With the progress of media technology, the image world has turned from a two-dimensional plane to a three-dimensional, and the sense of immersion/“presence” (Sanchez-Vives and Slater, 2005), which is closely related to body perception, has become the most controversial topic in the media era (Geng, 2022). From Merleau- Ponty's pioneering philosophical thinking to the present (Merleau-Ponty, 1965), the relationship between body and space as the core of digital media constitutes one of the most worth exploring trends of human-computer interaction (Evans and Rzeszewski, 2020). The trauma film paradigm was developed to show movies depicting traumatic events to non-clinical participants to trigger a stress response similar to the response to traumatic events in real life (Speisman et al., 1964). Trauma movies usually consist of several clips, such as the scenes of car accidents and interpersonal violence. It has been proved that watching such movies with various scenes can reliably induce similar symptoms (Weidmann et al., 2009; James et al., 2016). Although the TFP can act as an analog of PTSD, inducing involuntary invasion, the participants are still “outsiders,” unable to completely immerse themselves in the film scenes and emotionally separated from the events (Lazarus et al., 1965; Koriat et al., 1972).
As early as 2015, Pauline Dibbets and others creatively realized that VR showed different effects in trauma induction compared with TFP. Therefore, Dibbets and their colleagues recruited 43 college students and divided them into two groups, with an average age of 22.16 years and 23.45 years, respectively (Dibbets and Schulte-Ostermann, 2015). They compared the VR paradigm with the traditional traumatic film (TFP) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
It is assumed that compared with TFP, PTSD caused by VR can make people immerse deeper, cause negative emotions and ruminate more strongly. However, the research results are quite the opposite. Compared with TFP, VR does not lead to more extreme changes in negative emotions or more (painful) invasions (Dibbets and Schulte-Ostermann, 2015). Such results are not typical. Generally speaking, the psychological and physiological activation in VR is generally high (Schweizer et al., 2018). Although the results need to be discussed, this experiment finally innovatively inspired us. The research contents of Dibbets are presented in tabular form, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Study target | Conclusion | The limitation of this study | Causes of limitations | Subsequent research |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative Emotion and Invasion Frequency | Both methods can induce traumatic memory, even if VR is not as good as TFP. | VR trauma induction time is short and invasion frequency is low. | To ensure that long-term PTSD symptoms are not induced. | Used the VR paradigm to detect avoidance behaviors in different people and environments specifically (Dibbets et al., 2021) |
| Risk factor 1: Imagination ability | Higher imagination coincides with more virtual reality conditions, higher ability leads to more intrusions (VR conditions), and higher ability is related to less invasion pain (TFP conditions). | There are fewer participants in each case. | This study is the first time used PTSD as an induction method. | Used the VR paradigm to induce intrusive emotions and avoidant behaviors, They found that the VR paradigm increased negative emotions and heart rate, decreased positive emotions and heart rate variability, and observed the symptoms that caused stress (Dibbets, 2020) |
| Risk factor 2: Trait anxiety | None | Participants are non-clinical people, so it isn't easy to popularize the results to clinical people. | For humanitarian reasons, we cannot induce negative emotions in clinical people. | |
| Risk factor 3: Depression | None | Questionnaire related to risk factors has a limited range of changes. | There is no pre-selected experimental participant. |
Comparison of research results.
Researchers are convinced that there are differences between TFP and VR paradigms. Generally speaking, VR quantifies the image scene into visible differences such as the number of details of physical injuries, the impact contrast of color differences, and so forth, which has higher imageability and can more effectively induce traumatic memory. TFP generally uses the lens perspective and close-up scenes of specific movie narratives, lacking subjective perspective switching ability and imagination space. Nevertheless, the actual research shows a contrary situation. The film paradigm seems to trigger a more robust stress response, which may be more similar to real-life trauma (Hilberdink et al., 2022). Moreover, the types of trauma (body, sex, traffic, disgust) caused by the themes of different films have different direct subjective and physiological responses (Arnaudova and Hagenaars, 2017). The film paradigm is an invasive memory caused by psychological trauma (Holmes and Bourne, 2008), even beyond the perspective of first-hand experience (James et al., 2016).
As this research is the first to use VR for trauma induction, it is limited by many conditions. For clinical and non-clinical people, different generalization mechanisms are individualized due to fear and anxiety (Kenntner-Mabiala et al., 2008) non-clinical people were taken as the experimental subjects in the experiment.
After that, the paradigm of PTSD induced by a series of movies and VR clips has been gradually improved, as shown in Table 1. The use of psychometrics can complement the paradigm to track physiological response and emotional regulation changes during PTSD (Yang et al., 2021).
In addition to VR being used as a way to induce traumatic memory for the first time, a series of ways to intervene in psychotherapy using VR technology has been gradually improved (Andreatta et al., 2010; Ready et al., 2010; Rizzo et al., 2011). For example, there are studies on VR cognitive rehabilitation training for clinical people (Jahn et al., 2021). A recent qualitative study emphasizes that VR in art therapy can bring positive experiences, such as positive emotions, games, and exploration (Hacmun et al., 2018, 2021; Kothgassner et al., 2019; Kaimal et al., 2020).
Although this study cannot prove that VR can induce PTSD more than traditional trauma movies, Pauline Dibbets et al.' s pioneering experiments prove that TFP and VR seem to be promising psychological intervention technology that deserves our continued exploration. Especially compared with the computer screen, VR has been proved to be more immersive (Visch et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2018; Jones, 2019; Pallavicini et al., 2019), and people can immerse themselves in a virtual environment and interact with it (Riva et al., 2007). VR contributes to a pleasant wake-up state because it brings a novel, intense and sensational experience (Bartsch et al., 2006; Bartsch and Viehoff, 2010), VR can be developed as an emotional medium to induce users' specific emotions. Factors such as hardware and software costs of VR should also be considered. Fortunately, with the growth of the VR commercial consumer market, we can see that the accessibility of VR software has increased, and the prices of VR equipment have decreased (Mishkind et al., 2017; Norr et al., 2018). On all accounts, using VR mobilizes the embodied perception of participants and highlights the importance of the body as a direct medium for feeling and contacting the external world (Human body perception from the inside out: Advances in visual cognition., 2006; Harris et al., 2015; Zahiu, 2020). Breaking through the previous mode of psychological intervention with visual media, Dibbets and his colleagues provided a convincing example of this kind of research and the future direction to explore.
Funding
This work was supported by Zhejiang Normal University.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AndreattaP. B.MaslowskiE.PettyS.ShimW.MarshM.HallT.et al. (2010). Virtual reality triage training provides a viable solution for disaster-preparedness. Acad. Emerg. Med.17, 870–876. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00728.x
2
ArnaudovaI.HagenaarsM. A. (2017). Lights … action: Comparison of trauma films for use in the trauma film paradigm. Behav. Res. Ther.93, 67–77. 10.1016/j.brat.2017.02.007
3
BartschA.MangoldR.ViehoffR.VordererP. (2006). Emotional gratifications during media use – An integrative approach. Eur. J. Commun. Res. 31, 261–278. 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.018
4
BartschA.ViehoffR. (2010). The use of media entertainment and emotional gratification. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci.5, 2247–2255. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.444
5
DibbetsP.. (2020). A novel virtual reality paradigm: Predictors for stress-related intrusions and avoidance behavior. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry67, 101449. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.01.001
6
DibbetsP.LemmensA.BenningR.SmeetsT. (2021). Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep.3, 100061. 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100061
7
DibbetsP.Schulte-OstermannM. A. (2015). Virtual reality, real emotions: a novel analogue for the assessment of risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder. Front. Psychol.6, 681. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00681
8
DingN.ZhouW.FungA. Y. (2018). Emotional effect of cinematic VR compared with traditional 2D film. Telemat. Inform.35, 1572–1579. 10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.003
9
EvansL.RzeszewskiM. (2020). Hermeneutic relations in VR: Immersion, embodiment, presence and HCI in VR gaming. Comp. Sci. 12211, 23–38. 10.1007/978-3-030-50164-8_2
10
GengY.. (2022). Virtual Reality (VR) advertising communication design based on 3D wireless active visual sensing. J. Sensors2022, 1551118. 10.1155/2022/1551118
11
HacmunI.RegevD.SalomonR. (2018). The principles of art therapy in virtual reality. Front. Psychol.9, 2082. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02082
12
HacmunI.RegevD.SalomonR. (2021). Artistic creation in virtual reality for art therapy: a qualitative study with expert art therapists. Arts Psychother.72, 101745. 10.1016/j.aip.2020.101745
13
HarrisL. R.CarnevaleM. J.D'AmourS.FraserL. E.HarrarV.HooverA. E. N.et al. (2015). How our body influences our perception of the world. Front. Psychol.6, 819. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00819
14
HilberdinkC. E.de RooijS. R.OlffM.BoschJ. A.van ZuidenM. (2022). Acute stress reactivity and intrusive memory development: a randomized trial using an adjusted trauma film paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology139, 105686. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105686
15
HolmesE. A.BourneC. (2008). Inducing and modulating intrusive emotional memories: A review of the trauma film paradigm. Acta Psychol.127, 553–566. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.002
16
Human body perception from the inside out: Advances in visual cognition. (2006). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
17
JahnF. S.SkovbyeM.ObenhausenK.JespersenA. E.MiskowiakK. W. (2021). Cognitive training with fully immersive virtual reality in patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res.300, 113928. 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113928
18
JamesE. L.Lau-ZhuA.ClarkI. A.VisserR. M.HagenaarsM. A.HolmesE. A. (2016). The trauma film paradigm as an experimental psychopathology model of psychological trauma: intrusive memories and beyond. Clin. Psychol. Rev.47, 106–142. 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.010
19
JonesS.. (2019). “Towards the essence of cinematic VR: embracing new technologies to define a medium,” in Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, (Springer), 321–335.
20
KaimalG.Carroll-HaskinsK.BerberianM.DoughertyA.CarltonN.RamakrishnanA. (2020). Virtual reality in art therapy: a pilot qualitative study of the novel medium and implications for practice. Art Ther.37, 16–24. 10.1080/07421656.2019.1659662
21
Kenntner-MabialaR.AndreattaM.WieserM. J.MühlbergerA.PauliP. (2008). Distinct effects of attention and affect on pain perception and somatosensory evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol.78, 114–122. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.01.007
22
KoriatA.MelkmanR.AverillJ. R.LazarusR. S. (1972). The self-control of emotional reactions to a stressful film 1. J. Pers.40, 601–619. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00083.x
23
KothgassnerO. D.GoreisA.KafkaJ. X.Van EickelsR. L.PlenerP. L.FelnhoferA. (2019). Virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol.10, 1654782. 10.1080/20008198.2019.1654782
24
LazarusR. S.Opton JrE.NomikosM. S.RankinN. O. (1965). The principle of short-circuiting of threat: further evidence. J. Pers.33, 622–35. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01408.x
25
Merleau-PontyM.. (1965). Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. New.
26
MishkindM. C.NorrA. M.KatzA. C.RegerG. M. (2017). Review of virtual reality treatment in psychiatry: evidence versus current diffusion and use. Curr. Psychiatry Rep.19, 1–8. 10.1007/s11920-017-0836-0
27
NorrA. M.SmolenskiD. J.KatzA. C.RizzoA. A.RothbaumB. O.DifedeJ.et al. (2018). Virtual reality exposure versus prolonged exposure for PTSD: Which treatment for whom?Depress Anxiety35, 523–529. 10.1002/da.22751
28
PallaviciniF.PepeA.MinissiM. E. (2019). Gaming in virtual reality: what changes in terms of usability, emotional response and sense of presence compared to non-immersive video games?Simul. Gaming50, 136–159. 10.1177/1046878119831420
29
ReadyD. J.GerardiR. J.BackscheiderA. G.MascaroN.RothbaumB. O. (2010). Comparing virtual reality exposure therapy to present-centered therapy with 11 US Vietnam veterans with PTSD. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.13, 49–54. 10.1089/cyber.2009.0239
30
RivaG.MantovaniF.CapidevilleC. S.PreziosaA.MorgantiF.VillaniD.et al. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychol. Behav.10, 45–56. 10.1089/cpb.2006.9993
31
RizzoA.ParsonsT. D.LangeB.KennyP.BuckwalterJ. G.RothbaumB.et al. (2011). Virtual reality goes to war: a brief review of the future of military behavioral healthcare. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings18, 176–187. 10.1007/s10880-011-9247-2
32
Sanchez-VivesM. V.SlaterM. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.6, 332–339. 10.1038/nrn1651
33
SchweizerT.RennerF.SunD.KleimB.HolmesE. A.Tuschen-CaffierB. (2018). Psychophysiological reactivity, coping behaviour and intrusive memories upon multisensory Virtual Reality and Script-Driven Imagery analogue trauma: a randomised controlled crossover study. J. Anxiety Disord.59, 42–52. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.005
34
SpeismanJ. C.LazarusR. S.DavisonL.MordkoffA. M. (1964). Experimental analysis of a film used as a threatening stimulus. J. Consult. Psychol.28, 23. 10.1037/h0047028
35
VischV. T.TanE. S.MolenaarD. (2010). The emotional and cognitive effect of immersion in film viewing. Cognit. Emot.24, 1439–1445. 10.1080/02699930903498186
36
WeidmannA.ConradiA.GrögerK.FehmL.FydrichT. (2009). Using stressful films to analyze risk factors for PTSD in analogue experimental studies – which film works best?Anxiety Stress Coping22, 549–569. 10.1080/10615800802541986
37
YangM.MadyN.LinnarantaO. (2021). Utility of psychophysiological metrics in guiding treatment of trauma symptoms: a systematic review. J. Behav. Cogn. Ther.31, 249–266. 10.1016/j.jbct.2021.01.004
38
ZahiuA.. (2020). I, avatar: Towards an extended theory of selfhood in immersive VR. Információs Társadalom19, 147–158. 10.22503/inftars.XIX.2019.4.10
Summary
Keywords
PTSD, VR, TFP, induced PTSD, trauma film paradigm
Citation
Shi Z (2022) Commentary: Virtual Reality, Real Emotions: A Novel Analogue for the Assessment of Risk Factors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Front. Psychol. 13:936930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936930
Received
05 May 2022
Accepted
17 May 2022
Published
09 June 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Weiguo Li, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Reviewed by
Yunrun Liu, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China; Yan Zhang, Hunan Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Shi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhongyu Shi szy2019@zjnu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.