Corrigendum: Risks for Child Cognitive Development in Rural Contexts
- 1Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 2Fundación Mundo Sano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 3Instituto de Educación, Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 4Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 5Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 6Unidad de Neurobiología Aplicada, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas “Norberto Quirno”, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 7Facultad de Lenguas y Educación, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain
A Corrigendum on
Risks for Child Cognitive Development in Rural Contexts
by Hermida, M. J., Shalom, D. E., Segretin, M. S., Goldin, A. P., Abril, M. C., Lipina, S. J., et al. (2019). Front. Psychol. 9:2735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02735
There were three mistakes in Table 2. Firstly, column “Media” should be column “Mean.” Secondly, in reference 6 (footnote) “subsides” should be “subsidies.” Thirdly, in row “Frequency of mother child play (by week),” column “Urban/Mean” it says 2.14 and it should say 5.14.
There were two mistakes in Table 3. In row “Incubator/yes,” column “Urban/valid percentage,” it says 1.5 and it should say 10.5. Also, in row “Potential Nervous System conditions: No,” column “Rural/ Valid percentage,” it says 7.2 and it should say 70.2.
There were four mistakes in Table 4. Firstly, in rows “0–3 switchs,” “4–5 switchs,” and “6 switchs,” the word “switchs” should be “switches.” Additionally, in row “Learning,” column “Urban/mean,” it says 2.87 and it should say 20.87.
Finally, there were two mistakes in Table 6. In row “Number of siblings,” column “F,” it says 2.151 and it should say 20.151. Also, in row “Past preschool attendance,” column “F,” it says 5.798 and it should say 50.798.
Table 2. Descriptive statistic of the continuous variables obtained from parents' interviews in urban and rural contexts.
Table 3. Descriptive statistic of the nominal variables obtained from parents' interviews in urban and rural contexts.
Table 6. Significant results of ANOVAs: environmental and individual variables that differ by context.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: socioeconomic status, rural context, urban context, child cognitive development, executive functions, preschool attendance, father's educational level
Citation: Hermida MJ, Shalom DE, Segretin MS, Goldin AP, Abril MC, Lipina SJ and Sigman M (2021) Corrigendum: Risks for Child Cognitive Development in Rural Contexts. Front. Psychol. 12:647039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647039
Received: 28 December 2020; Accepted: 15 January 2021;
Published: 11 February 2021.
Edited and reviewed by: Yvette Renee Harris, Miami University, United States
Copyright © 2021 Hermida, Shalom, Segretin, Goldin, Abril, Lipina and Sigman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria Julia Hermida, firstname.lastname@example.org