Abstract
According to the WHO, globally, one in seven adolescents experiences a mental disorder, being in a detrimental situation toward educational achievement, social cohesion, future health and life chances. Calls to identify risk and resilience factors to develop effective preventive actions have been made. Following a systemic approach, we conducted a cross-sectional study on the relationship between social capital and psychological distress in a sample of Catalan adolescents in Barcelona, taking into account a range of other relevant aspects at different levels influencing mental health, including gender, age, migrant status, family background, lifestyle factors, body mass index, and self-rated health. Data were collected through validated questionnaires in December 2016 from 646 of 14- to 18-year-old adolescents from three public and private high schools in Barcelona (Spain). Data analysis included descriptive analysis, a correlational study and logistic regression to obtain the odds ratio for social capital indicators to be associated with psychological distress. Our results suggest that reporting higher levels of family support and higher levels of teacher-student trust reduce the likelihood of suffering psychological distress. Higher levels of neighborhood informal control were associated with mental health, but a possible detrimental effect cannot be ruled out. Being a girl, reporting low self-rated health or higher media use was also associated with higher likelihood of psychological distress. Current results may encourage interventions that focus on social capital as a means to reduce psychological distress and foster well-being in youth.
Introduction
According to the WHO, globally, one in seven adolescents experiences a mental disorder. Mental disorders account for 13% of the global burden of disease for adolescents and mood disorders are among the leading causes of disability (World Health Organization, 2022). Data from Spain echoes the global trends. The Spanish National Health Survey indicates that the prevalence of mental health and behavioral issues among children in 2017 was of 1 and 3% respectively, with these figures reaching 4 and 6.9% in 2021 (UNICEF, 2020; Perazzo Aragoneses et al., 2021). The COVID pandemic has taken an additional toll on youth mental health (Panchal et al., 2021; Racine et al., 2021). However a point has been made that the pandemic may have not created a new burden of disease, but actually exacerbated preexisting trends in the adolescent population (Hafstad and Augusti, 2021). Research shows that not all youth face the same risks. Adolescents in vulnerable contexts are more prone to develop mental health issues (World Health Organization, 2022), being put in a detrimental situation toward educational achievement, social cohesion, future health and life chances (Mathieson and Koller, 2006; Morgan, 2011; Gómez-López et al., 2019; World Health Organization, 2022).
Calls have been made to identify vulnerable groups and to develop effective preventive actions (Viner et al., 2012; Elgar and Currie, 2016; Panchal et al., 2021; Robinson et al., 2021; Thorisdottir et al., 2021). In this sense, Currie and Morgan (2020), drawing on Bronfenbrenner’s model of human development and data from the international Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study 1983–2020, conducted a scoping review to frame the evidence on the determinants of adolescent mental health across system levels.
At the Individual level, which has been the most researched one, sex/gender, migrant status, age, sexual orientation, adoption, and farm-living were identified as relevant for adolescent mental health. In general, boys reported better results than girls in several mental health indicators (Levin et al., 2009; Savoye et al., 2015). With regards to the migrant status, adolescents who themselves or their parents are not native, experience worse mental health. However, more detailed analysis seems to indicate that once differences in gender, age, family affluence and school environment are taken into account, differences due to immigrant status fade (Molcho et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2010). HBSC data for age is scarce, although a tendency that older adolescents are more likely to experience mental health issues can be identified which is consistent with other empirical evidence (Costa-Tutusaus and Guerra-Balic, 2016; Bullón et al., 2019) and with the general observation of adolescence being the stage of development where the majority of mental disorders emerge (De Girolamo et al., 2012).
Lifestyle factors and health-related behaviors have also been analyzed across various studies using HBSC data. Some of the results suggest that overweight is a strong predictor of psychosomatic complaints (Whitehead et al., 2017) and the correlation of obesity and high social media use with a lower self-rated life satisfaction and quality of life (Bullón et al., 2019; Baile et al., 2020). Sleep duration and difficulties to sleep have also been correlated with worse mental health (Vandendriessche et al., 2019). Inversely, physical activity and following a healthy dietary pattern, have been associated with better life satisfaction and self-esteem and better general mental health, respectively (Jacka et al., 2011; O’Neil et al., 2014; Khalid et al., 2016; Meyer et al., 2021). Some of the results suggest that overweight is a strong predictor of psychosomatic complaints (Whitehead et al., 2017), and a correlation between obesity and high social media use with a lower self-rated life satisfaction and quality of life (Bullón et al., 2019; Baile et al., 2020). Sleep duration and difficulties to sleep have also been correlated with worse mental Health (Vandendriessche et al., 2019). Inversely, physical activity and following a healthy dietary pattern, have been associated with better life satisfaction and self-esteem and better general mental health, respectively (Jacka et al., 2011; O’Neil et al., 2014; Khalid et al., 2016; Meyer et al., 2021).
Data from the HSBC study show that, at the Microsystem level, family and friends’ support and communication, family socioeconomic status, and the peer and school’s social environments are important predictors of adolescent mental health (Currie et al., 2004; Moreno et al., 2009; Freeman et al., 2012; Matos et al., 2014; Nielsen et al., 2015; Calmeiro et al., 2018; Moore et al., 2018; Inchley et al., 2020). Social capital in the community domain was also found to moderate the association between socioeconomic status and life satisfaction, internalizing and psychosomatic symptoms, and overall emotional wellbeing (Buijs et al., 2016). At the Macro level, inequality has been described as a driver of mental health disturbances for adolescents and adults (Currie et al., 2008; Pickett and Wilkinson, 2010; Currie and Morgan, 2020).
Overall, these data show how mental health in adolescents is the result of a complex intricacy of multiple factors. The more risk factors adolescents are exposed to, the greater the potential impact on their mental health. On the contrary, resilience factors can contribute to alleviate the effect of the negative ones. The aim of this study is to investigate social capital as an asset for adolescent mental health in sample high-school students in Barcelona (Spain). To do so, we mimic Novak and Kawachi’s study on social capital and mental health in Croatian adolescents.
Several definitions of social capital exist (Lochner et al., 1999; Paldam, 2000), which despite different nuances share the view that social capital can be an asset for societies in that it recognizes the importance of informal and formal networks in supporting individuals and communities through difficult times and increases their opportunities for improving and sustaining health through better access to information and resources (Ottejberg, 2005). A lifecourse perspective to social capital has been brought out to recognize that the social space and experience of children and adolescents differs from that of adults. For example, it has been posited that bonding social capital could be more important in the early stages of life, and that, especially in this period, social capital and social networks extend beyond the geographical limits (McPherson et al., 2013). In children and youth, social capital is typically assessed through a set of indicators that draw on Virginia Morrow’s qualitative work on youth social capital (Morrow, 1999), and include sense of belonging (identity and safety with local environments); autonomy and control (perceptions of power to influence community/institutional decisions); and social networking (participation in school and community life). Social capital is typically assessed either at the adolescent and parents’ level.
Social capital has been linked to a variety of outcomes in young people, ranging from risk behaviors, overweight, dietary habits, and physical activity (Singh et al., 2008; Duke et al., 2012; Singh and Ghandour, 2012; Nesbit et al., 2014; Novak et al., 2015, 2017). The study of social capital and health in adolescents do not only focus on physical aspects of health, but also on psychological ones (Yi et al., 2009; Han, 2012; Novak and Kawachi, 2015; Mohammadi et al., 2022). McPherson et al. (2013) undertook a review of studies to explore the relation of social capital and adolescent mental health and concluded that such relation existed for family and community-based social capital. To our knowledge, no data exist on Spanish populations.
Based on the former, we depart from the work by Novak and Kawachi (2015) and from the HSBC evidence collected by Currie and Morgan (2020) to conduct a cross-sectional study on the relationship between social capital and psychological distress in a sample of Catalan adolescents in Barcelona. With that aim, we consider a range of other relevant aspects at different system levels influencing mental health, including gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors (nutrition, physical activity, toxic habits, technological leisure, hygiene), body mass index (BMI), and self-rated health (SRH). In this way, we aim to identify risk and protective factors for psychological distress among Catalan adolescents.
Based on the literature reviewed, we hypothesize: (1) Lower family affluence, lower parental education, immigrant status of the adolescent and/or the family and female gender will be associated with higher levels of psychological distress; (2) Better lifestyle scores will correlate with lower levels of psychological distress; (3) Higher social capital scores will be associated with lower levels of psychological distress; (4) BMI higher than 25 kg/M2 will be associated with higher levels of psychological distress; (5) Good, very good or excellent SRH will be associated with lower levels of psychological distress.
Materials and methods
Design and participants
A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in a sample of 646 adolescents aged 14- to 18 years old from three public and private high schools in Barcelona (Spain). For the sample recruitment, all public high schools in Barcelona (n = 71) were emailed an invitation letter to participate in the study; also, several private schools (n = 5) were contacted through personal contacts of the research team. Finally, one public high-school and two private schools agreed to participate in the study.
Data collection and study variables
Data collection was performed in December 2016, in each high school, in a scheduled appointment by one or two members of the research team, who were always present during adolescents’ response, providing indications and solving doubts when needed. Participants were handed a folder that contained all data collection instruments and were allocated 40 min to answer them. Anonymity was preserved by not collecting any personally-identifying information.
The study had been approved by the Ethical Board Committee of Blanquerna School of Health Sciences and all eligible students and their parents were informed about the aim, procedure and data collection tools. Except eight eligible participants, all other returned the informed consent form signed by their parents and by themselves, therefore entering the study.
The participants responded to sociodemographic questions, which included gender (male or female), age, country of birth and parental country of birth, level of education for both parents and family wealth. Age was recorded by asking the participants’ birth month and year. Country of birth was grouped into autochthonous and otherwise, as it was parental country of birth (both parents autochthonous and otherwise). For each parent, participants provided the highest level of education achieved (no studies, primary school, compulsory secondary school, non-compulsory secondary school, vocational training, university studies) and responses were dichotomized considering vocational training, university studies as higher educational level.
Family wealth was assessed through the Family Affluence Scale (FAS III). The FAS III scale is the instrument used in the World Health Organization’s Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) study to assess socioeconomic position and provides a 0–9 score that is typically categorized into low affluence (0–2), middle affluence (3–5) and high affluence (6–9) for categorical analysis (Boyce et al., 2006). While it is reliability in high-income countries has been questioned due to the improvement of general living conditions in the last decades, recent analysis show that it is a valid measure to identify low-income families in such settings (Corell et al., 2021). In our analysis, responses 3–9 were grouped to dichotomize the variable into low family affluence (responses 0–2) and high family affluence (responses 3–9).
Outcome variable psychological distress was assessed through the KESSLER k-6 scale (Kessler et al., 2010). Previous studies have shown that the K6 is a reliable instrument able to detect mood and anxiety in adolescents (Green et al., 2010). The six items assess the frequency in which respondents felt nervous, hopeless, restless/fidgety, depressed that nothing could cheer them up, everything was an effort, and worthless. Each question is scored from 0 (None of the time) to 4 (All of the time). Scores of the 6 questions were then summed (0–24) with scores of 13 or higher indicating high levels of psychological distress.
Social capital in the family, school and neighborhood setting was measured with a 6-item multi-setting adapted scale on family, school and neighborhood social capital adapted from Furuta et al. (2012). Family support in school was assessed by the single item: “Do you feel your family understands and gives attention to you during high school?.” Neighborhood social capital was assessed by two items: “Do you feel people trust each other in your neighbourhood (neighbourhood trust)?”; “Do you feel that your neighbours step in to criticize deviant behavior among high school students (informal social control)?.” School social capital was assessed by three questions; “Do you feel teachers and students trust each other in your high school (teacher-student interpersonal trust)?”; “Do you feel students trust each other in your high school (student interpersonal trust)?”; “Do you feel students collaborate with each another in your high school (students’ collaboration in school)?.” The response options to all questions were on a 6-points Likert scale where 1 was “strongly disagree” and 6 “strongly agree.” Responses 1–3 and 4–6 were combined to create a dichotomous variable indicating low and high perceived social capital, respectively (Novak and Kawachi, 2015).
The VISA-TEEN questionnaire (Costa-Tutusaus and Guerra-Balic, 2016) was used to evaluate the lifestyle dimensions. This questionnaire evaluates overall lifestyle, as well as its sub-dimension nutrition [compliance with the Catalan 2012 Food-based dietary guidelines, plus water and other beverages’ intake], physical activity [weekly moderate and high intensity practice], use of technologic leisure [hours dedicated to social networks and electronic games, sleep hours], toxic habits [tobacco, alcohol and other drugs’ consumption] and hygiene [hands and teeth washing]. The total mark is 45, and each dimension’s score ranges from 0 to 3, with higher values indicating more alignment with health recommendations.
Self-rated health (SRH) was assessed using the standard single item question: “How do you perceive your health?” (Ware and Sherbourne, 1992). Possible responses ranged from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). Responses were dichotomized being scores 3–5 considered as “good SRH” and responses 1–2 “poor SRH” health. Body mass index (BMI) was used based on self-reported height and weight. Was stablished as a cut-off to discriminate respondents with and without overweight/obesity, based on the recommendations of the Spanish Association for the Study of Obesity (SEEDO, 2016).
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed with SPSS v21 (IBM, 2019) and included descriptive analysis, a correlational study and logistic regression to obtain the odds ratio for social capital indicators to be associated to psychological distress.
The first steps of the data analysis entailed the descriptive and correlational analyses. The preliminary tasks to these procedures correspond to the verification of the normal distribution for the dependent variables using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (none of our continuous variables showed a normal distribution); verification of variance homogeneity; and dichotomization of the dependent and predictor variables (except for age and lifestyle variables for which a cut-off score is not available and were therefore left in continuous mode). In all cases, 1 represented the values that are hypothesized to be associated with higher psychological distress (value 1 in the dichotomized K6 score as well).
In our study, all continuous variables were non-normal. Therefore, correlational analysis was conducted using Spearman Rank Correlation, which is an appropriate test when one or both variables are ordinal and/or normality assumptions are not met. We also compared the means for the dependent and social capital variables based on gender, parental level of studies, family affluence, and migrant status of both the adolescent and their parents in their dichotomized form using t-student test.
Using odds ratio to present the results is recommended when the study is interested in the impact of the independent variables, controlling for the effect of the others, as well as to prevent the full effect of the true impact of a unit change in independent variables on the outcome variable (Morgan and Teachman, 1988; DeMaris, 1995). The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of social capital variables in contributing to the dependent variable, psychological distress, controlling for the other analysis variables: gender, age, parental level of studies, family affluence, migrant status of the adolescent and their parents, BMI, SRH and lifestyle indicators. To include variables in the logistic regression model we used forward stepwise selection. Predicted probabilities of an event occurring were determined by Exp (B). For all study analysis, we consider a significance value of 0.05.
Results
Characteristics of the sample
The sample consisted of a total of 654 students, 345 male (52.7%) and 309 female (47.2%). 90.1% of the students were born in Spain. 33.38 were enrolled in compulsory secondary school, 47.25% in post-compulsory secondary school and 19.35% in different degrees of vocational training. Regarding parental education, university studies predominate (42.4% in the case of mothers, 35.7% in the case of fathers). 82.6% of mothers and 81.1% of fathers were native from Spain. Both parents were born in Spain for 78.7% of the sample. 70.1% of the sample was classified as having high family affluence, 25.3% as middle-income and 2.3% as low.
In terms of covariates, mean lifestyle scores ranged between 2.00 (SD = 0.50) for the dimension of nutrition and 2.48 (SD = 0.79) for the dimension of physical activity, except for technological leisure that obtained the lowest score with a 1.61 (SD = 0.67). 10% of the sample was overweight, and over 16% reported poor or very poor self-rated health. For social capital scores, the highest mean score was for family support (M = 4.3; SD 1.41), followed by student trust (M = 3.85; SD 1.31); teacher-student trust (M = 3.59; SD 1.33); neighborhood informal control (M = 3.08; SD 1.43); neighborhood trust (M = 2.97; SD1.41) and collaboration among students (M = 1.78; SD 1.25). Complete data on the sample characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Variable | Category | N (%) | Variable | Category | N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 345 (52.7) | Maternal level of studies | None | 10 (1.5) |
| Female | 309 (47.1) | Primary education | 23 (3.5) | ||
| Course | Compulsory Secondary school | 219 (33.38) | Compulsory secondary education | 86 (13.1) | |
| Post-compulsory secondary school | 310 (47.25) | Post-compulsory secondary education | 68 (10.4) | ||
| Vocational Training | 127 (19.35) | Vocational training | 176 (26.8) | ||
| SRH | Poor or very poor | 106 (16.2) | University studies | 278 (42.4) | |
| Fair. good or very good | 540 (82.3) | Paternal level of studies | None | 16 (2.5) | |
| Family wealth | Low | 15 (2.3) | Primary education | 28 (4.3) | |
| Middle | 166 (25.3) | Compulsory secondary education | 92 (14.0) | ||
| High | 460 (70.1) | Post-compulsory secondary education | 62 (9.5) | ||
| BMI | <25 | 547 (83.4) | Vocational training | 206 (31.4) | |
| > = 25 | 66 (10.1) | University studies | 234 (35.7) | ||
| Psychological distress | Yes | 156 (23.8) | |||
| No | 476 (72.6) | ||||
| Variable | X (SD) | Variable | X (SD) | ||
| Age | 15.72 (1.23) | Family support | 4.3 (1.41) | ||
| BMI | 21.23 (3.31) | Neighborhood trust | 2.97 (1.41) | ||
| Nutrition | 2.00 (0.50) | Neighborhood informal control | 3.08 (1.43) | ||
| Physical activity | 2.48 (0.79) | Teacher-student trust | 3.59 (1.33) | ||
| Hygiene | 2.36 (0.70) | Student trust | 3.85 (1.29) | ||
| Toxic habits | 2.52 (0.66) | Collaboration among students | 1.78 (1.25) | ||
| Technological leisure | 1.61 (0.67) | ||||
| Lifestyle | 33.29 (4.84) | ||||
Descriptive statistics of the sample.
Mean comparisons showed significant differences for K6 scores for family affluence, parental migrant status, and gender (Table 2). All social capital indicators showed significantly different scores based on the FAS scale except for neighborhood informal control. Native-born students obtained significantly higher scores on student-teacher trust, and those with families born outside Spain had lower scores on trust among students. Girls obtained lower scores in all SC indicators, but only differences in family support, neighborhood trust, teacher-student trust and trust among students were significant. Students whose mother’s had higher education (vocational training or university students) had significantly higher scores all social capital indicators except for neighborhood informal control. In the case of paternal education, differences for social capital indicators were only significant for neighborhood trust and student trust. Differences in psychological distress based on parental education were not significant.
Table 2
| Gender | Adolescent migrant status | Parental migrant status | Family wealth | Mother’s educational level | Father’s educational level | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girl (n = 309) | Boy (n = 346) | Migrant (n = 64) | Native (n = 591) | Migrant (n = 138) | Both Native (n = 516) | Low income (n = 460) | Middle-high income (n = 181) | Low (n = 187) | High (n = 454) | Low (n = 196) | High (n = 440) | |
| Family support | 4.16* | 4.43* | 4.02 | 4.33 | 3.85 | 4.31 | 3.97*** | 4.43*** | 4.24* | 4.34* | 4.25 | 2.36 |
| Neighborhood trust | 2.85* | 3.08* | 2.95 | 2.98 | 2.69 | 2.82 | 2.69** | 3.08** | 2.83* | 3.04* | 2.76* | 3.06* |
| Neighborhood informal control | 3.00 | 3.16 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.20 | 2.97 | 2.93 | 3.13 | 2.94 | 3.14 | 2.92 | 3.13 |
| Teacher-student trust | 3.47* | 3.69* | 3.87* | 3.56* | 3.63 | 3.82 | 3.41* | 3.64* | 3.38* | 3.66* | 3.48 | 3.65 |
| Student trust | 3.73* | 3.96* | 3.97 | 3.84 | 3.69* | 4.18* | 3.65* | 3.92* | 3.60** | 3.96** | 3.71* | 3.93* |
| Collaboration among students | 3.73 | 3.82 | 3.89 | 3.77 | 3.66 | 4.05 | 3.57* | 3.86* | 3.59* | 3.85* | 3.72 | 3.76 |
| Psychological distress | 10.54*** | 8.63*** | 10.07 | 9.48 | 10.94** | 8.52** | 9.14*** | 10.55*** | 9.88 | 9.35 | 9.79 | 9.30 |
Mean differences for psychological distress and social capital scores based on gender, adolescent and parental migrant status, family wealth and parental educational level.
p ≤ 0.5;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001.
Relationship between social capital and psychological distress
All social capital indicators significantly correlated with psychological distress in an inverse way (Table 3). The strongest association was for family support, and the lowest for neighborhood informal control. Psychological distress was also significantly associated with FAS, SRH and technological leisure. In terms of social capital indicators, family support was associated with FAS, SRH, BMI, technological leisure, and toxic habits; neighborhood trust with FAS, nutrition and technological leisure, neighborhood informal control with technological leisure, teacher-student trust with FAS, SRH, BMI, age and technological leisure, student trust was associated with age, and collaboration among students with age and physical activity.
Table 3
| Family support | Neighborhood trust | Neighborhood informal control | Teacher-student trust | Student trust | Collaboration among students | Psychological distress | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological distress | −0.311*** | −0.204*** | −0.113** | −0.207*** | −0.121** | −0.122** | |
| Family wealth | 0.152*** | 0.122** | 0.061 | 0.102* | 0.110** | 0.108* | −0.076* |
| Self-rated health | −0.193*** | −0.068 | −0.068 | −0.105* | −0.052 | −0.058 | 0.198** |
| Body Mass Index | −0.086* | −0.045 | −0.031 | −0.117** | −0.029 | −0.014 | 0.032 |
| Age | 0.066 | −0.022 | 0.047 | 0.092* | 0.122** | 0.133*** | −0.029 |
| Nutrition | 0.053 | 0.082* | 0.057 | −0.028 | 0.000 | 0.037 | 0.069 |
| Physical Activity | 0.017 | 0.073 | 0.034 | 0.035 | −0.016 | −0.104* | −0.046 |
| Technological leisure | 0.190*** | 0.099* | 0.080* | 0.104* | 0.022 | −0.019 | −0.162*** |
| Toxic Habits | 0.114** | 0.013 | −0.065 | 0.020 | −0.042 | −0.020 | −0.073 |
| Hygiene | 0.076 | 0.059 | 0.027 | 0.062 | −0.008 | 0.044 | 0.003 |
Results of the correlational analysis.
p ≤ 0.5;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001.
The association between social capital and psychological distress when considering the rest of covariates is shown in Table 4. In the overall model, high psychological distress was significantly inversely associated with three domains of social capital: family support (OR 3.483; 95% CI 2.035–5.961), neighborhood informal control (OR 1.809; 95% CI 1.025–3.192), and teacher-student trust (OR 1.950; 95% CI 1.163–3.272). In our sample, gender and the educational level of the father remained significantly associated with psychological distress. Girls were 3.198 times more likely to experience psychological distress (95% CI 1.887–5.420) and those adolescents whose father had not achieved higher education were 1.735 times more likely to experience psychological distress (95% CI 1.036–2.905).
Table 4
| Family SC | Neighborhood SC | School SC | All domains SC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||
| OR(CI) | OR(CI) | OR(CI) | OR(CI) | ||
| Family support | Low | 4.044 (2.393–6.835)*** | 3.483 (2.035–5.961)*** | ||
| High | |||||
| Neighborhood trust | Low | ||||
| High | |||||
| Neighborhood informal control | Low | 2.411 (1.401–4.150)** | 1.809 (1.025–3.192)* | ||
| High | |||||
| Teacher-student trust | Low | 2.374 (1.449–3.889)* | 1.950 (1.163–3-272)* | ||
| High | |||||
| Student trust | Low | ||||
| High | |||||
| Collaboration among students | Low | ||||
| High | |||||
| Gender | Girl | 3.079 (1.832–5.174)*** | 3.008 (1.814–4.990)*** | 2.797 (1.682–4.652)*** | 3.198(1.887–5.420)*** |
| Boy | |||||
| Self-rated health | Low | 0.496 (0.270–0.910)* | 0.371 (0.208–0.662)** | 0.430 (0.239–0.771)** | |
| High | |||||
| Paternal level of studies | Low | 1.735 (1.036–2.905)* | |||
| High | |||||
| Technological leisure | 0.687 (0.473–0.999)* |
Odds ratios for high psychological distress in the sample.
p ≤ 0.5;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.00.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Model 1. Association between gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors, BMI, SRH and family social capital.
Model 2. Association between gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors, BMI, SRH and neighborhood social capital.
Model 3. Association between gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors, BMI, SRH and school social capital.
Model 4. Association between gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors, BMI, SRH and all social capital variables.
Discussion
This is, to our knowledge, the first study to investigate the relationship between social capital and psychological distress in a sample of Catalan adolescents. Following the socio-ecological model of Bronfenbrenner, a range of other relevant aspects for mental health have been considered. Bronfenbrenner’s model understands childhood development as the result of a complex system of relationships affected by multiple levels including individual features and the surrounding layered environments, from immediate settings of family and school to broad cultural values, laws, and customs (Bronfenbrenner and Morris, 1998). In our study, gender, age, migrant status, parental migrant status, family affluence, parental educational level, lifestyle factors (nutrition, physical activity, toxic habits, technological leisure, hygiene), BMI, and SRH were considered when looking at the relation between aspects of social capital and psychological distress.
Our results suggest that the likelihood of suffering psychological distress is lower when reporting higher levels of family support or higher levels of teacher-student trust. In the complete model, higher levels of neighborhood informal control were also associated with our mental health indicator, but based on the CI range, adverse effects could not be ruled out (OR = 1.765, 95% CI: 0.998–3.121). These results are aligned with previous research observing that family relations offer a prominent protective role for youth’s mental health (Morgan and Haglund, 2009; Rothon et al., 2012; McPherson et al., 2013; Lindfors et al., 2017; Hirota et al., 2021).
In our study, family support was the strongest predictor of lower levels of psychological distress, with those reporting lower levels of family support having 3, 6 times more chances of mental hazards. Attempts to elucidate the mechanisms beneath this link include positive communication, norms shaping, the fact that time together prevents from other activities, an increased sense of belonging and a more secure attachment, and that closer relations with the parents allow them to identify signs of alarm. Indeed, families provide the ground for a healthy psychosocial functioning, including emotion processing, social competence, health beliefs and management, and adjustment of the stress-responsive biological regulatory systems, which are critical for mental health (Repetti et al., 2002; Zdanowicz et al., 2004, 2011; Kent and Bradshaw, 2021). The study of family social capital in relation to children’s wellbeing goes back to Coleman (1988, p: S111). However, more research on family social capital has been deemed necessary to better understand the role of social influences on overall and mental health (Rothon et al., 2012; Carrillo et al., 2017).
The result of teacher student-trust being significantly associated with lower odds of reporting psychological distress is consistent with another research on the field. Lindfors et al. (2017) found out that school social capital conceptualized as the positive and supportive relationships between students and teachers predicted lower school burnout in Finish high-school students. School bonding was also negatively associated with severe mood and behavior disorders in US adolescents (Hirota et al., 2021). The school environment has been found to be critical for students to develop confidence, a sense of efficacy, and a positive sense of community (Te Wang et al., 2013; Krane et al., 2016; Aldridge and McChesney, 2018). Explanations for these associations rely on psychological theories such as the attachment theory by Bowlby or the developmental systems theory of Bronfenbrenner (Sabol and Pianta, 2012).
Our study is not the first one to observe a possible detrimental effect of high informal control in the neighborhoods on mental health outcomes (Murayama et al., 2015; Novak et al., 2015; Ferlander et al., 2016). Villalonga-Olives and Kawachi (2017) extensively wrote about the dark side of social capital, something that had been previously addressed by authors like Portes and Landolt (1996) or Campos-Matos et al. (2016). Informal social control refers to the role of members of a community in stepping in to prevent the occurrence of “deviant” behaviors. As such, it can result in excessive demands by the members of tightly knit groups, restrictions on individual freedom, exclusion of out-group members, and the disregard of members’ aspirations (Villalonga-Olives and Kawachi, 2017).
Based on the literature reviewed, we had also hypothesized that lower family affluence, lower parental education, immigrant status of the adolescent and/or the family and female gender would be associated with higher levels of psychological distress. In the present study only gender and paternal level of education remained significant in the final model. These results compare to previous research highlighting the importance of family background in terms of migrant status (Delaruelle et al., 2021) and wealth (Currie et al., 2004; Inchley et al., 2020). Nevertheless, as those authors point out, such associations are tightly interrelated and need to be understood in an ecological manner in such a way that the composition of the sample in terms of level of parental background and family experiences may blur or accentuate these differences.
Using data of the Spanish Health Survey, Sonego et al. (2013) researched the influence of parental education on children and adolescent mental health. Their results showed a strong association between both variables during childhood, which outweighed the effect of other determinants such as income or parental occupation, but this association faded as age increased. The “equalizing” effect of adolescence has been previously described (West, 1997). The authors beg caution at interpreting that adolescence removes the effect of detrimental conditions during childhood arguing that the increase of other contexts’ importance (peers, school, community) may dilute the effect of the parental variables, but not erase it. Substantial research backs the lasting effect of childhood living circumstances (Goodman et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2021). Analysis on a subsample of the Somego et al. study, for which specific data was available, seemed to indicate that mental health outcomes were better for those youth in families where both parents devoted themselves to childcare and the percentage of this type of family increases with parental educational level. This appreciation would reinforce our finding of family social capital as the strongest predictor of mental health in adolescents.
Despite gender information was collected in our study in a binary form, omitting other possible gender identities that may be relevant for mental health (Aparicio-García et al., 2018; Chew et al., 2020; de Graaf et al., 2021), our results indicate that gender greatly influences the odds of suffering ill mental health. The gender gap in mental health has been widely described. Campbell et al. (2021) compared data from 78 countries concluding that girls do worse than boys worldwide despite the sociocultural differences across nations. Possible explanations included the excessive social demands to girls, the existence of sometimes contradictory gender norms (i.e., being femininely attractive, being high achieving, and being “one of the boys”), aesthetic and body image issues and inherent differences in personal characteristics such as self-esteem, stress coping, support seeking and emotional regulation (Bolognini et al., 1996; Smolak, 2004; Eschenbeck et al., 2007; Plaesu, 2011; Piko, 2017).
In terms of lifestyle, we anticipated that better scores in the five evaluated dimensions would correlate with lower levels of psychological distress. However, no dimension remained significantly associated to mental health in the final model. Better SRH was also associated with lower psychological distress. It has been argued that SRH represents an irreplaceable dimension of health status, capturing a myriad of factors that not only represent the subjective experience of a person’s wellbeing, but also is an independent predictor of mortality (Idler and Benyamini, 1997; Waller, 2015). Several studies demonstrate that mental health and SRH are closely linked, and their relation has been studied in both directions (SRH as an influence for mental health, and vice versa; Wade and Vingilis, 1999; Lachytova et al., 2017; Craig et al., 2018). In our case, being both measures subjective and self-reported it is possible that other individual characteristics such as personality, self-concept or self-esteem may influence this association (Vingilis et al., 2002; Arsandaux et al., 2019).
Our results stress the fact that influences on adolescent mental health are multiple and interact to each other in a synergic but not decisive way. Additionally, our results need to account for some limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow to establish causation nor rule-out reverse causation (i.e., having mental health issues promote lower levels of social capital). Second, we have obtained the data from a convenience sampling strategy that may have hindered those from detrimental contexts to participate in the study. Only around 15–20% of the sample belonged to low-income families, had a migrant background or parents had only compulsory education. Third, all our measures are subjective, therefore the possibility of personal bias in the data exist. Fourth, there is no gold standard in the measurement of social capital. We have used a limited selection of social capital indicators from different domains, and discrepancies with other evidence may be the result of a different operationalization of such social capital indicators. Importantly, we have not explicitly considered the influence of online social capital, which is increasingly being recognized as an important source of social capital, particularly for the younger generations. Last, our analysis does not account for personal or family data on mental health or relevant psychological information that can enhance current results such as family dynamics, personality, or coping styles. However, we offer a systemic view of risk and protective factors for adolescent mental health, with a special focus on social capital. Moreover, we frame our research in a robust framework, which has been identified as necessary in the field (McPherson et al., 2013).
Conclusion
The recent increase in mental health problems in youth have emphasized the need to identify risk and resilience factors that can contribute to operationalize programs and policies to prevent mental health burdens in this population. Our findings add to the existing body of literature by providing more evidence on the role that social capital can play in the promotion of mental health for adolescents and may encourage interventions. Social capital in the family domain appears to be of particular relevance, with the school and neighborhood environment also playing a role. Social capital is not something tangible that can be acted upon. Rather, actions need to be addressed to components of social capital such as social interaction, interconnectedness, trust or social norms, or to other elements of the system that can condition those (Eriksson, 2011; Ungar, 2011; Villalonga-Olives et al., 2018). Examples of such actions in the family area include interventions directed to promote positive parenting skills or to build parental social capital, like educational and support programs and community dynamization, but also more structural actions like conciliation measures. Actions in the school setting could involve the inclusion in the school educational plan of measures that foster teacher-student relationship, like small group spaces or the implementation of tutorship programs, especially for those in most vulnerable positions.
Funding
This project was funded by an APR grant by the Blanquerna School of Health Sciences 2015–16.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethical Board Committee of Blanquerna School of Health Sciences. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants, the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin and the school board.
Author contributions
EC-A, LC-T, MG-B, DN, and JR-R: conception or design of the work. EC-A, LC-T, and MG-B: data collection. EC-A, AA, and LC-T: data analysis and interpretation. EC-A: drafting the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank the high-schools, families and adolescents that have participated in this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AldridgeJ. M.McChesneyK. (2018). The relationships between school climate and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Educ. Res.88, 121–145. doi: 10.1016/J.IJER.2018.01.012
2
Aparicio-GarcíaM. E.Díaz-RamiroE. M.Rubio-ValdehitaS.López-NúñezM. I.García-NietoI. (2018). Health and well-being of cisgender, transgender and non-binary young people. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health15, 2133. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH15102133
3
ArsandauxJ.MichelG.TournierM.TzourioC.GaléraC. (2019). Is self-esteem associated with self-rated health among French college students? A longitudinal epidemiological study: the i-Share cohort. BMJ Open9:e024500. doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-024500
4
BaileJ. I.GuevaraR. M.González-CalderónM. J.UrchagaJ. D. (2020). The relationship between weight status, health-related quality of life, and life satisfaction in a sample of Spanish adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17, 3106. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH17093106
5
BologniniM.PlancherelB.BettschartW.HalfonO. (1996). Self-esteem and mental health in early adolescence: development and gender differences. J. Adolesc.19, 233–245. doi: 10.1006/JADO.1996.0022
6
BoyceW.TorsheimT.CurrieC.ZambonA. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc. Indic. Res.78, 473–487. doi: 10.1007/S11205-005-1607-6
7
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. (1998). “The ecology of developmental processes,” in Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. eds. DamonW.LernerR. (United States: Wiley & Sons Inc.), 993–1028.
8
BuijsT.MaesL.SalonnaF.Van DammeJ.HubletA.KebzaV.et al. (2016). The role of community social capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and adolescent life satisfaction: mediating or moderating? Evidence from Czech data. Int. J. Equity Health15, 203–212. doi: 10.1186/S12939-016-0490-X
9
BullónF. F.ValverdeB. B.del BarcoB. L.CastañoE. F. (2019). Mental health in Spanish adolescents according contextual variables and hours of internet use. Universitas Psychologica18, 1–12. doi: 10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY18-2.SMAE
10
CalmeiroL.CamachoI.de MatosM. G. (2018). Life satisfaction in adolescents: the role of individual and social health assets. Span. J. Psychol.21, E23. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2018.24
11
CampbellO. L. K.BannD.PatalayP. (2021). The gender gap in adolescent mental health: a cross-national investigation of 566, 829 adolescents across 73 countries. SSM-Population Health13:100742. doi: 10.1016/J.SSMPH.2021.100742
12
Campos-MatosI.SubramanianS. V.KawachiI. (2016). The ‘dark side’ of social capital: trust and self-rated health in European countries. Eur. J. Pub. Health26, 90–95. doi: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKV089
13
CarrilloE.KawachiI.RieraJ.AlvarezE. C.KawachiI.RomaniJ. R. (2017). Family social capital and health: a systematic review and redirection. Soc. Health and Illness39, 5–29. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12506
14
ChewD.TollitM. A.PoulakisZ.ZwicklS.CheungA. S.PangK. C. (2020). Youths with a non-binary gender identity: a review of their sociodemographic and clinical profile. The Lancet. Child & Adoles. Health4, 322–330. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30403-1
15
ColemanJ. S. P. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol.94, S95–S120. doi: 10.1086/228943
16
CorellM.ChenY.FribergP.PetzoldM.LöfstedtP. (2021). Does the family affluence scale reflect actual parental earned income, level of education and occupational status? A validation study using register data in Sweden. BMC Public Health21, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/S12889-021-11968-2/FIGURES/2
17
Costa-TutusausL.Guerra-BalicM. (2016). Relationship between healthy lifestyle and sociodemographic factors in adolescents in Catalonia: application of VISA-TEEN questionnaire. PloS One11, e0163381. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0163381
18
CraigB. A.MortonD. P.MoreyP. J.KentL. M.GaneA. B.ButlerT. L.et al. (2018). The association between self-rated health and social environments, health behaviors and health outcomes: a structural equation analysis. BMC Public Health18, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/S12889-018-5323-Y/FIGURES/3
19
CurrieC.MolchoM.BoyceW.HolsteinB.TorsheimT.RichterM. (2008). Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Soc. Sci. Med.66, 1429–1436. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2007.11.024
20
CurrieC.MorganA. (2020). A bio-ecological framing of evidence on the determinants of adolescent mental health - A scoping review of the international health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study 1983–2020. SSM-Population Health12:100697. doi: 10.1016/J.SSMPH.2020.100697
21
CurrieC.RobertsC.SettertobulteW.MorganA. (2004). Young people’s health in context: health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2001/2002 survey. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107560
22
De GirolamoG.DaganiJ.PurcellR.CocchiA.McGorryP. D. (2012). Age of onset of mental disorders and use of mental health services: needs, opportunities and obstacles. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci.21, 47–57. doi: 10.1017/S2045796011000746
23
de GraafN. M.HuismanB.Cohen-KettenisP. T.TwistJ.HageK.CarmichaelP.et al. (2021). Psychological functioning in non-binary identifying adolescents and adults. J. Sex Marital Ther.47, 773–784. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2021.1950087
24
DelaruelleK.WalshS. D.DierckensM.DeforcheB.KernM. R.CurrieC.et al. (2021). Mental health in adolescents with a migration background in 29 European countries: the buffering role of social capital. J. Youth Adolesc.50, 855–871. doi: 10.1007/S10964-021-01423-1/FIGURES/2
25
DeMarisA. (1995). A tutorial in logistic regression. J. Marriage Fam.57, 956–968. doi: 10.2307/353415
26
DukeN. N.BorowskyI. W.PettingellS. L. (2012). Parent perceptions of neighborhood: relationships with US youth physical activity and weight status. Matern. Child Health J.16, 149–157. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0731-3
27
ElgarF. J.CurrieC. (2016). Early-life exposure to income inequality and adolescent health and well-being: evidence from the health behaviour in school-aged children study. Working paper no. 2016-07.
28
ErikssonM. (2011). Social capital and health--implications for health promotion. Glob. Health Action4, 5611. doi: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.5611
29
EschenbeckH.KohlmannC. W.LohausA. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. J. Individ. Differ.28, 18–26. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18
30
FerlanderS.StickleyA.KislitsynaO.JukkalaT.CarlsonP.MäkinenI. H. (2016). Social capital-a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow. BMC Psychology4, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/S40359-016-0144-1/TABLES/3
31
FreemanJ. G.SamdalO.BăbanA.BancilaD. (2012). The relationship between school perceptions and psychosomatic complaints: cross-country differences across Canada, Norway, and Romania. Sch. Ment. Heal.4, 95–104. doi: 10.1007/S12310-011-9070-9/TABLES/3
32
FurutaM.EkuniD.TakaoS.SuzukiE.MoritaM.KawachiI. (2012). Social capital and self-rated oral health among young people. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.40, 97–104. doi: 10.1111/J.1600-0528.2011.00642.X
33
Gómez-LópezM.ViejoC.Ortega-RuizR. (2019). Psychological well-being during adolescence: stability and association with romantic relationships. Front. Psychol.10:1772. doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01772
34
GoodmanA.JoyceR.SmithJ. P. (2011). The long shadow cast by childhood physical and mental problems on adult life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 6032–6037. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1016970108
35
GreenJ. G.GruberM. J.SampsonN. A.ZaslavskyA. M.KesslerR. C. (2010). Improving the K6 short scale to predict serious emotional disturbance in adolescents in the USA. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res.19, 23–35. doi: 10.1002/MPR.314
36
HafstadG. S.AugustiE. M. (2021). A lost generation? COVID-19 and adolescent mental health. Lancet Psychiatry8, 640–641. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00179-6
37
HanY. (2012). Mental health and health-risk behaviors in adolescence: an examination of social relationships. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
38
HirotaT.PaksarianD.HeJ.-P.InoueS.StappE. K.Van MeterA.et al. (2021). Associations of social capital with mental disorder prevalence, severity, and comorbidity among U.S. Adolescents. J. Clin. Child. Adolesc. Psychol.1–12. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2021.1875326 [Epub ahead of print].
39
IBM (2019). SPSS software|IBM. In IBM website.
40
IdlerE. L.BenyaminiY. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J. Health Soc. Behav.38, 21–37. doi: 10.2307/2955359
41
InchleyJ.CurrieD.BudisavljevicS.TorsheimT.JåstadA.CosmaA.et al. (2020). Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017. Health behaviour in school-aged children. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332104
42
JackaF. N.KremerP. J.BerkM.de Silva-SanigorskiA. M.MoodieM.LeslieE. R.et al. (2011). A prospective study of diet quality and mental health in adolescents. PLoS One6:e24805. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0024805
43
KentB. V.BradshawM. (2021). Adolescent context and depressive symptom trajectories in a national sample: ages 13 to 34. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict.19, 1468–1484. doi: 10.1007/S11469-020-00236-W
44
KesslerR. C.GreenJ. G.GruberM. J.SampsonN. A.BrometE.CuitanM.et al. (2010). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res.19, 4–22. doi: 10.1002/mpr.310
45
KhalidS.WilliamsC. M.ReynoldsS. A. (2016). Is there an association between diet and depression in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br. J. Nutr.116, 2097–2108. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516004359
46
KraneV.KarlssonB. E.NessO.KimH. S. (2016). Teacher–student relationship, student mental health, and dropout from upper secondary school: a literature review. Scandinavian. Psychol. Forsch.3:E11. doi: 10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.3.E11
47
LachytovaM.KatreniakovaZ.MikulaP.JendrichovskyM.NagyovaI. (2017). Associations between self-rated health, mental health problems and physical inactivity among urban adolescents. Eur. J. Pub. Health27, 984–989. doi: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKX051
48
LeeH.ChoiK. W.WaiteL. J. (2021). Childhood background measures and their associations with later-life physical, mental, and social health in the national social life, health, and aging project. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.76, S335–S347. doi: 10.1093/GERONB/GBAB167
49
LevinK. A.CurrieC.MuldoonJ. (2009). Mental well-being and subjective health of 11- to 15-year-old boys and girls in Scotland, 1994-2006. Eur. J. Pub. Health19, 605–610. doi: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKP046
50
LindforsP.MinkkinenJ.RimpeläA.HotulainenR. (2017). Family and school social capital, school burnout and academic achievement: a multilevel longitudinal analysis among Finnish pupils. Inter. J. Adols. Youth.23, 368–381. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2017.1389758
51
LochnerK.KawachiI.KennedyB. P. (1999). Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place5, 259–270. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(99)00016-7
52
MathiesonA.KollerT. (2006). Addressing the socioeconomic determinants of healthy eating habits and physical activity levels among adolescents. WHO/HBSC FORUM 2006. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107356/e89375.pdf?sequence=1
53
MatosM. G.DaddsM. R.BarrettP. M. (2014). Family-related school issues and the mental health of adolescents: post-hoc analyses of the Portuguese national health behaviour in school-aged children survey data 1. J. Fam. Stud.12, 261–275. doi: 10.5172/JFS.327.12.2.261
54
McPhersonK. E.KerrS.McGeeE.MorganA.CheaterF. M.McLeanJ.et al. (2013). The association between family and community social capital and health risk behaviours in young people: an integrative review. BMC Public Health13:971. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-971
55
MeyerS.WeidmannR.GrobA. (2021). The mirror’s curse: weight perceptions mediate the link between physical activity and life satisfaction among 727, 865 teens in 44 countries. J. Sport Health Sci.10, 48–54. doi: 10.1016/J.JSHS.2020.01.002
56
MohammadiM. R.BadrfamR.ZandifarA.AhmadiN.KhaleghiA.HooshyariZ.et al. (2022). Social capital of parents of children and adolescents and its relation to psychiatric disorders: a population-based study. Community Ment. Health J.58, 1157–1167. doi: 10.1007/S10597-021-00926-2
57
MolchoM.CristiniF.GabhainnS. N.SantinelloM.MorenoC.MatosM. G.et al. (2010). Health and well-being among child immigrants in Europe. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Health-and-well-being-among-child-immigrants-in-Molcho-Cristini/033b1cd0a32cf1b88ed370c4b0ffd6138fa65816
58
MooreG. F.CoxR.EvansR. E.HallingbergB.HawkinsJ.LittlecottH. J.et al. (2018). school, peer and family relationships and adolescent substance use, subjective wellbeing and mental health symptoms in wales: a cross sectional study. Child Indic. Res.11, 1951–1965. doi: 10.1007/S12187-017-9524-1
59
MorenoC.Sánchez-QueijaI.Muñoz-TinocoV.de MatosM. G.DallagoL.BogtT.Teret al. (2009). Cross-national associations between parent and peer communication and psychological complaints. Int. J. Public Health, 54, 235–242. doi:10.1007/S00038-009-5415-7
60
MorganA. (2011). Social capital as a health asset for young people’s health and wellbeing: definitions, measurement, and theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Karolinska Institutet: Sweden.
61
MorganA.HaglundB. J. A. O. J. A. (2009). Social capital does matter for adolescent health: evidence from the English HBSC study. Health Promot. Int.24, 363–372. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap028
62
MorganS. P.TeachmanJ. D. (1988). Logistic regression: description, examples, and comparisons. J. Marriage Fam.50:929. doi: 10.2307/352104
63
MorrowV. (1999). Conceptualising social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: a critical review. Sociol. Rev.47, 744–765. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00194
64
MurayamaH.NofujiY.MatsuoE.NishiM.TaniguchiY.FujiwaraY.et al. (2015). Are neighborhood bonding and bridging social capital protective against depressive mood in old age? A multilevel analysis in Japan. Soc. Sci. Med.124, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2014.11.042
65
NesbitK. C.KolobeT. H.SissonS. B.GhementI. R. (2014). A model of environmental correlates of adolescent obesity in the United States. J. Adolesc. Health55, 394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.02.022
66
NielsenL.KoushedeV.Vinther-LarsenM.BendtsenP.ErsbøllA. K.DueP.et al. (2015). Does school social capital modify socioeconomic inequality in mental health? A multi-level analysis in Danish schools. Soc. Sci. Med.140, 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.002
67
NovakD.KawachiI. (2015). Influence of different domains of social capital on psychological distress among Croatian high school students. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Syst.9, 18. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0010-1
68
NovakD.ŠtefanL.ProsoliR.EmeljanovasA.MiezieneB.MilanovićI.et al. (2017). Mediterranean diet and its correlates among adolescents in non-mediterranean European countries: a population-based study. Nutrients9:177. doi: 10.3390/nu9020177
69
NovakD.SuzukiE.KawachiI. (2015). Are family, neighbourhood and school social capital associated with higher self-rated health among Croatian high school students? A population-based study. BMJ Open5:e007184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007184
70
O’NeilA.QuirkS. E.HousdenS.BrennanS. L.WilliamsL. J.PascoJ. A.et al. (2014). Relationship between diet and mental health in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Am. J. Public Health104, e31–e42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302110
71
OttejbergL. (2005). Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam on Social capital. Applications in literature and implications for publci health policy and practice [Karolinska Institutet]. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/15458832/bourdieu-coleman-and-putnam-on-social-capital
72
PaldamM. (2000). Social capital: one or many? definition and measurement. J. Econ. Surv.14, 629–653. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00127
73
PanchalU.Salazar de PabloG.FrancoM.MorenoC.ParelladaM.ArangoC.et al. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry1, 1–27. doi: 10.1007/S00787-021-01856-W/FIGURES/2
74
Perazzo AragonesesC.Elu TeránA.AumaitreA.CostasE.SánchezM.Taberner Judit VallP.et al. (2021). Crecer Saludable (mente). Un análisis sobre la salud mental y el suicidio en la infancia y la adolescencia. Available at: https://www.savethechildren.es/actualidad/informe-crecer-saludablemente-analisis-sobre-la-salud-mental-y-el-suicidio-en-la
75
PickettK. E.WilkinsonR. G. (2010). Inequality: an underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. Br. J. Psychiatry197, 426–428. doi: 10.1192/BJP.BP.109.072066
76
PikoB. (2017). Gender differences and similarities in adolescents’ ways of coping. The Psychol. Record 200151, 223–235. doi: 10.1007/BF03395396
77
PlaesuA. (2011). Community based migration strategies of young Romanians. Annales. Series historia et sociologia, letnik 21, številka 2, str. 275–284. Available at: http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-KA7TBMBR
78
PortesA.LandoltP. (1996). The downside of social capital. Am Prospect. 26, 18–22.
79
RacineN.McArthurB. A.CookeJ. E.EirichR.ZhuJ.MadiganS. (2021). Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr.175, 1142–1150. doi: 10.1001/JAMAPEDIATRICS.2021.2482
80
RepettiR. L.TaylorS. E.SeemanT. E. (2002). Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol. Bull.128, 330–366. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.330
81
RobinsonE.SutinA. R.DalyM.JonesA. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Rxiv2021, 04.21252921. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.04.21252921
82
RothonC.GoodwinL.StansfeldS. (2012). Family social support, community “social capital” and adolescents’ mental health and educational outcomes: a longitudinal study in England. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.47, 697–709. doi: 10.1007/S00127-011-0391-7/TABLES/5
83
SabolT. J.PiantaR. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attach Hum. Dev.14, 213–231. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672262
84
SavoyeI.MoreauN.BraultM. C.LevêqueA.GodinI. (2015). Well-being, gender, and psychological health in school-aged children. Archives of Public Health = Archives Belges de. Sante Publique73, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/S13690-015-0104-X
85
SEEDO (2016). Consenso SEEDO 2016. Available at: http: //demo. seedo.es/images/site/Consenso SEEDO 2016.pdf
86
SinghG. K.GhandourR. M. (2012). Impact of neighborhood social conditions and household socioeconomic status on behavioral problems among US children. Matern. Child Health J.16, S158–S169. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1005-z
87
SinghG. K.KoganM. D.Van DyckP. C. (2008). A multilevel analysis of state and regional disparities in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States. J. Community Health33, 90–102. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9071-7
88
SmolakL. (2004). Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here?Body Image1, 15–28. doi: 10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00008-1
89
SonegoM.LlácerA.GalánI.SimónF. (2013). The influence of parental education on child mental health in Spain. Qual. Life Res.22, 203–211. doi: 10.1007/S11136-012-0130-X/TABLES/3
90
WangM.TeBrinkworthM.EcclesJ. S. (2013). Moderating effects of teacher-student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Dev. Psychol., 49, 690–705. doi:10.1037/A0027916
91
ThorisdottirI. E.AsgeirsdottirB. B.KristjanssonA. L.ValdimarsdottirH. B.Jonsdottir TolgyesE. M.SigfussonJ.et al. (2021). Depressive symptoms, mental wellbeing, and substance use among adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iceland: a longitudinal, population-based study. Lancet Psychiatry8, 663–672. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00156-5/ATTACHMENT/4D5B4926-6BAA-4955-9646-65E61C9201B4/MMC2.PDF
92
UngarM. (2011). Community resilience for youth and families: facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity. Child Youth Serv. Rev.33, 1742–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.027
93
UNICEF (2020). Salud mental e infancia en el escenario de la covid-19 propuestas de Unicef España. Available at: https://www.unicef.es/publicacion/salud-mental-e-infancia-en-el-escenario-de-la-covid-19-propuestas-de-unicef-espana
94
VandendriesscheA.GhekiereA.Van CauwenbergJ.De ClercqB.DhondtK.DesmetA.et al. (2019). Does sleep mediate the association between school pressure, physical activity, screen time, and psychological symptoms in early adolescents? A 12-country study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health16, 1072. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH16061072
95
Villalonga-OlivesE.KawachiI. (2017). The dark side of social capital: a systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital. Soc. Sci. Med.194, 105–127. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2017.10.020
96
Villalonga-OlivesE.WindT. R.KawachiI. (2018). Social capital interventions in public health: a systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med.212, 203–218. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.022
97
VinerR. M.OzerE. M.DennyS.MarmotM.ResnickM.FatusiA.et al. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet (London, England)379, 1641–1652. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4
98
VingilisE. R.WadeT. J.SeeleyJ. S. (2002). Predictors of adolescent self-rated health: analysis of the national population health survey. Canadian J. Public Health = Revue Canadienne deSante Publique93, 193–197. doi: 10.1007/BF03404999
99
WadeT. J.VingilisE. (1999). The development of self-rated health during adolescence: an exploration of inter-and intra-cohort effects. Can. J. Public Health90, 90–94. doi: 10.1007/bf03404108
100
WallerG. (2015). Self-rated health in general practice: a plea for subjectivity. Br. J. Gen. Pract.65, 110–111. doi: 10.3399/BJGP15X683833
101
WalshS. D.Harel-FischY.Fogel-GrinvaldH. (2010). Parents, teachers and peer relations as predictors of risk behaviors and mental well-being among immigrant and Israeli born adolescents. Soc. Sci. Med.70, 976–984. doi: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2009.12.010
102
WareJ.SherbourneC. (1992). cThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care30, 473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
103
WestP. (1997). Health inequalities in the early years: is there equalisation in youth?Soc. Sci. Med.44, 833–858. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00188-8
104
WhiteheadR.BergC.CosmaA.GobinaI.KeaneE.NevilleF.et al. (2017). Trends in adolescent overweight perception and its association with psychosomatic health 2002–2014: evidence From 33 countries. J. Adolesc. Health60, 204–211. doi: 10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2016.09.029
105
World Health Organization (2022). Adolescent mental health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
106
YiC.-C. C.WuC.-I. I.ChangY.-H. H.ChangM.-Y. Y. (2009). The Psychological well-being of Taiwanese youth: school versus family context from early to late adolescence. Int. Sociol.24, 397–429. doi: 10.1177/0268580909102914
107
ZdanowiczN.JanneP.ReynaertC. (2004). Family, health, and adolescence. Psychosomatics45, 500–507. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.45.6.500
108
ZdanowiczN.LepieceB.TordeursD.JacquesD.JanneP.ReynaertC. (2011). Families and health interactions. Psychiatr. Danub.23, 270–274. PMID:
Summary
Keywords
social capital, mental health, adolescents, psychological distress, ecological approach
Citation
Carrillo-Alvarez E, Andrés A, Riera-Romaní J, Novak D, Rodriguez-Monforte M, Costa-Tutusaus L and Guerra-Balic M (2022) The association between social capital indicators and psychological distress in Catalan adolescents. Front. Psychol. 13:964689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964689
Received
08 June 2022
Accepted
21 July 2022
Published
17 August 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Changiz Mohiyeddini, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, United States
Reviewed by
Patrice Nabbe, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, France; X. S. Zhao, Southern Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Carrillo-Alvarez, Andrés, Riera-Romaní, Novak, Rodriguez-Monforte, Costa-Tutusaus and Guerra-Balic.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elena Carrillo-Alvarez, elenaca@blanquerna.url.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship
This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.