a group always imposes obligations, and group music makes no exception. However, timbral music performance is fundamentally “free.” The performer plays to his/her own satisfaction rather than the satisfaction of others. This is also true with a mini-culture: the caretaker and infant lock in a sympathetic communication that preserves individual freedom.

For timbral music cultures, infant mini-cultures develop into an adolescent “maxi-culture”—a maximally inclusive culture that allows everyone to remain himself/herself, rewarding them with a positive experience.

Timbral music acts like self-directed speech in problem-solving situations: it encourages behavioral reorganization and compensates for negative experience. And here the JH exemplifies timbral music. Notably, in many indigenous Eurasian cultures the JH is renowned for being a female and children's instrument (Mazepus and Galitskaya, 1997). The JH creates a mini-culture for each player within the ethnic maxi-culture.

Personal Song (PS) as a Form of Timbre-Based Vocal Music

A peculiar form of “timbre-based” music is “personal song23 (PS)—a traditional custom of assigning a specific “tune” to each individual that represents his/her identity and satisfies the required sonic uniqueness: i.e., it does not resemble the timbre and melody of another person's singing (Novik, 1999). A “personal tune” incorporates a particular melodic contour and timbre, and is used to coin multiple variations that the singer spontaneously forges while singing/humming during everyday activities (Novik, 2003). Most of one's day is accompanied by such semi-conscious singing. A comparison of different versions of one's PS recorded on different occasions shows great variability in text and emotional states along with stability in the melodic structure (Ojamaa and Ross, 2004), suggesting a link between “self” and melody. Furthermore, when a person is absent and missed by relatives, they will sing that person's PS as a substitute for his/her presence (Dobzhanskaya, 2017). The unauthorized performance of a PS by strangers is prohibited, and is punishable by the offended party (Grachiova, 1983, p. 56)24.

Parents create PSs for their children as though “sound-painting,” employing acoustic parameters to express the visual-motoric traits of the child (hyperactive/calm, headstrong/social, big/small).

Examples-6/7

Ex.6. Dinimiaku's children personal song, created and directed to Dinimiaku by her father, Tubiaku Kosterkin, from the settlement Ust'-Avam in Taimyr, in Nganasan. The song uses the timbral markers: contrasting “clean” high and “dirty” low registers connected together by sliding, and embellished with the “tremolo” effect. According to the performer, the song expresses tenderness and playful teasing. The lyrics question if the girl is upset at the old grouchy woman (Dobzhanskaya, 2014, p. 159) (http://chirb.it/7htOzK).

Ex.7. Derkuptie's children personal song, performed as if “coming from him” to the house guests, by his mother, Valentina Kosterkina, in Nganasan. The song is “infantilized”: raised in pitch and “whiny”—it emphasizes the descending sliding intonations, as though gently “complaining.” The lyrics imply that the infant-boy is overwhelmed by the visitors' attention and wishes to be left alone (Dobzhanskaya, 2014, p. 156) (http://chirb.it/zsxAEm).

After reaching adulthood, one might create or accept as a gift a second PS. Such renewal addresses the discrepancies between “infantile” and grownup states. The new PS often emulates the PS of a relative who is considered a role model25.

Example-8

Adult personal song of Ver'a Nenyang, performed by his daughter, Liubov' Nenyang. Nenets masculine personal songs are characterized by praising one's own strength, luck, and smartness (Nenyang, 2006). Nenets adult personal songs usually oppose two contrasting vocal registers, joined by strong portamento, use of few “degrees” (3 in this example), and exaggerated intonations - the melodic intervals between the degrees are stretchable within the range of about 700 cents (Dobzhanskaya, 2017) (http://chirb.it/dgenGN).

The third26 PS is permissible at old age to reflect age-induced personality changes (Sheikin, 1996, p. 67).

Example-9

Murun Yrya (“nasal” song). Old age personal song of Maria Sleptsova-Kustui Maaia, of Yakut-Evenk ancestry, reproduced by her granddaughter, Marina Vasilyeva. Her grandmother used to sing this particular arrangement during knitting. The lyrics list many different garments made by Maria in the past and explain what they are good for (Dyakonova, 2014). The song is characterized by nasalization and kylysakh, applied to the simple formula of 3 pitches (“degrees”) (http://chirb.it/4Fc24f).

A PS resembles a renewable passport photograph, identifying principal temperamental shifts throughout life27. In this way a PS maintains personal integrity, reminding the singer of an anchor-state to return to after an emotional perturbation. This is most obvious in lengthy “autobiographical” PSs, where singers list dramatic events of their life (Ojamaa, 2002). A PS is replaced if the return to the anchor-state somehow becomes impossible.

PS “anchoring” is invaluable in the solitary lifestyle of Northern nomads, who are infamous for psycho-pathological disorders known as “arctic hysteria” (AH) (Tseng, 2003). In the colonial past, this diagnosis reflected the Eurocentric evaluation of the indigenous population by Western physicians (Tseng, 2007), but throughout the twentieth century AH captured the attention of anthropologists (Foulks, 1985). Eventually, AH fell within the scope of cross-cultural ethno-psychiatry as a “cultural syndrome” (Kirmayer, 2018). Such qualification somewhat undermines the life-threatening power of AH (Czaplicka, 1914, p. 307–25), perhaps because the English literature on AH focuses on Inuits, whose symptomatology appears milder and rarer than in the Russian North. Mitskevich (1929, p. 21) reported severe disabilities (and even deaths) in 60% of AH incidences in Upper Kolyma. He considered this to be an underestimate, however, since many concealed AH (13), and locals regarded it a “bliss” not to be medically treated (16). According to a Mitskevich's confidant, 100% of women in his settlement suffered from AH (21). AH ran through many families (24) and sometimes broke into mass “epidemies,” affecting up to a third of the population (25–29)28. Many feared contracting AH from others. Even in modern Russia, ethnographers are afraid to research AH-related matters29.

Earlier researchers explained AH by the negative influence of extreme cold and Polar night (Novakovsky, 1924). Later research has identified such contributing physiological factors as calcium and vitamin D deficiencies (Wallace and Ackerman, 1960). Similar symptoms were observed among Southern neighbors (Mongols), along with phobias and “copycat” syndrome—attributed to a sufferer's excessive submissiveness (Aberle, 1952). Alcoholism was also considered a contributing factor (Foulks, 1985), although alcohol was exceedingly expensive and thus unaffordable to the indigenous Siberian population before 1917 (Mitskevich, 1929, p. 16). More convincing is Mitskevich's connection of AH with chronic starvation, constant stress, excessive pre-pubertal sexual activities, and sensory deprivation, which affect the Northern population much more than the Southern (45) and are environmental rather than cultural—they are as common among local Russians as among Yakuts (9). Such etiology and epidemiology are confirmed by numerous authors (Tokarsky, 1893; Gamov, 1894; Sieroszewski, 1896; Sakaki, 1903; Bogoras, 1910; Vitashevsky, 1911; Anuchin, 1926; Shreibler, 1927; Shirokogoroff, 1929; Shternberg, 1936; Petrov, 1960; Grigoryeva, 1996).

The reduction in AH must be attributed to the considerable improvement in living conditions throughout the twentieth century30. Prehistoric life in a tundra-like climate, then, must have been compromised by even more severe AH.

What remains unknown outside the Russian literature is the connection between AH and music. AH sufferers sing, first quietly, then more excitedly, swinging hands and shivering (Jochelson, 1910, p. 31). Their songs comprise a special genre—menerik yryata (crazy songs)31—characterized by a confusion of identity and consciousness: the singer haphazardly switches between multiple identities in dialogic singing, with incoherent words and intense timbral modulations (tremolo, rasping, falsetto), raving-like, occasionally shrieking, moaning, and clapping in metric disarray (Alekseyev, 2008). Sufferers report hearing songs of evil spirits, and can ameliorate their suffering by singing the evil spirits' songs, to vent the spirits out (Vitashevsky, 1911, p. 188).

Examples-10/11

Ex.10. Reproduction of menerik yrya, usually performed during the attacks of meneriyi by the anonymous old Yakut from Tattinskii ulus. He described his singing later as a reaction to seeing an evil spirit abaasy in the corner of his yurt and, causing him shriek in deep fear, trying to scare the spirit away. His yelling is interspersed with singing out the lines, supposedly pronounced by abaasy. Characteristic is the “dialogic” representation of at least two characters (http://chirb.it/tIandL).

Ex.11. Another menerik yrya, imitated by Vissarion Gavrilyev from the Maar settlement in Niurbinskii ulus - according to his experience of frequently witnessing meneriya of his neighbor, an old woman. The lyrics are more comprehensible than in the example above and present an argument between the patient and the spirit ichchi. The song is characterized by the alternations of a recitative-like excited singing/talking and brief tremolo motifs in a free metric setting, interrupted (rather than accompanied) by spontaneous clapping (http://chirb.it/mr28fk).

AH singing drastically contrasts with the stability of PS and its regular, endless repetitions of the same formula in a characteristic “personal” timbre. This opposition reveals the orderly power of PS and how crucial it is for survival in Arctic conditions. Continuous singing during long, solitary travel in the tundra prevents the rider from falling asleep and losing track of direction, or helps in surviving snowstorms (Krushanov, 1987, p. 234). PS keeps one's mind present under critical pressures.

In contrast, menerik loss of personal identity corresponds to suicidal behavior—e.g., running away and freezing to death (Nissen and Haggag, 1988)—supporting the indigenous beliefs that meneriya occurs when evil spirits invade one's soul. According to anamnesis, singing starts precisely during the attacks of such “possession” (Mitskevich, 1929). Although pathological singing clearly results from AH, there might be some feedback between the disruption of “normal” PS use and AH incidents. The Nanai, another PS ethnos, regard any mental disease as a “personality disorder” caused by the invasion of multiple spirits (Shimkevich, 1896)32. Culture is known to construct methods for handling common mental illnesses, which often include music (Robertson-DeCarbo, 1974). If music can heal, it should also have the power to aggravate—PS disfunction could contribute to AH.

Another musical-psychological anomaly, common in Siberia even now, is tyyl yryata33—sleep-singing, caused by extreme exhaustion or distress, especially when these are chronic. It resembles sleep-talking and can last for hours until the sleep-singer awakes (Jochelson, 1910, p. 13:37). Locals do not consider this a disease (Mitskevich, 1929, p. 10).

Examples-12/13

Ex.12. Genuine tyyl yrya, captured by Eduard Alekseyev from an overnight recording of Prokopii Sleptsov from the settlement Druzhina, Abyiskii ulus. Upon listening to this recording, Sleptsov remembered his dream of hunting a moose, but could not recognize the language of his singing (presumably, Yukaghir, a native tongue of his mother, that he later forgot). Singing is based on a brief descending gliding motif consisting of 2 pitches (degrees), possibly with a third complementary degree (http://chirb.it/086zkG).

Ex.13. Reproduction of tyyl yrya of an old woman, a relative of the famous Yakut singer, Luka Turnin, who had overheard her singing on numerous occasions. The song is based on the repetitions of a brief formula of 6 tones, engaging 3 pitches (degrees) - most likely a personal motif of the old woman. The lyrics complain about disappointing the barn-master spirit, and promise to please the spirit with a gift (http://chirb.it/cg0cvL).

The formulaic structure of tyyl yrya suggests that it constitutes a deeply ingrained PS, “automatically” reproduced by the sleeper. Perhaps tyyl yrya is a byproduct of the hyper-activation of the self-identifying circuit that attempts to cope with a stressful exertion, whereas menerik yrya reflects the failure of such coping. This would confirm Jochelson's observation that sleep-singing relates to meneriya.

In indigenous Yakut culture, there are numerous vocal genres dedicated to meditative psychological self-regulation in stressful situations: kögus yryata (pain-reducing songs), enelgen yrya (complaining songs), and sulanyy yryata (dying songs), which are collectively described as uiulga yrya (singing for mental endurance) (Dyakonova and Grigoryeva, 2017).

In Arctic conditions, the significance of PS is truly “Cartesian”: “I sing; therefore I am” (Sheikin, 2002, p. 330). Loss of PS amounts to “disintegration.”

Musically, a PS reflects one's affiliation with a kin and territory (Sheikin, 1996, p. 12). Specific intonations, rhythms, and timbres characterize specific geographic locations and kin groupings (Novik, 2004, p. 80). Comparative musicological analysis of PSs allows for identification of one's genealogical tree in Samoyed cultures (Niemi et al., 2004). The need for geographic tagging originates in the custom of taking a wife from neighboring ethnoses (Goltsova et al., 2005); territorial PS markers prevent incestuous marriage (Aizenshtadt, 1982). Patriarchic lineage determines the wife's social identification through her symbolic “rebirth,” in which she loses membership in her birth kin upon adoption by her husband's kin (Sagalayev and Oktiabr'skaya, 1990, p. 18). Kin membership legitimizes a human being (Tyukhteneva, 2015). In such a system, the absence of PS amounts to “excommunication” from traditional society and the patronage of supernatural forces.

The Concept of Musicality in Timbre-Based Music

The existential cardinality of PS increases the value of musicality. In Western societies, a lack of musical abilities bears no biological cost; amusiacs do not suffer damage to their social life (Patel, 2010, p. 371–379). In PS cultures, however, amusia is costly.

Most traditional indigenous societies engage all members in active music production, since musical deficiencies pose serious obstacles to “normal” social interaction (van der Schyff, 2013). Like speech, music-making fuels autopoiesis—ongoing biological self-organization that optimizes the antithesis “I”-“non-I” to support one's autonomy (Maturana and Varela, 1980). Essentially, this is no different from the formative role of musical communication in the cognitive development of an infant (Cross, 1999). The absence of such communication endangers the psycho-emotional well-being of the child (Malloch and Trevarthen, 2009).

Inability to sing one's PS is perceived in indigenous societies as a handicap that requires family assistance. That is why, in Chukotka, those incapable of singing have their relatives sing their PS for them (Dyakonova, 2015). According to Siberian mythology, aphonia distinguishes dead souls from the living, and losing one's voice to a spirit equals death (L'vova et al., 1989, p. 90). Through its association with breathing, voice is considered an immanently live object capable of “invading” a person and “subduing” his/her mind (Pashina et al., 2005, p. 50). This is of special concern for shamans, who frequently imitate the voices and personal songs of dead people. Hence, using a “correct” voice is crucial for personal and societal well-being, and in some communities traditions call for the very old and sick to stay silent during public rituals (Dorokhova, 1995).

Unsurprisingly, in PS cultures the standard of vocal musical proficiency is decidedly low. Sieroszewski expressed discontent at “voiceless” Yakuts, who were always singing their “endlessly repeated monotonous tunes,” “pleasant only to [the] performer,” and “annoying like [a] mosquito buzz” (Sieroszewski, 1896, p. 569). His annoyance is evidence that contemporaneous Polish and Russian folksong standards, influenced by the classical bel canto, exceeded the Yakuts' in aesthetic demands. Frequency orientation and the absence of PS in Russian folksong enabled the bel canto influence, propping up its underlying idea of the necessity for “musical gift” and “proper” education. Such an attitude pushes toward exclusiveness of musicking and its professionalization. PS, on the contrary, promotes inclusiveness34.

Timbral music does not observe “wrong notes”: informants are puzzled by questions about musical mistakes, as they believe that any expression is “right” (Ojamaa, 2003). In addition, intervals in timbral-based cultures are not fixed, as they are in frequency-based cultures, but are stretchable (ekmelic) depending on the singer's emotional state (Nikolsky, 2015). A performer, when repeating a song, sets the same lyrics to varying pitches, unaware of pitch discrepancies despite a fine musical ear that is evident whenever he/she sings other styles of music. Indefinite pitch certainly reduces to a minimum the demand on musical skills necessary for a “decent” performance.

A PS can be exceedingly simple, performable by virtually anyone.

Example-14

Personal song of a Nenets old woman, Utchi, from the Kazym river region, covered with taiga (courtesy of Triinu Ojamaa). The melodic contour of this song's formula is exceedingly simple—engaging only 3 degrees within the range of only 274 cents: the lowest (228–231 Hz), the middle (249–252 Hz), and the highest (c. 254-267 Hz) degrees (http://chirb.it/0wM28B).

Structurally, a PS consists of “leitmotif” and “leittimbre”35—a reused motif and timbral quality. One family's PS can be distinguished from another's by its timbral style (Ojamaa, 2002). Musical elements that stay intact in all uses of a PS represent the PS's owner (musical “foreground”). Elements that change represent the circumstances of his activities (“background”): e.g., riding engages a different rhythm than fishing in an otherwise identical PS. Together, foreground and background define the position of an individual in space and time—indispensable in the solitary conditions and open spaces of Siberia.

Discrimination between foreground and background features requires the perception of thematicity—musical material that constitutes a theme (Mazel, 1979, p. 150–5)36. Although thematic analysis evolved within Western classical music (Réti, 1951)37, it should nevertheless be extended to all types of music (Val'kova, 1992)—like the Greek thema (proposition), which emerged in rhetoric theory and therefore suits any application related to semiotic representation where the perceiver needs to remember a particular expression essential for a musical work (Drabkin, 2001). Matters are complicated by the theme's salience. It might fall anywhere between two poles: “concentrated” (e.g., symphony) or “dispersed” (prelude) (Val'kova, 1992, p. 33)—as of the case in centonization in plainchant (Treitler, 2007). Timbral music also utilizes themes of various salience; JH players “compose” by developing selected thematic material38.

PS culture relies on monothematicism: “personal leitmotif-leittimbre” represents the same person. PS users identify themes intuitively, without conscious differentiation between melody and lyrics, but nevertheless associate musical sameness with personality, and verbal diversity with environmental circumstances (Ojamaa and Ross, 2004). Worth noting is that altering a PS's melodic contour constitutes a change of ownership between family members, but altering a PS's words does not (Ojamaa, 2002). A person sings one's PS without words when no contextual reference is needed, only a personal reference, such as missing a dear relative. However, changing words per se is considered changing the music. Typically, asking one to sing “another song” results in retexting the same monotheme. Only upon request to “sing like someone else” would a singer switch from that monotheme to the PS of the person mentioned (Alekseyev, 1988, p. 163–65).

“Timbral musicians” parse songs primarily by lyrics—not surprisingly, since phonemic oppositions constitute the timbral domain (Ojamaa and Ross, 2011)—rather than by pitch, like “frequency musicians” and non-musicians (Bonnel et al., 2001)39. Lyric-based parsing is common for Western infants (Lebedeva and Kuhl, 2010). Centering on lyrics generally characterizes the initial stage of acquisition of vocal musical skills (Welch, 1994). The earliest children's non-imitative singing surprisingly resembles an ekmelic PS with its stretchable intervals, formulaic structure with retexted lyrics, and private musicking to accompany various activities (Moog, 1976; Dowling, 1984; Bjørkvold, 1992; Campbell, 1998; Barrett, 2011; Koops, 2012). By 7 months, infants can differentiate the timbre of complex tones (Trehub et al., 1990) and remember timbre-specific information (Trainor et al., 2004).

If PS processing requires skills available to normal 1 to 2-year-old children, then amusia in timbral music societies must be virtually non-existent. Indeed, native PS-processing skills are widespread and effective. There are accounts of Siberian non-musicians retaining memory of a once- heard PS for decades (Novik, 2003). Timbral music culture is definitely designed to support this personal thematicism. Niemi et al. (2004) considers the absence of collective singing and instrumental pitch-based accompaniment among Northern autochthons a consequence of the identification functionality of PS40.

Jaw Harp (JH) as a Principal Musical Instrument of Eurasian Timbre-Based Music

Ps provides a model for the “musicalization” of other sounds. Animal calls, wind, rain, etc., all are regarded as the “personal voices” of natural objects, and are characterized by specific timbres and pitch contours (Novik, 1999). Like human PSs, their monotheme could take different shapes to provide information about their “whereabouts”: e.g., Evens distinguish between the sad, angry, and happy “talk” of the fire in a fireplace. Moreover, “fire-talking” is believed to interact with human speech (i.e., respond to human conversation). Every environmental/household object could interact with humans. And this subjects them to the same “personalization” as humans.

Most Siberian phono-instruments (Sheikin, 2002, p. 46–67) possess their own “PS”: flask, spoon, or cane, each is easily recognizable by its sound. Environmental sounds too represent “personal owner-spirits.”

Examples-15/16

Ex.15. Vyvko—the Nenets buzzer used to imitate wind. In the past this had to do with the rituals of calling on rain, but now it is primarily a children toy, promptly made from a thread and a button (http://chirb.it/mcGarg).

Ex.16. Symysky—the Khakass male maral call, made from a piece of birch bark (http://chirb.it/8zt1tw).

To a human, such instrumental “PSs” form an “objective” sound-scene collectively representing the surroundings.

And, here, the JH emerges as the simplest archaic instrument capable of producing multiple “PSs” of natural objects—it is universally renowned for its onomatopoeia capacity (Maslov, 1911; Beliayev, 1933; Le Roux, 1950, p. 2:507–8; Picken, 1957, p. 186; Koizumi et al., 1977; Alekseyenko, 1988; Zagretdinov, 1997; Bulgakova, 2001; Sermier, 2002, p. 103; Alexeyev and Shishigin, 2004; Mamcheva, 2005; Canave-Dioquino et al., 2008; Yesipova et al., 2008; Suzukei, 2010; Kartomi, 2012, p. 159).

Example-17

Temir-khomus (Altaic JH) is imitating something that human voice cannot—the sound of the water stream, Tuva (http://chirb.it/aa35p2).

Onomatopoeic versatility explains JH's popularity amongst children, which reflects their desire (typical in traditional societies) to resemble adults41.

Onomatopoeic vocalizations play an important role in early verbal acquisition (Menn and Vihman, 2011). Onomatopoeic words are easier to spot, remember, and comprehend (Laing, 2017). Similarly, onomatopoeic sounds facilitate comprehension of JH music, help in mastering the JH, and model new expressive means. The sounds one makes in learning the JH are no different than the babbling that comes from an infant learning to talk; both are playful explorations of the phonemic variants of a selected articulation (Davis and MacNeilage, 1995). The frame/content theory explains not only the acquisition of speech (Davis and Zajdo, 2008) but also of JH playing. If the vocal apparatus constitutes the infant's first “sound-toy” (Papoušek and Papoušek, 1995), for many timbral-based cultures the JH is the second. The “frame” of each JH syllable is filled with selective spectral content according to the same principles of phonetic symbolism that govern verbal acquisition (Shinohara and Kawahara, 2010).

The universal semantic values of ideophones and phonaesthemes (Svantesson, 2017), especially in vowels (Fischer-Jørgensen, 1978), apply to JH articulations. Thus, [i] implies nearness, narrowness, forwardness; [a] broadness, openness; front vowels tenderness, clarity, luminosity; back vowels firmness and concreteness42. Many associate sounds with colors/tints.

Example-18

The comparative demonstration of the principal khomus articulations: (a) front vs. (b) back, (c) high vs. (d) low vowels—performed by Ivan Alekseyev. Each of these 4 “poles” of JH articulations is characterized by salience of a particular register in generating a respective “JH formant”: 2.4–3.1 kHz for “front,” 0.3–1.6 kHz for “back,” 1.2–2.5 kHz for “‘high,” and 0.6–0.9 kHz for “low” vowels. The most similar are the “back” and “low” vowels, distinguished by greater intensity of the lowest 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th harmonics of the “back” vowel versus the “low” vowel which has much narrower bandwidth of its lowest formant (http://chirb.it/Az51G7).

“Front” syllables are described as tense and unpleasantly “tart.”

Example-19

“Front” syllables alone. They require tension in throat, face, lips, jaw, cheeks and tongue—isolating the mouth chamber. Erkin Alekseyev, a distinguished khomus player and the director of the research department at the International Museum of Jaw Harp at Yakutsk, describes his sensations while playing or hearing this articulation as though tasting an extremely sour apple (http://chirb.it/HNwHpq).

“Back” syllables feel pleasantly relaxed.

Example-20

“Back” syllables. They require relaxation in vocal apparatus. Erkin Alekseyev describes his sensations as “comfortable” to the extent of feeling “lazy” (http://chirb.it/MCzDkN).

“High” syllables resemble “smiling,” from joyful to sarcastic.

Example-21

“High” syllables. They resemble “front” articulation, except that facial muscles remain relaxed. Erkin Alekseyev experiences this configuration as though “smiling” to oneself as in a situation when finding something funny. Emotionally, this state can be charged with joyfulness/playfulness (positive) or sarcasm (negative) – depending on how strained the larynx is (http://chirb.it/n7z749).

“Low” syllables are experienced as “sublime,” yet constrained.

Example-22

“Low” syllables. They strongly activate the soft palate, configuring it into a “cupola.” Majority of khomus performers associate it with the sound of a big church-bell—and imagine something sublime and lofty while playing or listening to it. Like “high syllables,” sensing “low syllables” can appear “positive” or “negative”—depending on whether it is accompanied by the exertion of larynx and the discomfort resulting from this (http://chirb.it/6Iy1z8).

JH musicking explores a subject by chaining such elementary “meanings,” interspersed with the referential meanings of onomatopoeic devices. In syyia tardy, expressing oneself via the JH is preferable to speaking/singing whenever one feels unclear about something and tries to figure out his/her attitude toward it. JH proficiency enables one to pick any thematic idea and track it, exploring one's emotional state—akin to self-directed speech, yet addressing subjects that are too intangible for verbal expression.

Example-23

Demonstration of a typical session of “playing for oneself” on Yakut khomus by Ivan Alekseyev (http://chirb.it/bg32m9).

Numerous North Asiatic ethnicities did not develop frequency-based musical instruments, probably because the JH satisfies the need for an objective reference frame and the PS for a subjective frame, thus leaving no void to fill.

Complementarity of PS and JH Playing in Timbre-Based Music Cultures

The JH presents a counterpart to the PS. Onomatopoeia, citations of popular melodies, the use of conventional genre and stylistic features, and a “storytelling” compositional approach, common among JH players, all elaborate on environmental objects. Moreover, the JH is “anti-personal”: it replaces the player's natural voice.

The JH's lamella makes women, men, the old, and the young sound the same despite all their physical differences. Its capacity to conceal the most telling source of personal information, the human voice, while supporting diverse mimicking, reflects the JH's power to “objectivize” sound. The camouflaging capacity of the JH goes a long way—it even allows aphoniacs to emit sounds (Shimomura, 2016).

Despite its “chameleonic” nature and different constructions, the JH remains easily recognizable (Ledang, 1972). Its “proprietary” timbre is evident in the practice of vocally imitating the JH with help from the fingers, a popular activity among Altai children (Fomin, 2018). Paradoxically, the “proprietary” timbre does not impede the imitation of other timbres; the JH makes an effective vocoder (Leipp, 1963). The lamella-generated tone provides a “carrier signal,” and the vocal apparatus, a “modulator filter.” What is unusual is the hybridization of different domains: the JH's modulator is human, while the carrier is instrumental.

• The JH is not an ordinary musical instrument that produces a desired tone, it is a musical “centaur”: an organically indivisible human-instrument (Alekseyev, 1991b).

All JH constructions are “centauric”: their instrumental component determines the frequency, while the vocal component—its amplification/attenuation (Dournon-Taurelle and Wright, 1978, p. 21). Since personalization comes largely from the vocal component, the JH becomes “impersonal.” Totally unlike the PS, the JH hides the player's identity, whether in romantic serenading, shamanic rites, animistic hunting rituals, or children's pretend-games.

Vocoding generally relates to hiding. Electric vocoders were invented for ciphering military telecommunications to conceal the speaker's identity (Tompkins, 2010). In popular music, vocoders surfaced in urban genres that replaced a “humanistic” expression with a “robotic” one; they also penetrated other genres to conceal a singer's personal traits (gender, ethnos, class, age) that were perceived as potential vulnerabilities (Dickinson, 2001). Likewise, in animistic societies the JH reduces the risk of the player being identified and hurt while coming in touch with “spirits” (Popov, 1949, p. 265). In modern societies, the JH protects against eavesdropping (Morgan, 2008).

• The JH remedies the undesired ramifications of PS usage.

However, the JH offers a workaround for its camouflaging: it supports personalization through pitch contours rather than timbres. In the Russian Far East, a player engages individualized patterns, each of which exposes the JH “voice” in its own way—often enabling the recognition of a particular player (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 223). This applies to other Siberian instruments as well. The Udege perceive typical instrumental patterns as the “personal songs” of a specific instrument (Sheikin, 1982). JH patterns constitute “motifs” of “timbral music,” equivalent to PS motifs; the equivalence becomes apparent whenever the JH borrows thematic material from a song (Sheikin, 2002, p. 7).

Examples-24/25

Ex.24. “Hyttya-hyttya, syrdyk kγmmγt” (Summer is coming), Yakut folk song, sung by Fedora Gogoleva, describes a bright sun looking out from the skies and sending its warmth to mark the beginning of summer. The song is based on a simple 3-degree formula with regular dance-like rhythm in the degeren style. However, timbrally, music stays in the tangalai yryata style — “palatal singing,” where tongue is abruptly pushed to the soft palate while taking a loud inspiration (http://chirb.it/vpnhv1).

Ex.25. “Hyttya-hyttya, syrdyk kγmmγt” improvisation on khomus, Fedora Gogoleva. The same performer takes the melodic formula of the song above (Ex.24) and elaborates its motifs/articulations (naigryshi), arranged to form a proprietary JH composition that is intended to express joy and happiness. The JH version loses the traits of “palatal singing,” but keeps the degeren style rhythm (http://chirb.it/dp391O).

JH personalization must have emerged after its vocoding capacities became established. As archaic cultures lose their animistic ideology, musical instruments turn into producers of a specific musical arrangement, purposed for a specific application, thereby obtaining distinct semantic value and becoming “informative” about their creator (Novik, 1998). Thus, Mansi use instrumental patterns along with PS to display the birthplace/kin of Bear Festival participants (Tchernetsov, 1971, p. 110). Mansi and Khants conduct annual riverboat races where musician crew-members perform patterns representing the locations through which the boat passes (Sheikin, 1990, p. 8–9).

Each musical instrument embodies a particular gesture abstracted from the performing motion, plus the timbre abstracted from that instrument's sound—to form a new modus of musical thinking (Zemtsovsky, 1987). Like any instrument, a musical instrument is a technological tool for the (re)-production of a desired sound/texture43. To earn the reputation of a folk instrument for a certain ethnos, the instrument must execute a culturally important function (Stockmann, 1987).

Ainu, Ulch, Evenki, and Indonesian JHs are surprisingly similar in construction, sound, and technique (Duvan, 2003). So are Udmurt, Bashkir, Tatar, and Komi JHs of the Kama region (Aleksandrova, 2017). Nearly identical are the ancient Japanese and modern Nivkh and Karelian JHs (Wright, 2001). Intercultural contacts can hardly explain the commonalities among areas so remote from one another, as attempted by Fischer (1986, p. 156). A more likely explanation is the psycho-acoustic properties of the JH. There are four transcultural traits of JH music:

• Onomatopoeic imitations in “musicking for oneself,” discussed above;

• Concealing the identity of a “serenader”44 or his/her message from bystanders45 (Hauser-Schäublin, 1995; McLean, 1999, p. 265; Hsu, 2001; Levin and Suzukei, 2006, p. 116–17; Canave-Dioquino et al., 2008; Kartomi et al., 2008; Matusky, 2008; Sam, 2008; Uchida and Catlin, 2008);

• “Transporting” shamans to the other world (Agapitov and Khangalov, 1885; Czaplicka, 1914; Vasilevich, 1969; Galaiskaya, 1973; Rouget, 1985, p. 126; Alekseyenko, 1988; Vainshtein, 1991; Suleimanova, 1994; Maskarinec, 1995, p. 192; Duvan, 2000; Solomonova, 2000; Pegg, 2001; Sarangerel, 2001; Yousof, 2004, p. 70–71; Canave-Dioquino et al., 2008; Honeychurch, 2015, p. 19; Chuluunbaatar, 2016; Tadagawa, 2017b);

• “Supernatural” protection (Popov, 1949, p. 265; Dyakonova, 1981; Dobzhanskaya, 1991; Pegg, 2001; Tadagawa, 2017b)46.

Common to all four traits is the representation of multiple entities by a single JH “voice.”

The JH acts like a wild card, adopting different identities to benefit the player. For hunters, the JH attracts prey by imitating their sound (Alekseyenko, 1988), or by pleasing the master-spirit of a particular place to get his favor (Galdanova, 1987). For sweethearts, the JH unites them by appropriating the other's articulations (Haid, 1999). For children, the JH presents unlimited make-believe impersonations (Yekeyeva, 2014). All these applications disregard the player's identity and focus on the impersonation act using the JH as a “fit-all” entity. The JH's vocoding nature empowers it.

In archaic cultures, the JH opposes the PS mainly through the implementation of privacy:

• PS aims at an individual by referencing his unique voice to him and his relatives/countrymen;

• The JH aims at the environment by reproducing and thereby appropriating its voices, attaining harmony through “centauric magic.”

Self- and world-orientations complement each other. Not accidentally, the JH and PS share the same territory (Figures 1, 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Russian Ural, Siberia, and Far East administrative regions where JH is the principal musical instrument. Such regions are colored beige. This figure displays the area of dominance of the indigenous Eurasian JH traditions according to the current ethnographic data. This area is confined to Russian territory. The names of those ethnicities that favor JH in the scarce musical instrumentarium are colored blue—altogether, 21 ethnicities. Each ethnicity name in the map reflects the areas of that ethnicity's greatest concentration. The only region where the importance of JH tradition remains on par with indigenous ethnicities of Russian Ural, Siberia and Far East (blue names) is Austronesia. Orange color marks those ethnicities that are either losing the JH tradition altogether (e.g., Chukchi) or retain it but of diminished overall significance due to great versatility of folk musical instruments (Tatars). The territories outside of Russia where JH music continues to occupy an important cultural role (approximating those of the orange-marked names of Russian ethnicities) include neighboring Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Northern Afghanistan, Northwestern China and Hokkaido (not marked on this map). The names for JH in indigenous languages are listed in English by Bakx and Crane (2017) and in Russian, by Galaiskaya (1987), and in the encyclopedia of musical instruments (Yesipova et al., 2008).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Russian Ural, Siberia and Far East administrative regions where PS is still practiced. Such regions are colored pink. The names of those ethnicities that have preserved PS well are colored blue. Ethnicities that are losing their PS tradition are marked orange. The tradition of PS retains its social significance (blue names) only on the territories of modern Russian Federation. Outside of Russia, this tradition survives amongst Amerindian tribes of the northeastern US and Canada (Ojamaa, 2002) (not marked on this map). This tradition existed amongst Ainu (Sheikin, 1996; Novik, 1999). The indigenous names for PS are: northern Mansi eryg, southern Mansi erei, Enets barae, Nganasan baly, Evenk ikaee (singer's PS) and alma (PS of close relatives or friends), Amur Nivkh lu, Sakhalin Nivkh lund, Ainu yayan yuukara, Chukchi chinitkin grep, Koryak sinkin ulikul (nominal song), and ikoleyavan kuli (kin-song) (Sheikin, 1996), Kerek kuligul, Even tiinmei (singer's PS), alma (someone else's PS) and ikaan (“cover” PS that has turned into a popular song), northern Khanty ar, central Khanty arae, eastern Khanty lulpany, Nenets khybants (Sheikin, 2002). Comparison of Figure 1 and this figure demonstrates that PS and JH are shared by Mansi, Khanty, Selkups, Kets, Yughs, Kamasins, Evens, Dolgans, Evenks, Yakuts, Udege, Yukagirs, Chukchi, Kereks, Chuvans, Koryaks, Itelmens, Nivkhs, Ulchi, Nanai, Negidals and possibly Ainu. Of them all, Mansi, Khanty, Evens, Udege, Nivkhs, Itelmens and Koryaks have retained both traditions well. Area of their traditional habitat—the Urals, the Arctic Circle, Chukotka, Kamchatka, Okhotsk Coast, Sakhalin and Primorye—must delineate the stronghold of “timbre-oriented music.” Prior to the Russian colonization and Chinese cultural influences, which have both been spreading out the “frequency-oriented music,” this stronghold most probably included also Eastern, Western and Southern Siberia, where today both traditions, of JH and PS, are relatively weak.

Animistic Roots of Timbre-Based Music

Initially, the JH worked like a talisman, connecting its owner with a supernatural force via “magic contract” (Novik, 1998). The first JHs were most likely made from grass, e.g., the Nivkh konga-chnyr (Mamcheva, 2005); tree twigs, such as the Altaian/Tuvan taia/yyash-khomus (Modorov and Dvornikov, 2015); and splinters, such as the Yakut mas-khomus (Sheikin, 2002, p. 119). It is exceedingly easy to make such instruments, even for a child; the materials are gathered rather than manufactured. The antiquity of JHs can be deduced from myths ascribing the invention of the JH to a bear—a totemic ancestor for numerous Siberian ethnoses (Startsev, 2017)47.

The JH might have originated from the “aeolian harp”—its eerie sounds produced by wind hitting a splintered tree (Duvan, 2003). Siberians believe that lightning purifies trees that it strikes, and items made of their wood have protective power (Suzukei, 1991). Additional protection came from totemic phytomorphism: thus, Nivkhi drew their ancestry from larch, Ulchi from cedar, Oroks from birch, and Ainu from fir (Duvan, 2003). Plants were believed to breathe and, therefore, to possess a soul, possibly to even have PSs, just like animals (L'vova et al., 1989, p. 89). Live creatures could have PS.

Example-26

“Personal song” of reindeer Urdy, performed “on behalf of him” by his owner, Valentina Kosterkina, in Nganasan. The lyrics describe reindeer's exhaustion from work, complaints on a dog that likes to bite his legs and anticipation of a good rest (Dobzhanskaya 2014, p. 124) (http://chirb.it/M46DrK).

Personalized songs and instrumental patterns are also assigned to spirits to attract their attention, and even musically reflect the mythological family relations between spirits (Gemuyev and Sagalayev, 1986, p. 68). “Spiritual” Ugric PSs were transcribed by Sheikin (1990). They were used to call a patronizing spirit for healing (Voldina, 2017).

Ancestor cults dominated most of Asia. Like mountains, rivers, and animals, plants too were believed superior to humans and could be totemic ancestors. Even today, Khakassian and Altaic kin groups consider larch and birch their ancestors (Sagalayev and Oktiabr'skaya, 1990, p. 50–59). Myths tell of trees nourishing or giving birth to human kin-founders (Tadysheva, 2018). A dying nearby tree is seen as prediction of death for someone from a corresponding kin: for Jyc, fir, Kuzen pine, Komdosh birch, Tubalar aspen, and Todosh honeysuckle (Kypchakova, 2006). Cutting ancestral trees is still taboo in Altai. Trees were actually used to trace genealogical “trees”: thus, Irkit kin drew their origin from father-honeysuckle and mother-birch (Potanin, 1883, p. 7).

Zoo/phytomorphic ancestors are depicted on the Uralic metallic disks, 1st millennium BCE, from the Khanty-Mansi Museum (Gemuyev, 2000, p. 63–64); one of them depicts a “plant-woman,” identified by ethnographers as mythological Por's ancestress, birthed by a bear after eating poryg (Heraclium sibiricum) (Tchernetsov, 1971, p. 91–93). Poryg and similar herbs are commonly used for making musical instruments in Siberia (Sheikin, 2002, p. 4–7); these are sacred for Por people. Such instruments probably served as kin talismans before becoming regional musical instruments (Vasilyev, 2016). Kongon (Leymus), used for grass JH-making, was also mythologically anthropomorphized into a woman (Kreinovich, 1928, p. 192), and was possibly ancestral to some kin.

Trees serve as kin markers for South Siberian Turks (Sagalayev and Oktiabr'skaya, 1990, p. 43), who distinguish an individual by membership in seok48 (kin) and believe that the bones of co-members are made of the same “wood” type. Following the tree/forest paradigm, each person corresponds to some tree, and his kin to the same tree-species—in the forest that represents the entire ethnos (53–54). The correspondence of people-grouping to tree-grouping is also observed among Ugric ethnicities (57). In the 2010 census, 82 seoks were registered in the Altai Republic (Tyukhteneva, 2015). Standard Altaic identification includes a totemic animal, tree, and mountain (Tadysheva, 2016).

Within this identification system, a plant-made JH would represent an individual, kin, or birthplace by the instrument's “voice.” Initially purely timbral, such identification eventually became “melodic,” engaging personal patterns. This development likely came about through vocoding. Since a wife is considered estranged to her husband's kin even after marriage, and is tabooed to call her husband's totemic entities by name49 (Tadysheva, 2018), articulating names on a JH or onomatopoeically hinting at them would circumnavigate the taboo. This could explain the female affiliation of the JH among many Ural-Altaic ethnicities. As a rule, men married foreign women (Pakendorf, 2007), who then became restrained by the taboo. Most archaeological finds of JHs in Ural vicinities come from personal belongings in female burials (Aleksandrova, 2017). Across Eurasia, the JH is one of few artifacts typical for burials, indicating the JH's connection to the supernatural and ancestral (Oleszczak et al., 2018). In the Far East, the JH is still used in lamentations for deceased ancestors (Sheikin, 2002, p. 364).

The ubiquity of the JH in Asia can be explained by its shamanic use (Emsheimer, 1986). Shamanism constitutes a unified religious system in the entire Uralo-Siberian area (Alekseyev, 1992). Samoyedic female shamans still use a JH instead of a tambourine (Alekseyenko, 1988), the primary shamanic instrument across North Asia. Around 2000 BCE, the entire area from Bactria to China was strongly influenced by shamanism (Francfort, 1994).

In Altai, novice shamans are restricted to playing the JH until they achieve spiritual maturity (for some never achievable) and receiving a tambourine—a pattern reflecting the antiquity of the JH in shamanic practice (Vainshtein, 1991, p. 273). In Mongolia, shamans use a JH to initiate shamanic rituals and engage the tambourine only upon reaching a trance-state (Chuluunbaatar, 2016). This suggests that the JH's onomatopoeic and vocoding capacities make it more socially inclusive than the shamanic tambourine, as they do not require exceptional “supernatural” powers from the JH's user (Sheikin, 2002, p. 69–134). Surviving beliefs in the personal protecting capacities of the JH reveal its origin as an egalitarian “magic” tool, preceding the professionalization of shamanism and the establishment of the tambourine as one of its attributes.

JH musicking surpasses PS in its accessibility. Across northeastern Asia, toothless people use a hammer or ax to play JH (Tadagawa, 2017b).50 In Yakutia, the ax and JH are even welded together51. The JH is used as an aid in alalia (Everstova et al., 2019). Complete aphoniacs play the JH (Shimomura, 2016)—and probably have been doing so for a long time in the Far East. The usage of JH-like devices (koouchyntzyy) to aid in aphonia was recorded during the Song dynasty (Picken, 1957). Such “prosthetics” highlights JH's great importance in native cultures.

Together, a JH and a PS provide “axes of coordinates” in the animistic worldview. The PS defines the “subjective” aspect as follows (Sheikin, 2002, p. 255):

1) “Thus I sing” (individual);

2) “Thus my countrymen sing” (territorial);

3) “Thus my family sings” (genealogical).

These hierarchic levels also reflect an evolutionary progression, inferred from cross-examination of all existing Siberian traditions. Sheikin adopts the Even culture for a model, because it has retained all three levels (263–8)52. In the past, Chukchi observed a similar hierarchy53.

An analogous three-stage model applies to the JH, defining its “objective” aspect:

1) “This JH protects me in my environmental encounters” (individual);

2) “These onomatopoeic JH imitations control their original owners from my environment” (territorial);

3) “This JH style optimizes my kin's relationship with the environment” (genealogical).

This model might apply to other Siberian mouth- and phono-instruments.

The intra-cultural interaction of the PS and the JH promotes the emergence of JH patterns. Thus, Nivkh players often engage the same pattern for different compositions (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 222).

Examples-27/28

Ex.27. Nivkh JH PN by Vera Khein, as presented in her original improvisation which she named “The flatfish dance.” This piece, like many others that were recorded by Natalia Mamcheva from Vera Khein's, is based on her personal motif consisting of two descending intervals: of a 3rd and a 2nd (e.g., E-C-Bb), where the latter is often marked by the shorter rhythm of the middle tone (C) and its multiple repetitions, marking the lowest tone (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 297–300) (http://chirb.it/aIrCvG).

Ex.28. Nivkh JH PN by V.M. Persina, as presented in her improvisation (No. 130 from Appendix 1, Mamcheva, 2012, p. 301). It uses 2 motifs: of an ascending 2nd (passing C-D-E or auxiliary C-D-C) and of an ascending auxiliary 3rd (E-G-E), where C and E are marked as anchors, and the middle tones (D and E) are often given shorter rhythmic values (http://chirb.it/2L65H3).

Nivkhs also differentiate JH patterns by specific timbral words matched to a genre54 (Sheikin, 2002, p. 132).

Example-29

The Nivkh rhythmic formula “Kan Vai,” typical for various instruments and vocal music, in JH music is characterized by the onomatopoeic dog-like articulation of “khav-khav” (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 119). This formula distinguishes the genre of a dog-racing music, used in festive competitions that are held by Nivkhi, Ulchi, and Negidals. This genre is also used during the sacrifice of a dog in an annual bear festival (103) (http://chirb.it/q2xxbJ).

The amalgamation of non-onomatopoeic JH devices must have accompanied the historic development of PS: timbral themes prototyped timbral words. Many indigenous Siberian cultures employ specific vocables55 as ethnic/territorial markers (Sheikin, 2002, p. 251). Their timbral and rhythmic makeup could direct JH improvisation toward elaborating standards. Thus, Yakut khomusists frequently engage the timbral vocable “hyttya.” Timbral words comprise “timbral phrases,” employed as in magic incantations (Tchernetsov, 1987, p. 35)56. Animistic hierarchy somehow transforms into syntactic hierarchy.

As the traditional lifestyle modernized, animism and totemism lost relevance, along with the need for anonymity. Subsequently, playing the JH acquired melodic/rhythmic/timbral patterns idiosyncratic for a player. They differ from a PS by engaging a repertory of playing devices rather than a single monothematic device.

• The JH was preferable to the PS whenever timbral music was “about” an external (to the performer) “object” rather than an internalized “subject57.

• The JH's plurality matched an “objective” perspective, while the PS's singularity matched a “subjective” perspective with its single “self” (for a mentally healthy individual).

Jaw Harp Articulations vs. Singing and Speech

Musical and verbal vocalizations adopt opposite parsing strategies (Alekseyev, 1993):

• Comprehensibility of elements. Speech prioritizes the clarity of contrasts to mark discrete elements in the speech-flow. Division prevails through timbral contrasts (oppositions).

• Comprehensibility of gestalt-total (melody). Singing prioritizes the integration of sounds into a melodic line to secure an empathic response to it. Unification prevails through timbral similarities (equalization).

The JH's vocalization introduces tonal homogeneity and monotony. Both are considered detrimental to speaking and singing, reducing the intelligibility of their prosody. JH prosody is unaffected by this. It relies on contrasts only of the mid/high-frequency spectrum, confining monotony to FF.

In frequency-oriented cultures, singing requires timbral uniformity while stressing the FF changes (Titze, 1988). Voicing every consecutive utterance by definite pitch per se homogenizes the spectrum of sung tones58. Like singing, verbal intonation engages FF changes even in non-tonal languages (Ladd, 1996), while stressing spectral contrasts, as JH does.

• The JH combines singing and verbal approaches. Its monotony conceals the player's identity yet preserves all articulations: “timbral words” become monotonously “flattened.” Such “flattening” presents a form of timbral equalization similar to singing.

Both singing and speech vowels stress FF (Figure 3). But speech's clarity depends more on frequency changes of F1 and F2 (Zsiga, 2013) that are sufficient for distinguishing vowels (Carlson et al., 1970). Singing freezes F1 at about the same frequency level for all vowels (Sundberg, 1974).

• Singers intuitively match vowels. Speakers oppose them. So do JH players—but only in relation to the “residual tone,” not the “fundamental tone.”

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Characteristic acoustic features of the JH vowel articulations. This figure demonstrates the importance of harmonic structure for the JH vocal system. The numbers on the curves mark the harmonics. Vertical axis indicates amplitude, and horizontal frequency. (A) Power spectra of the vowel [a] performed on khomus, sung and spoken. (1) Khomus. There are 145 harmonics discernible above the noise floor, peaking at f9. (2) Singing (bass). There are 23 active harmonics, peaking at f1. (3) Speaking. There are 19 active harmonics, peaking at f1. Weakness of formants seems to be part of the indigenous Yakut prosody—judging by the recordings of native Yakut speakers we had at our disposal. In their number of active harmonics, position of the loudest harmonic and distribution of peaks (2) and (3) are harmonically closer to each other than to (1). JH reserves higher intensity for odd harmonics, as opposed to speaking and singing. The bandwidth of harmonics is significantly narrower for khomus than for singing and speaking. If to measure the bandwidth at the harmonic's baseline level, the khomus f2 occupies a range between 141 and 151 Hz, making 117 cents (a semitone). The f2 of the singing “A” ranges between 243 and 297 Hz (349 cents—a neutral third). And the f2 of the speaking “A” ranges between 197 and 238 Hz (325 cents—a narrower third). The last notable difference is a much smaller noisiness of the khomus “A”—easily detectable in the absence of the “furry” looking jiggles in the contour line. These jiggles are very prominent in the singing of “A” and even more so in the speaking of “A,” especially >f7. The recordings were made on the recorder Ritmix RR-989, with the sampling rate of 44.1 kHz and the bit depth of 16 bit, and analyzed by the software application RX Pro by iZotope with the following settings: 262144 samples FFT size, Hann window, 4x time overlap, average channel mode, 80 dB/s decay, extended log frequency scale. The peak at 15.6 kHz reflects a permanent background noise in the room. The analysis was the average of 4 versions of (1), (2) and (3). (B) Power spectra of “active harmonics” of all Yakut vowels articulated on Yakut khomus. The vowels are numbered according to their perceived “pitch values” in an ascending scale (Ogotoyev, 1988), according to the convention common amongst Yakut JH players—which generally coincides with the comparative vowel's height. JH's “instrumental formant,” F1, marked by the yellow rectangle, falls on f5 in all vowels except “Ü” and “I,” where F1 broadens to f3–f5. In contrast, “vocal formant,” F2, marked by the red rectangle, falls on different harmonics in 6 vowels: f13 for “O,” f17 for “A,” f23 for “Ö,” f19 for “Y,” f21 for “Ä,” and f21-f23 for “I.” Only 2 vowels, “U” and “Ü,” engage the same harmonics as, respectively, “O” and “Ö.” However, “U” differs from “O” by a smoother shape and consistent dynamic prevalence of odd over even harmonics (>f13). “Ü” differs from “Ö” by an even greater contrast of odd/even harmonics and louder high harmonics >f47. Altogether, the harmonic composition of F2 varies by the number of active harmonics, the ratio of the intensity of odd to even harmonics and the magnitude of dynamic “dropouts” amongst the adjacent harmonics in the harmonic series. Therefore, each vowel possesses its unique harmonic configuration of F2. The recording was made as in (A). The audio clip representing each vowel was selected out of a pool of 15 performances by 3 performers on 3 JHs based on averaging the dynamic values for the lowest 11 harmonics and finding the closest match to the average harmonic profile for each of the vowels.

The concept of “residual pitch” was introduced by Schouten (1940) and adopted by modern theories of harmonic perception (Goldstein, 1973; Terhardt et al., 1982; Moore et al., 1984, 1985, 1986; Houtsma and Smurzynski, 1990; Moore, 2012; Norman-Haignere et al., 2013). The sum of the unresolved partials that comprise “pitch residue” is perceived as a pitch identical to FF, but harsher in timbre (Schouten et al., 1962).

Unresolvability does not prevent pitch perception, because pitch can be analyzed by an alternative mechanism: through the autocorrelation of nervous impulses, activated by partials, in a phase (Licklider, 1951). Despite its complexity, such hearing is exceedingly common (Moore, 2012, p. 217). However, unlike FF recognition, it requires learning (Terhardt, 1974). Hence, periodicity recognition comprises a cultural phenomenon.

• JH prosody engages monotony to facilitate residual pitch analysis59.

• A drone-like FF turns into “background,” while changes in residue comprise “foreground” in an auditory scene analysis of JH music. Its users focus on the foreground and ignore the background.

• As in a PS, the unchangeable JH “background” represents the hidden “self.” The changeable “foreground” represents the “world.”

JH users distinguish one articulation from another most likely by learning and memorizing a number of “harmonic templates,” pairing them with the perceived sounds in a search for the best match (Goldstein, 1973). Such templates are formed by a long-term accumulation of statistical data, and tend to rely on the harmonic series (Shamma and Klein, 2000).

Musical templates might be influenced by phonological templates that are generated by the pitch analysis of the tonal attributes of speech (Schwartz et al., 2003). JHs made of organic materials usually deviate from the harmonic series in the tuning of partials. A JH can also omit a harmonic (usually f2), or generate a non-serial partial or a subharmonic (see Appendix-1 in Supplementary Material).

• JH's “centauric” nature makes JH's prosody hybrid (Alekseyev, 1991b).

The equalized FF portion of the JH spectrum resembles the singing formant (Sundberg, 1974), while JH's “residue” portion, in contrast, marks every opposition of phonemes. Hence, the JH can “talk” AND “sing” sequentially as well as simultaneously. JH prosody engages two different domains, vocal and instrumental, where the vocal controls the dynamics and the instrumental the frequency of the harmonic components (Trias, 2010). Each domain introduces its own formant(s) (Figure 3):

1) F1 is instrumental; it homogenizes JH articulations and depends mostly on JH's construction.

2) F2 is vocal; it differentiates between JH articulations and depends mostly on the vocal tract configuration. Additional vocal formants are present at least in “high” vowels [i:].

JH vowels retain F1 at the same level (per instrument), but move vocal formants. Each vowel has its unique harmonic signature comprised of:

- the number of harmonics over the noise floor (“active” harmonics),

- their dynamic envelope within the spectrum,

- an odd/even harmonic ratio,

- the harmonic composition of formants.

The border between the “instrumental” and “vocal” ranges lies ≈f6–f8. Therefore, we must introduce a new concept of “harmonic base” to encompass f1–f4(f7) in contrast to “harmonic residue.”

JH formants differ from speech/singing formants for the same vowels (Leipp, 1967). A JH vowel engages six times more “active” (i.e., salient) harmonics than singing, and almost eight times more than speaking. F1 in the JH is much softer than in speaking and singing. The JH's F2 is much stronger. The JH's harmonics display a much greater odd/even contrast than singing/speaking vowels do. JH harmonics are much narrower in bandwidth and are compromised by less noise.

Harmonicity (Plack, 2010), which has no direct parallel to the JH for singing and is absent altogether from speech, is definitely crucial for JH prosody (Nikolsky et al., 2017). Very likely, harmonicity/inharmonicity forms the principal axis in the discrimination of JH articulations (Nikolsky, 2017). Indigenous users must have high sensitivity to the harmonic structure of sounds. Thus, Nanai believe that everything sung will certainly be heard by spirits who do not recognize human speech (Bulgakova, 2000). The harmonicity of singing could be responsible for this.

The hybrid nature of JH prosody poses the question: is it derivative of speech, like a grammelot (Jaffe-Berg, 2001); of singing, like a kazoo; or is it ancestral to both language and music?60

Establishing the Time and Place of Origin of Indigenous Eurasian JH Music Traditions

Archaeological evidence points to Inner Mongolia as JH's homeland (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Worldwide geographic distribution of archaeological finds of JH, dated prior to the fourteenth century, and of artifacts that depict faces performing “vocal articulations,” dated c.3000–100 BCE. This map is designed to reflect JH's distribution pattern throughout Eurasia prior to the fourteenth century—the beginning of JH mass production, trade inclusion and, subsequently, export to European colonies. Numbers in red reflect the chronological order of JH finds. Their dating and publication sources are referenced in Table 1. Circles mark the geographic clustering of finds and are accompanied by their dating range. Blue color marks JHs made of natural organic materials (bone, bamboo, wood), brown—of metallic JHs, and green—of mixed (organic and metallic). The most ancient finds cluster within the Inner Mongolia and are all organic. Next in timeline are Southern China and Altai, both of which also house organic JHs. Still next is the cluster covering Ural Mountains and Volga planes. It includes mixed materials. Two subsequent areas to the West, Ukraine and Northern Europe, feature exclusively metallic instruments. Manchuria and Japan form another cluster, concurrent with the Ukrainian, and feature mixed materials. The black face icon marks the archaeological sites containing petroglyphs, sculptures, masks or ceramics that depict human faces with open mouth—“singing masks” (Okladnikov, 1968, 1971; Okladnikov and Zaporozhskaya, 1972; Devlet, 1976, 1980; Okladnikov and Mazin, 1976; Brodianskii, 1978; Leontyev, 1978; Arkhipov, 1989; Kochmar, 1994; Devlet and Devlet, 2011)—exemplified in Figure 5. Most singing masks petroglyphs precede JH finds and concur with the Shuiquan JH in Inner Mongolia. The oldest petroglyphs are located at Sikachi-Alian, Amur, 3rd millennium BCE (Okladnikov, 1971, p. 83–89), and the most recent—the utmost northern location in Yakutia, at Olenek River (Arkhipov, 1989; Kochmar, 1994). Geographically, the locations of “singing masks” coincide with the JH finds in two regions: Tuva and Primorye, but chronologically precede the JHs excavated in those locations, suggesting that JH articulations grew out of timbral singing, probably of PS. Absence of “vocal articulations” in Inner Mongolia could be explained by the lack of attention of Chinese archeologists, not distinguishing such pictures from other images [in the same vein, Chinese archaeologists had difficulties recognizing JHs in the unearthed materials of a number of sites (Shulga, 2015; Kolltveit, 2016)]. On the other hand, absence of JH finds in Central and Southern Yakutia and Kamchatka, where images of “vocal articulations” were found, might be due to the wet climate that makes preservation of organic materials unlikely.

The oldest JH belongs to the Lower Xiajiadian culture, 2146–1029 BCE (Kolltveit, 2016). Its proximity to the Manchurian sites where the Neolithic “singing masks” were found (Okladnikov, 1971) indicates that JH articulations might have originated from timbral singing (Figure 5). “Singing masks” always stress the configuration of mouth, nose, and eyes in a single face, omitting the body; in contrast, the animalistic art of the neighboring Siberian cultures presents the entire animal, and usually in groups (Okladnikov and Mazin, 1979, p. 86). Each “mask” depicts a specific vocal articulation charged with an emotional expression that may represent an ancestral attribute (Sheikin, 2002, p. 259).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. “Singing masks” from Sikachi-Alyan, Amur river, dated c. 3000 BCE (Okladnikov, 1971, p. 83–89) and their phonetic interpretation. These 9 images were selected by Sheikin (2002, p. 259), who believed that they depicted pronunciation of vowels in order to perpetuate a model for articulating sacred names, important for the ancestor cult. Such images are found near Amur river along the border between modern Russia and China, and differ from most East-Northern Siberian petroglyphs by focusing on not animals, but humans. Specifically, these faces emphasize the configuration of open mouth and the emotional expression in an individualized manner where no one image reproduces any other image (Okladnikov, 1971, p. 85). Similar in style, “singing masks” are found in few isolated sites to the West of Primorye, in Tuva, and to its north, in Yakutia and Kamchatka, suggesting the enormous expansion of a Neolithic Far Eastern culture during the Bronze–Iron Ages (Andreyeva, 1987). Each mask could hint at a particular sacred word tabooed for public use—similar to the current practice in the Altai region. The vowel harmony, omnipresent in Uralic and Siberian languages (Kiyekbayev, 1972), especially strong in Turkic languages (Gadzhiyeva, 1997), in effect, encodes the configuration of the mouth for the entire word, since all its syllables are bound to reproduce the same vowel (e.g., Yakut miitary call “urui”). Sheikin's set of images is identified as pictorial representation of a vocal system of a hypothetical “Amuric” Paleo-Asiatic language by I. Seliutina, N. Urtegeshev, T. Ryzhykova and A. Dobrinina from the Laboratory of Experimental Phonetic Research at the Institute of Philology of the Siberian Department of the Russian Academy of Science. Based on the methodology of the founder of this institute, Nadeliayev (1960), this lab has collected an extensive database of articulations of basic phonemes of Siberian languages (Seliutina et al., 2012). Although the lack of uniformity in Neolithic images limits the researcher to estimate the gradations in labialization and only a gist of its palatability, however, Nadeliayev's classification of labialization (Nadeliayev, 1980) allows the phonologist to identify vowels based on the ratio of mouth width to height. The “Amuric” vocal system is presented in the phonetic alphabet developed after Nadeliayev by 9 of his pupils: I. Seliutina, A. Urtegeshev, A. Letiagin, A. Shevela, A. Dobrinina, G. Esenbayeva, A. Savelov, M. Rezakova, and Yu. Ganenko (Seliutina et al., 2012). The basic vowels from this alphabet are shown in a table at the bottom of the figure. The “singing masks” are numbered in the order of the ascending JH “articulatory scale” as formulated by Ogotoyev (1988), with the correction by Shishigin (2015) that places “o” rather than “a” at the bottom of the scale. The mask images (Sheikin, 2002) and the phonetic table (Seliutina et al., 2012) are reproduced by permission of the authors.

Modern Nanai tell myths about a Skull Horse-rider and paint burial idols' faces to house dead souls, closely resembling skull-like Sikachi-Alyan petroglyphs (Okladnikov, 1979). The Nanai habitat includes Manchuria, and the JH remains their principal instrument. “Singing masks” could capture the symbolic meaning of a particular articulation and assign it to an ancestral figure as its “call”—like an animal call ascribed to a totemic ancestor. The model for this could be military calls, urany, used by Turkic peoples to distinguish a kin (e.g., Yakut “urui!”) up until the nineteenth century (Sagalayev and Oktiabr'skaya, 1990, p. 21). Such calls were believed to possess supernatural power, making them suitable for the vocoding “protection.”

Vowel harmony characterizes most languages of the Altaic Sprachbund (Ko et al., 2014), especially of the Turkic language family (Gadzhiyeva, 1997). There, the Yakut vocal system (Antonov, 1997) is considered the most ancient, representative of proto-Turkic (Tenishev, 1984) and proto-Altaic languages (Tenishev, 1997). The acknowledged paleolinguistic studies date the break of proto-Altaic by 8000–10000 (Andreyev and Sunik, 1982), 7000 (Starostin, 1991), or 5000 BCE (Robbeets, 2015, p. 506)—earlier than the earliest of the Sikachi-Alyan images (Okladnikov, 1971, p. 83–89). “Singing masks,” then, could capture the articulation representing a totemically important meaningful “harmonic” word, such as “urui61.

“Singing masks” spread over Amur/Ussuri, Baikal, Lena, and Aldan, dated 3000–100 BCE (Okladnikov and Zaporozhskaya, 1972; Okladnikov, 1974; Devlet, 1976, 1980; Leontyev, 1978; Arkhipov, 1989). This distribution mostly coincides with the oldest archaeological JH finds and modern areas of greatest JH popularity. The northern Far East became culturally isolated around the Bronze Age and retained Neolithic traits until the seventeenth century Russian colonization (Andreyeva, 1987), effectively conserving the archaic traditions.

“Singing masks” are also depicted on Malyshevo ceramics, 2000 BCE (Okladnikov, 1968, p. 50). Similar Neolithic stone and clay masks were excavated in Primorye (Brodianskii, 1978). In Yenisei burials, near Sayan, “real” gypsum masks were found, manufactured ≈2000 BP, probably following some earlier tradition of mask-making from easily decomposing materials (Devlet and Devlet, 2011, p. 310–12). Nenets, Khanty, Mansi, Evenk, Udege, Kumandin, Shor, and Buryat shamanic masks likely represent the same tradition.

Closely related are tsam masks (335–37). Tsam is a theatrical ritual dance, performed in Lamaistic monasteries across Buryatia, Tuva, Tibet, Nepal, and Bhutan. To distinguish the tsam protagonists from each other, their masks express different emotions, assisted by melodies/rhythms that are specific for each protagonist. Shamans too accompany mask-wearing with vocal and theatric impersonations of evil or good spirits (Zabolotskaya, 2011). Instead of masks, Tuvan shamans use maskoids—small, mask-like plates, mounted on a hat or knitted, called “human face” (Devlet and Devlet, 2011, p. 313). Maskoids usually reproduce conventional face-masks and represent the ancestral spirits guarding the maskoid's owner (Avdeyev, 1960).

The mask's protective function (Ivanov, 1975) resembles JH's “masking”: both are employed by shamans to repel evil spirits.

“Singing masks” likely belong to the cultural Neolithic/Mesolithic “confederacy,” stretching from the Volga-Ural region to Tibet and China (Leontyev et al., 2006). Its influence may have extended farther to Southeast Asia and Oceania (Okladnikov, 1968, p. 52–64). In this entire area the bamboo/wooden JH remains the principal musical instrument.

Archaeological data confirms the vegetative origin of the JH. All BCE finds, except for Perm's, occurred in Asia (Table 1). The JH crossed the Urals into the Volga planes ≈200 BCE (Aleksandrova, 2017) thereafter heading toward Hungary and Ukraine. Finno-Ugric peoples might have carried the JH to Northern Europe.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The earliest Jaw Harps found by archaeologists.

Archaeological finds form 6 clusters: Mongolia->China, Mongolia->Baikal, Baikal->Ural/Volga, Volga->Ukraine, Manchuria->Japan, and Western Europe. Bamboo/bone JHs comprise two of the oldest clusters. Ural/Volga and Manchuria/Japan combine both organic and metallic JHs. European JHs are exclusively metallic. This clustering is exceedingly important, because metallic and organic JHs significantly differ in spectral texture.

Spectral Texture and its Dependence on Technological Evolution

The concept of musical texture (Skrebkova-Filatova, 1985) has not been applied to JH music. However, JH players definitely arrange spectral components in a way similar to parts in polyphonic music. Polyphonic thinking is common in a great many indigenous music cultures (Jordania, 2006), timbral music included. Tuvan vocal “solo-polyphony” is well-known. JH traditions also engage 2- and even 3-part polyphony (Brodsky, 1972). Dobzhanskaya (1991) pioneered the polyphonic notation62 of JH field recordings; an earlier attempt had been made by Pugh-Kitingan (1977) for a Huli JH excerpt. Polyphonic analysis must be used to investigate JH textural typology. It is hardly possible to comparatively study JH traditions without accounting for the distribution of thematic material within the spectral texture.

The JH's texture (i.e., the structure of the harmonic residue and harmonic base) depends on the instrument's material (Figure 6, see the archive “23 figures for Appendix,” in Supplementary Material, for higher resolution images).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Spectral textures of music performed on JHs made of 5 different materials. On the left, spectrograms show the spectra of JHs made of each of the 5 different materials, most commonly used in Northeastern Eurasia by indigenous players. The horizontal axis indicates time, the vertical axis frequency, and the color-coding amplitude (from black for silence to bright yellow for maximal intensity). In most cases, the texture spreads from about 70 Hz up to 3–5 kHz. On the right, the entire texture is broken in “parts” (bands), each capturing the frequency range within which the “active” harmonics form a continuous (as much as possible) melodic stream. The procedure for defining these parts is described in the Appendix in Supplementary Material. Arrows point to the original position of parts. To the right of the parts are their names, following the standard nomenclature of Western choral music. Each part's bandwidth, amplitude and number of pitch classes (i.e., pitch set) are listed on the right. A pitch class is defined by a dynamic spike repeatedly marking the same frequency level (plus/minus a quartertone) throughout the clip. The dBu value reflects the greatest amplitude for a given part of the texture within the entire clip. The red color marks the most intense part that presumably serves as the principal melodic line for the JH player. Whenever there are a few parts with many pitch classes that reach amplitudes that are close together, they are considered “polyphonic” melodies. The green color marks the “melodic” parts. Each of the complete textures and their constituent parts can be auditioned by downloading the corresponding audio file from the provided web link or looked up in the zip archive in the Supplement. For the description of Audio Examples Nos. 31-55, see the file “List of Audio Examples.docx” in the Supplements. (A) Grass JH (Nivkh). 5 Components, each melodic (including the bass). Each part uses similar number of pitches. The leading melody is in tenor. The other 4 melodies are of similar intensity, except the highest one. This texture can be called scattered “quintuplum” polyphony, since all of its parts are constantly moving in a similar way, making it hard to track their changes by ear. The only controlled part here is likely to be the tenor. (B) Bamboo JH (Ainu). 4 Components, of which the upper 2 are melodic. Bass sustains a pedal tone. Tenor is restricted to an ongoing figuration of 2 adjacent pitches (“principal” belonging to the harmonic series, and “auxiliary” that does not belong to the harmonic series but is a step away from the “principal” pitch). All parts are nearly equal dynamically. Soprano contains the most embellished hemitonic melody which uses twice more pitches than does the anhemitonic alto. This is a well-differentiated “duplum” polyphony of soprano and alto, with the drone accompaniment of tenor and bass. (C) Wooden JH (Itelmen). 5 Components, of which 3 middle ones are melodic. Bass sustains a pedal tone. Descant alternates between a few ostinato cluster-chords (one principal, others auxiliary). Three lowest parts are nearly equally intense. The polyphonic contrast is tonal (4 anhemitonic pitches for tenor vs. 14 chromatic pitches for alto). This is a fairly differentiated “triplum” polyphony of tenor, alto and soprano, accompanied by the pedal bass and pedal-like descant. (D) Bone JH (Mansi). 4 Components, of which the upper 3 are melodic. Dynamically, their relation resembles (C), but the stronger tenor is likely to lead. However, tonally, there is little differentiation between 3 melodic parts. This is a poorly differentiated “triplum” polyphony, accompanied by the bass pedal. (E) Bronze JH (Magyar). 3 Components with a single melody in tenor. Tenor is the most dynamically and melodically salient part. Its melody is accompanied by the pedal bass and the ostinato “cluster-chords” in alto. This is a well-differentiated homophony. Black horizontal lines break 5 textures in 3 groups based on their structural similarity. (A) Stands out by its maximal polyphony and the absence of differentiation of parts. (E) Stands out by its absent polyphony and maximal differentiation of parts (pedal-melody-ostinato). (B–D) Have limited selective polyphony. Of the three, (B) features the strongest, whereas (D)—the weakest differentiation. (C) Features the greatest complexity. The complete spectrograms were calibrated to blur the display of the most intense parts of the spectrum in order to better indicate the melodic continuity across pauses, along the timeline. Blurring was achieved by maximizing the FFT size up to 65,536 samples, with the multiresolution STFT, no frequency overlap and time overlap 4x-16x, depending on the audio material. The window is Gauss 200 dB. Frequency is displayed in mels. The spectrogram of a complete texture zooms in from about 0–100 Hz to 4,000–9,000 Hz, depending on the audio material. Each clip was noise-reduced and dynamically normalized. The clips of textural “parts” have slightly increased frequency zoom and reduced blurriness (greater frequency and time overlap) to display finer detail. The audio of “parts,” uploaded for audition, is normalized in order to make the parts comparable.

Grass and metallic bow-shaped JHs form two poles of textural arrangement. A grass JH generates maximal polyphony: five undifferentiated melodic parts moving simultaneously and only partially controlled63. A metallic JH generates homophony: a single melody with accompaniment. Bamboo/wood/bone engage well-differentiated polyphony: bi-melodic for bamboo and tri-melodic for bone and wood (see Appendix in Supplementary Material).

The order of the increasing discretization of parts in these textures corresponds to the order of the growing complexity of manufacturing a JH from a given material (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The correspondences between the complexity of manufacturing JHs, JH's spectral texture, and JH's sound qualities.

Materials fall into three classes according to texture, timbre, and playing technique (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Classification of JHs based on similarities and differences in sound quality, spectral texture types and playing techniques between the JHs made of different materials.

This order suggests the development toward simpler/clearer typologies where each textural type constitutes a stage that builds on a previous stage.

Obviously, the “metallic stage” comes after the “organic.” Based on a comparative ethnomusicological perspective, Sheikin (2002, p. 132) offers further distinctions. He defines the “bamboo stage”64 as representative of Oceanic cultures (exemplified in mukkuri) and preceding the “bone/wood stage” of Siberian peoples. Sheikin's periodization can be enhanced. Wooden JHs likely replaced bamboo as the JH spread north. Bone must have replaced wood in the further expansion to the tundra, where wood is rare. Hence the “bone stage” is likely to have succeeded the “wood stage.”

Geometry/construction was another factor that determined the rise of homophony: only the bow-shaped metallic JHs are homophonic. Nevertheless, both factors nearly always65 coincide (Fox, 1994; Sheikin, 2002; Kolltveit, 2016). In contrast, frame-shaped idioglot JHs do not seem to support homophony in indigenous traditions. Therefore, the adoption of bow-shaped metallic JHs ended up replacing JH polyphony with homophony.

It is imperative to determine the timeline of the distribution of bow-shaped instruments (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. World distribution of JH made of organic and metallic materials prior to the Industrial Period. This map combines archaeological and ethnographic data on local production and consumption of JH across the world, excluding mass international trade from Europe, in order to establish the routes of the spread of metallic and non-metallic JH indigenous traditions. Yellow color marks those countries where JHs were produced and widely consumed by local population. Such countries were selected based on the integration of findings of linguistic research on the presence of native words for JH in local languages (Fox, 1994; Sheikin, 2002, p. 411–503; Bakx and Crane, 2017), of archaeological finds (de Ramón and Rivera, 1982; Beck et al., 1983; Barr, 1994; Kungurov, 1994; Yakovlev, 2001; Pignocchi, 2002, 2004; Crane, 2007; Wright and Impey, 2007; Wright, 2011; Honeychurch, 2015, p. 20; Whitridge, 2015) [plus references from Table 1], and of geo-ethnographic research (Vertkov et al., 1963; Galaiskaya, 1973; Fox, 1988, 1994; Sheikin, 2002; Wright, 2004; Yesipova et al., 2008; Suzukei, 2010; Mamcheva, 2012). Geo-ethnographic data was also used to distinguish between the areas of distribution of bow-shaped metallic and frame-shaped organic JHs. Five icons with corresponding pictures mark the geographic locations of musical cultures that use JHs made of different materials. Red numbers indicate the zones of distribution for different types of JHs—encircled in different colors. (Number 1) Marks the blue oval that shows the area where organic-made JHs have been prevalent (see Figure 4). This area most likely constitutes the cradle of JH music. (Number 2) Marks the green ovals that encircle the areas where metallic JHs have coexisted with organic ones. It is in these areas, that presumably, the transition from organic to metallic instruments took place. Two areas [(2a) and (2b)] correspond to the oldest centers of metallurgy (see Figure 8). The transition probably occurred first in 2a), where the access for import of organic JHs from zone (1) was geographically broader and easier than in (2b), and organic JHs were likely to have been established prior to the wide spread of metallic artifacts. Transition in (2c) area most likely occurred much later because of the later arrival of metallurgy (see Figure 8). (Number 3) Marks the brown oval that encircles the area where exclusively metallic JHs were cultivated. The color-coded arrows show the probable direction for spreading of the organic and metallic JH technologies. Green arrows indicate the distribution of the initial handicraft metallic JHs that might have emulated popular wooden/bone/bamboo types. Brown arrows indicate the distribution of the mass-produced bow-shaped metallic construction, prevalent in Europe. Across the ocean, these arrows connect the European dominions with their offshore colonies. Over the land, brown arrows indicate the chain of cultural contacts that led to the establishment of local production centers of metallic JHs. Evidently, one of the routes of this spread went contrary to the original spread of the organic JHs—from European West to Far East, over the Steppe Belt's borderline with the northern forests via the chain of neighboring Turkic cultures that all favor metallic JHs. This route earned the nickname of “Fur Route” (Rubinson, 1992; Bunker, 1993). Another route went from Central Asia to China via the Silk Road—historic as well as prehistoric, as recent research suggested (Christian, 2000; Kuzmina, 2008; Barinova, 2013).

Organic JHs emerged in Atlai/Baikal/Mongolia/Primorye during the pre-Metal Age and spread north, south, and west. Grass and chip probably succeeded twig, followed by chip-in-frame and frame-idioglottic instruments—corresponding to the advance from purely “sonoric” effects to the pitch-oriented manipulation of overtones (Sheikin, 2002, p. 124). An example of an intermediate “chip-in-frame” construction is the Tuvan charty-komus (Suzukei, 1989, p. 65–6).

In the Volga/Kama/Ural region the westward expansion of frame met a wave of eastward expansion of metallurgy to introduce metallic JHs (Aleksandrova, 2017). Initially, these seem to have imitated the popular organic constructions (Golubkova and Ivanov, 1997). By the Sarmatians' time, a single standard for frame-shaped instruments (10.3–12.5 × 1.4–1.7 × 0.1–0.2 cm) was established across Central Asia and southern Siberia (Borodovskii, 2017). This must have corresponded to a single standard of polyphonic texture.

Farther westward propagation of JHs involved only metallic instruments; wood/bone JHs were used in Europe exceedingly rarely and only before the heteroglot metallic constructions became established (Kolltveit, 2006, p. 83)66. The bow-shaped construction was invented somewhere in Ukraine/Balkans/Alps/Karelia, providing a new, simplified texture that co-existed with the older textural standard. However, the exclusive cultivation of bow-shaped JHs must have established a new textural standard that spread all over Europe and its overseas colonies67. On land, bow-shaped JHs spread eastward over the same territories where organic JHs had already settled, eventually reaching the Far East68. This brought about the co-existence of two autonomous traditions among Nivkhi, Ainu, Evenks, Evens, Kets, Yughs, Selkups, Chukchi, Itelmens, Koryaks, Kereks, Yukagirs, Khanty, Mansi, Tuvans, Yakuts, Dolgans (Sheikin, 2002, p. 125–6), Mongols (Pegg, 2001), and Chinese (Li, 1956). The two traditions differ in playing techniques, sound quality, and texture, to the extent of bearing different names among the same people (Li, 1956; Yakovlev, 2001; Sheikin, 2002; Mamcheva, 2012). The closer to the Far East, the greater the discrepancies. This geographic distinction is supported by the gender/age distinction. Frame-shaped JHs constitute the female/children's sphere of use—bow-shaped the male/adults' (Tadagawa, 2001; Sheikin, 2002; Dyakonova, 2017)69.

Significantly, the traditions differ in their mythological status. For Yenisei peoples frame-shaped JHs represent the “voice” of a local deity in charge of successful hunting (126), whereas metallic bow-shaped JHs are an attribute of power and prestige, entitling the owner to protection (131). The ideological divide also involves an aesthetic aspect. Across the entire southeastern end of Russia, all cultures that contain both frame-shaped and bow-shaped JHs consider the former suitable for learning the JH, but not for “serious” music-making (Sheikin, 2002, p. 131)70.

Hence, each model follows its own course. Around Kama, bow-shaped JHs supplanted frame-shaped JHs (Yakovlev, 2001). Generally, the archaic polytheistic belief in sacred places yielded to a monotheistic cosmology under the influence of Christianity after Russian colonization (Alekseyev, 1992, p. 215). This weakened the kin-tree/kin-bone correspondences that provided ideological support to the frame-shaped tradition. The strengthening of top-deity cults, the Christian-like dichotomy of good/evil, and divine protection supported the “ownership-based” (not kin-based) protection of bow-shaped JHs.

The autonomy of frame- and bow-shaped traditions is corroborated by the late arrival of metallurgy to the north Pacific coast (Figure 8). The Chinese ideograph for the metallic JH (tieyehuang) confirms that the bamboo JH (huang) preceded it (Tadagawa, 1991).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Historic spread of copper metallurgy in Eurasia. This map displays the locations of earliest regional centers of smelting copper ores—according to the available archaeological research on the earliest metallurgy (Chernykh, 1966, 1992, 2012; Sunchugashev, 1975; Zhuravlev, 1977; Sergeyeva, 1981; Prakash and Tripathi, 1986; Rybakov, 1987; Kon'kova, 1989; Thiel, 1989; Mishra, 1994; Reedy, 1997; Kiriushin, 2002; Tylecote, 2002; Nguyen, 1986; Baipakov and Taimagambetov, 2006; Simukhin, 2006; Yanin, 2006; Ciarla, 2007; Hauptmann, 2007; Kaniuth, 2007; Park and Gordon, 2007; Subbotina, 2008; Herva et al., 2009; Roberts et al., 2009; White and Hamilton, 2009; Radivojević et al., 2010; Erb-Satullo, 2011; Higham et al., 2011; Wan, 2011; Potts, 2012; O'Brien, 2014; Garner, 2015; Gelegdorj, 2015; Mei et al., 2015; Hung and Chao, 2016; Huo, 2016; Tripathi, 2018). The routes and timeline of its spread suggests the spread of metallic JHs along with the new homophonic tradition of JH music. The timeline is indicated by color-coding of the circle-icons that mark the location of smelting sites: the darker—the older. The epicenter of metallurgy is in modern Turkey and Iraq, although a concurrent independent center might have existed in Vinca culture, in Balkans, Belovode (Radivojević et al., 2010). Anther independent center emerged in Fennoscandia (Herva et al., 2009) and the neighboring Karelia (Zhuravlev, 1977). Copper metallurgy spread from Balkans to Ukraine, thereon bifurcating, with one branch heading to the northeast forest zones of Russia (up to Ural Mountains), while the other moving southeast through the Steppe Belt all the way to Zabaikalye and Mongolia. There, again the route bifurcated: north, going to Yakutia, and south to Primorye. The other wave from the epicenter reached Iran, branching in 3 directions: toward Indus' valleys, Himalayas, and Middle Asia, through Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan to the Uyghur territories via the route that later became known as the Silk Road (Kuzmina, 2008). Around Lop Nor this branch met the outshoot of the Steppe Belt route and proceeded through modern China to its North and South kingdoms. The southern branch eventually hit Indochina, then heading to Indonesia and Pacific islands. This entire area, Manchuria and Japan were the last to develop metallurgy—no earlier than in Middle Ages. Therefore, if for Volga-Ural area frame-shaped JHs co-evolved with the metallic JHs, for cultures at the eastern end of Eurasia bow-shaped JHs came from West and formed its own special niche, different from the already established frame-shaped JH cultures. The bow-shaped tradition must have taken a long time to develop—as metallic artifacts were becoming more affordable to local population. Another zone where frame- and bow-shaped JHs form different cultural traditions is the vast area from southeastern Indochina to Papua New Guinea. The two zones where metallic bow-shaped JHs must have penetrated concurrently with organic frame-shaped JHs where both might have shared the same or similar forms of use, are Himalayas-Pamir-Tian-Shan mountains and Yunnan-Myanmar area.

The scenario in which the bow shape was the descendant of the frame shape also received organological support (Sachs, 1917; Dournon-Taurelle, 1975; Sheikin, 2002; Suzukei, 2010). Organological analysis of European archaeological finds indicates that European bow-shaped JHs form their own lineage of morphological development from earlier Asiatic samples brought to Europe through trade (Kolltveit, 2006). Currently, the archaeological consensus holds the organic JHs as the prototype for the metallic via westward expansion from northeast Asia (Fox, 1988; Wright, 2004; Kolltveit, 2006; Honeychurch, 2015; Aleksandrova, 2017; Turbat, 2017; Oleszczak et al., 2018). Another expansion is likely to have followed from South China to Austronesia (Blench, 2004).

The time frame for the genesis of organic JHs can be established by dating the migration of the Siberian population to America. Many North Amerindians use the PS (Ojamaa, 2002).

Example-56

The topahti—a personal Nootka song of inherited origin, performed by Joe Titian. This topahti was given at the inter-tribal marriage between Nootka and Kwakiutl as a dowry, and permitted for performance only by its owner and her children (Halpern, 1974) (http://chirb.it/NvahDq).

But no JH usage is known before the Western colonization (Wright, 2011)71. This is hard to reconcile with the evidence for the common genetic ancestry of Native Americans and south Altaians 23000–18000 BCE (Schurr, 2015). How could an instrument so important for Siberian peoples be totally missing from their American descendants? The Altai-Sayan region is home to the JH. According to genetic and linguistic evidence, Yakuts, whose national symbol is the khomus, descend from there (Pakendorf, 2007). Siberia and Alaska remained connected until 8000 BCE, but glaciers blocked Alaska from the rest of the continent until 11000 BCE (Dixon, 2015). Sequencing mitochondrial genomes from pre-Columbian South American skeletons 8,600–500 BP indicates that a small population entered the Americas through a costal route 16,000 BP (Reich et al., 2016). This date comes close to the earliest archaeological evidence of a human presence on the North American continent: 13,000 BP (Anderson and Bissett, 2015).

The most plausible scenario is that the JH tradition did not exist along the northeast Asian coast before 10,000 BP, when access to America was open. Throughout the Quaternary Northeastern Asia enjoyed a remarkably stable climate, and lowlands remained ice-free (Zamoruyev, 2004). The prevailing landscape of the non-glaciated area of Altai was desert-steppe, covered with grass, with patches of woody vegetation at stream valleys—changing into coniferous forest or forest-steppe only in the Holocene (Hais et al., 2015). Similar vegetation covered Mongolia and Tuva. Modern forest-steppe regions, e.g., Ob'-Irtysh Baraba, remained steppe throughout the early Holocene until 5500 BP (Zhilich et al., 2017). In highlands such as the Chuya Alps, the first forestation is dated 7000 BP (Agatova et al., 2012). Forestless landscape stretched toward North America, including Beringia (Hoffecker and Elias, 2007). The tundra belt extended to 57°N, then turned into steppe that covered most of Eurasia (Tarasov et al., 2000). Forestation was prominent only much farther south, at Taiwan's latitude, during the late Pleniglacial (Hope et al., 2004)—too distant from Beringia.

The scarcity of trees would have prevented the formation of the “person/kin/ethnos=tree/species/forest paradigm” that underlies the Siberian timbral music culture. The emergence of “sacred” tree cults depends on trees' importance in sustaining a human population, which requires that they be available in abundance. Otherwise, plants' proprietary “voices” cannot be discovered by population groups large enough to institute a musical tradition.

Conclusion

Not all known music systems abide by the principle of discrete changes in pitch. In fact, many music cultures rely on timbral changes in their TO. One trait such cultures share is the prevalence of the “personal” over the “collective” use of music, upholding the opposition between “timbre-centered” (definite timbre/indefinite pitch) and “frequency-centered” (definite pitch/indefinite timbre) music systems. Current psychoacoustic research seems to support this opposition.

The large concentration of “timbral” cultures in the former USSR prompted research (often emic72) on their TO, promoted by the centralized infrastructure of research institutions, “top-down” funding (official ideology favored “people's music”), and the intense development of ear-training research. The accumulation of vast ethnographic and archaeological data over much of the twentieth century made it possible to create a “historic” perspective on the evolution of folk music. The integration of sciences within Soviet academe supported a multi-disciplinary approach that combined fieldwork with experimental testing. The gathered evidence suggests that “frequency-” and “timbre-centered” musics contrast each other in their TO, patterns of usage, and their social implementation.

Timbral TO relies on PS in vocal, and JH musicking in instrumental domains. Every member of such traditional society possesses at least one PS that serves for personal identification. Musical elements usually indicate family relations and birthplace through similarities with other individuals' PSs. Locals have a keen ear and memory for cross-relating thousands of PSs throughout their life (better than for remembering faces)73.

PS contributes to mental health in the traditional Siberian lifestyle. Ongoing singing throughout one's day secures consistency in self-consciousness under environmental stress, common in severe Siberian conditions, thus protecting one from psychological disorders. Pathological singing accompanies multiple personality disorder (meneryia) and sleep-singing disorder (tyyl yryata), most probably related to the dysfunction of the PS circuit.

In traditional societies, PS lowers the standard of musicality to maximize singing accessibility. Close relatives sing their PS for aphoniacs. An indefinite intervallic structure and an absence of the notion of “wrong notes” make a PS performable by almost anyone. Playing JH is even more accessible.

The JH opposes PS by “de-personalizing” one's natural voice via the JH's vocoding mechanism. While camouflaging one's voice, the JH “impersonates” a wealth of environmental sounds. Its exceptional mimicry allows for re-creating the “real world” musically through the timbral abstraction of sounds and their arrangement according to principles of phonetic symbolism.

The JH addresses the objective aspects of reality, PS the subjective. Together, they form a coherent musical worldview, which explains why numerous North Asiatic ethnicities have so few “pitched” musical instruments: They simply did not have much need for them.

Indefinite-in-pitch rhythmo-timbral “themes” effectively represent:

• for PS—one's daily chores (“person”=monotheme, “chores”=variables in PS's variations);

• for JH—one's environment (“person”=low drone, “environment”=mid/high spectrum).

Both rest on the traditional hierarchic paradigm: “person”-“kin”-“ethnos”=“tree”-“tree-species”-“forest.” Such a paradigm must have formed in southeastern Siberia/Manchuria ≈10,000 BP. JHs made of ancestral plants were initially used as talismans. The accumulation of onomatopoeic devices and conventions of phonetic symbolism created “timbral words,” “timbral phrases,” instrumental patterns emulating PSs, and, eventually, proprietary JH TO, where the key role belongs to a set of “harmonic templates.” Each template carries a specific semantic value, enabling linguistic-like semiosis: meaningful elements comprise meaningful components, but convey emotional rather than referential information. This development must have directed the entire evolution of Eastern Eurasian timbre-based music systems in opposition to the frequency-based music of the Eurasian West74. The JH was for the prehistoric East what the bone pipe was for the prehistoric West.

The personal nature of PS/JH traditions stems from their reliance on timbre, which is fundamentally unsuitable for collective musicking. Collective performance of PSs or JHs would make their message unrecognizable. Only frequency-based music allows the tradition of collective performance to form and continue.

Western frequency tradition, exemplified by Aurignacian pipes (Morley, 2013), might have African roots. Africa underwent two major demographic expansions prior to the Aurignacian, enabled by its tropical ecology (Lahr and Foley, 2001). The second expansion (86,000–61,000 BP) carried haplogroup L3 outside of Africa (Atkinson et al., 2009). Genetic evidence suggests that non-Africans descend primarily from this migration, whose maximum falls on 70,000 BP, coinciding with the improved climate in East/Central Africa (Soares et al., 2012). At that time, the East African effective population size was at least 10,000 people (Relethford, 1998), vs. the census maximum of 3,700 in Gravettian Europe75.

Tropical environments generally support greater population densities than those at higher latitudes (Layton and O'Hara, 2012). Environmental conditions impact demographic density the most, and even the tropical desert supports a denser population than the polar biome (Tallavaara et al., 2018). Intergroup connectedness also drops at higher latitudes; the large effective population of connected groups in the African Middle Stone Age contrasts with stochastic variation without linear trajectories in the contemporaneous European Mediterranean region (Malinsky-Buller and Hovers, 2019). Sparse groups' migration leads to frequent losses of gained cultural skills. Steady post-Gravettian demographic growth triggered the cumulative cultural complexity that characterizes behavioral modernity (Shennan, 2001). Part of this was the consistent increase of foragers' group size (Grove, 2012). By 45,000 BP, the median effective population size in Europe equaled that which sub-Saharan Africa had reached 101,000 BP—alongside the markers of modern behavior (Powell et al., 2009).

Population growth promotes group cohesion, territoriality, ethnogenesis, and language formation (Robb, 1993). “Frequency music” likely followed suit. Steady demographic growth accompanied the Neolithic “revolution” and civilizations' rise (Hassan, 1981)—together with “frequency-based” music (Nikolsky, 2016). Collective music-making was part of the “demographic expansion package” designed to consolidate and empower the “tribe” to grab and hold its territory.

Radically different is the demography of northeastern Eurasia. Siberia is famous for its immense land (13,100,000 km2), sparse population (200,000 before Russian colonization), and the so-called everlasting importance of hunting/gathering for sustenance (Naumov, 2006). Such population density−0.065 person/km2–approximates the 0.036 person/km2 maximum of Magdalenian Europe (Maier, 2017). Harsh living in the traditional lifestyle makes landholding not a viable strategy. Constant migration by small “packs” requires marking and regulating the sharing of territory between all neighbors, helping each other to survive (Funk, 2006). Therefore, local beliefs assign power not to the “tribe” but to the spirit-masters of landmarks on whose disposition human “tenants” must rely. This has laid the foundation for the PS/JH pan-Siberian framework. And since the climate in Northeastern Asia remained remarkably stable throughout the Quaternary (Zamoruyev, 2004), it is reasonable to believe that the institution of PS/JH characterizes the music culture of local prehistoric people.

It can hardly be a coincidence that the area where JH remains to be the principal musical instrument in scarce instrumentarium is identical with the area of the greatest concentration of Denisovan genomes. The highest levels of Denisovan ancestry is found in Oceanic populations (Vernot et al., 2016). Denisovan genomes are also present in Eastern Eurasians and Native Americans (Qin and Stoneking, 2015). Denisovans may have interbred with early humans over the territory of Northern China (Martinón-Torres et al., 2017), where the oldest JHs were unearthed. Longevity of the JH dominance might constitute a distant remnant of the Denisovan timbral music tradition, preserved in the refugium of isolated Pacific islands, north-Chinese deserts and Altai mountains. Neanderthal heritage could entail the “frequency music,” carried from Africa by Homo Heidelbergensis. The latter adapted to the northern latitudes as opposed to southern Homo erectus—and so is the case with Neanderthals as opposed to Homo Heidelbergensis (Grove et al., 2012). Either of them might have adapted the southern collective “frequency music” to the northern ecosystems, generating a new76 personal “timbral music.”

The sparse Neanderthal (French, 2016) and Denisovan (Meyer et al., 2012) populations of the Pleistocene Altai (Buzhilova et al., 2017) might have also subscribed to “timbral music”. Homo's “timbral music” either descended from Neanderthals and Denisovans, or “downgraded” from the European “frequency music” carried by “Ancient North Siberians” from the West ≈38,000 BP (Sikora et al., 2019).

Author Contributions

EA and AN conceived the presented idea. VD organized the recording of Jaw Harps at the Jaw Harp Museum in Yakutsk, collected all the necessary ethnographic materials and provided the most recent data of the fieldwork research in Siberia and Russian Far East. She verified the information on traditional musical instruments in Siberia. IA performed on different Jaw Harps and had them recorded and acted as a consultant in relation to the indigenous Siberian traditional music and matters of prosody and phonology of Jaw Harp playing and singing. EA provided his archive of the recordings and supervised the application of his methodology of the analysis of tonal organization of indigenous folk music. AN conducted the acoustic and musicological analysis of the provided material, conceived the method of analysis of spectral textures, corroborated all the findings with the research in the former USSR, modern Russia, and Western countries, wrote the manuscript and created the figures and tables for it. EA edited the manuscript. AN translated it into English.

Conflict of Interest

AN was employed by company, Braavo Enterprises.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Valentina Suzukei, Natalia Mamcheva, Oksana Dobzhanskaya, Yurii Sheikin, Tatyana Ignatyeva, Gjermund Kolltveit, Erkin Alekseyev, Ricardo Eichmann, Leon Crickmore, Jeremy Montagu, Triinu Ojamaa, Jaan Ross, Iraida Seliutina, Nikolai Urtegeshev, Tatiana Ryzhykova, Albina Dobrinina, Tatiana Daineko, Josef Jordania, Alexandra Khaltanova, Yevdokiya Sergina, Spiridon Shishigin, Alevtina Everstova, and Vyatcheslav Shchurov for providing us with the necessary materials for this project. We appreciate the thorough critical input from Theodor Levin that was instrumental for shaping the scope of our research. Special thanks to Erkin Alekseyev, Nastya Petrova, and Aksenty Beskrovny for their recordings of Jaw Harp, and to Sheila Bazleh for editing the text of this manuscript. Also we would like to thank Brian C. J. Moore, Viktor Reznik, Stephen McAdams, Pantelis N. Vassilakis, Steven Brown, Jaan Ross, and Frank Scherbaum for their help in elaborating the optimal approach to taking acoustic measurements of Jaw Harp recordings and interpreting their results.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03051/full#supplementary-material

Data Sheet 1. Appendix. Spectral texture.

Data Sheet 2. List of audio examples.

Data Sheet 3. Textural typology for Appendix.

Presentation 1. Audio for the article.

Presentation 2. Audio for Appendix.

Presentation 3. Figures for Appendix.

Abbreviations

PS, personal song; JH, jaw harp; AH, arctic hysteria; TO, tonal organization; FF, fundamental frequency; f1, first harmonic; F1, first formant; dBFS, decibels relative to full scale; BP, before present.

Footnotes

1. ^The emphasis in both quotations is added to the original.

2. ^In case if the internet links provided for the audio examples end up being broken, the archive with all of the audio examples (named “Audio for the article”) is available in the Supplementary Material.

3. ^Recently, considerable material has emerged, which well fits Teplov's theory. Timbre and pitch perception seem to engage the same brain resources, and therefore require selective attention (Melara and Marks, 1990a). Analytic extraction of pitch affects extraction of timbre properties, and vice versa (Melara and Marks, 1990b). Timbre affects judgements of simple pitch discrimination (Singh and Hirsh, 1992). Melodic motion can be compromised by timbral shift so that non-musicians could perceive a melodic tritone as larger in size than a perfect 5th (Russo and Thompson, 2005). Timbre can interfere with perception of melodic direction (Allen and Oxenham, 2014). Mistakes in melodic direction due to changes in timbre and loudness are especially pronounced in children as opposed to adults (Williams, 1990).

4. ^The detrimental influence of usage of Western frequency-based music on timbral perception has been experimentally demonstrated in a number of studies. A tonal reference can reduce timbre's interference with pitch extraction (Warrier and Zatorre, 2002). This interference is much greater for Western non-musicians (less experienced in pitch analysis) than for musically trained listeners (Pitt, 1994). On the other hand, simplification and uniformity of spectral content seems to enhance frequency-interval discrimination in Western music (Zarate et al., 2013).

5. ^Recently, this claim was substantiated by the evidence for two alternative pitch encoding mechanisms based on frequency resolution or non-resolution of harmonics of the fundamental tone (Grimault et al., 2002). This difference seems to lie at the heart of the distinction between “timbre-centered” and “frequency-centered” listening modes.

6. ^Leontyev borrowed the concept of “functional organ” from Aleksey Ukhtomsky (1978) who held that “organ” did not necessarily have to constitute a morphologically distinct anatomical part, but may have constituted an organization of a specific function with dynamic rather than static attributes.

7. ^Some support for Leontyev's and Zaporozhets' conclusion of post-natal formation of pitch discrimination skills comes from more recent Western research. Thus, McAdams and Bertoncini (1997) found that at birth infants can discriminate between rising and falling melodic contours only when they are presented with timbrally and spatially contiguous sounds. Schwarzer (1997) found that 5–7 year old children generally favor tracking loudness and timbre in analytic listening tasks over tracking melodic contour—unlike adult listeners.

8. ^At present, cross-cultural investigation of general patterns of acquisition of music skills is in its virginal state. Only a handful of publications in English discuss the issue of musical development in non-Western societies (Blacking, 1967; Garfias, 1990; Fernald, 1992; Papoušek, 1996; Minks, 2002; Stige, 2002; Nettl, 2005).

9. ^This generalization applies only to the indigenous folk traditions of timbre-based music – and not to the styles of Western classical music that are based on sonoristic effects rather than conventional “melodies” or “chords,” such as “sonorism” (e.g., Krzysztof Penderecki) or “spectralism” (e.g., Tristan Murail). Such styles generally tend to follow an “experimental” approach forged by Western modernistic composers through “inventing” their own original means of tonal organization rather than implementing already existing folk timbre-based music systems that have been “naturally” formed over a long period of time within an indigenous cultural tradition.

10. ^The term “phono-instrument” was introduced by Sheikin (1996) to supplement the Sachs/Hornbostel structural classification of musical instruments by the classification of functionality of their use, where “phono-instruments” represent the archaic forms of musicking—preceding the invention of instruments designed specifically to generate a particular type of music (Sheikin, 2002).

11. ^This lamellophone musical instrument is often called “Jew's harp,” which is somewhat confusing, since it is neither connected to Jews, nor to Judaism (Wright, 2015, XIV). A more appropriate name seems to be “jaw harp” (Crane, 1982), as suggested earlier by Sachs (1940, p. 58)—for the characteristic manner of its sound production. Player plucks the lamella while holding the instrument close to his/her mouth, used as a resonance chamber for amplifying the desired partials of the vibrating lamella (Ledang, 1972; Adkins, 1974; Trias, 2010).

12. ^During the second half of the twentieth century, a number of blacksmith masters in the USSR, especially Yakutia, attempted to enhance the construction of JH by maximizing the instrument's dynamic capacities to make JH more suitable for concert stage performance (Dyakonova, 2011). Modernized instruments substantially differ from traditional ones—to such extent that some experts consider them “not simply an augmented khomus, but a new instrument in terms of acoustics and art” (Kunanbayeva, 1987).

13. ^Personal communication with N. Mamcheva.

14. ^The notable exception are those cases where making of an instrument has to pass through a specific magic ritual, such as divination of the tambourine for shamanic use, which might involve up to 9 specialists and take a few days.

15. ^For instance, the choice of ysyakh (the summer solstice celebration) as a subject by a khomus-player usually involves performance of the okhuokhai rhythmo-formula (festive round dance), the crescendo effect (as if gradually approaching the festival), kuoregei (imitation of a larch-call, associated with sunrise), kebe (cuckoo call, announcing the onset of summer), tabygyr (associated with the sound of the horse trot and droplets of melting icicles), and uyuu (articulation of words representing shouting of excited people and singing of dance-leaders) (Shishigin, 1995; Alekseev, 1988).

16. ^Syyia in Yakut literally means “slowly, staidly,” and tardy—“to yank, pull,” as to pluck the JH's lamella. Syyia tardy signifies a particular playing technique, where silent mouth articulations as though speak out syllables while the plucked lamella keeps vibrating. Its technique is also used in other styles that require increased clarity of articulation (Zhirkova, 1991). This underlines the priority of clear diction, precluding simultaneous engagement of many JHs.

17. ^“Khomus” (“Khamys” in archaic spelling) is a Yakut Jaw Harp. The alternative meaning of this word is “Scirpus”—grass-like plant that grows next to rivers and lakes (Pekarsky, 1959, p. 3293). Most probably, the original instrument was manufactured of this grass—similar to the way modern Nivkhi and Ulchi make their grass JHs (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 50).

18. ^JH duets occur either during dating or in joined entertainment between two female friends. Thus, in Bashkortostan, leisure sessions might engage up to 3 women playing together (Shchurov, 1995).

19. ^One of the first accounts of such practice comes from the time of collectivization campaigns in Middle Asia after the establishment of the Communist rule. Vinogradov (1938, p. 88) describes the performance of a JH orchestra of Kyrghyz young women as a “haphazard juxtaposition” of multiple instruments “without any coordination,” where each performer played according to their own whims.

20. ^The brightest features that distinguish this new use of JH from the autochthonous traditions of the past are its presentation from concert stage for a large audience, use of microphones and continuous concurrent playing of more than two instruments. Noteworthy is the globalization tendency of this new format—it attracts artists from many diverse ethnical backgrounds, including those that have not retained their autochthonous JH traditions (e.g., Russians).

21. ^The empowering effect of collective frequency-centered performance is most evident in such genres as the work-song, military music and the national anthem—all called forth to increase group cohesion and to strengthen each of the participants.

22. ^The propensity for self-communication – uniting self-reflection while performing, to the memory of oneself perceiving the same lyrical expression at some earlier time(s), was identified by Yury Lotman in regard to poetry (Lotman, 2001, p. 25). Musical expression can also follow suit. In fact, this is exceedingly common in traditional cultures of almost all indigenous people of Siberia (Sheikin, 2002, p. 304).

23. ^This term originates from writings by Merriam (1964, p. 83). In English language literature, the term has been used in reference to “private songs” of North American Indians, e.g., Sioux (Austin, 1930), who, along with Canadian indigenous population, share the institute of PS with Siberian ethnoses (Ojamaa, 2002). In Russian research literature the most common equivalent term is “lichnaya pesnia.”

24. ^The PS taboo can be illustrated by the following case: after a newly installed system in the settlement's club-house played back a PS recording of a recently deceased local old woman, the residents of Chukchi settlement in dismay demanded that its public broadcasting be stopped immediately (Novik, 1999).

25. ^One often imitates a relative's PS when moving away from home, due to suffering from nostalgia. Reminiscing about a dear relative by singing a similar PS on a daily basis, then, serves as combating nostalgia.

26. ^In the past, for many, if not most, Siberian ethnoses, multiple personal songs were common. However, during the communist rule the institute of PS was severely shaken by campaigns directed against “shamanism,” replacement of traditional lifestyles with modern ones, and the growing influence of “metropolitan” Russian culture, empowered through the education system. Thus, traditional taboo on non-personal use of PS was undermined by public broadcasting of those popular songs that are based on “personal motifs” of their creators, such as those by the distinguished Chukchi musician, Gennadii Pananto (Vensten-Tagrina, 2008).

27. ^Russian ethnomusicologists often nickname PS a “musical passport.” Passport in USSR differed from Western passports in that it indicated one's permanent residential address (propiska)—in addition to identifying a person's face, name, and family status—very much what the PS usually indicates.

28. ^The documented evidence often indeed details the description of cases where witnesses who had observed the AH behavior shortly developed the same or very similar symptoms themselves. Sometimes these symptoms did not disappear by time, but gradually exacerbated into regular fits. This was especially common amongst females.

29. ^Thus, Yevdokiya Sergina, a professor of the Arctic State Institute of Art and Culture in Yakutsk, in a personal communication, admitted to have deliberately avoided contact with people that suffered from AH disorders in fear of their detrimental influence. To illustrate the potential dangers involved, she reported the suicide of a young researcher who specialized in shamanic mysteries, after having attempted to investigate such disorders.

30. ^The modern reduction in severity and incidence of AH could also be explained by the growing acceptance of AH by the local population, who tend to avoid medical assistance—in combination with the lack of qualified scholars capable of establishing rapport with local population to obtain confidential information. Most likely, the exuberance of the anamnesis information in nineteenth to twentieth century Russia became possible because of the custom of condemning political prisoners to settle in Siberia. Most physicians and ethnographers who left accounts of AH were convicted to exile at first by Imperial and later by Bolshevik courts—a long-lasting tradition that was instituted from the times of Russian conquest of Siberia (Hartley, 2014). The length of their sentences secured their bond with the indigenous people. Additionally, political convicts of the nineteenth century (as well as Bolshevik officials appointed to investigate local living conditions) used to be atheistic—unsusceptible to fear of evil spirits.

31. ^Menerik yryata singing that includes moaning, shouting and occasional clapping with lyrics as though coming in alternation from presumable “evil spirits” and the singer himself/herself, is still encountered not only amongst Yakuts but also their neighbors, who have their own names for such singing: cármoriel amongst Yukagirs, haujan amongst Evenki (Jochelson, 1910, p. 31).

32. ^Shimkevich describes a traditional Nanai wooden idol (seon) and an iconographic image drawn on a piece of cloth, paper or wood (girki) of a deity (burkhan) that has multiple heads, representing the disarrayed and conflicting mentality (p. 49). Nanai call such multi-headed burkhanssegemi.” A similar tradition was described in neighboring Nivkh culture (Shrenk, 1903, p. 118).

33. ^Tyyn yryata (“night songs,” in Yakut), or tyyl yryata (“sleeping songs”) is unconscious singing in sleep, often sung in foreign tongues that the singer does not speak when in an alerted state. This is still relatively common amongst Northern Siberian ethnoses, especially men. Evenks call this singing náyani, and Yukaghirs—yendójenut yáxtei (Jochelson, 1910, p. 13:37).

34. ^To illustrate this point, in 1957, one of the authors of this paper, Ivan Alekseev, irretrievably damaged his vocal cords by the excessive singing of his PS in nostalgia, after having moved away from his homeland. Nevertheless, his “bad” voice in no way affected the public judgment of his PS singing. This is in stark contrast to “bad” singing of Western classical compositions, which requires sustaining the pitch without fluctuations, retaining pleasant timbre, etc. (Sundberg, 1987).

35. ^Although these terms originate from Western musicology, they are applicable to non-Western timbre-based music too. PS users reserve certain attributes of the melody and the timbre to make PS recognizable across all modifications. This is quite similar to what classical composers do in stage works (operas, ballets) and program music (tone poems and overtures). In both cases, the retained “leit-nucleus” marks the features of the “protagonist,” whereas the changeable elements represent the “background” features, characterizing the context of action/happening.

36. ^In Russian systematic musicology, the classic definition of “musical theme” is: “Musical idea that is fixed in musical structures, characterized by considerable completeness, salience, and originality—allowing one to recognize these structures upon repeated hearing—and that are often used continuously or reused within the same musical work” (Mazel, 1979, p. 151). Structurally, “thematicism” is the “totality of all themes employed in a work or in a group of works, which characterizes a particular music style (153). “Thematic material” is the complex of musical structures employed toward making a given musical work – disregarding their completeness and salience (152).

37. ^The notion of “musical theme” is often described as peculiar to the Western classical music. This is not true. For instance, in South Indian Carnatic tradition, a musical composition is often segmented in 3 sections (Pallavi, Anupallavi, and Caranam) based on the treatment of the musical theme (Agrawal, 2018). The gamelan tradition not only utilizes the variation form, but also employs various forms of accompaniment to the principal theme (Miller and Williams, 2008).

38. ^JH players choose a specific articulation (vowel or syllable), melodic intonation (a succession of pitches), imitation of a natural sound (birdcall) or a special technical device (staccato) for their specific expression. They use it either for repetition, variation, or contrast to some other thematic element – generating a sort of expressive “scenario” for a musical piece.

39. ^Although Western listeners do integrate melodic and verbal information in lyrics prior to parsing song's lyrics, they process verbal and musical structures separately while listening to familiar songs (Sammler et al., 2010). In contrast, for indigenous Siberian listeners, autonomous processing of pitch and text does not seem to occur under any circumstances. Of course, final conclusion should be drawn only after experimental research of song's perception by representatives of well-preserved “timbral cultures,” such as the nomadic Nganasan or Evenk.

40. ^In Siberia and Russian Far East, the exceptions from strict monophony are scarce: only the practice of collective repetition of the leader's verse by the chorus of dancers in Yakut osuokhai and similar dances of the neighboring peoples (Alekseyev, 1967), and, perhaps, the singing of the shaman's sidekicks during his kamlaniye—a ritual of reaching spirits necessary to fulfill the client's need (Dobzhanskaya, 2008).

41. ^Thus, Khalkha Mongol women teach their children to play JH using imitations of horse and camel gaits. This is closely related to the herding family business in which children become involved at an early age (Pegg, 2001).

42. ^Ivan Alekseev emphasizes that this generalization relies on the same synesthetic association of “smallness” with front vowels and “largeness” with back vowels that underlies phonetic symbolism of speech. JH articulations require constant control of all the constituents of the vocal apparatus, and reconfigurations of larynx and pharynx are usually done automatically—based on the reflexes established by speech.

43. ^Other than having a peculiar timbre, each instrument is characterized by a specific pattern of sounds convenient for playing on it. Thus, mandolin is characterized by plucking tremolo, guitar by strumming chords, and cimbalom by hammering passages—each of which can be successfully imitated by other instruments (as in orchestrations of Sicilian, Spanish, or Hungarian style music). In musicological literature such characteristic patterns are usually put under the umbrella of “musical texture” (Frayonov, 1981). Most popular musical instruments have developed “glossaries” of such patterns that allow to tell a musical composition that was conceived for one instrument from another (Kholopova, 1979).

44. ^For example, maidens of the Bontoc tribe sing inside their houses in response to young men's JH playing outside, trying to guess the identity of the player (Canave-Dioquino et al., 2008, p. 437). Amongst Li people of Hainan, in contrary, girls use JH to camouflage their voices in their confession of love to young men (Hsu, 2001).

45. ^The capacity of JH to faithfully reproduce vowels and some consonants of a language is often employed to deliver words and phrases at the closest distance, so that the more remote occasional witnesses would not be able to eavesdrop on an intimate conversation. Thus, in Hmong tradition JH not only imitates linguistic phonemes, but also engages tone intonations (Poss, 2012).

46. ^The extension of traditional beliefs in JH talismanic protection can be seen in the modern-day use of JH music for therapeutic purposes by the local Siberian population. Such is the program of “Meditative-imagery Jaw Harp therapy” at the Goriachii Kliuch Sanatorium in Krasnodar administrative district, where about 60% of patients report improvement from such problems as panic attacks, posttraumatic stress, acute depression, sleep disorders and irritable bowel (Kalinichenko and Alekseyev, 2009).

47. ^Thus, Yenisei ethnicities consider JH to be the instrument of Kaigus'—a bear-like deity, master of all animals, who uses JH made of birch splinter to imitate voices of all animals and thereby exercises power to dictate to them (Sheikin, 2002, p. 126). According to myths, in order to secure prey, Kaigus' taught human hunters to play JH prior to hunting.

48. ^The word “seok” in languages of Altaians literally means “kin,” “generation,” “bone,” and has been used in reference to a specific form of societal exogamic patrilineal organization (Verbitsky, 1865). Seok's meaning of “kin” relates to its secondary meaning of “bone” through a more general meaning of “remains” (cemetery), where “bone” is understood as “the quintessence of live matter, capable of securing future births”—a trans-Siberian convention (Sagalayev and Oktiabr'skaya, 1990, p. 39). Hence, “bone” is something that is left from the deceased ancestor and that ties him/her with posterity: native Siberians believe that members of the same kin share the same bone ingredients (40).

49. ^A stranger uttering names of a person, his relatives, sacred objects of his kin, including sacred trees, is believed to potentially harm that kin. This taboo has imposed heavy restrictions on wives, who despite bearing their husbands' children, remained estranged from their husbands' kin—thus, until the XX century, an Altaic widow did not receive inheritance after her husband's death (unlike her daughter) (Yenchinov, 2009).

50. ^Video recording of M. Angin, the elder of the village Auri, Ulchi district, playing JH with the help of an axe can be seen in the documentary film “Ulchi,” made in 1967 by the Moscow Studio of Documentary Films (Duvan, 2003). This technique requires superimposition of axe's blade on the ring of a metallic JH. The same performance technique was also utilized by Nivkhs in the beginning of the twentieth century (Mamcheva, 2012, p. 54).

51. ^Yakut master Piotr Krivoshapkin from the settlement, Khomustaakh (Namskii ulus), used to manufacture the JH-axe hybrid—which was filmed by a group of Czech filmmakers in 1967.

52. ^Structurally, Even classification is based on the relation between music and words. Tiinmei (“to speak to oneself”) is an improvisatory song, created strictly for oneself, using timbral words mixed with spontaneous prosaic mundane texts. Ikaan (“song”) can be performed for others. It uses cliché fragments of poetic speech which, however, do not comprise poetic verses. Alma (“recollection”) is a “cover-song”—it reproduces someone else's words and/or musical themes and is retained as a ready-made “plot” in the memory of the following generations. Alma consists mostly of poetic speech.

53. ^Chukchi classification is based on social grouping. Chinitkin grep conveys one's personal identity (“I, who sings my song”), roiyr'yn grep reflects one's membership in the family (“We, who share a home, sing as I do), chygrymngyat grep presents the entire clan of related families (“We, who share fire, sing songs to ancestors as I do) (Sheikin, 2018, p. 257, 41). The latter type has disappeared in the mid-twentieth century.

54. ^JH personal instrumental pattern for dog-riding imitates barking with short tones articulated on syllables “khai t'ok khai-nak-nak” or “khavr-khavr khaf-khaf-khaf ,” while JH pattern for self-entertainment is based on sustained monotones on “ko lyo-lyo-lyo,” with vibrato of the lower lip or tip of the tongue.

55. ^For example, all melodies of Ude songs include words “yava-yava,” whereas Nivkh songs—“anga-anga” (Sheikin, 2002, p. 250–1). Such words differ from “regular” meaningful words by being verbally meaningless and conveying semantic information through phonic symbolism alone. Often, they require a specific rhythm and melodic contour, thereby exercising a formative influence on the melody.

56. ^Thus, in his diary from 1926 to 1927, Tchernetsov cites the meaningless sentence “Gav-ri-ke, gav-ri-ke, vas pyrish, vas pyrish!” that he heard continuously repeated on the JH (tumran) by a Northern Mansi girl in a remote Sos'va settlement.

57. ^For example, a syyia tardy can be dedicated to such subject as representation of a young man and can present an “aesthetic” contemplation on such a “topic.” JH player envisages a protagonist (here, a young man) and fantasizes a storyline, more or less cohesive and tangible, that is not always describable in words. Such a composition is “about someone else” (“objective”)—as opposed to the typical PS which is “about the singer” himself/herself (“subjective”).

58. ^We must underline that the homogeneous nature of singing manifests itself only in frequency-based musical traditions. Vocalizations of timbre-based cultures, including PS and vocal “games,” such as Inuit katajjaq or Ainu rekkukara (Nattiez, 1983), abide by principles of timbral contrast, and are considerably richer than conventional frequency-based vocal music. Such timbrally-rich vocalization styles are used by Chukchi, Nganasan, Koryak, Kerek, Even, Enets, Yukagir, Nanai, Oroch, and Ude (Sheikin, 1996). As Sheikin demonstrates in his analysis of these styles, their TO is based on the binary opposition of two “timbral classes”: inspiratory and expiratory rasping, each of which is varied by employing different syllables and intonations. There can be as many of 20 “timbral classes” (e.g., the pilche'ingen vocal system of Chukchi).

59. ^That is why multiple attempts to modernize the traditional JH constructions by adding extra lamellas or joining a few JHs on a single “JH farm” did not really catch up with majority of JH players. Western European players of multi-pitched JHs subscribe to the model of Western tonality borrowed from classical music. Chinese players follow the model of traditional Chinese music system based on yayue. Like Western tonality, this constitutes a type of tonality—frequency-based music (as opposed to timbre-based indigenous JH traditions).

60. ^This matter is thoroughly examined in the acoustic and ethnographic study that is scheduled for publication by the state People of the World Khomus Museum and Center in Yakutsk, Russia next year.

61. ^In Yakut language exclamation “urui,” especially common for shamanic verses, is used in prayers for well-being, repelling evil, expressing a jolly feeling, calling for fighting, or announcing an end to something (Pekarsky, 1959, p. 3070).

62. ^She distinguished between 4 textural layers in the repertoire of Chuvan JH music for frame-shaped JHs: (1) the FF; (2) its subharmonic chest resonance an octave below; (3) the middle melodic layer above FF controlled by the player's breathing and tongue position, exhibiting “talking” qualities; and (4) a high melodic layer that changes the sustained phonemic formants which resembles singing.

63. ^There is experimental evidence that non-musicians can simultaneously track no more than 3 concurrently running polyphonic parts, and trained musicians—up to 4 (Stoter et al., 2013). Although this was established in relation to frequency-based music, it can also apply to timbral-based music since most known traditions of vocal and instrumental timbral music too use no more than 3–4 parts. It is reasonable to expect the JH players to consistently and reliably control no more than 2–3 melodic parts. This assumption agrees with the anecdotal information from JH players.

64. ^Sheikin speaks of the “bamboo period,” but his choice of the term “period” is not the most accurate for designating the timeline of JH's evolution. The word “period” implies a “hard” end—one period replacing another. However, none of the JH materials have been really “discontinued” in the production of JH. Once mastered, a material usually remains in use. Therefore, the term “stage” seems more appropriate here, since developmental stages are cumulative in nature and built on top of one another.

65. ^In Taiwan and Indonesia there are very few examples of indigenous musical traditions that use bamboo frame-shaped JHs with metallic lamella (Kolltveit, 2016). This is also the case in Vietnam (Wright, 2001). However, judging by available recordings of such instruments, this hybrid construction does not substantially differ in spectral texture from the frame-shaped instruments that are made just out of bamboo. On the territory of Russia, bow-shaped JHs are always metallic (Sheikin, 2002, p. 129).

66. ^There are some vague ethnographical references indicating that wooden JHs have been used in Flanders, Hungary and Ireland—however, such cases seem to be exceptional, leaving no archaeological or historic traces (Kolltveit, 2009). It is likely that wooden instruments such as Slovenian drumlja present a relatively modern development, called to reduce costs and thereby increase sales of JH in modern market conditions.

67. ^Low quality of mass produced instruments is known to negatively affect the standards of JH music produced on imported JHs—as compared to hand-crafted instruments of indigenous JH traditions (Morgan, 2017). Metallic instruments, less responsive to the player's technique, must have further limited the spectral content of JH texture, increasing the dominance of a single melodic “part” even more.

68. ^Such scenario has been confirmed in relation to Yakutia where organic frame-shaped JHs were found to precede the metallic bow-shaped JHs (Dyakonova, 2017). The same applies to the peoples of Volga-Urals (Yakovlev, 2001), Kama (Golubkova and Ivanov, 1997), Sakhalin (Mamcheva, 2012).

69. ^Thus, amongst Khanty and Mansi, frame-shaped tumran is strictly female, related to wedding rituals of fortune-telling and “avoiding” men (Sheikin, 2002, p. 127). Across Southeastern Siberia bow-shaped JHs are used exclusively by men in funeral lamentations, whereas females use bowed pikolute instead (131).

70. ^An interesting case presents the tradition of Ude JH. Despite the fact that Ude hunters consider frame-shaped JHs as being children instruments, nevertheless, they report that hunters must play it after setting their hunting traps to ensure that the prey will be trapped (132). This testifies to a more ancient origin of the frame-shaped construction in hunter-gatherer's societies—in contrast to the bow-shaped construction that did not exist before the Metal Age. The same applies to their respective musical textures.

71. ^JHs, rather popular amongst modern Inuits (Nattiez, 1976), have been introduced in Alaska, Canada and Greenland from Western Europe (Whitridge, 2015). The JH-like use of the feather of an arctic bird, common eider (Somateria mollissima), was observed amongst the Inuits of the Belcher Islands and northern Quebec (Oakes, 1991). They hold the feather in their mouths and beat it with one hand. A photograph of this is published in the LP “Inuit Throat And Harp Songs” (Green and Hodge, 1980). Most likely, feather is used as a more affordable material to substitute the imported metallic JH. However, the possibility that the feather use is a local invention that might have preceded JH trade cannot be completely discarded. However, even in this case, such feather use remains totally isolated.

72. ^Thus, three of the authors of this paper were raised in the native cultural environment of Yakutia, and therefore combine a first-hand “emic” knowledge about its indigenous music (and language) with an expertise in musicological analysis of such music.

73. ^Long-term memory for melodic structures is known for remarkable longevity and capacity (Halpern and Bartlett, 2010). Accurate memorization of music can be life-long (Bartlett and Snelus, 1980). Music seems to provide superior encoding, evident in the phenomenon of earworms, unique to the domain of music (Halpern and Bartlett, 2011).

74. ^For more information on the role of flute-like instruments in determining a music system see “Tonal organization in tuning of Paleolithic and Neolithic pipes” (Nikolsky, 2015, Appendix-2).

75. ^The median ratio of effective population size to census size remains exceedingly low across 43 mammalian species, constituting on average 0.003 (Nei and Graur, 1984). The method of mismatch analysis, introduced by Rogers and Harpending (1992), allows for estimation of size and timing of ancient demographic based on the genetic data. Population growth at the time of expansion is estimated to be 100-fold or even greater (Rogers, 1997). And the timing of it clusters around 50,000 BP (Sherry et al., 1994). The African expansion of this time suggests a demographic picture with sparse population outside of Africa, while a rapid population explosion inside of Africa (Relethford, 1998).

76. ^If the Divje Babe pipe is indeed not a byproduct of the hyena bite (Diedrich, 2015), but rather a Neanderthal musical instrument (Turk, 2014), then the Neanderthal expansion to Altai would have created a Paleolithic border between the frequency- and timbre-based music.

References

Aberle, D. F. (1952). Arctic hysteria and latah in Mongolia. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 14, 291–297. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1952.tb01125.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adkins, C. J. (1974). Investigation of the sound-producing mechanism of the jew's harp. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 55, 667–670. doi: 10.1121/1.1914580

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Agapitov, N. N., and Khangalov, M. N. (1885). Data for research on shamanism in Siberia. Shamanism amongst Buryats from the Irkutsk Province [Материалы для изучения шаманства в Сибири. Шаманство у бурят Иркутской Губернии]. Proc. East Siberian Imperial Russ. Geogr. Soc. 14, 1–61.

Agatova, A. R., Nazarov, A. N., Nepop, R. K., and Rodnight, H. (2012). Holocene glacier fluctuations and climate changes in the southeastern part of the Russian Altai (South Siberia) based on a radiocarbon chronology. Q. Sci. Rev. 43, 74–93. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.04.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Agrawal, P. K. (2018). Indian Culture, Art and Heritage. New Delhi: Prabhat Prakashan.

Google Scholar

Aizenshtadt, A. M. (1982). “With kets and selkups [У кетов и селькупов],” in Music of Siberia and Far East [Музыка Сибири и Дальнего Востока], ed I. Romashuk (Moscow: Sovetskii Kompozitor [Советский композитор]), 175–204.

Aleksandrova, N. (2017). “Frame-shaped Jew's harps in archeological monuments at the Kama and Vyatka interfluve [Пластинчатые варганы в археологических памятниках междуречья Камы и Вятки],” in Problems of Organology, ed I. V. Matsiyevskii (Sankt-Petersburg: Russian Institute of History of Arts [Российский институт истории искусств]), 83–91.

Alekseev, I. Y. (1988). The Art of Playing Yakut Khomus [Искусство игры на якутском хомусе]. Yakutsk: Preprint.

Alekseyenko, A. M. (1988). “Musical instruments of the peoples of North East Siberia [Музыкальные инструменты народов севера Западной Сибири],” in Material and Spiritual Cultures of Siberian Peoples [Материальная и духовная культура народов Сибири], ed C. M. Taksami (Leningrad: Nauka, The Institute of Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Science), 5–23.

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1967). Do Yakuts have polyphony? [Есть ли у якутов многоголосие]. Sovetskaya Muzyka 5, 97–105. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/work3.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1986). Early Folkloric Intonation. Pitch Aspect [Раннефольклорное интонирование: звуковысотный аспект]. Moscow: Soviet Composer. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/rfi/index.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1988). Folklore in the Context of Modern Culture: A Discourse About the Future of Folk Song [Фольклор в контексте современной культуры: рассуждения о судьбах народной песни]. Moscow: Soviet Composer. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/fic/index.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1991a). “Jaw Harp: undisclosed perspectives of research…[Варган: нераскрытые исследовательские перспективы],” in Jew's Harp (khomus) and its music. Proceedings of the First All-Union Conference, 1988 [Варган (хомус) и его музыка. Материалы I Всесоюзной конференции 1988], ed E. Alekseyev (Yakutsk: Yakut Institute of language, literature and history of the USSR Academy of Science), 6–14. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/work7.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1991b). “Jaw Harp that is playing, singing, talking…[Варган играющий, поющий, говорящий],” in 2nd International Jew's Harp Congress-Festival at Yakutsk (Yakutsk: International Jew's Harp Society). Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/work35.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (1993). Speaking and Singing: Prolegomena to Anthropophonics [Пение и говорение. Основы антропофоники]. Moscow: The Institute of History of Arts at the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/work42.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (2008). “Singing in culturally-specific mental disorders of the Northern Siberian peoples [Пение при культурно-специфичных психических расстройствах у народов сибирского Севера],” in [Миф, символ, ритуал. Народы Сибири] Myth, Symbol, Ritual. Peoples of Siberia, ed S. Y. Nekliudov (Moscow: Russian State Humanitarian University), 95–107. Available online at: http://eduard.alekseyev.org/work4.html

Alekseyev, E. Y. (2016). The Yakut folk song: a brief ethnographic-musical sketch. Anthropol. Archeol. Eurasia 55, 41–59. doi: 10.1080/10611959.2016.1263484

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alekseyev, N. A. (1992). Traditional Religious Beliefs of Turkic-Speaking Peoples of Siberia [Традиционные религиозные верования тюркоязычных народов Сибири]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Alekseyev, G. G. (1986). “Khomus, play your song for them! [Заиграй им, хомус, свою песню],” in Music of Russia: Musical Creativity and Musical Life in Republics of Russian Federation [Музыка России: музыкальное творчество и музыкальная жизнь республик Российской Федерации], ed A. Grigoryeva (Moscow: Soviet Composer), 321–332.

Alexeyev, I., and Shishigin, S. S. (2004). The music of the Yakut traditional khomus. J. Int. Jews Harp Soc. 1, 88–94.

Allen, E. J., and Oxenham, A. J. (2014). Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 135, 1371–1379. doi: 10.1121/1.4863269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, D. G., and Bissett, T. G. (2015). “The initial colonization of north America: sea level change, shoreline movement, and great migrations,” in Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas, eds M. D. Frachetti and R. N. I. Spengler (Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing), 59–88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15138-0_6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andreyev, N. D., and Sunik, O. P. (1982). On the problem of relationship between Altaic languages and methods of its solution [О проблеме родства алтайских языков и методах ее решения]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2, 26–36.

Andreyeva, J. V. (1987). “Bronze age of far east [Бронзовый век Дальнеrо Востока],” in Archaeology of the USSR. Bronze Age of the forest zone of the USSR [Археология СССР. Эпоха бронзы лесной полосы СССР], ed B. A. Rybakov (Moscow: Nauka), 351–357.

Antonov, N. K. (1997). “Yakut language [Якутский язык],” in Languages of the World. Turkic Languages [Языки мира: Тюркские языки], ed E. R. Tenishev (Bishkek: Russian Academy of Science, Kyrkyzstan), 17–34.

Antoshina, M. N. (1939). “Musical Development of children in children music school [Музыкальное развитие детей в детской музыкальной школе],” in To a Music Teacher [Музыканту педагогу], ed G. Prokofiev (Moscow: Muzgiz), 25–44.

Anuchin, V. I. (1926). “The causes of population extinction in Northern Siberia [Причины вымирания населения в северной Сибири],” in A Collection of Works Dedicated to Vladimir M. Bekhterev (for the 40th Anniversary of His Professorship [Сборник, посвященный Владимиру Михайловичу Бехтереву (к 40-летию профессорской деятельности)], ed V. M. Bekhterev (Leningrad: State Academy of Psychoneurology & State Institute of Brain Research), 649–661.

Arakelova, A. O. (2012). Professional Music Education during the Formative Period (1918-1930s) [Профессиональное музыкальное образование в период становления (1918-1930-е годы)]. World Sci. Cult. Educ. 2, 312–315.

Arcones, P. C. (2013). Sons of Heaven, Brothers of Nature: The Naxi of Southwest China. Kunming: Papers of the White Drago.

Google Scholar

Arkhipov, N. D. (1989). Ancient Cultures of Yakutia [Древние культуры Якутии]. Yakutsk: Yakut Book Publishing.

ASA (1951). American Standard Acoustical Terminology, Vol. 25, eds L. Beranek, K. C. Morrical, and J. W. McNair. New York, NY: American Standards Association.

Atkinson, Q. D., Gray, R. D., and Drummond, A. J. (2009). Bayesian coalescent inference of major human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup expansions in Africa. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 367–373. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0785

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Austin, M. H. (1930). The American Rhythm: Studies and Reexpressions of Amerindian Songs. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Google Scholar

Avdeyev, A. D. (1960). “Mask. The experiment in typological classification according to ethnographic data [Маска. Опыт типологическои классификации по этнографическим материалам],” in Collection of Works of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography [Сборник Музея антропологии и этнографии], ed L. P. Tolstov (Moscow; Leningrad: Museum of anthropology and ethnography), 39–110.

Baipakov, K. M., and Taimagambetov, Z. K. (2006). Archaeology of Khazakhstan [Археология Казахстана]. Almaty: Kazakh Universitety.

Bakx, P., and Crane, F. (2017). The 1000 Names of the Jew's harp. Nomenclature of Over Thousand Proper Names for the Jew's Harp from All Over the World, 28. Middelburg: Foundation Antropodium. Available online at: http://www.antropodium.nl/Duizend Namen Mhp NOMENCLATUUR.htm (accessed January 1, 2019).

Balzano, G. J. (1986). What are musical pitch and timbre? Music Percept. Interdiscipl. J. 3, 297–314. doi: 10.2307/40285339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barinova, E. (2013). Ethnocultural Contacts of China with Ethnicities of Central Asia in Antiquity and Middle Ages [Этнокультурные контакты Китая с народами Центральной Азии в древности и средневековье]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Science.

Barr, W. (1994). The Eighteenth Century Trade between the Ships of the Hudson's Bay Company and the Hudson Strait Inuit. Arctic 47, 236–246. doi: 10.14430/arctic1294

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrett, M. (2011). Musical narratives: a study of a young child's identity work in and through music-making. Psychol. Music 39, 403–423. doi: 10.1177/0305735610373054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartlett, J. C., and Snelus, P. (1980). Lifespan memory for popular songs. Am. J. Psychol. 93, 551. doi: 10.2307/1422730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bar-Yosef, O., Eren, M. I., Yuan, J., Cohen, D. J., and Li, Y. (2012). Were bamboo tools made in prehistoric Southeast Asia? An experimental view from South China. Q. Int. 269, 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beck, C. M., Deeds, E. E., Pozorski, S., and Pozorski, T. (1983). Pajatambo: an 18th century roadside structure in Peru. Histor. Archaeol. 17, 55–68. doi: 10.1007/BF03374031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beliayev, V. M. (1933). Musical Instruments of Uzbekistan [Музыкальные инструменты Узбекистана]. Moscow: Gos Muz Izdat [Гос. музыкальное изд-во].

Beliayeva-Ekzempliarskaya, S. (1925). “Musical experience in preschool age [Музыкальное переживание в дошкольном возрасте],” in Collection of Works of the Physiolo-psychological Department [Сборник работ физиолого-психологической секции], ed S. Beliayeva-Ekzempliarskaya (Moscow: The State Institute of Musical Science [Гос ин-та музыкальной науки.]), 3–29.

Bicheool, V. (2009). The current state of Nganasan culture [Современное состояние культуры нганасан]. Herald Chelyabinsk State Acad. Cult. Arts 4, 49–54.

Google Scholar

Bjørkvold, J. R. (1992). The Muse Within: Creativity and Communication, Song and Play from Childhood Through Maturity. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

Blacking, J. (1967). Venda Children's Songs: A Study in Ethnomusicological Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar

Blench, R. (2004). “Musical aspects of Austronesian culture,” in Proceedings of the Xth Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists Conference, London 2004, eds L. Bacus and I. Glover (Cambridge, UK: Kay Williamson Educational Foundation), 1–10.

Google Scholar

Blium, D. (1977). “The role of dictation in development of professional musical hearing [Роль диктанта в развитии профессионального музыкального слуха],” in Development of Musical Hearing [Воспитание музыкального слуха, ed A. Agazhanov (Moscow: Muzyka [Музыка]), 86–117.

Bogoras, W. (1910). On Psychology of Shamnism Amongst the Peoples of North-Eastern Asia [К психологии шаманства у народов Северо-Восточной Азии]. Moscow: The Imperial Moscow University Publishing.

Bonnel, A.-M., Faita, F., Peretz, I., and Besson, M. (2001). Divided attention between lyrics and tunes of operatic songs: evidence for independent processing. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1201–1213. doi: 10.3758/BF03194534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borodovskii, A. P. (2007). Ancient Carved Horn From Southern Siberia of the Paleometallic Age [Древний резной рог Южной Сибири эпохи палеометалла] (Dissertation). The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, The Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Borodovskii, A. P. (2017). “Bone Jaw Harps and their workpieces of the Hunno-Sarmatian period in the North Altai region [Костяные варганы и их заготовки гунно-сарматского времени на территории Северного Алтая],” in Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories [Проблемы археологии, этнографии, антропологии Сибири и сопредельных территорий], eds A. P. Derevianko and V. I. Molodin (Novosibirsk: The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of Russian Academy of Science), 279–283.

Brodianskii, D. L. (1978). “Yet another field of neolithic art in Far East [Еще одна область неолитического искусства на Дальнем Востоке],” in At the Origin of Creativity. Primitive Art [У истоков творчества. Первобытное искусство], ed R. S. Vasilyevskii (Novosibirsk: Nauka), 133–141.

Brodsky, I. A. (1972). Music of Peoples of Far East of the USSR [Музыка народов Дальнего Востока СССР] LP. Moscow: Melodiya.

Bronson, B. (1996). “Metals, specialization, and development in Early Eastern and Southern Asia,” in Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, ed B. Wailes (Philadelphia, PA: The University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania), 177–186.

Google Scholar

Brown, S. (2007). Contagious heterophony: a new theory about the origins of music. Musicae Scientiae 11, 3–26. doi: 10.1177/102986490701100101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bulgakova, T. D. (2000). “Traditional views of the Nanai on music [Традиционные представления нанайцев о музыке],” in Musical Ethnography of Tungus-Manchu Peoples. International Conference at Yakutsk [Музыкальная этнография тунгусо-маньчжурских народов] (Yakutsk: The Institute of Problems of Exploration of North), 36–37.

Google Scholar

Bulgakova, T. D. (2001). Music in traditional Nanai culture [Музыка в традиционной нанайской культуре]. Inform. Bull. Russ. Found. Basic Res. 3, 213–218.

Bunker, E. C. (1993). Gold in the ancient Chinese world: a cultural puzzle. Artibus Asiae 53, 27–50. doi: 10.2307/3250506

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buzhilova, A., Derevianko, A., and Shunkov, M. (2017). The northern dispersal route bioarchaeological data from the late Pleistocene of Altai, Siberia. Curr. Anthropol. 58, S491–S503. doi: 10.1086/694232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caclin, A., Giard, M.-H., Smith, B. K., and McAdams, S. (2007). Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study. Brain Res. 1138, 159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell, P. S. (1998). Songs in Their Heads: Music and Its Meaning in Children's Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Canave-Dioquino, C., Santos, R. P., and Maceda, J. (2008). “The philippines,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 415–445.

Carlson, R., Granstrom, B., and Fant, G. (1970). Some studies concerning perception of isolated vowels. STL-QPSR 11, 19–35.

Google Scholar

Chernykh, E. N. (1966). History of the Earliest Metallurgy of Eastern Europe [История древнеишеи металлургии Восточнои Европы]. Moscow: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Chernykh, E. N. (1992). Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR: The Early Metal Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Chernykh, E. N. (2012). “The northern hunters, fishers and gatherers and their southern neighbours in Eurasia in the early metal age,” in Networks, Interaction and Emerging Identities in Fennoscandia and Beyond (Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne), 105–122. Available online at: https://www.sgr.fi/sust/sust265/sust265_chernykh.pdf (accessed February 14, 2019).

Google Scholar

Christian, D. (2000). Silk roads or steppe roads? The silk roads in world history. J. World History 11, 1–26. doi: 10.1353/jwh.2000.0004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chuluunbaatar, O. (2016). “Rare archaeological musical artefacts from ancient tombs in Mongolia,” in Studia Instrumentorum Musicae Popularis, ed G. Jähnichen (Münster: MV Wissenschaft), 225–250.

Ciarla, R. (2007). Rethinking Yuanlongpo: the case for technological links between the Lingnan (PRC) and central Thailand in the Bronze Age. East West 57, 305–328. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29757731

Google Scholar

Coghlan, H. H. (1939). Prehistoric copper and some experiments in smelting. Trans. Newcomen Soc. 20, 49–65. doi: 10.1179/tns.1939.005.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crabtree, D. E., and Davis, E. L. (1968). Experimental manufacture of wooden implements with tools of flaked stone. Science 159, 426–428. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3813.426.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crane, F. (1982). Jew's (Jaw's? Jeu? Jeugd? Gew-gaw? Juice?) Harp. Vierundzwanzigstel- jahrschrift der Internationalen Maultrommelvirtuosengenossenschaft 1, 29–41.

Crane, F. (2007). Review of Jew's harps in European archaeology. J. Int. Jews Harp Soc. 4, 68–69.

Google Scholar

Cross, I. (1999). “Is music the most important thing we ever did? Music, development and evolution,” in Music, Mind and Science, ed S. W. Yi (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), 10–39.

Google Scholar

Cross, I., and Morley, I. (2009). “The evolution of music: theories, definitions and the nature of the evidence,” in Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship, ed T. C. Malloch (London: Oxford University Press), 61–82.

Czaplicka, M. (1914). Aboriginal Siberia, A study in Social Anthropology. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Google Scholar

Davis, B. L., and MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 38, 1199–1211. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3806.1199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, B. L., and Zajdo, K. (2008). The Syllable in Speech Production: Perspectives on the Frame Content Theory. Abingdon; Oxfordshire: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar

de Ramón, I. A., and Rivera, I. A. (1982). Indigenous music of Venezuela. World Mus. 24, 22–37.

Google Scholar

Devlet, M. A. (1976). Petroglyphs of Ulug-Khem [Петроглифы Улуг-Хема]. Moscow: Nauka.

Devlet, M. A. (1980). Petroglyphs of Mugur-Sargol [Петроглифы Мугур-Саргола]. Moscow: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Devlet, Y. G., and Devlet, M. A. (2011). The Treasures of Rock Art of North and Central Asia [Сокровища наскального искусства Севернои и Центральнои Азии]. Moscow: Institute of Archaeology at Russian Academy of Science.

Google Scholar

Dickinson, K. (2001). ‘Believe'? Vocoders, digitalised female identity and camp. Popular Mus. 20, 333–347. doi: 10.1017/S0261143001001532

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixon, E. J. (2015). “Late Pleistocene colonization of north America from northeast Asia: new insights from large-scale paleogeographic reconstructions,” in Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas, eds M. D. Frachetti and R. N. I. Spengler (Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing), 169–184. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15138-0_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dobzhanskaya, O. (1991). “Chukchi playing patterns on frame Jew's Harps [Чукотские наигрыши на рамном варгане],” in Jew's Harp (khomus) and Its Music. Proceedings of the First All-Union Conference, 1988 [Варган (хомус) и его музыка. Материалы I Всесоюзной конференции 1988], ed E. Y. Alekseyev (Yakutsk: Yakut Institute of Language, Literature and History of the USSR Academy of Science), 52–58.

Dobzhanskaya, O. (2008). Shamanic music of samoyed ethnoses in the syncretic unity of ritual [Шаманская музыка самодииских народов в синкретическом единстве обряда] (Dissertation). The Moscow State Conservatory named after Tchaikovsky, The Department of Music Theory.

Dobzhanskaya, O. (2017). Personal songs of tundra Nenets of Taimyr [Личные песни тундровых ненцев Таимыра]. Cult. Civil. 7, 565–575.

Google Scholar

Dorina, M. V. (2004). Wind and percussive instruments of Sayano-Altaian Turks: An attempt of historic-ethnographic investigation [Духовые и Ударные Музыкальные Инструменты Тюрков Саяно-Алтая (Опыт Историко-Этнографического Исследования)] (Dissertation). Tomsk University, Department of Ethnography and History of Science.

Dorokhova, Y. A. (1995). “Types of ritual vocal intonation and structure of traditional society [Виды ритуального вокального интонирования и структура традиционного сообщества],” in Voice Abd Ritual. Proceedings of the Conference [Голос и ритуал. Материалы конференции. Май 1995], eds Y. A. Dorokhova, N. I. Zhulanova, and O. A. Pashina (Moscow), 89–93.

Dournon-Taurelle, G. (1975). “La Guimbarde,” in Paris Nanterre University (Dissertation). Paris Nanterre University, Maison de l'archeologie et de l'ethnologie Rene Ginouves.

Dournon-Taurelle, G., and Wright, J. (1978). Les Guimbardes du Musée de l'Homme. Paris: Institut d'Ethnologie, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle.

Dowling, W. J. (1984). Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Adv. Psychol. 19, 145–163. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62350-X

CrossRef Full Text

Drabkin, W. (2001). “Theme,” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, eds S. Sadie and J. Tyrrell (London: Macmillan Publishers). doi: 10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.27789

CrossRef Full Text

During, J., and During, E. (2015). “De l'espace lisse au temps troué: à propos des musiques nomades,” in Deleuze et la Musique, eds P. Criton and J.-M. Chouvel (Paris: Centre de Documentation de la Musique Contemporaine (CDMC)), 327–330.

Google Scholar

Duvan, N. D. (2000). “Personality of Ulch Shaman and his ritual [Личность ульчского шамана и его ритуал],” in Musical Ethnography of Tungus-Manchu peoples. International Conference at Yakutsk [Музыкальная этнография тунгусо-маньчжурских народов], ed Y. Sheikin (Yakutsk: The Institute of Problems of Exploration of North), 51–53.

Duvan, N. D. (2003). “Musical instruments of Ulch people [Музыкальные инструменты ульчей],” in Papers of Grodekovsky Museum, eds N. Ruban and T. Melnikova (Khabarovsk: Khabarovsk regional folk museum named after Grodekovsky), 57–72.

Dyakonova, V. (2011). [Изучение хомуса и его современное развитие в Якутии] “Investigation of khomus and its contemporary development in Yakutia,” in [Фольклор в контексте культуры] Folklore in the Context of Culture, ed M. Abdulayeva (Makhachkala: Dagestan State pedagogical University), 26–30.

Dyakonova, V. (2015). Expedition to Chukotka Autonomous Region: Diary, Audio- and Video-Recordings, Photographs [Комплексная экспедиция в Чукотский автономный округ: дневники, аудио- и видеозаписи, фотографии]. Yakutsk.

Dyakonova, V. (2017). Musical instruments of Sakha people in light of classic typologies [Музыкальные инструменты народа саха в свете классических типологий] (Dissertation). The Department of Art Studies, The Arctic State Institute of Art and Culture, Yakutsk, Russia.

Dyakonova, V. E., and Grigoryeva, V. G. (2017). “On the healing properties of sound in traditional Sakha culture [О целительных своиствах звука в традиционнои культуре саха],” in Medical ethnography: contemporary approaches and conceptions [Медицинская этнография: современные подходы и концепции], ed V. I. Kharitonova (Moscow: Institute of Ethnography & Anthropology of Russian Academy of Science, OOO Publicity), 160–172.

Dyakonova, V. P. (1981). “Tuvan shamans and their social role in society [Тувинские шаманы и их социальная роль в обществе],” in Problems of History of Social Consciousness of Siberian Aborigenes [Проблемы истории общественного сознания аборигенов Сибири], ed I. S. Vdovin (Leningrad: Nauka), 129–164.

Emsheimer, E. (1986). “Jew's harps in Siberia and Middle Asia [Варганы в Сибири и Средней Азии],” in Problems of Traditional Instrumental Music of Peoples of USSR: Instrument-Performer-Music [Проблемы традиционной инструментальной музыки народов СССР: Инструмент-исполнитель-музыка], ed I. Matsiyevskii (Leningrad: LGITMiK), 80–94.

Endovitskaya, T. V. (1959). “On the pitch discriminatory sensitivity in children of the preschool age [О звуковысотной различительной чувствительности у детей дошкольного возраста],” in Reports of the Academy of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences (Leningrad: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Russia), 42–46.

Endovitskaya, T. V. (1964). “Development of sensation and perception in the preschool age children [Развитие ощущения и восприятия у детей дошкольного возраста],” in Psychol. Presch. Age Child. [Психология детей дошкольного возраста], eds A. V Zaporozhets and D. B. Elkonin (Moscow: Prosvesheniye), 13–71.

Erb-Satullo, N. L. (2011). “Alloys from anau: the manipulation of metallic properties in 3rd Millennium B.C. Southern Central Asia,” in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology MRS Symposium Proceedings, eds P. Vandiver, W. Li, S. Ruvalcaba, C. L. Reedy, and L. D. Frame (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157–163. doi: 10.1557/opl.2011.739

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Everstova, A. V., Afanasyeva, D. N., and Arzhakova, S. N. (2019). “Jaw harp therapy and throat singing as a method of rehabilitation of children with delay in speech development [Xомусотерапия и горловое пение как метод восстановительного лечения детей с задержкой речевого развития],” in Health as a Resource - v.2 [Здоровье как ресурс - 2] ed C. A. Markov (Nizhnii Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii State University named after Lobachevsky).

Fales, C. (2002). The paradox of timbre. Ethnomusicology 46, 56–95. doi: 10.2307/852808

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feodorov, G. B. (1954). The results of 3-year work in Moldovia in Slavic-Russian archaeology [Итоги трёхлетних работ в Молдавии в области славяно-русской археологии]. Brief Commun. Instit. Archaeol. 56, 8–23.

Fernald, A. (1992). “Meaningful melodies in mothers' speech to infants,” in Nonverbal Vocal Communication Comparative and Developmental Approaches, eds H. Papousek, U. Jurgens, and M. Papousek (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 262–282.

Google Scholar

Fischer, H. (1986). Sound-Producing Instruments in Oceania: Construction and Playing Technique - Distribution and Function, ed D. Niles. Boroko: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.

Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1978). On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica 32, 80–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1978.tb00329.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fomin, V. P. (2018). Children phono-instruments of Southern Altaians [Детские фоноинструменты южных алтаицев]. World Sci. Cult. Educ. 2, 373–375.

Google Scholar

Foster, M. L. (1994). “Symbolism: the foundation of culture,” in Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, ed T. Ingold (New York, NY: Routledge), 366–395.

Google Scholar

Foulks, E. F. (1985). “The transformation of arctic hysteria,” in The Culture-Bound Syndromes (Dordrecht: Springer), 307–324. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-5251-5_28

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fox, L. (1988). The Jew's Harp: A Comprehensive Anthology, 2nd Edn. London, Lewisburg PA: Associated University Presses, Bucknell University Press.

Google Scholar

Fox, L. (1994). Kulturgeschichte der Maultrommel. Notes 50, 927–929. doi: 10.2307/898542

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Francfort, H.-P. (1994). The Central Asian dimension of the symbolic system in Bactria and Margiana. Antiquity 68, 406–418. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00046755

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frayonov, V. P. (1981). “Texture [фактура],” in Encyclopedia of Music [Музыкальная энциклопедия], 754–761.

French, J. C. (2016). Demography and the palaeolithic archaeological record. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 23, 150–199. doi: 10.1007/s10816-014-9237-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Funk, D. A. (2006). “Economic activities and materialized culture [Хозяйственные занятия и материализованная культура],” in Turkic Peoples of Siberia [Тюркские народы Сибири], eds D. A. Funk and N. A. Tomilov (Moscow: Nauka), 186–204.

Google Scholar

Gadzhiyeva, N. E. (1997). “Turkic languages [Тюркские языки],” in Languages of the World. Turkic Languages [Языки мира: Тюркские языки], ed E. R. Tenishev (Bishkek: Russian Academy of Science), 17–34.

Galaiskaya, R. B. (1973). “Jaw Harp by the ethnicities of the Soviet Union: on the issue of archaism and folk music instruments [Варган у народов Советского Союза: к вопросу об архаизмах и народном музыкальном инструментарии],” in Problems of Musical Folklore of the USSR Peoples: Articles and Data, ed I. I. Zemtsovskii (Moscow: Muzyka [Музыка]), 328–350.

Galaiskaya, R. B. (1987). The Jew's Harp among the Peoples of the Soviet Union. Vierundzwangzigsteljahresschrift der Internationalen Maultrommelvirtuosengenossensch 3, 11–38.

Galdanova, G. R. (1987). Pre-lamaistic Beliefs of Byriats [Доламаистские верования бурят]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Gamov, I. I. (1894). Sketches on Distant Siberia [Очерки далекой Сибири]. Gomel: Ya. G. Syrkin Publishing.

Garfias, R. (1990). “An ethnomusicologist's thoughts on the processes of language and music acquisition,” in Music and Child Development: Proceedings of the 1987 Denver Conference, eds F. Wilson and F. Roehmann (Ann Arbor, MI: Book Crafters), 100–105. Available online at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=558324 (accessed July 17, 2018).

Google Scholar

Garner, J. (2015). “Bronze Age tin mines in central Asia, in Archaeometallurgy in Europe III. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum, eds A. Hauptmann and D. Modarressi-Tehrani (Bochum: Springer), 135–144.

Gelegdorj, E. (2015). “Copper exploitation, ore dressing and bronze melting activities of ancient habitants of Mongolia [К вопросу о добыче, обогащении и плавке меди древними жителями Монголии],” in Ancient Metallurgy of the Sayan-Altai and East Asia, eds Y. Murakami and Y. Esin (Abakan: Ekhime University Press), 25–34.

Gemuyev, I. N. (2000). Mansi People: The Embodiment of a Myth [Народ манси: воплощение мифа]. Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnography.

Gemuyev, I. N., and Sagalayev, A. M. (1986). Religion of Mansi People. Cult Locations of the 19th-early 20th Centuries [Религия народа манси. Культовые места XIX — начала XX в]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Goldstein, J. L. (1973). An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 54, 1496–1516. doi: 10.1121/1.1914448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goltsova, T. V., Osipova, L. P., Zhadanov, S. I., and Villems, R. (2005). The effect of marriage migration on the genetic structure of the Taimyr Nganasan population: genealogical analysis inferred from MtDNA markers. Russ. J. Genet. 41, 779–788. doi: 10.1007/s11177-005-0160-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Golubkova, A. N., and Ivanov, A. G. (1997). Ancient jaw harps of kama area [Древние Варганы Прикамья]. Courier Udmurt Univ. 8, 93–107.

Grachiova, G. N. (1983). Traditional Worldview of the Taimyr Hunters (based on Nganasan data, XIX-XX centuries) [Традиционное мировоззрение охотников Таймыра (на материалах нганасан XIX–XX века)]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Green, M., and Hodge, P. (1980). Inuit Throat And Harp Songs, Eskimo Women's Music of Povungnituk. Toronto, ON: The Canadian Music Heritage Collection.

Grigoryan, G. A. (1957). “Music culture of Yakut ASSR [Музыкальная культура Якутской АССР],” in Music Culture of the Autonomous Republics of the Russian Federation [Музыкальная культура автономных республик РСФСР], ed G. I. Litinskii (Moscow: Muzgiz), 331–348.

Grigoryeva, A. M. (1996). Folk Healing of the People in Yakutia of the XVII-XX Centuries [Народное врачевание в Якутии: XVII-XX вв.]. Moscow: Institute of archaeology and ethnography of Russian Academy of Science.

Grimault, N., Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., and Collet, L. (2002). Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 189–197. doi: 10.3758/BF03195785

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grove, M. (2012). “The archaeology of group size,” in Social Brain, Distributed Mind, eds R. Dunbar, C. Gamble, and J. Gowlett (London: British Academy), 391–411.

Google Scholar

Grove, M., Pearce, E., and Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Fission-fusion and the evolution of hominin social systems. J. Hum. Evol. 62, 191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haid, G. (1999). The trump and eroticism. Vie rundzwanzigsteljahrsschrift der Internationalen Maultrommelvirtuosengenossenschaft 8, 60–80.

Hais, M., Komprdová, K., Ermakov, N., and Chytrý, M. (2015). Modelling the Last Glacial Maximum environments for a refugium of Pleistocene biota in the Russian Altai Mountains, Siberia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 438, 135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halpern, A. R., and Bartlett, J. C. (2010). “Memory for Melodies,” in Music Perception, eds M. R. Jones, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (New York, NY: Springer), 233–258. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halpern, A. R., and Bartlett, J. C. (2011). The persistence of musical memories: a descriptive study of earworms. Music Percept. Interdiscipl. J. 28, 425–432. doi: 10.1525/mp.2011.28.4.425

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hartley, J. M. (2014). Siberia: A History of the People. Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press. doi: 10.12987/yale/9780300167948.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text

Hassan, F. A. (1981). Demographic Archaeology. New York, NY: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-624180-8.50010-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hauptmann, A. (2007). The Archaeometallurgy of Copper. Evidence from Faynan, Jordan. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72238-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hauser-Schäublin, B. (1995). “Puberty rites, women's Naven, and initiation: women's rituals of transition in Abelam and Iatmul culture,” in Gender Rituals: Female Initiation in Melanesia, eds N. C. Lutkehaus and P. B. Roscoe (London: Routledge), 33–53.

Google Scholar

Herva, V.-P., Ikäheimo, J., Kuusela, J.-M., and Nordqvist, K. (2009). “Close encounters of the copper kind,” in Proceedings of the 10th Nordic TAG Conference: Stiklestad, Norway, eds R. Berge, M. E. Jasinski, and K. Sognnes (London: Britsh Archaeological Reports), 109–115.

Google Scholar

Higham, C., Higham, T., Ciarla, R., Douka, K., Kijngam, A., and Rispoli, F. (2011). The origins of the bronze age of Southeast Asia. J. World Prehistory 24, 227–274. doi: 10.1007/s10963-011-9054-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffecker, J. F., and Elias, S. A. (2007). Human Ecology of Beringia. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. doi: 10.7312/hoff13060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Honeychurch, W. (2015). Inner Asia and the Spatial Politics of Empire: Archaeology, Mobility, and Culture Contact. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1815-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hope, G., Kershaw, A. P., van der Kaars, S., Xiangjun, S., Liew, P. M., Heusser, L. E., et al. (2004). History of vegetation and habitat change in the Austral-Asian region. Q. Int. 118–119, 103–126. doi: 10.1016/S1040-6182(03)00133-2

CrossRef Full Text

Houtsma, A. J. M., and Smurzynski, J. (1990). Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 87, 304–310. doi: 10.1121/1.399297

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, T.-H. (2001). “Taiwan: music of the Taiwan aborigines,” in The Garland Encyclopedia of World Music, Volume 7, East Asia: China, Japan and Korea, eds R. C. Provine, Y. Tokumaru, and L. Witzleben (London: Routledge), 523–529.

Hung, H., and Chao, C. (2016). Taiwan's early metal age and southeast Asian trading systems. Antiquity 90, 1537–1551. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2016.184

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huo, W. (2016). On the early metal objects and early Metal Age in Tibet. Chin. Archaeol. 16, 91–96. doi: 10.1515/char-2016-0008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: a derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Percept. 19, 1–64. doi: 10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishi, S. (1916). “The Island of Formosa and its primitive inhabitants,” in Transactions and Proceedings of the Japan Society London, ed H. L. Joly (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co), 38–60.

Ivanov, S. V. (1975). Masks of Siberian Peoples [Маски народов Сибири]. Leningrad: Avrora.

Jaago, C. (2009). Estonian Jew's Harp Stories: The Reproduction and Restoration of Melody-Play Tradition. Available online at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2439116 (accessed June 13, 2018).

Google Scholar

Jaffe-Berg, E. (2001). Forays into grammelot the language of nonsense. J. Dramat. Theor. Crit. 2, 3–16.

Google Scholar

Jochelson, W. (1910). The Yukaghir and the Yukaghirized Tungus. Leiden: E. J. Brill ltd.; G.E. Stechert.

Google Scholar

Jochelson, W. (1928). Peoples of Asiatic Russia. Washington DC: The American Museum of Natural History. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.68269

CrossRef Full Text

Jordania, J. (2006). Who Asked the First Question? The Origins of Human Choral Singing, Intelligence, Language and Speech. Tbilisi, GA: Logos.

Google Scholar

Kalinichenko, E. P., and Alekseyev, M. A. (2009). “Meditative-imagery musical (Jaw Harp) psychotherapy as a method of medical rehabilitation of patients with posttraumatic stress disorders. [Медитативно-образная музыкальная (варганная) психотерапия как метод медицинской реабилитации пациентов с посттравматическими стрессовыми реакциями,” in Achievements and Perspectives of Medical Rehabilitation: Proceedings of the Conference Dedicated to 75 Year Anniversary of the Air Force Sanatorium at Chemitokvadzhe [Достижения и перспективы медицинской реабилитации: материалы научно-практической конференции, 4-6 июня 2009 года, г. Сочи, военный санаторий Чемитоквадже], ed V. V. Yamenskov (Sochi: Federal State Department), 338–340.

Kaniuth, K. (2007). The Metallurgy of the Late Bronze Age Sapalli Culture (Southern Uzbekistan) and its implications for the “tin question.” Iranica Antiqua 42, 23–40. doi: 10.2143/IA.42.0.2017869

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kartomi, M. J. (2012). Musical Journeys in Sumatra. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. doi: 10.5406/illinois/9780252036712.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kartomi, M. J., Sutton, R. A., Suanda, E., Williams, S., and Harnish, D. (2008). “Indonesia,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 334–405.

Google Scholar

Kendall, R. A., and Carterette, E. C. (1993). Identification and blend of timbres as a basis for orchestration. Contemp. Music Rev. 9, 51–67. doi: 10.1080/07494469300640341

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kholopova, V. (1979). Texture: An Essay [Фактура: Очерк]. Moscow: Muzyka [Музыка].

Kiriushin, Y. F. (2002). Eneolithic and early Bronze Ages of south of Eastern Siberia [Энеолит и ранняя бронза юга Западной Сибири]. Barnaul: The Altai University Publishing.

Google Scholar

Kirmayer, L. J. (2018). “Ethno- and cultural psychiatry,” in The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Vol. 11, ed H. Callan (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley). doi: 10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2362

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kiyekbayev, J. G. (1972). Introduction to Uralo-Altaic Linguistics [Введение в урало-алтаиское языкознание]. Ufa: Bashkir Book Publishing.

Ko, S., Joseph, A., and Whitman, J. B. (2014). “Comparative consequences of the tongue root harmony analysis for proto-Tungusic, proto-Mongolic, and proto-Korean,” in Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond, eds M. Robbeets and W. Bisang (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 141–176. doi: 10.1075/slcs.161.13ko

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kochmar, N. N. (1994). Petroglyphs of Yakutia. History and Culture of the East of Asia [Писаницы Якутии. История и культура Востока Азии]. Novosibirsk: The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of Russian Academy of Science.

Koizumi, F., Tokumaru, Y., and Yamaguchi, O. (1977). Asian Musics in an Asian Perspective. Report of Asian Traditional Performing Arts. Tokyo: Heibonsha Limited Publishers.

Kolltveit, G. (2006). Jew's Harps in European Archaeology. Oxford UK: Archaeopress.

Google Scholar

Kolltveit, G. (2009). The Jew's Harp in Western Europe: trade, communication, and innovation, 1150–1500. Yearbook Trad. Music 41, 42–61. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25735478

Google Scholar

Kolltveit, G. (2016). “Jew's harps of bone, wood and metal how to understand construction, classification and chronology,” in Studien zur Musikarchäologie, eds R. Eichmann, J. Fang, and L.-C. Koch (Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH), 63–73.

Kon'kova, L. V. (1989). Bronze Smelting Production in the South of the USSR Far East, the Turn of II-I m.BC to XIII Century AD [Бронзолитейное производство на юге Дальнего Востока СССР, рубеж II-I тыс. до н. э.-XIII век н. э]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Koops, L. H. (2012). “Now can I watch my video?”: exploring musical play through video sharing and social networking in an early childhood music class. Res. Stud. Mus. Educ. 34, 15–28. doi: 10.1177/1321103X12442994

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koskoff, E. (2008). The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: The Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Kreinovich, E. A. (1928). A Diary [Дневник]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Sakhalin Regional Museum of Natural Science.

Krumhansl, C. L. (1989). “Why is musical timbre so hard to understand,” in Perception of Electroacoustic Sound and Music, eds S. Nielzén and O. Olsson (New York, NY: Excerpta Medica), 43–54.

Krushanov, A. I. (1987). History and Culture of Chukchi: Historic-Ethnographic Sketches [История и культура чукчей: историко-этнографические очерки]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Kunanbayeva, A. (1987). A living legend. Vie rundzwanzigsteljahrsschrift der Internationalen Maultrommelvirtuosengenossenschaft 3, 66–69.

Kungurov, S. N. (1994). Udmurt Traditional Musical Instruments [Удмуртские традиционные музыкальные инструменты]. Izhevsk: Ministry of Culture of Udmurt Republic.

Kuzmina, E. E. (2008). The Prehistory of the Silk Road. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812292336

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kypchakova, L. V. (2006). On the matter of the Tree Cult of Altaians [К вопросу о культе деревьев у алтаицев]. Siberian Pedag. J. 3, 130–136.

Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Lahr, M. M., and Foley, R. A. (2001). “Genes, fossils and behavior: when and where do they fit?” in Genes, Fossils, and Behaviour: An Integrated Approach to Human Evolution, eds P. Donnelly and R. Foley (Amsterdam: IOS Press Ohmsha, NATO Science), 13–48.

Google Scholar

Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: evidence from eye-tracking. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 161, 32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Layton, R., and O'Hara, S. (2012). “Human social evolution: a comparison of hunter-gatherer and chimpanzee social organization,” in Social Brain, Distributed Mind, eds R. Dunbar, C. Gamble, and J. Gowlett (London: British Academy), 83–113.

Google Scholar

Le Roux, C. C. F. M. (1950). De Bergpapoea's van Nieuw - Guinea en hun Woongevied. Koninklijk. Leiden: Brill.

Lebedeva, G. C., and Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Sing that tune: infants' perception of melody and lyrics and the facilitation of phonetic recognition in songs. Infant Behav. Dev. 33, 419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ledang, O. K. (1972). On the acoustics and the systematic classification of the jaw's harp. Yearbook Int. Folk Music Council 4, 95–103.

Google Scholar

Lee, G. Y., and Kisilevsky, B. S. (2014). Fetuses respond to father's voice but prefer mother's voice after birth. Dev. Psychobiol. 56, 1–11. doi: 10.1002/dev.21084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leipp, É. (1963). Un ≪vocoder≫ mécanique: La guimbarde. Annales des Télécommunications 18, 82–87.

Leipp, É. (1967). La Guimbarde. Bulletin du Groupe d'Acoustique Musical Faculte des Sciences Paris 25, 25.

Google Scholar

Lembke, S. A., and McAdams, S. (2015). The role of spectral-envelope characteristics in perceptual blending of wind-instrument sounds. Acta Acust. United Acust. 101, 1039–1051. doi: 10.3813/AAA.918898

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leontyev, A. N. (2009). The Development of Mind. Selected Works of Aleksei Nikolaevich Leontyev, ed M. Cole (Transl. M. Kipylova). Kettering, OH: Bookmasters, Inc., 115–136.

Leontyev, N. V. (1978). “Anthropomorphic images of Okunevskaya culture [Антропоморфные изображения окуневской культуры],” in Siberia, Central and Eastern Asia in Antiquity: Neolithic and Age of Metal [Сибирь, Центральная и Восточная Азия в древности. Неолит и эпоха металла] (Novosibirsk: Nauka), 88–118.

Google Scholar

Leontyev, N. V., Kapelko, V. F., and Yesin, Y. N. (2006). Statues and Stelae of the Okunev Culture [Изваяния и стелы окуневскои культуры]. Abakan: Khakas Publishing House.

Google Scholar

Leshchenko, N. V., and Prokopets, S. P. (2015). Medieval musical instruments (based on data of Primorye artifacts [Средневековые музыкальные инструменты (по материалам памятников Приморья)]. Russ. Pac. 4, 222–235.

Google Scholar

Levin, T. C., and Suzukei, V. (2006). Where Rivers and Mountains Sing: Sound, Music, and Nomadism in Tuva and Beyond. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2013). “Cross-cultural universals and communication structures,” in Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship, ed M. A. Arbib (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 67–82. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018104.003.0003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, J. (2013). “A cross-cultural perspective on the significance of music and dance to culture and society: insight from BaYaka pygmies,” in Language, music, and the brain: a mysterious relationship, ed M. A. Arbib (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 45–66. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018104.003.0002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H. (1956). A comparative study of the Jew's Harps among the Aborigines of Formosa and East Asia. Bull. Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica 1, 85–140.

Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia 7, 128–134. doi: 10.1007/BF02156143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lisina, M. I. (1966). “Development of the cognitive capacity in children during their first half a year of life [Развитие познавательной деятельности детей первого полугодия жизни],” in Development of Perception in Early and Preschool Childhood. [Развитие восприятия в раннем и дошкольном детстве], eds A. V Zaporozhets and M. I. Lisina (Moscow: Prosvesheniye), 16–48.

Google Scholar

Loewy, J. V. (1995). The musical stages of speech: a developmental model of pre-verbal sound making. Music Ther. 13, 47–73. doi: 10.1093/mt/13.1.47

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lotman, Y. M. (2001). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London; New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.

L'vova, E. E., Oktiabr'skaya, I. V., and Sagalayev, A. M. (1989). The Traditional Worldview of Turks of Southern Siberia. Humanbeing. Society [Традиционное мировоззрение тюрков Южнои Сибири. Человек. Общество]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Maddox, A. (2009). “Rhetoric as a guide to vocal timbre and sonority in Italian recitative,” in Musical Islands: Exploring Connections between Music, Place and Research, eds E. Mackinlay, B.-L. Bartleet, and K. Barney (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), 381–403.

Google Scholar

Maier, A. (2017). Population and Settlement Dynamics from the Gravettian to the Magdalenian. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft fuer Urgeschichte 26, 83–102.

Google Scholar

Malinsky-Buller, A., and Hovers, E. (2019). One size does not fit all: group size and the late middle Pleistocene prehistoric archive. J. Hum. Evol. 127, 118–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malloch, S. (2000). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Mus. Sci. 3, 29–57. doi: 10.1177/10298649000030S104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malloch, S., and Trevarthen, C. (2009). “Musicality: communicating the vitality and interests of life,” in Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship, eds S. Malloch and C. Trevarthen (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 1–11.

Google Scholar

Mamcheva, N. A. (2005). Nivkh Jew's Harps [Нивхские варганы]. Courier Sakhalin Museum 12, 271–284.

Google Scholar

Mamcheva, N. A. (2012). Musical Instruments in Nivkh Traditional Culture [Музыкальные инструменты в традиционной культуре нивхов]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: GUP Sakhalinskaya Regional Press.

Google Scholar

Martinón-Torres, M., Wu, X., de Castro, J. M. B., Xing, S., and Liu, W. (2017). Homo sapiens in the Eastern Asian Late Pleistocene. Curr. Anthropol. 58, 434–448. doi: 10.1086/694449

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maskarinec, G. G. (1995). The Rulings of the Night: An Ethnography of Nepalese Shaman Oral Texts. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Google Scholar

Maslov, A. L. (1911). Illustrated Description of Musical Instruments from Dashkovskii Ethnographic Museum in Moscow [Иллюстрированное описание музыкальных инструментов, хранящихся в Дашковском Этнографическом Музее в Москве]. Moscow: The society of connoisseurs of Natural Sciences, Anthropology and Ethnography.

Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matusky, P. (2008). “Borneo: Sabah, Sarawak, Brunei, and Kalimantan,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 406–414.

Google Scholar

Maykapar, S. (1900). Musical Hearing, its Significance, Specialty and Method of Correct Development [Музыкальный слух. Его значение, природа, особенности и метод правильного развития]. Moscow: Jurgenson [Юргенсон].

Google Scholar

Mazel, L. (1979). Structuring of Musical Works [Строение музыкальных произведении], 2nd Edn. Moscow: Muzyka [Музыка].

Google Scholar

Mazepus, V. V., and Galitskaya, S. P. (1997). Musical Culture of Siberia. Traditional Culture of Indigenous People of Siberia [Музыкальная Культура Сибири. Традиционная Культура Коренных Народов Сибири], Vol. 1. ed B. A. Shindin. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka.

Google Scholar

Mazhitov, N. A. (1981). Burial Mounds of Southern Urals VIII-XII Centuries [Курганы Южного Урала VIII-XII вв.]. Moscow: Nauka.

McAdams, S. (2019). “Timbre as a structuring force in music,” in Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition, eds K. Siedenburg, C. Saitis, S. McAdams, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Cham: Springer), 211–244. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McAdams, S., and Bertoncini, J. (1997). Organization and discrimination of repeating sound sequences by newborn infants. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 102, 2945–2953. doi: 10.1121/1.420349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGovern, J. B. M. (1922). Among the Head-Hunters of Formosa. London: T. Fischer Unwin Ltd.

Google Scholar

McLean, M. (1999). Weavers of Song: Polynesian Music and Dance. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.

Google Scholar

McPhee, C. (1955). “Children and Music in Bali,” in Childhood in Contemporary Cultures, eds M. Mead and M. Wolfenstein (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), 70–98.

Mei, J., Wang, P., Chen, K., Wang, L., Wang, Y., and Liu, Y. (2015). Archaeometallurgical studies in China: some recent developments and challenging issues. J. Archaeol. Sci. 56, 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melara, R. D., and Marks, L. E. (1990a). Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness. Percept. Psychophys. 48, 169–178. doi: 10.3758/BF03207084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melara, R. D., and Marks, L. E. (1990b). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 398–414. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Menn, L., and Vihman, M. M. (2011). “Features in child phonology,” in Where Do Phonological Features Come from? Cognitive, Physical and Developmental Bases of Distinctive Speech Categories, eds G. Nick Clements and R. Ridouane (Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing), 261–301. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.18.1.07odo

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merriam, A. P. (1964). The Anthropology of Music. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Mersenne, M. (1957). Harmonie Universelle: the Books on Instruments. Leiden: Martin Nijhoff.

Meyer, M., Kircher, M., Gansauge, M. T., Li, H., Racimo, F., Mallick, S., et al. (2012). A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338, 222–226. doi: 10.1126/science.1224344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, T., and Williams, S. (2008). “Southeast asian musics: an overview,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 4–20.

Google Scholar

Minks, A. (2002). From children's song to expressive practices: old and new directions in the ethnomusicological study of children. Ethnomusicology 46, 379–408. doi: 10.2307/852716

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, T. N. (1994). The archaeological research in the high mountains of mustang district. Ancient Nepal 136, 147–160.

Mitskevich, S. I. (1929). Menerik and Emiriacheniye. Forms of hysteria in Kolyma region [Мэнерик и эмирячение. Формы истерии в Колымском крае]. Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of USSR.

Google Scholar

Modorov, I. S., and Dvornikov, E. P. (2015). A historic essay on culture of ethnicities of Mountain Altai during the late 17th-20th centuries [Исторический очерк по культуре народов Горного Алтая в конце XVII - ХХ в.]. World Eurasia 4, 24–50.

Google Scholar

Moog, H. (1976). The Musical Experience of the Pre-school Child. London: Schott Music.

Moore, B. C. J. (2012). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 6th Edn. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Google Scholar

Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Peters, R. W. (1985). Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 77, 1853–1860. doi: 10.1121/1.391936

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Peters, R. W. (1986). Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 80, 479–483. doi: 10.1121/1.394043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Shailer, M. J. (1984). Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 75, 550–561. doi: 10.1121/1.390527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morgan, D. A. (2008). Organs and Bodies: The Jew's Harp and the Anthropology of Musical Instruments (Dissertation). The Department of Music, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. doi: 10.14288/1.0066561

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morgan, D. A. (2017). Speaking in Tongues: Music, Identity, and Representation in Jew's Harp Communities. Available at: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729603 (accessed June 13, 2018).

Google Scholar

Morley, I. (2013). The Prehistory of Music: Human Evolution, Archaeology, and the Origins of Musicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199234080.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukhina, T. K., and Lisina, M. I. (1966). “The dependency of age and individual achievements in discriimination of pitch from the type of activity iin preschool age children [Зависимость возрастных и индивидуальных показателей звуковысотного дифференцирования от характера деятельности детей в пред,” in Development of Perception in Early and Preschool Childhood [Развитие восприятия в раннем и дошкольном детстве], eds A. V. Zaporozhets and M. I. Lisina (Moscow: Prosvesheniye), 49–73.

Nadeliayev, V. M. (1960). The Project of Universal Unified Phonetic Transcription (UUPT) [Проект универсальной унифицированной фонетической транскрипции (УУФТ)]. Moscow: Nauka.

Nadeliayev, V. M. (1980). “Articulatory classification of vowels [Артикуляционная классификация гласных],” in Phonetic studies of Siberian languages [Фонетические исследования по сибирским языкам], ed V. M. Nadeliayev (Novosibirsk: Nauka), 3–91.

Nattiez, J.-J. (1976). Canada: Inuit Games and Songs. Paris: Audivis-UNESCO.

Google Scholar

Nattiez, J.-J. (1983). The rekkukara of the Ainu (Japan) and the katajjaq of the Inuit (Canada): a comparison. World Music 25, 33–44.

Google Scholar

Naumov, I. V. (2006). The History of Siberia. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203027981

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nei, M., and Graur, D. (1984). Extent of protein polymorphism and the neutral mutation theory. Evol. Biol. 17, 73–18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6974-9_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nettl, B. (2005). The Study of Ethnomusicology: Thirty-one Issues and Concepts. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Google Scholar

Nguyen, P. T. (1986). Restructuring the fixed pitches of the Vietnamese dan nguyet lute: a modification necessitated by the modal system. Asian Music 18, 56–70. doi: 10.2307/834158

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niemi, J., Lapsui, A., and Lapsui, M. M. (2004). Network of Songs: Individual Songs of the Ob'Gulf Nenets: Music and Local History as Sung by Maria Maksimovna Lapsui. Mémoires d. Helsinki: Societe Finno-Ougrienne.

Nikolsky, A. (2015). Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: prehistoric. Front. Psychol. 6:1405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikolsky, A. (2016). Evolution of tonal organization in music optimizes neural mechanisms in symbolic encoding of perceptual reality. Part-2: ancient to seventeenth century. Front. Psychol. 7:211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikolsky, A. (2017). “On the methodology of the analysis of tonal organization of Jaw Harp music [К методам анализа тоновой организации варганной музыки],” in Systemic Methods of the Research on Musical Culture, International Scientific Practical Conference in Memory of V.V. Mazepus [Системные методы изучения музыкальной культуры, Международная научно-практическая конференция памяти В.В.Мазепуса, 31/X-1/XI 2017, ed O. V. Novikova (Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka).

Nikolsky, A., Alekseyev, E. Y., Alekseev, I. Y., and Dyakonova, V. (2017). “Prolegomena of modal organization of Jaw harp music on the example of the articulatory degrees of “talking khomus” [Пролегомена ладовой организации варганной музыки на примере использования артикуляционных ступеней в “говорящем” якутском хомусе],” in Systemic Methods of the Research on Musical culture, International Scientific Practical Conference in Memory of V.V. Mazepus [Системные методы изучения музыкальной культуры, Международная научно-практическая конференция памяти В.В.Мазепуса, 31/X-1/XI 2017, ed O. V. Novikova (Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka).

Nissen, T., and Haggag, A. (1988). Parasuicidal snow-wandering in Arctic Northern Norway. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 77, 309–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb05126.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nobuhiko, C. (2008). “The music of the Ainu,” in The Ashgate Research Companion to Japanese Music, eds. A. M. Tokita and D. W. Hughes (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.), 323–344.

Google Scholar

Norman-Haignere, S., Kanwisher, N., and McDermott, J. H. (2013). Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 33, 19451–19469. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2880-13.2013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Novakovsky, S. (1924). Arctic or siberian hysteria as a reflex of the geographic environment. Ecology 5, 113–127. doi: 10.2307/1929009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Novik, Y. S. (1998). “Thing-sign” and “thing-gesture”: on semiotic interpretation of fetishism [“Вещь-знак” и “вещь-жест”: к семиотической интерпретации фетишей]. Bull. Russ. State Univers. Hum. 3, 79–97.

Novik, Y. S. (1999). “Semiotic functions of human voice in folklore and beliefs of Siberian peoples [Семиотические функции голоса в фольклоре и верованиях народов Сибири],” in Eastern Folklore and Mythology from the Comparative-Typological Aspect, eds N. Lidova and N. Nikulin (Moscow: Russian Academy of Science), 217–235.

Novik, Y. S. (2003). “Mythological representations of voice in folklore and beliefs of Siberian peoples [Мифологические представления о голосе в фольклоре и верованиях народов Сибири],” in Eurasian Space: Sound, Word, Image [Евразийское пространство: Звук, слово, образ], ed V. V. Ivanov (Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures), 134–156.

Novik, Y. S. (2004). Rite and Folklore in Siberian Shamanism: An Experiment in Correlation of Structures [Обряд и фольклор в сибирском шаманизме: Опыт сопоставления структур]. Moscow: Eastern Literature, Russian Academy of Science [Восточная литература РАН].

Google Scholar

Oakes, J. (1991). Environmental factors influencing bird-skin clothing production. Arctic Alpine Res. 23, 71–79. doi: 10.2307/1551440

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Brien, W. (2014). Prehistoric Copper Mining in Europe: 5500-500 BC. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Ogotoyev, P. P. (1988). “Problems of notation of Yakut khomus [Проблема нотации якутского хомуса],” in Musical ethnography of North Asia [Музыкальная этнография Северной Азии], ed Y. Sheikin (Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka), 150–154.

Ojamaa, T. (2002). The story of life in music: autobiographical songs of the nganasans. Folklore Electron. J. Folklore 20–22, 77–97. doi: 10.7592/FEJF2002.21.songs

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojamaa, T. (2003). “An attempt to segment a nenets melody: inside and outside view,” in Proceedings of the 5th Triennal Conference for the European Society of the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM): 5th Triennal Conference for the European Society of the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM), eds R. Kopiez, A. C. Lehmann, I. Wolther, and C. Wolf (Hanover: Hanover University of Music and Drama), 527–530.

Google Scholar

Ojamaa, T. (2005). Throat rasping: problems of visualization. World Mus. 47, 55–69. doi: 10.1080/04419057.2005.9674418

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojamaa, T., and Ross, J. (2004). “Relationship between texts and tunes in the Siberian folksongs,” in CIM04: Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology, eds R. Parncutt, A. Kessler, and F. Zimmer (Graz: Graz University), 134–135.

Ojamaa, T., and Ross, J. (2011). The perceived structure of Forest Nenets songs: a cross-cultural case study. Psychomusicol. Music Mind Brain 21, 159–175. doi: 10.1037/h0094010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okladnikov, A. P. (1968). Representation of Faces of Ancient Amur [Лики древнеrо Амура]. Novosibirsk: West Siberian Book Publishing.

Okladnikov, A. P. (1971). Petroglyphs of Lower Amur [Петроглифы Нижнего Амура]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Okladnikov, A. P. (1974). Petroglyphs of Baikal - Monuments of the Ancient Culture of Siberian Peoples [Петроглифы Байкала – памятники древней культуры народов Сибири]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Okladnikov, A. P. (1979). “Siberian archaeology at present [Сибирская археолоrия на современном этапе],” in The New in Archaeology of Siberia and Far East [Новое в археологии Сибири и Дальнего Востока], ed A. P. Pogozheva (Novosibirsk: Nauka), 5–29.

Okladnikov, A. P., and Mazin, A. I. (1976). Petroglyphs of Olyokma River and Upper Amur Region [Писаницы реки Олёкмы и Верхнего Приамурья]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Okladnikov, A. P., and Mazin, A. I. (1979). Petroglyphs of the Aldan River Valley [Писаницы бассеина реки Алдан]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Okladnikov, A. P., and Zaporozhskaya, V. D. (1972). Petroglyphs of Middle Lena [Петроглифы Средней Лены]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Oleszczak, Ł., Michalczewski, K., Borodovskii, A. P., and Pokutta, D. A. (2018). Chultukov Log 9 – A settlement from the Xiongnu-Xianbei-Rouran period in the Northern Altai. Eurasian Prehistory 14, 153–178.

Google Scholar

Pakendorf, B. (2007). Contact in the Prehistory of the Sakha (Yakuts): Linguistic and Genetic Perspectives. Available online at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/12492 (accessed July 14, 2018).

Google Scholar

Papoušek, H. (1996). “Musicality in infancy research: biological and cultural origins of early musicality,” in Musical Beginnings: Origins and Development of Musical competence, ed I. Deliège (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 37–55. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523321.003.0002

CrossRef Full Text

Papoušek, H., and Papoušek, M. (1995). “Beginning of human musicality,” in Music and the Mind Machine: The Psychophysiology and Psychopathology of the Sense of Music (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 27–34. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79327-1_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, J. S., and Gordon, R. B. (2007). Traditions and transitions in Korean bronze technology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 1991–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.01.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pashina, O. A., Vasilyeva, Y. Y., Danchenkova, N. Y., Dorokhova, Y. A., Lapina, V. A., and Matsiyevsky, I. V. (2005). Folk Musical Creativity [Народное музыкальное творчество]. Sankt-Petersburg: Kompozitor [Композитор].

Pashkovskii, O. (2012). Jew's Harps XIII–XVII centuries in archaeological finds [Дримби XIII – Початку XVII Ст. За Археологічними Знахідками]. New Res. Monum. Cossack Era Ukraine [Нові Дослідження Пам'яток Козацької Доби в Україні] 12, 248–253.

Google Scholar

Patel, A. D. (2010). Music, Language, and the Brain. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

PubMed Abstract

Pegg, C. (2001). Mongolian Music, Dance and Oral Narrative: Performing Diverse Identities. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

Google Scholar

Pekarsky, E. K. (1959). The Dictionary of Yakut Language [Словарь якутского языка]. Moscow: Academy of Science of USSR [Изд-во Академии наук СССР].

Petrov, P. A. (1960). On So-called Polar Hysteria [О так называемой полярной истерии]. The Collection of Scientific Works of the Yakut Republican Hospital.

Google Scholar

Picken, L. (1957). “The music of far eastern Asia,” in New Oxford History of Music: Ancient and Oriental Music, ed E. Wellesz (London; New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 135–189.

Pignocchi, J. L. (2002). Los Mapuche y el trompe [The Mapuche and the Trompe]. Vierundzwanzigsteljahrsschrift der International Maultrommelvirtuosengenossenschaft 10, 31–38.

Google Scholar

Pignocchi, J. L. (2004). Trompas in the Zapata Gollan Collection, Found in the Ruins of Santa Fe la Vieja, from the years 1573-1660. J. Int. Jew's Harp Soc. 2, 11–21.

Pitt, M. A. (1994). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 976–986. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.976

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plack, C. J. (2010). Musical consonance: the importance of harmonicity. Curr. Biol. 20, R476–R478. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Popov, A. I. (1949). “Data on history of Yakut religion of the former Viliui District [Материалы по истории религии якутов бывшего Вилюйского округа],” in The Anthology of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography [Сборник музея антропологии и этнографии], ed S. P. Tolstov (Moscow; Leningrad: Academy of Science of USSR [Изд-во Академии наук СССР]), 255–323.

Poss, N. F. (2012). Hmong Music and Language Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Investigation. Available at: https://oatd.org/oatd/record?record=oai%5C%3Aetd.ohiolink.edu%5C%3Aosu1332472729 (accessed March 23, 2017).

Google Scholar

Potanin, G. N. (1883). The Essays on North-Western Mongolia [Очерки Северо-Западнои Монголии]. Sankt-Petersburg: V. Kirshbaum Publishing.

Google Scholar

Potts, D. T. (2012). “Technological transfer and innovation in Ancient Eurasia,” in The Globalization of Knowledge in History, ed J. Renn (Berlin: Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge), 105–120. doi: 10.12946/rg22/052-060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Powell, A., Shennan, S., and Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324, 1298–1301. doi: 10.1126/science.1170165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prakash, B., and Tripathi, V. (1986). Iron technology in ancient India. Hist. Metall. 568–579.

Google Scholar

Pugh-Kitingan, J. (1977). Huli language and instrumental performance. Ethnomusicology 21, 205–232. doi: 10.2307/850944

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, P., and Stoneking, M. (2015). Denisovan ancestry in east Eurasian and native American populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2665–2674. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radivojević, M., Rehren, T., Pernicka, E., Šljivar, D., Brauns, M., and Borić, D. (2010). On the origins of extractive metallurgy: new evidence from Europe. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 2775–2787. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rault, L., and Brenton, J. (2000). Musical Instruments: Craftsmanship and Traditions from Prehistory to the Present. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.

Google Scholar

Reedy, C. L. (1997). Himalayan Bronzes: Technology, Style, and Choices. Newark: University of Delaware Press.

Google Scholar

Reich, D., Reinhard, J., Smith, C., Nordenfelt, S., Richards, S. M., Rohland, N., et al. (2016). Ancient mitochondrial DNA provides high-resolution time scale of the peopling of the Americas. Sci. Adv. 2:e1501385. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Relethford, J. H. (1998). Genetics of modern human origins and diversity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 27, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Repina, T. A. (1966a). “On the problem of the mechanisms of objectivitization of child's pitch distinctions [К вопросу о механизмах явления «опредмечивания» в звуковысотном различении ребенка],” in Development of Perception in Early and Preschool Childhood. [Развитие восприятия в раннем и дошкольном детстве], eds A. V Zaporozhets and M. I. Lisina (Moscow: Prosvesheniye), 98–141.

Repina, T. A. (1966b). “Perception of pitch differences in relation to organization of activitiy of preschool age children [Восприятие звуковысотных различий в зависимости от организации деятельности детей дошкольного возраста],” in Development of Perception in Early and Preschool Childhood [Развитие восприятия в раннем и дошкольном детстве], eds A. V Zaporozhets and M. I. Lisina (Moscow: Prosvesheniye), 74–97.

Réti, R. (1951). The Thematic Process in Music. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers.

Robb, J. (1993). A social prehistory of European languages. Antiquity 67, 747–760. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00063766

Robbeets, M. (2015). Diachrony of Verb Morphology: Japanese and the Transeurasian Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Roberts, B. W., Thornton, C. P., and Pigott, V. C. (2009). Development of metallurgy in Eurasia. Antiquity 83, 1012–1022. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00099312

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robertson-DeCarbo, C. E. (1974). Music as therapy: a bio-cultural problem. Ethnomusicology 18, 31. doi: 10.2307/850058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, E. (1942). Shell Fishhooks of the California Coast. Available online at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0%2C5&cites=10601864673987735240&scipsc=&q=%22Shell+fishhooks+of+the+California+coast%22&btnG= (accessed September 3, 2019).

Rogers, A. R. (1997). “Population structure and modern human origins,” in Progress in Population Genetics and Human Evolution, eds P. J. Donnelly and S. Tavare (New York, NY: Springer), 55–79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2609-1_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, A. R., and Harpending, H. (1992). Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 552–569.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rouget, G. (1985). Music and Trance: A Theory of the Relations Between Music and Possession. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar

Rubinson, K. (1992). “A reconsideration of pazyryk,” in Foundations of Empire: Archaeology and Art of the Eurasian Steppes, ed G. Seaman (Los Angeles, CA: Ethnographic Press, University of Southern California), 68–76.

Google Scholar

Russo, F. A., and Thompson, W. F. (2005). An interval size illusion: the influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 559–568. doi: 10.3758/BF03193514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rybakov, B. A. (1987). Archaeology of the USSR. Bronze Age of the Forest Zone of the USSR [Археология СССР. Эпоха бронзы лесной полосы СССР]. Moscow: Nauka.

Sachs, C. (1917). Die maultrommel. Eine typologische vorstudie. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 49, 185–200.

Google Scholar

Sachs, C. (1940). The History of Musical Instruments. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

Google Scholar

Sagalayev, A. M., and Oktiabr'skaya, I. V. (1990). Traditional Worldview of Turks of Southern Siberia. Sign and ritual. Традиционное мировоззрение тюрков Южнои Сибири. Знак и ритуал]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Saitis, C., and Weinzierl, S. (2019). “The semantics of timbre,” in Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition, eds K. Siedenburg, C. Saitis, S. McAdams, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Cham: Springer), 119–150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakaki, Y. (1903). Über das Imubacco, eine dem Jumping, Latnh und Meriachenje nahe verwandte Neurose des Ainovolkes. Neurologia 1, 7.

Sam, S.-A. (2008). “The khmer people of Cambodia,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 85–120.

Google Scholar

Sammler, D., Baird, A., Valabrègue, R., Clément, S., Dupont, S., Belin, P., et al. (2010). The relationship of lyrics and tunes in the processing of unfamiliar songs: a functional magnetic resonance adaptation study. J. Neurosci. 30, 3572–3578. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2751-09.2010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sandell, G. J. (1995). Roles for spectral centroid and other factors in determining “blended” instrument pairings in orchestration. Music Percept. Interdiscipl. J. 13, 209–246. doi: 10.2307/40285694

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sarangerel (2001). Chosen by the Spirits: Following Your Shamanic Calling. Merrimac, MA: Destiny Books.

Google Scholar

Schneider, A. (2001). Sound, pitch, and scale: from “tone measurements” to sonological analysis in ethnomusicology. Ethnomusicology 45, 489–519. doi: 10.2307/852868

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. (1940). “The residue and the mechanism of hearing,” in Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie von Wetenschappen. Available online at: https://www.boekwinkeltjes.nl/b/172949494/The_residue_and_the_mechanism_of_hearing/ (accessed December 30, 2017).

Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F., Ritsma, R. J., and Cardozo, B. L. (1962). Pitch of the residue. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 34, 1418–1424. doi: 10.1121/1.1918360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schurr, T. G. (2015). “Tracing human movements from siberia to the Americas: insights from genetic studies,” in Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas, eds M. D. Frachetti and R. N. I. Spengler (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 23–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15138-0_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwartz, D. A., Howe, C. Q., and Purves, D. (2003). The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals. J. Neurosci. 23, 7160–7168. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07160.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarzer, G. (1997). Analytic and holistic modes in the development of melody perception. Psychol. Mus. 25, 35–56. doi: 10.1177/0305735697251004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scruton, R. (1997). The Aesthetics of Music. New York, NY: Clarendon Press.

Google Scholar

Seliutina, I. Y., Urtegeshev, A. Y., Letiagin, A. Y., Shevela, A. I., Dobrinina, A. A., Esenbayeva, G. A., et al. (2012). Articulatory Databases of Indigenous Turkic Ethnoses of Southern Siberia (According to Magnetic Resonance Tomography and Digital Rentgenography) [Артикуляторные базы коренных тюркских этносов Южной Сибири (по данным МРТ и цифровой рентгенографии)]. Novosibirsk: Russian Academy of Science, Siberian Department.

Google Scholar

Sergeyeva, N. F. (1981). The Oldest Copper Metallurgy in South Eastern Siberia [Древнейшая металлургия меди юга Восточной Сибири]. Moscow: Nauka.

Sermier, C. (2002). Mongolia: Empire of the Steppes. Fyshwick: Odyssey.

Shamma, S., and Klein, D. (2000). The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 107, 2631–2644. doi: 10.1121/1.428649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shchurov, V. (1995). Khomus: Jew's Harp Music of Turkic Peoples in the Urals, Siberia, and Central Asia. Leiden: PAN Records.

Sheikin, Y. I. (1982). Problem of Genre in Musical Folklore of Udege [Проблема Жанра в Музыкальном Фольклоре Удэ] (Dissertation). The Department of Music, State Institute of Theater, Music and Cinematography. Leningrad, Russia.

Sheikin, Y. I. (1986a). “Musical instruments of Jurchen [Музыкальные инструменты чжурчженеи],” in Problems of Traditional Instrumental Music of Peoples of the USSR: Instrument-Performer-Music [Проблемы традиционной инструментальной музыки народов СССР: Инструмент-исполнитель-музыка], ed I. Matsiyevskii (Leningrad: LGITMiK), 100–109.

Google Scholar

Sheikin, Y. I. (1986b). “Musical instruments of Ude: etimology, construction, playing patterns [Музыкальные инструменты удэ: этимология, конструкции, наигрыши],” in Musical creativity of the peoples of Siberia and Far East [Музыкальное творчество народов Сибири и Дальнего Востока], ed I. I. Golovneva (Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka), 38–72.

Sheikin, Y. I. (1990). Instrumental Music of Yugra [Инструментальная музыка Югры]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after Glinka.

Sheikin, Y. I. (1996). Musical Culture of Peoples of Northern Asia [Музыкальная культура народов Северной Азии]. Yakutsk: Yakutskii Scientific Center.

Sheikin, Y. I. (2002). History of Music Culture of Siberian Ethnicities: A Comparative Historic Investigation [История музыкальной культуры народов Сибири: сравнительно-историческоеисследование]. Moscow: Eastern Literature, Russian Academy of Science Восточная литература РАН].

Sheikin, Y. I. (2018). Musical Culture of Chukchi [Музыкальная культура чукчей], eds O. Dobzhanskaya and T. Ignatyeva Novosibirsk. Russia: Nauka.

Shennan, S. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: a model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeol. J. 11, 5–16. doi: 10.1017/S0959774301000014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sherry, S. T., Rogers, A. R., Harpending, H., Soodyall, H., Jenkins, T., and Stoneking, M. (1994). Mismatch distributions of mtDNA reveal recent human population expansions. Hum. Biol. 66, 761–755.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shimkevich, P. P. (1896). Materials for the Study of Shamanism Amongst Goldi [Материалы для изучения шаманства у гольдов], ed M. Y. Sibirtsev. Khabarovsk: The Notes of the Imperial Russian Geogrphic Society, Priamurye Department.

Google Scholar

Shimomura, I. (2016). “Acoustic mechanism of sound generation of the “talking Jaw harp” and of the game of “larynx substitution”. [Акустический механизм звукоизвлечения из «говорящего» варгана и из игры «замена горлом»],” in Folklore of Paleoasiatic Peoples: Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference [Фольклор палеоазиатских народов: материалы II Международной научной конференции, г. Якутск, 21–25 ноября 2016 г.] ed A. N. Alekseyev (Yakutsk: RIO Media Holding), 216–221.

Shinohara, K., and Kawahara, S. (2010). A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: the images of size. Annu. Meet. Berkeley Linguist. Soc. 36, 396. doi: 10.3765/bls.v36i1.3926

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirokogoroff, S. M. (1929). Phychomental Complex of the Northern Tungus. Shanghai: Garland Pub.

Shishigin, S. S. (1995). Play Khomus [Играйте на хомусе]. Yakutsk: Ministry of Culture of Sakha Republic.

Google Scholar

Shishigin, S. S. (2015). Learn to Play Khomus [Хомус тарда үөрэниҥ]. Yakutsk: RIO Media Holding.

Shreibler, S. I. (1927). The Preliminary Report of the Medical Sanitary Team of the Yakut Expedition of the Academy of Science of the USSR 1925-26 on the inspection of the Viliui and Olekma districts [Предварительный отчёт медико-санитарного Отряда Якутской Экспедиции Академии На.]. Leningrad: Academy of Science of USSR.

Shrenk, L. I. (1903). On Aliens of the Amur Region. Ethnographic Section 2: Main Traits of Family, Social and Personal Life [Об инородцах Амурского края. Этнографическая часть. Вторая половина. Основные черты семейной, общественной и внутренней жизни]. Sankt-Petersburg: The Imperial Academy of Science of Russia.

Shternberg, L. Y. (1936). Prehistoric Religion in Light of Ethnography: Research, Articles, Lectures [Первобытная религия в свете этнографии: исследования, статьи, лекции]. Leningrad: Institute of Peoples of the North at the Central Executive Committee of the USSR).

Shulga, P. I. (2015). The Yuhuangmiao Cemetery in Northern China (the 7th – 6th centuries B.C.) [Могильник Юйхуанмяо в Северном Китае (VII-VI века до нашей эры)]. Novosibirsk: Publishing department of the institute of archaeology and ethnography, Russian Academy of Science.

Sidéra, I. (2011). Fabriquer des cuillers en os: L'exemple de Kovacevo. Stud. Praehistor. 14, 55–62.

Sieroszewski, W. (1896). The Yakuts. An Ethnographic Study [Якуты. Опыт этнографического исследования]. Sankt-Petersburg: The Imperial Geographic Society Publishing.

Sikora, M., Pitulko, V. V., Sousa, V. C., Allentoft, M. E., Vinner, L., Rasmussen, S., et al. (2019). The population history of northeastern Siberia since the Pleistocene. Nature 570, 182–188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1279-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simana, S., and Preisig, E. (2003). “Kmhmu' Music and Musical Instruments,” in Laosand Ethnic Minority Cultures: Promoting Heritage, ed Y. Goudineau (Paris: UNESCO Publishing), 123–132.

Simons, G. (1986). Early childhood musical development: a survey of selected research. Bull. Council Res. Mus. Educ. 86, 36–52.

Google Scholar

Simukhin, A. I. (2006). Technological traditions in production of nonferrous metallic artifacts in transbaikalia [Технологические Традиции в Производстве Изделий Из Цветного Металла в Забайкалье] (Dissertation). State Buryat University, Russian Academy of Science, Ulan-Ude, Russia, The Department of Ethnography, Ethnology and Anthropology.

Singh, P. G., and Hirsh, I. J. (1992). Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 92, 2650–2661. doi: 10.1121/1.404381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skrebkova-Filatova, M. S. (1985). Texture in Music [Фактура в музыке]. Moscow: Muzyka [Музыка].

Slobin, M. (1976). Music in the Culture of Northern Afghanistan. Viking Fun. Tucson, AZ: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.

Google Scholar

Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

Google Scholar

Soares, P., Alshamali, F., Pereira, J. B., Fernandes, V., Silva, N. M., Afonso, C., et al. (2012). The Expansion of mtDNA Haplogroup L3 within and out of Africa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 915–927. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Solomonova, N. V. (2000). Musical culture of peoples of the Russian Far East of the 19th–20th centuries: Thnomusicological Essays [Музыкальная Культура Народов Дальнего Востока России XIX-XX Вв. (Этномузыкологические Очерки)] (Dissertation). The Department of Music Theory, The Moscow State Conservatory named after Tchaikovsky.

Starostin, S. A. (1991). The Altaic Problem and Origins of Japanese Language [Алтаиская проблема и происхождение японского языка]. Moscow: Nauka.

Google Scholar

Startsev, A. F. (2017). Ethnic Beliefs of Tungus-Manchurians Regarding Nature and Society [Этнические представления тунгусо-маньчжуров о природе и обществе]. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.

Stépanoff, C., Marchina, C., Fossier, C., and Bureau, N. (2017). Animal autonomy and intermittent coexistences: north Asian modes of herding. Curr. Anthropol. 58, 57–81. doi: 10.1086/690120

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stige, B. (2002). Culture-Centered Music Therapy. Barcelona: Barcelona Publishers.

Google Scholar

Stockmann, E. (1987). “Researching European folk musical instruments and describing them in a multivolume reference book [Исследование народных музыкальных инструментов Европы и их описание в многотомном справочнике (Handbuch)],” in Folk Musical Instruments and Instrumental Music [Народные музыкальные инструменты и инструментальная музыка], ed I. V. Matsiyevskii (Moscow: Soviet Composer [Советский композитор]), 39–56.

Stoter, F.-R., Schoeffler, M., Edler, B., and Herre, J. (2013). Human ability of counting the number of instruments in polyphonic music. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 133, 3366–3366. doi: 10.1121/1.4805760

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Subbotina, A. (2008). Monuments of early iron age of Chundo type in Korean Peninsula [Памятники Раннего Железного Века Типа Чундо На Корейском Полуострове] (Dissertation). The Department of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Science, Siberian Section, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Suleimanova, R. N. (1994). “The remnants of shamanism amongst Bashkirs [Пережитки шаманства у башкир],” in The Ethnological Research in Bashkortostan [Этнологические исследования в Башкортостане], eds I. Gabdrafikov, M. D. Kiyekbayev, and F. A. Shakurova (Ufa: Russian Academy of Science), 119–130.

Sunchugashev, Y. I. (1975). The Oldest Mines and Monuments of Early Metallurgy in Khakass-Minusinsk Basin [Древнейшие рудники и памятники ранней металлургии в Хакасско- Минусинской котловине]. Moscow: Nauka.

Sundberg, J. (1974). Articulatory interpretation of the “singing formant.” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 55, 838–844. doi: 10.1121/1.1914609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sundberg, J. (1987). The Science of the Singing Voice. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

Google Scholar

Suzukei, V. (1989). Tuvan Traditional Musical Instruments [Тувинские традиционные музыкальные инструменты]. Kyzyl: Tuvan Book Publishing [Тувинское книжное издательство].

Suzukei, V. (1991). “The typology of Tuvan khomuses [Типология тувинских хомусов],” in Jew's Harp (khomus) and Its Music. Proceedings of the First All-Union conference, 1988 [Варган (хомус) и его музыка. Материалы I Всесоюзной конференции 1988], ed E. Y. Alekseyev (Yakutsk: Yakut Institute of language, literature and history of the USSR Academy of Science), 59–67.

Suzukei, V. (2006). The Configuration of the Development of Tuvan Musical Culture: Dynamics of the Axiological Aspect [Конфигурация развития музыкальной культуры Тувы: динамика аксиологического аспекта]. Kemerovo: Kemerovo University of Culture and Arts.

Suzukei, V. (2010). Khomus in the traditional culture of the Tuvans [Хомус в традиционнои культуре тувинцев]. Kyzyl: Tyvapoligraf.

Svantesson, J. O. (2017). Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 8:e01441. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tadagawa, L. (1991). On Japanese Jaw Harps of the millenial age [О японских варганах тысячелетней давности]. Khomus 1, 24–47.

Tadagawa, L. (2001). Mukkuri Hawehe: Sound of Mukkuri. Jew's Harp and Vocal Music of the Ainu. Saitama: Nihon Koukin Kyoukai.

Tadagawa, L. (2007). Asian excavated Jew's harps: a checklist. J. Int. Jews Harp Soc. 4, 5–11.

Tadagawa, L. (2016). Asian excavated Jew's Harps: a checklist (1) - lamellate Jew's harps (1). Instit. Ethnomusicol. Bull. Tokyo Coll. Mus. 5, 57–70.

Tadagawa, L. (2017a). Asian excavated Jew's Harps: a checklist (2) - lamellate jew's harps (2). Instit. Ethnomusicol. Bull. Tokyo Coll. Mus. 6, 57–68.

Tadagawa, L. (2017b). The khomus is my red deer on which I fly through the middle world (Khomus in the shamanic practice of Tuva: Research issues). New Res. Tuva 2, 165–176. doi: 10.25178/nit.2017.2.7

CrossRef Full Text

Tadysheva, N. O. (2016). Traditional etiquette of Altaians in the aspect of family relations [Традиционный этикет алтайцев в семейно-родственном аспекте]. Tomsk J. Linguist. Anthropol. Res. 2, 98–105.

Google Scholar

Tadysheva, N. O. (2018). The reflection of tree cult in traditional beliefs of Sayano-Altaic Turks [Отражение культа дерева в традиционном мировоззрении тюрков Саяно-Алтая]. Tomsk State Univers. J. History 51, 118–123. doi: 10.17223/19988613/51/17

CrossRef Full Text

Tallavaara, M., Eronen, J. T., and Luoto, M. (2018). Productivity, biodiversity, and pathogens influence the global hunter-gatherer population density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1232–1237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715638115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tarasov, P. E., Kvavadze, E. V., Webb, T., Dorofeyuk, N. I., Bykova, G. V., Volkova, V. S., et al. (2000). Last glacial maximum biomes reconstructed from pollen and plant macrofossil data from northern Eurasia. J. Biogeogr. 27, 609–620. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00429.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tardieu, D., and McAdams, S. (2012). Perception of dyads of impulsive and sustained instrument sounds. Music Percept. Interdiscipl. J. 30, 117–128. doi: 10.1525/mp.2012.30.2.117

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tchakhov, A. I. (2012). Ancient Yakut Musical Instruments: The Manufacturing Technology [Старинные якутские музыкальные инструменты: технология изготовления]. Yakutsk: Alaas.

Tchernetsov, V. N. (1971). Rock Images of Ural [Наскальные изображения Урала]. Moscow: Nauka.

Tchernetsov, V. N. (1987). Sources on Ethnography of Western Siberia [Источники по этнографии Западной Сибири]. Tomsk: The State Tomsk University.

Google Scholar

Tenishev, E. R. (1984). Comparative Historic Grammar of Turkic Languages. Phonetics [Сравнительно-историческая грамматика тюркских языков]. Moscow: Nauka.

Tenishev, E. R. (1997). “Altaic languages [Алтайские языки],” in Languages of the World. Turkic Languages [Языки мира: Тюркские языки] (Bishkek: Russian Academy of Science, Kyrkyzstan), 7–16.

Teplov, B. (1947). The Psychology of Musical Abilities [Психология музыкальных способностей]. Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Russia.

Terhardt, E. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 55, 1061–1069. doi: 10.1121/1.1914648

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., and Seewann, M. (1982). Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 71, 679–688. doi: 10.1121/1.387544

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thiel, B. (1989). Excavations at musang cave, Northeast Luzon, Philippines. Asian Perspect. 28, 61–81.

Google Scholar

Titze, I. R. (1988). A framework for the study of vocal registers. J. Voice 2, 183–194. doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80075-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tokarsky, A. A. (1893). Meriachenye and the Disease of Convulsive Contractions [Меряченье и болезнь судорожных подергиваний]. Moscow: Vrach.

Tompkins, D. (2010). How to Wreck a Nice Beach : the Vocoder from World War II to Hip-Hop : The Machine Speaks. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.

Trainor, L. J., Wu, L., and Tsang, C. D. (2004). Long-term memory for music: infants remember tempo and timbre. Dev. Sci. 7, 289–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00348.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trehub, S. E., Endman, M. W., and Thorpe, L. A. (1990). Infants' perception of timbre: classification of complex tones by spectral structure. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 49, 300–313. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90060-L

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Treitler, L. (2007). “‘Centonate' chant: übles flickwerk or e pluribus unus?” in With Voice and Pen, ed L. Treitler (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 186–201. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214761.003.0007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (2008). The musical art of infant conversation: narrating in the time of sympathetic experience, without rational interpretation, before words. Mus. Sci. 12, 15–46. doi: 10.1177/1029864908012001021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trias, S. (2010). Helmholtz and Coupled Resonators Acoustics in Jew's Harp Playing (Dissertation). Faculty of Arts, Telemark University College, Notodden, Norway.

Tripathi, V. (2018). Metals and metallurgy in the harappan civilization. Indian J. History Sci. 53, 279–295. doi: 10.16943/ijhs/2018/v53i3/49460

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tseng, W.-S. (2003). Clinician's Guide to Cultural Psychiatry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Google Scholar

Tseng, W.-S. (2007). “Culture and psychopathology: general view,” in Textbook of Cultural Psychiatry, eds D. Bhugra and K. Bhui (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 95–112. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511543609.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turbat, T. (2017). “Archaeological Jew's Harps from Ancient Nomadic Cultures of Eastern Eurasia [Евразийн зүүн хэсгийн эртний нүүдэлчдийн археологийн дурсгалаас илэрсэн хэл хуурууд],” in Archaeological Survey, ed T. Turbat (Ulaanbaatar: Academic Council of the Institute of History and Archeology of the Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism), 169–180.

Tylecote, R. F. (2002). A History of Metallurgy. London: Maney Pub., for the Institute of Materials.

Google Scholar

Tyukhteneva, S. P. (2015). Personality and society amongst Altaians: from clan affiliation to all-Altaic identity [Личность и общество у алтаицев: от родовои принадлежности до общеалтаискои идентичности]. Bull. Kalmyk Instit. Humanitarian Stud. Russ. Acad. Sci. 4, 72–81.

Uchida, R., and Catlin, A. (2008). “Music of upland minorities in Burma, Laos, and Thailand,” in The Garland Handbook of Southeast Asian Music, eds T. Miller and S. Williams (London: Routledge), 303–316.

Google Scholar

Ukhtomsky, A. A. (1978). Selected Works [Избранные труды]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Vainshtein, S. (1991). The World of Nomads of the Center of Asia [Мир кочевников центра Азии]. Moscow: Nauka.

Val'kova, V. B. (1992). Musical Thematicism, Cognition, Culture [Музыкальный тематизм, мышление, культура]. Nizhnii Novgorod: State Nizhegorodskii University.

van der Schyff, D. (2013). Music, culture and the evolution of the human mind: looking beyond dichotomies. Hellenic J. Mus. Educ. Cult. 4, 1–11.

Google Scholar

Vasilevich, G. M. (1969). Evenki: The Historic-Ethnographic Sketches (18th-Beginning of 20th Centuries) [Эвенки: историко-этнографические очерки (XVIII-начало XX в.)]. Leningrad: Nauka, The Institute of Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Science.

Vasilyev, V. Y. (2016). Genesis of shamanic instruments of Sakha people in light of the image of Mother-Beast of Turks, Mongols and Tungus [Генезис шаманских инструментов народа саха в свете образа матери-зверя у тюрков, монголов и тунгусов]. Northeastern Humanitarian Bull. 4, 18–27.

Vensten-Tagrina, Z. V. (2008). The Phenomenon of Personal Song in Traditional Culture of Chukcha [Феномен личной песни в традиционной культуре чукчей] (Dissertation). Department of Ethnoculturology, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia.

Google Scholar

Verbitsky, V. I. (1865). Seoks (bone, kin, generation) of Altaians [Сеоки (кость, род, поколение) алтайцев]. Tomsk Provincial Gazette 42, 14.

Vernot, B., Tucci, S., Kelso, J., Schraiber, J. G., Wolf, A. B., Gittelman, R. M., et al. (2016). Excavating neandertal and denisovan DNA from the genomes of melanesian individuals. Science 352, 235–239. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vertkov, K., Blagodatov, G., and Yazovitskaya, E. (1963). The Atlas of Musical Instruments of the USSR Peoples [Атлас музыкальных инструментов народов СССР]. Moscow: Muzgiz.

Vinogradov, V. S. (1938). The Music of Soviet Kyrghistan [Музыка Советской Киргизии]. Moscow: The Department of Art Management at the Government of Kyrghyz Republic.

Vinogradov, V. S. (1958). Kirghiz Folk Music [Киргизская народная музыка]. Frunze: Kirghizgosizdat [Kirghiz State Publishing].

Vitashevsky, N. A. (1911). From the field of prehistoric psycho-neurosis [Из области первобытного психоневроза]. Ethnogr. Rev. 1–2, 180–228.

Voldina, T. V. (2017). “Song as a curative remedy in traditional culture of Yugric people of Ob' [Песня как целительное средство в традиционнои культуре обских угров],” in Medical Ethnography: Contemporary Approaches and Conceptions [Медицинская этнография: современные подходы и концепции], ed V. I. Kharitonova (Moscow: Institute of Ethnography & Anthropology of Russian Academy of Science, OOO Publicity), 141–151.

Walker, R. (1997). Visual metaphors as music notation for sung vowel spectra in different cultures. J. N. Music Res. 26, 315–345. doi: 10.1080/09298219708570733

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wallace, A. F. C., and Ackerman, R. E. (1960). An interdisciplinary approach to mental disorder among the polar eskimos of northwest Greenland. Anthropologica 2:249. doi: 10.2307/25604472

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, X. (2011). Early Development of Bronze Metallurgy in Eastern Eurasia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

Warrier, C. M., and Zatorre, R. J. (2002). Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 198–207. doi: 10.3758/BF03195786

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Welch, G. F. (1994). The assessment of singing. Psychol. Mus. 22, 3–19. doi: 10.1177/0305735694221001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, J. C., and Hamilton, E. G. (2009). The transmission of early bronze technology to thailand: new perspectives. J. World Prehistory 22, 357–397. doi: 10.1007/s10963-009-9029-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whitridge, P. (2015). The sound of contact: Historic Inuit music-making in northern Labrador. N. Atlantic Archaeol. 4, 17–42.

Google Scholar

Williams, D. B. (1990). Effects of selected music factors on second- and fifth-grade children's perception of melodic motion. Psychomusicol. J. Res. Music Cogn. 9, 59–78. doi: 10.1037/h0094158

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, J. (2001). “Jew's harp,” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, eds S. Sadie and J. Tyrrell (London: Macmillan Publishers). doi: 10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.14300

CrossRef Full Text

Wright, M. (2004). The search for the origins of the Jew's harp. Silk Road 2, 49–55.

Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2011). The Jew's Harp Trade in Colonial America. Galpin Soc. J. 64, 209–218. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23209396

Wright, M. (2015). The Jews-Harp in Britain and Ireland. Abingdon; Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Wright, M., and Impey, A. (2007). The Birmingham-KwaZulu connection. J. Int. Jews Harp Soc. 4, 44–48. doi: 10.1556/SMus.48.2007.3-4.3

CrossRef Full Text

Yakovlev, V. I. (2001). Traditional musical instruments of Volgo-Uralic PEoples: Formation, development and functionality [Традиционные Музыкальные Инструменты Народов Волго-Уралья: Формирование, Развитие и Функционирование] (Dissertation). The Department of Ethnography, Ethnology and Anthropology, The State Kazan University, Kazan, Russia.

Yanin, V. L. (2006). Archaeology [Археология]. Moscow: The Moscow State University.

Yekeyeva, E. V. (2011). Traditions of family upbringing amongst Altaians [Традиции семейного воспитания у алтайцев]. Courier North-Eastern Fed. Univ. 8, 103–106.

Google Scholar

Yekeyeva, E. V. (2014). “The system of family upbringing [Система семеибного воспитания],” in The Altaians: Ethnic History. Traditional Culture. Modern Development, ed N. V. Yekeyev (Gorno-Altaisk: The scientific research institute of Altaistics named after Surazakov), 130–148.

Yenchinov, E. V. (2009). Family values of Altaians: Transformation of customary law in modern culture [Семейные Ценности Алтайцев: Трансформация Обычного Права в Современной Культуре] (Dissertation). Moscow State University named after Lomonosov, The Department of Theory and History of Culture.

Yesipova, M. V. (2008).“Phono-instruments (etnophones),” in Musical Instruments [Музыкальные Инструменты], Vol. 633 ed M. V. Yesipova (Moscow: Deka-VS).

Yesipova, M. V., Wright, J., Sheikin, Y. I, Gerasimov, O. M., Gorokhovik, E. M., Putilov, B. N., et al. (2008). “Jew's harp [Варган],” in Musical Instruments [Музыкальные Инструменты], ed M. B. Yesipova (Moscow: Deka-VS), 112–115.

Yousof, G.-S. (2004). The Encyclopedia of Malaysia: Performing Arts. Brooklyn, NY: Archipelago Press.

Zabolotskaya, P. Y. (2009). Folkloric Theater of Yakuts: An Attempt of Historic-Hystrionic Research [Шаманские маски народов Сибири)]. Ulan-Ude: East Siberian State Academy of Culture and Arts.

Google Scholar

Zabolotskaya, P. Y. (2011). Shamanic masks of Siberian peoples [Шаманские маски народов Сибири]. Siberian Philol. J. 3, 24–34. doi: 10.17223/18137083/36/3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zagretdinov, R. A. (1997). The School of Playing Kubyz: A Practical Methodological Aid [Школа игры на кубызе: Учебно-Методическое Пособие]. Ufa: Belaya Reka.

Zamoruyev, V. (2004). Quaternary glaciation of north-eastern Asia. Dev. Q. Sci. 2, 321–323. doi: 10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80137-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zaporozhets, A. V. (1985). Selected Works on Psychology [Избранные Психологические Труды], Vol. 1, eds V. V. Davydova and V. P. Zinchenko. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Zaporozhets, A. V. (2003). The development of sensations and perceptions in early and preschool childhood. J. Russ. East Eur. Psychol. 40, 22–34. doi: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405400322

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zarate, J. M., Ritson, C. R., and Poeppel, D. (2013). The effect of instrumental timbre on interval discrimination. PLoS ONE 8:e75410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zemtsovsky, I. (1987). “Musical instrument and musical cognition (on presentation of a problem) [Музыкальный инструмент и музыкальное мышление (к постановке вопроса)],” in Folk Musical Instruments and Instrumental Music [Народные музыкальные инструменты и инструментальная музыка], ed I. V. Matsiyevskii (Moscow: Soviet Composer [Советский композитор]), 125–131.

Zhilich, S., Rudaya, N., Krivonogov, S., Nazarova, L., and Pozdnyakov, D. (2017). Environmental dynamics of the Baraba forest-steppe (Siberia) over the last 8000 years and their impact on the types of economic life of the population. Q. Sci. Rev. 163, 152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.03.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhirkova, R. R. (1991). The Methodic Supplement for Learning to Play Khomus [Методическое пособие для разучивания игры на хомусе]. Yakutsk: Yakutsk University.

Zhuravlev, A. P. (1977). Eneolithic Karelia [Энеолит Карелии] (Dissertation). The Department of Archaeology, The Institute of Language, Literature and History of Karelian chapter of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia.

Zsiga, E. C. (2013). The Sounds of Language: an Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Google Scholar

Keywords: timbre-based music, personal song, Jaw harp (aka Jew's harp), musicality, arctic hysteria, music evolution, thematicism, musical texture

Citation: Nikolsky A, Alekseyev E, Alekseev I and Dyakonova V (2020) The Overlooked Tradition of “Personal Music” and Its Place in the Evolution of Music. Front. Psychol. 10:3051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03051

Received: 28 June 2019; Accepted: 24 December 2019;
Published: 18 February 2020.

Edited by:

Margarita L. Mazo, The Ohio State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Jaan Ross, Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre, Estonia
Theodore Levin, Dartmouth College, United States

Copyright © 2020 Nikolsky, Alekseyev, Alekseev and Dyakonova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aleksey Nikolsky, aleksey@braavo.org

Download