“We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.”
Aristotle
Introduction
Improving one's performance is a persistent desire for many individuals. Performance is often used as an umbrella term to describe the behavior and activities of individuals or larger entities, such as organizations, and could ultimately be linked to evolutionary success (Buss, 2019). Specifically, we define performance as how effectively an action is executed and how successful behavior is to achieve a goal [based on (McGarry, 2013; Raab et al., 2015)].
One common tip to improve performance is developing habits. Various definitions of habits coexist in the literature, and in this paper we consider habits as processes “by which a stimulus generates an impulse to act as a result of a learned stimulus–response association” [(Gardner, 2015), p. 277]. Habits are driven by automatic processes in that they do not require conscious and intentional processing of related information (Graybiel, 2008; Lally and Gardner, 2013). Habits should be distinguished from routines, which can be viewed as organized activities with purpose, direction, sequence, outcomes, and repetition, but which are not necessarily based on a learned stimulus–response association (Clark, 2000; Charmaz, 2002; Gardner, 2015). Rituals are often used as a synonym for routines; however routines are seen as being rather mostly instrumental to reach a goal, while rituals encompass a symbolic meaning in a specific group context (Fiese et al., 2002). Habitual behavior can be distinguished in terms of habitual instigation—habitually “deciding” to do something—and habitual execution—habitually “doing” something (Gardner et al., 2016, 2020). Regarding habit formation, Lally and Gardner (2013) identified four basic stages: First, a decision must be made to take action. Second, the decision to act must be translated into action. Third, the behavior must be repeated, and finally, the new action must be repeated in a way that leads to automaticity.
The notion that habits can lead to performance optimization is widespread. In fact, a search for “performance habits” returns more than 500 million hits on Google (with mostly business websites, such as Forbes, “10 Daily Habits of the Most Productive Leaders”1). More than 3,000 books are available on Amazon, with some bestsellers such as “High Performance Habits: How Extraordinary People Become That Way” (Burchard, 2017) or “Tools of Titans: the Tactics, Routines, and Habits of Billionaires, Icons, and World-Class Performers” (Ferriss, 2017). The majority of non-scientific “expert” recommendations on habits to improve performance originate from those who have reached an elite level in a specific domain (e.g., business, sports, music, politics, etc.) or a certain social status. Subsequently they then present those habits as key influential factors for their success (Burchard, 2017; Ferriss, 2017). However, beyond those anecdotal reports and popular interest, to date very few scientific researchers investigated the effectiveness of habits to improve one's performance. So far, the main themes in habit research in human focuses on the formation of health habits (Lally and Gardner, 2013; Gardner, 2015), which is of course of utmost individual and societal importance. Habit research in the field of human performance however is sparse—with some exceptions regarding academic, cognitive, and athletic performance (Cotrena et al., 2016; Dubuc et al., 2019; Longo et al., 2019; Fiorella, 2020; Kristo et al., 2020)—and we aim in this opinion piece to outline a range of dimensions which could benefit from the conceptualization of habits for optimizing performance.
Performance Habits
We refer to performance habits as habits targeting performance optimization, considering performance as defined above. The theoretical characteristics of habits make them very relevant for performance (Gardner, 2015; Wood, 2017). Indeed paying attention to the numerous factors influencing performance can be quite effortful and cognitively demanding (Raab et al., 2015). Habits, reflecting actions relying on automatic functioning, free up resources for further top-down processing (Graybiel, 2008; Lally and Gardner, 2013) and reduce motivational impairments (Stojanovic et al., 2020). At this point, we should distinguish between habits and the automatic processes driving skill automaticity observed in expert performance, given in this case that the automatic processes are not necessarily the result of a learned stimulus–response association but rather the result of an extensive learning/training phase that automatized skills via a modification in brain activation patterns (Baker and Young, 2014; Yang, 2015). Nonetheless, habits can provide a basis to optimize learning/training in facilitating its instigation and execution (Gardner et al., 2016, 2020), ultimately facilitating skill automatization. In a nutshell, habits can be seen as a tool to help in transferring human behavior driven by conscious processes to human behavior driven by unconscious processes, therefore optimizing resources and performance. Altogether these characteristics make habits an important mechanism through which people can self-regulate and achieve long-term goals (Wood, 2017). Consequently, people willing to achieve performance goals would benefit from integrating performance habits to their preparation in order to optimize it.
In the following discussion, we introduce a list of dimensions related to activities that have been linked to performance improvement and that could also form into performance habits. To establish this list of dimensions representing the basis of the performance habits framework, general principles for mapping reviews were followed (Miake-Lye et al., 2016). Mapping reviews are particularly useful when there is a large diversity of research as a first step to a systematic review and to identify gaps within an area (Cooper, 2016; Perryman, 2016). The database search2 was directed to identify meta-analyses and reviews concerning factors influencing human performance, with the aim to derive higher-order dimensions of strategies improving performance that can be turned into habits.
Eight main dimensions emerged from the visual map of the mapping review. First, we find the classical three dimensions identified by neuroscience to underpin performance (Briguglio et al., 2020): eat (i.e., dietary behaviors), move (i.e., exercise), and sleep. Furthermore, we outline five additional dimensions: psychological well-being, as well as strategies to foster learning, productivity, executive function, and creativity. Those eight dimensions are summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Performance Habit Dimensions
Dietary Behavior
Dietary behaviors have a high impact on performance, from academic performance at school to athletes' performance (Burke et al., 2004; Rampersaud et al., 2005). Dietary behavior habits can be related to overall diet, such as the Mediterranean (Soltani et al., 2019), vegetarian (Craddock et al., 2019; Viguiliouk et al., 2019), vegan (Lopez et al., 2019), or gluten-free (Taetzsch et al., 2018) diet. Dietary behavior habits may also be related to supplementation (Van De Walle and Vukovich, 2018; Clifford et al., 2019; Wilson-Barnes et al., 2020) or to having no meal at all, for example, skipping breakfast (Rampersaud et al., 2005), or with intermittent fasting (Aird et al., 2018; Cho et al., 2019).
Exercise
Regular exercise sustains performance in many domains and across the lifespan (Heyn et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2012; Álvarez-Bueno et al., 2020). It is now widely acknowledged that exercise benefits from the conceptualization of habits (Hagger, 2019, 2020; Gardner et al., 2020; Phillips, 2020). Regarding performance, the type of exercise (e.g., aerobic, resistance, high-intensity interval training, stretching) should be considered according to the performance outputs expected (Wen et al., 2019; Lee and Stone, 2020; Martland et al., 2020; Wilke et al., 2020).
Sleep
Sleep is essential for performance, given that partial or chronic sleep deprivation may affect performance in many domains (Pilcher and Huffcutt, 1996; Dewald et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2020). The usefulness of habits for sleep interventions has been showcased by Rebar et al. (2020). Sleep-based interventions have been shown to be effective in triggering positive sleep habits (Dewald et al., 2010; Chung et al., 2017; Bonnar et al., 2018; Friedrich and Schlarb, 2018). Among the sleep habits promoted by sleep-based interventions, we find, for example, bedtime routines involving decreasing smartphone use (Shin et al., 2017), using relaxation methods (Laborde et al., 2019), or writing to-do lists (Scullin et al., 2018).
Psychological Well-Being
Psychological well-being (Ryff and Singer, 1996; Ryan and Deci, 2001; Boehm and Kubzansky, 2012) has been shown to positively influence academic performance (Amholt et al., 2020), work performance (Parker et al., 2003; Ford et al., 2011), and sport performance (Lundqvist, 2011). Among the interventions that have been used to promote psychological well-being (Bolier et al., 2013; Ryff, 2014), several methods could be turned into habits to improve performance, such as meditation (Tang, 2014; Chan et al., 2019), progressive muscle relaxation and autogenic training (Manzoni et al., 2008), slow-paced breathing (Zaccaro et al., 2018), journaling (Hensley and Munn, 2020), nature exposure (Kaplan and Berman, 2010), or expressing gratitude (Wood et al., 2010).
Strategies to Foster Learning
Beyond the mere amount of practice/time spent to learn, the characteristics of learning (e.g., new material, new skill) are very likely to impact subsequent performance in many domains like in academia (Dunlosky et al., 2013), work (Salas and Cannon-Bowers, 2001), and sport (Macnamara et al., 2016). If the habits to learn will depend on the specific learning object, some recommendations can be made at a meta-level, such as developing habits regarding (1) learning techniques, for example, massed vs. distributed learning (Cepeda et al., 2006), (2), learning environment (Dunlosky et al., 2013), considering both the physical (e.g., library vs. at home) and the social aspects (e.g., with a teacher, with peers, alone), and finally (3) learning material, such as books, podcasts, videos, Smartphone apps, etc. (Koçak et al., 2016; Delgado et al., 2018).
Strategies to Foster Productivity
Productivity refers to the optimization of personal workflow and effectiveness (Fosse et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2019). It is recommended that individuals develop a personal workflow management system (Lackey et al., 2014), with habits underlying productivity, such as distraction minimization (Lewis et al., 2019) and time management interventions (Fosse et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2019). Distraction minimization (Lewis et al., 2019) would involve, for example, developing habits to effectively handle phone calls, emails, or any internet-based/social network distractions. Time optimization (Fosse et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2019) is achieved through the programming of short breaks, with efficient note reporting and classification techniques (Lewis et al., 2019), and with using speed-reading techniques (Rayner et al., 2016).
Strategies to Foster Executive Functioning
Regardless of the performance domain considered, performance to reach a goal will rely on executive functioning, the part of cognitive functioning that allows us to perform goal-directed behavior (Diamond, 2013). Cognitive training programs have been developed to target individuals across the lifespan and have been shown to be effective from pre-schoolers (Scionti et al., 2019) to older adults (Lampit et al., 2014). The extent to which executive functions can be trained or the cognitive training modality of performance would transfer to other domains of performance is still debated (Jak et al., 2013; Simons et al., 2016); most of the research show that improvements are related to the cognitive task or domain-trained (Melby-Lervåg and Hulme, 2013; Butler et al., 2018). Therefore, determining the most relevant executive functions for the performance domain would determine the type of habit developed.
Strategies to Foster Creativity
In some domains, performance would be related to doing something novel, to synthesize and combine in a new way existing information, thus requiring creativity, also referred to as divergent thinking (Dietrich and Kanso, 2010; Raab et al., 2015). Creativity training focuses on the development of cognitive skills and the heuristics involved in skill application and should use realistic exercises appropriate to the domain at hand (Scott et al., 2004; Valgeirsdottir and Onarheim, 2017). Social interactions should be encouraged to allow brainstorming with other people (Al-Samarraie and Hurmuzan, 2018). Finally, the contexts fostering creativity should be clarified, for example, exercising (Frith et al., 2019) or listening to music (Ritter and Ferguson, 2017).
Conclusion
The aim of this opinion paper was to suggest a framework to investigate habits targeting performance optimization, going beyond the existing health-focused habit research. We developed the idea of performance habits which can be split into individual strategies to improve the following dimensions: eat, move, sleep, relax, learn, be effective, think, and create.
Following the purpose of mapping reviews (Cooper, 2016; Miake-Lye et al., 2016; Perryman, 2016), the goal of this opinion paper was not to reach a definitive conclusion about the field of performance habits but rather to showcase this large area. It is hoped that it will establish the ground for future systematic investigation and experimental endeavor. Consequently, the framework presented should not be considered as definitive but as subject to evolution. The dimensions that we suggest here need to be further refined, with the help of quantitative and qualitative research, to understand the extent to which they effectively contribute to performance according to the domain considered. If some have already received attention from habit researchers (e.g., dietary behavior, physical activity, sleep), we argue that the other dimensions would benefit as well from the theoretical consideration of habits. Additionally, research should also consider to which extent the habit–performance relationship can be seen as a “one-size-fits-all” association or should be better individualized (e.g., Sales et al., 2014) and also investigate the influence of potential moderators such as the use of pharmaceuticals (Marcora, 2016) and biological rhythms (Atkinson and Reilly, 1996). Furthermore, the investigation of these eight dimensions raises some methodological concerns. For example, logging habits linked to strategies fostering learning, productivity, executive functions, and creativity may differ from what has been done so far in habit research and potentially require the development of specific instruments. It should also be taken into account that each dimension may interact with the others regarding their influence on performance. Finally, one should consider that striving for performance may also include the reversal of bad habits, which otherwise may eventually lead to addictive/compulsive behavior (Malloy-Diniz et al., 2019).
At the theoretical level, there is a need to investigate whether habits, based on their characteristics (Gardner, 2015; Wood, 2017), do serve performance better than repetitive (but non-habitual) ways of realizing certain actions. This will help to develop our understanding of the role of habits in helping individuals to successfully achieve their goals, with the ultimate objective of exploring the extent to which habits are linked to evolutionary human success in that they help to offer stability in an everchanging, complex, and modern human environment (Buss, 2019; Furley, 2019).
Statements
Author contributions
SL and DK prepared the first draft. TH, FJ, and EM provided critical comments to significantly improve the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
1.^Retrieved on June 15, 2020: https://www.forbes.com/sites/deeppatel/2017/07/14/10-daily-habits-of-the-most-productive-leaders/#49599b407e9c.
2.^The search was completed on January 13, 2020, with the Web of Science, all databases included, for the past 10 years (period 2010–2020). The following keywords were entered: meta-analysis or review in the Title field and performance in the All Fields field. All document types (full papers, proceedings papers, meeting abstract, etc.) in English language were considered. All Web of Science categories were included, and 34,654 unique results were retrieved. The results were exported to the reference software Zotero. From the titles and abstracts screening, SL and DK extracted higher-order themes matching the intended scope of the framework (i.e., strategies to improve performance that can be turned into habits) and represented them on a visual map. The visual map was then refined with TH, FJ, and EM until consensus was reached.
References
1
AirdT. P.DaviesR. W.CarsonB. P. (2018). Effects of fasted vs fed-state exercise on performance and post-exercise metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports28, 1476–1493. 10.1111/sms.13054
2
Al-SamarraieH.HurmuzanS. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Think. Skills Creat.27, 78–91. 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
3
Álvarez-BuenoC.HillmanC. H.Cavero-RedondoI.Sánchez-LópezM.Pozuelo-CarrascosaD. P.Martínez-VizcaínoV. (2020). Aerobic fitness and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci.38, 582–589. 10.1080/02640414.2020.1720496
4
AmholtT. T.DammeyerJ.CarterR.NiclasenJ. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achievement among school-aged children: a systematic review. Child Indic. Res.66, 351. 10.1007/s12187-020-09725-9
5
AtkinsonG.ReillyT. (1996). Circadian variation in sports performance. Sports Med.21, 292–312. 10.2165/00007256-199621040-00005
6
BakerJ.YoungB. (2014). 20 years later: deliberate practice and the development of expertise in sport. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol.7, 135–157. 10.1080/1750984x.2014.896024
7
BoehmJ. K.KubzanskyL. D. (2012). The heart's content: the association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol. Bull.138, 655–691. 10.1037/A0027448
8
BolierL.HavermanM.WesterhofG. J.RiperH.SmitF.BohlmeijerE. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health13:119. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119
9
BonnarD.BartelK.KakoschkeN.LangC. (2018). Sleep interventions designed to improve athletic performance and recovery: a systematic review of current approaches. Sports Med.48, 683–703. 10.1007/s40279-017-0832-x
10
BriguglioM.VitaleJ. A.GalentinoR.BanfiG.Zanaboni DinaC.BonaA.et al. (2020). Healthy eating, physical activity, and sleep hygiene (HEPAS) as the winning triad for sustaining physical and mental health in patients at risk for or with neuropsychiatric disorders: considerations for clinical practice. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.16, 55–70. 10.2147/NDT.S229206
11
BurchardB. (2017). High Performance Habits. New York, NY: Hay House.
12
BurkeL. M.KiensB.IvyJ. L. (2004). Carbohydrates and fat for training and recovery. J. Sports Sci.22, 15–30. 10.1080/0264041031000140527
13
BussD. M. (2019). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. London: Routledge.
14
ButlerM.McCreedyE.NelsonV. A.DesaiP.RatnerE.FinkH. A.et al. (2018). Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med.168, 63–68. 10.7326/M17-1531
15
CepedaN. J.PashlerH.VulE.WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol. Bull.132, 354–380. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
16
ChanJ. S. Y.DengK.WuJ.YanJ. H. (2019). Effects of meditation and mind–body exercises on older adults' cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Gerontologist59, e782–e790. 10.1093/geront/gnz022
17
ChangY. K.LabbanJ. D.GapinJ. I.EtnierJ. L. (2012). The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Brain Res.1453, 87–101. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068
18
CharmazK. (2002). The self as habit: the reconstruction of self in chronic illness. OTJR Occupat. Participat. Health22(Suppl. 1), 31S−41S. 10.1177/15394492020220s105
19
ChoY.HongN.KimK.-W.ChoS. J.LeeM.LeeY.-H.et al. (2019). The effectiveness of intermittent fasting to reduce body mass index and glucose metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. Res.8:1645. 10.3390/jcm8101645
20
ChungK.-F.ChanM.-S.LamY.-Y.LaiC. S.-Y.YeungW.-F. (2017). School-based sleep education programs for short sleep duration in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sch. Health87, 401–408. 10.1111/josh.12509
21
ClarkF. A. (2000). The concepts of habit and routine: a preliminary theoretical synthesis. Occupat. Ther. J. Res.20(Suppl. 1), 123S−137S. 10.1177/15394492000200s114
22
CliffordT.JeffriesO.StevensonE. J.DaviesK. A. B. (2019). The effects of vitamin C and E on exercise-induced physiological adaptations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.18, 1–11. 10.1080/10408398.2019.1703642
23
CooperI. D. (2016). What is a mapping study?. J. Med. Libr. Assoc.104, 76–78. 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013
24
CotrenaC.BrancoL. D.CardosoC. O.WongC. E.FonsecaR. P. (2016). The predictive impact of biological and sociocultural factors on executive processing: the role of age, education, and frequency of reading and writing habits. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult23, 75–84. 10.1080/23279095.2015.1012760
25
CraddockJ. C.NealeE. P.PeoplesG. E.ProbstY. C. (2019). Vegetarian-based dietary patterns and their relation with inflammatory and immune biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr.10, 433–451. 10.1093/advances/nmy103
26
DelgadoP.VargasC.AckermanR.SalmerónL. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: a meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educ. Res. Rev.25, 23–38. 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
27
DewaldJ. F.MeijerA. M.OortF. J.KerkhofG. A.BögelsS. M. (2010). The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Sleep Med. Rev.14, 179–189. 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.004
28
DiamondA. (2013). Executive functions. Ann. Rev. Psychol.64, 135–168. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
29
DietrichA.KansoR. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychol. Bull.136, 822–848. 10.1037/a0019749
30
DubucM. M.Aubertin-LeheudreM.KarelisA. D. (2019). Lifestyle habits predict academic performance in high school students: the adolescent student academic performance longitudinal study (ASAP). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17:243. 10.3390/ijerph17010243
31
DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.MarshE. J.NathanM. J.WillinghamD. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest14, 4–58. 10.1177/1529100612453266
32
FerrissT. (2017). Tools of Titans: The Tactics, Routines, and Habits of Billionaires, Icons, and World-class Performers.New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
33
FieseB. H.TomchoT. J.DouglasM.JosephsK.PoltrockS.BakerT. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration?J. Fam. Psychol.16, 381–390. 10.1037//0893-3200.16.4.381
34
FiorellaL. (2020). The science of habit and its implications for student learning and well-being. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 32, 603–625. 10.1007/s10648-020-09525-1
35
FordM. T.CerasoliC. P.HigginsJ. A.DecesareA. L. (2011). Relationships between psychological, physical, and behavioural health and work performance: a review and meta-analysis. Work Stress25, 185–204. 10.1080/02678373.2011.609035
36
FosseT. H.BuchR.SäfvenbomR.MartinussenM. (2015). The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy. J. Milit. Stud.6, 47–65. 10.1515/jms-2016-0197
37
FriedrichA.SchlarbA. A. (2018). Let's talk about sleep: a systematic review of psychological interventions to improve sleep in college students. J. Sleep Res.27, 4–22. 10.1111/jsr.12568
38
FrithE.RyuS.KangM.LoprinziP. D. (2019). Systematic review of the proposed associations between physical exercise and creative thinking. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess.15, 858–877. 10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1773
39
FurleyP. (2019). What modern sports competitions can tell us about human nature. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.14, 138–155. 10.1177/1745691618794912
40
GardnerB. (2015). A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit' in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol. Rev.9, 277–295. 10.1080/17437199.2013.876238
41
GardnerB.PhillipsL. A.JudahG. (2016). Habitual instigation and habitual execution: definition, measurement, and effects on behaviour frequency. Br. J. Health Psychol.21, 613–630. 10.1111/bjhp.12189
42
GardnerB.RebarA. L.LallyP. (2020). ‘Habitually deciding’ or ‘habitually doing’? A response to Hagger (2019). Psychol. Sport Exerc. 47:101539. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.05.008
43
GraybielA. M. (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.31, 359–387. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112851
44
HaggerM. S. (2019). Habit and physical activity: theoretical advances, practical implications, and agenda for future research. Psychol. Sport Exerc.42, 118–129. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.007
45
HaggerM. S. (2020). Redefining habits and linking habits with other implicit processes. Psychol. Sport Exerc.46:101606. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101606
46
HensleyL. C.MunnK. J. (2020). The power of writing about procrastination: journaling as a tool for change. J. Further Higher Educ.1–16. 10.1080/0309877x.2019.1702154
47
HeynP.AbreuB. C.OttenbacherK. J. (2004). The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.85, 1694–1704. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.019
48
JakA. J.SeelyeA. M.JurickS. M. (2013). Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol. Rev.23, 13–26. 10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5
49
KaplanS.BermanM. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.5, 43–57. 10.1177/1745691609356784
50
KoçakÖ.YildirimÖ.KurşunE.YildirimG. (2016). Investigating the status of tablet computers and E-books use of open education faculty students. Int. J. Dist. Educ. Technol.14, 49–63. 10.4018/ijdet.2016040104
51
KristoA. S.GultekinB.OztagM.SikalidisA. K. (2020). The effect of eating habits' quality on scholastic performance in turkish adolescents. Behav. Sci.10:31. 10.3390/bs10010031
52
LabordeS.HosangT.MosleyE.DossevilleF. (2019). Influence of a 30-day slow-paced breathing intervention compared to social media use on subjective sleep quality and cardiac vagal activity. J. Clin. Med. Res.8:193. 10.3390/jcm8020193
53
LackeyA. E.MoshiriM.PandeyT.LallC.LalwaniN.BhargavaP. (2014). Productivity, part 1: getting things done, using e-mail, scanners, reference managers, note-taking applications, and text expanders. J. Am. Coll. Radiol.11, 481–489. 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.020
54
LallyP.GardnerB. (2013). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychol. Rev.7, S137–S158. 10.1080/17437199.2011.603640
55
LampitA.HallockH.ValenzuelaM. (2014). Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med.11:e1001756. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756
56
LeeJ.StoneA. J. (2020). Combined aerobic and resistance training for cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and walking capacity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.29:104498. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104498
57
LeeJ. E.JuY. J.ParkE.-C.LeeS. Y. (2020). Effect of poor sleep quality on subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or SCD-related functional difficulties: results from 220,000 nationwide general populations without dementia. J. Affect. Dis.260, 32–37. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.082
58
LewisC.RestauriN.ClarkT. (2019). Strategies for increasing radiologist efficiency. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol.48, 103–104. 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.12.001
59
LongoU. G.SofiF.DinuM.BertonA.CiprianiG.MassaroniC.et al. (2019). Alpine junior world ski championship: nutritional habits and performance in elite skiers. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness59, 1339–1345. 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09386-1
60
LopezP. D.CativoE. H.AtlasS. A.RosendorffC. (2019). The effect of vegan diets on blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Med.132, 875–883.e7. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.044
61
LundqvistC. (2011). Well-being in competitive sports—the feel-good factor? A review of conceptual considerations of well-being. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol.4, 109–127. 10.1080/1750984X.2011.584067
62
MacnamaraB. N.MoreauD.HambrickD. Z. (2016). The relationship between deliberate practice and performance in sports: a meta-analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.11, 333–350. 10.1177/1745691616635591
63
Malloy-DinizL. F.BreversD.TurelO. (2019). Editorial: etiology, pathogenesis, and consequences of maladaptive habits. Front. Psychol.10:2613. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02613
64
ManzoniG. M.PagniniF.CastelnuovoG.MolinariE. (2008). Relaxation training for anxiety: a ten-years systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry8:41. 10.1186/1471-244X-8-41
65
MarcoraS. (2016). Can doping be a good thing? Using psychoactive drugs to facilitate physical activity behaviour. Sports Med.46, 1–5. 10.1007/s40279-015-0412-x
66
MartlandR.MondelliV.GaughranF.StubbsB. (2020). Can high-intensity interval training improve physical and mental health outcomes? A meta-review of 33 systematic reviews across the lifespan. J. Sports Sci.38, 430–469. 10.1080/02640414.2019.1706829
67
McGarryT. (2013). Routledge Handbook of Sports Performance Analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203806913
68
Melby-LervågM.HulmeC. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev. Psychol.49, 270–291. 10.1037/a0028228
69
Miake-LyeI. M.HempelS.ShanmanR.ShekelleP. G. (2016). What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst. Rev.5:28. 10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x
70
ParkerC. P.BaltesB. B.YoungS. A.HuffJ. W.AltmannR. A.LaCostH. A.et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J. Organ. Behav.24, 389–416. 10.1002/job.198
71
PerrymanC. L. (2016). Mapping studies. J. Med. Libr. Assoc.104, 79–82. 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.014
72
PhillipsL. A. (2020). Challenging assumptions about habit: a response to Hagger (2019). Psychol. Sport Exerc.47:101502. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.03.005
73
PilcherJ. J.HuffcuttA. I. (1996). Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: a meta-analysis. Sleep19, 318–326. 10.1093/sleep/19.4.318
74
RaabM.LobingerB.HoffmannS.PizzeraA.LabordeS. (2015). Performance Psychology: Perception, Action, Cognition, and Emotion.Amsterdam: Academic Press.
75
RampersaudG. C.PereiraM. A.GirardB. L.AdamsJ.MetzlJ. D. (2005). Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children and adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc.105, 743–760; quiz 761–742. 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.007
76
RaynerK.SchotterE. R.MassonM. E. J.PotterM. C.TreimanR. (2016). So much to read, so little time: how do we read, and can speed reading help?Psychol. Sci. Public Interest.17, 4–34. 10.1177/1529100615623267
77
RebarA. L.ReynoldsA. C.FergusonS. A.GardnerB. (2020). Accounting for automatic processes in sleep health. J. Sleep Res. e12987. 10.1111/jsr.12987
78
RitterS. M.FergusonS. (2017). Happy creativity: listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PLoS ONE12:e0182210. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182210
79
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol.52, 141–166. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
80
RyffC. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother. Psychosom.83, 10–28. 10.1159/000353263
81
RyffC. D.SingerB. (1996). Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychother. Psychosom.65, 14–23. 10.1159/000289026
82
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu. Rev. Psychol.52, 471–499. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
83
SalesN. M.PelegriniP. B.GoerschM. C. (2014). Nutrigenomics: definitions and advances of this new science. J. Nutr. Metab.2014:202759. 10.1155/2014/202759
84
SciontiN.CavalleroM.ZogmaisterC.MarzocchiG. M. (2019). Is cognitive training effective for improving executive functions in preschoolers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol.10:2812. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02812
85
ScottG.LeritzL. E.MumfordM. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creat. Res. J.16, 361–388. 10.1207/s15326934crj1604_1
86
ScullinM. K.KruegerM. L.BallardH. K.PruettN.BliwiseD. L. (2018). The effects of bedtime writing on difficulty falling asleep: a polysomnographic study comparing to-do lists and completed activity lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.147, 139–146. 10.1037/xge0000374
87
ShinJ. C.KimJ.Grigsby-ToussaintD. (2017). Mobile phone interventions for sleep disorders and sleep quality: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth5:e131. 10.2196/mhealth.7244
88
SimonsD. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.GathercoleS. E.ChabrisC. F.HambrickD. Z.et al. (2016). Do brain-training programs work?Psychol. Sci. Public Interest.17, 103–186. 10.1177/1529100616661983
89
SmithP. J.BlumenthalJ. A.HoffmanB. M.CooperH.StraumanT. A.Welsh-BohmerK.et al. (2010). Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychos. Med.72, 239–252. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d14633
90
SoltaniS.JayediA.Shab-BidarS.Becerra-TomásN.Salas-SalvadóJ. (2019). Adherence to the mediterranean diet in relation to all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Adv. Nutr.10, 1029–1039. 10.1093/advances/nmz041
91
StojanovicM.GrundA.FriesS. (2020). App-based habit building reduces motivational impairments during studying - an event sampling study. Front. Psychol.11:167. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00167
92
TaetzschA.DasS. K.BrownC.KraussA.SilverR. E.RobertsS. B. (2018). Are gluten-free diets more nutritious? An evaluation of self-selected and recommended gluten-free and gluten-containing dietary patterns. Nutrients10:1881. 10.3390/nu10121881
93
TangY. Y. (2014). Short-term meditation intervention improves self-regulation and academic performance. J. Child Adolesc. Behav.2:154. 10.4172/2375-4494.1000154
94
ValgeirsdottirD.OnarheimB. (2017). Studying creativity training programs: a methodological analysis. Creat. Innov. Manag.26, 430–439. 10.1111/caim.12245
95
Van De WalleG. P.VukovichM. D. (2018). The effect of nitrate supplementation on exercise tolerance and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res.32, 1796–1808. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002046
96
ViguilioukE.KendallC. W.KahleováH.RahelićD.Salas-SalvadóJ.ChooV. L.et al. (2019). Effect of vegetarian dietary patterns on cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Nutr.38, 1133–1145. 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.032
97
WenD.UteschT.WuJ.RobertsonS.LiuJ.HuG.et al. (2019). Effects of different protocols of high intensity interval training for VOmax improvements in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J. Sci. Med. Sport22, 941–947. 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.013
98
WilkeJ.MüllerA.-L.GiescheF.PowerG.AhmediH.BehmD. G. (2020). Acute effects of foam rolling on range of motion in healthy adults: a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis. Sports Med.50, 387–402. 10.1007/s40279-019-01205-7
99
Wilson-BarnesS. L.HuntJ. E. A.Lanham-NewS. A.MandersR. J. F. (2020). Effects of vitamin D on health outcomes and sporting performance: implications for elite and recreational athletes. Nutr. Bull.45, 11–24. 10.1111/nbu.12413
100
WoodA. M.FrohJ. J.GeraghtyA. W. A. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: a review and theoretical integration. Clin. Psychol. Rev.30, 890–905. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005
101
WoodW. (2017). Habit in personality and social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.21, 389–403. 10.1177/1088868317720362
102
YangJ. (2015). The influence of motor expertise on the brain activity of motor task performance: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.15, 381–394. 10.3758/s13415-014-0329-0
103
ZaccaroA.PiarulliA.LaurinoM.GarbellaE.MenicucciD.NeriB.et al. (2018). How breath-control can change your life: a systematic review on psycho-physiological correlates of slow breathing. Front. Hum. Neurosci.12:353. 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00353
Summary
Keywords
optimization, automatic processes, habits, performance, human
Citation
Laborde S, Kauschke D, Hosang TJ, Javelle F and Mosley E (2020) Performance Habits: A Framework Proposal. Front. Psychol. 11:1815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01815
Received
08 April 2020
Accepted
01 July 2020
Published
19 August 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Gary Edward McPherson, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Reviewed by
Adina Mornell, University of Music and Performing Arts Munich, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Laborde, Kauschke, Hosang, Javelle and Mosley.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sylvain Laborde s.laborde@dshs-koeln.de
This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.