Ximei Xia
Xiaotian Wang
Yuting Wang- Department of Psychology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
Although the factors influencing sexual health have been explored by researchers, the impact of leisure and personality on psychosexual adjustment and the interaction of these two factors remain unknown. This study investigated the relationship between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment based on the compensation theory and the social learning theory. The differences in psychosexual adjustment across different personality types were also explored. Finally, we examined the interaction between personality and leisure satisfaction based on the personal-environment fit models. The participants in this study were 1,161 college students. The results supported all the hypotheses proposed. There was a significant positive correlation between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment. Participants of four personality types (the overcontrolled, high-moderate, low-moderate, and resilient groups) had different performance in psychosexual adjustment. The resilient group had the highest scores, while the overcontrolled group had the lowest scores. The results suggest that there is an interaction between personality and leisure satisfaction. Our research could enrich the research contents of leisure and personality and provide a practical basis for the improvement of college students in psychosexual adjustment.
Introduction
Psychosexual adjustment is a psychological variables that affects sexual functioning, including thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and interpersonal relationships (Sprankle, 2015). When researchers investigate sexual functioning and sexual health, they mostly discuss them in terms of physiological aspects (Cherven et al., 2021). However, adolescents and young adults are accompanied by a series of psychosocial developments as well. In China, young people tend to be more open-minded about sexuality along with social progress (Song, 2015). However, current inappropriate sex education runs counter to the trend toward openness among the youth. Consequently, many teenagers still have rigid attitudes about gender and sexuality as well as misconceptions about puberty and masturbation (Sa et al., 2021). This probably causes adolescents to have difficulty in adjusting. Especially after they enter college, as their scope of interpersonal communication expands, they may be confronted with the challenges of forming intimate relationships in pre-adulthood (Erikson, 1963), including issues related to psychosexual adjustment. In light of this situation, our study mainly focused on the psychosexual adjustment of college students.
In general, psychosexual adjustment can be divided into three domains: psychosexual selfhood (intrapersonal functioning such as body image and self-perception), psychosexual socialization (related to the interaction of the individuals with their social environment), and sexual/intimate behavior (sexualized behaviors and experiences; Dekker et al., 2017). Scholars also have measured psychosexual adjustment from 12 dimensions, including internal sexual control (individuals feel their sexual life under their control; Alley and Strassberg, 2020).
Previous studies have found that psychosexual adjustment is linked to stress (Arya et al., 2019), cancer and treatment (Barnett et al., 2016; Rizzuto et al., 2021), puberty development (Dwyer, 2020), leisure (Williams et al., 2020), and personality (Thompson et al., 2019; Hashemi, 2020), among which leisure is of great significance to everyone, especially college students who have plenty of free time (Das and Barman, 2019). In addition, the role of individual personality on sexual psychology has also been of interest (Frías et al., 2017). As a result, our study focused on the relationship among leisure satisfaction, psychosexual adjustment, and personality.
Leisure Satisfaction and Psychosexual Adjustment
Leisure satisfaction refers to positive views or feelings obtained in leisure activities, which reflects the overall satisfaction degree of leisure experience (Beard and Ragheb, 1980). According to the compensation theory (Wilson, 1980), individuals can compensate for negative aspects in other areas of life through well-experienced leisure activities. Some hold that leisure satisfaction may even be more important than other sources of life satisfaction (Tokay Argan and Mersin, 2021). From an ecological perspective, both positive leisure activities and consequent flow experiences (wonderful experiences of being fully involved in the present moment) not only can help prevent problematic behaviors such as aggression (Park et al., 2017) and substance use (Santini et al., 2020) among young people but also promote their development and adjustment (Mahoney et al., 2009; Freire and Teixeira, 2018). Specifically, excellent leisure experience is associated with a clear sense of self-identity (Mansfield et al., 2020), the formation of social relationships (Kim et al., 2016a), and relief from stress (Chun et al., 2021). All these factors are conducive to the development of psychosexual adjustment (Bigras et al., 2015; Kim and Jang, 2020). Considering leisure is a kind of social construction, Bandura’s social learning theory (Bandura and Walters, 1977) can provide us insights into the understanding of how people promote their psychosexual adjustment through leisure activities. Positive participation and meaningful experience in leisure activities allow the youth to learn how to socialize properly (Granzin and Haggard, 2000) and gain interpersonal support and confidence (Kim et al., 2016b), which have an important impact on their psychosexual adjustment (Parchomiuk, 2019; Barrada and Castro, 2020).
In contrast, a lack of pleasure in leisure seems to be associated with an unhealthy status. For example, leisure boredom could help predict substance use and Internet use in adolescents (Weybright et al., 2015; Wang, 2019). In the field of sexual psychology, studies have shown a correlation between leisure boredom and adolescent risky sexual behaviors (Miller et al., 2014). Based on these facts, we proposed the following first hypothesis:
H1: Leisure satisfaction is positively correlated with psychosexual adjustment.
Personality and Psychosexual Adjustment
Personality is a mode of thinking, feeling and behaving that help to differentiate people from each other. It affects a person’s response to all kinds of situations (Caspi, 1998). Personality is relatively stable throughout life even during adolescence, fluctuating only within a certain range (Brown and Prinstein, 2011). The five-factor model of personality (Van Leeuwen et al., 2004) is one of the most widely used trait models with high reliability and validity at different developmental stages of the life cycle (De Clercq et al., 2009). It measures personality from five dimensions: extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism (also known as emotional stability). However, individuals are usually affected by different trait dimensions simultaneously (Atkins and Hart, 2008). According to the five-factor model, some studies have confirmed that the personality structure can be divided into four classes: the moderate, protected, vulnerable, and undercontrolled groups (De Clercq et al., 2012) or into three classes: the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled groups (Zhang et al., 2015). In a longitudinal study of Finnish adults, the researchers identified five personality types: the resilient, overcontrolled, undercontrolled, reserved, and ordinary groups (Kinnunen et al., 2012). Overall, resilient/protected individuals typically have low neuroticism and high levels of the other four dimensions. Overcontrolled/vulnerable individuals are exactly the opposite, with high neuroticism and low levels of the other dimensions. Undercontrolled individuals are characterized by low conscientiousness, slightly high neuroticism, and high openness and extraversion (Zhang et al., 2015). Reserved people usually have low openness. Moreover, all personality traits of moderate/ordinary individuals are at the middle levels (Kinnunen et al., 2012).
As a typical individual difference variable, the role of personality on sexual psychology and behavior has also been widely studied. Eysenck and Wilson (1976) suggested that extroverts are thrill seekers, while neurotic people do not enjoy sexual behavior as much because they are extremely tense. Moreover, extraversion is positively correlated with sexting, while agreeableness and emotional stability are negatively correlated (Delevi and Weisskirch, 2013). Openness is negatively correlated with sexual prejudice, for people who are higher in openness are more likely to accept social changes (Miller et al., 2012). Furthermore, personality types and personality disorders caused by the mixture of multiple personality traits are also related to psychosexual adjustment. Children of the undercontrolled type are more likely to have sex before the age of 16 (Atkins and Hart, 2008). Women with borderline personality disorder have been found to have chaotic relationships and more sexual partners in a short period of time (Thompson et al., 2019). However, previous studies on the influence of personality on psychosexual health have mostly focused on unhealthy sexuality and morbid personality and have not explored the normal groups. Therefore, we proposed the second hypothesis:
H2: Psychosexual adjustment differs across different personality types.
The Moderating Effects of Personality
There is an interaction between personality traits and leisure satisfaction. Scholars generally hold that leisure has a profound and unique reflection on our personality (Munusturlar and Argan, 2016). Furthermore, the relationship between personality and leisure satisfaction has physiological basis. Eysenck and Wilson (1976) suggested that extroverts have high cortical inhibition and low baseline arousal, which causes them to seek external stimulation. Introverts, on the other hand, have a low arousal threshold and need less stimulation to maintain optimal levels. People with lower emotional stability are less playful and get less enjoyment from social activities (Lepp et al., 2015). Additionally, people of neuroticism may feel unfulfilled in leisure and be less cheerful than other personality types (Codish and Ravid, 2015). People of the traditional type of personality can obtain higher educational satisfaction in leisure than the investigative, enterprising, realistic, and artistic types. They score higher on social satisfaction than the enterprising type as well (Park, 2009).
We have found the relationship between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment as well as the relationship between personality and psychosexual adjustment. However, as far as we know, no one has investigated the relationship among these three variables. Under the theoretical framework of personal-environment fit models (Iso-Ahola and Weissinger, 1990), studies conducted have proved that the overcontrolled adolescent maladaptive behavior (such as criminal behavior) is a strategy to buffer leisure boredom (Spaeth et al., 2015). Moreover, it has been shown that there is an interaction between leisure satisfaction and personality on subjective well-being (Liu, 2014). Based on the research mentioned above, we proposed the third hypothesis:
H3: Leisure satisfaction and personality have an interactive effect on psychosexual adjustment.
In general, this study aims to explore the relationship between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment based on the compensation theory and the social learning theory. We also explored the differences in the psychosexual adjustment across different personality types. Furthermore, we examined the moderating effect of personality types between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment. We propose the following three hypotheses: H1: Leisure satisfaction is positively correlated with psychosexual adjustment. H2: Psychosexual adjustment differs across different personality types. H3: Leisure satisfaction and personality have an interactive effect on psychosexual adjustment. The theoretical model is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The moderation model used in this study.
Materials and Methods
Participants and Design
Participants in the study were undergraduate students from a university in China. The research team recruited participants through posters and online notifications. Our team informed them of the principles of confidentiality and voluntary. Participants would take part in the survey in designated classrooms at specified time, and would not get rewarded. In addition, the survey would be done anonymously and the results would be kept private. Eventually, a total of 1,161 students were recruited to answer the questionnaires. Data collecting was conducted from November 2021 to January 2022. One research group member and one school teacher were designated and trained as the experimenters. To start with, the research group member read the instructions. The participants were asked to complete the questionnaires in 25 min.
Invalid questionnaires (answering regularly or missing more than five questions) were removed after all the questionnaires were collected. Following the removal, 1,075 valid questionnaires were obtained. The rate of effective recovery was 92.6%. The average age of the participants was 18.7 (SD = 1.07). There were 511 males (47.5%) and 564 females (52.5%) participants. A total of 652 (60.7%) participants were rural residents, and 423 (39.3%) were urban residents.
Measures
Leisure Satisfaction
The leisure satisfaction questionnaire for university students (Bingzheng et al., 2010) was used for the measurement of leisure satisfaction. It consists of three factors: relaxation satisfaction, contact satisfaction and transcendent satisfaction. Relaxation satisfaction refers to evaluation of the rest function of leisure. It contains six items such as “Leisure activities can help me relax.” Contact satisfaction refers to evaluation of communication function of leisure. It contains five items such as “My social interaction with others improves during leisure time.” Transcendent satisfaction refers to evaluation of self-development function of leisure. It contains six items such as “Leisure can improve my abilities.” The Cronbach’s alphas of each factor were 0.95, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively in this study. And the Cronbach’s alpha of the whole scale was 0.97 in this study. A 5-point Likert scale was adopted (1 represents very dissatisfied, 2 represents relatively dissatisfied, 3 represents neutral, 4 represents relatively satisfied, and 5 represents very satisfied). A higher score indicated a higher degree of leisure satisfaction.
Psychosexual Adjustment
The puberty psychosexual health scale (Yi and Yong, 2006) was used for the assessment of psychosexual adjustment. The scale was based on the previous studies (Dekker et al., 2017; Alley and Strassberg, 2020), which composed of three factors (sexual cognition, sexual values, and psychosexual adjustment). We used the psychosexual adjustment subscale, which contains three dimensions (self-adjustment, social adjustment, and sexual control). Specifically, self-adjustment refers to the adjustment to gender roles and changes in sexual characteristics. Social adjustment refers to the ability of expressing affection and satisfying sexual desires in ways that conform to sociocultural norms. And sexual control refers to the control over sexualized behavior. Self-adjustment involves five questions including “I am very satisfied with my gender.” Social adjustment consists of nine questions including “I express my affection in a similar way to my peers.” Sexual control contains six questions including “I cannot help but watch some pornographic publications or programs.” Multiple fit indices for psychosexual adjustment were evaluated in confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that the χ2/df ratio was 7.64, CFI = 0.82, GFI = 0.89, and AGFI = 0.86 in this study. The Cronbach’s alpha of psychosexual adjustment in this study was 0.81. A 5-point Likert scale was adopted (1 represents strongly disagree, 2 represents relatively disagree, 3 represents neutral, 4 represents relatively agree, and 5 represents strongly agree). A higher score indicated a higher level of psychosexual adjustment.
Personality
The neuroticism extraversion openness five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI; Yao and Liang, 2010) was used for the assessment of personality. The NEO-FFI measures five personality traits: extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. There are 12 items for each trait, with a total of 60 items. The extraversion subscale contains items including “I like being around people.” The openness subscale contains items like “I do not like fantasy.” The agreeableness subscale contains items including “Most of the people I know like me.” The conscientiousness subscale contains items like “I work tirelessly to reach my goals “. The neuroticism subscale contains items including “I have no worries.” The Cronbach’s alphas of the NEO-FFI in this study were 0.77 for extraversion, 0.67 for openness, 0.71 for agreeableness, 0.82 for conscientiousness, and 0.84 for neuroticism. A 5-point Likert scale was adopted in the questionnaire (1 represents strongly disagree, 2 represents relatively disagree, 3 represents neutral, 4 represents relatively agree, and 5 represents strongly agree). A higher score indicated a higher level of the trait.
Data Analysis
Mplus 8.0 was used for the confirmatory factor analysis and classification of personality types using latent profile analysis. SPSS 23.0 was used for the descriptive statistics analysis and Pearson correlation analysis. The difference in psychosexual adjustment across different personality types was analyzed based on the hierarchical linear models in SPSS. The moderating effects of personality on leisure satisfaction (independent variable) and psychosexual adjustment (dependent variable) were tested based on the hierarchical multiple regression models in SPSS. And p < 0.05 was set as of statistical significance.
Results
Common Method Bias
The Harman single-factor test was used to test the method bias. The variance explained by the first factor (“I have passion in leisure activities” from leisure satisfaction questionnaire) was 20.14%, below the 40% threshold. The result of the principal component factor analysis without rotation showed that 19 factors had eigenvalues greater than 1. Therefore, common method bias did not affect the results of this study.
Descriptive Statistics and Correlations
To test hypothesis 1, we used Pearson correlations. The means (M) and standard deviations (SD) of personality, leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment are shown in Table 1. Table 1 also shows the correlation matrix of these variables. Among all five personality traits, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were positively correlated with leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment (p < 0.01). Neuroticism was negatively correlated with leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment (p < 0.01). Leisure satisfaction was positively correlated with psychosexual adjustment (p < 0.01).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlations between personality, leisure satisfaction, and psychosexual adjustment (r, n = 1,075).
Latent Profile Analysis
To explore the potential patterns of personality traits, this study used latent profile analysis (LPA) with five personality traits as observation variables and one profile as the starting point. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Latent profile models (n = 1,075).
Table 2 contains the AIC, BIC, ABIC, entropy, and LMR statistics for each of the tested models. An optimal model fit is defined by lower AIC, BIC, and ABIC values (Finch, 2015). For all models, these three values decreased as the number of profiles increased from 1 to 5, providing support for the 5-profile solution. If the LMR value of model K reached the significance level (p < 0.05), it indicated that model K had a higher variance explanation rate than model K-1. According to the model fitting results in Table 2, the LMR values of the 2-profile model, 3-profile model and 4-profile model all reached the level of significance, showing that these three models were superior to the 5-profile solution. Furthermore, there was little difference in the index between the 4-profile model and the 5-profile model. Therefore, we preferred the 4-profile solution. Entropy represents classification accuracy, which generally has a high standard of 0.80 (Clark, 2010). Ultimately, the 4-profile model was chosen as the optimal latent profile analysis model.
Table 3 shows the Z scores of five personality traits for each personality profile. The overcontrolled group has higher neuroticism but lower scores in the other four dimensions, and Profile 1 matched these features. Profile 4 conformed to the definition of the resilient group, showing the lowest level of neuroticism and higher levels of the other four dimensions. All personality dimensions of Profile 2 and Profile 3 were almost at the average level. The only difference was that the scores of Profile 2 were slightly lower than those of Profile 3. Therefore, Profile 2 and Profile 3 were identified as typical personality types, with Profile 2 named the low-moderate group and Profile 3 named the high-moderate group.
Table 3. Statistical description of 4-profile model.
Hierarchical Linear Models
For the test of hypothesis 2, bar charts were used to show the differences in the Z scores of college students with different personality types in psychosexual adjustment (see Figure 2). Furthermore, four types of personality were included in the hierarchical linear models. Profiles 1, 2, and 3 were compared as reference groups to test their differences in self-adjustment, social adjustment, sexual control, and psychosexual adjustment. The results are shown in Table 4. There was no significant difference between Profile 1 and Profile 3 in the sexual control dimension (p = 0.326). Except for that dimension, all personality types showed differences in psychosexual adjustment.
Figure 2. Z scores for each profile (n = 1,075). Note: 1, self-adjustment, 2, social adjustment, 3, sexual control, 4, psychosexual adjustment, psychosexual adjustment is the sum of self-adjustment, social adjustment, and sexual control.
Table 4. Hierarchical linear models (n = 1,075).
Moderating Analysis
For the test of hypothesis 3, the hierarchical multiple regression models were used to investigate the moderating effects of personality on leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment. Among the four personality types, we selected the overcontrolled group as the reference group. Three dummy codes were used for the high-moderate group, the low-moderate group, and the resilient group. To reduce the collinearity between variables, we standardized the independent variable (leisure satisfaction) first. After that, the interaction term was calculated between the standardized independent variable and the moderating variable (personality types). Leisure satisfaction was put into the first layer. Then, dummy codes of the moderating variable were added to the second layer. Finally, the interaction terms were added into the regression equation as the third level. The results show that the interaction of the leisure satisfaction and the dummy variable for the high-moderate group, the low-moderate group, and the resilient group was all statistically significant, with p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.011, respectively, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Hierarchical multiple regression models with psychosexual adjustment as dependent variable.
To further explore the moderating effects of personality, we divided participants into two groups: a low leisure satisfaction group (scored one standard deviation below the average) and a high leisure satisfaction group (scored one standard deviation above the average). Figure 3 illustrates the moderating effects of personality. For the accurate demonstration of the moderating effects of each personality type, a linear regression model test was conducted for each group and the path coefficients were 0.24 for the overcontrolled group (t = 1.74, p = 0.089), 0.22 for the high-moderate group (t = 4.28, p < 0.001), 0.30 for the low-moderate group (t = 7.75, p < 0.001), and 0.47 for the resilient group (t = 3.49, p = 0.001).
Figure 3. A simple slope plot of the moderating effect (n = 1,075). Note: 1, overcontrolled group, 2, high-moderate group, 3, low-moderate group, 4 = resilient group.
Discussion
Overall, our study verified our three hypotheses, providing certain basis for the improvement of college students in psychosexual adjustment. First, there was a positive relationship between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment. Moreover, college students with different personality types have different performance in psychosexual adjustment in our study. In addition, personality and leisure satisfaction have an interactive effect on psychosexual adjustment. In general, good leisure experiences may improve individual psychosexual adjustment of all personality types.
Leisure Satisfaction and Psychosexual Adjustment
As expected, the results confirmed a link between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment. Consistent with previous research (Zerengok et al., 2018), when college students actively participated in leisure activities, they showed progress in social adjustment and reported psychological and physical benefits. This result can be interpreted based on social learning theory. People learn communication skills and norms, and learn to understand themselves and others appropriately through entertainment on informal occasions. Individuals could derive pleasure and social benefits from interpersonal interactions in leisure activities (Chao, 2013). In other words, positive leisure can enable people to achieve psychosexual socialization (Shin and You, 2013). Apart from this, leisure is regarded as a potential resource for people in dealing with some forms of stigma such as sexual orientation (Mock et al., 2013). Leisure could provide sexual minorities with a sense of belonging which brings benefits to their psychosexual selfhood, but this requires favorable social and relaxing conditions (Outley and McKenzie, 2007; Jones and McCarthy, 2010). As previous research has found, engaging in meaningful social leisure activities can positively impact current and future mental health (Timonen et al., 2021).
Based on the compensation theory, positive experience in leisure seems to be a powerful source of self-control efficacy (Stebbins, 2006). Due to the lack of leisure resources and opportunities, bored young people may turn to risky activities (Sharp et al., 2011). Leisure interventions that can change the leisure cognition of teenagers and help improve their leisure satisfaction, such as HealthWise (Motamedi et al., 2020), have been shown having the potential to reduce the likelihood of early sexual activity in boys.
Among all the relationships between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment, the relationship between contact satisfaction and self-adjustment was the strongest. One explanation is that self-esteem can be gained from social support (Erango and Ayka, 2015). When people get along well with others and receive positive feedback about themselves from others, they can improve their self-acceptance concerning physiology and psychology. This finding was also expressed by Cooley’s conception of the “looking-glass self” (Cooley, 1902), in which the actor constantly builds his self-image based on the reactions of others to his performances. Similarly, social interaction has explained more than half of the association between green space use and self-satisfaction (Dadvand et al., 2019).
Personality and Psychosexual Adjustment
We further explored the difference in psychosexual adjustment across different personality types. In the first place, we used the same five-factor model to identify different personality types as many human-centered studies do. Our results were consistent with the findings of other researchers but somewhat different. We found that the vast majority of Chinese college students in our research could be classified as the moderate group (there were differences between the high- and low-moderate groups), a small number of students (approximately 4.7%) could be classified as the resilient group and approximately 4.3% could be classified as the overcontrolled group. Unlike a previous study (Alessandri et al., 2014), we did not actually identify an undercontrolled group. This result may, in part, be explained by the stricter control of Chinese parents over teenagers and the corresponding more reserved qualities teenagers have (Ho, 1994; Wang et al., 2018).
The hierarchical linear models seem to indicate that the overcontrolled group was at a disadvantage in all dimensions of psychosexual adjustment compared with other groups. Only in the sex control dimension was there no significant difference between the overcontrolled group and the low-moderate group. The overcontrolled group scored relatively low in the dimension of extraversion and relatively high in neuroticism, showing inflexibility in cognition and behavior and high attention to detail processing (Gilbert et al., 2020). Besides, the overcontrolled group is usually associated with a higher likelihood of internalizing problems (Asendorpf et al., 2001). This situation is mainly due to the fact that overcontrolled individuals may have more difficulty participating in social activities or engaging fully in intimate relationships (Denissen et al., 2008). Nevertheless, this situation also entails that such individuals have a higher degree of control than undercontrolled people (Block and Block, 1980). This fact may explain why the overcontrolled group did not differ from the low-moderate group in sexual control.
The resilient group, the opposite of the overcontrolled group, showed an advantage across all dimensions. Adolescence is a time when young people can sort out their sexual identities and sexual orientation (Katz-Wise, 2015). Meanwhile, in this phase the youth might worry about their sexual attractiveness. Individuals in the resilient group excel at this stage because they are able to adapt to a variety of environmental needs (Asendorpf, 2006). Specifically, higher levels of resilience are associated with higher levels of self-acceptance and self-control (Baeva et al., 2016), both of which contribute to the development of psychosexual adjustment (Woodford et al., 2014; Magnusson et al., 2019).
Comparing Profiles 2 and 3, both of which were considered moderate, we found that the former profile performed better in psychosexual adjustment. But overall, they scored in the middle in psychosexual adjustment. Consistent with previous findings (Rettew et al., 2008), individuals with moderate characteristics belong to a stable class. They do not pursue stimulating experience too excessively and have a certain degree of self-protection. In addition, more agreeable and more open individuals may have greater psychological and physiological adjustment (Boyce and Wood, 2011; Ó Súilleabháin et al., 2018).
The Moderating Effects of Personality
Considering people with different personality types process information in different ways, we analyzed the interaction between leisure satisfaction and personality to understand how individuals apply leisure experience. The moderating effects of all personality types were positive, and the moderating effect of the resilient group was the most prominent. These results confirmed the applicability of personal-environment fit models to adolescent psychosexual adjustment. As a risk-protective factor, resilience can promote positive development during times of adversity (Luthar et al., 2000). In high-risk family settings, resilient youth are 3.5 times more likely to be free of health problems throughout their lifetime than their peers with low resilience (Hopkins et al., 2015). The moderating effects of the remaining personality types were also positive, but not as good as that of the resilience group. Moreover, it is worth emphasizing that leisure satisfaction seems to make a major contribution to the existence of a moderating effect. This further suggests that adolescents of different types could benefit from well-experienced leisure (Bradley and Inglis, 2012).
Conclusion
Our aim was to investigate the relationship among leisure satisfaction, personality, and psychosexual adjustment. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) within the framework of the compensation theory and social learning theory, there is a positive correlation between leisure satisfaction and psychosexual adjustment; (2) psychosexual adjustment differs across different personality types. The resilient group excelled at all dimensions, while the overcontrolled group scored lowest at all dimensions. The high-moderate group and the low-moderate group scored moderately, and the high-moderate group scored higher than the low-moderate group; (3) within the framework of the personal-environment fit models, the moderating effect of personality types has been verified, and the resilient group performed best.
Limitations
First of all, leisure satisfaction has possible effects on the psychosexual adjustment of adolescents, psychosexual adjustment may also in turn affect leisure satisfaction. For example, to a certain extent, more decent and more socially compliant interactions with others mean higher levels of contact satisfaction in leisure. Accordingly, we may need longitudinal studies to explore deeply the relationship between these two. In addition, there were certain geographical limitations concerning our research participants. Geographical differences could lead to huge differences in economic conditions, lifestyles, and ultimately differences in characteristics. Furthermore, we did not find the undercontrolled group and the reserved group in our study. Instead, we found that the moderate group could be divided into two types, which is different from previous studies. This is also one of the limitations of our research. For an accurate study of personality types, the sampling scope of participants may be expanded. Finally, gender is also a point of interest for our future research, for personality and gender may have mixed effects on psychosexual adjustment. If this variable had been added, our research could be more enriched.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee of Qingdao University. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author Contributions
XX: conceived and designed the survey. XW: performed the survey. YW and XW: analyzed the data. YW: contributed materials/analysis tools. XX and XW: wrote the paper and literature research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (No.19BKS087) awarded to XX.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara, G. V., and Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. J. Pers. 82, 340–353. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12065
Alley, J., and Strassberg, D. S. (2020). Sexual minorities’ psychosexual adjustment as reflected in the multidimensional sexuality questionnaire (MSQ). J. Bisexuality 20, 400–416. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2020.1820419
Arya, R., Patel, A. K., Shukla, N., and Gupta, K. (2019). Association between stress and sexual problems among married Indian males. Current Res. J. Soc. Sci. Human. 2:103. doi: 10.12944/CRJSSH.2.2.06
Asendorpf, J. B. (2006). Typeness of personality profiles: a continuous person-centred approach to personality data. Eur. J. Personal. 20, 83–106. doi: 10.1002/per.575
Asendorpf, B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., and Van Aken, M. A. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur. J. Personal. 15, 169–198. doi: 10.1002/per.408.abs
Atkins, R., and Hart, D. (2008). The under-controlled do it first: childhood personality and sexual debut. Res. Nurs. Health 31, 626–639. doi: 10.1002/nur.20288
Baeva, I. A., Zinchenko, Y. P., and Laptev, V. V. (2016). Psychological resources of modern Russian adolescents’ resilience to violence in the educational environment. Psychol. Russ. 9, 159–172. doi: 10.11621/pir.2016.0311
Bandura, A., and Walters, R. H. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barnett, M., Mcdonnell, G., Derosa, A., Schuler, T., Philip, E., Peterson, L., et al. (2016). Psychosocial outcomes and interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA): a systematic review. J. Cancer Surviv. 10, 814–831. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0527-6
Barrada, J. R., and Castro, Á. (2020). Tinder users: sociodemographic, psychological, and psychosexual characteristics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:8047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218047
Beard, J. G., and Ragheb, M. G. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. J. Leis. Res. 12, 20–33. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1980.11969416
Bigras, N., Godbout, N., and Briere, J. (2015). Child sexual abuse, sexual anxiety, and sexual satisfaction: The role of self-capacities. J. Child Sex Abus. 24, 464–483. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.1042184
Bingzheng, H., Chu, W., and Xing, L. (2010). Development of leisure satisfaction questionnaire for university students. Chin. J. Behav. Med. Brain Sci. 5, 30–42. doi: 10.46328/ijte.235
Block, J. H., and Block, J. (1980). “The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior,” in Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. ed. W. A. Collins (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 39–101.
Boyce, C. J., and Wood, A. M. (2011). Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1397–1402. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421790
Bradley, G. L., and Inglis, B. C. (2012). Adolescent leisure dimensions, psychosocial adjustment, and gender effects. J. Adolesc. 35, 1167–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.006
Brown, B. B., and Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. (eds.) W. Daom and N. Eisenberg, Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development 5th Edn. New York, NY: Wiley, 311–388
Chao, C. (2013). The relationship among leisure involvement, leisure benefits, and happiness of elementary schoolteachers in Tainan County. Int. Res. Educ. 1, 29–51. doi: 10.5296/ire.v1i1.3970
Cherven, B., Sampson, A., Bober, S. L., Bingen, K., Frederick, N., Freyer, D. R., et al. (2021). Sexual health among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a scoping review from the Children's oncology group adolescent and young adult oncology discipline committee. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 250–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21655
Chun, B., Roh, E. Y., Spralls Iii, S. A., and Cheng, C.-I. (2021). Personal growth leisure experience in Templestay: international tourist outcomes, satisfaction, and recommendation. J. Leis. Res. 52, 77–96. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2020.1746936
Clark, S. L. (2010). Mixture* Modeling With Behavioral Data. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Codish, D., and Ravid, G. (2015). Detecting playfulness in educational gamification through behavior patterns. IBM J. Res. Dev. 59, 1, 14–6. doi: 10.1147/JRD.2015.2459651
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Looking-glass self. The production of reality: Essays readings on social interaction. Teaching Sociology 30, 381–128. doi: 10.2307/3211489
Dadvand, P., Hariri, S., Abbasi, B., Heshmat, R., Qorbani, M., Motlagh, M. E., et al. (2019). Use of green spaces, self-satisfaction and social contacts in adolescents: a population-based CASPIAN-V study. Environ. Res. 168, 171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.033
Das, S., and Barman, P. (2019). Nature Of spending leisure time among the college students and its effects on their mental health. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev. 7, 896–910. doi: 10.18510/hssr.2019.75116
De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., and Widiger, T. A. (2009). Integrating a developmental perspective in dimensional models of personality disorders. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 29, 154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.002
De Clercq, B., Rettew, D., Althoff, R. R., and De Bolle, M. (2012). Childhood personality types: vulnerability and adaptation over time. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53, 716–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02512.x
Dekker, L. P., Van Der Vegt, E. J., Van Der Ende, J., Tick, N., Louwerse, A., Maras, A., et al. (2017). Psychosexual functioning of cognitively-able adolescents with autism spectrum disorder compared to typically developing peers: the development and testing of the teen transition inventory-a self-and parent report questionnaire on psychosexual functioning. J Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 1716–1738. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3071-y
Delevi, R., and Weisskirch, R. S. (2013). Personality factors as predictors of sexting. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 2589–2594. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.003
Denissen, J. J. A., Asendorpf, J. B., and Van Aken, M. A. G. (2008). Childhood personality predicts long-term trajectories of shyness and aggressiveness in the context of demographic transitions in emerging adulthood. J. Pers. 76, 67–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00480.x
Dwyer, A. A. (2020). Psychosexual effects resulting from delayed, incomplete, or absent puberty. Curr. Opin. Endocr. Metab. Res. 14, 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2020.04.003
Erango, M. A., and Ayka, Z. A. (2015). Psychosocial support and parents’ social life determine the self-esteem of orphan children. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 8, 169–173. doi: 10.2147/rmhp.S89473
Finch, H. (2015). A comparison of statistics for assessing model invariance in latent class analysis. Open J. Stat. 5:191, –210. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1363652
Freire, T., and Teixeira, A. (2018). The influence of leisure attitudes and leisure satisfaction on Adolescents’ positive functioning: the role of emotion regulation. Front. Psychol. 9:1349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01349
Frías, Á., González, L., Palma, C., and Farriols, N. (2017). Is there a relationship between borderline personality disorder and sexual masochism in women? Arch. Sex. Behav. 46, 747–754. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0834-z
Gilbert, K., Hall, K., and Codd, R. T. (2020). Radically open dialectical behavior therapy: social signaling, Transdiagnostic utility and current evidence. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 13, 19–28. doi: 10.2147/prbm.S201848
Granzin, K. L., and Haggard, L. M. (2000). “An integrative explanation for quality of life: development and test of a structural model,” in Advances in Quality of life Theory and Research ed. D. R. Rahtz (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 31–63.
Hashemi, S. G. S. (2020). Hypersexual behaviors and personality traits in men with substance use disorders in Iran. J. Psychosexual Health 2, 63–70. doi: 10.1177/2631831819898564
Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 120, 349–365. doi: 10.1177/0959353594043023
Hopkins, K. D., Shepherd, C. C. J., Taylor, C. L., and Zubrick, S. R. (2015). Relationships between psychosocial resilience and physical health status of Western Australian urban aboriginal youth. PLoS One 10:e0145382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145382
Iso-Ahola, S. E., and Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: conceptualization, reliability and validity of the leisure boredom scale. J. Leis. Res. 22, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1990.11969811
Jones, L., and Mccarthy, M. (2010). Mapping the landscape of gay men's football. Leis. Stud. 29, 161–173. doi: 10.1080/02614360903261487
Katz-Wise, S. L. (2015). Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychol. Sex. 6, 189–208. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2013.876445
Kim, J., Heo, J., and Lee, C. (2016a). Exploring the relationship between types of leisure activities and acculturation among Korean immigrants. Leis. Stud. 35, 113–127. doi: 10.1080/02614367.2015.1055295
Kim, J., and Jang, M. (2020). Stress, social support, and sexual adjustment in married female patients with breast cancer in Korea. Asia Pac. J. Oncol. Nurs. 7, 28–35. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_31_19
Kim, J., Kim, M., Malonebeach, E., and Han, A. (2016b). A study of health perception, disability acceptance, and life satisfaction based on types of leisure activity among Koreans with a physical disability. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 11, 791–804. doi: 10.1007/s11482-015-9397-8
Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scand. J. Psychol. 53, 512–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x
Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J. E., and Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006
Liu, H. (2014). Personality, leisure satisfaction, and subjective well-being of serious leisure participants. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 42, 1117–1125. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.7.1117
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., and Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 71, 543–562. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Magnusson, B., Crandall, A., and Evans, K. (2019). Early sexual debut and risky sex in young adults: the role of low self-control. BMC Public Health 19, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7734-9
Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., and Zarrett, N. (2009). “Adolescent Out-of school Activities,” in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. eds. R. Lerner and L. Steinberg (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 228–269.
Mansfield, L., Daykin, N., and Kay, T. (2020). Leisure and wellbeing. Leis. Stud. 39, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/02614367.2020.1713195
Miller, J. A., Caldwell, L. L., Weybright, E. H., Smith, E. A., Vergnani, T., and Wegner, L. (2014). Was bob Seger right? Relation between boredom in leisure and [risky] sex. Leis. Sci. 36, 52–67. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2014.860789
Miller, A. K., Wagner, M. M., and Hunt, A. N. (2012). Parsimony in personality: predicting sexual prejudice. J. Homosex. 59, 201–214. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2012.638550
Mock, S. E., Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., and Gerbasi, K. C. (2013). Deeper leisure involvement as a coping resource in a stigmatized leisure context. Leisure/Loisir. 37, 111–126. doi: 10.1080/14927713.2013.801152
Motamedi, M., Caldwell, L. L., Weybright, E. H., Jones, D., Wegner, L., and Smith, E. A. (2020). Doing a leisure activity because there is nothing else to do: related outcomes and intervention effects for adolescents. J. Leis. Res. 51, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2019.1590748
Munusturlar, M., and Argan, M. (2016). Development of the serious and casual leisure measure. World Leis. J. 58, 124–141. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2015.1126759
Ó Súilleabháin, P. S., Howard, S., and Hughes, B. M. (2018). Openness to experience and adapting to change: cardiovascular stress habituation to change in acute stress exposure. Psychophysiology 55:e13023. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13023
Outley, C. W., and Mckenzie, S. (2007). Older African American Women. Act. Adapt. Aging 31, 19–36. doi: 10.1300/J016v31n02_02
Parchomiuk, M. (2019). Sexuality of persons with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). Sex. Disabil. 37, 259–274. doi: 10.1007/s11195-018-9534-z
Park, S.-Y. (2009). Differences in leisure motivation, leisure restrictions and leisure satisfaction according to personality types. J. Korean Psychol. Assoc. Gen. 28, 343–362.
Park, S., Chiu, W., and Won, D. (2017). Effects of physical education, extracurricular sports activities, and leisure satisfaction on adolescent aggressive behavior: a latent growth modeling approach. PLoS One 12:e0174674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174674
Rettew, D. C., Althoff, R. R., Dumenci, L., Ayer, L., and Hudziak, J. J. (2008). Latent profiles of temperament and their relations to psychopathology and wellness. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 47, 273–281. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e318160b403
Rizzuto, I., Oehler, M., and Lalondrelle, S. (2021). Sexual and psychosexual consequences of treatment for gynaecological cancers. Clin. Oncol. 33, 602–607. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.07.003
Sa, Z., Tian, L., and Wang, X. (2021). Evidence for a comprehensive sexuality education intervention that enhances Chinese Adolescents’ sexual knowledge and gender awareness and empowers young women. Sex Roles 85, 357–370. doi: 10.1007/s11199-021-01223-8
Santini, Z. I., Meilstrup, C., Hinrichsen, C., Nielsen, L., Koyanagi, A., Koushede, V., et al. (2020). Associations between multiple leisure activities, mental health and substance use among adolescents in Denmark: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 14:232. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.593340
Sharp, E. H., Coffman, D. L., Caldwell, L. L., Smith, E. A., Wegner, L., Vergnani, T., et al. (2011). Predicting substance use behavior among south African adolescents: the role of leisure experiences across time. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 35, 343–351. doi: 10.1177/0165025411404494
Shin, K., and You, S. (2013). Leisure type, leisure satisfaction and adolescents’ psychological wellbeing. J. Pac. Rim Psychol. 7, 53–62. doi: 10.1017/prp.2013.6
Song, Y. (2015). The sexuality education and attitudes of college students in China. Health Educ. 115, 93–104. doi: 10.1108/he-01-2014-0002
Spaeth, M., Weichold, K., and Silbereisen, R. K. (2015). The development of leisure boredom in early adolescence: predictors and longitudinal associations with delinquency and depression. Dev Psychol. 51, 1380–1394. doi: 10.1037/a0039480
Sprankle, E. L. (2015). Psychosexual functioning and adjustment. In. Encyclo. Human Sex., 861–1042. doi: 10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs388
Stebbins, R. A. (2006). “Serious leisure,” in A Handbook of Leisure Studies. eds. C. Rojek, S. Shaw, and A. RVeal (Berlin: Springer).
Thompson, K. N., Betts, J., Jovev, M., Nyathi, Y., Mcdougall, E., and Chanen, A. M. (2019). Sexuality and sexual health among female youth with borderline personality disorder pathology. Early Interv. Psychiatry 13, 502–508. doi: 10.1111/eip.12510
Timonen, J., Niemelä, M., Hakko, H., Alakokkare, A., and Räsänen, S. (2021). Associations between adolescents’ social leisure activities and the onset of mental disorders in young adulthood. J. Youth Adolesc. 50, 1757–1765. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01462-8
Tokay Argan, M., and Mersin, S. (2021). Life satisfaction, life quality, and leisure satisfaction in health professionals. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 57, 660–666. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12592
Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F., and Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents’ problem behaviour. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 28, 210–220. doi: 10.1080/01650250344000424
Wang, W.-C. (2019). Exploring the relationship among free-time management, leisure boredom, and internet addiction in undergraduates in Taiwan. Psychol. Rep. 122, 1651–1665. doi: 10.1177/0033294118789034
Wang, M., Deng, X., and Du, X. (2018). Harsh parenting and academic achievement in Chinese adolescents: potential mediating roles of effortful control and classroom engagement. J. Sch. Psychol. 67, 16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.002
Weybright, E. H., Caldwell, L. L., Ram, N., Smith, E. A., and Wegner, L. (2015). Boredom prone or nothing to do? Distinguishing between state and trait leisure boredom and its association with substance use in south African adolescents. Leis. Sci. 37, 311–331. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1014530
Williams, D., Prior, E. E., and Vincent, J. (2020). Positive sexuality as a guide for leisure research and practice addressing sexual interests and behaviors. Leis. Sci. 42, 275–288. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1712276
Wilson, J. (1980). Sociology of leisure. Annual Review of Sociology 6, 21–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000321
Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., Sinco, B. R., and Hong, J. S. (2014). Contemporary heterosexism on campus and psychological distress among LGBQ students: the mediating role of self-acceptance. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 84, 519–529. doi: 10.1037/ort0000015
Yao, R., and Liang, L. (2010). Analysis of the application of simplified NEO-FFI to undergraduates. Chin. J. Clin. Psych. 18, 457–459. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2010.04.024
Yi, L., and Yong, Z. (2006). A preliminary study of puberty psychosexual health. Psychol. Sci. 3, 661–664. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2006.03.035
Zerengok, D., Guzel, P., and Ozbey, S. (2018). The impact of leisure participation on social adaptation of international students. J. Educ. Train. Stud. 6, 1–9. doi: 10.11114/jets.v6i2.2680
Keywords: personality, psychosexual adjustment, leisure satisfaction, latent profile analysis, college students
Citation: Xia X, Wang X and Wang Y (2022) Leisure Satisfaction, Personality, and Psychosexual Adjustment Among College Students: A Latent Profile Analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:895411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895411
Edited by:
Joana Carvalho, University of Porto, PortugalReviewed by:
Peter Adriaan Edelsbrunner, ETH Zürich, SwitzerlandOscar Cervilla, University of Granada, Spain
Reina Granados, University of Granada, Spain
Copyright © 2022 Xia, Wang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaotian Wang, WangXT1510@163.com