Negative psychological and physiological effects of social networking site use: The example of Facebook

Abstract

Social networking sites (SNS), with Facebook as a prominent example, have become an integral part of our daily lives and more than four billion people worldwide use SNS. However, the (over-)use of SNS also poses both psychological and physiological risks. In the present article, we review the scientific literature on the risk of Facebook (over-)use. Addressing this topic is critical because evidence indicates the development of problematic Facebook use (“Facebook addiction”) due to excessive and uncontrolled use behavior with various psychological and physiological effects. We conducted a review to examine the scope, range, and nature of prior empirical research on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. Our literature search process revealed a total of 232 papers showing that Facebook use is associated with eight major psychological effects (perceived anxiety, perceived depression, perceived loneliness, perceived eating disorders, perceived self-esteem, perceived life satisfaction, perceived insomnia, and perceived stress) and three physiological effects (physiological stress, human brain alteration, and affective experience state). The review also describes how Facebook use is associated with these effects and provides additional details on the reviewed literature, including research design, sample, age, and measures. Please note that the term “Facebook use” represents an umbrella term in the present work, and in the respective sections it will be made clear what kind of Facebook use is associated with a myriad of investigated psychological variables. Overall, findings indicate that certain kinds of Facebook use may come along with significant risks, both psychologically and physiologically. Based on our review, we also identify potential avenues for future research.

1. Introduction

Social networking sites (SNS) have become an integral part of our daily lives and play an important role in many areas. The main benefits of SNSs include creating connections between people (Hess et al., 2016), supporting collaboration and interpersonal communication (Kane et al., 2014), building social capital (Kwon et al., 2013) and generating marketing opportunities (Schreiner et al., 2021). Thus, SNSs provide a platform for social connection and sense of belonging (Zhao et al., 2012; Sariyska et al., 2019), which is considered a fundamental biological human need (Maslow, 1943; Kunc, 1992; Kenrick et al., 2010; Montag et al., 2020b; Rozgonjuk et al., 2021a). Also, SNSs promote continuous engagement due to their numerous features and functions. Examples include creating and maintaining personal profiles, sharing posts with family and friends, responding to notifications, or playing games (Frost and Rickwood, 2017; Chuang, 2020).

A prominent example of an SNS is Facebook. In fact, it is the most used SNS in the world, with around 2.96 billion active users each month (Statista, 2022d). American users, for example, spend an average of 33 min per day on Facebook (Statista, 2022a). An excessive and uncontrolled use of Facebook, however, also poses risks, both psychologically and physiologically. For example, frequent interaction with Facebook is associated with greater psychological distress (Chen and Lee, 2013). Mabe et al. (2014) found an association between regular social network use and perceived eating disorders. Other negative consequences that may result from excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use include the perception of depressive symptoms and anxiety (e.g., Wright et al., 2018), lower self-esteem (e.g., Hanna et al., 2017), as well as psychological (e.g., Brailovskaia et al., 2019a) and physiological stress (e.g., Campisi et al., 2017). Those who spend several hours a day on Facebook run the risk of losing control over their usage behavior (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2017) and developing a Facebook addiction (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013). Please note that the addiction term is not officially recognized when discussing social media overuse (for debates, please see Carbonell and Panova, 2017) and it is of importance to not overpathologize everyday life behavior (Billieux et al., 2015).

Considering the potential risks of an excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use, the aim of this paper is to develop a concise and fundamental understanding of the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use by synthesizing the accumulated knowledge of prior research. This review is therefore designed to provide an in-depth comprehension of the scope, range, and nature of the existing literature on the negative effects of Facebook use, including psychological and physiological effects (Hart, 1988). The term ‘Facebook use’ is an umbrella concept in our work. In the literature, different forms of Facebook use have been discussed ranging from overall use in terms of duration or frequency to active/passive use of Facebook (for recent updates, please see Verduyn et al., 2022) to addictive like use (Sindermann et al., 2020). Logically, different forms of Facebook use might be associated with different psychological effects. Therefore, each section will state in detail how Facebook use was operationalized in the different studies. When we speak in the following of “Facebook use,” it should be kept in mind that the term “Facebook use” here describes all kinds of Facebook use investigated in the literature. Accordingly, we address the following research question: What negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use are identified by the current state of scientific research?

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the methodology of our review. Then, Section 3 follows with a presentation of the review results. We discuss our results in Section 4 by focusing on contributions and potentials for future research activities. Finally, in Section 5, we provide a concluding statement.

2. Review methodology

To examine the scope, range, and nature of prior research on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use, we conducted a scoping review to determine the extent of existing literature and the topics addressed therein (for an overview of the different literature review types, please see Paré et al., 2015; Schryen et al., 2017, 2020). The literature search process was based on existing methodological recommendations for conducting literature searches (Webster and Watson, 2002; Kitchenham and Charters, 2007; vom Brocke et al., 2009) and considered peer-reviewed journal and conference papers in English with no publication year restriction. As outlined in detail below, the present review includes literature published prior to and in April 2022. Based on primary selected papers after a two-wave literature search, we conducted an initial review, followed by backward search, a second review of the associated results, and a subsequent forward search. Figure 1 graphically summarizes the literature search process.

Figure 1

2.1. Search strategy

We conducted a two-wave literature search of five literature databases. We searched ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science using a combination of the term “Facebook” in conjunction with terms addressing the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. This search process yielded a total of 12,061 hits.

The following search term syntax was used to identify empirical studies that addressed the negative effects of Facebook use on a psychological and/or physiological level: (“Facebook”) AND (“psychological” OR “physiological” OR “depress*” OR “anxiety” OR “stress” OR “life satisfaction” OR “self-esteem” OR “loneliness” OR “consequence” OR “outcome” OR “disorder” OR “sleep*”). Note that the asterisk was used to generalize the term for searching when it can have multiple meanings (i.e., depress* includes “depression,” “depressing,” or “depressive” and other terms beginning with “depress”). In the databases IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science the search terms could be used by default mode (that covers title, abstract, and keywords) to search for relevant papers. For the ACM database search, the abstract was used to narrow the search for relevant papers.

The first wave of our literature search was conducted in March 2022 and yielded 10,019 hits. The second wave was conducted in April 2022 with the goal of obtaining additional empirical studies on the negative physiological effects of Facebook use. To this end, we repeated our literature search in the mentioned literature databases and included the following physiological keywords [adopted from Riedl et al., 2020], resulting in the following search term syntax: (“Facebook”) AND (“Nervous system” OR “Neuro-Information Systems” OR “NeuroIS” OR “Neuroscience” OR “Brain” OR “Diffusion Tensor” OR “EEG” OR “fMRI” OR “Infared” OR “MEG” OR “Morpho*” OR “NIRS” OR “Positron emission” OR “Transcranial” OR “Dermal” OR “ECG” OR “ECG” OR “Electrocardiogram” OR “Electromyography” OR “Eye” OR “Facial” OR “Galvan*” OR “Heart” OR “HRV” OR “Muscular” OR “Oculo*” OR “Skin” OR “Blood” OR “Hormone” OR “Saliva” OR “Urine”). The second wave of our literature search yielded 2,042 hits. Note that NeuroIS is a scientific field which relies on neuroscience and neurophysiological knowledge and tools to better understand the development, use, and impact of information and communication technologies, including SNSs (Riedl et al., 2020).

In summary, search terms were chosen to reflect the topic of this paper in its entirety (e.g., “psychological” and “physiological”). Additionally, specific search terms were used to refer specifically to the psychological and physiological effects (e.g., “depress*” and “stress”). We also used keywords such as “ECG” that are representative of the data collection methods for measuring physiological effects to identify additional studies. In both waves of our literature search, we focused exclusively on peer-reviewed English-language journal and conference papers with no publication date restriction.

2.2. Filtering strategy

The filtering strategy included empirical studies that examined the negative effects of Facebook use on a psychological or physiological level as eligibility criteria. The psychological effects include those that are generally consistent with the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5 Update) published by the American Psychiatric Association (2018). In addition, loneliness, life satisfaction, and self-esteem were also considered, although they are not included in the DSM-5 Update. They are considered as important psychological indicators and are critical for mental and physical well-being (Mann et al., 2004; Mushtaq et al., 2014) and subjective well-being along with life satisfaction (Pavot and Diener, 1993).

“Facebook use” was defined as use of all features of Facebook. Common conceptualizations of Facebook use include time spent on Facebook, number of Facebook friends, number of logins to Facebook, attitudes toward Facebook use, or indicators of an addiction construct consisting of a combination of behavioral and attitudinal variables (Frost and Rickwood, 2017): Therefore, we additionally considered the problematic facets of Facebook use, such as Facebook addiction (Turel et al., 2014) and Facebook intrusion (Cudo et al., 2019). Please note that in the literature Facebook overuse is often assessed via an addiction framework, but as mentioned above, neither Facebook addiction nor problematic Facebook use (the more neutral term) are officially recognized conditions in either DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2018) or the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019). We do not want to go deeper into this discussion here but highlight that we aim to review both papers dealing with use and overuse of Facebook, independently of how the actual nature of overuse will be seen or characterized in a few years.

To be included in this review, we focused exclusively on peer-reviewed studies that empirically investigated negative effects of Facebook use on a psychological or physiological level. After conducting the two-wave literature search, we removed unrelated papers based on title and abstract, which left us with 402 papers. We then removed duplicates, which left us with 236 unique papers, which were then analyzed in-depth based on the full text. During this process, we also developed and applied the exclusion criteria listed in Table 1 to exclude papers that were not adequate in the light of the goal of this review. Following this filtering strategy, 165 unique papers remained for further analysis.

2.3. Backward and forward search

The 165 identified papers were then used for a backward search (i.e., searching the references), which yielded 101 additional papers, resulting in a total of 266 unique papers. After applying our exclusion criteria, 72 papers were removed, leaving a total of 194 papers. Next, we conducted a forward search (i.e., citation tracking) based on the 194 papers by using Google Scholar. This part of the search process resulted in 5,984 hits, of which 114 papers were selected for further investigation based on title and abstract, yielding a total of 308 papers. As part of this step, we excluded papers that were not peer-reviewed (e.g., Denti et al., 2012; Steggink, 2015). After applying our full list of exclusion criteria, 76 papers were removed, leaving a total of 232 papers which constitute the basis of all analyses in the present review.

Overall, this review includes empirical literature on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use published before and in April 2022. Specifically, 217 papers deal with the negative psychological effects of Facebook use, consisting of 213 journal papers (98%) and 4 conference papers (2%), and the remaining 15 papers (all journal articles) deal with the negative physiological effects of Facebook use. The Supplementary material contains an overview of the N = 232 papers.

3. Review results

In this section, we present the main findings of our review. Our literature search process revealed a total of 232 papers showing that Facebook use is associated with eight psychological effects (perceived anxiety, perceived depression, perceived loneliness, perceived eating disorders, perceived self-esteem, perceived life satisfaction, perceived insomnia, and perceived stress) and three physiological effects (physiological stress, human brain alteration, and affective experience state). Figure 2 graphically summarizes the main findings of our literature search process. The psychological effects of Facebook use are described in detail below, followed by the physiological effects. The Supplementary material provides additional details on the identified studies by construct (i.e., identified psychological and physiological effects), including research design, sample, age, measures, and strength of associations between Facebook use and its effects.

Figure 2

3.1. Psychological effects of Facebook Use

We found 217 empirical studies that examined psychological effects of Facebook use. The 217 studies included 183 cross-sectional studies (85%), 24 longitudinal studies (11%), 5 experimental studies (2%), and 5 studies that conducted a multimethod research design (2%). Our analysis revealed that Facebook use is associated with eight major psychological effects, which we discuss in the following. We summarize the identified papers on the psychological effects of Facebook use with their effect type, based on results which are reported as statistically significant (negative [−], positive [+], no effect [∼] in Table 2). To reveal the scope, range, and nature of prior empirical research on how Facebook use is associated with these psychological effects, we considered the research context of the identified studies rather than just the effect direction. For example, we classified the Błachnio et al.’s (2021) paper as a study reporting a negative effect because it found that Facebook intrusion was positively associated with perceived anxiety. Note that we also classified a few papers as “descriptive [/],” referring to studies that reported only descriptive statistics such as frequency distributions associated with Facebook addiction without correlative or more sophisticated statistics (Jha et al., 2016; Norman et al., 2017).

3.1.1. Perceived anxiety

Forty-seven studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived (social) anxiety. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 47 studies included 43 cross-sectional studies (42 surveys and 1 case–control survey), 2 longitudinal studies (2 panel studies), 1 experimental study (1 quasi-experiment), and 1 study that applied a multimethod research design (1 study was a longitudinal panel study and another one an experimental study with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design).

The results of the review revealed that Facebook addiction was slightly to strongly positively correlated with perceived (social) anxiety (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013; Zaffar et al., 2015; Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2017; Atroszko et al., 2018, 2022; da Veiga et al., 2019; Foroughi et al., 2019; Louragli et al., 2019; Sotero et al., 2019; Xie and Karan, 2019; Eşkisu et al., 2020; Brailovskaia et al., 2020a,b; Verseillié et al., 2021). Results also suggest that individuals with Facebook addiction are at high risk of developing anxiety (Hanprathet et al., 2015). Further examples of positive effects on perceived (social) anxiety include, for example, Facebook intrusion (Błachnio et al., 2021), lying and liking behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), number of Facebook friends (Flynn et al., 2018; Nazzal et al., 2021), perceived emotional connectedness to Facebook (Clayton et al., 2013), perceived emotional engagement with Facebook (Verseillié et al., 2021), risky and impulsive Facebook use (Flynn et al., 2018), time spent on Facebook (Labrague, 2014; Shaw et al., 2015; Flynn et al., 2018; Sternberg et al., 2018; Nazzal et al., 2021), and use of socially interactive features of Facebook (McCord et al., 2014). For individuals who make social comparisons on Facebook, which can lead to a perceived frequency of a negative feeling from social comparisons on Facebook (Lee, 2014), there was a medium positive effect for perceived anxiety. Positive correlations with perceived anxiety were also found to a small to moderate extent for users with passive Facebook use (Shaw et al., 2015; Hanna et al., 2017) or problematic Facebook use (Lee-Won et al., 2015; Chabrol et al., 2017; Dempsey et al., 2019; Nasser et al., 2019; Ho et al., 2021a). Examples of negative effects on perceived (social) anxiety are frequency of Facebook use (Dempsey et al., 2019) or perceived social connectedness from the use of Facebook (Grieve et al., 2013).

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived (social) anxiety, among others: academic motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), active Facebook use (Hanna et al., 2017), connection as motive for using Facebook (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), daily informational motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), Facebook account length (Hussain et al., 2019; Ögel-Balaban and Altan, 2020), friendship as motive for using Facebook (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), information as motive for using Facebook (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), inspection time of Facebook updates (Hussain et al., 2019), inspection time of social updates on Facebook (Hussain et al., 2019), number of activities during Facebook use (Sternberg et al., 2018), perceived frequency of posting on Facebook (Ögel-Balaban and Altan, 2020), social motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), use of Facebook for interactive communication (Shaw et al., 2015), use of socially interactive features of Facebook (McCord et al., 2014; Sillence et al., 2021), and weekly time commitment on Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013). A summary of all effects of the forty-seven studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived (social) anxiety can be found in Table 2.

3.1.2. Perceived depression

Eighty-nine studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived depression. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 89 studies included 76 cross-sectional studies (75 surveys and 1 case–control survey), 10 longitudinal studies (8 panel studies and 2 longitudinal randomized experiments), 2 experimental studies (1 quasi-experiment and 1 experimental study with an RCT design), and 1 study that applied a multimethod research design (1 study was a cross-sectional survey study and another one was a longitudinal study with a time-series design).

Low to high positive effects on perceived depression have been found among individuals who are addicted to Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013; Hong et al., 2014; Zaffar et al., 2015; Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2017; Khattak et al., 2017; da Veiga et al., 2019; Damota, 2019; Foroughi et al., 2019; Kulkarni and Deshpande, 2019; Sotero et al., 2019; Brailovskaia et al., 2019b,d; Bais and Reyes, 2020; Eşkisu et al., 2020; Iovu et al., 2020; Rachubińska et al., 2021; Verseillié et al., 2021; Ho, 2021a; Atroszko et al., 2022) or through perceived social comparisons on Facebook, such as the perceived upward social comparison on Facebook (Steers et al., 2014; Tosun and Kaşdarma, 2020; Dibb and Foster, 2021). Further positive effects on perceived depression include active private or public Facebook use (Frison and Eggermont, 2016a, 2020), Facebook intensity (Iovu et al., 2020; Ahamed et al., 2021; Nazzal et al., 2021), Facebook intrusion (Bendayan and Blanca Mena, 2019; Przepiórka and Błachnio, 2020; Cudo et al., 2020a,b), Facebook surveillance (Scherr et al., 2019), liking behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), passive Facebook use (Frison and Eggermont, 2016a, 2020; Dibb and Foster, 2021), perceived negative social support on Facebook (McCloskey et al., 2015), problematic Facebook use (Walburg et al., 2016; Chabrol et al., 2017; Dempsey et al., 2019; Nasser et al., 2019; Ho et al., 2021a), and time spent on Facebook (Kang et al., 2013; Labrague, 2014; Steers et al., 2014; Chow and Wan, 2017; Scherr and Brunet, 2017; Flynn et al., 2018; Sternberg et al., 2018; Frison et al., 2019; Frison and Eggermont, 2020; Nazzal et al., 2021; Yeshua-Katz and Zilberstein, 2021). Also, results suggest that general Facebook use predicts bipolar disorder (Rosen et al., 2013a,b).

Examples of negative effects on perceived depression include perceived social comparison when using Facebook actively (Nisar et al., 2019), perceived social connectedness from the use of Facebook (Grieve et al., 2013), perceived social support through Facebook (Frison and Eggermont, 2015, 2016a; Frison et al., 2019), perceived upward-identification in social comparison on Facebook (Kang et al., 2013), and relationship maintenance as motive for using Facebook (Scherr and Brunet, 2017). The number of Facebook friends, for example, was both negatively (Rae and Lonborg, 2015; Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2019) and positively (Nazzal et al., 2021) associated with perceived depression.

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived loneliness, among others: Facebook account length (Locatelli et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2013), Facebook network size (Zhang, 2017), Facebook session length (Hussain et al., 2019), level of interest in Facebook use (Kang et al., 2013), lying behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), number of activities during Facebook use (Sternberg et al., 2018), number of Facebook pages a user has marked as like (Park et al., 2013), number of groups on Facebook for which a user is an administrator (Park et al., 2013), number of groups on Facebook to which a user belongs (including groups of which a user is an administrator) (Park et al., 2013), number of interest items listed on the user’s Facebook profile (Park et al., 2013), number of pending incoming friend requests on Facebook (Park et al., 2013), perceived downward social comparison on Facebook (Dibb and Foster, 2021), perceived frequency of writing in discussion groups on Facebook (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2019), perceived frequency of writing negative status updates on Facebook (Locatelli et al., 2012), perceived frequency of writing online messages on Facebook (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2019), perceived frequency of writing positive status updates on Facebook (Locatelli et al., 2012), perceived frequency of writing status updates on Facebook (Locatelli et al., 2012; Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2019), time spent on Facebook apps (including games) (Hong et al., 2014), time spent on Facebook chat rooms (Hong et al., 2014), time spent on Facebook newsfeeds (Hong et al., 2014), and viewing other Facebook profiles as motive for using Facebook (Maglunog and Dy, 2019). A summary of all effects of the eighty-nine studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived depression can be found in Table 2.

3.1.3. Perceived loneliness

Forty-six studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived loneliness. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 46 studies included 41 cross-sectional studies (40 surveys) and 5 longitudinal studies (4 panel studies and 1 longitudinal randomized experiment).

Very strong positive effects on perceived loneliness were found for perceived upward social comparison on Facebook (Lim and Yang, 2019; Dibb and Foster, 2021). Also, a positive medium-strong correlation was found between compensatory Facebook use (Goljović, 2017) or connection as motive for using Facebook (Clayton et al., 2013; Jin, 2013) and perceived loneliness. A medium-weak correlation was found between time spent on Facebook (Skues et al., 2012; Lemieux et al., 2013; Teppers et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2019; Frison and Eggermont, 2020; Rahman and Zakaria, 2021) and perceived loneliness. Furthermore, Facebook addiction correlates positively with perceived loneliness to a low to moderate level (Omar and Subramanian, 2013; Saleem et al., 2016; Błachnio et al., 2016a; Chavez and Chavez Jr., 2017; Goljović, 2017; Shettar et al., 2017; Atroszko et al., 2018; Biolcati et al., 2018; Satici, 2019; Aung and Tin, 2020; Rajesh and Rangaiah, 2020; Ho et al., 2021aHo, 2021a; Smith and Short, 2022). However, Rachubińska et al. (2021) also found a negative correlation between Facebook addiction and perceived loneliness.

A negative effect was found between the number of Facebook friends and perceived loneliness (Skues et al., 2012; Jin, 2013; Phu and Gow, 2019). That is, the more Facebook friends one has, the lower the feeling of perceived loneliness. Results also indicate that active use of Facebook (Jin, 2013), including connection (Clayton et al., 2013; Jin, 2013), maintaining relationships (Teppers et al., 2014), or personal contact (Teppers et al., 2014) as motive for using Facebook can reduce perceived loneliness. Also, results suggest that active posting on Facebook can reduce perceived loneliness (große Deters and Mehl, 2013).

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived depression, among others: communication as motive for using Facebook (Aydın et al., 2013), Facebook access time via PC (Ye et al., 2021), Facebook access time via smartphone (Ye et al., 2021), following photos, videos, status, comments as motive for using Facebook (Aydın et al., 2013), frequency of Facebook use (Türkmen et al., 2022), new acquaintance as motive for using Facebook (Aydın et al., 2013), number of Facebook logins (Skues et al., 2012), passive engagement on Facebook (Ryan and Xenos, 2011), perceived boredom of use of Facebook (Phu and Gow, 2019), perceived downward social comparison on Facebook (Dibb and Foster, 2021), perceived use experience of Facebook (Jin, 2013), personal contact as motive for using Facebook (Teppers et al., 2014), playing games on Facebook as motive for using Facebook (Aydın et al., 2013), sharing photos, videos, and notifications on Facebook as motive for using Facebook (Aydın et al., 2013), time spent on Facebook for private purposes (Stieger, 2019), use of Facebook chat (Ahmed, 2018), and use of Facebook for news and information (Ryan and Xenos, 2011). A summary of all effects of the forty-six that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived loneliness can be found in Table 2.

3.1.4. Perceived eating disorder

Seven studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived eating disorder. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 7 studies included 4 longitudinal studies (4 panel studies), 2 cross-sectional studies (2 surveys), and 1 study that applied a multimethod research design (1 study was a cross-sectional survey study and another one was a matched-pair experimental study).

Maladaptive Facebook use was found to be a significant predictor of increases in perceived bulimic symptoms, perceived body dissatisfaction, perceived shape concerns, and perceived episodes of overeating (Smith et al., 2013). Results further indicate that maladaptive Facebook use had moderately strong positive effects on perceived concern about physical shape and weight (Mannino et al., 2021). When Facebook was used to make online comparisons of physical appearance, it had large effects on perceived eating disorder, which means the more comparisons, the more likely the perceived eating disorder (Walker et al., 2015). Perceptions of social comparison on Facebook also correlated significantly positively with perceived food restraint and perceived bulimic symptoms, although perceptions of social comparison on Facebook suggested that perceived bulimic symptoms decreased over time (Puccio et al., 2016). Passive use of Facebook for social comparison (Mannino et al., 2021), perceived negative feedback seeking on Facebook (Hummel and Smith, 2015), personal status updates on Facebook (Hummel and Smith, 2015), and time spent on Facebook (Mannino et al., 2021) showed little to no effect on perceived physical shape concern, perceived concern about weight, or perceived concern about eating. Individuals who spent 20 min on Wikipedia showed greater decreases in perceived concerns about weight and shape than those individuals who spent 20 min on Facebook (Mabe et al., 2014).

Facebook use was not significantly related to the “Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26)” (González-Nuevo et al., 2021), a screening instrument for eating disorders, dieting, and bulimia (Garner et al., 1982). Similarly, perceived negative feedback seeking on Facebook (Hummel and Smith, 2015) was not associated with perceived dietary restraint (Hummel and Smith, 2015). Also, time spent on Facebook did not significantly correlate with disordered eating behaviors (Mabe et al., 2014). A summary of all effects of the seven that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived eating disorder can be found in Table 2.

3.1.5. Perceived self-esteem

Sixty-seven studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived self-esteem. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 67 studies included 58 cross-sectional studies (57 surveys and 1 case–control survey), 4 experimental studies (3 experimental studies with an RCT design and 1 quasi-experiment), 3 longitudinal studies (2 panel studies and 1 longitudinal study with a time-series design), and 2 studies that conducted a multimethod research design (specifically a cross-sectional survey study with an experimental study with an RCT design).

Perceptions of social comparison on Facebook, especially perceived upward social comparison on Facebook (Vogel et al., 2014; Lee, 2020) and perceived frequency of a negative feeling from social comparisons on Facebook (Lee, 2014) had a strong negative effect on perceived self-esteem (Lee, 2014, 2020). Facebook addiction also had a particularly negative effect on perceived self-esteem (Hong et al., 2014; Malik and Khan, 2015; Błachnio et al., 2016b; Baturay and Toker, 2017; Goljović, 2017; Nizami et al., 2017; Atroszko et al., 2018; Kanat-Maymon et al., 2018; Bais and Reyes, 2020; Eşkisu et al., 2020; Seran et al., 2020; Stănculescu and Griffiths, 2021; Awobamise et al., 2022; Smith and Short, 2022; Uram and Skalski, 2022). However, different results could be found in this regard. Namely, Sehar et al. (2022) found a strong positive relationship between Facebook addiction and perceived self-esteem. Facebook intensity also had a positive (Whitman and Gottdiener, 2016) and negative (Błachnio et al., 2016c; Ahamed et al., 2021) effect on perceived self-esteem. Further examples of negative effects on perceived self-esteem include compensatory Facebook use (Goljović, 2017), Facebook fatigue (Cramer et al., 2016), Facebook intrusion (Błachnio et al., 2019; Błachnio and Przepiórka, 2019; Przepiórka et al., 2021), perceived feeling of connectedness to Facebook (Tazghini and Siedlecki, 2013), perceived frequency of untagging oneself from in photos on Facebook (Tazghini and Siedlecki, 2013), perceived level of Facebook integration into daily activities (Faraon and Kaipainen, 2014), perceived negative activities on Facebook (Tazghini and Siedlecki, 2013), problematic Facebook use (Tobin and Graham, 2020; Primi et al., 2021), risky and impulsive Facebook use (Flynn et al., 2018), time spent on Facebook (Faraon and Kaipainen, 2014; Hanna et al., 2017; Bergagna and Tartaglia, 2018), and use of Facebook for simulation (Bergagna and Tartaglia, 2018). Research also suggests that browsing own Facebook newsfeed (Alfasi, 2019), passive Facebook use (Hanna et al., 2017), and use of Facebook for social comparison (Ozimek and Bierhoff, 2020) are associated with lower perceived self-esteem.

Positive effects on perceived self-esteem included, for example, initiating of online relationships as motive for using Facebook (Metzler and Scheithauer, 2017), liking behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), number of Facebook friends (Metzler and Scheithauer, 2017), temporary break from Facebook use (O’Sullivan and Hussain, 2017), or use of socially interactive features of Facebook (Błachnio et al., 2016d), Facebook users had significantly higher mean score for perceived self-esteem compared to non-Facebook users (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2016). Individuals who viewed only their own profile reported higher self-esteem than those who viewed other profiles in addition to their own (Gonzales and Hancock, 2011).

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived self-esteem, among others: active Facebook use (Hanna et al., 2017), active hours on Facebook (Baturay and Toker, 2017), education as intended purpose for using Facebook (Eşkisu et al., 2017), frequency of Facebook use (Cudo et al., 2020a,b; Türkmen et al., 2022), information search on Facebook (Castillo de Mesa et al., 2020), inspection time of social updates on Facebook (Hussain et al., 2019), lying behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), mobile Facebook use (Schmuck et al., 2019), number of Facebook logins (Skues et al., 2012), perceived level of activity on Facebook (Michikyan et al., 2015), perceived level of awareness when using Facebook (Tazghini and Siedlecki, 2013), public communication with Facebook friends (Manago et al., 2012), reading on Facebook (Cramer et al., 2016), social interaction as intended purpose for using Facebook (Eşkisu et al., 2017), tolerance of diversity on Facebook (Castillo de Mesa et al., 2020), use and presence of Facebook in life (Castillo de Mesa et al., 2020), and use of Facebook for search for relations (Bergagna and Tartaglia, 2018). A summary of all effects of the sixty-six studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived self-esteem can be found in Table 2.

3.1.6. Perceived life satisfaction

Forty-four studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived life satisfaction. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 44 studies included 37 cross-sectional studies (37 surveys) and 7 longitudinal studies (4 panel studies, 2 longitudinal randomized experiments, and 1 longitudinal study with a time-series design).

Examples of negative effects on perceived life satisfaction at a low to moderate level include various Facebook activities such as looking at other’s photos/videos on Facebook (Vigil and Wu, 2015), tagging photos on Facebook (Vigil and Wu, 2015), or uploading photos on Facebook (Vigil and Wu, 2015). Compensatory Facebook Use (Goljović, 2017), Facebook addiction (Akın and Akın, 2015; Biolcati et al., 2018; Satici, 2019), Facebook intrusion (Błachnio et al., 2019), passive Facebook use (Frison and Eggermont, 2016b), passive following on Facebook (Wenninger et al., 2014), or time spent on Facebook (Vigil and Wu, 2015; Frison and Eggermont, 2016b; Stieger, 2019) were also negatively associated with perceived life satisfaction.

Positive effects on perceived life satisfaction were mainly due to active Facebook use (Choi, 2022), Facebook check-in intensity (Wang, 2013), and general Facebook use (Basilisco and Cha, 2015; Srivastava, 2015; Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2016). Facebook network size (Manago et al., 2012), number of Facebook friends (Nabi et al., 2013; Srivastava, 2015; Vigil and Wu, 2015; Lönnqvist and große Deters, 2016), number of Facebook hours per week (Cudo et al., 2020a,b), perceived social attention on Facebook (Adnan and Mavi, 2015), or perceived social connectedness from the use of Facebook (Grieve et al., 2013) also influenced perceived life satisfaction in positive ways. A 20-min reduction in daily Facebook time produced a steady increase in perceived life satisfaction scores over a three-month period (Brailovskaia et al., 2020a, 2020b). Furthermore, one study showed that increasing Facebook use over time is associated with lower perceived life satisfaction (Kross et al., 2013). This finding is consistent with another study that found perceived life satisfaction increased after a one-week absence from Facebook (Tromholt, 2016). In contrast to these results, Facebook users had significantly higher mean scores for perceived life satisfaction compared to non-Facebook users (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2016).

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived life satisfaction, among others: commenting on Facebook (Wenninger et al., 2014), communication as motive for using Facebook (Adnan and Mavi, 2015), connection as motive for using Facebook (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), Facebook account length (Locatelli et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2013), friendship as motive for using Facebook (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), information as motive for using Facebook (Adnan and Mavi, 2015; Rae and Lonborg, 2015), information search on Facebook (Castillo de Mesa et al., 2020), level of interest in Facebook use (Kang et al., 2013), liking on Facebook (Wenninger et al., 2014), mobile Facebook use (Schmuck et al., 2019), perceived frequency of writing status updates on Facebook (Locatelli et al., 2012), private communication with Facebook friends (Manago et al., 2012), and use and presence of Facebook in life (Castillo de Mesa et al., 2020). A summary of all effects of the forty-four studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived life satisfaction can be found in Table 2.

3.1.7. Perceived insomnia

Sixteen studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived insomnia. Results varied slightly, ranging from no effect to a small effect. The 16 studies included 15 cross-sectional studies (15 surveys) and 1 longitudinal study (1 panel study).

Facebook addiction was significantly positively associated with perceived poorer sleep quality (Wang et al., 2021; Ho, 2021a; Ho et al., 2021a), perceived insomnia (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013; Brailovskaia et al., 2019a), and perceived sleep disturbance (Ho, 2021b). Furthermore, research showed that problematic Facebook use was significantly positively correlated with perceived poorer sleep quality (Ho et al., 2021a). Indeed, daily Facebook use was significantly positively correlated with perceived insomnia over time (Brailovskaia et al., 2019a). Such findings are supported by other research, which found that Facebook intrusion was positively associated with perceived sleep problems (Przepiórka and Błachnio, 2020) and perceived insomnia (Błachnio et al., 2021). Additionally, one study showed that Facebook addiction was also significantly negatively associated with perceived sleep quality (Atroszko et al., 2018), and another study concluded that individuals with a Facebook addiction were at high risk of developing insomnia (Hanprathet et al., 2015).

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived insomnia, among others: academic motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), daily Facebook use (Brailovskaia et al., 2019a), daily informational motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), social motive for using Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013), and weekly time commitment on Facebook (Koc and Gulyagci, 2013). A summary of all effects of the sixteen studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived insomnia can be found in Table 2.

3.1.8. Perceived stress

Twenty-seven studies were found that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived stress. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 27 studies included 24 cross-sectional studies (24 surveys) and 3 longitudinal studies (3 panel studies).

Results show that perceived stress was primarily very strongly associated with Facebook addiction. For example, Brailovskaia et al. (2019a) found a very strong correlation between Facebook addiction and daily stress in both the U.S. and German samples. A strong positive correlation was also found in the study by Brailovskaia et al. (2019c). Moreover, Facebook addiction correlated with stress at low (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2017; Atroszko et al., 2018, 2022; Eşkisu et al., 2020; Verseillié et al., 2021; Balcerowska et al., 2022) and medium (Brailovskaia et al., 2018b; Ho, 2021b) levels. Further positive effects on perceived stress at low and/or moderate levels include Facebook intensity (O’Sullivan and Hussain, 2017; Pal et al., 2018; Brailovskaia et al., 2019c; Nazzal et al., 2021), perceived emotional engagement with Facebook (Verseillié et al., 2021), perceived online social support received from other Facebook users (Brailovskaia et al., 2019a), perceived social comparison on Facebook (Flynn et al., 2018), problematic Facebook use (Nasser et al., 2019; Ho et al., 2021a), and risky and impulsive Facebook use (Flynn et al., 2018). However, one study found a significant negative correlation between the number of Facebook friends and perceived stress (Nabi et al., 2013), albeit at a low level.

No statistically significant effect was found between the following types of Facebook use and perceived stress, among others: Facebook account length (Bevan et al., 2014; Hussain et al., 2019), Facebook session length (Hussain et al., 2019), inspection time of Facebook updates (Hussain et al., 2019), inspection time of social updates on Facebook (Hussain et al., 2019), lying behavior on Facebook (Wright et al., 2018), and temporary break from Facebook use (O’Sullivan and Hussain, 2017). A summary of all effects of the twenty-seven studies that examined the psychological effects of Facebook use on perceived stress can be found in Table 2.

3.2. Physiological effects of Facebook Use

We found 15 empirical studies that examined physiological effects of Facebook use. The 15 studies included 7 experimental studies (47%), 6 longitudinal studies (40%), and 2 cross-sectional studies (13%). Our analysis revealed that Facebook use is associated with three major physiological effects, which we discuss in the following. We summarize the identified papers on the physiological effects of Facebook use with their effect type, based on results which are reported as statistically significant (negative [−], positive [+], no effect [∼] in Table 3). To reveal the scope, range, and nature of prior empirical research on how Facebook use is associated with these physiological effects, we considered the research context of the identified studies rather than just the effect direction. For example, we classified the studies by Campisi et al. (2012, 2017) as reporting negative effects because they found that increasing Facebook network size was positively associated with an increasing upper respiratory infections rate. Note that we also classified one paper as “descriptive [/]” (He et al., 2017).

3.2.1. Physiological stress

Nine studies examined the effects of Facebook use on physiological stress. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 9 studies included 5 longitudinal studies (4 longitudinal studies with a time-series design and 1 longitudinal randomized experiment) and 4 experimental studies (3 experimental studies with an RCT design and 1 quasi-experiment).

The aim of the study by Afifi et al. (2018) was to determine the effects of technology and media use on stress and inflammation. At the beginning of the study, each participant completed a questionnaire and kept a diary of technology and media use, nighttime technology use, and hours of sleep from Monday to Friday. Saliva samples were used to determine cortisol and inflammation levels. Saliva samples were collected immediately after waking in the morning, 30 min after waking, at noon, and immediately before bedtime. Two main effects of Facebook use on stress and inflammation were found in the adolescents. With increasing Facebook use, cortisol awakening response and inflammation levels increased.

Campisi et al. (2012) investigated the association between Facebook use and upper respiratory infections (URI). Survey analysis revealed that most participants had difficulty completing their study assignments due to the high levels of stress they had experienced in the previous 3 months. The average number of infections during the 10-week period was 2.5 infections per person. The results also suggest that the Facebook network size (i.e., number of Facebook friends) had an impact on the frequency of URIs, and also on the average number of URIs per person. In addition, there was a significant relationship between the occurrence of URIs and the feeling of anger or sadness when someone ended their Facebook friendship. Facebook-induced stress had no significant effect on the frequency of URIs or on the average number of URIs per individual. Campisi et al. (2012) argued that chronic stress can affect the immune system. Users who are stressed by Facebook use may therefore have a weakened immune system.

In another study, Campisi et al. (2017) examined whether the interaction between Facebook use and stress can be explained by Facebook users’ behavior. To record the occurrence of URIs, participants had to keep a weekly diary for 10 weeks. Analysis of the data revealed a strong influence of social network size on the average number of URIs per person. Participants who experienced anxiety or stress due to Facebook use had a significantly higher number of URIs compared to individuals who did not experience Facebook-induced anxiety or stress. Also, there was a significant positive correlation between the number of Facebook logins per day and the number of URIs.

The study by Cipresso et al. (2019) sought to determine whether the psychological stress of navigating one’s own Facebook profile was higher, lower, or the same as navigating the profiles of other users. Physiological measurements were used to assess participants’ psychophysiological state. Participants were instructed to move freely on Facebook for 5 min. This allowed them, for example, to click on anything and go to any page within their own Facebook account. Eye-tracking data was collected to determine whether participants were viewing content that was related to themselves or to content that was related to others. Results showed that psychological stress increased significantly when viewing content that is related to oneself compared to viewing content that is related to others. Cipresso et al. (2019) reached this conclusion based on decreased heart rate variability, increased sympathetic component, and increased sympathovagal balance.

Moreno et al. (2014) investigated whether the biological response to stress is influenced by Facebook use and undertook a characterization of participants’ Facebook use during a stressful event. The biological response was measured using salivary cortisol samples and a radial pulse measurement. The cortisol level increased in the Facebook group, while it decreased in the control group. In the Facebook group, the pulse increased more compared to the control group and stabilized toward the end of the experimental session. However, there were no significant differences in either the Facebook group or the control group with respect to the change in cortisol level or pulse. The male participants in the Facebook group had above-average pulse values and showed increased biological signs of stress during a stressful event, which were predominantly attributed to the distracting use of Facebook.

The aim of the study by Morin-Major et al. (2016) was to examine the relationships between adolescents’ basal levels of diurnal cortisol and various Facebook behaviors, specifically frequency of use, self-expression, peer interaction, and network size. Cortisol levels were measured on two nonconsecutive weekdays over a three-week period. Significant correlations existed between Facebook network size and cortisol awakening response, systemic cortisol output, and perceived stress. In addition, frequency of Facebook use correlated with perceived stress, and perceived stress correlated with cortisol awakening response and systemic cortisol output. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to examine which diurnal cortisol timeframe was most strongly associated with Facebook behavior. Morin-Major et al. (2016) found that Facebook network size was significantly positively associated with cortisol awakening response, which included changes from awakening to 30 min after. However, no associations were found between Facebook behavior and the decline in cortisol levels from supper time to bedtime.

Rus and Tiemensma (2017) investigated the influence of Facebook in terms of reactivity to an acute social stressor. They used both physiological (saliva samples, blood pressure, and heart rate) and psychosocial measures (Facebook use, mood, well-being, and subjective stress) to measure changes in physiological and subjective stress, as well as use behavior. As a result of the acute stressor (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST; Kirschbaum et al., 1993), participants experienced changes in both physiological and subjective stress. However, individuals who belonged to the Facebook user group surprisingly responded to the stressor with lower levels of physiological stress (systolic blood pressure) as well as lower levels of psychosocial stress. The same outcome was observed in the recovery phase. Based on the results, Rus and Tiemensma (2017) concluded that Facebook use prior to experiencing an acute stressor may have a buffering effect, particularly with respect to psychosocial stress.

In another study, Rus and Tiemensma (2018) examined how Facebook use affects recovery from stress (induced by the TSST; Kirschbaum et al., 1993). At the beginning of the study, participants completed a questionnaire about the intensity of Facebook use (measured with the Facebook Intensity Scale; Ellison et al., 2007). To examine the effect of Facebook use on a stress response, participants were then randomly assigned to either use their own Facebook account (experimental condition) or to use optional digital reading material for 20 min (control condition) before subsequently undergoing a TSST. To measure physiological markers of stress in response to the TSST, saliva samples were collected at baseline and at various time points during the study, blood pressure and heart rate were measured continuously, and psychosocial stress was assessed in the form of self-reports at various time points during the study. Upon completion of the TSST, all participants had 30 min of recovery as well as access to the digital reading material provided in the control condition. During the recovery phase, participants in both groups experienced similar changes in psychosocial stress. However, physiological recovery was inhibited in the Facebook group. This group had higher cortisol levels compared to the control group. Effects of Facebook use on blood pressure, heart rate, and psychosocial stress were not detected despite the elevated cortisol levels. Although individuals in the experimental group showed a sustained physiological stress response, participants in this group reported recovering as well as the subjects in the control group. Altogether, Rus and Tiemensma (2018) showed that Facebook use can delay or impair recovery after a stressor.

Vanman et al. (2018) determined whether a five-day Facebook break would reduce both stress and subjective well-being. Participants filled out surveys at the beginning of the study to assess stress and well-being. This was followed by taking the first saliva sample. Next, a program randomly assigned study participants to one of two conditions: One group was instructed to use Facebook as usual until the second session, while the other group was not allowed to use Facebook. At the beginning of the study, there was no difference between the cortisol levels of the two groups. However, later there was a decrease in cortisol levels in the group without Facebook. In contrast, cortisol levels in the Facebook group remained relatively unchanged. Thus, Vanman et al. (2018) showed that even a five-day Facebook break can lead to lower cortisol levels. However, the individuals who abstained from Facebook for 5 days reported lower levels of life satisfaction compared to the Facebook group.

3.2.2. Human brain alteration

Three studies were found that examined the effects of Facebook use on human brain alteration. Results varied widely, ranging from no effect to a strong effect. The 3 studies included 2 cross-sectional studies (1 cross-sectional screening survey study and 1 case–control screening survey study) and 1 longitudinal study (1 longitudinal study with a time-series design).

The aim of the study by He et al. (2017) was to investigate the relationship between excessive social media use and gray matter volume in key neural systems. For this purpose, the behavioral pattern of social media use of the 50 study participants was determined by a Facebook-specific adaptation of the Compulsive Internet Use Instrument (Meerkerk et al., 2009; Turel et al., 2014), and participants were then categorized into a low or high behavior pattern of excessive social media use using a median split. The results of the region-of-interest analysis showed that in the case group (relatively high scores for excessive Facebook use compared to control group with relatively low scores), gray matter volume was decreased in both the bilateral amygdala and the right ventral striatum compared to the control group. There was a negative correlation between excessive Facebook use and the gray matter volume of the left amygdala, right amygdala, and right ventral striatum. No differences or correlations were found in prefrontal regions between the two groups.

The study by He et al. (2018) examined the association between excessive social media use and the impaired integrity of the white matter of the corpus callosum. After participants completed a questionnaire on demographics, data on Facebook use, and excessive Facebook use, as well as a structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) scan was collected. Region-of-interest analysis revealed significant positive correlations between excessive Facebook use and mean diffusivity in both the body and the splenium of corpus callosum. However, the correlation with the mean diffusivity in the body of corpus callosum and excessive Facebook use was no longer significant after FDR correction. Also, fractional anisotropy of the right corticospinal tract and mean diffusivity of the left superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and left forceps minor correlated positively with excessive Facebook use. Correlations between the mean diffusivity in the genu of corpus callosum and excessive Facebook as well as fractional anisotropy in the body, genu and splenium of corpus callosum and excessive Facebook use were not significant.

Montag et al. (2017) investigated the relationship between actual Facebook use and the nucleus accumbens. The nucleus accumbens, the major component of the ventral striatum, plays an important role in mediating emotion and motivation and modulating reward and pleasure processing, and also functions as an important limbic-motor interface (Cohen et al., 2009; Salgado and Kaplitt, 2015). It has also been linked to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depression, Parkinson’s disease, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse and dependence (Salgado and Kaplitt, 2015). Participants underwent sMRI at the beginning of the study and completed a questionnaire to determine addictive tendencies when using online social networks. Then, a self-developed application called “Menthal” was installed on the smartphone of all participating subjects to record user behavior on smartphones (for details of the application, please see Andone et al., 2016a,b). This application was used to record the duration of daily Facebook use and the frequency of daily Facebook app use over a five-week period. Significant negative correlations were found between both the duration of Facebook use and the gray matter volume of the left and right nucleus accumbens and between the frequency of Facebook use and the gray matter volume of the left and right nucleus accumbens. To control for brain volume, Montag et al. (2017) performed an additional calculation in which the ratio between the nucleus accumbens of the left/right hemisphere and the gray matter of each hemisphere was calculated. A significant relationship regarding Facebook use duration could only be found for the gray matter volume of left accumbens. The frequency of Facebook use correlated significantly with both the gray matter volume of left accumbens and the right accumbens. No significant correlation was found between the duration and frequency of Facebook use and the gray matter volumes of the left or right amygdala or hippocampus as control regions.

3.2.3. Affective experience state

Three studies were found that examined the physiological effects of Facebook use on affective experience state. Results varied, ranging from a small effect to a strong effect. The 3 studies included 3 experimental studies (2 experimental studies with an RCT design and 1 quasi-experiment).

Cipresso et al. (2015) investigated users’ subjective experience of Facebook navigation via PC and via smartphone using physiological measurements. All participants underwent three conditions, namely relaxation, free navigation on Facebook, and stress (in the form of performing a Stroop task). Results show that Facebook was not perceived as disruptive, rather it was perceived as positive and activating. Facebook was found not to cause stress, instead eliciting positive emotional valence along with increased physiological arousal during Facebook navigation.

Mauri et al. (2011) examined whether Facebook use elicited a specific psychophysiological activation pattern. As an initial stimulus, participants were shown a series of panoramic images for relaxation. They were then allowed to move freely on Facebook for 3 min. This was followed by a stress phase, which included a Stroop task and a math task. The Facebook navigation scores showed different trends, except for the scores related to breathing and EEG beta waves. These were almost exactly between the values for relaxation and stress. Skin conductance values for Facebook navigation were very similar to the stress condition. Moreover, regarding the heart interbeat interval, the relaxation and Facebook conditions were almost identical. The lowest values for pupil dilation (less dilation is interpreted as less activation of the sympathetic part of the autonomic nervous system) and electromyography activity from Corrugator Supercilii were measured during Facebook navigation (note that Corrugator Supercilii muscle activity is considered a measure of emotional valence; it usually decreases in response to positive emotions and it increases in response to negative emotions; e.g., Neta et al., 2009). Thus, this study found that there was a significant difference between the Facebook experience and the relaxation and stress conditions for many indices of somatic activity, and that Facebook use produced a state characterized by positive emotion and high arousal.

The study by Rauch et al. (2014) examined the effects of Facebook exposure through a subsequent face-to-face situation with a stimulus person on physiological arousal levels. Approximately 1 week prior to the experimental session, participants were asked to complete a social anxiety survey. During the experimental session, skin conductance was used to measure physiological arousal levels while exposed to a person via Facebook, face-to-face, or both. Results showed that prior exposure to a Facebook stimulus led to increased physiological arousal during a face-to-face contact, especially in individuals with high social anxiety.

4. Review discussion

We contribute to research by providing an in-depth comprehension of the scope, range, and nature of the existing literature on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. Specifically, we report evidence on how Facebook use is associated with eight identified psychological (perceived anxiety, perceived depression, perceived loneliness, perceived eating disorders, perceived self-esteem, perceived life satisfaction, perceived insomnia, and perceived stress) and three physiological (physiological stress, human brain alteration, and affective experience state) effects. Overall, the literature search process represents a systematic and methodologically rigorous process for examining the psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use.

The social network of Facebook is used for various reasons, such as communication (Aydın et al., 2013), entertainment (Ögel-Balaban and Altan, 2020), friendship (Rae and Lonborg, 2015), or social inclusion (Teppers et al., 2014). The main implication for research is that the results of this review suggest that the various psychological and physiological effects depend on the type of Facebook use. Facebook addiction, as a negative consequence of an excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use, is highly associated with the identified effects. For example, a significant positive association was found between Facebook addiction and perceived stress (Brailovskaia et al., 2019c). Negative psychological and physiological effects caused by excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use behavior may also develop over time. As evidence for this conclusion, we rely on a longitudinal study by Brailovskaia and Margraf (2017), who found a significant positive association between Facebook addiction and perceived anxiety, perceived depression, and perceived stress in a German student sample over a one-year period, although the extent of Facebook use did not change noticeably. The same study also revealed that the number of individuals with problematic Facebook use behavior can increase significantly within 1 year. However, research has also found approaches to counteract the negative effects. For example, a study by Brailovskaia et al. (2020b) found that reducing daily Facebook use even over a 14-day period can significantly reduce depressive symptoms while significantly increasing life satisfaction. This finding is supported by other studies that showed that a temporary absence from Facebook can significantly increase life satisfaction (Tromholt, 2016) and also reduce the cortisol level as indicator of physiological stress (Vanman et al., 2018). Given the potential risks of excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use, this review therefore provides a fundamental understanding of the psychological (see Table 2) and physiological (see Table 3) effects of Facebook use based on empirical research.

From a practical perspective, our paper highlights the importance of the knowledge on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. We note, though, that the results are also temporary in nature, as research in this area will also face new challenges. One of these challenges, which has been increasingly observed in scientific research and practice in recent years, is the individual habit of constantly checking IT devices for new information to stay always up-to-date (Stangl and Riedl, 2023c). In this regard, mobile technologies (e.g., smartphone) are particularly problematic, as auditory and/or visual notifications (Tams et al., 2020) have the potential to contribute to the development of addictive behavioral tendencies (e.g., looking at the smartphone every few minutes for a new SNS notification; Sha et al., 2019). Here, insights into the appearance of different modalities of Facebook-induced notifications would also be valuable for interruption science, an interdisciplinary research field that systematically investigates the prevalent phenomenon of interruptions (Stangl and Riedl, 2023b, 2023e). However, research has shown that users turn on their smartphone screens 88 times a day, with SNSs accounting for the majority of the average 2.5 h of mobile phone usage (Markowetz, 2015). Such behavior may be considered as an additional excessive and uncontrolled Facebook use behavior, which Keller et al. (2021) characteristically refers to as “lack of control about one’s smartphone use” (p. 2). As an implication for practice, further research activities and findings on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use, including a focus on mobile technologies, are therefore particularly valuable, which in turn will lead to the discovery of additional SNS-relevant constructs.

4.1. Potentials for future research activities

Building on the research results of our scoping review, we derived five major potentials for future research activities.

Potential 1: Additional Neuroscientific and Neurophysiological Studies – As first potential for future research activities, we highlight the value of neuroscientific and neurophysiological studies to further investigate Facebook use behavior and the identified psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. Indeed, to determine how and why certain psychological or physiological effects occur during Facebook use, neuroscience and neurophysiological tools and methods used in the interdisciplinary scientific field of NeuroIS can contribute to enhancing our understanding of human cognition, emotion, and behavior (Riedl et al., 2010, 2014, 2017; Dimoka et al., 2012; Riedl and Léger, 2016). For example, Triệu et al. (2021) used eye-tracking data and found that individuals with more social content on their Facebook newsfeed who spent a longer time viewing other Facebook postings and clicking more on other Facebook postings reported lower self-esteem than individuals who used Facebook less intensively. From a methodological perspective, however, NeuroIS studies usually combine data from neurophysiological measurements with self-report data to investigate underlying effects and users’ cognitive and affective processes in human-computer interaction in more detail (Loos et al., 2010; Riedl et al., 2010, 2014, 2017; Dimoka et al., 2012; Riedl and Léger, 2016). As an example, Morin-Major et al. (2016) examined Facebook use behavior by combining salivary cortisol samples as a physiological measure and self-reported data collected with validated questionnaires measuring psychological measures. Therefore, to better understand Facebook use and its underlying behavior, future research activities using neuroscientific and neurophysiological knowledge and tools seems promising to expand and systematically examine in more detail our understanding of the psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use and its consequences.

Potential 2: Insights through Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing Principles – Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing refer to studying a person’s digital footprints as an extended phenotype of a person (Jain et al., 2015) providing insights into diverse psychological characteristics (Baumeister and Montag, 2023). In particular, people’s digital footprints on Facebook, which are produced in the course of creating and maintaining personal profiles, can provide revealing information about many psychologically relevant characteristics such as personality (Marengo and Montag, 2020), perhaps even into human neurobiology (Montag et al., 2021b) and further our understanding of molecular processes in the human brain (Montag and Quintana, 2023), with the latter giving way to digital biomarkers. While the term “digital biomarker” is currently poorly defined in the literature (Montag et al., 2021a), digital biomarkers have the potential to provide direct insights into underlying human neurobiology (Montag et al., 2021b), which is relevant given the increasing importance of the consumer-centric perspective in digital health (Agarwal et al., 2020). For example, it has been shown that Facebook language data can be used to predict and diagnose early stage of depression (Eichstaedt et al., 2018), a condition being critically linked to diverse brain processes (Fries et al., 2023). From a NeuroIS perspective, however, neurophysiological data, such as heart rate and heart rate variability as physiological indicators measuring autonomic nervous system activity, can additionally contribute to a deeper understanding for various measurement purposes, such as perceived anxiety or perceived stress (Stangl and Riedl, 2022b). Here, measures related to the brain and human body in general could also gain relevance in future empirical research on digital detoxing (Stangl and Riedl, 2023d), which is a strategy to counteract the negative effects of digital technology use; this topic has received significant attention in both scientific research and practice in the recent past (Mirbabaie et al., 2022). Digital detoxing involves temporary or complete disengagement from digital technologies (e.g., temporary abstinence from Facebook), along with strategies to reduce exposure to them (e.g., reduction in time spent on Facebook) (Hager et al., 2023; Stangl and Riedl, 2023a,d).Importantly, ongoing technological progress has also opened up many possibilities of mobile measurements for biomarker detection and monitoring (Baumeister and Montag, 2023), such as novel methods (e.g., smart clothing) for data collection of physiological indicators (Stangl and Riedl, 2022a). However, general quality criteria for measurement methods in psychometrics and psychophysiology (Riedl et al., 2014), such as reliability and validity of wearable devices (Stangl and Riedl, 2022c), along with ethical, legal, and societal implications (Dagum and Montag, 2019; Montag et al., 2020a) need to be carefully considered and assessed beforehand. Future research activities using digital biomarkers as part of a neuroscientific study design to establish associations between human neurobiology and the digital footprints generated by users’ interactions to explore negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use behavior, though, appear promising for advancing research in this area.

Potential 3: Insights through Multimethod Research – As a third potential for future research, we emphasize the possibilities of multimethod research. In fact, the results of our review show that most studies on Facebook use behavior are cross-sectional survey studies (80%), while only a small proportion of all studies are longitudinal (13%), experimental (5%), or studies with a multimethod research design (2%). An example of multimethod research is the study by Ozimek and Bierhoff (2020), who used an experimental study with an RCT design and two survey studies to investigate short-term and long-term effects of using Facebook for comparative social comparison on self-esteem and depressive tendencies. This research approach showed both correlational and experimental evidence of a mediating association between Facebook use and depressive tendencies via ability-related comparisons and lower self-esteem. Another conceivable approach is the use of neurophysiological measures, which can play an important role in research designs as complementary and supplementary measures to gain a deeper understanding of the cognitive and affective processes that occur when individuals interact with Facebook. This perspective is also supported by seminal contributions to the NeuroIS research agenda (e.g., Dimoka et al., 2012). Drawing upon the neuroscience and neurophysiological tools and methods used in NeuroIS, researchers have a variety of measurement approaches at their disposal to study human neurophysiology in the context of Facebook use behavior. The instruments and methods that are applicable in such a research context can be broadly divided into measurement of the central nervous system, measurement of the peripheral nervous system, and measurement of the hormone system (for an overview of neurophysiological tools with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each measurement method per research setting, please see Riedl & Léger (2016, pp. 47-72); for a more detailed discussion of methods used in cognitive neuroscience, please see Senior et al. (2009). However, consistent with the finding of another recent descriptive literature review of neuroscience research on human-smartphone interactions and the digital footprints users leave in their interactions with SNSs (Montag et al., 2021b), neuroscience research tends to be a laggard as a research approach for examining Facebook use behavior. In fact, our review found only 14 studies (i.e., Mauri et al., 2011; Moreno et al., 2014; Rauch et al., 2014; Cipresso et al., 2015, 2019; Morin-Major et al., 2016; He et al., 2017, 2018; Montag et al., 2017; Rus and Tiemensma, 2017, 2018; Afifi et al., 2018; Vanman et al., 2018; Triệu et al., 2021) that applied neurophysiological measurements in their study. Therefore, research that considers neurophysiological measures as an adjunct in the context of multimethod research offers a promising future research activity to examine Facebook use behavior in a more detailed and systematic manner.

Potential 4: Extension of Review Results – The fourth potential for future research activities relates to the extension of our review results. In this review, we considered the empirical literature on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use published before and in April 2022. An extended analysis of empirical studies on other SNSs such as Instagram or Twitter, though, may lead to further insights into the negative psychological and physiological effects of SNSs. This is of particular relevance, because social media platforms differ in their designs/addictive potential and might attract also different user groups (Marengo et al., 2020; Rozgonjuk et al., 2021b): Statistics show that global audiences of SNSs differ by age and gender. For example, 9.3 percent of the Facebook audience was women aged 18 to 24 (Statista, 2022b), with the Instagram audience in that demographic accounting for 13.4% (Statista, 2022c). Extending our review methodology with a focus on other SNSs may reveal additional negative SNS-related constructs, providing a bird’s eye view of negative psychological and physiological effects of SNSs. Another conceivable approach is to replicate our review methodology in the future. As research on Facebook use behavior continues to encounter new aspects over time, even the negative psychological and physiological constructs we identified are to some extent transitory. However, future desktop research that either extends our research findings to other SNSs using our research methodology or replicates our original review methodology may uncover additional SNS-relevant constructs to the negative psychological and physiological effects we identified. Overall, the opportunities highlighted to extend our review findings are another promising activity for future research.

Potential 5: Considering the Data Business Model – Much research in the past has not focused on the actual culprit impacting in negative ways upon human behavior and society including development of addictive behaviors when interacting with social media platforms such as Facebook (Montag and Hegelich, 2020): The current prevailing model to pay for use allowance of a social media service foresees that users pay with their data, which in turn is used for microtargeting. This data business model, also named surveillance capitalism (Zuboff, 2015), led to the creation of highly immersive platforms which have been designed over many years via AB-testing (Montag et al., 2019). Understanding why humans act as they do on the social media platforms needs to take into account the design elements in-built on these platforms (Sindermann et al., 2022). This is often very difficult at the moment, as APIs are often closed and so social media remains a black box (Montag et al., 2021a). Studying digital footprints of online users (see also Potential 2) when they are interacting with the platform by also using ecological momentary assessment reports will be of tremendous importance to understand the effects of social media use on well-being and other psychological variables. A meta-analysis showed that assessment of technology use via self-report and objective recordings can differ (Parry et al., 2021). For further complexities in this research area see also the work by Kross et al. (2021) and Montag et al. (2021d). Finally, we mention that Potential 5 - as outlined in this section - will be also of high relevance to understand what healthier social media environments might look like (Dhawan et al., 2022).

4.2. Mitigation of validity concerns of research results

5. Concluding statement

The goal of this scoping review was to examine the scope, range, and nature of prior research on the negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use. Our systematic and methodologically rigorous literature search process allowed us to identify eight psychological effects (perceived anxiety, perceived depression, perceived loneliness, perceived eating disorders, perceived self-esteem, perceived life satisfaction, perceived insomnia, and perceived stress) and three physiological effects (physiological stress, human brain alteration, and affective experience state) of Facebook use. Overall, this review lays a valuable foundation for future research activities, as it also captures characteristics of prior empirical research by construct, including research design, sample, age, measures, and strength of associations between Facebook use and its effects for better understanding Facebook use from psychological and physiological perspectives.

Consistent with the findings of a recent article on the influence of SNS use on well-being (Verduyn et al., 2022), our review revealed that Facebook use may be beneficial to some extent on a psychological or physiological level. However, the (over-)use of Facebook also poses a myriad of detrimental and significant risks, both psychologically (see Table 2) and physiologically (see Table 3). It is therefore crucial to study Facebook use behavior in a more detailed and systematic manner, as prior empirical studies have shown that excessive and uncontrolled use behavior can lead to the development of problematic Facebook use with various negative psychological and physiological effects. To this end, we have described potential avenues for future research. Importantly, we anticipate that future research may also identify additional SNS-related constructs and user characteristics (e.g., personality) that moderate these effects. Future research should also consider experimental designs with neurophysiological measurements as complements to self-report and behavioral measures to draw more definitive conclusions about the effects (see Potential 1 and Potential 3). Moreover, future studies must not ignore potential changes in Facebook’s business model, because such changes may have significant effects on addictive behaviors that result from interaction with the specific features of the Facebook app (see Potential 5). Also, technological progress may increasingly allow longitudinal studies to discover and establish associations between human neurobiology and digital footprints generated by user interactions to examine and even detect early negative psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use behavior in a consumer-centric perspective of digital health (see Potential 2). Another promising activity for future research is to extend our findings to other SNSs (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, or Twitter), which would provide a bird’s eye view of negative psychological and physiological effects that could also lead to the discovery of additional SNS-related constructs (see Potential 4). Thus, it will be interesting to see how scientific research on the psychological and physiological effects of Facebook use will continue to develop.

Funding

RR’s research is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) as part of the project “Technostress in Organizations” (project number: P 30865) and by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) as part of the project “Interruption” at the University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  AbendR.DanO.MaozK.RazS.Bar-HaimY. (2014). Reliability, validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry45, 447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.06.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AdnanH. M.MaviS. R. (2015). Facebook satisfaction, life satisfaction: Malaysian undergraduate experience. Malays. J. Commun.31, 649–671.

  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AfifiT. D.ZamanzadehN.HarrisonK.Acevedo CallejasM. L. (2018). WIRED: the impact of media and technology use on stress (cortisol) and inflammation (interleukin IL-6) in fast paced families. Comput. Hum. Behav.81, 265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AgarwalR.DugasM.GaoG.KannanP. K. (2020). Emerging technologies and analytics for a new era of value-centered marketing in healthcare. J. Acad. Mark. Sci.48, 9–23. doi: 10.1007/s11747-019-00692-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AhamedA. F. M. J.LimbuY. B.MamunM. A. (2021). Facebook usage intensity and compulsive buying tendency: the mediating role of envy, self-esteem, and self-promotion and the moderating role of depression. Int. J. Elect. Market. Retailing12, 69–88. doi: 10.1504/IJEMR.2021.112255

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AhmedO. (2018). Relationship between loneliness and mental health among first-year undergraduate students: mediating role of timeline browsing and chatting on Facebook. Int. J. Contemp. Educ.1, 86–94. doi: 10.11114/ijce.v1i2.3625

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AhmedO.HossainM. A. (2018). The Bangla UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AkınA.AkınU. (2015). The mediating role of social safeness on the relationship between Facebook® use and life satisfaction. Psychol. Rep.117, 341–353. doi: 10.2466/18.07.PR0.117c20z9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AkınA.ÇetinB. (2007). The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS): the study of validity and reliability. Educ. Sci.Theory Pract.7, 260–268.

  • Google Scholar

• 10

  AkınA.Demirciİ.AkınU.OcakciH.AkdenizC.AkbasZ. S. (2013). “Turkish version of the Facebook Addiction Scale.” in Proceedings of the 13th European Congress of Psychology.

  • Google Scholar

• 11

  AkınA.Demirciİ.KaraS. (2017). Facebook bağimliliği ölçeği nin türkçe formunun geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi59, 65–72.

  • Google Scholar

• 12

  AlfasiY. (2019). The grass is always greener on my Friends’ profiles: the effect of Facebook social comparison on state self-esteem and depression. Personal. Individ. Differ.147, 111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Ali-HassanH.NevoD.WadeM. (2015). Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: the role of social capital. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.24, 65–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  American Psychiatric Association (2013). Severity measure for Generalized Anxiety Disorder—Adult. Available at: https://www.psychiatry.org/FileLibrary/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM5_Severity-Measure-For-Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder-Adult.pdf [Acessed November 12, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 15

  American Psychiatric Association (2018). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5 update) (5th Ed). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Google Scholar

• 16

  AndoneI.BłaszkiewiczK.EibesM.TrendafilovB.MontagC.MarkowetzA. (2016a). “Menthal: a framework for mobile data collection and analysis.” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. pp. 624–629.

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  AndoneI.BłaszkiewiczK.TrendafilovB.EibeM.MontagC.MarkowetzA. (2016b). “Menthal - running a science project as a start-up.” in Proceedings of the Computing in Mental Health, Workshop at CHI.

  • Google Scholar

• 18

  AndreassenC. S.TorsheimT.BrunborgG. S.PallesenS. (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychol. Rep.110, 501–517. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  AndresenE. M.MalmgrenJ. A.CarterW. B.PatrickD. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am. J. Prev. Med.10, 77–84. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  AtroszkoP. A. (2015). The structure of study addiction: selected risk factors and the relationship with stress, stress coping and psychosocial functioning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Gdansk.

  • Google Scholar

• 21

  AtroszkoP. A.AndreassenC. S.GriffithsM. D.PallesenS. (2015). Study addiction — a new area of psychological study: conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings. J. Behav. Addict.4, 75–84. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  AtroszkoP. A.BalcerowskaJ. M.BereznowskiP.BiernatowskaA.PallesenS.Schou AndreassenC. (2018). Facebook addiction among Polish undergraduate students: validity of measurement and relationship with personality and well-being. Comput. Hum. Behav.85, 329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  AtroszkoP. A.El AbiddineF. Z.MalikS.MamunM. A.VallyZ.CzerwińskiS. K. (2022). Lack of measurement invariance in a widely used Facebook addiction scale may thwart progress in research on social-network-use disorder: a cross-cultural study. Comput. Hum. Behav.128:107132. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107132

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  AtroszkoP. A.SawickiA.SendalL.AtroszkoB. (2017). “Further validation of single-item self-report measure of satisfaction with life.” in Proceedings of the 7th Comparative European Research Conference. pp. 107–110.

  • Google Scholar

• 25

  AungE. E. S.TinO. (2020). Facebook addiction and loneliness of university students from Sagaing District. J. Myanmar Acad. Arts Sci.18, 353–367.

  • Google Scholar

• 26

  AwobamiseA.JarrarY.NwekeG. E. (2022). Social communication apprehension, self-esteem and Facebook addiction among university students in Uganda. Contemp. Educ. Technol.14:ep354. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/11542

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  AydınG. S.MuyanM.DemirA. (2013). The investigation of Facebook usage purposes and shyness, loneliness. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.93, 737–741. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  AyyagariR.GroverV.PurvisR. (2011). Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q.35, 831–858. doi: 10.2307/41409963

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  AzevedoÂ. S.FariaL. (2004). “A auto-estima no ensino secundário: validação da Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.” in Proceedings of the 10th Conferência Internacional Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos. pp. 415–421.

  • Google Scholar

• 30

  BaekY. M.BaeY.JangH. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.16, 512–517. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  BaisD. M.ReyesM. E. S. (2020). Psychological predictors of Facebook addiction tendencies among Filipino millennials in Metro Manila. IAFOR J. Psychol. Behav. Sci.5, 37–56. doi: 10.22492/ijpbs.5.2.03

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  BakerL. R.OswaldD. L. (2010). Shyness and online social networking services. J. Soc. Pers. Relat.27, 873–889. doi: 10.1177/0265407510375261

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  BalcerowskaJ. M.BereznowskiP.BiernatowskaA.AtroszkoP. A.PallesenS.AndreassenC. S. (2022). Is it meaningful to distinguish between Facebook addiction and social networking sites addiction? Psychometric analysis of Facebook addiction and social networking sites addiction scales. Curr. Psychol.41, 949–962. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00625-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  BalcıŞ.GölcüA. (2013). Facebook addiction among university students in Turkey: Selcuk university example. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi1, 255–278.

  • Google Scholar

• 35

  BardiC. A.BradyM. F. (2010). Why shy people use instant messaging: loneliness and other motives. Comput. Hum. Behav.26, 1722–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  BarreraM.Jr.SandierI. N.RamsayT. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: studies on college students. Am. J. Community Psychol.9, 435–447.

  • Google Scholar

• 37

  BasiliscoR.ChaK. J. (2015). Uses and gratification motivation for using Facebook and the impact of Facebook usage on social capital and life satisfaction among Filipino users. Int. J. Software Eng. Applic.9, 181–194.

  • Google Scholar

• 38

  BaşogluM.ŞalcıogluE.LivanouM.ÖzerenM.AkerT.KılıçC.et al. (2001). A study of the validity of a screening instrument for traumatic stress in earthquake survivors in Turkey. J. Trauma. Stress.14, 491–509. doi: 10.1023/A:1011156505957

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  BastienC. H.VallièresA.MorinC. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med.2, 297–307. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  BaturayM. H.TokerS. (2017). Self-esteem shapes the impact of GPA and general health on Facebook addiction: a mediation analysis. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev.35, 555–575. doi: 10.1177/0894439316656606

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  BaumeisterH.MontagC. (2023). “Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing in psychoinformatics—a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary research endeavor” in Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing: New Developments in Psychoinformatics (SNPBE, 2nd Ed). eds. MontagC.BaumeisterH. (Cham: Springer), 1–9.

  • Google Scholar

• 42

  BeckA. T.RialW. Y.RickelsK. (1974). Short form of depression inventory: cross-validation. Psychol. Rep.34, 1184–1186. doi: 10.1177/003329417403403s01

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

  • Google Scholar

• 44

  BeckA. T.WardC. H.MendelsonM.MockJ.ErbaughJ. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry4, 561–571. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  BeckerJ.-M.RaiA.RingleC. M.VölcknerF. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Q.37, 665–694. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.01

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  BendayanR.Blanca MenaM. J. (2019). Spanish version of the Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire. Psicothema31, 204–209. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.301

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  BergagnaE.TartagliaS. (2018). Self-esteem, social comparison, and Facebook use. Eur. J. Psychol.14, 831–845. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1592

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  BevanJ. L.GomezR.SparksL. (2014). Disclosures about important life events on Facebook: relationships with stress and quality of life. Comput. Hum. Behav.39, 246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  BezinovićP. (1988). Prikaz skala za merenje nekih aspekata samopoimanja: praktikum iz kognitivne i bihejvioralne terapije. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Google Scholar

• 50

  BillieuxJ.SchimmentiA.KhazaalY.MaurageP.HeerenA. (2015). Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J. Behav. Addict.4, 119–123. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  BiolcatiR.ManciniG.PupiV.MughedduV. (2018). Facebook addiction: onset predictors. J. Clin. Med.7:118. doi: 10.3390/jcm7060118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA. (2018). Facebook intrusion, fear of missing out, narcissism, and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res.259, 514–519. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA. (2019). Be aware! If you start using Facebook problematically you will feel lonely: phubbing, loneliness, self-esteem, and Facebook intrusion. A cross-sectional study. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev.37, 270–278. doi: 10.1177/0894439318754490

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.BenvenutiM.CannataD.CiobanuA. M.Senol-DurakE.et al. (2016a). An international perspective on Facebook intrusion. Psychiatry Res.242, 385–387. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.BenvenutiM.MazzoniE.SeidmanG. (2019). Relations between Facebook intrusion, Internet addiction, life satisfaction, and self-esteem: a study in Italy and the USA. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict.17, 793–805. doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-0038-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.BoruchW.BałakierE. (2016b). Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people. Personal. Individ. Differ.94, 26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.CudoA. (2021). The relations between Facebook intrusion, emotional functioning, and health problems. Curr. Psychol. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01374-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.PanticI. (2015). Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur. Psychiatry30, 681–684. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.PanticI. (2016c). Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Comput. Hum. Behav.55, 701–705. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.RudnickaP. (2016d). Narcissism and self-esteem as predictors of dimensions of Facebook use. Personal. Individ. Differ.90, 296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.WołońciejM.MahmoudA. B.HoldošJ.YafiE. (2018). Loneliness, friendship, and Facebook intrusion. A study in Poland, Slovakia, Syria, Malaysia, and Ecuador. Stud. Psychol.60, 183–194. doi: 10.21909/sp.2018.03.761

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  BodrožaB.JovanovićT. (2016). Validation of the new scale for measuring behaviors of Facebook users: Psycho-Social Aspects of Facebook Use (PSAFU). Comput. Hum. Behav.54, 425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Bonds-RaackeJ.RaackeJ. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individ. Differ. Res.8, 27–33.

  • Google Scholar

• 64

  BotegaN. J.BioM. R.ZomignaniM. A.GarciaC.Jr.PereiraW. A. B. (1995). Transtornos do humor em enfermaria de clínica médica e validação de escala de medida (HAD) de ansiedade e depressão. Rev. Saude Publica29, 359–363. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89101995000500004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  BrailovskaiaJ.MargrafJ. (2016). Comparing Facebook users and Facebook non-users: relationship between personality traits and mental health variables – an exploratory study. PLoS One11:e0166999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  BrailovskaiaJ.MargrafJ. (2017). Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students—a longitudinal approach. PLoS One12:e0189719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189719

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  BrailovskaiaJ.MargrafJ. (2019). I present myself and have a lot of Facebook-friends – am I a happy narcissist!?Personal. Individ. Differ.148, 11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  BrailovskaiaJ.MargrafJ.SchillackH.KöllnerV. (2019a). Comparing mental health of Facebook users and Facebook non-users in an inpatient sample in Germany. J. Affect. Disord.259, 376–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.078

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  BrailovskaiaJ.RohmannE.BierhoffH.-W.MargrafJ. (2018a). The brave blue world: Facebook flow and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD). PLoS One13:e0201484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201484

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  BrailovskaiaJ.RohmannE.BierhoffH.-W.MargrafJ. (2020a). The anxious addictive narcissist: the relationship between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, anxiety symptoms and Facebook addiction. PLoS One15:e0241632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241632

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  BrailovskaiaJ.RohmannE.BierhoffH.-W.MargrafJ.KöllnerV. (2019b). Relationships between addictive Facebook use, depressiveness, insomnia, and positive mental health in an inpatient sample: a German longitudinal study. J. Behav. Addict.8, 703–713. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.63

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  BrailovskaiaJ.RohmannE.BierhoffH.-W.SchillackH.MargrafJ. (2019c). The relationship between daily stress, social support and Facebook Addiction Disorder. Psychiatry Res.276, 167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  BrailovskaiaJ.StröseF.SchillackH.MargrafJ. (2020b). Less Facebook use – more well-being and a healthier lifestyle? An experimental intervention study. Comput. Hum. Behav.108:106332. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106332

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  BrailovskaiaJ.TeismannT.MargrafJ. (2018b). Physical activity mediates the association between daily stress and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) – a longitudinal approach among German students. Comput. Hum. Behav.86, 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  BrailovskaiaJ.VeltenJ.MargrafJ. (2019d). Relationship between daily stress, depression symptoms, and Facebook addiction disorder in Germany and in the United States. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.22, 610–614. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0165

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  BrandtzægP. B.HeimJ. (2009). “Why people use social networking sites” in Online Communities and Social Computing: Third International Conference, OCSC 2009, Held as Part of HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19-24, 2009, Proceedings (LNCS, Vol. 5621). eds. OzokA. A.ZaphirisP. (Heidelberg: Springer), 143–152.

  • Google Scholar

• 77

  BrownR. M.RobertsS. G. B.PolletT. V. (2021). Loneliness is negatively related to Facebook network size, but not related to Facebook network structure. Cyberpsychology15. doi: 10.5817/CP2021-2-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  BrunotS.JuhelJ. (2012). Comparaisons sociales et temporelles, estime de soi et activité de recherche d’emploi en situation de chômage de longue durée. Ann. Psychol.2, 197–226.

  • Google Scholar

• 79

  BurkeM.ChengJ.de GantB. (2020). “Social comparison and Facebook: feedback, positivity, and opportunities for comparison.” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1–13.

  • Google Scholar

• 80

  BurkeM.KrautR.MarlowC. (2011). “Social capital on Facebook: differentiating uses and users.” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 571–580.

  • Google Scholar

• 81

  BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). “Social network activity and social well-being.” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1909–1912.

  • Google Scholar

• 82

  BuunkB. P.YbemaJ. F.GibbonsF. X.IpenburgM. (2001). The affective consequences of social comparison as related to professional burnout and social comparison orientation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.31, 337–351. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.41

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  BuunkB. P.ZurriagaR.PeiroJ. M.NautaA.GosalvezI. (2005). Social comparisons at work as related to a cooperative social climate and to individual differences in social comparison orientation. Appl. Psychol.54, 61–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00196.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  BuysseD. J.ReynoldsC. F.MonkT. H.BermanS. R.KupferD. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res.28, 193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  ByrneD. G.DavenportS. C.MazanovJ. (2007). Profiles of adolescent stress: the development of the Adolescent Stress Questionnaire (ASQ). J. Adolesc.30, 393–416. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  ÇakıcıM.BabayiğitA.KaraazizM.CumhurÖ. (2020). The prevalence and risk factors of Facebook addiction: does Facebook addiction is related with depression and PTSD?Anatolian J. Psychiatry21, 245–252. doi: 10.5455/apd.2020101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  ÇamE. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitsel ve genel amaçlı Facebook kullanımları ve Facebook bağımlılıkları. Unpublished Master Thesis. Sakarya University.

  • Google Scholar

• 88

  CampisiJ.BynogP.McGeheeH.OaklandJ. C.QuirkS.TagaC.et al. (2012). Facebook, stress, and incidence of upper respiratory infection in undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.15, 675–681. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0156

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  CampisiJ.MayJ.BurchK.LarsonK.DoscherJ.DohertyS.et al. (2017). Anxiety-inducing Facebook behavior is associated with higher rates of upper respiratory infection in college-aged users. Comput. Hum. Behav.76, 211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  CanavarroM. (2007). “Inventário de Sintomas Psicopatológicos (BSI): uma revisão crítica dos estudos realizados em Portugal” in Avaliação Psicológica: Instrumentos validados para a população portuguesa (3rd Ed). eds. SimõesM.MachadoC.GonçalvesM.AlmeidaL. (Coimbra: Quarteto), 305–331.

  • Google Scholar

• 91

  CarbonellX.PanovaT. (2017). A critical consideration of social networking sites’ addiction potential. Addict. Res. Theory25, 48–57. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1197915

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  CarpenterC. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personal. Individ. Differ.52, 482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  CarterJ. C.StewartD. A.FairburnC. G. (2001). Eating disorder examination questionnaire: norms for young adolescent girls. Behav. Res. Ther.39, 625–632. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00033-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  Castillo de MesaJ.Gómez-JacintoL.López PeláezA.Erro-GarcésA. (2020). Social networking sites and youth transition: the use of Facebook and personal well-being of social work young graduates. Front. Psychol.11:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00230

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  CecenA. R. (2008). The effects of gender and loneliness levels on ways of coping among university students. Coll. Stud. J.42, 510–516.

  • Google Scholar

• 96

  ChabrolH.LaconiS.DelfourM.MoreauA. (2017). Contributions of psychopathological and interpersonal variables to problematic Facebook use in adolescents and young adults. Int. J. High Risk Behav. Addic.6:e32773. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.32773

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  CharzyńskaE.GóźdźJ. (2014). W sieci uzależnienia: Polska adaptacja skali uzależnienia od facebooka (the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale) C.S. Andreassen, T. Torsheima, G.S. Brunborga i S. Pallesena. Chowanna, 1(42), 163–185.

  • Google Scholar

• 98

  ChavezG. B.ChavezF. C.Jr. (2017). Relationship between Facebook addiction and loneliness of Filipino high school students. Liceo J. Higher Educ. Res.13, 51–60. doi: 10.7828/ljher.v13i1.1008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  ChenY.BelloR. S. (2017). Does receiving or providing social support on Facebook influence life satisfaction? Stress as mediator and self-esteem as moderator. Int. J. Commun.11, 2926–2939.

  • Google Scholar

• 100

  ChenW.LeeK.-H. (2013). Sharing, liking, commenting, and distressed? The pathway between Facebook interaction and psychological distress. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.16, 728–734. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  ChenS.-H.WengL.-J.SuY.-J.WuH.-M.YangP.-F. (2003). Development of a Chinese Internet Addiction Scale and its psychometric study. Chin. J. Psychol.45, 279–294.

  • Google Scholar

• 102

  ChoM.-H.JunS. H.ChoiE.-K. (2014). Effects of self-esteem, life satisfaction and gender on the self-presentation and social interaction motivations for Facebook use. J. Korea Contents Assoc.14, 513–528. doi: 10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.09.513

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  ChoiJ. (2022). Do Facebook and Instagram differ in their influence on life satisfaction? A study of college men and women in South Korea. Cyberpsychology16. doi: 10.5817/CP2022-1-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  ChouH.-T. G.EdgeN. (2012). “They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am”: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.15, 117–121. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0324

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  ChowT. S.WanH. Y. (2017). Is there any ‘Facebook Depression’? Exploring the moderating roles of neuroticism, Facebook social comparison and envy. Personal. Individ. Differ.119, 277–282. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  ChuangY.-W. (2020). Promoting consumer engagement in online communities through virtual experience and social identity. Sustainability12:855. doi: 10.3390/su12030855

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  ChươngL. T.MinhĐ. Đ.ThảoM. P. (2020). Độ tin cậy và tính giá trị của thang điểm đánh giá tình trạng nghiện Facebook của Đại học BERGEN phiên bản tiếng Việt (VIET-BFAS). Tạp Chí Y Học Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh1, 138–144.

  • Google Scholar

• 108

  CingelD. P.OlsenM. K. (2018). Getting over the hump: examining curvilinear relationships between adolescent self-esteem and Facebook use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media62, 215–231. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2018.1451860

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  CipressoP.MauriM.SemonellaM.TuenaC.BalgeraA.VillamiraM.et al. (2019). Looking at one’s self through Facebook increases mental stress: a computational psychometric analysis by using eye-tracking and psychophysiology. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.22, 307–314. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0602

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  CipressoP.SerinoS.GaggioliA.AlbaniG.MauroA.RivaG. (2015). Psychometric modeling of the pervasive use of Facebook through psychophysiological measures: stress or optimal experience?Comput. Hum. Behav.49, 576–587. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  ClaytonR. B.OsborneR. E.MillerB. K.OberleC. D. (2013). Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 687–693. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  CohenM. X.AxmacherN.LenartzD.ElgerC. E.SturmV.SchlaepferT. E. (2009). Neuroelectric signatures of reward learning and decision-making in the human nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology34, 1649–1658. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.222

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav.24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  CollaniG.HerzbergP. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwetgefühl von Rosenberg. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie24, 3–7. doi: 10.1024/0170-1789.24.1.3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  ConradB. (n.d.). Facebook Addiction Test. Available at: http://www.techaddiction.ca/facebook-addiction-test-symptoms.html [Accesed November 11, 2022]

  • Google Scholar

• 116

  CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (2008). “The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)” in The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Personality Measurement and Testing (Vol. 2). eds. BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (London: SAGE Publications Ltd.), 179–198.

  • Google Scholar

• 117

  CostelloC. G.ComreyA. L. (1967). Scales for measuring depression and anxiety. J. Psychol.66, 303–313. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1967.10544910

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  CramerE. M.SongH.DrentA. M. (2016). Social comparison on Facebook: motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue. Comput. Hum. Behav.64, 739–746. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  CudoA.KopiśN.FrancuzP.BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.TorójM. (2019). The impact of Facebook use and Facebook intrusion on cognitive control: effect in proactive and reactive control. Adv. Cogn. Psychol.15, 63–74. doi: 10.5709/acp-0257-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  CudoA.SzewczykM.BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA.Jarząbek-CudoA. (2020a). The role of depression and self-esteem in Facebook intrusion and gaming disorder among young adult gamers. Psychiatry Q.91, 65–76. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09685-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  CudoA.WojtasińskiM.TużnikP.GriffithsM. D.Zabielska-MendykE. (2020b). Problematic Facebook use and problematic video gaming as mediators of relationship between impulsivity and life satisfaction among female and male gamers. PLoS One15:e0237610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237610

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  ÇuhadaroğluF. (1986a). Self-esteem in adolescents. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Hacettepe University.

  • Google Scholar

• 123

  ÇuhadaroğluF. (1986b). Adolesan benlik saygısı. Unpublished Master Thesis. Hacettepe University.

  • Google Scholar

• 124

  CuryG. S. A.TakamuneD. M.HerreriasG. S. P.Rivera-SequeirosA.de BarrosJ. R.BaimaJ. P.et al. (2022). Clinical and psychological factors associated with addiction and compensatory use of Facebook among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Gen. Med.15, 1447–1457. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S334099

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  da VeigaG. F.SoteroL.PontesH. M.CunhaD.PortugalA.RelvasA. P. (2019). Emerging adults and Facebook use: the validation of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS). Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict.17, 279–294. doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-0018-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  DąbkowskaM. (2008). Wybrane aspekty lęku u ofiar przemocy domowej. Psychiatria5, 91–98.

  • Google Scholar

• 127

  DagumP.MontagC. (2019). “Ethical considerations of digital phenotyping from the perspective of a healthcare practitioner” in Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing: New Developments in Psychoinformatics (SNPBE). eds. MontagC.BaumeisterH. (Cham: Springer), 13–28.

  • Google Scholar

• 128

  DamotaM. D. (2019). The relationship between Facebook addiction and depression among Madda Walabu university summer students- cross sectional survey. New Media Mass Commun.78. doi: 10.7176/NMMC/78-01

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  DatuJ. A. D.ValdezJ. P.DatuN. (2012). Does facebooking make us sad? Hunting relationship between Facebook use and depression among Filipino adolescents. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ. Technol.1, 83–91. doi: 10.5861/ijrset.2012.202

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  DavidsonT.FarquharL. K. (2014). Correlates of social anxiety, religion, and Facebook. J. Media Religion13, 208–225. doi: 10.1080/15348423.2014.971566

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  de Jong-GierveldJ.KamphulsF. (1985). The development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale. Appl. Psychol. Meas.9, 289–299. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  DemirA. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi7, 14–18.

  • Google Scholar

• 133

  DempseyA. E.O’BrienK. D.TiamiyuM. F.ElhaiJ. D. (2019). Fear of Missing out (FoMO) and rumination mediate relations between social anxiety and problematic Facebook use. Addict. Behav. Rep.9:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100150

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  DentiL.BarbopoulosI.NilssonI.HolmbergL.ThulinM.WendebladM.et al. (2012). Sweden’s largest Facebook study. Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI-Rapport 2012:3).

  • Google Scholar

• 135

  DerogatisL. R.MelisaratosN. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol. Med.13, 595–605. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700048017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  DhawanS.HegelichS.SindermannC.MontagC. (2022). Re-start social media, but how?Telematics Inform. Rep.8:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  DhirA.KaurP.ChenS.PallesenS. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue. Int. J. Inf. Manag.48, 193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  DibbB.FosterM. (2021). Loneliness and Facebook use: the role of social comparison and rumination. Heliyon7:e05999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess.49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  DienerE.SuhE.OishiS. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian J. Clin. Psychol.24, 25–41.

  • Google Scholar

• 141

  DimokaA.DavisF. D.GuptaA.PavlouP. A.BankerR. D.DennisA. R.et al. (2012). On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Q.36, 679–702. doi: 10.2307/41703475

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  DiTommasoE.BrannenC. L.BestL. A. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educ. Psychol. Meas.64, 99–119. doi: 10.1177/0013164403258450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  DoğanT.ÇötokN. A.TekinE. G. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among university students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.15, 2058–2062. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  DurakM.Senol-DurakE.GencozT. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Soc. Indic. Res.99, 413–429. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  EcheburúaE. (1999). ¿Adicciones... sin drogas? Las nuevas adicciones: Juego, sexo, comida, compras, trabajo, Internet... Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.

  • Google Scholar

• 146

  EichstaedtJ. C.SmithR. J.MerchantR. M.UngarL. H.CrutchleyP.Preoţiuc-PietroD.et al. (2018). Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 11203–11208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802331115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2006). “Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital.” in Proceedings of the Conference of the International Communication Association.

  • Google Scholar

• 148

  EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2011). Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc.13, 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  EllisonN. B.VitakJ.GrayR.LampeC. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.19, 855–870. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12078

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  ElphinstonR. A.NollerP. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 631–635. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0318

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  ErrastiJ.AmigoI.VilladangosM. (2017). Emotional uses of Facebook and Twitter: its relation with empathy, narcissism, and self-esteem in adolescence. Psychol. Rep.120, 997–1018. doi: 10.1177/0033294117713496

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  EşkisuM.ÇamZ.GeliboluS.RasmussenK. R. (2020). Trait mindfulness as a protective factor in connections between psychological issues and Facebook addiction among Turkish university students. Stud. Psychol.62, 213–231. doi: 10.31577/sp.2020.03.801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  EşkisuM.HoşoğluR.RasmussenK. R. (2017). An investigation of the relationship between Facebook usage, Big Five, self-esteem and narcissism. Comput. Hum. Behav.69, 294–301. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  FairburnC. G.BeglinS. J. (1994). Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?Int. J. Eat. Disord.16, 363–370.

  • Google Scholar

• 156

  FairburnC. G.BeglinS. (2008). “Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0)” in Cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. ed. FairburnC. G. (New York: Guilford Press), 270–313.

  • Google Scholar

• 157

  FairburnC. G.CooperZ.O’ConnorM. E. (2008). “Eating disorder examination (edition 16.0D)” in Cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. ed. FairburnC. G. (New York: Guilford Press), 265–269.

  • Google Scholar

• 158

  FarahaniH. A.KazemiZ.AghamohamadiS.BakhtiarvandF.AnsariM. (2011). Examining mental health indices in students using Facebook in Iran. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.28, 811–814. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  FarandaM.RobertsL. D. (2019). Social comparisons on Facebook and offline: the relationship to depressive symptoms. Personal. Individ. Differ.141, 13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  FaraonM.KaipainenM. (2014). “Much more to it: the relation between Facebook usage and self-esteem.” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration. pp. 87–92.

  • Google Scholar

• 161

  FardoulyJ.VartanianL. R. (2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image12, 82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  FeinsteinB. A.HershenbergR.BhatiaV.LatackJ. A.MeuwlyN.DavilaJ. (2013). Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms: rumination as a mechanism. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult.2, 161–170. doi: 10.1037/a0033111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  FendH.HelmkeA.RichterP. (1984). Inventar zu Selbstkonzept und Selbstvertrauen. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Konstanz.

  • Google Scholar

• 164

  FenigsteinA.ScheierM. F.BussA. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: assessment and theory. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.43, 522–527. doi: 10.1037/h0076760

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  FioravantiG.CasaleS. (2020). The active and passive use of Facebook: measurement and association with Facebook addiction. Journal of Psychopathology26, 176–182. doi: 10.36148/2284-0249-329

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  FlanaginA. J. (2005). IM online: instant messaging use among college students. Commun. Res. Rep.22, 175–187. doi: 10.1080/00036810500206966

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  FlynnS.NooneC.SarmaK. M. (2018). An exploration of the link between adult attachment and problematic Facebook use. BMC Psychol.6:34. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0245-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  ForoughiB.IranmaneshM.NikbinD.HyunS. S. (2019). Are depression and social anxiety the missing link between Facebook addiction and life satisfaction? The interactive effect of needs and self-regulation. Telematics Inform.43:101247. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101247

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  FossatiA.BorroniS.Del CornoF. (2015a). “LEVEL 2 – Anxiety – Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress – Anxiety – Short Form)” in DSM-5: Scale di Valutazione Adulti. ed. American Psychiatric Association (Raffaello Cortina Editore).

  • Google Scholar

• 170

  FossatiA.BorroniS.Del CornoF. (2015b). “LEVEL 2 – Depression – Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress – Depression – Short Form)” in DSM-5: Scale di Valutazione Adulti. ed. American Psychiatric Association (Raffaello Cortina Editore)

  • Google Scholar

• 171

  FrancisJ. (2022). Elder orphans on Facebook: implications for mattering and social isolation. Comput. Hum. Behav.127:107023. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  FranckE.De RaedtR.BarbezC.RosseelY. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Psychol. Belgica48, 25–35. doi: 10.5334/pb-48-1-25

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  FriesG. R.SaldanaV. A.FinnsteinJ.ReinT. (2023). Molecular pathways of major depressive disorder converge on the synapse. Mol. Psychiatry28, 284–297. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01806-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  FrisonE.BastinM.BijttebierP.EggermontS. (2019). Helpful or harmful? The different relationships between private Facebook interactions and adolescents’ depressive symptoms. Media Psychol.22, 244–272. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2018.1429933

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  FrisonE.EggermontS. (2015). The impact of daily stress on adolescents’ depressed mood: the role of social support seeking through Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav.44, 315–325. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.070

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  FrisonE.EggermontS. (2016a). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev.34, 153–171. doi: 10.1177/0894439314567449

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  FrisonE.EggermontS. (2016b). “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger”: negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents’ life satisfaction are reciprocally related. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.19, 158–164. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0296

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  FrisonE.EggermontS. (2020). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Commun. Res.47, 701–728. doi: 10.1177/0093650215617506

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  FrostR. L.RickwoodD. J. (2017). A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav.76, 576–600. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  FuhrerR.RouillonF. (1989). La version française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation. Psychiatry and Psychobiology4, 163–166. doi: 10.1017/S0767399X00001590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  FydrichT.SommerG.TydecksS.BrählerE. (2009). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14). Z. Med. Psychol.18, 43–48.

  • Google Scholar

• 182

  GandarillasA.ZorrillaB.SepúlvedaA. R.MuñozP. E. (2003). Trastornos del comportamiento alimentario: prevalencia de casos en mujeres adolescentes de la Comunidad de Madrid. Documentos Técnicos de Salud Pública 85.

  • Google Scholar

• 183

  GarnerD. M.OlmsteadM. P.PolivyJ. (1983). Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int. J. Eat. Disord.2, 15–34. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(198321)2:2<15::AID-EAT2260020203>3.0.CO;2-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  GarnerD. M.OlmstedM. P.BohrY.GarfinkelP. E. (1982). The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol. Med.12, 871–878. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700049163

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  GersonJ.PlagnolA. C.CorrP. J. (2016). Subjective well-being and social media use: do personality traits moderate the impact of social comparison on Facebook?Comput. Hum. Behav.63, 813–822. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  GersonJ.PlagnolA. C.CorrP. J. (2017). Passive and Active Facebook Use Measure (PAUM): validation and relationship to the reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personal. Individ. Differ.117, 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  GhaliH.GhammemR.ZammitN.FredjS. B.AmmariF.MaatougJ.et al. (2022). Validation of the Arabic version of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale in Tunisian adolescents. International journal of adolescent. Med. Health34. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2019-0077

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  GiagkouS.HussainZ.PontesH. M. (2018). Exploring the interplay between passive following on Facebook, fear of missing out, self-esteem, social comparison, age, and life satisfaction in a community-based sample. Int. J. Psychol. Behav. Anal.4:149. doi: 10.15344/2455-3867/2018/149

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.76, 129–142. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  GiotaK. G.KleftarasG. (2013). “Facebook social support: a comparative study on depression and personality characteristics.” in Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on ICT, Society and Human Beings. pp. 37–44.

  • Google Scholar

• 191

  GlaesmerH.GrandeG.BraehlerE.RothM. (2011). The German version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess.27, 127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  GoldbergI. K. (1993). Questions & answers about depression and its treatment: A consultation with a leading psychiatrist. Philadelphia: Charles Press Publishers.

  • Google Scholar

• 193

  GoldbergD. P. B.HillierV. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol. Med.9, 139–145. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700021644

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  GoljovićN. (2017). “Personality traits, self-concept and life satisfaction in the context of Facebook use” in Proceedings of the 23rd Scientific Conference on Empirical Studies in Psychology. eds. ToškovićO.DamnjanovićK.LazarevićL., 96–102.

  • Google Scholar

• 195

  GonzalesA. L.HancockJ. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 79–83. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0411

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  González-NuevoC.CuestaM.MuñizJ. (2021). Concern about appearance on Instagram and Facebook: measurement and links with eating disorders. Cyberpsychology15:9. doi: 10.5817/CP2021-2-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  GräfeK.ZipfelS.HerzogW.LöweB. (2004). Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)”. Diagnostica50, 171–181. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.171

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  GrieveR.IndianM.WitteveenK.TolanG. A.MarringtonJ. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: can social connectedness be derived online?Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 604–609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  große DetersF.MehlM. R. (2013). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci.4, 579–586. doi: 10.1177/1948550612469233

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  GrygielP.HumennyG.RebiszS.ŚwitajP.SikorskaJ. (2013). Validating the polish adaptation of the 11-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess.29, 129–139. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  HagerN.StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023). “Digital detox research: an analysis of applied methods and implications for future studies” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik.

  • Google Scholar

• 202

  HallM.CatonS. (2017). Am I who I say I am? Unobtrusive self-representation and personality recognition on Facebook. PLoS One12:e0184417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184417

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  HannaE.WardL. M.SeabrookR. C.JeraldM.ReedL.GiaccardiS.et al. (2017). Contributions of social comparison and self-objectification in mediating associations between Facebook use and emergent adults’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.20, 172–179. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0247

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  HanprathetN.ManwongM.KhumsriJ.YingyeunR.PhanasathitM. (2015). Facebook addiction and its relationship with mental health among Thai high school students. J. Med. Assoc. Thail.98, 81–90.

  • Google Scholar

• 205

  HargittaiE.HsiehY. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Inf. Commun. Soc.13, 515–536. doi: 10.1080/13691181003639866

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  HartC. (1988). Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. London, Thousand Oaks and New Dehli: Sage Publications.

  • Google Scholar

• 207

  HaslamD. M.TeeA.BakerS. (2017). The use of social media as a mechanism of social support in parents. J. Child Fam. Stud.26, 2026–2037. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0716-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  HautzingerM.KellerF.KühnerC. (2006). BDI-II: Beck- Depressions-Inventar Manual. Frankfurt am Main: Harcourt Test Services.

  • Google Scholar

• 209

  HautzingerM.KellerF.KühnerC. (2009). BDI-II: Beck-Depressions-Inventar Revision (2nd Ed). Göttingen: PsychCorp.

  • Google Scholar

• 210

  HaysR. D.DiMatteoM. R. (1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. J. Pers. Assess.51, 69–81.

  • Google Scholar

• 211

  HeQ.TurelO.BecharaA. (2018). Association of excessive social media use with abnormal white matter integrity of the corpus callosum. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging278, 42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.06.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  HeQ.TurelO.BreversD.BecharaA. (2017). Excess social media use in normal populations is associated with amygdala-striatal but not with prefrontal morphology. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging269, 31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.09.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  Health and Retirement Study (2010). Health and retirement study: participant lifestyle questionnaire 2010. Available at: https://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/modules/meta/2010/core/qnaire/online/HRS2010_SAQ_Final.pdf [Accessed November 15, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 214

  HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.60, 895–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  HelgesonV. S.MickelsonK. D. (1995). Motives for social comparison. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.21, 1200–1209. doi: 10.1177/01461672952111008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  HendersonJ. C.SifonisJ. G. (1988). The value of strategic IS planning: understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets. MIS Q.12, 187–200. doi: 10.2307/248843

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  HessT.MattC.BenlianA.WiesböckF. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q. Exec.15, 123–139.

  • Google Scholar

• 218

  HewK. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav.27, 662–676. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  HisliN. (1988). Beck Depresyon Envanterinin gecerliligi uzerine bit calisma. Psikoloji Dergisi6, 118–122.

  • Google Scholar

• 220

  HisliN. (1989). Beck Depresyon Envanterinin universite ogrencileri icin gecerliligi, guvenilirligi. Psikoloji Dergisi7, 3–13.

  • Google Scholar

• 221

  HoT. T. Q. (2021a). Facebook addiction and depression: loneliness as a moderator and poor sleep quality as a mediator. Telematics Inform.61:101617. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101617

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  HoT. T. Q. (2021b). Facebook addiction partially mediated the association between stress symptoms and sleep disturbance among Facebook users. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00619-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  HoT. T. Q.NguyenB. P.NguyenT. N. B.PhamT. T. H.MaiT. T. T. (2021b). Facebook addiction disorder and sleep quality: loneliness as a mediator. Psychol. Educ. J.58, 4917–4927.

  • Google Scholar

• 224

  HoT. T. Q.HuynhS.VanTran-ChiV.-L. (2021a). Impact of problematic Facebook use, loneliness, and poor sleep quality on mental health. Int. J. Adv. Applied Sci., 8, 112–118. doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2021.09.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  HollenbaughE. E. (2011). Motives for maintaining personal journal blogs. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 13–20. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0403

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  HonK. Y.ChuaB. S. (2015). Are lonely undergraduate students avoiding communicating in real life but vigorous in Facebook. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci.5, 43–50.

  • Google Scholar

• 227

  HongF.-Y.HuangD.-H.LinH.-Y.ChiuS.-L. (2014). Analysis of the psychological traits, Facebook usage, and Facebook addiction model of Taiwanese university students. Telematics Inform.31, 597–606. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2014.01.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  HosenM. J.EvaS. A.RahmanM. M.IbrahimM.LiraU. F.HossainA. B.et al. (2021). Health impacts of excessive use of Facebook among university students in Bangladesh. Heliyon7:e07271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07271

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  HuX.KimA.SiwekN.WilderD. (2017). The Facebook paradox: effects of facebooking on individuals’ social relationships and psychological well-being. Front. Psychol.8:87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00087

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  HuebnerE. S. (1991). Initial development of the Student’s Life Satisfaction Scale. Sch. Psychol. Int.12, 231–240. doi: 10.1177/0143034391123010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL. C.CacioppoJ. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res. Aging26, 655–672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  HummelA. C.SmithA. R. (2015). Ask and you shall receive: desire and receipt of feedback via Facebook predicts disordered eating concerns. Int. J. Eat. Disord.48, 436–442. doi: 10.1002/eat.22336

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  HussainZ.SimonovicB.StuppleE.AustinM. (2019). Using eye tracking to explore Facebook use and associations with Facebook addiction, mental well-being, and personality. Behav. Sci.9:19. doi: 10.3390/bs9020019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  IlyasQ. S. M.AeyshaM. (2001). Bangali version of the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Unpublished Manuscript. University of Dhaka.

  • Google Scholar

• 235

  Inderbitzen-NolanH. M.WaltersK. S. (2000). Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents: normative data and further evidence of construct validity. J. Clin. Child Psychol.29, 360–371. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  IovuM.-B.RuncanR.RuncanP.-L.AndrioniF. (2020). Association between Facebook use, depression and family satisfaction: a cross-sectional study of romanian youth. Iran. J. Public Health49, 2111–2119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i11.4728

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  IrwinM.ArtinK. H.OxmanM. N. (1999). Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch. Intern. Med.159, 1701–1704. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.15.1701

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  JainS. H.PowersB. W.HawkinsJ. B.BrownsteinJ. S. (2015). The digital phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol.33, 462–463. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3223

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  JangJ.DworkinJ. (2014). Does social network site use matter for mothers? Implications for bonding and bridging capital. Comput. Hum. Behav.35, 489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  JangK.ParkN.SongH. (2016). Social comparison on Facebook: its antecedents and psychological outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav.62, 147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  JelenchickL. A.EickhoffJ.ChristakisD. A.BrownR. L.ZhangC.BensonM.et al. (2014). The Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS) for adolescents and young adults: scale development and refinement. Comput. Hum. Behav.35, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  Jenkins-GuarnieriM. A.WrightS. L.HudiburghL. M. (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol.33, 294–301. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243

  Jenkins-GuarnieriM. A.WrightS. L.JohnsonB. (2013). Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult.2, 38–50. doi: 10.1037/a0030277

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  Jeri-YabarA.Sanchez-CarbonelA.TitoK.Ramirez-del CastilloJ.Torres-AlcantaraA.DenegriD.et al. (2019). Association between social media use (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook) and depressive symptoms: are Twitter users at higher risk?Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry65, 14–19. doi: 10.1177/0020764018814270

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245

  JhaR. K.ShahD. K.BasnetS.PaudelK. R.SahP.SahA. K.et al. (2016). Facebook use and its effects on the life of health science students in a private medical college of Nepal. BMC. Res. Notes9:378. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2186-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  JinB. (2013). How lonely people use and perceive Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 2463–2470. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  JobeL. E.Williams WhiteS. (2007). Loneliness, social relationships, and a broader autism phenotype in college students. Personal. Individ. Differ.42, 1479–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  JoinsonA. N. (2008). “Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook.” in Proceedings of the 26th CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1027–1036.

  • Google Scholar

• 249

  JuczyńskiZ. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. Warsaw: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.

  • Google Scholar

• 250

  JuczyńskiZ. (2009). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia (2nd Ed). Warsaw: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.

  • Google Scholar

• 251

  JuncoR. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Comput. Educ.58, 162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252

  KahnemanD.KruegerA. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J. Econ. Perspect.20, 3–24. doi: 10.1257/089533006776526030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 253

  KalpidouM.CostinD.MorrisJ. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 183–189. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254

  Kanat-MaymonY.AlmogL.CohenR.Amichai-HamburgerY. (2018). Contingent self-worth and Facebook addiction. Comput. Hum. Behav.88, 227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 255

  KaneG. C.AlaviM.LabiancaG.BorgattiS. P. (2014). What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Q.38, 275–304.

  • Google Scholar

• 256

  KangS.ChungW.MoraA. R.ChungY. (2013). Facebook comparisons among adolescents: how do identification and contrast relate to wellbeing. Asian J. Inf. Commun.5, 1–21.

  • Google Scholar

• 257

  KarakoseT.YirciR.UygunH.OzdemirT. Y. (2016). Relationship between high school students’ Facebook addiction and loneliness status. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.12, 2419–2429. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1557a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258

  KaralH.KokoçM. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ siteleri kullanım amaçlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Turkish J. Comp. Math. Educ.1, 251–263.

  • Google Scholar

• 259

  KellerJ.RoitzheimC.RadtkeT.SchenkelK.SchwarzerR. (2021). A mobile intervention for self-efficacious and goal-directed smartphone use in the general population: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth9:e26397. doi: 10.2196/26397

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260

  KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L.SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.5, 292–314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 261

  KhalilS. A.KamalH.ElkholyH. (2022). The prevalence of problematic Internet use among a sample of Egyptian adolescents and its psychiatric comorbidities. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry68, 294–300. doi: 10.1177/0020764020983841

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 262

  KhattakA. F.AhmadS.MohammadH. (2017). Facebook addiction and depression: a comparative study of gender differences. PUTAJ - Hum. Soc. Sci.25, 55–62.

  • Google Scholar

• 263

  KhazaalY.BillieuxJ.ThorensG.KhanR.LouatiY.ScarlattiE.et al. (2008). French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychol. Behav.11, 703–706. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0249

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 264

  KılıçC. (1996). Genel sağlık anketi: güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Turk Psikiyatri Derg.7, 3–9.

  • Google Scholar

• 265

  KimJ.HaridakisP. M. (2009). The role of Internet user characteristics and motives in explaining three dimensions of Internet addiction. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.14, 988–1015. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01478.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 266

  KimE. S.JamesP.ZevonE. S.Trudel-FitzgeraldC.KubzanskyL. D.GrodsteinF. (2020). Social media as an emerging data resource for epidemiologic research: characteristics of regular and nonregular social media users in nurses’ health study II. Am. J. Epidemiol.189, 156–161. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz224

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 267

  KimY.SohnD.ChoiS. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: a comparative study of American and Korean college students. Comput. Hum. Behav.27, 365–372. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 268

  KirschbaumC.PirkeK.-M.HellhammerD. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’–a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology28, 76–81. doi: 10.1159/000119004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 269

  KitchenhamB.ChartersS. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering version 2.3. Keele University and University of Durham (EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01).

  • Google Scholar

• 270

  KocM.GulyagciS. (2013). Facebook addiction among Turkish college students: the role of psychological health, demographic, and usage characteristics. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.16, 279–284. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0249

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 271

  KohnP. M.KantorL.DeCiccoT. L.BeckA. T. (2008). The Beck Anxiety Inventory–Trait (BAIT): a measure of dispositional anxiety not contaminated by dispositional depression. J. Pers. Assess.90, 499–506. doi: 10.1080/00223890802248844

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 272

  KohoutF. J.BerkmanL. F.EvansD. A.Cornoni-HuntleyJ. (1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. J. Aging Health5, 179–193. doi: 10.1177/089826439300500202

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 273

  KokoszkaA.JastrzębskiA.ObrębskiM. (2016). Ocena psychometrycznych właściwości polskiej wersji Kwestionariusza Zdrowia Pacjenta-9 dla osób dorosłych. Psychiatria13, 187–193.

  • Google Scholar

• 274

  KorolevaK.KrasnovaH.VeltriN. F.GüntherO. (2011). “It’s all about networking! Empirical investigation of social capital formation on social network sites.” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems.

  • Google Scholar

• 275

  KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr. Ann.32, 509–515. doi: 10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 276

  KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med.16, 606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 277

  KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med. Care41, 1284–1292.

  • Google Scholar

• 278

  KrossE.VerduynP.DemiralpE.ParkJ.LeeD. S.LinN.et al. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS One8:e69841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069841

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 279

  KrossE.VerduynP.SheppesG.CostelloC. K.JonidesJ.YbarraO. (2021). Social media and well-being: pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends Cogn. Sci.25, 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 280

  KulkarniR.DeshpandeA. (2019). Relationship between Facebook addiction, depression and shyness among college students in Mumbai. Indian J. Mental Health6, 157–164. doi: 10.30877/IJMH.6.2.2019.157-164

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 281

  KumarB.BanikP.IslamM. A. (2019). Social network, Facebook use and loneliness: a comparative analysis between public and private university students in Bangladesh. Int. J. Psychol. Brain Sci.4:20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20190402.13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 282

  KuncN. (1992). “The need to belong: rediscovering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs” in Restructuring for Caring and Effective Education: An Administrative Guide to Creating Heterogeneous Schools. eds. VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S.StainbackW.StainbackS. (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing), 25–39.

  • Google Scholar

• 283

  KwonM.-W.D’AngeloJ.McLeodD. M. (2013). Facebook use and social capital: to bond, to bridge, or to escape. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc.33, 35–43. doi: 10.1177/0270467613496767

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 284

  La GrecaA. M.LopezN. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: linkages with peer relations and friendships. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.26, 83–94.

  • Google Scholar

• 285

  LabragueL. J. (2014). Facebook use and adolescents’ emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Health Sci. J.8, 80–89.

  • Google Scholar

• 286

  ŁagunaM.Lachowicz-TabaczekK.DzwonkowskaI. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga – polska adaptacja metody. Psychologia Społeczna2, 164–176.

  • Google Scholar

• 287

  LaiB. Z.LaiM. L. (2003). New Lai’s personality scale guide handbook. Taipei: Chian Hua.

  • Google Scholar

• 288

  LampeC.EllisonN.SteinfieldC. (2006). “A Face (book) in the crowd: social searching vs. social browsing.” in Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp. 167–170.

  • Google Scholar

• 289

  LampeC.VitakJ.GrayR.EllisonN. (2012). “Perceptions of Facebook’s value as an information source.” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3195–3204.

  • Google Scholar

• 290

  LawsonJ. S.MarshallW. L.McGrathP. (1979). The Social Self-Esteem Inventory. Educ. Psychol. Meas.39, 803–811. doi: 10.1177/001316447903900413

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 291

  LeM. T. H.TranT. D.HoltonS.NguyenH. T.WolfeR.FisherJ. (2017). Reliability, convergent validity and factor structure of the DASS-21 in a sample of Vietnamese adolescents. PLoS One12:e0180557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180557

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 292

  LearyM. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. J. Pers. Assess.47, 66–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 293

  LedbetterA. M. (2009). Measuring online communication attitude: instrument development and validation. Commun. Monogr.76, 463–486. doi: 10.1080/03637750903300262

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 294

  LeeS. Y. (2014). How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites?: the case of Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav.32, 253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 295

  LeeS. (2020). A study on the effect of comparison with others and social support on life satisfaction of Facebook. Adv. Journal. Commun.8, 1–15. doi: 10.4236/ajc.2020.81001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 296

  LeeR. M.DraperM.LeeS. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: testing a mediator model. J. Couns. Psychol.48, 310–318. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 297

  LeeJ.-E. R.MooreD. C.ParkE.-A.ParkS. G. (2012). Who wants to be “friend-rich”? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness. Comput. Hum. Behav.28, 1036–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 298

  Lee-WonR. J.HerzogL.ParkS. G. (2015). Hooked on Facebook: the role of social anxiety and need for social assurance in problematic use of Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.18, 567–574. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 299

  LemieuxR.LajoieS.TrainorN. E. (2013). Affinity-seeking, social loneliness, and social avoidance among Facebook users. Psychol. Rep.112, 545–552. doi: 10.2466/07.PR0.112.2.545-552

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 300

  LemmensJ. S.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2009). Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychol.12, 77–95. doi: 10.1080/15213260802669458

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 301

  LiX.ChenW.PopielP. (2015). What happens on Facebook stays on Facebook? The implications of Facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support. Comput. Hum. Behav.51, 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 302

  LiebowitzM. R. (1987). “Social phobia” in Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry (Vol. 22). ed. KleinD. F. (Basel: Karger), 141–173.

  • Google Scholar

• 303

  LimM.YangY. (2019). Upward social comparison and Facebook users’ grandiosity: examining the effect of envy on loneliness and subjective well-being. Online Inf. Rev.43, 635–652. doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2017-0137

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 304

  LocatelliS. M.KluweK.BryantF. B. (2012). Facebook use and the tendency to ruminate among college students: testing mediational hypotheses. J. Educ. Comput. Res.46, 377–394. doi: 10.2190/EC.46.4.d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 305

  Longua PetersonJ.GiguereB.ShermanJ. (2017). Social connection and social networking: daily conflict increases nightly Facebook use among avoidant participants. Self Identity16, 215–230. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1247011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 306

  LönnqvistJ.-E.große DetersF. (2016). Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav.55, 113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 307

  LoosP.RiedlR.Müller-PutzG. R.vom BrockeJ.DavisF. D.BankerR. D.et al. (2010). NeuroIS: neuroscientific approaches in the investigation and development of information systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng.2, 395–401. doi: 10.1007/s12599-010-0130-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 308

  LouL. L.YanZ.NickersonA.McMorrisR. (2012). An examination of the reciprocal relationship of loneliness and Facebook use among first-year college students. J. Educ. Comput. Res.46, 105–117. doi: 10.2190/EC.46.1.e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 309

  LouragliI.AhamiA.KhadmaouiA.AboussalehY.Chaker LamraniA. (2019). Behavioral analysis of adolescent’s students addicted to Facebook and its impact on performance and mental health. Acta Neuropsychol.17, 427–439. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.6550

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 310

  LovibondP. F.LovibondS. H. (1995a). The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav. Res. Ther.33, 335–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 311

  LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995b). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia.

  • Google Scholar

• 312

  LuqmanA.CaoX.AliA.MasoodA.YuL. (2017). Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Comput. Hum. Behav.70, 544–555. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 313

  LyubomirskyS.LepperH. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc. Indic. Res.46, 137–155.

  • Google Scholar

• 314

  MabeA. G.ForneyK. J.KeelP. K. (2014). Do you “like” my photo? Facebook use maintains eating disorder risk. Int. J. Eat. Disord.47, 516–523. doi: 10.1002/eat.22254

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 315

  MaglunogG. P.DyM. F. R. (2019). Facebook usage and depressıon levels of selected Filipino college students. Int. J. Psychol. Educ. Stud.6, 35–50. doi: 10.17220/ijpes.2019.02.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 316

  MaierC.LaumerS.EckhardtA.WeitzelT. (2015). Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites. Eur. J. Inf. Syst.24, 447–464. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 317

  MakowskaZ.MereczD. (2001). “Polska adaptacja kwestionariuszy Ogólnego Stanu Zdrowia Davida Goldberga: GHQ-12 i GHQ-28” in Ocena zdrowia psychicznego na podstawie badań kwestionariuszami Davida Goldberga: Podręcznik dla użytkowników kwestionariuszy GHQ-12 i GHQ-28. eds. GoldbergD.WilliamsP. (Łódź: Instytut Medycyny Pracy), 191–264.

  • Google Scholar

• 318

  MalikS.KhanM. (2015). Impact of Facebook addiction on narcissistic behavior and self-esteem among student. J. Pak. Med. Assoc.65, 260–263.

  • Google Scholar

• 319

  ManagoA. M.TaylorT.GreenfieldP. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Dev. Psychol.48, 369–380. doi: 10.1037/a0026338

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 320

  MannM.HosmanC. M. H.SchaalmaH. P.de VriesN. K. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Educ. Res.19, 357–372. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 321

  ManninoG.SalernoL.BonfantiR. C.AlbanoG.Lo CocoG. (2021). The impact of Facebook use on self-reported eating disorders during the COVID-19 lockdown. BMC Psychiatry21:611. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03628-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 322

  MarcoenA.GoossensL.CaesP. (1987). Lonelines in pre-through late adolescence: exploring the contributions of a multidimensional approach. J. Youth Adolesc.16, 561–577. doi: 10.1007/BF02138821

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 323

  MarderB.JoinsonA.ShankarA.ThirlawayK. (2016). Strength matters: self-presentation to the strongest audience rather than lowest common denominator when faced with multiple audiences in social network sites. Comput. Hum. Behav.61, 56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 324

  MarengoD.MontagC. (2020). Digital phenotyping of Big Five personality via Facebook data mining: a meta-analysis. Digital Psychol.1, 52–64. doi: 10.24989/dp.v1i1.1823

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 325

  MarengoD.MontagC.SindermannC.ElhaiJ. D.SettanniM. (2021). Examining the links between active Facebook use, received likes, self-esteem and happiness: a study using objective social media data. Telematics Inform.58:101523. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101523

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 326

  MarengoD.SindermannC.ElhaiJ. D.MontagC. (2020). One social media company to rule them all: associations between use of Facebook-owned social media platforms, sociodemographic characteristics, and the Big Five personality traits. Front. Psychol.11:936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00936

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 327

  MarkowetzA. (2015). Digitaler Burnout: warum unsere permanente Smartphone-Nutzung gefährlich ist. München: Droemer Knaur.

  • Google Scholar

• 328

  MarteauT. M.BekkerH. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br. J. Clin. Psychol.31, 301–306. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 329

  Martín-AlboJ.NúñezJ. L.NavarroJ. G.GrijalvoF. (2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students. Span. J. Psychol.10, 458–467. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006727

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 330

  MasciantonioA.BourguignonD.BouchatP.BaltyM.RiméB. (2021). Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One16:e0248384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248384

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 331

  MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev.50, 370–396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 332

  MaslowA. H. (1981). Motivation and personality. New Dehli: Prabhat Prakashan.

  • Google Scholar

• 333

  MattickR. P.ClarkeJ. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav. Res. Ther.36, 455–470. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 334

  MauriM.CipressoP.BalgeraA.VillamiraM.RivaG. (2011). Why is Facebook so successful? Psychophysiological measures describe a core flow state while using Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 723–731. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0377

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 335

  Mazman AkarS. G. (2009). Adoption process of social networks and their usage in educational context. Unpublished Master Thesis. Hacettepe University.

  • Google Scholar

• 336

  McCloskeyW.IwanickiS.LauterbachD.GiammittorioD. M.MaxwellK. (2015). Are Facebook “friends” helpful? Development of a Facebook-based measure of social support and examination of relationships among depression, quality of life, and social support. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.18, 499–505. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0538

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 337

  McCordB.RodebaughT. L.LevinsonC. A. (2014). Facebook: social uses and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav.34, 23–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 338

  MeerkerkG.-J.Van Den EijndenR. J. J. M.VermulstA. A.GarretsenH. F. L. (2009). The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychol. Behav.12, 1–6. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0181

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 339

  MehdizadehS. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.13, 357–364. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 340

  MetzlerA.ScheithauerH. (2017). The long-term benefits of positive self-presentation via profile pictures, number of friends and the initiation of relationships on Facebook for adolescents’ self-esteem and the initiation of offline relationships. Front. Psychol.8:1981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01981

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 341

  MichikyanM.DennisJ.SubrahmanyamK. (2015). Can you guess who I am? Real, ideal, and false self-presentation on Facebook among emerging adults. Emerg. Adulthood3, 55–64. doi: 10.1177/2167696814532442

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 342

  MillonT.MillonC.DavisR.GrossmanS. (2009). MCMI-III Manual (4th Ed). Minneapolis: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Google Scholar

• 343

  MimuraC.GriffithsP. (2007). A Japanese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and equivalence assessment. J. Psychosom. Res.62, 589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 344

  MirbabaieM.StieglitzS.MarxJ. (2022). Digital detox. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng.64, 239–246. doi: 10.1007/s12599-022-00747-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 345

  MonacisL.de PaloV.GriffithsM. D.SinatraM. (2017). Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J. Behav. Addict.6, 178–186. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 346

  MontagC.BeyK.ShaP.LiM.ChenY.-F.LiuW.-Y.et al. (2015). Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China. Asia Pac. Psychiatry7, 20–26. doi: 10.1111/appy.12122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 347

  MontagC.ElhaiJ. D.DagumP. (2021a). On blurry boundaries when defining digital biomarkers: how much biology needs to be in a digital biomarker?Front. Psychol.12:740292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.740292

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 348

  MontagC.ElhaiJ. D.DagumP. (2021b). Show me your smartphone… and then I will show you your brain structure and brain function. Hum. Behav. Emerging Technol.3, 891–897. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 349

  MontagC.HegelichS. (2020). Understanding detrimental aspects of social media use: will the real culprits please stand up?Front. Sociol.5:599270. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.599270

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 350

  MontagC.HegelichS.SindermannC.RozgonjukD.MarengoD.ElhaiJ. D. (2021c). On corporate responsibility when studying social media use and well-being. Trends Cogn. Sci.25, 268–270. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 351

  MontagC.LachmannB.HerrlichM.ZweigK. (2019). Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health16:2612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142612

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 352

  MontagC.MarkowetzA.BlaszkiewiczK.AndoneI.LachmannB.SariyskaR.et al. (2017). Facebook usage on smartphones and gray matter volume of the nucleus accumbens. Behav. Brain Res.329, 221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 353

  MontagC.QuintanaD. S. (2023). Digital phenotyping in molecular psychiatry—a missed opportunity?Mol. Psychiatry. 28, 6–9. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01795-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 354

  MontagC.SindermannC.BaumeisterH. (2020a). Digital phenotyping in psychological and medical sciences: a reflection about necessary prerequisites to reduce harm and increase benefits. Curr. Opin. Psychol.36, 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 355

  MontagC.SindermannC.LesterD.DavisK. L. (2020b). Linking individual differences in satisfaction with each of Maslow’s needs to the Big Five personality traits and Panksepp’s primary emotional systems. Heliyon6:e04325. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04325

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 356

  MontagC.YangH.ElhaiJ. D. (2021d). On the psychology of TikTok use: a first glimpse from empirical findings. Front. Public Health9:641673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 357

  Morahan-MartinJ.SchumacherP. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Comput. Hum. Behav.16, 13–29. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 358

  MorenoM. A.StewartM.PumperM.CoxE.YoungH.ZhangC.et al. (2014). Facebook use during a stressful event: a pilot evaluation investigating Facebook use patterns and biologic stress response. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc.34, 94–98. doi: 10.1177/0270467614561674

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 359

  Morin-MajorJ. K.MarinM.-F.DurandN.WanN.JusterR.-P.LupienS. J. (2016). Facebook behaviors associated with diurnal cortisol in adolescents: is befriending stressful?Psychoneuroendocrinology63, 238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 360

  MoroiK. (1989). Loneliness and coping strategies in university students. Jap. J. Educ. Soc. Psychol.29, 141–151.

  • Google Scholar

• 361

  MoussaM. T.LovibondP. F.LaubeR.MegaheadH. A. (2017). Psychometric properties of an arabic version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). Res. Soc. Work. Pract.27, 375–386. doi: 10.1177/1049731516662916

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 362

  MushtaqR.ShoibS.ShahT.MushtaqS. (2014). Relationship between loneliness, psychiatric disorders and physical health? A review on the psychological aspects of loneliness. J. Clin. Diagn. Res.8, WE01–WE04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10077.4828

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 363

  NabiR. L.PrestinA.SoJ. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.16, 721–727. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 364

  NasrH. E.Ben RachedK. S. (2021). The psychological and behavioural antecedents of Facebook addiction. Acad. Entrepren. J.27, 1–14.

  • Google Scholar

• 365

  NasserN. S.LingL. J.RashidA. A.SharifatH.HamidS. A.RahimE. A.et al. (2019). Assessment of problematic Facebook use among undergraduate students in UPM correlated with depression, anxiety and stress. Int. J. Public Health Clin. Sci.6, 113–132. doi: 10.32827/ijphcs.6.4.113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 366

  NazzalZ.RabeeH.Ba’arM.BerteD. (2021). Virtually alone: excessive Facebook use and mental health risk in Palestine, a cross sectional study. Palestinian Med. Pharm. J.6, 53–62.

  • Google Scholar

• 367

  NetaM.NorrisC. J.WhalenP. J. (2009). Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion9, 640–648. doi: 10.1037/a0016819

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 368

  NgF.TrauerT.DoddS.CallalyT.CampbellS.BerkM. (2007). The validity of the 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsych.19, 304–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00217.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 369

  NickE. A.ColeD. A.ChoS.-J.SmithD. K.CarterT. G.ZelkowitzR. L. (2018). The Online Social Support Scale: measure development and validation. Psychol. Assess.30, 1127–1143. doi: 10.1037/pas0000558

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 370

  NilchaikovitT.SukyingC.SilpakitC. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the General Health Questionnaire. J. Psychiatric Assoc. Thailand41, 2–17.

  • Google Scholar

• 371

  NilgesP.EssauC. (2015). Die Depressions-Angst-Stress-Skalen. Der Schmerz29, 649–657. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 372

  NisarT. M.PrabhakarG.IlavarasanP. V.BaabdullahA. M. (2019). Facebook usage and mental health: an empirical study of role of non-directional social comparisons in the UK. Int. J. Inf. Manag.48, 53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 373

  NizamiG. N.NaeemZ.ArzooK.IsmailS. (2017). Impact of Facebook addiction on academic performance among undergraduate students. Pakistan J. Rehabil.6, 45–50.

  • Google Scholar

• 374

  NormanP.ElavarasanK.DhandapaniT. (2017). Facebook addiction and depression in adults [19 years-64 years]. Int. J. Commun. Med. Public Health4, 2999–3004. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20173361

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 375

  NylandR.MarvezR.BeckJ. (2007). “MySpace: social networking or social isolation?” in Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

  • Google Scholar

• 376

  O’BrienK. S.CaputiP.MintoR.PeoplesG.HooperC.KellS.et al. (2009). Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body Image6, 201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.03.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 377

  O’SullivanA.HussainZ. (2017). An exploratory study of Facebook intensity and its links to narcissism, stress, and self-esteem. J. Addict. Behav. Ther. Rehabil.6:1. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000161

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 378

  Ögel-BalabanH.AltanŞ. (2020). The use of Facebook by Turkish mothers: its reasons and outcomes. J. Child Fam. Stud.29, 780–790. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01568-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 379

  OhannessianC. M. (2009). Media use and adolescent psychological adjustment: an examination of gender differences. J. Child Fam. Stud.18, 582–593. doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9261-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 380

  OlssonG.von KnottingA.-L. (1997). Depression among Swedish adolescents measured by the self rating scale Center for Epidemiology Studies - Depression Child (CES-DC). Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry6, 81–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00566670

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 381

  OmarB.SubramanianK. (2013). Addicted to Facebook: examining the roles of personality characteristics, gratifications sought and Facebook exposure among youths. GSTF J. Media Commun.1, 54–65. doi: 10.5176/2335-6618_1.1.6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 382

  OmolayoB. O.BalogunS. K.OmoleO. C. (2013). Influence of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Eur. Sci. J.9, 148–159.

  • Google Scholar

• 383

  ÖnerN.Le CompteA. (1983). Durumluk—Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri el kitabı. Istanbul: Bogazici University.

  • Google Scholar

• 384

  OroszG.Tóth-KirályI.BőtheB. (2016). Four facets of Facebook intensity — the development of the Multidimensional Facebook Intensity Scale. Personal. Individ. Differ.100, 95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 385

  OzimekP.BierhoffH.-W. (2016). Facebook use depending on age: the influence of social comparisons. Comput. Hum. Behav.61, 271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 386

  OzimekP.BierhoffH.-W. (2020). All my online-friends are better than me – three studies about ability-based comparative social media use, self-esteem, and depressive tendencies. Behav. Inform. Technol.39, 1110–1123. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1642385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 387

  OzimekP.BierhoffH.-W.RohmannE. (2021). How downward and upward comparisons on Facebook influence grandiose and vulnerable narcissists’ self-esteem—a priming study. Behav. Sci.11:39. doi: 10.3390/bs11030039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 388

  PalA.ShankarS. H.MasthiN. R. R. (2018). Correlation of personality and mental well-being with Facebook use: does gender play a role?RGUHS Nat. J. Public Health3, 26–34.

  • Google Scholar

• 389

  PapacharissiZ.RubinA. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media44, 175–196. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 390

  ParéG.TrudelM.-C.JaanaM.KitsiouS. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf. Manag.52, 183–199. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 391

  ParkS. Y.BaekY. M. (2018). Two faces of social comparison on Facebook: the interplay between social comparison orientation, emotions, and psychological well-being. Comput. Hum. Behav.79, 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 392

  ParkS.LeeS. W.KwakJ.ChaM.JeongB. (2013). Activities on Facebook reveal the depressive state of users. J. Med. Internet Res.15:e217. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2718

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 393

  ParryD. A.DavidsonB. I.SewallC. J. R.FisherJ. T.MieczkowskiH.QuintanaD. S. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nat. Hum. Behav.5, 1535–1547. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 394

  PavotW.DienerE. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res.28, 1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01086714

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 395

  PetersL.SunderlandM.AndrewsG.RapeeR. M.MattickR. P. (2012). Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: the SIAS-6 and the SPS-6. Psychol. Assess.24, 66–76. doi: 10.1037/a0024544

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 396

  PetersonD.SeligmanM. E. (1984). Content analysis of verbatim explanations: The CAVE technique for assessing explanatory style. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

  • Google Scholar

• 397

  PhanasathitM.ManwongM.HanprathetN.KhumsriJ.YingyeunR. (2015). Validation of the Thai version of Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (Thai-BFAS). J. Med. Assoc. Thail.98, 108–117.

  • Google Scholar

• 398

  PhuB.GowA. J. (2019). Facebook use and its association with subjective happiness and loneliness. Comput. Hum. Behav.92, 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 399

  PichotP.BoyerP.PullC. B.ReinW.SimonM.ThibaultA. (1984). Un questionnaire d’auto-évaluation de la symptomatologie dépressive, le Questionnaire QD2: I. Construction, structure factorielle et propriétés métrologiques. Rev. Psychol. Appl.34, 229–250.

  • Google Scholar

• 400

  PrezzaM.TrombacciaF. R.ArmentoL. (1997). La scala dell’autostima di Rosenberg: traduzione e validazione italiana. Bollettino Di Psicologia Appli.223, 35–44.

  • Google Scholar

• 401

  PrimiC.FioravantiG.CasaleS.DonatiM. A. (2021). Measuring problematic Facebook use among adolescents and young adults with the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale: a psychometric analysis by applying item response theory. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18:2979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062979

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 402

  PrzepiórkaA.BłachnioA. (2020). The role of Facebook intrusion, depression, and future time perspective in sleep problems among adolescents. J. Res. Adolesc.30, 559–569. doi: 10.1111/jora.12543

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 403

  PrzepiórkaA.BłachnioA.SullmanM.GorbaniukO.SiuN. Y.-F.HillT.et al. (2021). Facebook intrusion as a mediator between positive capital and general distress: a cross-cultural study. Front. Psychol.12:667536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.667536

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 404

  PuccioF.KalathasF.Fuller-TyszkiewiczM.KrugI. (2016). A revised examination of the dual pathway model for bulimic symptoms: the importance of social comparisons made on Facebook and sociotropy. Comput. Hum. Behav.65, 142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 405

  RaackeJ.Bonds-RaackeJ. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychol. Behav.11, 169–174. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 406

  RabungS.HarfstT.KawskiS.KochU.WittchenH.-U.SchulzH. (2009). Psychometrische Überprüfung einer verkürzten Version der »Hamburger Module zur Erfassung allgemeiner Aspekte psychosozialer Gesundheit für die therapeutische Praxis« (HEALTH-49). Z. Psychosom. Med. Psychother.55, 162–179. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2009.55.2.162

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 407

  RachubińskaK.CybulskaA. M.GrochansE. (2021). The relationship between loneliness, depression, Internet and social media addiction among young polish women. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.25, 1982–1989. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202102_25099

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 408

  RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas.1, 385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 409

  RadloffL. S. (1991). The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. J. Youth Adolesc.20, 149–166. doi: 10.1007/BF01537606

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 410

  RaeJ. R.LonborgS. D. (2015). Do motivations for using Facebook moderate the association between Facebook use and psychological well-being?Front. Psychol.6:771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00771

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 411

  RahmanM. M.ZakariaM. (2021). Facebook use and its relationship with physical and mental health among university students in Bangladesh. Commun. Media Asia Pacific4, 33–44. doi: 10.14456/cmap.2021.9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 412

  RajeshT.RangaiahB. (2020). Facebook addiction and personality. Heliyon6:e03184. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03184

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 413

  RauchS. M.StrobelC.BellaM.OdachowskiZ.BloomC. (2014). Face to face versus Facebook: does exposure to social networking web sites augment or attenuate physiological arousal among the socially anxious?Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.17, 187–190. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0498

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 414

  RecchiutiJ. K. (2003). College students’ uses and motives for e-mail, instant messaging and online chat. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Delaware.

  • Google Scholar

• 415

  ReerF.TangW. Y.QuandtT. (2019). Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: the mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Media Soc.21, 1486–1505. doi: 10.1177/1461444818823719

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 416

  RidingsC. M.GefenD. (2004). Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.10:JCMC10110. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 417

  RiedlR.BankerR. D.BenbasatI.DavisF. D.DennisA. R.DimokaA.et al. (2010). On the foundations of NeuroIS: reflections on the Gmunden Retreat 2009. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.27, 243–264. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02715

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 418

  RiedlR.DavisF. D.BankerR. D.KenningP. H. (2017). Neuroscience in information systems research: applying knowledge of brain functionality without neuroscience tools. Cham: Springer.

  • Google Scholar

• 419

  RiedlR.DavisF. D.HevnerA. R. (2014). Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.15, I–XXXV. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00377

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 420

  RiedlR.FischerT.LégerP.-M.DavisF. D. (2020). A decade of NeuroIS research: progress, challenges, and future directions. ACM SIGMIS Database51, 13–54. doi: 10.1145/3410977.3410980

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 421

  RiedlR.LégerP.-M. (2016). Fundamentals of NeuroIS: information systems and the brain. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Google Scholar

• 422

  RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.27, 151–161. doi: 10.1177/0146167201272002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 423

  RosenL. D.WhalingK.CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A.RokkumJ. (2013a). The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: an empirical investigation. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 2501–2511. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 424

  RosenL. D.WhalingK.RabS.CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A. (2013b). Is Is Facebook creating “iDisorders”? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 1243–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 425

  RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 426

  RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

  • Google Scholar

• 427

  RosenbergM. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Revised Ed). Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 428

  RosenbergM.SchoolerC.SchoenbachC.RosenbergF. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Am. Sociol. Rev.60, 141–156. doi: 10.2307/2096350

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 429

  RosenthalS. R.BukaS. L.MarshallB. D. L.CareyK. B.ClarkM. A. (2016). Negative experiences on Facebook and depressive symptoms among young adults. J. Adolesc. Health59, 510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 430

  Rosenthal-von der PüttenA. M.HastallM. R.KöcherS.MeskeC.HeinrichT.LabrenzF.et al. (2019). “Likes” as social rewards: their role in online social comparison and decisions to like other People’s selfies. Comput. Hum. Behav.92, 76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 431

  RossC.OrrE. S.SisicM.ArseneaultJ. M.SimmeringM. G.OrrR. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav.25, 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 432

  RouisS.LimayemM.Salehi-SangariE. (2011). Impact of Facebook usage on students academic achievement: role of self-regulation and trust. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol.9, 961–994.

  • Google Scholar

• 433

  RozgonjukD.DavisK. L.MontagC. (2021a). The roles of primary emotional systems and need satisfaction in problematic Internet and smartphone use: a network perspective. Front. Psychol.12:709805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709805

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 434

  RozgonjukD.SindermannC.ElhaiJ. D.MontagC. (2021b). Comparing smartphone, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat: which platform elicits the greatest use disorder symptoms?Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.24, 129–134. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0156

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 435

  RubinA. M. (2002). “The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects” in Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. eds. BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 525–548.

  • Google Scholar

• 436

  RudolphA.Schröder-AbéM.SchützA. (2009). Development and validation of a German-language version of the State Self-Esteem Scale. Manuscript in Preparation.

  • Google Scholar

• 437

  RusH. M.TiemensmaJ. (2017). Social media under the skin: Facebook use after acute stress impairs cortisol recovery. Front. Psychol.8:1609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01609

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 438

  RusH. M.TiemensmaJ. (2018). Social media as a shield: Facebook buffers acute stress. Physiol. Behav.185, 46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 439

  RussellD. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. Pers. Assess.66, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 440

  RussellD. W.CutronaC. E. (1988). Development and evolution of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Iowa.

  • Google Scholar

• 441

  RussellD. W.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.39, 472–480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 442

  RussellD. W.PeplauL. A.FergusonM. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. J. Pers. Assess.42, 290–294. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 443

  RyanT.XenosS. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Comput. Hum. Behav.27, 1658–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 444

  Saint-LaurentL. (1999). Adaptation française du Children’s Depression Inventory de Maria Kovacs. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Google Scholar

• 445

  SaleemM.IrshadR.ZafarM.TahiM. A. (2016). Facebook addiction causing loneliness among higher learning students of Pakistan: a linear relationship. Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences5, 26–31.

  • Google Scholar

• 446

  SalemA. A. M. S.AlmenayeN. S.AndreassenC. S. (2016). A psychometric evaluation of Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) of university students. Int. J. Psychol. Behav. Sci.6, 199–205.

  • Google Scholar

• 447

  SalgadoS.KaplittM. G. (2015). The nucleus accumbens: a comprehensive review. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.93, 75–93. doi: 10.1159/000368279

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 448

  SariyskaR.LachmannB.ChengC.GnisciA.SergiI.PaceA.et al. (2019). The motivation for Facebook use – is it a matter of bonding or control over others?J. Individ. Differ.40, 26–35. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000273

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 449

  SaticiS. A. (2019). Facebook addiction and subjective well-being: a study of the mediating role of shyness and loneliness. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict.17, 41–55. doi: 10.1007/s11469-017-9862-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 450

  SaticiS. A.UysalR. (2015). Well-being and problematic Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav.49, 185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 451

  SchaeferL. M.ThompsonJ. K. (2014). The development and validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised (PACS-R). Eat. Behav.15, 209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.01.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 452

  ScherrS.BrunetA. (2017). Differential influences of depression and personality traits on the use of Facebook. Social Media + Society3, 1–14. doi: 10.1177/2056305117698495

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 453

  ScherrS.TomaC. L.SchusterB. (2019). Depression as a predictor of Facebook surveillance and envy: longitudinal evidence from a cross-lagged panel study in Germany. J. Media Psychol.31, 196–202. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000247

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 454

  SchmittM.HübnerA.MaesJ. (2010). Validierung des Vereinfachten Beck-Depressions-Inventars (BDI-V) an Fremdeinschätzungen. Diagnostica56, 125–132. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 455

  SchmuckD.KarsayK.MatthesJ.StevicA. (2019). “Looking Up and Feeling Down”. The influence of mobile social networking site use on upward social comparison, self-esteem, and well-being of adult smartphone users. Telematics Inform.42:101240. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101240

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 456

  ScholtenS.LavalleeK.VeltenJ.ZhangX. C.MargrafJ. (2014). The brief daily stressor screening: An introduction and evaluation. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Google Scholar

• 457

  SchreinerM.FischerT.RiedlR. (2021). Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: literature review and research agenda. Electron. Commer. Res.21, 329–345. doi: 10.1007/s10660-019-09353-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 458

  SchryenG.BenlianA.RoweF.GregorS.LarsenK.PetterS.et al. (2017). Literature reviews in IS research: what can be learnt from the past and other fields?Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.41, 759–774. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.04130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 459

  SchryenG.WagnerG.BenlianA.ParéG. (2020). A knowledge development perspective on literature reviews: validation of a new typology in the IS field. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.46, 134–186. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.04607

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 460

  SchumacherJ. (2003). “Satisfaction With Life Scale” in Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden (Band 2 von Diagnostik für Klinik und Praxis). eds. SchumacherJ.KlaibergA.BrählerE. (Göttingen: Hogrefe), 305–309.

  • Google Scholar

• 461

  SeharH.RazaqN.KanwalS.JogezaiA. K.AshrafM. T.TehzeebM. (2022). Relationship of personality traits and self-esteem with Facebook addiction among university students. Rawal Med. J.47, 227–230.

  • Google Scholar

• 462

  SeniorC.RussellT.GazzanigaM. S. (2009). Methods in mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 463

  SeranJ. A.LerikM. D. C.WijayaR. P. C.AduA. A. (2020). The relationship between self esteem and Facebook addiction in adolescents in Kupang City. Journal of Health and Behavioral Science2, 252–263.

  • Google Scholar

• 464

  ShaP.SariyskaR.RiedlR.LachmannB.MontagC. (2019). Linking Internet communication and smartphone use disorder by taking a closer look at the Facebook and WhatsApp applications. Addict. Behav. Rep.9:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 465

  ShakyaH. B.ChristakisN. A. (2017). Association of Facebook use with compromised well-being: a longitudinal study. Am. J. Epidemiol.185, 203–211. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww189

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 466

  ShawA. M.TimpanoK. R.TranT. B.JoormannJ. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: the relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Comput. Hum. Behav.48, 575–580. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 467

  SheehanD. V.SheehanK. H.ShytleR. D.JanavsJ.BannonY.RogersJ. E.et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of the mini international neuropsychiatric interview for children and adolescents (MINI-KID). J. Clin. Psychiatry71, 313–326.

  • Google Scholar

• 468

  SherbourneC. D.StewartA. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Soc. Sci. Med.32, 705–714. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 469

  ShettarM.KarkalR.KakunjeA.MendonsaR. D.ChandranV. M. (2017). Facebook addiction and loneliness in the post-graduate students of a university in southern India. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry63, 325–329. doi: 10.1177/0020764017705895

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 470

  SillenceE.SaxtonT. K.PolletT. V. (2021). Facebook social use and anxiety: a replication attempt. Hum. Commun. Technol.2, 19–36.

  • Google Scholar

• 471

  SimonA. (2020). Ist Facebook schlecht für die psychische Gesundheit?Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol.70:98. doi: 10.1055/a-1102-8376

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 472

  SimoncicT. E.KuhlmanK. R.VargasI.HouchinsS.Lopez-DuranN. L. (2014). Facebook use and depressive symptomatology: investigating the role of neuroticism and extraversion in youth. Comput. Hum. Behav.40, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 473

  SindermannC.DukeÉ.MontagC. (2020). Personality associations with Facebook use and tendencies towards Facebook use disorder. Addict. Behav. Rep.11:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100264

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 474

  SindermannC.MontagC.ElhaiJ. D. (2022). The design of social media platforms—initial evidence on relations between personality, fear of missing out, design element-driven increased social media use, and problematic social media use. Technol. Mind Behav.3. doi: 10.1037/tmb0000096

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 475

  SkuesJ. L.WilliamsB.WiseL. (2012). The effects of personality traits, self-esteem, loneliness, and narcissism on Facebook use among university students. Comput. Hum. Behav.28, 2414–2419. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 476

  SmithA. R.HamesJ. L.JoinerT. E.Jr. (2013). Status update: maladaptive Facebook usage predicts increases in body dissatisfaction and bulimic symptoms. J. Affect. Disord.149, 235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 477

  SmithT.ShortA. (2022). Needs affordance as a key factor in likelihood of problematic social media use: validation, latent profile analysis and comparison of TikTok and Facebook problematic use measures. Addict. Behav.129:107259. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107259

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 478

  SoraciP.FerrariA.BarberisN.LuvaràG.UrsoA.Del FanteE.et al. (2020). Psychometric analysis and validation of the Italian Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00346-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 479

  SoteroL.da VeigaG. F.CarreiraD.PortugalA.RelvasA. P. (2019). Facebook addiction and emerging adults: the influence of sociodemographic variables, family communication, and differentiation of self. Escritos de Psicol.12, 81–92. doi: 10.24310/espsiescpsi.v12i2.9986

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 480

  SpielbergerC. D. (1989). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: bibliography (2nd Ed). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 481

  SpielbergerC. D.RitterbandL. M.ReheiserE. C.BrunnerT. M. (2003). The nature and measurement of depression. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.3, 209–234.

  • Google Scholar

• 482

  SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B. W.LöweB. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med.166:1092. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 483

  SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B. W.Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA282, 1737–1744. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 484

  SrivastavaA. (2015). The effect of Facebook use on life satisfaction and subjective happiness of college students. Int. J. Indian Psychol.2. doi: 10.25215/0204.078

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 485

  StănculescuE.GriffithsM. D. (2021). Anxious attachment and Facebook addiction: the mediating role of need to belong, self-esteem, and Facebook use to meet romantic partners. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict.21, 333–349. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00598-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 486

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2022a). “Measurement of heart rate and heart rate variability: a review of NeuroIS research with a focus on applied methods” in Information Systems and Neuroscience: NeuroIS Retreat 2022 (LNISO, Vol. 58). eds. DavisF. D.RiedlR.vom BrockeJ.LégerP.-M.RandolphA. B.Müller-PutzG. R. (Cham: Springer), 269–283.

  • Google Scholar

• 487

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2022b). “Measurement of heart rate and heart rate variability in NeuroIS research: review of empirical results” in Information Systems and Neuroscience: NeuroIS Retreat 2022 (LNISO, Vol. 58). eds. DavisF. D.RiedlR.vom BrockeJ.LégerP.-M.RandolphA. B.Müller-PutzG. R., (Cham: Springer), 285–299.

  • Google Scholar

• 488

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2022c). “Measurement of heart rate and heart rate variability with wearable devices: a systematic review.” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik.

  • Google Scholar

• 489

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023a). Digital Detoxing als Maßnahme gegen digitalen Stress: Auf die Verwendung digitaler Technologien temporär verzichten. Theologisch-praktische Quartalschrift, 171, 274–283.

  • Google Scholar

• 490

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023b). Interruption science as a research field: towards a taxonomy of interruptions as a foundation for the field. Front. Psychol.14:1043426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043426

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 491

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023c). “Interruptions in the workplace: an exploratory study among digital business professionals” in HCI in Business, Government and Organizations: 10th International Conference, HCIBGO 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, Proceedings, Part II (LNCS, Vol. 14039). eds. F. F.-H. Nah and K. Siau (Cham: Springer), 400–422. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36049-7_29

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 492

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023d). “Neurophysiological measurements in the research field of digital detoxing: review and implications for future research” in Information Systems and Neuroscience: NeuroIS Retreat 2023 (LNISO). eds. DavisF. D.RiedlR.vom BrockeJ.LégerP.-M.RandolphA. B.Müller-PutzG. R. (Cham: Springer), in press.

  • Google Scholar

• 493

  StanglF. J.RiedlR. (2023e). “Neurophysiological measurements in the research field of interruption science: insights into applied methods for different interruption types based on an umbrella review” in Information Systems and Neuroscience: NeuroIS Retreat 2023 (LNISO). eds. DavisF. D.RiedlR.vom BrockeJ.LégerP.-M.RandolphA. B.Müller-PutzG. R. (Cham: Springer), in press.

  • Google Scholar

• 494

  Statista (2022a). Average daily time spent on selected social networks by adults in the United States from 2017 to 2022, by platform (in minutes). Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/324267/us-adults-daily-facebook-minutes/ [Accessed November 28, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 495

  Statista (2022b). Distribution of Facebook users worldwide as of January 2022, by age and gender. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/376128/facebook-global-user-age-distribution/ [Accessed December 19, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 496

  Statista (2022c). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of April 2022, by age and gender. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/ [Accessed December 19, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 497

  Statista (2022d). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2022 (in millions). Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/ [Accessed November 28, 2022].

  • Google Scholar

• 498

  SteersM.-L. N.WickhamR. E.AcitelliL. K. (2014). Seeing everyone else’s highlight reels: how Facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.33, 701–731. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.701

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 499

  StegginkB. W. (2015). Facebook addiction: where does it come from? A study based on the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Twente.

  • Google Scholar

• 500

  SternbergN.LuriaR.ChandhokS.VickersB.KrossE.SheppesG. (2020). When Facebook and finals collide - procrastinatory social media usage predicts enhanced anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav.109:106358. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106358

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 501

  SternbergN.LuriaR.SheppesG. (2018). For whom is social-network usage associated with anxiety? The moderating role of neural working-memory filtering of Facebook information. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.18, 1145–1158. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0627-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 502

  StiegerS. (2019). Facebook usage and life satisfaction. Front. Psychol.10:2711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02711

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 503

  StraubD. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Q.13, 147–169. doi: 10.2307/248922

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 504

  SwamiV.StiegerS.VoracekM.DresslerS. G.EismaL.FurnhamA. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Tagalog and German Subjective Happiness Scales and a cross-cultural comparison. Soc. Indic. Res.93, 393–406. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9331-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 505

  TamsS.AhujaM.ThatcherJ. B.GroverV. (2020). Worker stress in the age of mobile technology: the combined effects of perceived interruption overload and worker control. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.29:101595. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 506

  TandocE. C.Jr.FerrucciP.DuffyM. (2015). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: is facebooking depressing?Comput. Hum. Behav.43, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 507

  TandocE. C.Jr.GohZ. H. (2023). Is facebooking really depressing? Revisiting the relationships among social media use, envy, and depression. Inf. Commun. Soc.26, 551–567. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1954975

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 508

  TartagliaS. (2016). Different modalities of using Facebook: the influence of actual social relations, wellbeing, and attitude towards the medium. Stud. Psychol.58, 3–17. doi: 10.21909/sp.2016.01.703

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 509

  TaylorD. G.StruttonD. (2016). Does Facebook usage lead to conspicuous consumption? The role of envy, narcissism and self-promotion. J. Res. Interact. Mark.10, 231–248. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-01-2015-0009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 510

  TazghiniS.SiedleckiK. L. (2013). A mixed method approach to examining Facebook use and its relationship to self-esteem. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 827–832. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 511

  TeoA. R.ChanB. K.SahaS.NicolaidisC. (2019). Frequency of social contact in-person vs. on Facebook: an examination of associations with psychiatric symptoms in military veterans. J. Affect. Disord.243, 375–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 512

  TeppersE.LuyckxK.KlimstraT. A.GoossensL. (2014). Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: a longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect. J. Adolesc.37, 691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 513

  ToN.NguyenN. (2015). Validity of the Vietnamese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Sleep Med.16:S52. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.02.128

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 514

  TobinS. J.GrahamS. (2020). Feedback sensitivity as a mediator of the relationship between attachment anxiety and problematic Facebook use. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.23, 562–566. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0560

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 515

  TosunL. P.KaşdarmaE. (2020). Passive Facebook use and depression: a study of the roles of upward comparisons, emotions, and friendship type. J. Media Psychol.32, 165–175. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 516

  TrầnT. M. Đ.CaoQ. T. (2018). Cảm nhận cô đơn của sinh viên và mối liên hệ giữa cảm nhận cô đơn với tự đánh giá bản thân, tiêu điểm kiểm soát bên ngoài. Tạp Chí Tâm Lý Học233, 16–30.

  • Google Scholar

• 517

  TranT. D.TranT.FisherJ. (2013). Validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women. BMC Psychiatry13:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-24

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 518

  TranT. B.UebelackerL.WenzeS. J.CollinsC.BroughtonM. K. (2015). Adaptive and maladaptive means of using Facebook: a qualitative pilot study to inform suggestions for development of a future intervention for depression. J. Psychiatr. Pract.21, 458–473. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000109

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 519

  TriệuP.EllisonN. B.SchoenebeckS. Y.BrewerR. N. (2021). Implications of Facebook engagement types and feed’s social content for self-esteem via social comparison processes. Social Media + Society7, 1–12. doi: 10.1177/20563051211042400

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 520

  TromholtM. (2016). The Facebook experiment: quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.19, 661–666. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0259

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 521

  TurelO.HeQ.XueG.XiaoL.BecharaA. (2014). Examination of neural systems sub-serving Facebook “Addiction”. Psychol. Rep.115, 675–695. doi: 10.2466/18.PR0.115c31z8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 522

  TürkmenO. O.KavaklıM.AkM. (2022). The multiple mediating roles of self-esteem and happiness in the relationship between loneliness and depression in Facebook and Instagram users. J. Clin. Psychiatry25, 23–30. doi: 10.5505/kpd.2022.79663

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 523

  UherR.PayneJ. L.PavlovaB.PerlisR. H. (2014). Major depressive disorder in DSM-5: implications for clinical practice and research of changes from DSM-IV. Depress. Anxiety31, 459–471. doi: 10.1002/da.22217

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 524

  UramP.SkalskiS. (2022). Still logged in? The link between Facebook addiction, FoMO, self-esteem, life satisfaction and loneliness in social media users. Psychol. Rep.125, 218–231. doi: 10.1177/0033294120980970

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 525

  UttravanichA.BlauwJ. N. (2018). Facebook use, appearance comparison, body dissatisfacion, and self-esteem in Thai female Facebook users. Scholar: Human Sciences10, 201–2013.

  • Google Scholar

• 526

  ValenzuelaS.ParkN.KeeK. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.14, 875–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 527

  ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. Commun. Res.35, 208–231. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313164

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 528

  ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychol. Behav.9, 584–590. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 529

  Van der ZeeK.BuunkB. P.SandermanR.BotkeG.van den BerghF. (2000). Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. Personal. Individ. Differ.28, 17–34. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00045-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 530

  VanmanE. J.BakerR.TobinS. J. (2018). The burden of online friends: the effects of giving up Facebook on stress and well-being. J. Soc. Psychol.158, 496–508. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1453467

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 531

  VannucciA.OhannessianC. M.GagnonS. (2019). Use of multiple social media platforms in relation to psychological functioning in emerging adults. Emerg. Adulthood7, 501–506. doi: 10.1177/2167696818782309

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 532

  VeitC. T.WareJ. E. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.51, 730–742. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 533

  VerduynP.GugushviliN.KrossE. (2022). Do social networking sites influence well-being? The extended active-passive model. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.31, 62–68. doi: 10.1177/09637214211053637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 534

  VerseilliéE.LaconiS.Castro-CalvoJ.ChabrolH. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale: one- or two-factor solution?Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00668-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 535

  Viala-DantenM.MartinS.GuilleminI.HaysR. D. (2008). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy during an international clinical trial. Health Qual. Life Outcomes6:113. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 536

  VigilT. R.WuH. D. (2015). Facebook users’ engagement and perceived life satisfaction. Media Commun.3, 5–16. doi: 10.17645/mac.v3i1.199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 537

  Villadangos FernándezJ. M.Errasti PérezJ. M.Amigo VázquezI.JolliffeD.García CuetoE. (2016). Characteristics of empathy in young people measured by the Spanish validation of the basic empathy scale. Psicothema28, 323–329.

  • Google Scholar

• 538

  VogelE. A.RoseJ. P.OkdieB. M.EcklesK.FranzB. (2015). Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personal. Individ. Differ.86, 249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 539

  VogelE. A.RoseJ. P.RobertsL. R.EcklesK. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult.3, 206–222. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 540

  vom BrockeJ.SimonsA.NiehavesB.RiemerK.PlattfautR.ClevenA. (2009). “Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process.” in S. Newell, E. A. Whitley, N. Pouloudi, J. Wareham, & L. Mathiassen (Eds.). Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems. pp. 2206–2217.

  • Google Scholar

• 541

  WalburgV.MialhesA.MonclaD. (2016). Does school-related burnout influence problematic Facebook use?Child Youth Serv. Rev.61, 327–331. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 542

  WalkerM.ThorntonL.De ChoudhuryM.TeevanJ.BulikC. M.LevinsonC. A.et al. (2015). Facebook use and disordered eating in college-aged women. J. Adolesc. Health57, 157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 543

  WaltherJ. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Hum. Behav.23, 2538–2557. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 544

  WaltherJ. B.BoydS. (2002). “Personality and the formation of social networks” in Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Use. eds. LinC. A.AtkinD. (Cresskill: Hampton Press), 153–188.

  • Google Scholar

• 545

  WangS. S. (2013). “I Share, Therefore I Am”: personality traits, life satisfaction, and Facebook check-ins. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.16, 870–877. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0395

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 546

  WangK.FrisonE.EggermontS.VandenboschL. (2018). Active public Facebook use and adolescents’ feelings of loneliness: evidence for a curvilinear relationship. J. Adolesc.67, 35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.05.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 547

  WangT.-J.KangC.-L.TsaiJ.-L.SongW.-T.LienA. S.-Y. (2021). Social media (Facebook) improper use and the influence of sleeping quality in Taiwan’s university students. Sci. Prog.104, 1–20. doi: 10.1177/00368504211011878

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 548

  WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1991). Mood and anxiety symptom questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Iowa.

  • Google Scholar

• 549

  WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 550

  WebsterJ.WatsonR. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q.26, xiii–xxiii.

  • Google Scholar

• 551

  WenningerH.KrasnovaH.BuxmannP. (2014). “Activity matters: investigating the influence of Facebook on life satisfaction of teenage users.” in Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems.

  • Google Scholar

• 552

  WhitmanC. N.GottdienerW. H. (2016). The cyber self: Facebook as a predictor of well-being. Int. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Stud.13, 142–162. doi: 10.1002/aps.1431

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 553

  WidyantoL.McMurranM. (2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychol. Behav.7, 443–450. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 554

  WittenbergM. T. (1986). Emotional and social loneliness: An examination of social skills, attributions, sex role, and object relations perspectives. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Rochester.

  • Google Scholar

• 555

  WolniczakI.Cáceres-Del AguilaJ. A.Palma-ArdilesG.ArroyoK. J.Solís-VisscherR.Paredes-YauriS.et al. (2013). Association between Facebook dependence and poor sleep quality: a study in a sample of undergraduate students in Peru. PLoS One8:e59087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059087

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 556

  World Health Organization (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Ed). Available at: https://icd.who.int/ [Accessed January 4, 2023].

  • Google Scholar

• 557

  WrightK. B.RosenbergJ.EgbertN.PloegerN. A.BernardD. R.KingS. (2013). Communication competence, social support, and depression among college students: a model of Facebook and face-to-face support network influence. J. Health Commun.18, 41–57. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.688250

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 558

  WrightE. J.WhiteK. M.ObstP. L. (2018). Facebook false self-presentation behaviors and negative mental health. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.21, 40–49. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0647

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 559

  XieW.KangC. (2015). See you, see me: teenagers’ self-disclosure and regret of posting on social network site. Comput. Hum. Behav.52, 398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.059

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 560

  XieW.KaranK. (2019). Predicting Facebook addiction and state anxiety without Facebook by gender, trait anxiety, Facebook intensity, and different Facebook activities. J. Behav. Addict.8, 79–87. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.09

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 561

  YangH. S.KimJ. H.SeoM. H. (2014). Does Facebook make us happy?: examining the relationship among college students’ Facebook use, upward social comparison and life satisfaction. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication58, 215–244.

  • Google Scholar

• 562

  YeS. Y. (2019). The relationships between Twitter use, social comparison and satisfaction of friendship among university students. Socio-Informatics8, 111–124.

  • Google Scholar

• 563

  YeS.HoK. K. W.ZerbeA. (2021). The effects of social media usage on loneliness and well-being: analysing friendship connections of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Inform. Dis. Delivery49, 136–150. doi: 10.1108/IDD-08-2020-0091

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 564

  Yeshua-KatzD.ZilbersteinT. (2021). Facebook use and well-being among army veterans with PTSD. Int. J. Commun.15, 5029–5050.

  • Google Scholar

• 565

  YoungK. S. (1998a). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction – and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.

  • Google Scholar

• 566

  YoungK. S. (1998b). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychol. Behav.1, 237–244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 567

  YoungK. S.de AbreuC. N. (2010). Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Google Scholar

• 568

  YusoffM. S. B. (2013). Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scale in a sample of medical degree applicants. Intern. Med. J.20, 295–300.

  • Google Scholar

• 569

  ZaffarM.MahmoodS.SaleemM.ZakariaE. (2015). Facebook addiction: relation with depression, anxiety, loneliness and academic performance of Pakistani students. Sci. Int.27, 2469–2475.

  • Google Scholar

• 570

  ZammunerV. L. (2008). Italians’ social and emotional loneliness: the results of five studies. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences2, 482–494.

  • Google Scholar

• 571

  ZawadzkiB.PopielA.PragłowskaE. (2009). Charakterystyka psychometryczna polskiej adaptacji Kwestionariusza Depresji BDI-II Aarona T. Becka. Psychol Etiol Genet19, 71–95.

  • Google Scholar

• 572

  ZhangR. (2017). The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: an examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Comput. Hum. Behav.75, 527–537. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 573

  ZhaoL.LuY.WangB.ChauP. Y. K.ZhangL. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: a social capital perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag.32, 574–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 574

  ZhongB. (2013). From smartphones to iPad: power users’ disposition toward mobile media devices. Comput. Hum. Behav.29, 1742–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 575

  ZiarkoM.KaczmarekŁ. D.HaładzińskiP. (2014). Polish version of Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D): results of a preliminary study on the psychometric properties of the scale. Curr. Issues Pers. Psychol.1, 51–61. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2013.40637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 576

  ZigmondA. S.SnaithR. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand.67, 361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 577

  ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J. Pers. Assess.52, 30–41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 578

  ZuboffS. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol.30, 75–89. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar